You Report, We Decide

News, Media, Politics, Music, Culture, Gossip, In The 215 And The Great Beyond

Everything You Know About Flash Mobs Is WRONG


deeneythumbnail.jpgBY JEFF DEENEY So late last week the flash mob story broke national, and the middle class is freaking out about poor black teens using new technologies to organize riots that threaten white business districts, even though now it seems there was never a flash mob to begin with.  You’ve heard all kinds of commentary from a thousand white journalists who have never spoken to black teenagers in the neighborhoods except maybe when taking statements in court for a story, and seen bloggers who are equally distanced from urban poverty jumping in front of cameras to play expert I guess because they have an Internet connection.  You’re probably sick of reading about the flash mobs by now, and I understand that this commentary is late in coming.  But the difference between what you’re about to read and what you’ve been reading is that I know what I’m talking about when it comes to how new technologies have taken hold in the neighborhoods I’ve spent a lot of time working in over the last few years.

In the spring of 2007 I stood in the living room of a run down row house on D Street, one of the roughest streets in North Philly’s Badlands, and watched one of my young clients obsessively updating his Myspace page.  His family was so poor they didn’t even have much furniture and they were always behind on rent but the boy had hustled up enough money to get a computer that he connected to a $10 per month Internet connection, a special deal for poor families offered by Verizon.

“He’s always on that damn computer,” his mother croaked from where she sat on their ragged couch watching daytime talk shows.  “It broke down last week and he stole a shopping cart from the super market and pushed it all the way across town to get it fixed, he needs it that bad.  He’s missing school, up all night on the Internet, but there ain’t nothing I can do about it.”

Honestly, she wasn’t trying very hard to do much about it.  Drug addicted and mentally ill, she had provided little guidance for the boy, or her two other kids.  I guess she was doing the best she could; I’m sure many would disagree with that, though.

Later that same year I sat having lunch with another young client at the McDonalds on 2nd and Lehigh in the same Badlands neighborhood.  A quiet, sullen kid, he sat mostly not speaking, staring at a Jay-Z video playing on his iPod.

“Who put that on there for you,” I asked.  I knew he was stone-cold illiterate, a high school drop out who had already done juvenile time on a gun charge.  There was no way he knew how to operate a computer well enough to load the video himself.

“For five dollars a week my cousin makes me a mix,” he said.

That’s a great hustle, I thought.  His young cousin probably made good money keeping his less computer-savvy friends up on hot new rap videos.  He was probably one of the few kids in the neighborhood who knew how to use the technology.

I’ve done social work in Philadelphia public schools; I worked in Bartram High, in the same violent Southwest Philly neighborhood where the papers flash-mob-2.jpgreported about 11 year old kids playing a violent game called “Catch and Wreck” that involves brutally beating people who appear to be homeless.  Bartram High, a crumbling and decrepit facility, had a “computer lab” with six aged Dell laptops for almost 2000 kids to use.  Actually, only about half of those kids showed up on any given day, but still.

Over time I heard about other similar black market enterprises run by early adopters in the ghetto; a young kid who knows how to use torrents and Photoshop churns out pro-quality DVD bootlegs and becomes sought out by the whole neighborhood because his boots aren’t that shaky cam shit shot in the theater that everyone’s used to.

By summer of 2008 social networking sites like Myspace and Blackplanet became not just places to chat with the neighborhood girls but places to gather to celebrate neighborhood affiliations.  Students in the public schools bragged back and forth, beefing with the kids across town about which school is tops.  Corner kids started discussion forums dedicated to singing the praises of their corner drug crews whose teenage members proudly posted pictures of themselves on their pages pointing handguns at the camera, flashing fat stacks of rubber banded bills and piles of bagged up drugs.

One particularly wild crew, the Erie Avenue Mob out of North Philly’s Simon Gratz High School, had their own custom made logo – the city skyline with two Uzis crossed under it like an “X” – and a group inviting other kids in their school to “Join the Mob.”  The School District denied that corner drug crews were using social networking sites to recruit in the schools, stating they were blocked on the school’s networks.

But it was clear that nonetheless more kids were getting online outside of school and the power of the web was bringing together more kids with dysfunctional backgrounds in poor, urban neighborhoods than ever before.  Sometimes the results were positive and constructive, sometimes they weren’t.

By 2009 the new must have status symbol was no longer an iPod packed with hot video mixes.  The new must have item, like Air Jordans or a leather jacket once upon a time, is the smartphone.   Now in the neighborhoods it’s all about the IPhone, the Blackberry, the Droid.  That’s how the kids in class know you’re gettin’ money:  you got a flashy new phone loaded with a Twitter app and monthly data plan.  Everyone you know knows where you’re at and what you’re up to anywhere you’re at.  It’s an odd status symbol in a lot of ways; to whites in the corporate world the Blackberry is often seen as a sort of albatross that tethers you eternally to the office and many resent this new superconnectivity that can keep them working around the clock.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anybody that when white people from healthy, nurturing families who have enjoyed the benefit of all the functional social institutions that come with privilege organize for a flash mob it’s an impromptu pillow fight and when newly networked black teens raised in dysfunctional families, deprivation and failing social institutions plan a flash mob it results in a crowd of angry boys beating on car hoods and chanting “burn the city.”  I think this stark difference highlights a lot about our intensely unequal society.

flash-mob-3.jpgBut was there even a flash mob?  When the story first broke I spent hours scouring Twitter and Facebook looking for evidence of a trail I could track back to those calling for a flash mob, and couldn’t find it.  I was able to find exactly on Twitter feed whose user mentioned getting texts about going to South Street, which, on the first warm Saturday night of the year, most kids would have done anyway.  Now Gawker has reported that the flash mob was nothing more than performances by couple dance troupes that got out of control.  The fact that the police department was calling it a flash mob organized on social networking sites should have been taken with a grain of salt because anyone who’s worked with the department knows that your average Philly cop is CAPS LOCK GUY who still has an AOL account, isn’t exactly up on new trends online, and might not be the most reliable source for this kind of information.

Days after the South Street flash mob, alerts went out from UPenn warning of another flash mob to form on 40th Street. The flash mob turned out to be a couple hundred white journalists with notepads and video cameras hoping for a mob of black teens to show up and act all ignorant.

But, not surprisingly, the Philly papers ran with the “flash mob” story for more than a week despite lack of evidence that there was a trend at work because it got them link arounds and page views despite the fact that the whole thing smelled like bullshit from the beginning.  The newspaper’s job is to critically analyze information from law enforcement sources, not parrot it because it’s sexy and results in page view spikes, but, hey, I understand they’re in a tough spot right now when it comes to money.

So there you have it, a brief history of how we got to where we are today with respect to poor kids and how they use the Internet, and how it may or may not have lead to the Great Flash Mob Scare of 2010.  Let’s hope for the sake of white people in suburbs everywhere that poor kids don’t continue to use new technologies to organize gatherings outside their own neighborhoods.  And let’s also hope that if they do, at least they act real crazy so that newspaper reporters can continue to have more material for their stories about the disturbing new “flash mob” trend that is sweeping the city.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Jeff Deeney is a freelance writer whose work has appeared on The Daily Beast, PW, City Paper and the Inquirer. He focuses on issues of urban poverty and drug culture. He is currently working on a book about life in the crossfire of poverty, drugs, guns, and the bureaucracies designed to remedy them, all of which informed his experiences as a social worker in some of the city’s most dire and depleted neighborhoods.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

15 Responses to “Everything You Know About Flash Mobs Is WRONG”

  1. Mithras Says:

    Who gives a shit whether the mob was a flashmob or not? People got threatened and assaulted and their stuff got vandalized by a large group of young people. That’s intrinsically bad and it’s also a big news item whether you called them flashmobs or whatever the flavor of the month is. (Anyone remember “wilding”?) Is it really better if these incidents happen organically rather than being organized?

  2. john Says:

    I’ll forward this to my friend’s missing teeth immediately.

    Any other high horses milling around?

  3. Jesse Says:

    Groups of violent, psychotic Philadelphia teenagers has nothing to do with race, it has to do with violent, psychotic teenagers. Convince the victims that it didn’t really happen… that it is all in their heads and that they should be less racist.

    You seem to portray yourself as some sort of voice for the poor black masses in the badlands, rallying against the evil exploitation of white journalists. I would contend that what you are doing here is more far more exploitive and condescending. Some social worker.

  4. deeney Says:

    John, so you are advocating for more racially motivated, sensationalized media frenzy because your friend got fucked up? Or you think it was an appropriate amount of racially motivated media frenzy? While Mithras seems to agree with you that igniting racially motivated media frenzy prior to getting the basic facts straight is a good thing, I generally don’t think it is. I like it when the media actually investigates claims made by law enforcement agencies and supports their stories with evidence, though at least Mithras seems to think accuracy is expendable as long as the general thrust is correct. I also like it when the media locally and nationally and readers locally and nationally give a shit when violence occurs in poor communities, not just when it happens in white neighborhoods. I think if more people, especially white liberals, were involved in communities other than their own these kinds of racial and economic divides wouldn’t be so great, and our position as a society less precarious.

  5. brewgrass Says:

    I, too, work as a social worker in some of the meaner parts of town. right now i am specializing in convincing families in west philly and southwest philly that school is a worthwhile weekday activity. i have followed your entries and find them interesting and refreshing. sad that “in the shadow” series has been shelved. one thing i find interesting is that high school kids in these poorer neighborhoods often attend school (read:not necessary classes) because that’s where their crew/girls happen to be. most of my truancy case load involve 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graders. The high school kids at West Philly High may cut classes, but they are generally in school b/c that’s where the action’s at. Kinda like the gallery or south street.

  6. Larry W Says:

    Hi Deeny,

    I actually agree with everything you have to say about the gathering on South Street as well. I’ve never agreed with calling these things “flash mobs”.

    Although, personally, I think the race aspect has been overstated here.

    Mithras said exactly what I thought about that part; It’s a large crowd of teenagers… its kinda unsettling.

    The reaction from business owners on the block is sad and, to a degree, shows something a little unsettling. At the same time, the fact that large gatherings on South Street have a bad history is well documented. One need only look at the occasional Mardi Gras, Greek Picnic, and gatherings of last summer that resulted in a massive amount of violence to see that.

    And it was 3000 teenagers.

    I’ve come to the defense on the kids by and large. By most accounts, this was actually incredibly tame with businesses seeing record profits because of it. Throw in that only a few actual incidents were reported and maybe, maybe, 1% of the crowd was violent… and this thing was blown so out the water its amazing.

    You’re right, thought; we need to do more to help poor communities as a whole around Philadelphia and bring everyone up instead of tearing people down. Focusing on the things that make life better for everyone… that’s what I would like to so see. :)

  7. Mithras Says:

    Yeah, fuck you, too. We get your point: You’re racism-free and going to let everyone else know about it. Good for you. Seriously, what difference does it make whether the kids out that night got there because of twitter or a text message? Articulate the substantive difference or shut the fuck up.

  8. Ed Says:

    Thanks for the thoughtful, informed discussion. I agree that the media did a horrible job investigating the causes of these incidents.

  9. Richard Says:

    Hey, Do something productive today. Wouldn’t that feel good?

  10. Mithras Says:

    Also, Deeney gets snotty about “media actually investigat[ing] claims”, what kind of investigating has he done here? This is the entirety of it:

    “When the story first broke I spent hours scouring Twitter and Facebook looking for evidence of a trail I could track back to those calling for a flash mob, and couldn’t find it.”

    Nowhere did he find a source from the PD or the city to ask why they called it a flashmob. He basically accuses them of incompetence and whipping up “sensationalized media frenzy”, but doesn’t bother calling them and asking the question. Deeney doesn’t even find a source to define what a “flash mob” is, but just assumes that if it doesn’t involve twitter and facebook, it’s not a flash mob. He wanted to write an opinion piece saying that white liberals are at fault for the violence on South Street, and he pulled the rest out of his ass. Well done.

  11. Daily Links for March 31st | Akkam's Razor Says:

    […] Everything You Know About Flash Mobs Is WRONG – damn good. […]

  12. Daily Links for March 31st through April 1st | Akkam's Razor Says:

    […] Everything You Know About Flash Mobs Is WRONG – damn good. […]

  13. Valrayne Says:

    I don’t think john was implying anything about media hype. He was just making the observation that your poor journalism and white guilt flies in the face of those involved in the “event” that were injured and had their businesses vandalized.

    And Mithras is right. You have no credibility if the extent of your research is via online social networking sites.

  14. Technically Philly » Links: Jeff Deeney on flash mobs, Arlen wants stricter privacy laws and more | Covering the Community of People Who Use Technology in Philadelphia. Says:

    […] we tweeted, Phawker contributor Jeff Deeney gives flash mobs his social-worker -experience […]

  15. Walter Says:

    I’m glad I had this article so that I could know what really happened

Leave a Reply