RSSMAILBAG: “Leonard Cohen Is Not A ‘Great Man’”
DEAR PHAWKER:
Leonard Cohen is not a great man. He appears to have committed criminal tax fraud that I reported to the IRS, probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury, defrauded me of millions, and seems to think it’s acceptable to lie in every courtroom he shows up in. There is nothing great about a calculated fraud liar. I am praying that Phil Spector nails him on his probable perjury and I personally will be litigating my own situation against him in the not too distant future. While journalists may be awed by a man who also appears to have a pattern of stealing from his advisers (Marty Machat comes to mind) ordinary folks are not impressed with his involvement with the destruction of my life. I’m not particularly impressed by his lawyer’s Declaration in my young son’s custody matter (which I view as coercion, witness tampering, an attempt to obstruct justice, etc.) and I found it truly deranged that he went into my young son’s father’s office to “allege” that I had sex with Oliver Stone. This just confirmed, to me, that Cohen is obsessed with me and keenly interested in my sex life. I never had sex with Oliver Stone and I was not Leonard Cohen’s lover. He is merely a pathelogical liar who believes Phil Spector and I will take the fall for him.
Kelley Lynch [former manager of Leonard Cohen]
http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/2009/09/kelleys-final-version-letter-to-alan.html
***
DEAR PHAWKER,
To those of you who have not yet been “lucky” enough to meet Kelley Lynch on the internet, you are hereby warned that she is a very disturbed woman so filled with hate and desire for revenge that I believe she can be dangerous to anyone who gets involved with her and her crazy rantings.
Ms. Lynch was indeed Leonard Cohen’s personal manager for several years. However, a few years ago Leonard Cohen discovered that Ms. Lynch had stolen and mismanaged his entire savings. Cohen fired her, sued her and won a 
judgement of $7.9 million. However, Ms. Lynch vanished and never made an attempt to pay back the money she stole from the old poet, instead she (from where ever she was hiding) started to harass Mr. Cohen and his lawyer (E-mails and phonecalls). In 2008 Leonard Cohen obtained a restraining order against Ms. Lynch, which she accepted, but she then started a vicious hate campaign against Leonard Cohen by targeting every newspaper/magazine forum and blog who would bring a favorable review of a performance. Ms Lynch has in the most disgusting manner slandered and lied about Mr. Cohen and his family; she has accused him of every crime in the book from tax fraud, thief, child molester, perjurer and much more. Any blogger who will respond and disagree or object to her brutal attacks, she will verbally abuse and often threaten to “report” to the Department of Justice or even at one point to “Department of Crimes against Humanity” in Haag, for making her look and sound “not credible” and for obstructing justice. She will also turn things around and play the “Victim”, accusing all who in a disagreeable way replies to her postings, that we are “l stupid, insane liers that are cyberstalking and harassing her, her children and parents and destroying her life.
In the past few years Ms. Lynch has sent several hundred E-mails to the IRS and other public offices and demanded that they investigate and punish Leonard Cohen and everybody she believes are in conspiracy with him to destroy her life. For several years she has “been waiting” for Bruce Cutler or some other high profile lawyer from Phil Spector’s legal team” to knock on her door and take her law suit against Cohen and others.
Ms. Lynch has been banned from practically every blog and forum she has posted on as most of the blogs she has established herself have been removed for “Slanderous and hateful content”.
It should be noted that Leonard Cohen has never been arrested, charged or prosecuted for any wrong doing as well as he has never responded to Ms. Lynch’s slanderous hate campaign, and since the legal matters were finalized he has never publicly spoken of Ms. Lynch or her bertrayals.
Sincerely
Susanne Walsh
***
THE CANADIAN ENCYCLOPEDIA: TAKE AN ICONIC ARTIST, mix in missing millions, hints of tantric sex, a lawsuit replete with other salacious details, and a ruptured relationship with a long-time, trusted associate, and you’ve got the makings of a Hollywood blockbuster. Except in the case of Leonard COHEN, it’s a true tale, with the bizarre twist of a Tibetan Buddhist suing a Zen Buddhist, Cohen. For the 70-year-old poet, singer and songwriter, it’s a nasty, rapidly escalating legal battle that on the one hand accuses him of conspiracy and extortion, and on the other has him accusing both his highly trusted personal manager and long-time financial adviser - the Tibetan Buddhist - of gross mismanagement of his financial affairs. The case exposes not only private details of Cohen’s finances, but also a dramatic tale of betrayal.
The conflict, which Cohen and others have tried to keep out of public view, has left him virtually broke - he’s had to 
take out a mortgage on his house to pay legal costs - and facing a multi-million-dollar tax bill. […] The conflict was triggered last fall when Cohen was tipped off by an insider that a lot of money was missing from his accounts. All that remained of his retirement savings was the $150,000, funds that today he can’t get at as a result of the tangled legal web he finds himself in. Greenberg’s suit portrays the soulful songwriter as an artist who paid little attention to his financial affairs and so was easily duped by a conniving personal manager. Cohen says he tried quietly, and confidentially, to find out from his various managers where the money had gone. Cohen calls the case “a tragedy,” suggesting he was exploited by trusted advisers. He uses words like “greed, concealment, and reckless disregard,” and says firmly he did nothing wrong. “I can assure you, within reason, I took every precaution except to question the fidelity of my closest associates.”
UNTIL COHEN fired her last fall, Kelley Lynch had been his personal manager for almost 17 years. Back in 1988, she’d been working as an assistant to his then-manager, who died that year. Because she was knowledgeable about Cohen’s business affairs and recording contracts, he had her take over. Over the years, the two developed a personal and professional relationship. Fifteen years ago, they had a brief affair. “It was a casual sexual arrangement. It was mutually enjoyed and terminated,” he says. “I never spent the night.” The end of the affair didn’t affect their bond. “We were very, very close friends,” Cohen says today. “I liked her immensely. Our families were close - she was helpful when I was raising my daughter; I employed her father.” He even named her in his living will, giving her the power to decide, in certain circumstances, if he would live or die. He handed her vast powers of attorney. He trusted her implicitly. And he believed the relationship was mutual. MORE
October 24th, 2009 at 9:29 am
Dear Blogger
To those of you who have not yet been “lucky” enough to meet Kelley Lynch on the internet, you are hereby warned that she is a very disturbed woman so filled with hate and desire for revenge that I believe she can be dangerous to anyone who gets involved with her and her crazy rantings.
Ms. Lynch was indeed Leonard Cohen’s personal manager for several years. However, a few years ago Leonard Cohen discovered that Ms. Lynch had stolen and mismanaged his entire savings. Cohen fired her, sued her and won a judgement of $7.9 million. However, Ms. Lynch vanished and never made an attempt to pay back the money she stole from the old poet, instead she (from where ever she was hiding) started to harass Mr. Cohen and his lawyer (E-mails and phonecalls). In 2008 Leonard Cohen obtained a restraining order against Ms. Lynch, which she accepted, but she then started a vicious hate campaign against Leonard Cohen by targeting every newspaper/magazine forum and blog who would bring a favorable review of a performance. Ms Lynch has in the most disgusting manner slandered and lied about Mr. Cohen and his family; she has accused him of every crime in the book from tax fraud, thief, child molester, perjurer and much more. Any blogger who will respond and disagree or object to her brutal attacks, she will verbally abuse and often threaten to “report” to the Department of Justice or even at one point to “Department of Crimes against Humanity” in Haag, for making her look and sound “not credible” and for obstructing justice. She will also turn things around and play the “Victim”, accusing all who in a disagreeable way replies to her postings, that we are “l stupid, insane liers that are cyberstalking and harassing her, her children and parents and destroying her life.
In the past few years Ms. Lynch has sent several hundred E-mails to the IRS and other public offices and demanded that they investigate and punish Leonard Cohen and everybody she believes are in conspiracy with him to destroy her life. For several years she has “been waiting” for Bruce Cutler or some other high profile lawyer from Phil Spector’s legal team” to knock on her door and take her law suit against Cohen and others.
Ms. Lynch has been banned from practically every blog and forum she has posted on as most of the blogs she has established herself have been removed for “Slanderous and hateful content”.
It should be noted that Leonard Cohen has never been arrested, charged or prosecuted for any wrong doing as well as he has never responded to Ms. Lynch’s slanderous hate campaign, and since the legal matters were finalized he has never publicly spoken of Ms. Lynch or her bertrayals.
Sincerely
Susanne Walsh
October 27th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
To Phawker,
Thank you for supporting freedom of speech. Susanne Walsh has written me, privately, that she does not know Leonard Cohen and feels she can speak on behalf of Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and the Treasury Department based on intuition. It would seem to me that if one were using true intuition one might assume the IRS is actually interested in criminal tax fraud with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million. One might also wonder why Agent Sopko/Treasury flew into California to meet with me and referred me to Agent Luis Tejeda/IRS Fraud Unit/Los Angeles with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, and reported to the IRS.
I feel I have a right to publicly defend myself. Leonard Cohen, and others, have slandered me, maligned me, and have targeted my children.
Leonard Cohen did not discover anything having to do with his so-called finances (managed by Neal Greenberg) in the fall of 2004. He discovered that I switched accountants and was told that I should see lawyers due to the fact that Cohen had involved me - unknowingly - in fraud on various entities. Walsh has not reviewed the evidence (corporate books, stock certificates, notarized documents, memorandums, deal memos, emails, etc.) that I have shared with the IRS and therefore cannot address criminal tax fraud. I tend to doubt she is a tax lawyer in any event. Cohen did not fire me. Cohen wanted me to meet with him and his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, to unravel the work they did relating to Traditional Holdings, LLC and LC Investments, LLC - and possibly other entities. I refused and my lawyer wrote Westin asking him, as the architect of Traditional Holdings, LLC, to explain the structure and my tax liability. This is where things escallated but I was not “fired” and I did not steal. Cohen owes me millions and is well aware that he compensated me with 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. which owned all intellectual property. Cohen sued me because I went to the IRS. I refused to participate in that lawsuit because I felt (and continue to believe) that the suit was nothing other than an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and criminal conduct. Cohen didn’t “win” a judgment. He perjured himself and lied when he said I was a trustee - constructive or otherwise. I have requested, from the IRS, an Opinion Letter on this issue and others and will respond to Cohen’s lawsuit once I have the IRS and State of Kentucky’s Opinions. It would be impossible to respond, otherwise, because I am not a tax lawyer and what has been done is incredibly complex. Cohen’s own accountant told me it reminded him of Enron.
Cohen obtained a fraudulent restraining order against me after Ann Diamond made it clear, in writing, that Freda Guttman told her that Lorca Cohen informed her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. And, Ann Diamond wrote a draft article fo Rolling Stone emphasizing the facts of this matter and what has happened to my life. This caused Cohen, via Kory, to threaten her. Shortly thereafter (to my shock and amazement) Cohen took out a fraudulent restraining order against me - which was, essentially, a way to prevent me from communicating with Robert Kory: about the illegal K1s I was issued, my intellectual property that has been stolen, a 1099 I never received (on monies I now view as a gift because no one will address them), Kory’s Declaration in my young son’s custody matter (witness tampering), and other “tax matters.”
I did not vanish but Walsh, as usual, likes to perpetrate lies and shows up on other Blogs that are dead set on undermining my credibility - essentially witness tampering and attempting to obstruct justice. These Blogs include Blogonaut and Michelle Blaine’s mControl. Blogonaut even offered to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen and appeared to state that Cohen was willing to help me and I could have my former life back - including my children.
I have never harassed Cohen or his lawyer. The truth is not a hate campaign. It is merely the truth although people, including Cohen and Kory, have gone to extreme lengths to silence me. I didn’t “target” newspapers, etc. I began responding to articles, etc. when I noticed that I was slandered or lied about. That seems reasonable. I have never slandered and/or lied about Cohen and/or his family.
My advisers, DiMascio and Berardo and Dale Burgess told me that Cohen had committed criminal tax fraud and exposed me to it. Dale Burgess asked me to inform the IRS and Treasury that he would testify to the fact that Cohen offered me 50% community property - presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers which is preposterous. Cohen’s disdain for “ordinary income taxes” is quite possibly unprecedented.
Let me repeat this statement: Freda Guttman told Ann Diamond, a former friend of Cohen’s, that Lorca Cohen told her classmates (or friends) at Concordia that her father molested her. I have this in writing from Ms. Diamond.
I have written to the Hague about a number of issues - including the fact that I believe the human rights violations in Tibet are egregious. My teachers and friends live there and continue to live in unconscionable circumstances. Every Tibetan friend I have has had a relative murdered or imprisoned. I have no idea why feeling compassionate for the Tibetan people would be viewed as crazy. Ignoring devastating civil rights violations is crazy to me. I can assure you that I didn’t write the Hague about Cohen. That’s another absolutely absurd statement.
I am not playing the victim. My life has been destroyed because I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and because I am a friend of Phil Spector’s. I am also firmly convinced that Leonard Cohen perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury and only a fool would believe that Mr. Spector will not attack that situation legally.
For the record, my Mother told me she is convinced that these maniacs will target her which is unconscionable to me. Both of my children have already been targeted.
Perhaps Susanne Walsh is a “secret IRS Agent” and knows what is going on with the IRS internally. It is conceivable, I suppose, that she has insider information.
I have never used the word “punish” when writing to any agency or anyone else about Leonard Cohen. I have stated, quite clearly, that I believe he should be investigated, charged, arrested, and tried for what I am convinced are crimes.
I am not waiting for Bruce Cutler or some other high profile lawyer from Phil Spector’s legal team to knock on my door. I am, however, waiting to speak with Phil Spector directly and if anyone thinks we aren’t going to speak they are delusional and do not know either Mr. Spector or myself.
I have not been banned from Blogs - other than Blogonaut’s, Michelle Blaine’s (which was a vile and malicious site that seemed dead set on villifying Phil Spector for personal reasons), and perhaps others that I am unaware of. My content is not slanderous and hateful. It is the truth although the conduct on the part of many has been hateful - at best.
Cohen has recently spoken about the situation with me publicly - in a televised interview in Finland. Apparently this isn’t a spiritual exercise. That, to me, is merely further evidence of Cohen’s nauseatingly carefully crafted comments - tailor made for the news media.
The legal matters are not finalized and I do not believe California is the jurisdiction where I will file my suit against Cohen. I cannot imagine how a California Court would have jurisdiction over a Kentucky and Delaware entity. Fortunately, I’m not taking legal advice from the idiots and liars following me around the internet in an attempt to silence me. It is no doubt timed to coincide with Phil Spector’s appeal. The stakes are high when a legend has been “framed” by a District Attorney. That may be why so many people are wondering why the “prosecutor” hasn’t been arrested yet.
Kelley Lynch
October 28th, 2009 at 6:04 am
Dear Phawker
I will not comment on Kelley Lynch’s perception of the truth, readers may make up their own minds.
I will however correct some statements by Ms. Lynch that I know as facts.
Kelly Lynch “Cohen has recently spoken about the situation with me publicly in a televised interview in Finland”
The interview with Leonard Cohen, Anjani Thomas and Al Gore was televised on March 30, 2007 (more than 2 ½ years ago,) and it was in Norway. Leonard Cohen was asked about “the situation” and he briefly touched on the facts that he has lost his savings, but he did not elaborate and did not mention the name Kelley Lynch.
Kelley Lynch states that she “has not been banned from forums or blogs. That is NOT true, at least two of her own blogs have been removed by Google for hateful and slanderous content and many of her postings have been removed by various newspapers, most recently on October 26, 2009 by “Creative Loafing.com” in connection with a review of Leonard Cohen’s concert at The Fox.
Administrater of the blog says:
NOTE: A grand total of 3 comments were removed from the thread below because they were posted by a troll, and as such are a clear violation of our comments policy. That is all.
A comment on the thread posted by “Truth to be told”
“Ms. Lynch is a known cyber-stalker, who posts similar comments widely across the webb. Very sad.”
Sincerely
Susanne Walsh
October 28th, 2009 at 10:52 am
In refutation of Susanne Walsh’s latest round of lies: Walsh stated that Cohen had not spoken publicly against me since the legal issues between us were resolved. They have not been resolved and he gave this interview in Finland after he filed his bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached. If Leonard Cohen thinks allegations of criminal tax fraud and perjry in the Phil Spector matter (and elsewhere) are “pesky details” that, to me, is evidence that he is not thinking correctly. Cohen didn’t lose his savings. He has said that he lost his retirement. Unfortunately, the “private annuity” (which, I assume, is the retirement fund he has referred to publicly) was “extinguished” on the tax return by his tax lawyer. Richard Westin emailed me that he only represented Leonard Cohen and not me. The promissory note I invested in Traditional Holdings, LLC with was also extinguished. The income from the sale to Sony was not reported on the tax returns. All of this was done, ostensibly, in order to roll Traditional Holdings back into LC Investments, LLC. Sometime after I refused to meet with Cohen in the fall of 2004, refused to accept 50% community property as part of what I viewed as an illegal deal, I was issued illegal K1s on LC Investments, LLC. This was brought to my attention by the IRS. There are no partnership documents in place on this entity and it is - no doubt - illegal. Cohen borrowed millions against his so-called “retirement” account and was supposed to repay them at 6% interest within three years. Walsh has no idea what she is talking about and I think it’s safe to assume that she has not reviewed the corporate books, records, stock certificates, and other evidence I have supplied the IRS and others with. I also tend to doubt she is a forensic accountant. Cohen’s forensic accountant, Kevin Prins - Moss Adams, determined that a tremendous amount of back-up documentation (including asset valuations re. my share of intellectual property, etc.) was missing. My accountant, after meeting with him, put that in a fax to my lawyers. That document has now been made a matter of public record and is attached - with other evidence - to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order in Boulder, Colorado. When people heard that Cohen flew into Boulder to lie further they thought it was evidence that he is “insane.” The indexes of the corporate books and records are also filed as evidence and there are no documents proving that I own 99.5% of LC Investments, LLC - which is precisely what two K1s and a cover letter provided to the State of Kentucky prove.
I believe I am the victim of cyber-terrorism. I personally removed my Blog (philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com) after capturing truly malicious comments. I have notified Google that my other Blogs and email accounts were targeted by cyber-terrorists (including Michelle Blaine, Blogonaut, Gianelli, Belark, and others) and will subpoena that information at a later date in time. I notified the Hartford Courant of the slander on their Blog - via emails - and asked them to remove the comments. They were removed and until I subpoena that information I do not know if they were removed based on my request or not.
I have no idea about “CreativeLoafing.com” but will look into this as well and have brought it to the attention of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and the Treasury Department. I would like to know who “Truth to be told” is and believe this campaign of cyber-terrorism is meant to silence me. There is evidence, with Boies Schiller, that Cohen and Kory planned to silence me, terrorize me, and crush me - particularly if I spoke the truth about Cohen.
This situation is not “very sad.” It is pathetic. In Cohen’s Norwegian interview he notes that the situation with me is a “pesky detail.” There is nothing “pesky” about deadly serious allegations of criminal tax fraud, perjury in a murder trial, etc. I have no idea what Walsh’s motive is but she seems intent on involving herself in this matter. She continues to refer to my children who have been highly traumatized by this ordeal. My younger son, as I have stated, witnessed a conversation between me and Robert Kory about Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; my intellectual property that was stolen by Cohen; the missing state tax returns; and their threats. At this moment in time, Cohen and Kory began “encouraing” my younger son’s father to take my son away from me. This is witness tampering and I took shorthand notes of my son’s comments and memories about the meeting he witnessed between me and Robert Kory and have conveyed them - with his permission - to the IRS.
Kelley Lynch
October 29th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
Sadly, Ms. Walsh speaks the truth, Kelley Lynch does not.
Kelley Lynch is currently living in a homeless shelter in the Houston Texas area where she blogs her hate filled diatribes to all who will listen from a nearby branch of the public library.
Kelley Lynch has written hundreds, if not thousands, of emails, all copied the IRS, Justice Department, governors, prosecutors, and others (you name it), accusing me (and other bloggers who dared to disagree with her) of being a criminal, being guilty of “obstruction of justice”, cyber stalking, cyber terrorism, etc. and then posted these rambling and insane emails on her various blogs–many of which have been taken down by Google as Ms. Walsh claims.
Kelley Lynch’s current financial, legal, and custody problems stem from a series of unfortunate ethical, lifestyle, and substance abuse choices that were are Lynch’s responsibility and no one else’s.
Incidentally, Lynch stalked Phil Spector attorney Bruce Cutler for years by leaving him 10-20 long rambling and unwanted voice messages on his office phone a day, and Spector’s high profile investigator also went public, stated that Lynch is seriously disturbed, and that he has nothing to do with her. Nor is there any proof that Leonard Cohen even testified before Phil Spector’s grand jury—let alone falsely. Certainly neither Lynch nor Cohen testified in either of Phil Spector’s criminal trials.
Curiously, Lynch—who claims to be a “dear friend” of Spector’s—did not attend a single day of either of Spector’s two criminal trials to show moral support either.
At this point Lynch is just another tragically obsessed, rambling and semi-coherent homeless person with a sob story who is no closer to getting help for herself and thereby reuniting with her children and family members.
October 31st, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Kelley Lynch states that she is not slandering Leonard Cohen, because she is “telling the truth” , and the truth is not slander.
Now the truth can be several things, the factual truth and the perceived truth, there is Kelley Lynch’s truth and Leonard Cohen’s truth and if they believe in a God there is the truth they will have to face on “judgement day”, but the only truth that really matters in the eyes of the world, is the what the legal system has determined to be the truth, and that is that Kelley Lynch has stolen or defrauded Leonard Cohen of millions of dollars.
Unless, or untill , Kelley Lynch has filed and won a counter suit, all her accusations and alegations of Leonard Cohens “crimes” WILL be slander and lies.
If Kelley Lynch really has all that evidence and proof of Leonard Cohen’s “crimes” as she claims, it should be “a piece of cake” for her to get Leonard Cohen put behind bars and get all the “millions” back, she claims he owes her, but writing about it on the web is not the way to do it.
Regarding the “Cyberstalking”. Kelley Lynch cyberstalk innocent reporters and journalist who are doing their job of reporting and reviewing a performance by Leonard Cohen, and then barge in and overtake the forum with all her private problems of hate, that has nothing to do with the performance.
All blog-owners and administrators have the right to deceide which comments and posts they will accept. Most have a policy of not accepting “Personal, defamitory, slanderous attacks” and faul language. It is safe to say that Ms. Lynch ignore these rules. Therefore most of her comments, posts and blogs gets deleted or removed, not because Leonard Cohen, Robert Cory or anybody else wants to “silence” her.
As for me mentioning her children, it is only because Ms. Lynch constantly try to get sympathy by mentioning that her children and her elderly parents are being targeted by “bloggers”. We do not target her family. Kelley Lynch subjects her family to unbelivable embarressment and humiliation by her bizare behavior.
Susanne Walsh
November 6th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Susanne Walsh does not speak the truth. She views this situation, from what I can tell, as entertainment. Walsh is also a bald-faced liar. My older son wants to join me in a lawsuit against Cohen, Lindsey, and others, for the destruction of our lives. He has witnessed much of what has occurred and knows for a fact that he was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my former house to Cohen/Kory while I was being taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector. Cohen’s actions are indeed ugly and hateful.
I am assuming that the other Kelley Lynch “victim” is Blogonaut/Gianelli who seems to have lied to Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland about the fact that I am or was spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the Treasury Department. It seems preposterous to assume that Agent Sopko, who I met, is unable to speak for herself. Lying to the FBI is criminal and I believe this should be pursued. I also believe Blogonaut/Gianelli’s “motive” should be investigated - including “its” attempt to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen - who, apparently - would be willing to help me. All I would have to do, as usual, is lie. Cohen should have realized, when I declined his offer of 50% community property, that I would not lie for him.
I have no idea why this individual is dead set on posting my whereabouts and these are not diatribes. I am presently working on my book entitled “Merry Christmas To The Denver FBI” which will include more information on Leonard Cohen, his tax fraud (that I was told is criminal), and - hopefully - an interview with Phil Spector on Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury.
I have been documenting the destruction of my life for quite a long time now - for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others. I am presently waiting for an IRS Opinion Letter on various matters - including why Cohen led me to believe that there was a “private annuity obligation” when it had been extinguished from the tax return; whether or not his loans from Traditional Holdings, LLC need to be repaid and why they were “dangerous” to the structure; and where the IRS thinks my share of intellectual property is - Cohen’s own accountant believed, as did mine, that it was still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Once I have the Opinion Letter I will speak to the criminal attorney I am presently consultnig about filing my lawsuit - against Cohen - in the proper venue. He - not I and not cyber-terrorists - will determine what the proper jurisdiction is.
I have no substance abuse issues and Blogonaut/Gianelli will be able to prove this - and their other absurd lies - when hell freezes over.
Bruce Cutler will have to take the stand and comment, for himself, about my telephone messages and the faxes he received, a letter from my son’s school that was mailed to him, and why his investigator - Dale Kelly - met with me in Santa Monica. Phil Spector can address Bill Pavelic’s public comments. I have nothing further to say about Bill Pavelic but assume his allegations that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaliation for the OJ trial are true. Whether or not Cohen testified in Phil Spector’s grand jury, as Mick Brown/UK Telegraph advised me, is well known to Phil Spector and Cohen makes an “appearance” in the District Attorney’s Motion In Limine. There should also be some type of report from the day the detectives I met rolled by Cohen’s house to interview him about his comments, to the news media, over the years. Those are Cohen’s “good rock ‘n roll stories” as he told the detectives.
Fortunately, as Investigator Frayeh, and I discussed I did not testify in Phillip’s trial. I also did not drag myself into it. An anonymous tip was placed - to the DA by a woman - about my friendship with Mr. Spector. That’s right - I did not attend the shameless, horrifying set up of Mr. Phil Spector. Attending a fraudulent public circus is not the only way to show one’s support for Mr. Spector. Blogonaut/Gianelli cannot speak for Phil Spector although “it” does speak for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko - Treasury Department, Agent Wynar - FBI Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, and others.
People reading my emails have no difficulty, whatsoever, following them. As my friend Terre Roche understood: there’s something wrong with the fact that Cohen’s being feted in the news media while I ended up in a homeless shelter. Apparently this is something for a man who has defrauded me of millions to be proud of.
I am very close with my parents and children. My Mother is encouraging me to write a book and I intend to do that.
Cyber-stalkers Blogonaut and Walsh, who continues to write me, cannot prevent “Merry Christmas to the Denver FBI” from coming out. I think publishers will be most interested in this scandalous, salacious story.
Trust me - Cohen and Kory want to silence me. They’re perjury, fraud, and shameful restraining orders are evidence of this. The good news - Phil Spector has not been accused of being Cohen’s “lover.”
Kelley Lynch
P.S. It’s not my job to put Cohen behind bars. I think it will be easy for Phil Spector to prove Cohen perjured himself in his grand jury.
P.P.S. Certain “innocent journalists” - such as Larry Rohter/NY Times have actually asked me to call them. Let me quote my former lawyer, Michael Taitelman: when there’s a “he said/she said story” - you go to the corporate bokos and records. Please refer to the corporate indexes I filed with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s insanity with the Boulder Municipal Court. They prove I did not own LC Investments, LLC but was illegally issued K1s by Leonard Cohen.
November 6th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
P.S. Bruce Cutler can talk to my Mother about the fact that she, and others, hoped I would marry him. Last I heard my sex life was not anyone’s business. Please see my letter to Phil Spector’s prosecutor which addresses the fact that William Frayeh, an investigator on the Phil Spector matter, told me Pat Dixon was good looking. He also emailed me that he had passed my letter onto the parties I asked him to: District Attorney Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, and Truc Do. Investigator Frayeh did not think the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury were playing games. I have also contacted the DEA to request an independent investigation into Clarkson’s “suicide” at Phil Spector’s house. They investigated Anna Nicole Smith and Heath Ledger’s deaths and other people’s lives did not appear to be in danger in those incidents.
cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
November 6th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
P.P.S. Perhaps Blogonaut-Gianelli shouldn’t be so proud/amused by the fact that “it” has lied to the FBI in Oakland. Last I heard lying to the FBI was a crime. In this instance, it is clearly a joke and I think it’s safe to say that the FBI has a far greater tolerance for people who lie to them and waste their resources than I have … IF they believe it is acceptable and IF they do not intend to investigate these matters. I remain unconvinced that everyone at the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and/or the Treasury are stupid mindless idiots. I am convinced that Gianelli/Blogonaut think they are.
November 7th, 2009 at 8:18 am
Kelley Lynch’s “Friend” thinks there is something wrong with the fact that Leonard Cohen is being feted in the news media, while Kelley Lynch ended up in a homeless shelter.
Some may find it strange that the “alleged” fraud is hiding out in various corners of the country, spending her life writing hateful slander about the person she defrauded, while the victim is working an unbelivable scedule so he can enjoy the retirement he had planned several years ago.
What is right with this picture is, that in spite of Ms. Lynch’s effort to smear Leonard Cohen’s reputation, she herself may be the most disliked and disrespected person in Cyber-world, while Leonard Cohen has gained more than “Obama-like” popularity and respect worldwide. It just shows that bad things come to bad people and good things to good people after all.
Some may also wonder where “The Millions of dollars” Ms. Lynch claims Leonard Cohen stole or defrauded her of, came from? Unless Ms. Lynch wrote and performed some Eminem kind of pop song that nobody knows about, it seems that “The Millions of Dollars” must have come from Leonard Cohen’s “Pornographic Imagery interwoven with biblical references”, that she never liked and made no sense to her (as Ms. Lynch stated elsewhere).
Susanne Walsh
November 9th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Dear Phawker,
I have been forced to block Susanne Walsh from my email account. She decided to review my Blog and felt sympathy about my foot, staph infection, etc.
As the Director of the Star of Hope noted (after reviewing some of the “insanity”) - everyone knows where you are. He then wondered about my safety. I assured him that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko - the Treasury, Agent Wynar - the FBI, and many others know very well where I am. I am not hiding out and that is another lie by a woman I do not know. I am not spending my life writing hateful slander about Cohen. I am telling the truth and he has stolen millions from me. I just wrote the State of Kentucky this morning about the Opinion Letter I am awaiting from them. I am also awaiting an Opinion Letter from the IRS. I have no interest, whatsoever, in Walsh’s theories - because she does not know me, did not know Cohen when I worked as his personal manager, does not have the corporate books, records, etc. and is dead set apparently on slandering me in order to help out her idol. That’s questionable motive from my perspective and nothing about criminal tax fraud, perjury, etc. is “intuition.” It’s usually quite black and white.
Leonard Cohen’s daughter - not I - aopears to have told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. That was repeated by Freda Guttman to Ann Diamond. Cohen himself was very very concerned about this allegation. Perhaps Ms. Walsh should write Cohen’s daughter and admonish her.
I don’t think I’m all that disliked in the cyber-world. The people I know who have read some of the garbage on the internet (about me) really have no idea who Cohen is and wonder why the IRS hasn’t prosecuted him yet.
I also find Walsh’s attempts to excuse Cohen from all wrong-doing (including stealing from me) pathetic.
Beyond that I can’t follow her insaned logic. Eminem wrote “Puke.” I dedicated it to Phil Spector’s prosecutor Pat Dixon.
If I follow Walsh’s logic I have to conclude that it’s fine for Cohen to steal from his advisers, possibly molest his daughter (according to what Guttman said), destroy people, commit fraud and perjury (probably in Phil Spector’s matter), and if you get away with it you’re a good person. That tells me that Walsh is completely out of her mind.
Kelley Lynch
P.S. For the record, Cohen did not plan his retirement when I worked for him until the fall of 2004. He planned to tour again. He just needs these little garbage stories for the news media: ie., Phil Spector and guns; DeMornay and the hand that rocked the cradle headlines; and, this. Of course, I know Cohen well and realize that he felt Sony gypped him when he sold them his publishing. I think the letter I have from Marty Machat to Irving Trust proves that Cohen has a pattern of “defrauding” and “stealing” from his advisers.
P.P.S. Walsh is involved with a popularity contest from what I can tell. I’m waiting to speak to Phil Spector and will respond legally when the criminal attorney I am consulting decides I should move legally.
fromKelley Lynch to”Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,doronweinberg ,Dennis ,”*irs. commissioner” ,ASKDOJ ,Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,Robert MacMillan ,”Lee K. Alpert” ,Thaye Dorje ,”YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,”m.j. smith” ,moseszzz@mztv.com,gail.hance@ky.gov,dbergman@bergman-law.com,”Hoffman, Rand” ,wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,lwieseltier@tnr.com,Paul Burger Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM
State of Kentucky - Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
Ms. Chaney,
I would like to know who I contact with respect to the Opinion Letter I would like from the State of Kentucky. I would appreciate you or Gail Hance’s response.There are quite a number of issues I need addressed and they include (but are certainly not limited to):
1) The position Leonard Cohen has taken with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC. I would like to know if the State of Kentucky thinks that I was a trustee rather than owner/shareholder and, if so, who I should report “fraud” to since I would clearly have been defrauded should this be the case.
2) Why does the State of Kentucky feel Traditional Holdings, LLC was formed in Kentucky? Leonard Cohen’s tax lawyer, Richard Westin, resides there but he is not and was not my representative, registered agent, etc.
3) Who is receiving any notices from the State of Kentucky? Richard Westin, who appears to have made some “out of court” settlement with Cohen, refuses to communicate with me and - as the 99.5% owner of Traditional Holdings, LLC - I happen to think he may have engaged in mail fraud.
4) If there was no business purpose what is the State of Kentucky’s position with respect to the entity itself. Why was it formed and why did it exist?
5) Cohen has gone to great lengths to prove that he didn’t have a retirement account known as a private annuity obligation. What is the State of Kentucky’s position with respect to the fact that Cohen extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return. Richard Westin worked for Cohen and all work he did would have been on behalf of Cohen - clearly.
6) What is the State of Kentucky’s position with respect to LC Investments, LLC? K1s were issued for that entity in Kentucky. Neither Dale Burgess, my former accountant, or I thought that was a mistake and Cohen’s adviser - Robert Kory - told mine that they intended to roll Traditional Holdings, LLC back into LC Investments, LLC.
7) Are State taxes due? And, if so, what is the amount of the taxes together with penalties and interest. My advisers felt there were approximately $10 million in penalties & interest due with respect to Cohen’s fraud on three entities but I don’t believe they addressed state and/or local taxes.I would like an Opinion Letter on these issues and would appreciate being directed to the proper authority.Thank you.
All the best,
Kelley Lynch
cc: Doron Weinberg, Esquire and Dennis Riordan, Esquire
November 9th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
P.S. Phawker, if I were Cohen’s lawyer I would actually contact Walsh and ask her to stop. I can assure you that this fanatical fan is not doing him any favors. In fact, I met a journalist in Montreal who was literally in shock after meeting some of his fans. Cohen refers to them as his “constituents.” And then there’s “Blogonaut’s Blog.” The man, Stephen Gianelli, is actually a lawyer. He thinks it’s just fine to contact the FBI in Oakland and lie that I have spammed the Treasury Department. In most realms this ends up with eye rolling and usually a reference to wasted taxpayer’s dollars. He even called the District Attorney’s investigator on Phil Spector’s matter, William Frayeh, to confirm that Investigator Frayeh said the prosecutor (Pat Dixon) on Phillip’s murder trial was good looking. In other words, I am dealing with nuts as my Mother pointed out. Ms. Walsh apparently does not have a life and finds this situation entertaining. My son, Rutger, just told me that he holds Leonard Cohen responsible for the loss of his fingers. Why? Because he would have been in college had Cohen, Lindsey, and others (no doubt the District Attorney) decided to target me and destroy my life. In any event, I have never seen so many liars and idiots in my life. Ms. Walsh, who lives in Denmark, thinks she can intuitively speak on behalf of federal agencies. Can you speak on behalf of Phil Spector? No she can not. I know Phil Spector and I can assure you that he’s not taking Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury lightly. No one intelligent is actually.
November 9th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
No matter how Kelley Lynch presents her case, no matter how talentless, pornographic and senseless she (and Phil Spector) think Leonard Cohen is, it is his talent of writing, producing and performing that has made “The Millions”. Without his talents there would be no Millions for anybody to “steal”
Leonard Cohen’s hands may have “rocked DeMornay’s cradle” , but it seems that Ms, Lynch is biting that same hand who fed her and her family very well for many years (even if we do not consider the millions she stole from him.)
If Kelley Lynch is not “hiding out” and has so many supporters and important “friends” (including Phil Spector) it makes one wonder why someone could not lend her a few bucks to get out of the homeless shelter and/or stay with her family.
Leonard Cohen lives a VERY public life, everybody knows where he is and what kind of money he is making (including The IRS), believe me they will get any money owed to them, no they are not stupid.
And oh Ms. Lynch, I do have a very good life. I do like Leonard Cohen, but I am not a “fanatic fan”. Not that it matters, I do not have a problem with Cohen Ms. Lynch does.
Susanne Walsh
November 9th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Phawker,
Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal is not actually a fan issue. It also does not have anything to do with whether or not Cohen has talent. I personally do not believe he has talent and I happen to think he’s a plagarist who carefully studies the Bible, men like St. John of the Cross, folk songs, etc. That is my personal opinion.
Regardless of how Cohen made money that does not give him the right to steal from people like Marty Machat, Bob Johnston, or myself. I was compensated with shares of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. (15% - all intellectual property including record contracts, book publishing, etc. were assigned to that entity and Cohen fully understand that) because 1) Cohen wanted to compensate me for my hard work over the years; and 2) Cohen didn’t feel he had fully compensated me as his personal manager for a number of years - while I worked as his personal manager. This is not an issue that Susanne Walsh can weigh in on and her logic is preposterous.
I fed my family. I worked for a living and Leonard Cohen did not do me a favor by paying me properly for my services - as his personal manager. Walsh may have dedicated approximately 20 years of her life to Cohen for free but that wasn’t my arrangement with this man.
Have you heard of slander laws? Walsh has not. She has no evidence, no facts, etc. I do and have filed some of that against Cohen in my Motion to Quash his absolutely outrageous and fraudulent restraining order that was an attempt to stop Ann Diamond from publishing an article with Rolling Stone about me, him, etc. and because he does not want to hand over a complete and proper forensic accounting or explain his lawyer’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter, illegal K1s, etc.
Ms. Walsh conveniently overlooks the fact that Cohen offered me 50% community property - presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers. It’s not a convenient “item” for the liars and cult victims who will not silence me - ever.
No one has to lend me a few bucks. As the attorney I am consulting understands - Cohen owes me millions. That attorney has evidence - the same evidence I sent the IRS, DOJ, State of Kentucky, and others. This took is inconvenient for Ms. Walsh.
I agree about this - the IRS is not stupid. I spoke to someone at the State of Kentucky who also wasn’t stupid and he told me the IRS will probably go back to 1977 or the time he obtained his first green card in the United States and the penalties and interest will be unremitting. The tax fraud follows him from adviser to adviser.
I do not believe Ms. Walsh has a life. She is on my Blog constantly and has inserted herself into this situation. She has slandered me on Blogonaut’s Blog and the Hartford Courant’s site. I wrote the Hartford Courant and asked them to pull the slanderous comments. I intend to sue Blogonaut, Stephen Gianelli, Joff Belark, Michelle Blaine, and all the others who think it’s acceptable to lie and slander others.
Trust me - Phil Spector would help me if he could. His ex-wife (the Mother of his children) told me (after I called her about the King Drew nightmare) to call Phillip and ask him to lend me money for a custody lawyer. He is a very dear friend of mine and Walsh cannot speak for Mr. Spector. I can say this - Phil Spector is not taking Leonard Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury lightly. It’s a deadly serious matter and Walsh is a joke.
Kelley Lynch
November 9th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
For the record, I am not in “hiding” and Susanne Walsh may want to hire an attorney. I’ll speak to Phil Spector about this issue when I am able to do so. I am tired of this woman dragging my family into this situation and telling me what she thinks my children and/or parents and sister think. In fact, I think when I sue Cohen for slander I’ll include Walsh in that suit. That’s probably the best way to handle it. It starts, as usual, with his lies and then the maniacs rush in. That would include Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut, Joff Belark, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket, Mick Brown, and the other liars all over Phil Spector’s story and mine.
One must wonder why Cohen hasn’t asked his lawyer to rein in Walsh - particularly as Walsh has now “admitted” (publicly) that the IRS is not stupid. She has also, previously, spoken for them as have Stephen Gianelli and others. That, to me, is stupid. It’s right up there with lying to the FBI.
Phil Spector was set up. It’s a deadly serious matter. Cohen probably perjured himself in that matter. One can assume that it is an extremely serious issue. Apparently not for Cohen - he had his advisers in touch (or visa versa) with Blogonaut who wanted to put me in touch with Cohen. Leonard Cohen, from my perspective, is a sick individual. The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office should also charge him with perjury. Then again, they probably don’t want to undermine their “witness” who showed up in their legal documents re. Phil Spector.
Leonard Cohen does not lead a very public life. That’s a ridiculous statement. The “fanatic fan” has no idea what she’s talking about. Obviously.
Kelley Lynch
November 10th, 2009 at 2:33 am
Once again, Kelley Lynch has hijacked a blog! Ms. Lynch insists she has documents proving Cohen owes the IRS millions of dollars–perhaps as much as $10M. What we don’t know is when, or if, she’ll give the original documents to the IRS. Kelley, the IRS rewards “whistle blowers” with a percentage of the money recovered. Let’s say Cohen owes $10M–and let’s say the IRS would reward you with 10%–that’s $1M; however, in order for you to be a believable “whistle blower” you must let the IRS do its job–and you must quit expounding about Cohen’s alleged crimes via the internet. $1M is a lot of money, and I’m sure it would really help you and your family.
Ms. Lynch also makes reference to Cohen offering her community property–50% of everything. How could Cohen offer her anything? She robbed him blind. She also makes reference to Cohen victimizing Marty Machat and Bob Johnston. Why haven’t we heard from their representatives? Perhaps they don’t believe they’ve been victimized.
Ms. Lynch insists Cohen has destroyed her family–targeted her children and parents; however, it’s really Lynch who has set out to slander and destroy the life of Lorca Cohen, and yes, Ms. Lynch, it is a matter of character–YOUR character.
On another blog, Lynch annouced she was going to law school in September. I had such high hopes for her. Unfortunately, she’s not attending law chool–but most likely went to a law school for some free advice. I cannot help but wonder if the legal advice she’s getting is from an L1–but that’s not possible. For even an L1 will tell her the case with Cohen has been litigated–it’s OVER and done with; there will be no “do over”. The courts do not allow venue shopping. In addition, Kelley Lynch owes Leonard Cohen at least $6M.
November 10th, 2009 at 5:10 am
Leonard Cohen lead a public life in the sense that everybody who are interested , including the IRS, will know how to get in touch with him.
Even if Kelley Lynch spend the rest of her life writing her perception of the “truth” on internet Forums and Blogs, the fact still remains that a court of law has determined that she stole millions of dollars from Leonard Cohen, and unless she files, and more important WIN, a suit that proves otherwise all her threats to sue Cohen and everybody who doubt her “truth” will be nothing but hot air, and all her accusations and allegations will remain lies and slander.
I am sure Ms. Lynch is aware that she can make her Blog “private” so that only she can read it.
Susanne Walsh
November 10th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
The only fact that remains about Cohen’s lawsuit is that it was bogus and entirely based on fraud and perjury. There is no law in the United States of America that permits someone to go into court, lie, commit fraud and perjury, and win. That is impossible. Furthermore, I do not believe California had jurisdiction over what is probably a federal matter (as in the IRS) or over entities that were formed in other states. Clearly, Walsh cannot address these issues and wants to overlook things like Cohen’s offer - to me - of 50% community property, etc. Walsh is well aware that I intend to file lawsuits and she should know that I have asked the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the State of Kentucky to supply me with Opinion Letters regarding the corporate structures, tax returns, tax planning, ownership interest, etc. Until I have expert opinions from authorities on this matter it would be impossible for me to respond. One cannot guess about extraordinarily complex tax issues.
My accusations are not lies and slander and never will be - whether I go into court and discuss them, merely think about them, or write them down somewhere. They are the truth and nothing Walsh or anyone else says can change that.
Walsh is free to read my Blog whenever she wants. Her attention to this matter is what I find bizarre. I am a stranger to her. She does not appear to know Cohen and definitely did not know him for the 20 some years I worked with him. And, she has not examined the corporate books, records, stock certificates, or evidence I have and that has been supplied to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others.
Leonard Cohen does not lead a public life. He lives a private life and he lives a devious and deceitful life. Betsy Superfon, who was negotiating for him on my behalf (without my knowledge or consent) told me he told her this: he was remorseful, terrified, and I am the love of his life. I was not, however, his lover and Walsh can never comment on that. Furthermore, she was not at the recording sessions with Mr. Phil Spector. Hal Blaine, who has publicly noted that he never saw Mr. Spector with a gun in the studio in 37 years, Danny and David Kessel, and others were. I can assure you that Cohen was only too happy to have his daughter join me and Phillip at the Bel Air Hotel one evening and was intrigued when he heard I was meeting with Mr. Spector after the Clarkson incident. At that time, Mr. Spector told me what the forensic science concluded: Clarkson shot herself - she was dancing around in his foyer, waving a gun around, and singing “Da Doo Run Run.”
My son Rutger emailed me yesterday. I forwarded that email to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko - Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Investigator William Frayeh, and others. He confirmed, again, that on May 25, 2005 while I was being taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector he was asked - by Steven Clark Lindsey - to go into Robert Kory’s office and sign documents relating to the transfer and/or sale of my house to Leonard Cohen. I lost custody of my son while at King Drew and Robert Kory’s Declaration was filed in that matter. Robert Kory does not and did not know my son. He met him once - when Ray witnessed a conversation (between me and Kory) with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal, missing state tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen - by Cohen, and their threats. That is obviously witness tampering, obstruction of justice, etc.
Betsy Superfon also told me this - Cohen would have been only too happy to compensate me with my 99.5% share of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% share of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Walsh cannot address the corporate documents. Agent Bill Betzer/IRS, however, was able to determine my rightful ownership interest in these entities and that would be precisely 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. which contains all intellectual property including book publishing, recording contracts, etc. Leonard Cohen dictated the wording in the Minute books that confirmed my compensation of 15% of the intellectual property and he understood, all too well, that the transfer was “non-revocable.”
Suzanne Walsh is a gossip who knows nothing whatsoever about what happened - in particular with respect to tax issues, corporate structures, or my compensation. Beyond that, these issues are none of her business.
Kelley Lynch
cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
November 10th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Ms. Lynch is right about one thing. I do not know her, neither does anybody else she comes in contact with via her vicious slander on the internet. All we see is a disturbed woman who got cought stealing her boss’s money and did not have the stamina and courage to stay around for the law suit against her, but psstt vanished, never came up with any defense for herself, maybe because she knew there were no money left in Cohen’s account. Now she knows there are plenty of money, and NOW she wants to make a suit and “defend” herself, with a lot of imaginary accusations like tax fraud. perjurer and child molester, all gossip and speculations, which I believe is also all lies and slander, but good luck to Ms. Lynch for trying, I am convinced she will never sue anybody and will never win anything, she will just have to find a job or blame somebody else for her problems
Susanne Walsh .
November 10th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Susanne Walsh, as usual, speaks for everyone. I sincerely doubt she speaks for Phil Spector’s lawyers, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan, however and they might want to address her “intuitive” comments.
Ms. Walsh appears to be the disturbed and obsessed individual. That is all I see when I see her posts and the emails she has sent me.
Leonard Cohen was never my “boss.” I worked as his personal manager for nearly 18 years. I stole nothing. After receiving a tax notice relating to my 2001 tax returns I changed accountants who sent me to tax lawyers. They concluded that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and exposed me to that fraud. They advised me that a deal could not be made once fraud was brought to my attention - although the offer of 50% community property must have interested them since they were being paid.
Susanne Walsh is well aware that I refused to participate in Cohen’s lawsuit although I was around for it and spoke to his lawyers about the fact that I was not served the suit. She apparently does not understand the legal concept of due diligence. I hardly vanished but Walsh is a drama queen from what I’ve read on the internet. She is also, clearly, a liar. The reason I refused to participate in Cohen’s lawsuit is because I went to the IRS, reported his tax fraud that I was told is criminal, and felt the lawsuit was nothing other than a desperate attempt to cover up tax fraud and criminal conduct - including Kory’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter.
I have said the same thing for nearly five years now. No amount of money is going to change the facts or the evidence. There are corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, emails, etc. that prove my ownership interest in companies and I believe Cohen personally has proven that he defrauded me.
With respect to the allegation of child molestation - Ms. Walsh should contact Lorca Cohen. According to Freda Guttman (and Cohen himself brought this to my attention) Lorca Cohen is the one that told classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. This pre-dated the fall of 2004 when I refused to meet with Cohen and his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, to unravel the companies they created solely for Cohen’s benefit. I have given the IRS Commissioner’s Staff the passwords to my AOL email accounts. Perhaps they’ve seen the emails between me and my former brother-in-law, Van Penick. Van is an attorney who Cohen asked me to approach about various matters including the fact that Freda Guttman told Ann Diamond the story about Lorca Cohen being molested by her father. Ann Diamond sent me an email confirming this story which I passed onto Phil Spector’s legal team, the Department of Justice, and the IRS Commissioner’s Staff.
Susanne Walsh may believe whatever she wants to believe. It is irrelevant if she thinks I will or will not sue anyone. It is preposterous to believe that Phil Spector will not pursue the allegations that Leonard Cohen committed perjury in his grand jury. Fortunately, an attorney and friend of mine understood this - if Phillip can prove this the charges and both verdicts have to be vacated and thrown out. That’s incredibly heavy.
It seems time for Ms. Walsh to get a job. I, at least, am part of this story. She is merely lying for no reason whatsoever - except for the probable fact that she’s some type of truly obsessive fan and not a particularly stable individual.
Kelley Lynch
November 10th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
Yeah, yeah. yeah The same old story from Ms. Lynch
Sue the World and win, and we will believe her phony sob stories.
I do have a job, I do have a home and I do have my children with me.
I have never stolen from anybody.
And Ms. Lynch has no idea if I have spoken with Lorca Cohen or what the truth is, she is just gossipping and slandering as usual
Susanne Walsh
November 10th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
I know this. Susanne Walsh did not know Cohen for the approximately 20 years I knew and worked for him. It is shocking, to me, that Cohen and his advisers are permitting this woman go lie and gossip on the internet.
I don’t care if Walsh has spoken to Lorca Cohen. That is not the point I intended to make. She shouldn’t lie and accuse me of raising those allegations. That was my point.
I have never stolen from anyone and find it preposterous that Susanne Walsh thinks it is acceptable to speak for Phil Spector’s legal team - particularly when we are talking about deadly serious allegations of perjury in Phillip’s grand jury. That, of course, relates to Leonard Cohen.
This is a game for Ms. Walsh. It probably turns her on.
Kelley Lynch
November 10th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
P.S. This is probably the only way Walsh can get close to a celebrity. Leonard Cohen himself didn’t want his “fans” showing up at his house. Walsh herself is explanation. I can just see Walsh going up to Lorca Cohen and discussing whether or not she told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her.
November 10th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Ms. Lynch is a pathetic and sad case.
I have not lied about Cohen so why should his “legal team” object?
Kelley Lynch has absolutely no idea who I am and who I know and how I know them, and I do not feel it is any of her bussiness.
So I sign out now from this discussion-
Find somebody else to abuse Ms. Lynch.
Susanne Walsh
November 10th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
Because I intend to sue Leonard Cohen and will address the issues of Walsh’s harassment, cyber-terrorism, slander, etc. in that suit. I have no idea who Walsh is. She is correct about that. I do not care about her - at all. She is the one who has involved herself in my business. Susanne Walsh is a truly twisted woman. She has even emailed me when she sympathizes with me.
If I were Cohen’s personal manager at this time - I would have already contacted Walsh. After all, I know the truth of this story and I know for a fact that Cohen is a liar, fraud, and has more than likely perjured himself in Phil Spector’s murder trial. I also think Walsh is insane for speaking on behalf of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and Agent Kelly Sopko - the Treasury. It is preposterous. It is also ludicrous to assume that they are copied in on my emails for any reason other than the fact that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that is criminal; began emailing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff evidence as soon as I had an email address; and went to the Department of Justice when I realized corrupt government and corrupt law enforcement were all over this story.
Obviously these are deadly serious issues for people other than Susanne Walsh and her pals at Blogonaut.
I don’t think anyone should put money on the possibility that I will not litigate these issues with Cohen and others. I have asked Phil Spector to join me in my suit against the District Attorney of Los Angeles. Please see Mr. Spector’s statement below. I think he’s clear about his innocence and the fact that he views Alan Jackson as the murderer.
I have also asked the DEA and Immigration to investigate Clarkson’s suicide. After all, in the other deaths (Anna Nicole Smith, Heath Ledger, and Michael Jackson) there wasn’t a victim. In this case, it is clear that Mr. Spector is the victim and could have been shot. Immigration, of course, should investigate the driver who changed his story 8 times and apparently perjured himself 4 times in Immigration documents. Clearly these are serious issues and one would assume that the DEA and Immigration should take them seriously - particularly as the District Attorney of Los Angeles appears to have witnessed tampered when “they” asked Immigration for a green card on behalf of DeSouza. That, to me, is unconscionable. My friend, His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, was returning to the United States while terribly ill and even on his death bed. Why? Because he was told he had to spend at least six months a year in the United States. He wanted to honor the laws of this country.
Kelley Lynch
November 10th, 2009 at 4:00 pm
P.S. Immigration should also investigate how Cohen abandoned a green cardi n 1988 and why he obtained a new one in 1991. Social Security should investigate why he had more than one social security number. His former accountant, Burt Goldstein, seemed to take the IRS Commissioner’s Staff seriously.
November 11th, 2009 at 3:52 am
In my first response to Kelley Lynch’s post on Phawker’s “Leonard Cohen is not a great man”, I stated that Kelley Lynch is a disturbed woman with a hateful desire for revenge on Leonard Cohen, and that she threaten every person who disagree with her, of suing them.
If anybody have followed this thread (which I doubt), they will know I spoke the truth. and if Kelley Lynch has the ability to know the difference between truth and lies she will know it too (perhaps that is why she seems even more desperate and aggressive than usual).
However, Ms. Lynch’s constant repeated ranting is getting boring (even as “entertainment”). Ms. Lynch is welcome to write about me (and others) and threaten to sue (laugh) whomever she wishes, and I may even read it if I am VERY bored, but I will no longer respond to her insane and incoherent rambling on this site.
I have just one request to Ms. Lynch: PLEASE STOP sending me private E-mails.
Susanne Walsh
November 12th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Susanne Walsh cannot stop herself. This tells me that she is an unstable human being who is entertaining herself with the suffering of others. Susanne Walsh has no idea who I am. I do not know her and that is precisely why Ms. Walsh appears to me to be a dangerously unstable “fan” who has inserted herself into a situation that she knows nothing about. I have said, repeatedly, that I am suing Leonard Cohen. When I do I will raise issues having to do with the harassment I am receiving by people - such as Walsh, Blogonaut/Gianneli, Blaine, et al. - who have taken up his fraudulent cause.
How would anyone, who has not reviewed the evidence or witnessed what I have witnessed, know if Walsh is lying or telling the truth. How would Walsh? She has spoken, on behalf of various federal agencies, based on intuition. I met with the Treasury Agencies and did what I was told - reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to Agent Luis Tejeda/IRS Fraud Unit in Los Angeles. Since everyone is so curious about the IRS and what may be pending - I intend to subopena the IRS Commissioner himself and Agent Tejeda to the witness stand to explain that. It is really quite simple. At that time, when they testify, they can explain to everyone what they have been doing and why I have been slandered in the meantime. They can also explain why my fictional sex life has become an issue. Oliver Stone himself can explain why Cohen/Kory went into Lindsey’s office - after I switched accountants, hired lawyers, and was told Cohen committed tax fraud - that I had sex with Mr. Stone.
If I am so boring why has Ms. Walsh taken the position that she will follow me around the internet? Do you think I actually care if some nut cult victim fan doesn’t believe I intend to sue or thinks, for one moment, that Phil Spector is not going to attach Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury. The notion is positively deranged.
This is the second time Walsh has stated that she won’t respond and is bowing out of the situation. She, as well as others, cannot contain or control themselves. They are obsessive maniacs.
Ms. Walsh has received emails from me (with the IRS, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko - Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others copied in) because she continues to email me and I don’t want anyone to deny later that I didn’t bring the truth to their attention. Ms. Walsh recently contacted me to offer her sympathy for the fact that I developed a staph infection that nearly required a surgeon to amputate my foot.
I have the ability to see right through truth and lies, slander, defamation, libel, and threats. I also happen to see right through Leonard Norman Cohen who appears to have a history of tax fraud in two countries and attempted to have Phil Spector and I take the fall for him.
Hopefully Susanne Walsh will find another hobby to engage in. Her cyber-stalking and slander is truly nauseating.
All the best,
Kelley Lynch
November 13th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
As usual, Kelley Lynch is calling the kettle black.
BTW Kelley Green, Lynch owes Cohen $7.6 million PLUS annual interest thereon at the CA judgment rate of 10% per annum from the date of entry of the judgment (May of 2005) until paid. This binding and enforceable CA judgment is premised on the Cohen complaint against her alleging civil theft and mismanagement of Cohen’s estate.
Kelley Green is correct about one thing: It is years too late for Lynch to set aside the CA judgment or to sue Cohen for anything arising out of their former business relationship.
Kelley Lynch lives in a homeless shelter by night and blogs about ancient history (her grievances against Cohen) from the Houston Public Library by day.
Since Lynch has family in Texas (a mother and a sister) one can draw their own conclusions as to why Lynch is living in a shelter and not with family.
Lynch’s inability or unwillingness to move forward with her life is sad really, and I might feel sorry for her if she was not so malicious and mean spirited.
November 14th, 2009 at 12:19 pm
Blogonaut/Gianelli, I will send your posting to the FBI - who is now copied in on my emails. I owe Cohen nothing and am waiting for Opinion Letters from the State of Kentucky and IRS. I just received one email from the State of Kentucky advising me that on the face of it I was a member of Traditional Holdings, LLC. As you probably know that does not make me a trustee. Nothing is binding about fraud, perjury, obstruction of justice, blackmail, coercion, etc. - apart from the criminal conduct that Boies Schiller felt I should record when meeting with Kory because, they felt, I was being asked to engage in criminal conduct.
I don’t think it’s years too late for anything and until I have the facts, opinions of experts at the IRS, State of Kentucky, etc., I am not in a position to respond to Cohen’s fraud. I suppose Phil Spector is going to let go of his “ancient history” with Cohen when it is overwhelmingly apparent to me (if Mick Brown/UK Telegraph did not lie when he emailed me that Cohen testified against Mr. Spector in his grand jury) that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phillip’s grand jury. One has to be brain dead to assume that Mr. Spector will not attack that perjury - particularly given Cohen’s “pattern” of perjuring himself in court rooms around America.
No one can draw any conclusions about why I am not living with my parents and sister - who I am in contact with - particularly some wacked out nut who has inserted himself into the Phil Spector murder trial, accused me of having sexual fantasies about a man I believe set up Phil Spector (his prosecutor - Pat Dixon), encouraged me to contact Cohen who is willing to help me, and who has lied to the FBI in Denver. Hopefully, it didn’t take Agent Wynar/FBI Oakland more than five minutes to investigate whether or not I was spamming Agent Sopko-Treasury Agent because I don’t think the FBI should have wasted more taxpayer dollars than necessary to prove that Gianelli/Blogonaut have attempted to obstruct justice and drag them into Cohen’s insane attempts to cover up what appears to be a lifetime history of tax fraud.
Kelley Lynch
cc: FBI Washington, IRS Commissiioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko - Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire - via email
November 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
P.S. Blogonaut/Gianelli’s “obsession” with me and my whereabouts is of great import to me. The spokesperson for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan strikes again!
November 14th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Re: Kelly Green’s Garbage Post
Have I hijacked a blog? I tend to doubt it. Publicly refuting lies is not hijacking. You, Walsh, Gianelli, Blogonaut, Blaine, Sprocket, etc., have attempted to silence me and prevent me from speaking truthfully.
I have documents supporting my allegations that Cohen committed tax fraud. I was told, by DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess, that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud. I was told that Cohen exposed me to criminal tax fraud and I absolutely believe this. I also believe that Cohen has a lifelong history of tax fraud in the U.S. and Canada and am convinced that the IRS should review all of Cohen’s tax returns, etc., from the moment he received the 1977 tax memo telling him he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had residences - including the U.S. - but cautioning him not to have a green card. I also believe Immigration should investigate why he abandoned that green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and obtained a new green card in 1991. And, I absolutely believe the Social Security Administration should investigate his numerous social security numbers. I have provided the IRS, and others, with a tremendous amount of evidence - including corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, attorney/client privileged communications, my email passwords and authorization to review all emails in my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com accounts - and, in particular, all emails between me, Leonard Cohen, and his advisers. Richard Westin’s emails should have proved enlightening to the IRS - particularly those advising me that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a real entity with a real annuity obligation after Westin, on Cohen’s behalf, had already extinguished the annuity obligation. The IRS is obviously aware of the documents I have given them and Agent Sopko - Treasury confirmed that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading my emails. Many of those emails contained attachments (ie., evidence) including confirmation that Greenberg and Westin took the position that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” to the structure and the IRS might want to take a look at other tax issues related to Cohen. Kory himself wrote me that the IRS would demand answers, re. Cohen’s taxes, going back many years and also inquired, in writing, if I would forgive Cohen’s loans from Traditional Holdings, LLC. He also confirmed that he didn’t want to contact the IRS with respect to any of the Traditional Holdings, LLC tax returns - in case it alerted the IRS to some of the shenanigans.
Actually, DiMascio & Berardo told me the penalties and interest on Cohen’s tax fraud as of 2004 came to approximately $10 million. They also told me similar amounts were due with respect to two other entities and the State of Kentucky thought the IRS would go back years - so, who knows, perhaps the tax hit will be enormous. I am waiting to hear back from the State of Kentucky with respect to the missing state tax returns (and “pending” taxes) that I discussed with Kory the day my son and I stopped into discuss that, Cohen’s tax fraud, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats - that I discussed with the Treasury Agents as well as my conviction that Kory’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter arose from Cohen’s tax fraud. I am also convinced it is evidence of witness tampering, etc.
I do not view myself as a whistle blower and am not interested in any possible IRS reward as I confirmed for Agent Betzer/IRS (who is the one that told me to contact the IRS’ Fraud Unit) and the Treasury Agents. I am uninterested in receiving any type of reward for doing what I believe was the correct and legal thing to do. The IRS may be doing it’s job. Who knows what they have “pending” and I intend to doubt that Gianelli/Blogonaut is a secret IRS Agent spilling the beans. Well, since Cohen owes me millions that will ultimately help me and my family because I intend to use that to hire an attorney with. As Boies Schiller told me - inform your lawyer that Cohen owes you millions and you want them to help you take down another Hollywood fraud. Boies Schiller reviewed three large boxes of evidence that I sent them. Much of this was sent to the IRS as well. I advised Mr. Rob Watts/State of Kentucky that I would be more than happy to share anything, with him, that I sent the IRS. I’ll take my own attorney’s advice and will quit expounding about Cohen’s activities when either hell freezes over or he confesses to his wrong-doing.
Dale Burgess, who was present when Kory offered me 50% community property on behalf of Cohen, can take the stand and explain that offer. I will explain (and have to the IRS and others) that Kory advised me (and others) that he had extraordinary negotiating powers. I didn’t rob Cohen blind and that’s why he offered me 50% community property - presumably to lie to the IRS and others and say he was defrauded by his advisers. As I’ve repeatedly stated - this is a criminal tax fraud matter and his bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials was a red herring and attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and criminal conduct.
Marty Machat died in 1988 and may not know that he was victimized. Bob Johnston can speak for himself. I will give Mr. Johnston a copy of Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting his and Mr. Machat’s final payment for their 15% shares of Stranger Music, Inc. Steven Machat is already aware that Boies Schiller is in possession of this letter.
Please see Freda Guttman re. her allegations (to Ann Diamond) that Lorca Cohen told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. It’s either true or a matter of her character. I already know she is willing to lie and perjure herself for her father. I have, after all, witnessed many things with respect to Lorca Cohen and intend to address her in my lawsuits. I a speaking the truth and I think Robert Kory’s Declaration is evidence that Cohen targeted my children. There are also allegations about Rutger that I would like Edward Johnson and Anthony Elie, and others, to address on the stand. Saba Candarsky as well as he was present for Cohen’s insanity after I refused to meet with him, hand over the corporate books and records, and unravel his creative entities and tax planning.
Cohen has no character.
I’ll go to law school whenever I feel like going to law school. This is clearly no one’s business. Neither is my fictional sex life but I will subpoena Oliver Stone to the witness stand. I would like to hear Mr. Stone’s position on why Cohen dragged him into this situation - by going into my young son’s father’s office and telling him that I had sex with Oliver Stone. Clearly that is not a defense to tax fraud but may prove that Cohen was a jealous and perverted man who was obsessed with me. He has lied when he said we were lovers. We were not and that allegation makes my blood curdle and skin crawl.
I didn’t go to the law school for legal advice but I have spoken with attorneys and continue to keep a criminal attorney apprised of all the slander, etc. taking place on the internet. Actually none of the attorneys I’ve spoken with agrees that my cases with Cohen are over. I’ll leave it at that because I’ve spoken with them and now precisely what they thought. Last I heard, the Courts were under the impression that perjury was a crime so perhaps some Court will be interested in Cohen’s fraud and perjury. I believe Phil Spector will attack Cohen’s perjury in his grand jury - if Mick Brown was correct when he wrote me that Cohen testified before Phillip’s grand jury. And I believe David Moorhead who told me that Phillip had no choice but to attack that testimony. If Mr. Spector prevails (which I think is almost a sure bet) - Mr. Moorhead felt the charges would have to be vacated. That might be truly amazing.
Kelley Lynch
November 14th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
Phawker,
Please note. I will be forced to request IP information re. my “victim” and Kelly Green. This is the position the liars have put others in - including parties that respect freedom of speech.
All the best,
Kelley
P.S. The IRS was copied in on my emails with Steven Machat. It certainly appeared, to me, that Steven Machat felt Cohen had stolen from his father. Bob Johnston can and should speak for himself.
November 16th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Dear Ms. Lynch:
Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what you threaten to subpoena.
Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months to file.
I am at the end of very only line of persons whom you threaten to sue, you have been making these threats for years, you are quite obviusly not well, and you can place your nonsense threats where the moon don’t shine, because everything I have posted here true as a matter of public record.
November 17th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Nice language. My emails are not incoherent and I know this for a fact. People who are reading them have said they are quite coherent, straightforward, and easy to understand. I am not threatening to sue. I intend to sue. If you want to underestimate me - be my guest. A subpoena is not a threat and I would hope that you, as a lawyer (Blogonaut/Gianelli), would understand that this is a legal tool.
My legal team is my business. Perhaps it would take you a taem of 10 attorneys and 10 paralegals to sort through it all. I have a very good grip on my legal issues.
You are at the top of my list for people who I believe have obstructed justice and attempted to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen - who is willing to help me. As usuual, I merely have to lie to the IRS and others. My friend, an attorney, nailed this one early on and felt that until the IRS issued a subpoena I would be open to bribery - by Cohen, Lindsey, their legal representatives, and others. I am assuming you are Blogonaut/Gianelli who Investigator Bill Frayeh (District Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles) seemed to believe was a “shady character.” I have no idea what Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland thinks but hopefully it took him precisely 2 minutes to figure out that you lied to him when you advised him that I am spamming Agent Sopko/Treasury Department. Agent Sopko seemed like a great big girl to me. In fact, she was able to call me in California; put herself on an airplane from Washington; call me to confirm that she would meet me at Edie Lamm’s house; find Ms. Lamm’s house; have a meeting with me; email me Agent Tejeda’s information at the IRS in Los Angeles; call me back after my first contact with Agent Tejeda; and call you. That tells me that she can also read and knows precisely why I am writing her. I have said it countless times: I am documenting the destruction of my life for the IRS and others since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS. I know to arrogant idiots the sum of $30 million is nothing but in the real world it’s huge. People are telling me precisely how corrupt they think Los Angeles is and everyone I’ve spoken with believes Phil Spector was framed and Leonard Cohen, if he did appear in Phillip’s grand jury - as Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me, should be held responsible for that perjury. They think I was dragged to Killer King (and the entire file is falsified) to 1) determine what else I knew about Phil Spector; and 2) to prevent me from serving as a credible witness for the IRS and other agencies.
As I have also stated I am waiting for the IRS and State of Kentucky to issue Opinion Letters. When they do and I am clear about their position on these companies and the fraud, I will proceed to litigate my issues with Leonard Cohen.
I have not threatened you. I believe the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI should investigate and charge you - if you are indeed Gianelli/Blogonaut. I also believe they should investigate why Joff Belark targeted me, lied about me, and targeted my son who is also a witnes.
I am very well. You, however, are a moron. Every word I have uttered and written is the truth. Every word you have uttered, and written, is a lie. Hire 10 lawyers and 100 paralegals and get their consensus on fraud, slander, defamation, libel, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness retaliation, and whatever the hell it means when you align yourself with “Prosecutor Alan Jackson” who probably has “motive” to undermine me “as a witness.”
Please do not speak for the IRS, DOJ, Department of Justice, and/or FBI unless you write me at odzerchenma3@gmail.com on official letterhead. For the record, I know for a fact that you do not speak for Phil Spector or his legal team. That would include Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan who have must think you are an absolutely wacked out deranged nut. I know that’s what my Mother thinks. She also thinks Bruce Cutler nailed you.
Kelley Lynch
cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
cc: IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko - Treasury, the FBI, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire
NOTE: I’ll send this to you Gianelli/Blogonaut via email with the above individuals/agencies copied in. They can read for themselves that you don’t give a “rat’s ass” that they’re copied in. I would imagine that they already figured this out.
November 17th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
becknerm ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
michelleblaine@gmail.com,
sprocket.trials@gmail.com,
Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
The individual who doesn’t give a rat’s ass would need 10 attorneys and 10 paralegals to sort through this. That’s fairly clear to me. How about you? It can’t figure out that every word I have uttered and written is the truth and is standing on lies that I intend to attack in court. It speaks for my sister and brother-in-law, and Rutger, who are copied in on this email. It feels comfortable threatening me and slandering me and upsetting my children. That’s all I need to know about “it.” I think Agent Wynar/FBI, if he is intelligent at all, can figure out that I did not “spam” Agent Sopko/Treasury. I know if I was a Special Agent with the FBI it would have taken me one email or one phone call. And, if I were you, I would know that it doesn’t have the authority - legal or otherwise - to speak for Phil Spector or you.
Thank you.
Love,
Kelley
- Hide quoted text -
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Sopko, and the FBI,
I want you to understand that “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” (self-proclaimed liar, actually, who is - no doubt the man who sounds like he crawled out of a crypt: Gianelli/Blogonaut) is stating, unequivocally, that “nobody gives a rat’s ass who” I “copy in” on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS.
It seemed, from my conversation with Agent Sopko and her partner, that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading my emails. In fact, I was told that many people were reading them. Yes, it seems to be complicated but I have faith that intelligent people in federal agencies can figure out what ordinary folks are able to understand: that Leonard Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, appears to have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s matter, and the District Attorney probably had the power and motive to take me to Killer King. Chris at Homeland Security certainly seemed to understand that the District Attorney and/or the Govenor’s Office could conceivably be involved with much of what was taking place.
Blogonaut/Gianelli, if they wrote the posting below, should not be at the bottom of anyone’s list. It appears to be connected, somehow, to Phil Spector’s prosecutor; lied to the FBI; and actually called Investigator William Frayeh. He publicly stated that he was in touch with Cohen’s legal team and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is willing to help me. All I have to do, apparently, to get my life and children back is lie. That’s precisely what Mark Smith, my friend who is a Securities lawyer, told me. He didn’t think my story was incoherent but he did think Cohen, et al., would attempt to bribe me further.
Everything the individual writes about me is a lie so that says something about its intelligence. It has none. Anyway, I have already stated that I believe “it” should be investigated and don’t feel the need to repeat that ad nauseum. Either the IRS, and other agencies (ie., Agent Wynar who does indeed have my sympathethies if he had to talk to this crackhead from “The Crypt”), get it or they don’t. It’s that simple. The arrogance is inconceivable. So is the stupidity. Let’s revisit Yongzin Rinpoche’s conclusion about what has gone down here and why: arrogance, greed, and - of course, stupidity.
All the best,
Kelley
“Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what you threaten to subpoena.
Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months to file.
I am at the end of very only line of persons whom you threaten to sue, you have been making these threats for years, you are quite obviusly not well, and you can place your nonsense threats where the moon don’t shine, because everything I have posted here true as a matter of public record.”
fromKelley Lynch
todoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 16th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Dear Ms. Lynch:
Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what
you threaten to subpoena.
Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months to file.
I am at the end of very only line of persons whom you threaten to sue, you have been making these threats for years, you are quite obviusly not well, and you can place your nonsense threats where the moon don’t shine, because everything I have posted here true as a matter of public record.
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 17th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Nice language. My emails are not incoherent and I know this for a fact. People who are reading them have said they are quite coherent, straightforward, and easy to understand. I am not threatening to sue. I intend to sue. If you want to underestimate me - be my guest. A subpoena is not a threat and I would hope that you, as a lawyer (Blogonaut/Gianelli), would understand that this is a legal tool.
My legal team is my business. Perhaps it would take you a taem of 10 attorneys and 10 paralegals to sort through it all. I have a very good grip on my legal issues.
You are at the top of my list for people who I believe have obstructed justice and attempted to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen - who is willing to help me. As usuual, I merely have to lie to the IRS and others. My friend, an attorney, nailed this one early on and felt that until the IRS issued a subpoena I would be open to bribery - by Cohen, Lindsey, their legal representatives, and others. I am assuming you are Blogonaut/Gianelli who Investigator Bill Frayeh (District Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles) seemed to believe was a “shady character.” I have no idea what Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland thinks but hopefully it took him precisely 2 minutes to figure out that you lied to him when you advised him that I am spamming Agent Sopko/Treasury Department. Agent Sopko seemed like a great big girl to me. In fact, she was able to call me in California; put herself on an airplane from Washington; call me to confirm that she would meet me at Edie Lamm’s house; find Ms. Lamm’s house; have a meeting with me; email me Agent Tejeda’s information at the IRS in Los Angeles; call me back after my first contact with Agent Tejeda; and call you. That tells me that she can also read and knows precisely why I am writing her. I have said it countless times: I am documenting the destruction of my life for the IRS and others since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS. I know to arrogant idiots the sum of $30 million is nothing but in the real world it’s huge. People are telling me precisely how corrupt they think Los Angeles is and everyone I’ve spoken with believes Phil Spector was framed and Leonard Cohen, if he did appear in Phillip’s grand jury - as Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me, should be held responsible for that perjury. They think I was dragged to Killer King (and the entire file is falsified) to 1) determine what else I knew about Phil Spector; and 2) to prevent me from serving as a credible witness for the IRS and other agencies.
As I have also stated I am waiting for the IRS and State of Kentucky to issue Opinion Letters. When they do and I am clear about their position on these companies and the fraud, I will proceed to litigate my issues with Leonard Cohen.
I have not threatened you. I believe the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI should investigate and charge you - if you are indeed Gianelli/Blogonaut. I also believe they should investigate why Joff Belark targeted me, lied about me, and targeted my son who is also a witnes.
I am very well. You, however, are a moron. Every word I have uttered and written is the truth. Every word you have uttered, and written, is a lie. Hire 10 lawyers and 100 paralegals and get their consensus on fraud, slander, defamation, libel, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness retaliation, and whatever the hell it means when you align yourself with “Prosecutor Alan Jackson” who probably has “motive” to undermine me “as a witness.”
Please do not speak for the IRS, DOJ, Department of Justice, and/or FBI unless you write me at odzerchenma3@gmail.com on official letterhead. For the record, I know for a fact that you do not speak for Phil Spector or his legal team. That would include Bruce Cutler,
Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan who must think you are an absolutely wacked out deranged nut. I know that’s what my Mother thinks. She also thinks Bruce Cutler nailed you.
Kelley Lynch
cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
cc: IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko - Treasury, the FBI, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire
NOTE: I’ll send this to you Gianelli/Blogonaut via email with the above individuals/agencies copied in. They can read for themselves that you don’t give a “rat’s ass” that they’re copied in. I would imagine that they already figured this out.
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-210610
November 17th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Dear Ms. Lynch:
You have been threating to sue your “enimies” (including Cohen) since at least or May of 2005.
It is quite obvious that you are all show and no go.
You live in a homeless shelter, and not with your mother or sister who live close by in Texas.
It is also obvious from your writings that you are mired in the past and cannot move on.
Sue or don’t sue.
But until then, please STFU.
We all know that if your were going to sue Cohen or others you would have done so already.
No one cares about you any more.
November 18th, 2009 at 3:14 am
Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?
Now you’ve decided Blogonaut/Gianelli is attacking you on this blog. Let’s be real, Gianelli’s brave enough to use his actual name—he doesn’t have to hide behind a fictional identity. And you’ve sent how many emails to the IRS, FBI, etc, claiming he’s being “mean” to you. Once again, you have no proof it’s Gianelli. Nonetheless, you want the IRS, FBI, etc, investigating Gianelli because “another victim” said something you didn’t like; therefore, it must be Gianelli’s fault.
You continue to attack Lorca Cohen, yet your children remain off-limits. You also make reference to a draft article by Anne Diamond–please provide a citation for Diamond’s published article. You often refer readers to various incantations of your blogs where the reader can peruse Diamond’s article. The problem is that you’re the one who posts the article and the only person who can edit the article is you. One citation to Diamond’s published article, on a website other than yours or a web entry other than one of your many nics, will suffice.
You also make reference to attornies telling you Cohen exposed you to criminal tax fraud. Are you under investigation or criminal indictment by the IRS, FBI, DOJ, homeland security…? Do you intend to “flip” on Cohen for a lighter sentence? Or do you intend to plead guilty and accept the fines and serve a prison sentence? In other words, if Cohen doesn’t go to prison then, the odds are, neither will you. I’m sure somewhere in your mind you’ll twist this into a bribe; afterall, Kelley, everything’s a bribe to you.
November 18th, 2009 at 9:23 am
As far as I can see the only “truth” spoken by Kelley Lynch is that “I can’t help myself”. I just have a few more things to say in this debate, although Kelly Green really said it all very clear and precise.
It seems Ms. Lynch is getting more and more irrational, abusive and desperate, probably because nobody gives her any attention anymore, blogs and forums obviously refuse to print her lies and slander and therefore nobody respond to her outrageous outbursts, which again means her life is now completely emty.
Kelley Lynch accuses Leonard Cohen of being a pervert for writing erotic lyrics, That is not perverted, but writing on public internet sites mean and cruel gossip about a young woman (just because she hates her Father), keep on bringing up alleged “accusations” of she herself having sex with different famous men (i.e. Steven Segal and Oliver Stone), and her sexual fantasies about high profile lawers, that Ms. Lynch is perverted and sick, and NO I am NOT speaking for any of these men, but I would imagine that all of them (including Cohen) would prefer a “Hiroshima” to have any kind of relationship with Ms. Lynch.
Kelley Lynch is “Threatening” to sue hundreds of people from Leonard Cohen, several investigators down to ordinary bloggers who disagree with her lies, her reason for that is that “we” are trying to obstruct justice and make her look “not credible”. Here are a few different reasons to why Kelley Lynch does not appear credible:
Leonard Cohen commited tax fraud “That I was told is criminal”
“(Some) Investigators are criminal assholes”
Cohen has “probably” commited perjury in Phil Spector trial
Cohen has “Probably” molested his child
Male bloggers who objects to her lies are “possible” gay
Female bloggers are “obsessive cult fans”
It is Cohens fault that she lives in a homeless shelter and that her son lost his finger.
“Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is “probably” identical with Gianelli/Blogonaut.
All these and many more speculative “enemies” are being slandered and abused by Ms. Lynch.
Ms. Lynch has previously stated that “if she was Leonard Cohen’s legal advisor, she would ask me to stop defending him, since I am not helping him”. Well, Leonard Cohen does not need my defense or help to show the world how he is as a person, a writer, a performer, a Father, a friend and an employer. His loyal family, friends, band members, critics and fans speaks clearly of that. However, if I was Phil Spector’s advisor I would clearly advise Ms. Lynch to stop “defending” him and claiming to be his “dear friend”, if we are to believe the old saying “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”, and if Phil Spector’s credibility is equal to Ms. Lynch’s it just does not look good for poor old Phil.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 11:44 am
Well said Kelly G. and Susanne W.
After 5 years of KL threatening to sue anyone who dares disagree with her, she has become quite boring.
I have no doubt that 5 years from now KL with still be ranting about being in the verge of suing Leonard Cohen and others just has she asserted in 2005 when Cohen first obtained his $7,000,000.00 judgment against her.
It is almost 2010–the 5 year anniversary of KL’s empty threat to sue Cohen and have him prosecuted by the IRS and others.
According to KL there is always something that needs to happen before KL actually files suit. For almost two years she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler”. Then she was waiting to hear from Spector’s legal team. Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)
Don’t go away mad KL, just go away.
November 18th, 2009 at 11:59 am
If I’ve become so boring why are you following me around the internet and defending someone like Leonard Cohen?
I have made no threat to have Cohen prosecuted by the IRS. I do not work for the IRS and I do not command the IRS around - nor do I speak for the IRS, DOJ, Treasury or the FBI. I also don’t draw conclusions, without facts, about what they are doing, aren’t doing, or what they consider a pending matter or criminal conduct. I reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud to the IRS. I contacted the FBI because activity was crossing state borders and, from what I have witnessed, it is official misconduct involving government, law enforcement, and - of course, Leonard Cohen and others. I contacted the DOJ when I realized law enforcement was playing games with me. That’s a direct quote - from law enforcement. Agent Kelly Sopko/Treasury Department contacted me and we met. I contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS in Los Angeles and reported Cohen’s tax fraud to him. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff - and others - with a tremendous amount of evidence relating to Cohen’s tax fraud, social security numbers, off-shore accounts, 1977 tax memo advising him that he didn’t have to pay taxes anywhere - but cautioning him not to have a green card, his abandoned green card, his various social security numbers, and - of course - his disdain for ordinary income taxes and these sham corporations. The IRS advised me that Cohen issued illegal K1s to me from LC Investments, LLC.
I am not waiting for Bruce Cutler and I think your call to Bruce Cutler was a desperate attempt to determine whether or not Bruce Cutler is still involved with Phil Spector. I am not waiting to hear from Phil Spector’s legal team. I am copying Phil Spector’s legal team in on my emails - together with quite a number of government agencies and others.
I actually have spoken with numerous people in the State of Kentucky - including Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet and Mr. Rob Watts - Fraud/State of Kentucky who asked me to put my complaint in writing because these issues are complex. I recently received an email from the State of Kentucky directing me to the appropriate parties regarding some of my allegations. The IRS, not Blogonaut-Gianelli, will advise me - in the Opinion Letter I have requested - whether or not Traditional Holdings, LLC is a “long defunct business entity” or a sham company meant to deceive the IRS in order for Leonard Cohen to avoid paying ordinary income taxes.
Blogonaut-Gianelli, lying to the FBI is a crime and everyone has figured out that I am not spamming the Treasury. This really does provoke eye-rolling and, of course, comments about wasting taxpayer’s dollars. Agent Wynar, of course, should have been able to figure this out and he does indeed have my sympathies because you sound like you crawled out of a crypt. I can assure you, knowing Phil Spector, that he will want to know why you called Bruce Cutler about me, why you have lied to the FBI about me, why you have gone to such lengths to undermine my credibility and slander me, why you contacted Investigator Frayeh (an investigator on his matter) about me, why you were in touch with Cohen’s legal advisers and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who was (according to you) apparently willing to help me - all I had to do was lie (as usual - I have already turned down Cohen’s offer of 50% community property, etc.), and why you are all over his matter.
Kelley Lynch
P.S. Everything Walsh says is gratuitous and I am convinced that she is an unstable cult victim of Leonard Cohen’s and seeks his attention.
November 18th, 2009 at 12:19 pm
fromKelley Lynch to”*irs. commissioner” ,attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,”Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,ASKDOJ ,Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,Blogonaut Law-Blog ,STEPHEN GIANELLI ,Joff Belark ,doronweinberg ,Dennis ,Thaye Dorje ,”YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,Robert MacMillan ,”Lee K. Alpert” ,Teresa Low ,PIU ,MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,Governor.ritter@state.co.us,governor@governor.ca.gov,”attorney. general” ,stan.garnett@gmail.com,gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,becknerm ,”Hank, Larry” ,”John Hall, Chief of Police” ,”m.j. smith” ,moseszzz@mztv.com,Duane ,”Hoffman, Rand” ,lwieseltier@tnr.com,mayor@cityofhouston.net,Mick Brown
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Mick Brown - UK Telegraph
Hello Mick,
People seem to think you’re a liar. Cohen even shows up in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine. Anyway, “Kelly Green” is obviously not a brain surgeon.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says: November 18th, 2009 at 3:14 am Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-211011
November 18th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Hello Colleen,
John Maunts and Rob Watts did not sound like complete idiots - as Blogonaut/Gianelli appears to be suggesting. I am awaiting an Opinion Letter from the State of Kentucky and the IRS. I suppose you can commit criminal tax fraud in the State of Kentucky if the company is now defunct. The company was administratively dissolved and, in a Special Meeting I called (properly notifying Cohen as an attorney advised me to do), it is dissolved. I also filed final returns with the IRS so nothing else could be done in my name. But that doesn’t address the illegal K1s issued - by LC Investments, LLC - in the State of Kentucky and other questions.
Perhaps the State of Kentucky would like to explain the comments - below. It seems to indicate that committing tax fraud, not filing state tax returns, defrauding the State of Kentucky, committing mail fraud, having no business purpose, issuing illegal K1s, etc. is just fine - in Kentucky. Anyway, this is a game for these individuals and Gianelli/Blogonaut has lied to the FBI, inserted himself into Cohen’s tax fraud and the Phil Spector matter, and seems highly unstable - to me.
All the best,
Kelley
Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-211019
November 18th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
As far as I have been able to ascertain, the Kentucky Department of Revenue does not issue advisory tax opinions. If it did, the requesting party would have to be directly involved in an actual, current (prospective) tax situation. If the opinion then issued, the persons directly involved in that tax situation could then rely on the opinion going forward. And if it did, the opinion would be requested through tax professionals from the Kentucky Department of Revenue (not the Secretary of State).
Even where advisory tax opinions can be requested, the agency is under no obligation to issue one.
No taxing authority issues advisory opinions about the alleged past tax fraud of others concerning long defunct business entities. That is not what they are for.
Advisory tax opinions, when issued, are for the purpose of providing guidance to a tax payer who is facing a specific tax situation, going forward. They are not binding on the issuing agency but may protect a party who relies on it from the later assessment of penalties. They are not issued years after a transaction so an obsessed blogger can post them with an “I told you so” comment or about a celebrity’s tax matters to facilitate dogging that celebrity on the internet.
Therefore, if Kelley Lynch is waiting for a “tax opinion” from the State of Kentucky or the IRS regarding one or more Cohen related entities that no longer exist; it is going to be a longer wait than when she was waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler. Because it is NEVER going to happen.
And no KL, this does not mean that people can commit tax fraud. It just means that YOU cannot obtain tax opinions from the IRS or the Kentucky Department of Revenue regarding your allegations of past tax fraud.
That is all.
November 18th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Setting the record straight:
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Doron Weinberg, Esquire and Dennis Riordan, Esquire
Good Morning Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Blogonaut/Gianelli cannot control himself/itself. This is a game for him and he thinks lying to the FBI, contacting Bruce Cutler and Investigator Frayeh, and slandering me is not problematic. He is wrong. These are very sick, sadistic, twisted and unstable people who have targeted my children.
Love,
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 11:59 am
If I’ve become so boring why are you following me around the internet and defending someone like Leonard Cohen?
I have made no threat to have Cohen prosecuted by the IRS. I do not work for the IRS and I do not command the IRS around - nor do I speak for the IRS, DOJ, Treasury or the FBI. I also don’t draw conclusions, without facts, about what they are doing, aren’t doing, or what they consider a pending matter or criminal conduct. I reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud to the IRS. I contacted the FBI because activity was crossing state borders and, from what I have witnessed, it is official misconduct involving government, law enforcement, and - of course, Leonard Cohen and others. I contacted the DOJ when I realized law enforcement was playing games with me. That’s a direct quote - from law enforcement. Agent Kelly Sopko/Treasury Department contacted me and we met. I contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS in Los Angeles and reported Cohen’s tax fraud to him. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff - and others - with a tremendous amount of evidence relating to Cohen’s tax fraud, social security numbers, off-shore accounts, 1977 tax memo advising him that he didn’t have to pay taxes anywhere - but cautioning him not to have a green card, his abandoned green card, his various social security numbers, and - of course - his disdain for ordinary income taxes and these sham corporations. The IRS advised me that Cohen issued illegal K1s to me from LC Investments, LLC.
I am not waiting for Bruce Cutler and I think your call to Bruce Cutler was a desperate attempt to determine whether or not Bruce Cutler is still involved with Phil Spector. I am not waiting to hear from Phil Spector’s legal team. I am copying Phil Spector’s legal team in on my emails - together with quite a number of government agencies and others.
I actually have spoken with numerous people in the State of Kentucky - including Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet and Mr. Rob Watts - Fraud/State of Kentucky who asked me to put my complaint in writing because these issues are complex. I recently received an email from the State of Kentucky directing me to the appropriate parties regarding some of my allegations. The IRS, not Blogonaut-Gianelli, will advise me - in the Opinion Letter I have requested - whether or not Traditional Holdings, LLC is a “long defunct business entity” or a sham company meant to deceive the IRS in order for Leonard Cohen to avoid paying ordinary income taxes.
Blogonaut-Gianelli, lying to the FBI is a crime and everyone has figured out that I am not spamming the Treasury. This really does provoke eye-rolling and, of course, comments about wasting taxpayer’s dollars. Agent Wynar, of course, should have been able to figure this out and he does indeed have my sympathies because you sound like you crawled out of a crypt. I can assure you, knowing Phil Spector, that he will want to know why you called Bruce Cutler about me, why you have lied to the FBI about me, why you have gone to such lengths to undermine my credibility and slander me, why you contacted Investigator Frayeh (an investigator on his matter) about me, why you were in touch with Cohen’s legal advisers and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who was (according to you) apparently willing to help me - all I had to do was lie (as usual - I have already turned down Cohen’s offer of 50% community property, etc.), and why you are all over his matter.
Kelley Lynch
P.S. Everything Walsh says is gratuitous and I am convinced that she is an unstable cult victim of Leonard Cohen’s and seeks his attention.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 11:44 am
Well said Kelly G. and Susanne W.
After 5 years of KL threatening to sue anyone who dares disagree with her, she has become quite boring.
I have no doubt that 5 years from now KL with still be ranting about being in the verge of suing Leonard Cohen and others just has she asserted in 2005 when Cohen first obtained his $7,000,000.00 judgment against her.
It is almost 2010–the 5 year anniversary of KL’s empty threat to sue Cohen and have him prosecuted by the IRS and others.
According to KL there is always something that needs to happen before KL actually files suit. For almost two years she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler”. Then she was waiting to hear from Spector’s legal team. Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)
Don’t go away mad KL, just go away.
Kelly Green Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:14 am
Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?
Now you’ve decided Blogonaut/Gianelli is attacking you on this blog. Let’s be real, Gianelli’s brave enough to use his actual name—he doesn’t have to hide behind a fictional identity. And you’ve sent how many emails to the IRS, FBI, etc, claiming he’s being “mean” to you. Once again, you have no proof it’s Gianelli. Nonetheless, you want the IRS, FBI, etc, investigating Gianelli because “another victim” said something you didn’t like; therefore, it must be Gianelli’s fault.
You continue to attack Lorca Cohen, yet your children remain off-limits. You also make reference to a draft article by Anne Diamond–please provide a citation for Diamond’s published article. You often refer readers to various incantations of your blogs where the reader can peruse Diamond’s article. The problem is that you’re the one who posts the article and the only person who can edit the article is you. One citation to Diamond’s published article, on a website other than yours or a web entry other than one of your many nics, will suffice.
You also make reference to attornies telling you Cohen exposed you to criminal tax fraud. Are you under investigation or criminal indictment by the IRS, FBI, DOJ, homeland security…? Do you intend to “flip” on Cohen for a lighter sentence? Or do you intend to plead guilty and accept the fines and serve a prison sentence? In other words, if Cohen doesn’t go to prison then, the odds are, neither will you. I’m sure somewhere in your mind you’ll twist this into a bribe; afterall, Kelley, everything’s a bribe to you.
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 9:23 am
As far as I can see the only “truth” spoken by Kelley Lynch is that “I can’t help myself”. I just have a few more things to say in this debate, although Kelly Green really said it all very clear and precise.
It seems Ms. Lynch is getting more and more irrational, abusive and desperate, probably because nobody gives her any attention anymore, blogs and forums obviously refuse to print her lies and slander and therefore nobody respond to her outrageous outbursts, which again means her life is now completely emty.
Kelley Lynch accuses Leonard Cohen of being a pervert for writing erotic lyrics, That is not perverted, but writing on public internet sites mean and cruel gossip about a young woman (just because she hates her Father), keep on bringing up alleged “accusations” of she herself having sex with different famous men (i.e. Steven Segal and Oliver Stone), and her sexual fantasies about high profile lawers, that Ms. Lynch is perverted and sick, and NO I am NOT speaking for any of these men, but I would imagine that all of them (including Cohen) would prefer a “Hiroshima” to have any kind of relationship with Ms. Lynch.
Kelley Lynch is “Threatening” to sue hundreds of people from Leonard Cohen, several investigators down to ordinary bloggers who disagree with her lies, her reason for that is that “we” are trying to obstruct justice and make her look “not credible”. Here are a few different reasons to why Kelley Lynch does not appear credible:
Leonard Cohen commited tax fraud “That I was told is criminal”
“(Some) Investigators are criminal assholes”
Cohen has “probably” commited perjury in Phil Spector trial
Cohen has “Probably” molested his child
Male bloggers who objects to her lies are “possible” gay
Female bloggers are “obsessive cult fans”
It is Cohens fault that she lives in a homeless shelter and that her son lost his finger.
“Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is “probably” identical with Gianelli/Blogonaut.
All these and many more speculative “enemies” are being slandered and abused by Ms. Lynch.
Ms. Lynch has previously stated that “if she was Leonard Cohen’s legal advisor, she would ask me to stop defending him, since I am not helping him”. Well, Leonard Cohen does not need my defense or help to show the world how he is as a person, a writer, a performer, a Father, a friend and an employer. His loyal family, friends, band members, critics and fans speaks clearly of that. However, if I was Phil Spector’s advisor I would clearly advise Ms. Lynch to stop “defending” him and claiming to be his “dear friend”, if we are to believe the old saying “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”, and if Phil Spector’s credibility is equal to Ms. Lynch’s it just does not look good for poor old Phil.
Susanne Walsh\
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Here are my comments re. Susanne Walsh’s latest round of insane rants, for the record.
Love,
Kelley
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 9:23 am
As far as I can see the only “truth” spoken by Kelley Lynch is that “I can’t help myself”. I just have a few more things to say in this debate, although Kelly Green really said it all very clear and precise.
It seems Ms. Lynch is getting more and more irrational, abusive and desperate, probably because nobody gives her any attention anymore, blogs and forums obviously refuse to print her lies and slander and therefore nobody respond to her outrageous outbursts, which again means her life is now completely emty.
Clearly Walsh - Cohen’s obvious cult victim and #1 fan - is becoming frustrated because their attempts to silence me are not working. Of course, this woman does not know me, has not reviewed the evidence, has not witnessed what I’ve witnessed, and did not know Cohen for the entire 20 years I worked with him. She probably hopes this is a way to ingratiate herself with him - which is truly pathetic.
Kelley Lynch accuses Leonard Cohen of being a pervert for writing erotic lyrics,
It’s interesting to note, at this point, that a young woman who Cohen hired from Kelly Services felt she was being asked to read “porn” when we were working on Stranger Music (the book). Phillip told me he couldn’t stand Cohen’s porn lyrics. Paul Burger pointed out that Cohen’s psalms were cold.
That is not perverted, but writing on public internet sites mean and cruel gossip about a young woman (just because she hates her Father),
I have no idea if Lorca Cohen hates her father and I have never made that allegation. Walsh seemed to indicate that she addressed this issue with Lorca Cohen. The appropriate party to address Lorca Cohen’s allegations with is Freda Guttman.
keep on bringing up alleged “accusations” of she herself having sex with different famous men (i.e. Steven Segal and Oliver Stone),
I have never been accused, from what I can tell, of having sex with Steven Segal. I was accused - by Cohen (went he went into my young son’s father’s office with Kory) of having sex with Oliver Stone. Oliver Stone personally should address that allegation and may wonder why he has been dragged into this insanity.
and her sexual fantasies about high profile lawers, that Ms. Lynch is perverted and sick, and NO I am NOT speaking for any of these men, but I would imagine that all of them (including Cohen) would prefer a “Hiroshima” to have any kind of relationship with Ms. Lynch.
Cohen’s the one that has lied to the news media by telling them that we were lovers so clearly he likes that idea - although it’s a lie.
Kelley Lynch is “Threatening” to sue hundreds of people from Leonard Cohen, several investigators down to ordinary bloggers who disagree with her lies, her reason for that is that “we” are trying to obstruct justice and make her look “not credible”.
I have no intention of suing ordinary bloggers. That’s preposterous.
Here are a few different reasons to why Kelley Lynch does not appear credible:
Leonard Cohen commited tax fraud “That I was told is criminal”
Only the IRS and State of Kentucky know if the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud are credible - Walsh clearly does not.
“(Some) Investigators are criminal assholes”
I have no doubt that this is true. Perhaps Phil Spector would like to weigh in on this issue.
Cohen has “probably” commited perjury in Phil Spector trial
The detectives Steve Cron and I met at Cohen’s house should be called to the witness stand to “discuss” the fact that Cohen told them his comments to the news media, over the years, about Phil Spector were good rock ‘n roll comments. Cohen definitely appears in the prosecutor’s Motion in Limine. I have no idea why Mick Brown would lie and tell me that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury but I know this - I worked with Cohen for approximately 20 years and he never once told me that Phillip held a gun on him. He definitely told me that he hated his vocals. I know how seriously he takes his vocals - particularly if someone “drowns” them in the production.
Cohen has “Probably” molested his child
See Freda Guttman.
Male bloggers who objects to her lies are “possible” gay
Gratuitous and stupid.
Female bloggers are “obsessive cult fans”
I was referring to Walsh personally. She appears to be an obsessive cult “victim” attempting to impress Cohen. Who knows, however, she may just be deranged.
It is Cohens fault that she lives in a homeless shelter and that her son lost his finger.
Rutger and I agree on this one. Lindsey has liability as well.
“Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is “probably” identical with Gianelli/Blogonaut.
That can be determined via a subpoena. I thought Gianelli/Blogonaut was being brave and publicly posting about me. It’s now hiding behind a screen name?
All these and many more speculative “enemies” are being slandered and abused by Ms. Lynch.
Ms. Lynch has previously stated that “if she was Leonard Cohen’s legal advisor, she would ask me to stop defending him, since I am not helping him”.
True understatement. I also would have advised him to go into the IRS with me - if he really was defrauded by his advisers.
Well, Leonard Cohen does not need my defense or help to show the world how he is as a person, a writer, a performer, a Father, a friend and an employer. His loyal family, friends, band members, critics and fans speaks clearly of that.
Especially his family members, girlfriend, and friends who are on his payroll.
However, if I was Phil Spector’s advisor I would clearly advise Ms. Lynch to stop “defending” him and claiming to be his “dear friend”, if we are to believe the old saying “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”, and if Phil Spector’s credibility is equal to Ms. Lynch’s it just does not look good for poor old Phil.
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan, heed Walsh’s advice at your own risk. She now feels sorry for “poor old Phil” apparently. The woman is clearly nuts.
Susanne Walsh
For the record.
November 18th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
susanne walsh
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Hello Rinpoche,
Since you’re Steven Segal’s teacher and my friend I think you are well aware that I never had sex with Steven either. My sex life is truly fascinating for these maniacs - fictional but fascinating. Who knows - maybe Steven himself would like to address this particular issue.
Thank you, Rinpoche.
Love,
Kelley
November 18th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
KL loves to post her emails to others and to drop the names of celebrities (Phil Spector, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone) but she has never posted a reply from ANY of these persons to a single email by her–including to her many emails to “Rinpoche”, who she describes as “Steven Segal’s friend and teacher”.
Are these letter from KL to others, famous and otherwise (that are never replied to), supposed to persuade the world that all of these people support her?
Because we all know different.
If KL’s blog posts are any guide, the closest KL has come to an actual reply from anyone except Maurice the homeless guy from Santa Monica is the auto reply she received following her (unanswered) email to Anderson Cooper–which computer generated auto reply KL posted on her blog like it was confirmation of something.
Of course, KL is free to prove all of us wrong by posting a recent reply from Phil Spector, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone, or even “Rinpoche”. But don’t hold your breath.
As with the opinion letters KL is awaiting from the IRS and the Kentucky Secretary of State it ain’t goanna happen.
November 18th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
PS: Neither Doron Weinberg nor Dennis Riordan have ever replied to one of her hundreds of emails either. Yet she casually cc’s them like they were the best of friends (”all the best, Kelley”) when in fact none of these people give her the time of day.
November 18th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
There will be no further discussion about my fictional sex life. Oliver Stone and Steven Segal can take the witness stand and address these allegations personally. I did not drag these men into this situation, although Steven Segal has been quite helpful, but one can safely assume that someone like Oliver Stone might want to know why Leonard Cohen went into my young son’s father’s office and told him that we had sex.
Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche is Steven Segal’s teacher. Steven Segal is well aware of this. We were also students of His Holiness Penor Rinpoche who I frequently visited at Steven’s house. I have no idea what point “Another Victim” is making here - but he has made this point to me: it is Gianelli/Blogonaut because I just wrote Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche about this and here it is posting lies and insanity again.
I see - Blogonaut/Gianelli now speaks for Oliver Stone and Steven Segal. I do not and that’s why I want them personally to address these allegations.
I’ll send Blogonaut/Gianelli the latest email I received from Colleen Chaney/State of Kentucky. I happen to love Maurice and have no idea why his homeless status is such an issue for this individual. He also seems quite fixated on Anderson Cooper.
I suppose Blogonaut thinks that my teachers are not copied in on my emails really, aren’t paying attention, and are uninterested in what’s happening to me. That’s a very foolish position to take.
Blogonaut/Gianelli/Kelley Lynch’s Victim continues to speak for the IRS and now the State of Kentucky - proving to me that they do not care about criminal tax fraud. That’s fine. My legal position has nothing to do with theirs. Mine is the mere fact that I had the audacity to report Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, to the IRS and he, Lindsey, and others, decided to destroy my life. The IRS, DOJ, Treasury, FBI, and others should definitely investigate who dragged me to Killer King and falsified the file. Other people understand this all too well. They also understand that the people targeting me on the internet are nuts and insane.
Kelley Lynch
November 18th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan should also speak for themselves. I know one of them may have waved to Blogonaut/Gianelli but I remain unconvinced that “it” speaks for them.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
PS: Neither Doron Weinberg nor Dennis Riordan have ever replied to one of her hundreds of emails either. Yet she casually cc’s them like they were the best of friends (”all the best, Kelley”) when in fact none of these people give her the time of day.
November 18th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
susanne walsh
anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Why is Blogonaut-Gianelli-and my so-called victim stating - on behalf of the IRS - that I will not receive the Opinion Letter I have requested? How does it know what I will or will not receive from the IRS?
And now “it” seems to know Oliver Stone and Steven Segal and may actually be speaking for my teachers some of whom are also Steven’s teachers.
Steven Segal was quite helpful, to me, with one particular situation that arose with respect to this ordeal and it absolutely concerns the IRS. In fact, I discussed this with the Treasury Agents and it is and always will be psychotic. Steven knows this - he even phoned his attorney.
All the best,
Kelley
- Hide quoted text -
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello,
I assume my so-called “victim” speaks for the State of Kentucky now. Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche is indeed Steven Segal’s teacher and friend - as was His Holiness Penor Rinpoche. I can assure you that I would not post a “reply” from my teachers, Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Phil Spector or his legal team on a public blog in order to refute Blahgonut’s insanity. It knows different. It apparently now knows Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, and Phil Spector.
For some reason this fool seems obsessed with Anderson Cooper.
Well, it has insider information - apparently - from the IRS and State of Kentucky that I won’t be receiving Opinion Letters. It looks like someone authorized him to publicly state that it “ain’t gonna happen.” If I have to subopena these Opinion Letters I am “gonna” have them.
I think it’s safe to say that Doron Weinberg has replied to my emails. We’ll leave it at that.
Not sure where we’re going here but let’s watch what unfolds with the man I think may have crawled out of a crypt - literally.
All the best,
Kelley
November 18th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Considering all the vulgar and defamatory nametags Kelley Lynch put on her “enimies”, I guess I should be gratefull that all I am is an “unstable cult fan”. I guess I can live with that.
I wrote that Kelley Lynch writes vicious gossip about Lorca Cohen because she (Kelley Lynch, not Lorca,) hates Cohen.
Only one person has EVER mentioned relationships between Kelley Lynch and Oliver Stone and Steven Segal, and that is KELLEY LYNCH, why would anybody else care.
I have no idea who “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is, but my infamous intuitions tells me that it is NOT Gianelli/Blogonaut. As Kelly Green stated, he was never afraid of stating his real name, and although Kelley Lynch absolutely abused him and his forum, I am sure he never perceived himself as a “victim”.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
susanne walsh
ccdbergman@bergman-law.com
dateWed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Let me set the record straight regarding Walsh’s further lies.
All the best,
Kelley
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Considering all the vulgar and defamatory nametags Kelley Lynch put on her “enimies”, I guess I should be gratefull that all I am is an “unstable cult fan”. I guess I can live with that.
There is nothing vulgar and/or defamatory about what I’ve written although this story is ugly and malicious.
I wrote that Kelley Lynch writes vicious gossip about Lorca Cohen because she (Kelley Lynch, not Lorca,) hates Cohen.
I could care less about Leonard Cohen. He became increasingly greedy; badmouthed many people (such as Leanne Ungar and Sharon Robinson, etc.); seemed sneaky with respect to his finances; and the situation with his corporations and disdain for ordinary income taxes was unbelievable. I understand why he did not go to the IRS with me.
Only one person has EVER mentioned relationships between Kelley Lynch and Oliver Stone and Steven Segal, and that is KELLEY LYNCH, why would anybody else care.
This is a lie. Steven Clark Lindsey told me and emailed me that Cohen and his lawyer (who he described as vicious) came into his office and told him that I had sex with Oliver Stone and Richard Rutowski, a very dear friend of mine who was one of the producers of “Natural Born Killers” and who is a devoted student of His Holiness Thinley Norbu’s Father. Richard was also Oliver Stone’s best friend. Walsh cannot possibly know any of this but she is merely lying and, I believe, highly unstable. If no one cares why do they keep writing about them? In any event, I believe Oliver Stone and Steven Segal are both aware that they will be taking the witness stand in this matter.
I have no idea who “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is, but my infamous intuitions tells me that it is NOT Gianelli/Blogonaut. As Kelly Green stated, he was never afraid of stating his real name, and although Kelley Lynch absolutely abused him and his forum, I am sure he never perceived himself as a “victim”.
Susanne Walsh
Fine, it’s not Gianelli/Blogonaut. I can’t imagine who it is but intend to subpoena that information so it can hide for now.
November 18th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Whatever happend between Ms. Lynch, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone and who-ever in her private life is her bussiness, and NO, I do not know what happend, but I know the only one who has ever written about these people on the internet is Kelley Lynch, she likes people to believe that she was involved with all these famous people, and maybe she was, but that time is over and nobody cares how important they are or what they produced.
Ms. Lynch wrote me (yet another private mail) that she is leaving Texas, because she fears for her safety from the “Maniacs” who are targeting her. Well I hope she will find a safe place and stop writing garbage on the web, then she will be safe. Maybe finding a job to support herself and keep her busy instead of spending her life harassing blog-readers, would be a good idea.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
Walsh, let’s be clear. When Leonard Cohen goes into my son’s father’s office and accuses me of having sex with Oliver Stone and others - in an attempt to apparently dissuade me from going to the IRS and stirring up Steven Clark Lindsey it’s relevant. You do not know what happened - and that includes with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I don’t care what people believe about who I was involved with. Are you speaking, again, on behalf of people you do not know?
I didn’t write you a private email. I wrote you so that later no one has any deniability about their lies and slander because I have set the record straight point by point - ad nauseum. I am not leaving Texas because I fear for my safety. I said, and let me quote, the Director of the Star of Hope asked me if I was concerned about my safety. He said nothing about “maniacs” targeting me.
What is your point - I am not safe until I am silenced? It is not going to happen.
Kelley Lynch
November 18th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
susanne walsh
ccdbergman@bergman-law.com
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM
To the DOJ and FBI,
It’s clear: if I’m silent, I’m safe.
All the best,
Kelley
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
I hardly think these emails are “private.” After all, the IRS is not my penpal. The DOJ of not my penpal. And neither is the Treasury and/or the FBI. Do you see where I wrote Walsh that I am leaving Texas because I fear for my safety from the maniacs who are targeting me? It’s clear - if they can silence me, however, I’m “safe.” Very sinister way of viewing things actually.
All the best,
Kelley
“Ms. Lynch wrote me (yet another private mail) that she is leaving Texas, because she fears for her safety from the “Maniacs” who are targeting her. Well I hope she will find a safe place and stop writing garbage on the web, then she will be safe.” - Susanne Walsh
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
Walsh, let’s be clear. When Leonard Cohen goes into my son’s father’s office and accuses me of having sex with Oliver Stone and others - in an attempt to apparently dissuade me from going to the IRS and stirring up Steven Clark Lindsey it’s relevant. You do not know what happened - and that includes with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I don’t care what people believe about who I was involved with. Are you speaking, again, on behalf of people you do not know?
I didn’t write you a private email. I wrote you so that later no one has any deniability about their lies and slander because I have set the record straight point by point - ad nauseum. I am not leaving Texas because I fear for my safety. I said, and let me quote, the Director of the Star of Hope asked me if I was concerned about my safety. He said nothing about “maniacs” targeting me.
What is your point - I am not safe until I am silenced? It is not going to happen.
Kelley Lynch
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Whatever happend between Ms. Lynch, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone and who-ever in her private life is her bussiness, and NO, I do not know what happend, but I know the only one who has ever written about these people on the internet is Kelley Lynch, she likes people to believe that she was involved with all these famous people, and maybe she was, but that time is over and nobody cares how important they are or what they produced.
Ms. Lynch wrote me (yet another private mail) that she is leaving Texas, because she fears for her safety from the “Maniacs” who are targeting her. Well I hope she will find a safe place and stop writing garbage on the web, then she will be safe. Maybe finding a job to support herself and keep her busy instead of spending her life harassing blog-readers, would be a good idea.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
For the record, the only famous person who has public lied and accused me of being his lover is Leonard Norman Cohen.
November 18th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Kelley, anyone who has read your various twisted blogs knows that you will post anything resembling a reply from anyone, yet you have never posted any communications from Steven Segal, “Rinpoche”, Phil Spector, Oliver Stone, or any of your other “friends”. Nor has anyone on your spam email list ever replied to you except to ask that they be dropped from the list.
This is quite a fantasy life you have concocted for yourself, but you have long ago burned any bridges you had in Los Angeles, you have now fled from Boulder, and you now live in a homeless shelter–despite a mother and sister in the area.
And you have been threatening to obtain subpoenas and then to sue every anonymous blog commenter who has dared challenge your posted nonsense for years—but never have and never will. Indeed, you have not even brought action against the persons whose identities you already know (e.g., Cohen).
Who do you think you are fooling?
This really has moved from the bizarre to the pathetic.
November 18th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
Yes, and the only person who in public has mentioned famous people being involved with Kelley Lynch, is Kelley Lynch.
In the past hour I have received 6 private E-mails from Kelley Lynch, mostly copies of mails send to IRS, and other public offices and “sweet” letters to her various “Holy Men” asking them to pray for her safety from the “Maniacs”. I hope
The “Holy Men” will pray that Ms. Lynch will stop writing all her private grievances and hate on the internet, that will stop everybody from “targeting” her and her children, that does not mean that anybody wants to “silence” her, just don’t air all your dirty laundry on the web.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Walsh, see if you can follow this logic - you’ve been copied in on my emails to the IRS and others (documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud I was told is criminal) because you’re lying about me and I am correcting the lies, slander, misinformation, etc.
Good. We’re clear - Cohen the perverted fraud lied and said we were lovers.
Gratuitous remarks, of course, about great Tibetan lamas. Cohen, himself, was Joshu Sasaki’s emissary to the 16th Gyalwa Karmapa. The 17th Karmapa is copied in on the emails and, no doubt, understands corrupt governments and corrupt law enforcement.
I see - are my children still open to being targeted. If I’m not silenced my children are targeted? Fascinating. That’s precisely what I concluded.
Your are now removed from my emails - to the IRS (and others - DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Phil Spector’s legal team, etc.)
Kelley Lynch
November 18th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Ms. Lynch I do follow your logic, I am not lying about you, you know it and everybody else knows it, you destroyed your life and nobody else.
Nobody is targeting you and your children, you are the one writing all details of your own and your childrens most private lives on the internet, you are an ABUSIVE MOTHER, and your children should not live with you. Keep your private stuff private, hire a lawyer and sue whomever you want, but don’t expect sympathy with all this garbage.
Really what have you gained in the two years of exposing your and your childrens private lives to “The World”?? Not one blogger or reader has sympathized with you or agreed with you in anything you have said, you have just made yourself look more and more unstable and wacky and lost all credibility.
So what if Cohen said “you were lovers” 20 years ago, maybe he meant it as a compliment, but get over it.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
PS. Thank you for removing me from your E-mail list
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Ms. Walsh, you were merely being copied in because I intend to prove that you - and others - are liars. It’s very very simple. You, on the other hand, have proven (to my satisfaction) that I (and my children) have been targeted and will continue to be targeted until I am silenced. That will be when hell freezes over. In the meantime, continue on with your attempts to impress the man who thinks he was my lover and who I know is a pathelogical liar, calculated fraud, and definitely a jealous pervert.
Kelley Lynch
November 18th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
Kelley Lynch has been threatening to sue us since we were required to ban her from commenting on our site after we returned from a hiatus on Crete in May of 2009 to learn that Lynch had hijacked several comments sections following several Phil Spector retrial related posts, and posted scores of defamatory items that we subsequently deleted.
This was well before we ever mentioned the name “Kelley Lynch” in print.
Things went downhill from there. Our attorney wrote to Ms. Lynch, and then she started spamming our attorney.
But since Ms. Lynch was threatening to retain Bruce Cutler to take legal action against us, our attorney contacted Mr. Cutler who called him back immediately to advise that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him a dozen unwanted and unsolicited voice messages for two years and that he regarded her as a telephone stalker—thus ending Lynch’s “I am waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler” gambit.
More recently, we reached out to a Phil Spector security consultant (Bill Pavelic) that Lynch was also touting as a “friend” in hundreds of posted (on her blog) emails cc’d to this high profile person, and he replied that he has noting to do with Ms. Lynch, who is obviously a “very disturbed woman”.
Our attorney also had an extended telephone conversation with a Treasury Agent who is also prominently listed as a cc recipient on the hundreds of rant emails posted on Lynch’s blog (and also the email posted above) who assured our attorney that we had noting to fear from the IRS as a result of any Lynch related accusations because Lynch is not credible.
In 2005, after Cohen obtained a civil harassment restraining order against Lynch and was preparing to take enforcement action against Lynch, she fled to Boulder Colorado, where (according to her) she was frequently arrested.
Cohen obtained a civil harassment restraining order against Lynch in Boulder, Colorado, in 2008, and repeating her earlier pattern, Lynch initially fled to New Jersey to avoid repercussions, then returned to Colorado, then fled to Houston Texas (after calling police to report the young couple who had taken her into their home for alleged drug abuse).
Kelley Lynch is currently living in a homeless shelter in Houston Texas not far her mother’s residence and the residence of her sister and brother-in-law.
She blogs her hate filled emails and blog posts from a certain branch of the Huston Public Library.
Lynch, for all of her hate filled posts about this blog, is on our blog almost every day blogging from that Huston Public Library branch (which we have not named) that has an IP address of 66.60.241.7.
Lynch was on our site reading various posts today, November 17, 2009, in fact, reading two different Blogonaut posts covering the Phil Spector appeal.
Lynch has been publicly defaming this blog and our attorney for many months, and the only reason that we have not sued Lynch for libel is that she is impecunious and leads a transient lifestyle.
–Blogonaut Law Blog
November 18th, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Yes OK Ms. Lynch.. I received your E-mails on my private E-mail address which means it is private mails.
You Ms. Lynch and ONLY you are targeting your children, no normal people would want to cause pain to their own or to other peoples children, but you Ms. Lynch obviously have no problems with that.
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Actually you are lying about me. Since you don’t know me, didn’t know Cohen in the 20 years I worked with him (as a personal manager), and have not reviewed the evidence I’ve sent to the IRS and others, one has to assume that you are merely a cult victim attempting to ingratiate yourself with Leonard Cohen.
People have targeted me and my children. I’ll give you one example: Leonard Cohen’s very own lawyer (for lack of a better word and/or description), Robert Kory, filed a Declaration in my son’s custody matter. That is an attempt to obstruct justice, coerce me into an illegal deal, and - of course - it is witness tampering. Why is it witness tampering, Ms. Walsh? Let me lead you through this very very simply - because my son “witnessed” a conversation between me and Kory about criminal tax fraud (Cohen’s); the missing tax returns (State of Kentucky and probably elsewhere); my intellectual property that Cohen stole (from Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. - I have the corporate books, records, stock certificates, and Cohen’s notarized signature to prove this); and their lame threats.
You are lying again. I am not an abusive Mother and my chlidren know this. In fact, my older son is really eager for me to begin my legal proceedings and wants to join me in those. You do, however, seem to be a bit hysterical now. My children should decide who they want to live with - not you, a mere stranger and Cohen’s #1 fan.
I can assure you that I’m not looking for sympathy on the internet. I am, however, documenting all the slander, lies, defamation, etc.
Well, given the fact that everyone I have spoken with believes Phil Spector was framed and Cohen has committed criminal tax fraud and should be prosecuted, one can assume that the blog readers are mindless idiots. Either that - or just stupid.
Cohen didn’t say we were lovers 20 years ago. In fact, he pin-pointed to the precise time when I happened to work for Phil Spector. That would be the same time that a witness in Phillip’s matter (Diane Ogden), who has since died of a drug overdose (another matter the DEA should look into probably), said she did. This allegation also proves that Leonard Cohen is, as I’ve stated, a pathelogical liar. You seem to come up with endless excuses. If you want to be Cohen’s lover - be my guest. That thought makes me want to “Puke.”
Let’s revisit Eminem’s song “Puke.” Somehow, Eminem personally summed up my exact feelings about Leonard Cohen although he dedicated the live MTV version (with the references to “dry humping” to Mariah Carey. I also dedicated to Spector prosecutor Pat Dixon who I wouldn’t have sex with if my life depended on it or if he were the last man on the planet. Blogonaut/Gianelli might though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AmCIryu6Q&feature=related
Kelley Lynch
November 18th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Ms. Lynch, all your dwelling on sex, seems to indicate that You , not I, are the frustrated one. Try to find a cute guy, maybe that will relax you a bit
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
Gratuitous, lame, boring …
November 18th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
OK Ms. Lynch, sorry I bored you, anyway it is late night in Denmark now, so sweet dreams to you (or whatever you want to do with the rest of your day)
By the way I have now received 14 E-mails from you, I guess you forgot to take me off your list??
Susanne Walsh
November 18th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Since Ms. Lynch is fond of publishing her hundreds of monthly emails to her various spam victims on various internet sites, here is our response to Kelley Lynch’s 12th email of today:
November 18, 2009
Dear Ms. Lynch:
We do not understand why you are copying this blog with personal correspondence that you have sent to your son, sister, and brother-in-law–or at all–since you represented to us on September 3, 2009 that you would be dropping us from your email list—per your agreement with an investigator with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.
Your emails (a dozen today) are unwanted spam. Clearly you are a very disturbed woman.
This blog was required to ban you from commenting as a result of your habit of posting slanderous material about various persons.
As you have recently advised us, you have been reduced to living in a homeless shelter despite living near your mother, sister and brother-in-law–who obviously are as tired of your daily drama as are we–to the point that they have (apparently) washed their hands of you.
We are sorry that you have decided not to seek psychiatric help but at this point it’s not our problem.
It was very cleaver of the City of Houston to provide you with a bus ticket our of their jurisdiction.
If only we could do the same.
What a shame that you have not sought help and that as a result instead of spending the Holliday’s with family, you are moving on, alone, once again to another state.
Please do not contact this blog, our attorney, or anyone else affiliated with us again. We are quite confident that your mother, son and sister are not thrilled about your copying your emails to them to us and the rest of your spam email list (including the IRS, Justice Department, etc. etc.) either.
–Blogonaut Law Blog
November 18th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
KELLY - GIVE IT A REST ALREADY. YOU ARE GETTING NOWHERE AND YOU WILL GET NOWHERE IN THE FUTURE UNTIL YOU STOP ABUSING YOURSELF AND YOUR CHILDREN AND GET THE PROFESSIONAL PSYCHIATRIC HELP YOU SO DESPERATELY NEED. There now, that feels better. Kelly, I swore I would not respond to any of these continuing rants of yours against people you don’t even know, but it is impossible when I see you hijack every web site that mentions Leonard Cohen. The only person you rant and slander and libel that you know is LC. All these folks you cc don’t know you any more than they know the Easter Bunny - which bespeaks the childishness of your rants. Give the world a break, would you? No one has done anything to you that you have not brought on yourself. Surely someone at that shelter you live in can refer you to someone for psychiatric help.
November 19th, 2009 at 1:24 am
Oh for the love of God, is there no one on this planet who cares about or loves Kelley Lynch enough to get her professional help?
November 19th, 2009 at 5:49 am
Kelly Green, my thoughts exactly.
It may be possible that Kelley Lynch’s family is afraid that she will have a complete meltdown or even worse, turn her rage towards them, if they confront her with her emotional and mental state.
Kelley Lynch’s narcissism and sense of self-importance is so enormous, which is a clear indication of mental disturbance. She truely believes that public internet forums exists only for her, a place where she has the right to express all her hate and to lie, slander and threaten people she know as well as many she does not know, but anybody who gives her a response she does not like, should be reported to the IRS, The FBI and the DOJ.
Susanne Walsh
November 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
mpduke1@msn.com
ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
Kelley Lynch
Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:12 AM
To the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and the Treasury,
I would like to take this time to thank each of “you” for accomodating my little federal prank. It’s very sportsmanlike of you. I realize that the federal government is extremely busy and, therefore, I feel especially fortunate that I’ve been able to connect with truly “fun” agencies in a meaningful way.
All the best,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Good Morning Gentle Men,
Please see my comments - in red - below re. the latest bout of public lunacy.
Thank you.
Love,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello Bill,
Excuse me for contacting you again. I trust you’re well and I trust you know that I intend to nail this lunatic. Every word Gianelli, who spoke with you, has said (about me) is a lie. It certainly is keenly interested in me. Obsessed might be a better word. It’s communications with “Jackson” are, of course, of the utmost interest to me - and, no doubt, Phil Spector. If the FBI thinks it’s ok for Gianelli-Blogonaut to lie to them that’s just fine with me.
In any event, Bill, I think my sister and brother-in-law who are copied in here can speak for themselves and I can assure you that Gianelli-Blogonaut does not speak for them. It speaks for everyone else, however. That includes, but is not limited to, the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, FBI, Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Bruce Cutler.
Thanks for noting that you didn’t think I was involved with a federal prank. I didn’t think so either, Bill. I thought I was targeted by lunatics after reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into Phil Spector’s insanity. Since you know Brian Bennett you must know that someone (a woman) placed an anonymous tip about Phil Spector and my friendship to the District Attorney’s office. These incidents (the tax fraud/murder trial) have exposed me to truly unstable individuals. Shady hardly beings to describe it.
My Mother is elderly, concerned that my children could commit suicide if they read what is being written, and is concerned that these people will target her and my Father. So ask yourself this, Bill - should I sit by silently and let cyber-terrorists and thug liars target my family? Reporting tax fraud to the IRS is extremely dangerous. That’s why intelligent individuals are concerned about my safety.
Have a good day.
All the best,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
The man who has lied to you is having a blast, apparently, posting about me, monitoring my actions, and boasting that I am being investigated. Why don’t you write me and explain why I am being investigated and why reporting criminal tax fraud, documenting the destruction of my life, and correcting lies and slander is spam.
While I await your answer please see my comments re. Blogonaut’s post and others on Phawker.com. Sydney, who also posts, on Blogonaut’s site seems positively hysterical from my perspective. Why should I continue to be victimized by madmen and women who are aware that the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI are copied in and are writing about this fact. I absolutely believe I have been exposed to truly unstable people due to the fact that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and was dragged into Phil Spector’s murder trial that is clearly a set up. If every single person I speak with understand this and five of the greatest forensic scientists in America have concluded that Clarkson shot herself than the citizens of the United States should pray that the FBI figured it out also.
These people have now crossed the line. I am not an abusive Mother and I am sick of their lies about me and my family. If the FBI thinks it is acceptable that they have been lied to - by Gianelli-Blogonaut - that’s your business and that’s your problem.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Since Ms. Lynch is fond of publishing her hundreds of monthly emails to her various spam victims on various internet sites, here is our response to Kelley
Lynch’s 12th email of today:
November 18, 2009
Dear Ms. Lynch:
We do not understand why you are copying this blog with personal correspondence that you have sent to your son, sister, and brother-in-law–or at all–since you represented to us on September 3, 2009 that you would be dropping us from your email list—per your agreement with an investigator with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.
I don’t understand why the FBI thinks it’s acceptable that you have lied to them. I personally believe it’s a crime and know people have gone to prison for this. I also don’t understand why you contacted Investigator William Frayeh/Investigator in the Phil Spector matter, or were in touch with Cohen’s legal team and attempted to put me in touch with Cohen. If you don’t understand that I am documenting everything and correcting/addressing malicious lies and slander then you don’t understand english.
I had no such agreement with Investigator Frayeh of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office.
Your emails (a dozen today) are unwanted spam. Clearly you are a very disturbed woman.
My emails are not spam although the truth may be unwanted when people like you lie to the FBI and intentionally slander and malign me.
This blog was required to ban you from commenting as a result of your habit of posting slanderous material about various persons.
You banned me because your reporter Joff Belark wrote one long lie disguised as an article and I adamently set out to correct those lies.
As you have recently advised us, you have been reduced to living in a homeless shelter despite living near your mother, sister and brother-in-law–who obviously are as tired of your daily drama as are we–to the point that they have (apparently) washed their hands of you.
I don’t know if I believe you have properly characterized the fact that I “advised” you that I have been “reduced” to living in a homeless shelter. What’s your point? Do you know my Mother, sister, or brother-in-law and how can you speak for them? They have not washed their hands of me and you are nothing other than a pathetic liar.
We are sorry that you have decided not to seek psychiatric help but at this point it’s not our problem.
I don’t need psychiatric help but I think your actual problems are criminal in nature.
It was very cleaver of the City of Houston to provide you with a bus ticket our of their jurisdiction.
This is another lie as I have already explained to you. The City of Houston has not provided me with a bus ticket.
If only we could do the same.
What a shame that you have not sought help and that as a result instead of spending the Holliday’s with family, you are moving on, alone, once again to another state.
How would you know where I am spending the holidays?
Please do not contact this blog, our attorney, or anyone else affiliated with us again. We are quite confident that your mother, son and sister are not thrilled about your copying your emails to them to us and the rest of your spam email list (including the IRS, Justice Department, etc. etc.) either.
Why would you assume that I am spamming the IRS, DOJ, and others. They are well aware that I have reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and provided them with substantial evidence of this allegation - including my emails with Cohen, Westin, Greenberg, all the advisers, etc.
–Blogonaut Law Blog
Sydney, who does not know me, seems highly unstable and hysterical. Someone at the Shelter - the Director - thought my safety was of the utmost concern. My Mother thought that people like this are deranged and could target me.
Sydney Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
KELLY - GIVE IT A REST ALREADY. YOU ARE GETTING NOWHERE AND YOU WILL GET NOWHERE IN THE FUTURE UNTIL YOU STOP ABUSING YOURSELF AND YOUR CHILDREN AND GET THE PROFESSIONAL PSYCHIATRIC HELP YOU SO DESPERATELY NEED. There now, that feels better. Kelly, I swore I would not respond to any of these continuing rants of yours against people you don’t even know, but it is impossible when I see you hijack every web site that mentions Leonard Cohen. The only person you rant and slander and libel that you know is LC. All these folks you cc don’t know you any more than they know the Easter Bunny - which bespeaks the childishness of your rants. Give the world a break, would you? No one has done anything to you that you have not brought on yourself. Surely someone at that shelter you live in can refer you to someone for psychiatric help.
Stupid.
Kelly Green Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 1:24 am
Oh for the love of God, is there no one on this planet who cares about or loves Kelley Lynch enough to get her professional help?
My family, who all know Leonard Cohen, are probably aware that this is what some of his fans are like. They are actually concerned (afraid perhaps) that these fans will target them. At least Walsh is aware that the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury are copied in on my emails - documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s criminal tax fraud. Fortunately, the federal agencies I’ve copied in were all game and playing along with my little “prank.” Very accomodating of them.
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 5:49 am
Kelly Green, my thoughts exactly.
It may be possible that Kelley Lynch’s family is afraid that she will have a complete meltdown or even worse, turn her rage towards them, if they confront her with her emotional and mental state.
Kelley Lynch’s narcissism and sense of self-importance is so enormous, which is a clear indication of mental disturbance. She truely believes that public internet forums exists only for her, a place where she has the right to express all her hate and to lie, slander and threaten people she know as well as many she does not know, but anybody who gives her a response she does not like, should be reported to the IRS, The FBI and the DOJ.
Susanne Walsh
November 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
You are both right, of course Kelly and Susanne. It seems that Kelley has burned all her bridges behind her and there is no longer anyone who will take her under their wing to get her the help she so desperately needs. It is normal for a person suffering from mental illness to believe everyone is out to get her, that everyone is lying about her and that everyone is against her. It’s called denial and is very difficult to break through. I’ve tried in the past to reach out to Kelley via email, but I was left with a response right out of the DSM-IV (the diagnostic manual for psychiatric disorders), and finally told her I was done with her. Lucky for me she dropped me from her rant-list. She did seem to calm down for a short time, but now she is back armed to the teeth with paranoia, hatefulness and unbridled rage at the people she knows only on the net, and her nagging self-pity presented to all those poor government officials, attorney’s and of course Blogonaut. I cannot understand why she is not being forced into a psych unit for at least the 72 hour hold that a Chapter 52 committal would require. Well, I guess I will now go back on her list of enemies but that is something I have no control over. Kelley, despite the threats you hear in everyone’s comments, there are people who do care what happens to you and we truly hope you will get some help. At least go for an evaluation so you can prove us wrong, if in fact we are.
November 19th, 2009 at 1:16 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
mpduke1@msn.com
ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark
Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM
cc: Blogonaut, Gianelli, and Belark
For the record.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the Mayor of Houston,
Just trapping Blogonaut, and others, in their lies, slander, defamation, etc. For the record, the City of Houston is not supplying me with a bus ticket or any other type of ticket for transportation related to my next trip.
All the best,
Kelley
November 19th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
mpduke1@msn.com
ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
Kelley Lynch
Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Karen and David,
Please see Sydney’s note below. Now these are the types of lunatics I have been exposed to. Clearly I haven’t burned my bridges with you or my family. Lindsey destroyed Ray’s life and I think it’s safe to say that he’s garbage, a pathelogical liar, and abusive man. I don’t believe everyone is out to get me. I know for a fact that strangers are lying about me and slandering me on the internet. Why would Sydney, who is lying about me, try to reach out to me and why would I respond? I see Sydney’s not “done” with me yet. I never had Sydney on any rant list so apparently it has delusions of grandeur. All the poor government officials. That’s truly an amazing statement. I see attempting to force me into a psychiatric ward is being publicly discussed. This is a recurring theme in this matter - in fact, as you know, Lindsey even wanted me committed so he could have access to my photo albums. Quite a sick, twisted man but we know that. Sydney, who I don’t know, thinks it’s my enemy. This is really quite pathetic. Perhaps Sydney is an ego-maniac who thinks it is at the center of Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s set up.
Rutger knows where I need to go for help - to the criminal attorney I am keeping closely apprised of every single thing that’s unfold. Then again, Rutger’s brilliant and these nuts are mere lunatics and unstable individuals who have targeted me and appear obsessed with me.
Love,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Agent Sopko,
Please see my comments below. Sydney has posted on Blogonaut’s site and does not know me - at all. This has become a truly sick situation.
All the best,
Kelley
Sydney Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
You are both right, of course Kelly and Susanne. It seems that Kelley has burned all her bridges behind her and there is no longer anyone who will take her under their wing to get her the help she so desperately needs. It is normal for a person suffering from mental illness to believe everyone is out to get her, that everyone is lying about her and that everyone is against her. It’s called denial and is very difficult to break through. I’ve tried in the past to reach out to Kelley via email, but I was left with a response right out of the DSM-IV (the diagnostic manual for psychiatric disorders), and finally told her I was done with her. Lucky for me she dropped me from her rant-list. She did seem to calm down for a short time, but now she is back armed to the teeth with paranoia, hatefulness and unbridled rage at the people she knows only on the net, and her nagging self-pity presented to all those poor government officials, attorney’s and of course Blogonaut. I cannot understand why she is not being forced into a psych unit for at least the 72 hour hold that a Chapter 52 committal would require. Well, I guess I will now go back on her list of enemies but that is something I have no control over. Kelley, despite the threats you hear in everyone’s comments, there are people who do care what happens to you and we truly hope you will get some help. At least go for an evaluation so you can prove us wrong, if in fact we are.
November 19th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Duane ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Mick Brown ,
mpduke1@msn.com
ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
Kelley Lynch
Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM
P.S. I’m going to have a word with Rutger’s attorneys about this situation. It’s probably affected him.
November 19th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
I rest my case…
November 19th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Sydney, you have no case. You are lying about me. You sound like a lunatic and you have no idea what you are talking about. A friend of mine just wrote me with his insights into what is going on here. I think the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury should take him seriously. I have the full support of my parents, sister, her husband, and my older son. My younger son’s life has been destroyed. His father has a pattern of taking children away from their mothers. We know him. You do not. He, not I, had the vicodin, ambien, etc. addiction. Your interest in me is truly sick. I am a stranger. My attorney will rest my case. His/her name will be revealed when he/she advises me to do so. In the meantime, underestimate me and assume I’m bluffing. I will, on the other hand, document the slander, malice, defamation, etc. - all of which I view as “witness tampering” particularly when it’s intentional: think Gianelli/Blogonaut.
Kelley Lynch
November 19th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
“Witness tampering” is a legal term of art that excludes blog comments.
One can only wonder if KL’s life is in order, and she has the “full support” of her family in Texas, who she is leaving Texas for another state on the eve of the Thanksgiving and christmas Hollidays.
As for the “crimianl attorney” that Lynch is keeping apprised of this matter in connection with her desire to sue Cohen,–for that KL will need a civil litigation attorney, and moreover an attorney with the ability to trun back time to before Lynch’s statute of limitations to sue Cohen expired.
November 19th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
ASKDOJ ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
dateThu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:14 PM
subjectKelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles, Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and others - professionally and individually
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 1:14 PM (1 hour ago)
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Alan Jackson is copied in on my emails. I do believe that Phillip will join me in a lawsuit against these maniacs. They ought to take a good hard look in the mirror so they can see what other people see: a bunch of corrupt government officials who framed Phil Spector. That’s how credible I am. Every single person I’ve spoken to believes this. It also happens to be true so it’s particularly unreal.
I want to know what Blogonaut-Gianelli’s connection is to the Los Angeles District Attorney, Alan Jackson personally, Leonard Cohen’s advisers, and - of course - the Clarkson family. All of these parties - and Cohen, Lindsey, their advisers, et al. - have “motive.”
Love,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the FBI,
I would assume that Cooley & Gang kept the recording of the woman that left an anonymous tip about my friendship with Phil Spector. If not - they destroyed “evidence” which the Duty Agent in Denver told me is criminal.
All the best,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Alan Jackson and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office - including Steve Cooley,
Take a look at the lunatic cyber-terrorists who are dead set on slandering me and undermining my credibility. Unfortunately, they are all liars. Someone dragged me into the Phil Spector murder trial and I personally believe that someone is Leonard Cohen - although Brian Bennett told me it was an anonymous tip placed by a woman to the District Attorney. Hopefully, you’ve saved that recording because I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko - the Treasury Department, Phil Spector and his legal team to listen to it. Blogonaut, who you were in touch with, continues to monitor my whereabouts. A friend of mine just pointed out that the people on these Blogs (and emailing me) know far too much about me.
Leonard Cohen appears to have committed criminal tax fraud. He is and will always be a pathelogical liar and calculated fraud. If he was your witness in a grand jury against Phil Spector that is your problem. My problem: that my parents and children have been dragged into this and targeted. If you think I believe that you care about Lana Clarkson you better get real. I think you are some of the biggest criminals in the United States of America. I think you are corrupt. I think you set up an innocent man. I think you intentionally maligned and slandered Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, Dr. James Pex, and Dr. Vincent DeMaio and I think you have to be hitting the crack pipe if you actually believe that five of the greatest forensic scientists in America would all take the witness stand and lie. It - and you - insults the intelligence.
Perhaps major federal agencies are involved in a prank here. And perhaps they are not. I believe you, Cohen, Lindsey, and others, have exposed me to dangerously unstable people and I believe some of those people (Stephen Gianelli - who wanted to know if Investigator Frayeh told me Dixon’s good looking) have “motive.” I know for a fact he lied to the FBI and I happen to be convinced that this is a crime.
For the record, I don’t have sexual fantasies about men like Dixon who I think has engaged in a set up. Are we clear?
If Blogonaut-Gianelli found a sympathetic ear with you, Jackson, then you are totally out of your mind.
I believe that you have exposed me and my family (including my children) to these lunatics. And, I intend to send Phil Spector my letter to you (Jackson) and I doubt he’ll find it all that funny. After all, he knows he’s innocent: he witnessed Clarkson shoot herself at his house. I think the DEA should investigate that and I think they should investigate Ogden’s death. That was also drug related and it’s at the heart of your “media circus” and legal farce.
Kelley Lynch
cc: Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko - the Treasury Department
80 Responses to “MAILBAG: “Leonard Cohen Is Not A ‘Great Man’””
November 19th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
For the record, if you think this is a “game” for Phil Spector then you do not know Phil Spector. You definitely don’t know me.
Kelley Lynch
cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
dumpstevecooley.blogspot.com
November 19th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , joffbelark@gmail.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “karen@mccourt.org” , “david@mccourt.org”
Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 8:54 PM
Hello,
I continue to assume that “Another Kelley Lynch victim” is someone either affiliated with Gianelli-Blogonaut or IS Gianelli-Blogonaut. It now weighs in on witness tampering. I can assure you that I don’t think an inanimate object - say a Blog - witness tampered. I am saying that Gianelli-Blogonaut and others do.
I see the lunatic is very very focused on my holiday activities. Who I spend the holidays with is my business and not the business of strangers who engage in cyber-terrorism and are monitoring my activities. And most certainly not lunatics and criminals that “lie” to the FBI and speak for so many federal agencies and Phil Spector’s legal team and former attorney.
Actually, I was told I need a litigator and I am consulting a litigator. Fraud tolls the statute and until the IRS and State of Kentucky give me the Opinion Letters I have requested and some investigations are done - into things like whether or not Cohen, Lindsey, et al. conspired to have me falsely arrested and issues relating to Killer King, etc. - I don’t think I should be put in the legal position of having to guess. I was also told the key issue here is jurisdiction which I will leave to my extremely competent criminal attorney who understands that I am dealing with criminal issues. The FBI Duty Agent in Denver appeared to understand this when we discussed witness and evidence tampering. Apart from the evidence I filed with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s Fraud in Boulder I have a policy: do not touch evidence. Dan Scheid, Greenberg’s lawyer, has already informed me that they have evidence that relates to Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Steven Clark Lindsey and Betsy Superfon.
I don’t think “witness tampering” is really an art. I think it’s a crime that carries prison terms.
All the best,
Kelley
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
“Witness tampering” is a legal term of art that excludes blog comments.
One can only wonder if KL’s life is in order, and she has the “full support” of her family in Texas, who she is leaving Texas for another state on the eve of the Thanksgiving and christmas Hollidays.
As for the “crimianl attorney” that Lynch is keeping apprised of this matter in connection with her desire to sue Cohen,–for that KL will need a civil litigation attorney, and moreover an attorney with the ability to trun back time
November 19th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Gianelli/Blogonaut,
I intend to file a complaint with the police department in the State I am visiting in the near future. It will state that I believe you are criminally harassing my son and cyber-stalking me, monitoring my activities, etc. I will explain that you are also witness tampering, etc. Assume I’m bluffing.
Kelley Lynch
November 19th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
When you arrive in California late tomorrow to visit your son Rutger courtesy of a bus ticket provided by the Star of Hope and stop by to report us to your local police department please be sure to mention that you have outstanding warrants for your arrest and to give the nice officer the contact information for our attorney, Stephen R. Gianelli, who would be happy to fill the officer in on your activities and current legal status.
Please do mention your arrest record in Los Angeles, California and Bounder Colorado and how all of this is pursuant to a grand conspiracy against you because you have been “targeted” to discredit you as a witness to Leonard Cohen’s “tax fraud” that you reported five years ago (with no prosecution).
November 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
PS: do not forget to mention to then nice officer your claim that you were “kidnapped” by the LAPD and taken to a psychiatric facility against your will (Killer King), your previously published belief that LA Swat was there to “murder” you to silence you, as well as your claim that the LAPD then falsified its report as well as the Killer King records in order to “discredit” you as a witness against Cohen—all aid the “set up” of Phil Spector on murder charges. Please do also mention that this is only one of two involuntary psychiatric commitments that you have suffered.
November 19th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Kelley, how many more years are you going to waste repeating the same tired nonsense and threats? No one would have anything to say to you if you did not continually post accusations, threaten to report, and subpoena everyone who comments on your postings, or dared to disagree with you. If you don’t want people to post comments about and to you, then stop posting these things on the internet. It is really very simple. Stop writing all the tired accusations, and no one will write to you. Show us a retainer agreement with an attorney, show us responses from any of the law enforcement agencies you send mass-mailings to, show us one iota of proof of all the manifestations of evil you say are conspiring against you. When you do any of those things, I believe no one will bother you anymore. I certainly won’t.
November 19th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
November 19, 2009
Dear Kelley Lynch:
As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist slandering Blogonaut, this office, and any other persons affiliated with us, on the internet, including but not limited to your blogs, or otherwise.
If you fail to so desist, I will be suing you, David McCourt, Karen McCourt, Rutger Penick, and all other persons whom you have claimed to Blogonaut in writing have aided and encouraged you to pursue this course of action.
Please govern yourself accordingly.
By email, we are so informing David, Karen, and Rudger.
This office is well aware of your current whereabouts in California, and is fully prepared to sue you, Rutger, Karen and David forthwith, should you post a single additional disparaging comment about Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, including the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
Stephen R. Gianelli
PO Box 475013
San Francisco, California 94147
(415) 929-5130
CC; Karen McCourt, David McCourt, Rudger Penick
November 20th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
Blogonaut - what’s your interest in my whereabouts and why are you emailing my son Rutger your threats and lies? I could care less about a smoking and camping warrant. The “homeless court” would have thrown them out. Believe me - when I arrive at my destination I’m taking your postings/emails into law enforcement (probably the FBI) and asking them to investigate why you are harassing and stalking me.
Kelley Lynch
November 20th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
fromKelley Lynch
todoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
ASKDOJ ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
mayor@cityofhouston.net
cc”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov
Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM
To the Houston FBI,
I am presently in Houston, Texas. This man, Gianelli/Blogonaut, is dead set on monitoring my actions, harassing me and my son, threatening me and my son, slandering me, lying about me, etc. I am leaving Texas and intend to make an appointment and sit down with an FBI agent when I reach my destination. Please see pertinent documents at my cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com Blog. This relates to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and the Phil Spector murder trial set up and I can assure you it’s deadly serious. Gianelli-Blogonaut has already lied to Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland.
Trust me - this individual has “motive.” He has also been in contact with Investigator Frayeh who was an investigator in the Phil Spector matter. And, he has been in touch with Leonard Cohen’s legal team.
Kelley Lynch
http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/pertinent-documents-for-fawning.html
November 20th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
fromKelley Lynch
todoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
ASKDOJ ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
mayor@cityofhouston.net
cc”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov
dateFri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM
subjectRe: Houston FBI
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 11:05 AM (0 minutes ago)
To the Houston FBI,
I was held hostage by a SWAT Team (comprised of LAPD and Inglewood PD). They told my son they were going to shoot me. Apparenty my dog was my “hostage” and they were taking precautions. Chris/Homeland Security told me that it was entirely possible that the District Attorney or the Governor’s Office was behind some of this. People do conclude that the District Attorney had the power and motive to have me taken to Killer King - after all, I was questioned about Phil Spector en route and the entire file is falsified. This is a game for Gianelli/Blogonaut and he has apparenty concluded that Agent Wynar is an idiot who works at an agency called Full Blown Insanity. I have not claimed that LAPD falsified the Killer King report. I have asked, repeatedly, that this situation be investigated. While I was being taken to Killer King, my son Rutger (who just confirmed this in writing, again, by email that I sent to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury) was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory. He was asked to do this by my young son’s father who coordinated a custody matter. Leonard Cohen’s lawyer filed a “Declaration” in that matter - as did Betsy Superfon. There is evidence in Boulder, Colorado that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested. And that brings me to why I initially contacted the FBI in Denver; because there is evidence of criminal witness tampering in Boulder, Colorado. They advised me to go into the FBI in Los Angeles - which I did. Then, because activity on the part of law enforcement was crossing state line I began calling the FBI in Denver. The Duty Agent I’m not arguing with apparently doesn’t think LAPD was behind Officer Storbeck’s rolling into Deneuve Construction where I worked. I think they were involved because I had just left a message for “Officer Hampton” (one of the officers who took me to Killer King) and “Officer Garrin” was incredibly pissed off.\
The other “involuntary commitment” happened because - and this is documented - I mentioned the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Fortunately, when UCLA Harbor realized I called Steven Segal they released me. It’s a Hollywood story.
All the best,
Kelley Lynch
November 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
November 20th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
fromKelley Lynch
todoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
ASKDOJ ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Joff Belark ,
mayor@cityofhouston.net
cc”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
mpduke1@msn.com
dateFri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:11 AM
subjectCorrecting Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Public Lies, Slander, and Evidence of Cyber-Terrorism, Stalking, Etc.
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 11:11 AM (1 minute ago)
To the Houston FBI,
Here’s what I also know - Gianelli is Blogonaut and, therefore, based on this letter he appears to be a schizophrenic. My Mother thinks he is truly unstable and that I have now been exposed to dangerously unstable people. I am not in California. If you would like to meet me at the Star of Hope - they have been advised that they may divulge the fact that I am staying there to the FBI. Gianelli-Blogonaut has no idea where I intend to go but I intend to go into the FBI immediately. I want to sit down with an Agent and review the posts and emails I have received. I think Rutger should go into the FBI in Los Angeles on his end, as well.
As the Duty Agent in Denver noted; the activity connected to these matters is taking place all across the country.
Gianelli-Blogonaut has also threatened my sister and her husband.
All the best,
Kelley Lynch
Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
November 19, 2009
Dear Kelley Lynch:
As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.
November 20th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
For the record, I think Cohen has wasted unbelievable government resources - attempting to cover up his tax fraud that I was told is criminal and reported. Gianelli/Blogonaut clearly has serious motive to undermine me, slander me, obstruct justice, witness tamper, threaten me and my family - including my son Rutger. This shameless thug should definitely be investigated and prosecuted. That is my personal opinion and I could care less if he’s a licensed attorney. He should also be disbarred based upon what I’ve witnessed. And, he continues to raise Alan Jackson as an issue. What is he - Jackson’s protector?
I intend to go into the FBI when I arrive at my destination and will sit down and discuss Gianelli-Blogonaut’s emails, posts, lie disguised as an article, and possible motive.
Kelley Lynch
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Investigator William Frayeh
To: “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, joffbelark@gmail.com
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , “ASKDOJ” , “*irs. commissioner” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Joff Belark” , mayor@cityofhouston.net, “Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, mpduke1@msn.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, teresa.low@doj.ca.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, pio@lapd.lacity.org, oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org, chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, governor@governor.ca.gov, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Duane” , rand.hoffman@umusic.com, lwieseltier@tnr.com
Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 5:29 PM
Hello Investigator Frayeh,
As I explained to you, I am addressing all the lies, slander, fraud, etc. circulating about me on the internet and - in particular - being set forth in emails, on Blogs, etc. by Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut who phoned you to determine whether or not you made an off-the-cuff remark about Dixon being good looking. Somehow that turned into my having a sexual fantasy about a man I do not know, could care less about, and who I happen to think set up my friend Phil Spector. That’s a very very twisted allegation. I don’t believe my allegations are false. As I said to you, I think these are felonies. This man is monitoring my actions and is attempting to threaten my son Rutger and my sister and her husband. My Mother was concerned these maniacs and lunatics would also target them.
Every single word uttered and written by this man, about me, is a lie. I have now contacted - via email - the Houston FBI. I am in Texas - not California - but clearly Gianelli-Blogonaut has motive to monitor my actions. He has lied to Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland. He has been in touch with Cohen’s legal team and offered to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen and stated that Cohen would be willing to help me. In fact, I can get my life back - including my children. Alan Jackson, as you and I discussed, contacted Gianelli-Blogonaut. That is an incredibly serious matter to me and one can safely assume that it is an incredibly serious matter for Phil Spector.
This man has no decency. He has no boundaries. He is arrogant. He is a liar. I advised Agent Wynar last night that I believe he should be arrested. That is putting it mildly. My friends think the FBI should seize his and Jackson’s computers.
The reason you are copied in on this email is because you and I did not have an agreement that I would stop writing Gianelli/Blogonaut, stop correcting the lies and slander, or that I should stop emailing Jackson. You advised me to remove Jackson from my emails for ten days. And, you suggested that I ignore Gianelli/Blogonaut. Would you, as I asked Agent Wynar, permit this individual to lie about you, your children, contact the Boulder Police Department about your son’s email, threaten your sister and her husband, urge LAPD and Boulder PD to arrest and/or target me further, and then sit back and do nothing? I find it impossible to believe that any human being, any parent, any daughter or son, would sit by idly while terrorists attempt to destroy their lives and their credibility - while targeting their children and family members.
This man is twisted. He is sadistic. And, trust me, he has motive.
All the best,
Kelley
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
Subject: Re: You are now in Sunnyvale, CA
To: “Kelley Lynch” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “Rutger Penick”
Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 5:03 PM
November 20, 2009
Ms: Lynch:
The undersigned has been subjected to more slander from you that anyone should be required to endure.
When you represented in September that you would stop sending emails to us and Mr. Jackson, Blogonaut deleted 4 posts and stopped posting about you.
Your emails stopped until a couple days ago, but you continued to disparage the undersigned and Blogonaut on your two twisted blogs with dozens of additional posts falsely accusing licensed attorneys of various felony offenses.
This is called libel per se, meaning that the plaintiff need not prove economic loss to prevail and to recover general and punitive damages.
I know that you do not care if you are sued—you have an unpaid $9,000,000.00 judgment against you and have violated several restraining orders in multiple instances, so one more lawsuit is not going to be of concern to you.
But it will concern Karen Lynch, David McCourt, and your eldest son—all of whom you have stated in writing have been supporting and encouraging your Internet activities—because if another word is posted about either Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, I will be suing not only you, but also Karen, David, and your son and we can let the court sort out whether you told the truth by claiming they have aided and abetted your serial libel.
In the meantime, we have nothing more to say to you and we will not respond to any more of your pathological communications.
If you care at all about Karen, David, and your son, you will cease and desist.
–Stephen R. Gianelli
November 20th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
To cut to the chase:
1. Kelley Lynch ha already sent over 400 emails to the IRS, the Justice Department, state attorney’s general, local DA’s, Treasury Agent Kelley Sopko, governors, mayors, media outlets and a hundred other email recipients falsely accusing me of “cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation”, and other serious felony crimes.
2. She started doing this because she hijacked a blog that I am counsel for, Blogonaut, posted 60+ items falsely accusing various persons of serious crimes (manufacturing meth, child molestation, tax fraud, and other crimes) and was then banned from the blog. I then addressed Kelley Lynch’s emails and attempted comments on the blog that she had apprised high profile attorney Bruce Cutler of the situation and had asked him to look into suing Blogonaut.
I sent Cutler a letter, he immediately phoned me, and we thereafter had several cordial telephone conversations wherein Cutler made it clear that he did not represent Lynch, he did not know Lynch, he had never even spoken to or written Lynch, but that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him 10 to 20 very long harassing voice messages for him EVERY DAY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, and that Mr. Cutler regarded Kelley Lynch as the “worst telephone stalker I have ever encountered”. Cutler also told me that Lynch had been sending him hundreds of very long (50+ page) unsolicited and ranting faxes daily for several months until his office complained to her then employer, who stopped the faxes from Lynch’s workplace.
3. Kelley Lynch cc’d Blogonaut with scores of emails to high profile security consultant to Phil Spector Bill Pavelic, including a very disturbing email wherein Lynch, in the conversational style of old, good friends, asked that he assemble a team of investigators to investigate me, several Cohen attorneys, and man other persons. I emailed Bill Pavelic who informed me that he had absolutely no association with Kelley Lynch “who is obviously a very disturbed woman”.
4. I emailed Treasury Agent Sopko, who called me back to advise that I should not be concerned with the scores of emails by Kelley Lynch to her demanding my arrest and prosecution because no reasonable person would regard Kelley Lynch as credible.
5. I have been in touch with an FBI agent who told me I had nothing to fear from Ms. Lynch’s many reports to the FBI because Lynch was a “classic 5150” (cop talk for nut job).
6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.
7. Kelley Lynch is a very sick and disturbed person, who in the past 48 hours has sent me and/or the blog I represent over 50 emails, several to her own family members (including her sister and son) cc to me, stating that her family members support her internet activities 100%, and that her eldest son (Rutger) is “eager” to join in a lawsuit against me, Blogonaut, and others. It is Lynch who involved her family in this very public slow motion meltdown hers, and not me or my client.
8. We were advised by the Treasury Department and the FBI to simply ignore Kelley Lynch, but enough is enough.
Personally, I have had it up to here, and will no longer remain silent about this internet and spam email bully—as mentally disturbed as she obviously is.
–Stephen R. Gianelli
415.929.5130
November 21st, 2009 at 1:04 am
Thank you for taking the time and energy needed to hopefully thrust some reality into Kelley and her madness-fed emails and blog posts. I’ve noticed since your previous post that her blog has pretty much been silent and she hasn’t posted anything more here either. Of course, this isn’t the first time she’s been silenced by threats of repercussions, but perhaps this one will stop her, or at least, if someone in her family realizes how deep she is in this crap, they will find a way to stop her. At any rate, I’m glad to see you will not take anymore of this nonsense.
Kelley, if you’re reading this (and I’m sure you are) this is your chance to back out gracefully, and then do something that will enable you to re-build your life. I think you have hit your bottom, and if you are willing to let go of the past, the only way you can go is up.
November 21st, 2009 at 6:41 am
Like Sidney I feel great sympathy and respect for Stephen Gianelli, he has certainly been very patient and forgiving and it is very understandable that he now feels enough is enough.
Sadly I don’t share Sidney’s optimism that this warning will deter Kelley Lynch from further harassment and slander of Mr. Gianelli, Mr. Cohen and others. I believe her illsness is so advanced that she can understand no other reasoning but her own. I believe the only thing that can save Kelley (and her victims) is a major intervention involving her family, mental health care professionals and possible law enforcement.
I truely hope her family has enough love and courage to initiate such and intervention.
Susanne
November 22nd, 2009 at 2:23 am
Bravo to Mr. Gianelli and Blogonaut! Finally someone is putting the skids to this cyberterrorist. Since she always threatens to, someday, sue most of us and she spams most of those she intends to sue, could her email bullying be construed as witness intimidation? Oh, well, I’m sure until she reaches her next destination, she’ll be quiet—she has a pattern of fleeing to other locations and re-establishing her cyberterrorism.
I know the holidays are approaching. However, I’m truly, truly saddened that, as of yet, no one in her life cares about her enough or loves her enough to get her psychiatric help. From experience, I know it’s neither easy nor pleasant to insist a loved one get psychiatric care—but it must be done. I sure Kelley’s family would prefer to be involved in anything but this situation. Joan, Karen, David, and Rutger it’s now time for you to step-up and commence the actions that will ensure Kelley gets the help she so desperately needs. It won’t be easy (perhaps the SOH will assist you) but you and everyone in cyberspace know it must be done. If you are unable to do so, perhaps once she settles in her next location total strangers will step-up-to-the-plate and begin Chapter 51 proceedings (5150). Clearly, the time has come for you to insist Kelley get professional help.
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I will respond to any legal complaint and intend to subpoena Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Agent Wynar - FBI, Agent Sopko - Treasury, Agent Tejeda - IRS Los Angeles, and - of course - Leonard Cohen.
My son didn’t say he wants to join me in a suit against Blogonaut. He wants to join me in a lawsuit against other parties that he has been damaged by. He can speak to his own attorneys about any damages that may have arisen due to the communications he has received from Gianelli-Blogonaut.
I have just left a message for Agent Wynar/FBI Oakland with respect to Gianelli’s public allegations. With respect to Agent Sopko-Treasury: she can speak for herself and the Treasury. She cannot speak for me and she most certainly cannot speak for Phil Spector.
Put your money where your mouth is Gianelli and file your legal complaint and email it to me. I will accept service via email and I will absolutely see you in court and will absolutely subpoena the individuals I have listed above and others.
My family thinks you are completely out of your mind.
With respect to Susanne Walsh and Sydney - please continue to speak to one another. Perhaps - you two who do not know me at all - can appear in court as his witnesses.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:09 pm
For the record, my sister and her husband did not write and ask me to cease anything. I have spoken with Rutger and Gianelli is misrepresenting him - as usual. I don’t know Bill Pavelic and am uninterested in what he has to say. He worked for Phil Spector and Phillip is my friend. Bill Pavelic was his investigator. With respect to Bruce Cutler - he can take the stand for himself and testify that Gianelli has accurate represented their conversations. I will ask Phil Spector to invoke that privilege.
Joff Belark, Gianelli’s lying “reporter,” wrote to say I’m in Sunnyvale, California. That is - as usual - a lie.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Gianneli,
Just to correct a few more lies. Karen and David McCourt have never advised me, nor have I confirmed this for you, that they support any internet activity of mine.
I continue to personally believe that you have engaged in cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation,” and a coercive attempt to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen who you stated was willing to help me.
I did not hijack your Blog. I posted positive remarks about Phil Spector and the truth about Leonard Cohen. I also attempted to respond to Joff Belark’s lie disguised as an article. It is slander and nothing else. Freda Guttman repeated Lorca Cohen’s accusations that her father molested her. My friend Michael confirmed that the FBI in Dallas was investigating his uncle for possible connections to meth labs. Michael himself write me and the DOJ was copied in that his uncle is extremely dangerous and the FBI was already investigating his connection to a possible murder. What is frivolous about that and what would you know about that?
Bruce Cutler, as I’ve said, was Phil Spector’s attorney. I intend to print this Blog’s comments - yours in particular - out and mail them with a letter to Phil Spector. He can address anything that has to do with Bruce Cutler and me - including your deranged letter to him which I view as your attempt to further insert yourself into his matter. Your call to Investigator Frayeh is evidence of that as well. And then there are your communications with Cohen’s advisers. Clearly these are serious issues. Bruce Cutler did not send a complaint to my employer about my faxes. I received a note from his office and he was not a complaint. I have a copy of that and will file that in response to any legal complaint I receive from you or my own complaint that I will file against you.
Bill Pavelic does not know me. “Disturbed” hardly begins to describe how I feel about the targeting of my children.
Sopko has no legal right to discuss my views on anything. She can speak for herself and I will speak for myself. I continue to believe your actions with respect to me should be investigated and no one on earth will convince me otherwise.
I will subpoena the conversation you had with Agent Wynar to confirm this. Agent Wynar might be a nut job if he said this and doesn’t see right through you.
I don’t know if you are sick and disturbed or merely a criminal.
Maybe the Treasury and FBI can tell Phil Spector that he shouldn’t investigate why you contacted Investigator Frayeh who was an investigator in his “murder” trial since they have plenty to say on so many matters.
You are going to prove every single allegation you have raised, Gianelli, and if you think I won’t respond to any legal complaint, subpoena the parties I’ve listed above and possibly others, then you don’t know me. I will also demand a jury trial.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Kelley, I am a little surprised that you are not taking the current issues more seriously. Baiting someone to sue you for libel is a very foolish thing to do. If you think Mr. Gianelli is joking about this situation you are very, very mistaken. The more posts from you denigrating him and/or Blogonaut, the more evidence he/they have to present at Court. This is a serious situation and you need to heed the warnings you have been given about your behavior. You will not get served this suit be email, you will be personally served. You cannot run and hide from this as you have done in the past when faced with legal consequences for your behavior and actions. Do keep in mind that your son, sister and brother-in-lay will be co-defendants in this suit and if you do not show, they will have to pay for your activities. Your present postings contain lies about all this - i.e, you saying you don’t know Bill Pavelic. Your past postings prove that to be a lie. And this is not the only lie you have told for the past several years. I cannot speak for Susanne Walsh nor for Kelly Green, but I can speak for myself. If Mr. Gianelli sees any way I can be of service in his suit against you, I will be happy to do so. The gig is up Kelley. It’s payback time. Your silence from this point on is the only option you have if you want to avoid public exposure of your hatefulness and self-absorbed rantings. If you will not withdraw because of the penalties you will face, at least think about your family members and the penalties they will face because of you.
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Sydney, save it for someone who cares - like Gianelli.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Gianelli,
File the legal complaint. I look forward to my legal response and calling Cohen to the stand. It shouldn’t be hard to subpoena Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan - they’re in the Bay Area. I think I’ll also subpoena Dale Burgess who knows that Cohen offered me 50% community property - presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers. A laughable notion based upon his disdain for ordinary income taxes - and that’s before we get into his hatred of “gift taxes.” Put your money where your mouth is: write your complaint, file it, and post it here. I’ll respond and will subpoena the individuals I’ve mentioned. Agent Wynar can explain his comments to you.
My son, sister, and brother-in-law haven’t said anything about Gianelli so it might be hard to sue them for anything. Rutger did, however, write Gianelli that he thought he was threatening him. I’ll ask Rutger’s attorneys to take a look at Gianelli’s postings and threats.
I’m not baiting anyone and speaking the truth is not libel. You, on the other hand, have lied and slandered me and we will see who prevails in court.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 6:03 pm
P.S. Gianelli, call up the Dallas FBI and have a laugh over Michael’s uncle. Maybe you can insert yourself into that situation also.
November 22nd, 2009 at 6:12 pm
For the record, Sydney, I don’t know Bill Pavelic. He sent me some emails - a couple about Phil Spector, one about some utterly abusive situation with a Swedish woman and the Los Angeles District Attorney (that he called more profound than Phillip’s set up) and some others. So, I’m not lying. I don’t know him. He has said the same.
I am noting, Sydney, that you are threatening my family members.
Why continue with the banter. Gianelli should file his lawsuit and I will respond. That’s what the justice system is for. Gianelli is going to prove that he is a pathelogical liar who has inserted himself into Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal and the Phil Spector trial. I also intend to subpoena Investigator Frayeh. Gianelli should know that I can subpoena people - that is my legal right. He cannot, in court, speak for Wynar, the FBI, Sopko, or the Treasury. That is hearsay. These people will be forced to testify and explain their comments. It’s that simple.
I want to go over Cohen’s residence issues with him on the stand in the Lynch and Gianelli matter. I want to be certain he’s actually a resident - since he abandoned a green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and obtained a new one in 1991. Also, because issues with perjury are serious and possible prior bad acts I want to review his numerous social security issues. He shouldn’t have any difficulty remembering his residence issues and how he filed tax returns with the green card he abandoned. I don’t think these are issues you can address, Sydney and I personally think you are a seriously unstable person.
Kelley Lynch
Fifth Amendment Rights of Resident and Non-Resident Aliens
Resident Aliens. A resident alien enjoys the rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment that would be afforded any citizen and a resident alien may invoke these rights in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory. Among the rights bestowed under the Fifth Amendment is the right to refuse to give any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used.” United States. v. Balsys, 524 U.S. 666 (1998); Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 444-45 (1972) Kwong Hat Chew v. Colding 344 U.S. 590 (1953).
November 22nd, 2009 at 6:31 pm
Sydney, who cares if I am personally served the lawsuit. What is that - a threat? I will personally respond to the lawsuit and I will subpoena people - including Agent Wynar to explain his comments. It’s very straightforward Sydney. How could you be of any help to Gianelli? You don’t know me and you are lying about me, gossiping, and you appear to be threatening me and my family? Stop gossiping and tell Gianelli to file his Complaint. I will respond. I will request a jury trial. I will subpoena the people I have noted above. And I definitely will appear in Court. I understand how the legal system works and Gianelli, you, and others, are not my judge and jury. The judge and jury will be the judge and jury. The trial lawyer, Gianelli, should understand this. He should also understand slander but apparently doesn’t. That’s not my problem. A jury will decide the issues - based on evidence and witness testimony. Not you. Not Gianelli. And not the “feds.” Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 6:32 pm
http://law.jrank.org/pages/10304/Sixth-Amendment-Compulsory-Process-Favorable-Witnesses.html
November 22nd, 2009 at 7:23 pm
I have questioned your sanity; however, I never believed you to be stupid. I was wrong.
It’s time for you to take other posters seriously. It’s time for you to be concerned about your family–think about how much your actions are going to cost them. Can they afford to pay for your actions?
November 22nd, 2009 at 7:34 pm
Green, who cares what you’ve questioned. You do not know me and you have not reviewed the evidence I sent to the IRS and others. You do not have the corporate books, records, notarized documents, etc. and you probably do not know Cohen. I do and I know what I’ve witnessed for approximately 20 years. That includes his utter disdain for ordinary income taxes, the laws of this country, and - obviously - perjury. Someone was horrified this morning when they heard how he targeted me and my children and noted that he is a con artist. That sums him up perfectly.
I am not taking you seriously. I don’t know you and I could care less about you. I am merely noting that you continue to threaten my family and I have asked Phawker to maintain copies of all IP addresses. That is very very straightforward. I am going into Court and if they are named - sobeit. I will address that with the Court and I will have my sister and brother-in-law on the phone. Gianelli should be well aware that the Court can include people in trials and hearings telephonically. I am taking his threat to litigate this seriously and actually look forward to responding to his garbage, lies, and slander - in the proper venue. He should take this seriously - the fact that I intend to subpoena Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler (telephonically), Phil Spector (telephonically), Agent Wynar-FBI, Agent Sopko-Treasury (telephonically), Agent Tejeda-IRS (telephonically), and of course - Cohen. I would prefer him to attend telephonically (as I requested when I noticed him properly of the Special Meeting of Traditional Holdings, LLC which he chose not to attend and did not provide evidence of his investment in that entity … because it doesn’t exist), and others.
You’re right. I’m not stupid. I also don’t have “motive.”
I want the Court to pay particular attention to the threats being issued against my son, Rutger. And, of course, a jury. It horrifies ordinary human beings but then so does this entire situation.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 8:01 pm
Kelley, like Kelly Green, I never thought of you as a stupid person. That has all changed, however. No one on this blog or any of the multiple other blogs you post your nonsense to has ever threatened you or anyone in your family. All the threats have been made by YOU. Anyone who disagrees with you gets threatened. Anyone who posts a comment disputing your slanderous comments gets threatened. The list goes on ad nauseam. I thought you were an intelligent woman who simply got into some trouble and as a result, made some bad choices by taking your emotion-based delusions to the internet. Not anymore. If indeed you were once an intelligent, functioning adult, you are no longer that person. I feel sorry for you; I also feel sorry for your sons and your sister and brother-in-law, but mostly I feel sorry for your mother. I can only imagine how ashamed and embarrassed she must be to have her daughter toss everything she ever taught her about honor, dignity and truth get thrown in the garbage like you have done to her. Shame on you Kelley Lynch, shame on you.
November 22nd, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Green, how do you reconcile your statements about my family (threats actually) with Blogonaut/Gianelli’s who seem to be one and the same. Are you saying you have legal issues with me. I tend to doubt that unless a court thinks they can tell me that I am not permitted to perceive people who act like thug morons as just that. Maybe the thought police can declare my perceptions illegal. Perhaps, as well, Gianelli would like to post my sister’s letter which I intend to subpoena from him since I didn’t receive one. I saw Rutger’s - he asked Gianelli/Blogonaut to stop contacting him and noted that he felt he was being “threatened.”
Kelley Lynch
6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.
November 22nd, 2009 at 8:18 pm
If you feel sorry for my Mother then you will understand that she thinks you are insane and unstable people who are targeting her family. I think what people understand is that I am an intelligent woman who made the “unfortunate” decision to report Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS, supplied the IRS with evidence, and made some decisions based on the fact that DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess confirmed what I suspected - that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and “exposed” me to it. This is so easy for everyone I speak with to follow. I understand that Cohen’s fans and people with motive or an interest in preserving his credibility don’t want to acknowledge this.
Since you don’t know my family would you mind refraining from speaking on their behalf. Your intuitive statements made on behalf of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan might be acceptable - to them - but I know my family and know how they feel. I might note, at this point, that they also happen to know Cohen. In fact, my Mother sees right through him.
Kelley Lynch
I thought you were an intelligent woman who simply got into some trouble and as a result, made some bad choices by taking your emotion-based delusions to the internet.
November 22nd, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Of course, I also wasn’t in Sunnyvale, California and, of course, can also prove this. I never said it was a federal crime to threaten litigation. I said I think Gianelli, Blogonaut, and others have engaged in what I personally believe is obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness intimidation, witness retaliation, harassment, cyber-stalking, stalking, etc. I also happen to believe Gianelli-Blogonaut made a coercive offer to put me in touch with Cohen who was apparently willing to help me. He only has to pay me what he owes me. That too is very very straightforward. The assets were valued by Moss Adams numerous times so the forensic accounting I have requested shouldn’t be that difficult. Zia Modabber didn’t even think it would be that expensive. Zia Modabber, an attorney I met with, understood this: artist management partings are like divorces. And that’s probably why Cohen likes it when people say I am a whore, alcoholic, drug addict, etc. Perhaps he should take a good hard look in the mirror and check out what’s reflected back. This is truly becoming a “we see right through you but you don’t think we do” situation. The fact that Cohen, a Canadian, decided to live in the United States appears to be a dead giveaway as to his tax fraud. The fact that Cohen has affiliated himself with all of you - and in particular “Gianelli” - is further evidence to me that the man is positively insane and deranged. Then again, there’s “Kory” - a laughable excuse for a lawyer. As someone said: “Does Cohen actually pay for his legal advice?” I know he didn’t pay Peter Lopez the $90,000 he owed him for the CAK bond deal that so concerned Robert Kory. Kelley Lynch
from Joff Belark
to Kelley Lynch
date Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:32 AM
subject Re: IRS Commissioner’s Staff - “to protect his assets from the taxman!!!”
mailed-by gmail.com
signed-by gmail.com
hide details Nov 20 (2 days ago)
Dear Ms. Lynch:
It is not strange at all.
Every time you send someone an email, the Internet Protocol address (“IP” address) of the computer that you sent the email from, and the location of that IP address can be quite easily retrieved with the use of the right software. Every computer has one, and the IP address is unique.
By way of illustration and example, the header from this email was analyzed with the result below:
Analysis:
Return-Path:
Received: from web43407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (web43407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [68.180.198.211]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id 7si5118647iwn.76.2009.11.20.09.59.11; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com designates 68.180.198.211 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.180.198.211;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com designates 68.180.198.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 90889 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2009 17:59:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258739951; bh=dOTmpEnG2i6XcaueUxfquYVK1AMub8ssAleVoO1SLWg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QQN9b5xjIMNShpzfmIPYnHUnh+zzOrtg7hcgdZ1lkm1rutJGk/E3sN17npgIF6pPDmj4TCX4QTCP1YX/3/DY52IPrpoWGi/CiymNwmx0CiF4FjTU9sf+7BqGea0+xnALTrvz60WuHzvxXLGyE6Qpxtgl04yMJMt7Xo72v2MXI+c=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iQOwGv/Z9rluu7xZxhPNz9ekXMU9rvH9Kxz5KWMQiSRyjkoPUtElvaNL9ZgdsK32sLj11R7G2Akr8UblZodvWwRfBinru0tFMAtqqsAb6qmYiAIAU61qpdWNQIfJg5iiOUcbYf+k9qVH6+EsxLKm74XH4qOSSm5oG8gMyWdfNgk=;
Message-ID:
X-YMail-OSG: SR5bV0MVM1nTpN71u.SIXpnTntQ1rCIXD5Lbbo0ZWBr6udG92OVVB8IrnCPwiZeozXLfwPVGByvk4tKDFLTfnQ8E919lDhtWzG1t3znGSl_HeUfqOLMl9.epAqdOq_vx5YLH8khI8EPv671aAPsqWCC3asmdIj9B75F3HwnzvwcQ3PxcmO_JYhs2SDJXLqUPPvMleN7GsIoH.VvlWWUzoOnhRcjlQHnO9vaiQcyKAw3q7TgbFmN4naBh4CKVHffvpm3IwW1MpYryWOCk8SV0oa1J_SNpVS41UNHs21ek0gbk4zzt6h8v99CA4WzFfvoP_48fDaoiBK4F7r3sejtnd.IQS1iAAUrZzcfY7A–
Received: from [68.142.215.21] by web43407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:59:10 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:59:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - Gianelli\’s Definitely Threatening My Family
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, joffbelark@gmail.com
Cc: doronweinberg , Dennis , ASKDOJ , \”*irs. commissioner\” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Jewel of Activity , Blogonaut Law-Blog , STEPHEN GIANELLI , Joff Belark , mayor@cityofhouston.net, \”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov\” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, mpduke1@msn.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, teresa.low@doj.ca.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, pio@lapd.lacity.org, oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org, chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, governor@governor.ca.gov, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, becknerm , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, Maurice Smith , moseszzz@mztv.com, Duane , rand.hoffman@umusic.com, lwieseltier@tnr.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\”0-1401337968-1258739950=:88881\”
Source:
The source host name is “r1.ycpi.mud.yahoo.net” and the source IP address is 68.142.215.21.
Geo-Location Information
Country
United States
State/Region
CA
City
Sunnyvale
Postal Code
94089
Latitude
37.4249
Longitude
-122.0074
Area Code
408
One can then easily look up further information about the subject computer’s IP address:
68.142.215.22 - Geo Information
IP Address
68.142.215.22
Host
r2.ycpi.mud.yahoo.net
Location
US, United States
City
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Organization
Inktomi Corporation
ISP
Inktomi Corporation
AS Number
AS14780
At the request of our attorney I am not going to be responding to further emails. However, if you do not wish to be “tracked” then you should stop sending emails to persons whom you do now wish to know your whereabouts.
And BTW, if it was a federal crime for an attorney to threaten litigation, there would be no lawyers. A comforting thought to some, perhaps, but hardly the law.
All the best,
JB
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 pm
P.S. I think Belark, proving himself to be a moron, found Inktomi. I’m very happy to see that Belark continues to view my emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others as a joke and a game.
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:01 pm
Kelley, don’t you think that if your accusations of “taxfraudthatIwastoldiscriminal” was in any way seen as having any merit that the IRS would have taken action by now? It has been a number of years and yet, no charges, no investigation, no nothing from the IRS. Doesn’t any of that sink into your brain? Now, I know I’m repeating what numerous people have stated numerous times over the past several years, but won’t you please just look into this? Your accusations have no merit - not to the IRS, the Treasury, the DOJ, the FBI, and the numerous others you constantly bother with your mass mailings. Give it up already - the world is tired of you. It’s time to re-embrace life, get your head screwed on straight, and get a grip. Enough already…
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm
Not necessarily. In fact, a number of excellent attorneys have informed me that one issue with the IRS is that they are slow. In fact, that has been the main issue certain attorneys have raised. So no - this does not prove that the IRS views Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal) as meritless. How would you know that there is no investigation? Do you work for the IRS? This is precisely what I want Agent Tejeda to address on the witness stand. Can he publicly discuss a pending IRS matter or investigation prior to it being made public and/or a complaint filed in court. That should be a very simple question for Agent Tejeda to respond to. I also want to ask him if the IRS takes allegations of criminal tax fraud with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million lightly, etc. I won’t look into your scenario. I intend to look into mine.
I see you are now speaking, publicly, on behalf of the IRS, the Treasury, the DOJ, and the FBI and I find that unacceptable and unwise. Nevertheless, that is their business - not mine. How can you say that my accusations have no merit to these agencies? Would you like to give me the agent’s name and badge number who told you this?
My head is screwed on straight. I know this bothers Cohen’s fan club and other people with motive to keep him credible and to crucify Phil Spector. It’s obvious. Please only speak for yourself. I think it’s rather imprudent to speak for others.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Gianelli, since you’ve decided to publicly post on Phawker about me I want you to be clear about this - anything you put in the mail that contains one lie about me or any type of fraudulent information at all will promptly be reported to the U.S. Postal Inspector. You are grandstanding, you are a liar, and you have slandered me and I will prove this in a court of law. You and your cyber-terrorist support group should understand this - I look forward to meeting you in court and my ultimate goal will be to see you disbarred for what you have done here - particularly as I personally am convinced that you have targeted my son Rutger who has lost his fingers and been through an unconscionable ordeal.
Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 11:51 pm
And Ms. Green, I intend to subpoena Dale Burgess. He was my accountant, who is in the Bay Area, and he witnessed the offer of 50% community property that Robert Kory, who had extraordinary negotiating power (according to Robert Kory) on behalf of Leonard Cohen. Dale Burgess can also explain to Gianelli, on the stand, why he felt there was fraud on all of Cohen’s “entities,” why he didn’t believe I was a partner on LC Investments, LLC, why he believes the assets are still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., and why he believed Criminal Intelligence of the IRS should be involved in Cohen’s tax fraud matter, and why he felt I should be in the witness protection program. He can also explain why he wanted me to advise the IRS and Treasury that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud. What they can explain to the IRS is why they wanted me to make a deal with Cohen. If you’re not a tax lawyer you might want to consult one before you post another lame, bogus remark. Kelley Lynch
November 22nd, 2009 at 11:55 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 4:00 AM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
I intend to report anyone who uses the U.S. mail to fraudulent target me (via lawsuits or whatever) to the Postal Inspector - that includes Gianelli. I also intend to subpoena any and all communications (emails, etc.) between Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark and Alan Jackson, the District Attorney’s Office, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers.
Love,
Kelley
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:09 am
Who in her right mind routinely signs correspondence to lawyers she’s never met “love”?
Ah, Lynch’s cyberterrorism continues. Where to begin…let’s see, at least twice you’ve instructed Phawker to save my IP address–let all in cyberspace know how those subpoenas are coming. Since you are living in a shelter, you can’t begin to pay for the subpoena service you’re going to need. I PROMISE you, if I’m served a subpoena I will report to court (thou you will, by law, have to pay for my travel and lodging) and MY ATTORNEY WILL IMMEDIATELY ASK THE JUDGE TO ORDER YOU TO SUBMIT TO A 5150 HEARING. ANY THE JUDGE WILL GRANT MY REQUEST–and your website will be all the proof I need. Apparently, none of you family or friends care enough about you to force you to get psych help–so I guess I, A TOTAL STRANGER, will be the one person to force the issue.
You’ve recently made reference to the need to subpeona a communiqe between you sister and Gianelli. It’s interesting that your family is now reaching out to those you claim terrorize them. As ususal, you are the only person who is a threat to your family.
On your webite you’ve gone to great pains to tell everyone that you want your family and the Feds to testify via telephone. Why don’t you want your family in the courtroom with you? Most families make a point of attending–you know they make sure you get your hair done and get you a new dress–inotherwords, they go out of their way to make their loved one is cleaned up so they appear credible. Again, why don’t you want them at your side?
I’m sure it won’t be long before, once again, Google shuts down you website. Perhaps Blogonaut will report you for theft. Once again, you have stolen from Blogonaut–and thanks to your links, this time, without any doubt, you’ve made a deliberate attempt to hijack his website. You seem to think that as long as you cite the source, it’s ok to steal things from other website and post that material on your sites. Well it’s not ok. It’s not ok to steal from Blogonaut; it’s not ok to steal from Phawker; and it’s not ok to steal from The New York Times. You’ve committed theft–copywrite infringement–theft of copywrited material. You have a narcissistic need for others to respond to you; however, you don’t have the guts or courage to open you websites to comments. You have a need to engage others but you don’t have the guts to do it on your turf.
How does that old adage go, “Once a thief….”
November 23rd, 2009 at 9:50 am
Kelley, you are always full of excuses for your behavior, and I’m quite sure you will be full of excuses when the time comes for all your subpoenas to be served on people. You won’t be in court to defend your unspeakable behavior and there will be no subpoenas served on your behalf. That’s because you have no case against anyone. And even if you did, you don’t have the resources to get those subpoenas served nor to pay for transportation for the people to come testify. You are a pathetic and sorry excuse for a woman, a mother, a sister and a daughter. Of course you want all those people to testify by phone - because you know good and well they won’t come to court and say what your delusions tell you they ought to say. You don’t mind exposing your entire family to embarrassment and shame, but I believe they have a serious problem with causing themselves any more shame. Give it up Kelley. Now that someone has finally decided to take action against you, do yourself a favor and be quiet. Every word you post anywhere on the internet will be used against you. Hopefully, as Kelly Green has said, someone will find enough love or caring in his/her heart to force a Chapter 51 action on you.
November 23rd, 2009 at 9:51 am
In Kelley Lynch’s limited univers exist only two types of people: The perpetrators and the victims. In spite of the fact that she herself initiated this ongoing bizarre discussion on various internet blogs, where she in an unusual mean-spirited and cruel way has made accusations and allegations about many people, she consider herself and her family the “victims”.
The “perpetrators are of couse Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Stephan Gianelli, Joff Belark and several casual bloggers who objects to her attacks, lies and slander. “We” are, in Ms. Lynch’s own words, criminals, thugs, maniacs, insane, stupid, hysterical, liars, slanderers, perjurers and much more.
The people Ms. Lynch considers sane, normal, ordinary, truthful, are her Mother, David, Karen, Rutger, Steven Segal, Philip Spector (and one of P.S.’s X-wives also a “dear friend”) Ann Diamond (whose slanderous gossip she continuously repeats), her “spiritual teachers and advisors” and of course “all the people who knows that Leonard Cohen is a dangerous, mean, talentless phony criminal”. She claims that all these people KNOW she (Lynch) is telling the truth and support her internet bullying.
Now what I find interesting is that in the several months I have been following this “ping-pong game” on the internet and read literally hundreds of postings disagreeing with Ms. Lynch perception of the truth, and have defended Leonard Cohen, Stephen Gianelli and others who have been brutally abused, but I have not seen one single post or mail condoning, supporting or defending Kelley Lynch and her behavior.
Ms. Lynch where are all these “sane, normal” people who support you and believe in you? Why are they not coming forward and defending you and your credibility?
NOT ONE SINGLE SUPPORTER Ms. Lynch, doesn’t that indicate that you are pretty much alone in this battle?
Susanne
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:12 am
Sydey, I am not full of excuses. I am merely addressing lies, slander, defamation, libel, and fraud. What excuse will I need when Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Treasury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Phi Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Dale Burgess, Cohen, and possibly others. You are really underestimating me if you think I won’t be in court to respond to Gianeli/Blogonaut’s garbage lies. Assume what you will. How can you speak for my parents or children? You have no idea who we are. Agent Wynar-FBI Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Dale Burgess are all in the Bay Area so it will be quite easy for them to make their way to court. We are living in an age when court’s are quite comfortable with telephonic hearings/trials.
I think they will come to court because they will have to answer a subpoena. They are going o testify in response to what is currently Gianelli-Blogonaut’s hearsay allegations. I could care less if Gianelli files a suit against me. In fact, I look foward to it. Every word he has spoken, written, communicated is a lie. His and your threats will not silence me.
You have it correct - everthing being said on the internet is going to be raised as an issue in a court of law. That includes your inssane Chapter 51 action. Who is going to force me into that position? Not Steven Clark Lindsey. He is already so far in over his head that one can safely assume he has no way out. He inserted himself into Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal and the Phil Spector st up and he is backed intoa corner.
If Agent Wynar actually said I am a classic 5150 candidate he should hire a personal attorney to represent him and he should be forced to undergo psychiatric evaluations. Perhaps an expert would like to explain how Wynar, a total stranger, drew his conclusions. I intend to find out why he is gossiping about me with parties who definitely seem to have motive to undermine me and what FBI policy permits him to slander me.
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:40 am
Walsh - let me address your lies. I am documenting them for the reasons Green noted above. They are going to be raised in court and they have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This may be impossible - given the fact that you, Green, Blogonaut, Gianelli, Blaine, and other cyber-terrorists do not know me or my family at al. I did not initiate the slander and lies about me on the internet. That honor goes to Leonard Cohen and Steven Clark Lindsey. I think it’s safe to say that Gianelli, Kory, and Belark have participated. I am not convinced you are not a criminal to me, Ms. Walsh. I have advised you that I believe you are a cult victim and an idiotic moron. I am, however, convinced that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, Gianelli, and Belark have engaged in criminal conduct including, but not limited to, obtruction of justice, witness tampering, witness inimidation, witness retaliation, coercion, blackmail, bribery, harassment, perjury, fraud, collusion, intentional torts, slander, cyber-terrorism, stalking, harassment, and some form of terrorism and - probably - much more. I happen to know for a fact that they are liars. I don’t know if they’re hysterical but if this isn’t a prank they should, at the very least, be concerned that serious-minded intelligent people are witnessing this insanity.
I don’t know that I’ve engaged in any “conversation” about the sanity o my Mother, sister, her husband, my son, Phil Spector, Janis Zavala Spector, or Steven Segal but now that you mention it - yes, I think they are sane. I can’t really address Ann Diamond’s sanity. I don’t know her personally but the article she wrote was highly readable and essentially factual. Her tales of Cohen targeting her, slandering her, and attempting to destroy her life, and what she thinks Cohen is capable of rang true. I have forwarded those emails to the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and - of course - Phil Spector’s legal team. It’s safe to say that Cohen - who has destroyed my life because I had the audacity to report his tax fraud that I was told is criminal, probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury (and makes an appearance in prosecution documents), and targeted my children and parents, is dangerous, unstable, and capable of anything.
Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche are inconceivably great teachers.
I have not and do not speak for others and have not “claimed” who knows what. That would be speculative and irrelevant in a court of law - unless you’re engaged in the Phil Spector matter where gossip and hearsay has somehow become fact
Why should people support me on the internet? People will come forward when I file my lawsuits. That will be when the attorney I am consulting decides. At that time - they will come forward to testify in the proper venue - a court of law. No. This does not indicate that I am alone in my battles. It indicates that I’m on the front line, taking the direct hits, and some cowards are hiding while other brave people are witnessing this deranged and malicious scenario. Your capital letters underscore nothing other than your stupidity.
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:57 am
Green, is this now a legal issue - how I sign my letters?
I have not instructed Phawker to do anything. I have emailed Phawker requesting that they maintain all IP address information relating to this Blog’s comments in connection with me, the Leonard Cohen Criminal Tax Fraud Matter, and the Phil Spector set up. I did not instruct them to “save” your IP address, Ms. Green. I did not specify names. How I handle a subpoena is not your business and all this talk about Gianelli’s garbage suit is tedious. He should file the lawsuit and put his money where his mouth is. I think we’ve addressed this point ad nauseum. I have no idea why you are talking about your lawyer but perhaps you have delusions of grandeur and believe you are relevant. You have no idea what the judge will or will not grant but your arrogance is coming across loud and clear. A judge and jury may wonder why a total stranger has inserted itself into this mater. My sister didn’t write Gianelli and/or me and I want to force the issue in court to prove that Gianelli, as usual, is lying.
I didn’t say I don’t want my family in the court room, did I? I have merely noted who I intend to subpoena. I’ll be sure to instruct “the feds” to have their hair done, dress nicely, and to be sure to bring snacks and iPods for the boring downtime.
I’ll note for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Google’s legal team that my Blogs and email accounts may targeted in the not too distant future. I have stolen from Blogonaut? How? I thought it was a Blog parading as Stephen Gianelli, an attorney. I have no idea what you are talking about with respect to Gianelli’s Blogonaut Blog. Is your legal position that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark’s “slander” about me and others is now a copyright issue? That’s fairly amusing and preposterous. Phawker can speak for itself. In the meantime, I will post your slanderous comments on my Blog and email them to the recipients on my public emails that document the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Yes, once a thief always a thief - that’s probably why Cohen stole from Marty Machat, Bob Johnston and me, defrauded the U.S. government, State of Kentucky, and others. That is not just my personal opinion. It is supported by evidence.
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Kelley Lynch says:
frombillpavelic@aim.com
toodzerchenma@gmail.com
dateThu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM
subjectRe: Moses Znaimer
mailed-byaim.com
hide details 1:27 PM (21 hours ago) Reply
PHIL SHOULD BE VERY APPRECIATIVE OF YOUR TENACIOUS WORK IN HIS MATTER. HIS PROLIFIC PERSONALITY, NO MATTER HOW TASTELESS TO SOME , SHOULD NOT BE USED AS A VEHICLE TO CONVICT AN INNOCENT MAN. I AM CONVINCED IF HE WAS NOT PHIL SPECTOR THIS CASE WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN FILED.
RESPECTFULLY,
BILL PAVELIC
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Sydney and Susanne, you are so right. Lynch is always the victim. However, her family doesn’t see her as a victim; in fact, they’re communicating with the “terrorists”. And never once has Lynch received any kind of support or encouragement from anyone. She’d have to post it on her blog. She can’t help herself. As a matter of fact, we know the only people she’s heard from are Bill Pavlic, Bill Frayeh, Gianelli, Alan Jackson, and Colleen Chenney—and each one has asked her to remove them from her mailing list. And as her past history indicates, she has or will become viscious toward each one. They, too, are now “thugs”. They’ve told her to stop spamming them. Whenever she does get a response she posts it—she can’t help herself. All we “insane thugs” need to see that others have responded to her (thus feeding her immense ego). In regards to an email she spammed to AC360, she received a standard response from the show—and ever since she’s deluded herself into thinking he believes and supports her and her lies. It’s time to be honest: Kelley Lynch and the truth are not accquainted—they don’t even reside on the same planet. Lynch has not a single supporter.
Now, we know how Lynch will respond to this: we don’t know what we’re talking about, yada yada yada.
At one time, Lynch insisted Boies Schiller told her she had at least a $20M claim against Cohen. Yeah, right. Sure they said that. Not even B/S could afford to walk away from that settlement. Now if B/S did truthfully tell Lynch of that claim, there must have been a string attached. Of course, B/S would require Lynch to be clean, sane, and sober. Yet, not even the prospect of $20M is enough for Lynch to get (and stay) clean, sane, and sober. Afterall, B/S would require daily drug tests and proof of psych treatment. Is it really any wonder that her family is doing nothing to help her?
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Ms. Lynch
You keep referring to me as a “Cohen cult victim fan”. It coming from you I assume it is meant to be an insult, well I don’t take it that way. I have also met some of the real hard core Cohen fans, and although I agree that some of them are a bit over the top in their love and admiration for Cohen and his work, they are all very kind, loving and intelligent people, but they are much too busy to plan (and make money) for their next trip somewhere in the world to see and hear their Idol, to have time and interest in writing and reading on blogs.
If you have any idea of where Esbjerg, Denmark is located, you will also know that the distance to Leonard Cohen’s homes in Los Angeles, Montreal, or Hydra is a bit too much for me “dropping by” for a casual chat with Leonard or Lorca. I do not need any of those tactics to show my support for Leonard Cohen.
You say that you are looking forward to your day in court with Cohen, Gianelli and others, well I am sure you will get your wish and you may very possible end up in jail, (NO it is NOT a threat, just common sense) and maybe that is your wish too, then you do not need to run from one homeless shelter to another.
Have you ever contemplated getting a job and supporting yourself?. Oh No, sorry, who will hire a pathalogical liar and thief on the verge of complete insanity?. I guess you will just have to keep on slandering people and hope for free room and board for a l o n g time.
Susanne
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Kelly Green, how would you know who I am or am not communicating with? You yourself have acknowledged that you are an absolute stranger. Your conduct confirms what I - and my Mother - believe: that this situation has exposed to unstable people. You know nothing about who I have heard from as a “fact” and you should research the definition of fact.
Colleen Chaney’s email is enclosed (below). It does not say that she wants me to remove her from my emails. She is addressing, in the attachment, very serious issues regarding tax fraud, mail faud, etc. and telling me to whom I address those issues with in Kentucky (ie., the Attorney General and Kentucky Revenue Cabinet).
I have not become vcious to any of these individuals and that includes Alan Jackson. I addressed, in writing, the fact that he was in contact with Gianelli-Blogonut and issues relating to Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s set up). Not one of them mentined spam or the fact that they believed I was spammng them. If you have evidence proving otherwise - post it here publicly.
I have never stated that I believe Anderson Cooper or AC360 supported me or my positions. I noted that Anderson Cooper asked Scott Rabb/Esquire if Phil Spector thought he was “framed” and thought that was an intelligent and astute question. Since the forensic science concludes that Clarkson shot herself it is also a question that investigators should be asking themselves. Anderson Cooper and/orAC 360 have never advised me that I have spammed them. Did they communicate this with you?
I am intimately acquainted with the truth. You, however, are a stranger who is lying abut me and my family (who absolutely support me and you cannot say otherwise) and your motives are suspect, sinister, and abnormal.
Boies Schiller said $15 million and that was before the destruction of my life and they didn’t have complete asset valuations. Boies Schiller represented Neal Greenberg so they weren’t given the oppotunity to walk away from the type of money I am owed - which is not a settlement. I wouldn’t use them in any event. Good point - I think they wanted me to protect Neal Greenberg who I believed help Cohen create his tax fraud. I don’t have drug or substance abuse issues and people making these allegations will never be able to prove this. How can you, a total stranger, make that allegation? You cannot.
Kelley Lynch
fromChaney, Colleen (SOS)
toKelley Lynch
dateThu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
subjectRE: State of Kentucky - Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
mailed-byky.gov
hide details Nov 12 (11 days ago)
Please see the attached response to your November 09, 2009 email. Please let me know if you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Colleen
Colleen B. Chaney
Director of Corporations and Legislative Programs
Office of Secretary of State Trey Grayson
The Capitol Building
700 Capital Ave., Suite 152
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3490 (office)
502-564-5687 (fax)
Letter regarding Traditional Holdings LLC.pdf
167K View Download
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:02 pm
— On Mon, 11/23/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: David Boies - Boies Schiller
To: dboies@bsfllp.com, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, anderson.cooper@cnn.com, colleen.chaney@ky.gov, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 7:08 PM
David Boies,
Why don’t you take a look at the insanity I am dealing with on the internet. You’re a lawyer. Why do you think total strangers want to have me committed and are calling me a drug addict? How do you think this makes my children feel? This is what Cohen’s tax fraud has exposed me to. Do you think Colleen Chaney asked me to remove her? You can read - see her email to me below.
I intend to subpoena you to to the stand and will ask you who, in the City of LA, you think - as I was told by Posel, will take the fall for what happened to me and why. Also why your firm emailed me to have Brian Bennett wire me when I went to meet with Robert Kory because I was being asked to participate in criminal activity at our luncheon. Your employee was privy to the details and assured me that recording Kory would not be a set up.
Kelley Lynch
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Kelly Green, how would you know who I am or am not communicating with? You yourself have acknowledged that you are an absolute stranger. Your conduct confirms what I - and my Mother - believe: that this situation has exposed to unstable people. You know nothing about who I have heard from as a “fact” and you should research the definition of fact.
Colleen Chaney’s email is enclosed (below). It does not say that she wants me to remove her from my emails. She is addressing, in the attachment, very serious issues regarding tax fraud, mail faud, etc. and telling me to whom I address those issues with in Kentucky (ie., the Attorney General and Kentucky Revenue Cabinet).
I have not become vcious to any of these individuals and that includes Alan Jackson. I addressed, in writing, the fact that he was in contact with Gianelli-Blogonut and issues relating to Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s set up). Not one of them mentined spam or the fact that they believed I was spammng them. If you have evidence proving otherwise - post it here publicly.
I have never stated that I believe Anderson Cooper or AC360 supported me or my positions. I noted that Anderson Cooper asked Scott Rabb/Esquire if Phil Spector thought he was “framed” and thought that was an intelligent and astute question. Since the forensic science concludes that Clarkson shot herself it is also a question that investigators should be asking themselves. Anderson Cooper and/orAC 360 have never advised me that I have spammed them. Did they communicate this with you?
I am intimately acquainted with the truth. You, however, are a stranger who is lying abut me and my family (who absolutely support me and you cannot say otherwise) and your motives are suspect, sinister, and abnormal.
Boies Schiller said $15 million and that was before the destruction of my life and they didn’t have complete asset valuations. Boies Schiller represented Neal Greenberg so they weren’t given the oppotunity to walk away from the type of money I am owed - which is not a settlement. I wouldn’t use them in any event. Good point - I think they wanted me to protect Neal Greenberg who I believed help Cohen create his tax fraud. I don’t have drug or substance abuse issues and people making these allegations will never be able to prove this. How can you, a total stranger, make that allegation? You cannot.
Kelley Lynch
fromChaney, Colleen (SOS)
toKelley Lynch
dateThu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
subjectRE: State of Kentucky - Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
mailed-byky.gov
hide details Nov 12 (11 days ago)
Please see the attached response to your November 09, 2009 email. Please let me know if you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Colleen
Colleen B. Chaney
Director of Corporations and Legislative Programs
Office of Secretary of State Trey Grayson
The Capitol Building
700 Capital Ave., Suite 152
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3490 (office)
502-564-5687 (fax)
Letter regarding Traditional Holdings LLC.pdf
167K View Download
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Actually, Walsh, it’s meant as a compliment. I wouldn’t want to insult polite company - if that exists on this Blog - with my actual thought about you and what is going on here. A bit over the top hardly begins to describe hard-core Cohen fans and, having worked as Cohen’s personal manager for approximtely 18 years, I think I’m in a better position than you to address that matter. I am not going to dscuss whether or not Cohen’s fans are kind and loving. That has nothing to do with the slander, lies and threats I am addressing on this Blog
What’s your point here, Walsh - that you are merely obsessed with me?
You think I’ll end up in jail, do you? I think Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Rice, Bergman, Gianelli, Belark, and others should end up in prison. You’re just stating that I should be in jail based on intuition, right? Not the evidence that I have sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury, the State of Kentucky, Phil Spector, and others. Just your intuition and the fact that you personally believe Cohen is a good person.
Good point. I’ve thought the same - that the slander and lies being publicly spewed on these sites affects my job possibilities. That is precisely what damages will address. Fortunately, intuition is not a viable legal defense and I have repeatedly corrected the lies, slander, etc. so no one is going to be able to say they relied on any lie in good faith. I have also pointed people, like the lawyer Stephen Gianelli and his reporter Joff Belark, to evidence I publicly filed against Cohen in Boulder with my Motion to Quash. Therefore, they are not going to have deniability as to the facts either.
Kelley Lynch
Have you ever contemplated getting a job and supporting yourself?. Oh No, sorry, who will hire a pathalogical liar and thief on the verge of complete insanity?. I guess you will just have to keep on slandering people and hope for free room and board for a l o n g time.
Susanne
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Actually, Walsh, it’s meant as a compliment. I wouldn’t want to insult polite company - if that exists on this Blog - with my actual thought about you and what is going on here. A bit over the top hardly begins to describe hard-core Cohen fans and, having worked as Cohen’s personal manager for approximtely 18 years, I think I’m in a better position than you to address that matter. I am not going to dscuss whether or not Cohen’s fans are kind and loving. That has nothing to do with the slander, lies and threats I am addressing on this Blog
What’s your point here, Walsh - that you are merely obsessed with me?
You think I’ll end up in jail, do you? I think Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Rice, Bergman, Gianelli, Belark, and others should end up in prison. You’re just stating that I should be in jail based on intuition, right? Not the evidence that I have sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury, the State of Kentucky, Phil Spector, and others. Just your intuition and the fact that you personally believe Cohen is a good person.
Good point. I’ve thought the same - that the slander and lies being publicly spewed on these sites affects my job possibilities. That is precisely what damages will address. Fortunately, intuition is not a viable legal defense and I have repeatedly corrected the lies, slander, etc. so no one is going to be able to say they relied on any lie in good faith. I have also pointed people, like the lawyer Stephen Gianelli and his reporter Joff Belark, to evidence I publicly filed against Cohen in Boulder with my Motion to Quash. Therefore, they are not going to have deniability as to the facts either. Beyond that, Cohen owes me millions and my children and parents would not be suffering economically if he had not stolen from me. Then there’s Ray’s alleged father: who should have repaid me rather than inserting himself into this matter as well. I discussed the custody matter with the Treasuy Agents and no one is going to be able to explain away Robert Kory’s Declaration in that so called custody matter. He did not know my son and it’s clear evidence of witness tampering with a minor.
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Kelley. No I am not obsessed with you, but I am intrigued with what make a person like you tick.
Yes, I agree that all this internet hoolabahloo probably have hurt your chances of getting employment, but I do not believe it is because of Cohen’s or Lindsey’s or others suits against you, I believe it is your own conducts and presentation of yourself on the internet that has destroyed your credibility and put a huge negative on your qualifications as a trusted employer, so maybe slandering and suing people will be the only career you will have from now on, I guess that is your own choise
Susanne
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Walsh, what is driving me right now is the fact that Cohen targeted my elderly parents and children. Any decent parent can and does understand this. The activity is continuing on the internet and the comments on this Blog are evidence of that. Gianelli-Blogonaut has threatened to sue Rutger who has done nothing but perceived Gianelli-Blogonaut’s remarks as a threat.
I disagree. Cohen basically released a press release and, if you read his intervew with Brian Johnson, clearly stated that he was not accusing me of theft. He also mentioned the tax hit.
Actually, I worked for Deneuve Construction who saw what was going on with the internet slander, asked me why I ever associated with people like Lindsey and Cohen, and determined I was the victim of filthy lawyering so clearly they didn’t find me untrustworthy but saw through the lies. The Southards, who I worked for, and who have known me since I was a teenager also saw through the situation and reviewed some of the evidence, had me speak to their attorneys, and understood - after listening to Ray’s abusive father - that he is not a man but a twisted person who plays mind-games with his son.
As I’ve stated, and you have not reviewed the evidence or witnessed what I and others have - I am telling the truth. You are merely gossiping, lying, and slandering me. What you believe is irrelevant to me. You will not be on a jury.
I realize that you’re intrigued. Obsessed also. Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive is more sinister - particularly as he was communicating with Cohen’s advisers, prosecutor Alan Jackson, and is a “lawyer” who as lied to the FBI and understands - all to well - concepts like slander. But, it’s a game - for him. For me - it’s deadly serious. The IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury can entertain themselves with men like Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, et al. who definitely thinks this is a “federal prank.”
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Walsh, just out of curiosity, you don’t hit the crack pipe, do you? Your illogical and irrational fascination with the destruction of my life and your creepy intuitions indicate some type of disorder. Also, the fact that you intuitively speak for United State federal agencies and Phil Spector’s legal team, without shame, is definitely worth noting.
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 5:35 pm
Walsh, since you’re so intrgued with Cohen’s Tax Fraud matter what do you have to say about this statement in Bian Johnson’s article. I had no idea this was the reason Cohen hired Greenberg - to “protect” him from an “upfront tax hit.” There are seious tax issues associated with this statement. What’s your intuition tell you - from an IRS standpoint? Can you legally avoid paying taxes by using scam entiities and deceving the IRS?
From the first sale, about $5 million was transferred to trusts that Greenberg had been enlisted to manage and that would protect Cohen from an upfront tax hit …
Greenberg is correct about this although I don’t know what “dangers” he is referring to. I know I gave the IRS evidence that Greenberg and Westin (in writing) felt that Cohen’s level of borrowing - from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” to the structure itself. Any comments on that? Let’s address the facts and evdence rather than the ruse slander, etc.
Would you like to expound on Cohen’s own statement - made to Brian Johnson and published - that he was not accusing me of theft? This is a very straightforward and crystal clear statement so I’m not certain how it has become twisted. As you know, I have been accused of theft on this Blog and yet Cohen himself publicly declared that he was not/is not accusing me of theft.
“I’m not accusing her of theft,” he says of Lynch.
I look forward to hearing your “insights” into why Cohen stated publicly that he is not accusing me of theft - particularly as you mentioned “jail.”
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 5:50 pm
The Greenberg remark is as follows. Let me know what “dangers” you think he’s talking about. Not only did Cohen sign off on Traditional Holdings, he named the entity, the documnts are notarized, and I asked for and received an Indemnity Agreement.
Greenberg alleges that Cohen, well aware of the structure and its dangers, signed off on it.
November 23rd, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Dear Psycho:
What you can’t seem to get in your head is that the binding effect of the CA $7.9 million theft judgment against you is that all claims that Cohen had, and that you had but failed to assert as a cross-complaint, that arise out of your former business relationship have been conclusively adjudicated.
That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.
You denying that Cohen was the victim of your wrongdoing is like OJ denying, in the face of the $40 million judgment to the contrary, that he killed his ex-wife.
It’s over, Psycho. You lost. Get over it.
Cohen landed on his feet and his career is bigger and better than ever.
You hit the skids, are homeless and are mentally disturbed, and psycho with nothing, because unlike Cohen and despite your extraordinary human potential even after 5 years you have been unable to pivot away from your adversity and move on to positive endeavors.
You are pathetic and mean spirited and we ALL wish you would just crawl into a hole and disappear, because you have nothing positive or constructive to offer–only negative, harmful energy.
I do feel sorry for your sons, sister, mother and other relatives whom you have publicly shamed by revealing your familial connection to them but not for you.
Everybody knows everyone on you email spam list laughs or cringes or both when their inbox starts filling up with your latest rants about Suzanne Walsh or Kelley Green or this blogger or that person. But they do not care about you and never will. You have become a caricature of your self.
Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.
Therefore, the biggest joke of all is that joke that you have played on yourself through your constant self-negitive publicity machine.
Likewise, who would want to hire a business manager or even an assistant with a history of turning just about everyone you get mad at (including a former employer) into the IRS and every law enforcment agency that will listen–not to mention an adjudicated thief and self deluded psycho.
November 23rd, 2009 at 9:44 pm
I see we’re dissembling.
There is no binding judgment. You cannot go into court, lie, commit perjury, and prevail. These are crimes and Cohen should obviously be prosecuted. You also cannot illegally make someone a partner on a corporation (LC Investments, LLC) and steal from people. I did not fail to assert a cross complaint. I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and believe his bogus lawsuit wih fraudulent financials attached is evidence of his attempts to obstruct justice and to cover up criminal conduct and criminal tax fraud. The lawsuit has nothing to do with the entities raised and I remain unconvinced that a California Court had jurisdiction I am also not convinced that Cohen is actually a resident - based on the fact that he abandoned a green card and obtained a new one after Marty Machat’s death although he has held himself out to be one. The attorneys I’ve spoken with disagree with your legal analysis and never once mentioned your lame attempt to turn Cohen’s garbage into a catch-all lawsuit.
Cohen told a reporter he was not accusing me of theft. Trust me - that matters. Are you speaking for the IRS again? How do you know that nothing I told the IRS will have any effect? What if the IRS prosecutes Cohen for criminal tax fraud and takes the position that I was used as an unwitting pawn and all Cohen’s activity - including his fraud in Boulder - are evidence of the lengths he’s gone to obstruct justice, witness tamper, and silence me? That’s a distinct possibility. Whether or not I asked that the fraudulent restraining order be made permanent does not address Cohen’s perjury in his Declaration.
I don’t think the OJ matter has any similarities to Cohen’s tax fraud - but Bill Pavelic has stated publicly that LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set up him, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden - in retaliation for the OJ trial so that’s quite heavy as it relates to Phil Spector.
I will continue to address all slander and lies.
Why? They know Cohen, know what he’s capable of, and believe I have been targeted by nuts an liars on the internet.
I think Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissoner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury, the FBI, and others (like Ron Burkle) should tesify to whether or not they think they’re on a “spam list and cring when their email boxes fill up.
Walsh and Green are certainly obsessive about someone they don’t know or care about. They don’t know me.
Well, I’m not about to start arguing whether the IRS and/or DOJ can prosecute Cohen and I know for a fact that you do not speak for them. If you are, however, an IRS or DOJ agent, please post your official position on this Blog using your oficial email address as evidence of your employment with these agencies. The IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI can decide if federal crimes have been committed. I happen to personally believe they have been committed and no one can covince me otherwise. Why would the IRS be laughed out of court? Whenever I talk to anyone they ask why Cohen isn’t in prison and believe Phil Spector was framed. If I am a potential prominent government witness then that would mean that there’s a “pending” matter, wouldn’t it?
I wasn’t Cohen’s business manager and Brian Johnsn was clear that I was Cohen’s personal manager. Cohen himself was clear about this and should review the Declaration he filed in District Court in the failed CAK bond deal that concerned Robert Kory.
I realize that turning a former partner into the IRS created problems for me and ths could and has affected my ability to work. Thank you for pointing this out. Cohen was not my employer and that is why I received 1099s every year. Why he refused to give me one for 2004 is unbeknownst to me but the IRS should investigate that and I view my commissions for that year as a gift due to his refusal to 1099 me as he had in the past.
Cohen himsef has said he was not accusing me of theft so let’s let his own words speak for themselves. To do otherwise is preposterous and sheer lunacy.
I see that you understand, all to well, that I am a highly credible witness - as many people have pointed out. In fact, what they are now pointing out is the fact tha Cohen so viciously targeted me, destroyed my life, and all he is left with is his evil mess. They feel this way about Phil Spector’s prosecutors also.
I will pass your posting onto the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI. I think detemining who has motive to slander and undermine my credibility with such a vengeance is a key issue.
Kelley Lynch
November 23rd, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Leonard Cohen to Brian Johnson re. Kelley Lynch
“I’m not accusing her of theft,” he says of Lynch.
November 23rd, 2009 at 9:48 pm
Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids. I know how upsetting that is to Cohen, Lindsey, the District Attorney, Alan Jackson, et al.
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
“Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids.” Huh?
Obviously, we have a different yard stick for rock bottom. (For me morphing into a homeless ranting nutcase would be the skids, especially if I formerly lived in a $3 million home with a pool in a nice part of Los Angeles, had two wonderful kids, was a business manager for a well known music figure, negotiated multi-million dollar deals, and made seven figures in a single year.
Perhaps I can put it in terms that you might understand: Compared to Leonard Cohen you are a dung beetle.
You have constructed quite a fantasy world for yourself Kelley.
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:39 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject:
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “doronweinberg” , “Dennis”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , billpavelic@aol.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 2:45 AM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Please review the posting below carefuly. Apparently “Kelly PLZ Face Reality” understands that I am a potental “prominent government witness.” I think it’s obvious that this is witness tampering and it’s a game. The game seems to be to have the IRS laughed out of Court. I think this is an unbelievably blatant posting and the person who posted it is ubelievably crass, arrogant, and aggressive. I have been exposed to highly suspect individuals since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS which, no doubt, jeopardizes my job possiblities because they are dead set on slandering me and undermining my credibiity and because potential employers probably would not like to hear that someone reported criminal tax fraud - or anything - to the IRS. This underscores my position that reporting tax fraud is dangerous - from many perspectives. They, of course, continue to speak for each of the federal agencies copied in here and for you, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan.
The OJ comment is interesting - particularly in light of Bll Pavelic’s allegations that he, Dr Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaiation for the OJ trial. Perhaps it was just Freudian.
In any event, I a concerned about my children being exposed to these maniacs - in particular, Rutger, who has been targeted already.
All the best,
Kelley
cc: Phil Spector
Kelly PLZ Face Reality Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Dear Psycho:
What you can’t seem to get in your head is that the binding effect of the CA $7.9 million theft judgment against you is that all claims that Cohen had, and that you had but failed to assert as a cross-complaint, that arise out of your former business relationship have been conclusively adjudicated.
That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.
You denying that Cohen was the victim of your wrongdoing is like OJ denying, in the face of the $40 million judgment to the contrary, that he killed his ex-wife.
It’s over, Psycho. You lost. Get over it.
Cohen landed on his feet and his career is bigger and better than ever.
You hit the skids, are homeless and are mentally disturbed, and psycho with nothing, because unlike Cohen and despite your extraordinary human potential even after 5 years you have been unable to pivot away from your adversity and move on to positive endeavors.
You are pathetic and mean spirited and we ALL wish you would just crawl into a hole and disappear, because you have nothing positive or constructive to offer–only negative, harmful energy.
I do feel sorry for your sons, sister, mother and other relatives whom you have publicly shamed by revealing your familial connection to them but not for you.
Everybody knows everyone on you email spam list laughs or cringes or both when their inbox starts filling up with your latest rants about Suzanne Walsh or Kelley Green or this blogger or that person. But they do not care about you and never will. You have become a caricature of your self.
Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.
Therefore, the biggest joke of all is that joke that you have played on yourself through your constant self-negitive publicity machine.
Likewise, who would want to hire a business manager or even an assistant with a history of turning just about everyone you get mad at (including a former employer) into the IRS and every law enforcment agency that will listen–not to mention an adjudicated thief and self deluded psycho.
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:31 pm
P.S. Robert Kory “himself,” the self-proclaimed “tax jock,” even wrote me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to matters going back many years. Perhaps Kelly PLZ Face Reality Says should speak to Kory personally. He can explain to “it” why he told me that there was fraud on every entity, the holding periods were illegal, and advised me that I had a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers. Of course, Mike Taitelman will have to testify to the fact that Kory personally told him that if I said/did what he/Cohen wanted they would say I was a pawn. Otherwise, they would say I orchestrated this insane mess. We’ll also have to find out what Cohen’s legal team and other advisers were doing. They didn’t appear to me to be rogues. I actually am about to review a tremendous amount of evidence that was in storage. I want to send the IRS Commisioner’s Staff the balance of paperwork - some of which they don’t have yet. It ould break my heart to see them laughed out of Court - particularly after Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Superfon, and others, have gone to such great lengths to silence me and destroy my life. I also want to get my hair done nicely - just in case the IRS calls its potential “prominent government witness.” Most people like the way I dress but I’ll probably need a few new outfits.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:23 am
Well, well, well…call me suprised. You’ve failed to post all the emails from those I listed. Without a doubt, Kelley, you’ve got the best “selective” memory around—and it won’t hold you in good stead with the courts.
Kelley, you’re the LAST person on earth who should be questioning whether others engage in intoxicating or illegal substances; afterall, you’re the one with a CRIMINAL HISTORY of substance abuse and associated violent crimes.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:55 am
Talk about selective reasoning:
“The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.” (posted by Kelly PLZ)
Do you honestly believe Kelly PLZ said or implied that you’d be a “prominent government witness”? You think that’s a compliment? A recognition for all you’ve suffered? If you truly believe you’ll be a prominent witness in any criminal case brought by the gov’t, then you’re really delusional. No one has anything to fear if you’re going to be the “prominent witness” against them.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:06 am
Just out of curiosity, Kelley, why didn’t your advisors report “Cohen’s taxfraudIwastoldwascriminal”?
Additionally, no one responding to your delusional and slanerdous postings is witness tampering or practicing witness intimidation. See, for us to be engaged in tampering and intimidation, we’d have to have a stake in the outcome. We don’t. No one in cyberspace is trying to silence you; however, you continue to bully us in hopes we’ll go away—how’s that working for you?
November 24th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Kelly Green, don’t hold your breath. I won’t be posting anything you’ve asked for and last I checked you were’t my King and I was not your subject - although I realize I am the subject of your obsesion and fixation.
I see that you really don’t know me. I have no history, whatsoever, of illegal substance abuse and I do not have a criiminal history. Just ran into some real rotten, corrupt cops and government officials who have no qualms - whatsoever -lying their asses off on the witness stand. I noticed that jurors happen to see rght through this … particularly when judges and other conflicted municipal employees (say in Boulder, Colorado) suppress facts and information from jurors who requested them.
I think I’ll be just fne in court. Fortunately, since you’re a stranger who does not know me you won’t be there. I also tend to doubt that the IRS, if there is a “pending matter” where I mght be a “prominent government witness” (who you and others are dead set on slandering), will be laughed out of Court. That being said, the same is not true for the people that I feel have “motive” to undermine my credibility. As I have stated ad nauseum , you cannot undermine people with lis.
Perhaps you are thinking of Leonard Cohen when talking about someone with a history of illegal substance abuse - which he has discussed in the press. And then there’s his abuse of prescription meth - and his carefully crafted and nauseating story to the pharmacologist that he wasn’t going to “knock over a gas station” to get meth. I don’t know if he has a violent history but Ann Diamond did send me some fascinating emails and did think Cohen had a history of aggression and was literally capable of “murder.” Please contact Ann Diamond directly for further details into the “man” Freda Guttman told her molested his daughter - according to his daughter.
Please keep in mind that you cannot simply lie about people and slander me publcly by stating that I have “a criminal history of substance abuse associated with violent crimes” when I do not. But, I realize this is a game and I am well aware that people posting here are convinced that the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI ae engaged in a federal prank I know someone who is not engaged in a federal or state prank. That is Phil Spector who witnessed a woman shoot herself at his house and is now sitting in prison because, according to Phillip, Steve Cooley has to flee the jurisdiction for Sacramento. Somehow I am not convinced that he will meet his goals but I realize that people - including the feds - should be very careful with Steve Cooley and his gang of merry thugs. In fact, Im praying for the DEA - I wouldn’t want to read that (like Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden) LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set them up also. With this “Hollywood” crowd anything could happen.
For the record, I now think you have crossed the proverbial line and should begin gathering evidence and witnesses to support your position that I have a substance abuse and/or criminal history. That needs to be proven. And, that will happen when hell freezes over. I will, however, bring this to the attention of the Department of Justice because Boulder PD is all over this story and their activities need to be investigated. People frequenty call for investigations but most people -unlike Gianelli - do not lie to the FBI or attempt to coerce me into what would probably have been an illegal deal with Cohen. That’s his idea of “helping” me. I know - I see right through him.
Kelley Lynch
A Stranger to Kelly Green
November 24th, 2009 at 1:31 am
To “Kelley PLZ Face Reality” - I bow to your superior knowledge and understanding of this psycho. I try to be optimistic about people, but this Kelley Lynch person has presented herself as someone who is truly evil. She is so consumed by hate that she is no longer a person who becomes evil but she is now only evil through and through. The person she once may have been no longer exists.
And Kelley, you can say anything you want about anyone; just understand that in doing so, you leave yourself wide open to repercussions. And by the way, what happened to the letter from Colleen Chaney from Kentucky? All you did was post her address. Are we supposed to believe that because you posted her address that she actually wrote to you and supported (read abetted) your cyber terrorism? You named your blog appropriately because you truly a cyber terrorist. I eagerly await your court hearings when you attempt to defend yourself against a lawsuit; I also eagerly await that one fine day when you get all your self-perceived enemies in criminal court to answer your so-called charges against them. It will be quite entertaining to watch you self-destruct either by actually opening your mouth and speaking, or when you oh-so-predictably don’t show up. Your entertainment value is diminishing. Get a job, get a new hobby and then get a life. The one you think you’re living died years ago.
Oh, and I’m not threatening you - I’m just telling you the truth.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:36 am
Kelly Green, how do you know te IRS would be laughed out of court in “any case premised in any way” on my “testimony” where I was figured as a “prominent government witness.” Perhaps the IRS would like to weigh in on your comments. And, I might point out that while you are slandering me and attempting to undermine me as a potential witness (with the full knowledge and awareness that I may be a “prominent government witness”) you have stated that you do not know me and I am a stranger to you. Therefore, your motive is more than suspect.
Yes, I honestly believe that Kelly PLZ not only implied but understands that I may e a “prominent government witness” in a pending matter. No, I don’t think that’s a compliment. I think it’s a statement of fact. Actually, let’s stick to what was said - here it is verbatim:
‘Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness. ”
This is written in plain English and what it says is that Cohen cannot be prosecuted using my testimony because people are dead set on undermining my credibility as “prominent government witness.” I have not filed one false complaint with anyone and repeat - evey word I have uttered/written is the truth and backed up by evidence I’ve sent to the IRS and others. Furthermore, it clearly states that the IRS will be laughed out of court on any case premised in any way on my testimony which goes to “motive.” If no one has anything to fear if I was going to be a “prominent witness against them” why would they go to such lengths to lie about me, slander me, and witness tamper? Someone (or many someones) apparently view me as a credible witness and a viable threat in any pending criminal prosecution. That’s clear as a bell to me.
Dale Burgess, my former accountant, asked me to convey to the IRS and Treasury - on his behalf (immediately following my meeting with the Treasury Agents) that he would testify to the fact that Cohen offered me 50% community property and my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud. Dale Burgess also felt that Criminal Intelligence of the IRS should be involved here or was involved here. Furthermore, he advised me that once I took the allegations to a field office (like Agent Tejeda’s) it would take time. Since he was an IRS Agent Iwill assume he knows what he is doing.
You and others seem to be responding plenty. In fact, you don’t seem to be able to control yourselves and I now believe you and others on this Blog are acting recklessly and making huge mistakes and admissions. You have witnessed nothing. I do not know you and you have acknowledged that so don’t insult my intelligence with your nonsensical statements and rants.
That’s a fascinating sentiment: “For us t be engaged in tampering and intimidation, we’d have to have a stake in the outcome.” I am unconvinced of that legal position and no one on earth would go to the trouble of lying about someone they admit is a stranger or slandering them for no reason whatsoever.
It is also entirely possible that you and others posting on this Blog have “a stake in the outcome.” That is far more plausible.
Actually, let’s not get insane. You and others have followed me around the internet and Michelle Blaine herself thanked Blogonaut for also targeting me, my Blogs, and emails.
It’s not working for me at all but perhaps the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan are buying it.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 1:47 am
Sydney, do you mean the superior knowledge that caused Kelly PLZ Face Reality to confirm that I am potentially a “prominent government witness” and the goal here is to undermine the IRS? I’m not convinced that’s actually superior knowledge and understanding but it may be criminal. The IRS would know for certain.
I understand your threats that if I speak, Sydney, you and others will continue to lie, slander me, and attempt to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent government witness.” So, I’m clear about the repercussions.
I posted Colleen Chaney’s email. I followed her instructions and contacted the Attorney General of Kentucky and the Revenue Cabinet regarding the various issues. Believe whatever you want about Colleen Chaney’s email to me who did write to me and sent an attachment.
Leonard Cohen and his lawyers - and Gianelli, no doubt - assume I won’t show up. They are dead wrong. From here on out, I will show up anywhere they file anything. I just didn’t participate in Cohen’s garbage lawsuit that I view as an attempt to obstruct justice or Neal Greenberg’s companion suit that I believe proves collusion. In other words, people shouldn’t be foolish enough to assume that I won’t appear in Court. I will.
Thank goodness my former life that included Cohen and Lindsey died. I was tired being surrounded by lying con artists. I have a life and a very very interesting witness sitting right here with me who knows me - and all the parties involved here (for the most part) exceedingly well. He’s not fooled by this either and doesn’t think I’m engaged in a federal prank. He, Yongzin Rinpoche, and others think people are attempting to scare and intimidate me. That is not going to happen and they are not going to undermine me with lies. Perhaps Cohen (and others) should get a real attorney now.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 2:03 am
Here you go Sydney. Why don’t you read Colleen Chaney’s email to me again. Sorry I can’t post the attachment which gave me instructons on who to contact with respect to my various questions. That would be the Attorney General of Kentucky and the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet. Colleen Chaney’s contact information is enclosed. Feel free to write her since you’ve inserted yourself into this matter.
Kelley Lynch
fromChaney, Colleen (SOS)
toKelley Lynch
dateThu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
subjectRE: State of Kentucky - Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
mailed-byky.gov
hide details Nov 12 (11 days ago)
Please see the attached response to your November 09, 2009 email. Please let me know if you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Colleen
Colleen B. Chaney
Director of Corporations and Legislative Programs
Office of Secretary of State Trey Grayson
The Capitol Building
700 Capital Ave., Suite 152
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3490 (office)
502-564-5687 (fax)
Letter regarding Traditional Holdings LLC.pdf
167K View Download
November 24th, 2009 at 2:12 am
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Boooooring. Same words every post, every day, every blog site. Not a trace of truth or sanity among them. Time to retire Kelley. You’ve lost your edge. Your attempt to twist the words of one poster into something s/he did not say is just more of the same old BS you’ve been posting for years. If you don’t want people responding to your postings, then stay off the internet. Take care of your private business the old fashioned way - privately. You have shown yourself to be the most useless piece of flesh imaginable and your overabundance of evil puts you on a fast track to hell. Perhaps you can join up with OJ and rehash how victimized you are. I’m sure he’ll be a sympathetic listener.
November 24th, 2009 at 2:17 am
Kelley, all she’s saying is that she attached a response to your November 9, 2009. What the hell is that supposed to prove? You are such a liar and a POS. Hope God forgives you Kelley Lynch because I doubt anyone in this life will. You are a pathetic liar, fraud, cheat, thief, manipulator and viciously evil person. What an absolute loser you are.
November 24th, 2009 at 2:50 am
Sydney, I would hate to twist the words of one poster so let me just post them again here:
‘Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness. ”
I am aware that you are attempting to silence me hence statements like “If you don’t want people responding to your postings, then stay off the internet.” The response is - no, I will not stay off the internet. Whenever and wherever I find malicious lies and calculated slander I will respond, correct the lies and slander, and state the truth. This is a very straightforward concept. There is nothing private about criminal tax fraud or a murder trial set up.
The OJ remarks are gratuitous. Every time OJ is raised I think of Bill Pavelic’s allegations that LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set up him, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden in retaliation for the OJ trial. Leonard Cohen was not murdered and is not dead in any event so your remarks about OJ are over the top and irrational.
I know what Colleen Chaney’s saying. She responded to my letter. I can’t follow your line of reasoning. How does Colleen Chaney’s letter to me end up with your telling me that you hope God forgives me. I am not a pathetic liar, fraud, cheat, thief, manipulator and viciously evil person but I realize I am a viable threat and credible witness.
Let’s end with a quote of Leonard Cohen’s. Why not let the master’s words speak for themselves. They speak volumes - particularly when taken in the context of the massive tax hit he was attempting to avoid. He probably could have avoided the penalties and interest if his disdain for ordinary income taxes wasn’t unprecedented from what I witnessed.
Kelley Lynch
“I’m not accusing her of theft,” he says of Lynch.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:01 am
Kelley, those with mug shots have a criminal history!
November 24th, 2009 at 3:02 am
P.S. The OJ comments make me think of Donna Cllarkson. I know she wants what OJ was forced to pay. Unfortunately, the forensic science proved - in this matter - that Lana Clarkson shot herself. Sydney, you seem so vicious and angry. Are you seeing a therapist? Calling a perfect stranger a piece of shit and having such an obvious interest in a perfect stranger. Leonard Cohen himself has stated publicly that he was not accusing me of theft. Are you attempting to threaten me with something Leonard Cohen himself has made quite clear is not an issue. His theft of my intellectual property is, however, a very serious issue. I’ve emailed Phawker that they should not destroy IP address information - particularly now that it’s clear that you are all “tampering” with a potential “prominent government witness” and attempting to undermine a possibly pending IRS prosecution which I would assume is criminal.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 3:04 am
Saw that one coming Ms. Green and, therefore, reminded the Department of Justice that Boulder PD needs to be investigated. The FBI in Denver understood that something was criminal connected with Officer Storbeck coming into Deneuve Construction after my conversation with Officer Garrin of LAPD - after all, why would they send me to the Boulder District Attorney and the Attorney General of Colorado? Who released the “mug shot” also needs to be investigated particularly as it was part of Joff Belark’s slanderous lie disguised as an article after he targeted me. I copied the IRS Commissioner’s Staff on his initial contacts with me - as well as others. Anything else you want to rehash?
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 3:09 am
You’re not going to ever prosecute anyone in a criminal court. As big as your ego is and as deluded as you are, nothing will change that. You can huff, and puff, and try to blow down a courthouse, but no prosecuter will ever take you seriously. The best you can ever hope for is a civil trial—and during a civil trial the jury will laugh at you. Don’t you get it—no judge is ever going to allow you the opportunity to persue any type of trial. WTH, show up at a courthouse, demand to see a judge or prosecuter–in minutes you’ll be ordered held for a 5150 hearing.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:14 am
Are you asking us to believe the cops have your low-jacked? That cops have nothing better to do so they might as well find where Kelley is so they can bust/harrass somebody?
November 24th, 2009 at 3:24 am
First, mug shots are part of a criminals record and those are considered open records—meaning if someone asks for them, the cops MUST provide them.
Second, I have never said and I will never say that the gov’t considers you a prominent witness—that’s your fantasy: not actuality.
Finally, you really want us to believe the Browne family and the Clarkson family want money. NO, they want their daughters back. Thanks to your good friend Phil Spector (who even you acknowledge you met only a few times) that will never happen. Just out of curiosity, if Drs. Lee and Baden were so crucial to Spector’s case, why didn’t they testify during the 2nd trial?
November 24th, 2009 at 3:24 am
There are no cops here with us - are there Ms. Green? The Boulder issue is behind us and it was a misdemeanor that needs to be investigated. That’s when I’ll call my witness - the owner of Juanita’s. After all, his manager stated - for the record - in a court of law that Boulder PD did not want me in Juanita’s. Apparently Boulder PD didn’t have all that much to do since they inserted themselves into Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud matter and the Phil Spector murder trial. I also did notice, and it is on my Blog presently, that Gianelli-Blogonaut “urged” LAPD and Boulder PD to target me and Joff Belark attempted to do something with Boulder PD when he sent Rutger’s email to them.
That’s right Green, I’m not a U.S. Prosecutor and I’m not going to prosecute anyone in a criminal court. But it is entirely possible, and you are well aware of this as are the other posters here (in particular the one that stated I am conceivably a “prominent government witness”), that the IRS is going to prosecute Leonard Cohen for his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. The only people that think this is a federal prank are the same people who are shamelessly attempting to undermine my credibility and who are lying about me and slandering me. The jury in Boulder wasn’t laughing and I believe they understood what had happened to a great extent which is precisely why they asked when the “trespassing” charges were brought - eight months after I witnessed a man with his penis out in front of a child and attempted to find a police officer. And, after the initial hearing in the matter that the City Attorney’s office miscommunicated with me about and told me someone would return my call to reschedule the hearing. That’s one hell of a miscommunication, isn’t it?
Do you speak for everyone - including all judges? I doubt it.
Gratuitous banter. I see everyone freaked out after the potential “prominent government witness” tampering was confirmed and cannot be retracted and has absolutely been emailed to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. They all understood that I knew Boulder PD was going to be raised as an issue tonight well in advance of that happening. That’s because I see right through you. I know this pisses you off but it’s the truth. And now you sound like morons attempting to forget what is posted above but I captured that and the entire content of this Blog and will continue to do so. After all, I’m documenting the destruction of my life, slander, etc., that arose solely due to the fact that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud and was dragged into the Phil Spector insanity.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 9:08 am
Yes, Ms. Lynch I am aware that Leonard Cohen stated that “he did not accuse you of theft” he also stated that because of concern and loyalty towards you and your family, he initially did not want to sue you, that he could live without the money, he justed wanted to see the books and know where the money had gone. I believe he is still waiting for that. He also said he was hurt and disappointed in you, but bore no ill feelings towards you. He did make a comment once, to a reporter, that he and you had a “brief sexual relationship 20 years ago” (the reporter used the word “lovers” Cohen did not), but with that one exception he has never publically spoken of your sex-life, as he has never spoken of your alcohol/drug use or your mental or emotional state, he has never attackt your character or accused you of ,or insinuated, that you were a bad or abuse parent, he has never spoken of you, your children or your parents in a derogatory or defamatory way.
All this speaks in Leonard Cohen’s favor, not in yours Ms. Lynch.
Again-again and again, your life was NOT destroyed, your job options were not reduced and you did not get harassed and slandered “solely because of the facts that you reported Cohen’s tax fraud” or got involved with the Phil Spector case. You have destroyed your own, your children’s and possible your parents lives, first by your dishonesty (call it theft or any other word) later and perhaps more important with your very public exposure of your private life, your hate and your relentless slander of various people.
Susanne
November 24th, 2009 at 12:06 pm
Colleen Chaney did not “respond” to Kelley Lynch’s email–except to blow her off.
See this KL email to Chaney agreeing to drop Chaney from KL’s spam email list:
“On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Chaney, Colleen (SOS) to me Hello Colleen, Thank you for the attached which I am sharing with Mr. Weinberg, Mr. Riordan, the IRS, DOJ, Agent Sopko and others. I now understand why Leonard Cohen, Richard Westin, Neal Greenberg, and others, felt comfortable committing what I was told is criminal tax fraud and setting up sham entities, etc. On the fact of it, from my perspective, it looks as though many people should be in prison. I’ll remove you from my emails. Someone in Kentucky is going to come up with answers. I don’t intend to spend the rest of my life contacting federael and state agencies. I’m beginning to wonder why we actually have them. Thank you,Kelley Lynch”
Kelley, your nose is growing, again.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
“Kelly Green, how do you know te IRS would be laughed out of court in “any case premised in any way” on my “testimony” where I was figured as a “prominent government witness.”
Ms. Lynch:
It is common sense, which is something you quite obviously lack.
>How many people do you know (other than you) that have reported hundreds of others to the IRS, Justice Department, and others, based on their blog comments?
>How many people do you know (other than you) that CC the IRS and a hundred others when they email their sister or son?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that send as many as 14 emails A DAY to the IRS, and have sent the IRS several THOUSAND emails in the last seversal years?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that write several emails a day for over a year to the same two high profile attorneys who they have never met or talked to, and who do not reply?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that have a $9 million dollar judgment and two harassment restraining orders against them or have been taken against their will to a psychiatric facility?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that share ALL of the above attributes?
Does any of this behavior seem remotely normal to you?
No wonder you fancy yourself to be a credible witness. In your world up is down and down is up.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Gianelli/Blogonaut,
Rather than harass me why don’t you file a lawsuit and handle this in the proper venue. Following me around the internet, slandering me, offering to communicate with Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers on my behalf, lying to Agent Wynar/FBI, and making a joke out of the IRS matter (that I believe is probably real) is what I believe needs to be investigated. No stranger would have Joff Belark target me, post lies and slander about me on the internet, target my son and attempt to intimidate him, and go to these lengths for no reason whatsoever. Furthermore, your contacts with Alan Jackson need to be explored and the fact that you called Investigator William Frayeh - on the Phil Spector matter - is clearly a serious issue. I can assure you that Phil Spector does not view that as frivolous or superfluous activity. He is, after all, in prison and there is evidence that Lana Clarkson shot herself.
Trust me - I don’t lack common sense but the fact that someone posted on this Blog last night that I may be a prominent government witness and the IRS will be laughed out of court is a very very egregious matter. In other words, it basically proves witness tampering.
I have no idea who has reported anyone to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury. Write them directly and ask. I have not reported hundreds of people to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury. Be clear about that. I reported Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, law enforcement and government misconduct, and have asked that certain parties - such as yourself - be investigated because I believe your goal is to undermine my credibility as a potential witness. I have stated this ad nauseum.
Since you are a complete stranger to me I don’t you are in a position to command me to answer anything. Write the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and/or Treasury and ask them how many people copy them in on emails documenting the destruction of their lives - for reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into the Phil Spector murder trial that appears to be a set up. You like to quote Bill Pavelic. Therefore, you must believe he is credible. Bill Pavelic has alleged that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery Homicide Unit in retaliation for the OJ trial. That is an incredibly heavy scenario.
The IRS can determine what they think about my emails. You do not work for the IRS; you do not speak for the IRS; you do not know what the IRS is or is not doing with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud; but you are all over Leonard Cohen’s story and have contacted or been contacted by his advisers. In any event, your are not the IRS and what I am doing with the IRS is none of your business although you certainly seem to have inserted yourself into this situation for reasons that are beyond my ability to understand - including having Joff Belark target me and write a long lie disguised as an article. You have also asked LAPD and Boulder PD to target me and your “reporter,” Joff Belark, sent my son’s email (dictated by Douglas Penick) in response to your intimidation tactics with him to the Boulder Police Department. What parent wouldn’t take that type of activity seriously? Do you want to explain that to me? I do see that you are unbelievably focused on my communications with the IRS who I don’t think will be laughed out of court. I have directed you and your reporter, Joff Belark, to credible evidence filed against Leonard Cohen with my Motion to Quash his garbage attempt to silence me after Ann Diamond posted her draft article for Rolling Stone about me on the internet. Ms. Diamond’s allegations that Cohen molested his daughter (according to Freda Guttman) seemed to inform his fraudulent restraining order and activity that crossed state borders.
What is this - a survey? File your complaint. This is frivolous. It harassment. And, I am convinced you are witness tampering and attempting to obstruct justice, etc. No one can ever convince me otherwise.
I may not have met Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan but I can assure you that i know Phil Spector. These are his attorneys. I was dragged into his matter and told, by a District Attorney investigator, that I was probably a witness. What high profile attorney would take that lightly? None. How would you know if they communicate with me? You don’t know me and apparently don’t know them - even one of them has waved to you.
I have a judgment against me because Cohen could not force me into an illegal deal - including an offer of 50% community property presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers. Robert Kory himself confirmed that there is fraud on every entity, the holding periods are illegal, and I have a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers. Cohen himself advised Brian Johnson, a reporter, that he was not accusing me of theft. He was, however, concerned about the massive tax hit. I think you can read - although I realize you like to ignore the facts. With respect to the psychiatric unit, this story scares ordinary individuals. I was dragged to King Drew, questioned about Phil Spector, and the entire file was falsified. Investigator John Thompson/District Attorney’s Office did not seem to take this story as a frivolous matter. Nor did he seem to think the presence of Inglewood PD at my home, the day SWAT descended, was a frivolous matter. There is evidence with Neal Greenberg and/or his lawyers, in Boulder, Colorado, that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested. As coincidence would have it, a custody matter was coordinated while I was at King Drew and Leonard Cohen’s lawyer and Betsy Superfon filed Declarations. Of course, Kory doesn’t know my son but my son “witnessed” a conversation between me and about Cohen’s tax fraud, the state tax returns that were missing, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. That is witness tampering, from my perspective, and the custody matter appears to be an attempt to obstruct justice and coerce or crush me into an illegal deal with Cohen. Intelligent human beings believe the FBI should investigate the King Drew matter. You can think whatever you like. You can also lie to Agent Wynar/FBI and quote him until the cows come home. Until Agent Wynar takes the witness stand and testifies under oath I’m not interested in hearsay. I would assume there are recordings of your conversations with him. Go into Court, file your complaint, stop harassing me and attempting to undermine my credibility, and I will - in turn - subpoena Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Treasury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Phil Spector, and Cohen. I can assure you that I will appear in court. I did not file an appearance in Cohen’s matter because I was not served the lawsuit, discussed this with Edelman and Kory, and the entire matter is fraudulent. I was not and never will be a trustee - constructive or otherwise. Please refer to the indexes of the corporate books and records with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and LC Investments, LLC that are filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder. You will also note that I was not a partner on LC Investments, LLC and, therefore, it is my firm position that Leonard Cohen himself issued illegal K1s to me.
The fraudulent restraining orders were meant to silence me. Period. They are garbage and that is precisely why I told Sergeant Fernandez to throw Cohen’s in the trash and asked him if everyone in the State of California was assisting Cohen with his tax fraud.
Actually, what doesn’t seem normal to me is to have people like you, Belark, Blaine, Sprocket, Sydney, Kelly Green, Susanne Walsh and others, utterly fixated on me - an absolute stranger - and playing games with a situation that includes major federal agencies. You have mentioned the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury many many times. Is your position that they are engaged in a federal prank here? Why don’t you address that issue? I reported tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I provided the IRS with a tremendous amount of evidence via email. I provided the iRS with my email passwords so they could review all emails between me, Cohen, his advisers, and others in order to make an independent determination as to what happened. Other people feel that the IRS is going to prosecute Leonard Cohen and there is a pending matter. They believe I am a potential witness for the government. They are wondering why Leonard Cohen isn’t in prison. Meanwhile, you have decided to target me and play games with me. You have also threatened my sister, her husband, and my son. I have noted this for the federal agencies and Phil Spector’s legal team who are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS, State of Kentucky, and others, and being dragged into the Phil Spector murder trial that does indeed seem to be a set up.
Let’s revisit what was posted here last night. Who said I was a potential prominent government witness and stated that the IRS would be laughed out of court?
Posted by Kelley PLZ:
“Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”
I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people - including you - understand that I am. That explains your motive in targeting me, lying about, slandering me, attempting to intimidate me, threatening me and my family, and so forth and so on. I continue to maintain that the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team should investigate your role here and subpoena all communications between you, the District of Los Angeles of Los Angeles and/or Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers, and others.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
“I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people - including you - understand that I am.”
Uh, actually no we do not. We were conveying exactly the opposite understanding.
Any pathology that would allow you to read our above post and come away with that conclusion is truly amazing.
As we said, in your mind, up is down and down is up.
Now if you will excuse us, we are late for a meeting with our other co-conspirators Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:25 pm
Kelley, it’s time to put up or shut up. Your tiresome bad-mouthing, accusations, threats, libel, slander and unbelievably perverse distortions of the truth are getting you nowhere except perhaps another trip to a psych hospital. You have zero credibility, zero proof of anyones’ misconduct, zero legal counsel, zero support from anyone, and that is never going to change. No matter how you distort what others say to and about you, you can’t make it anything but the truth. Here’s the deal - either file your bogus lawsuit, or shut the hell up. I believe you are in your mid-fifties, Kelley Lynch; and while that is a bit early for senile dementia and/or Alzheimer’s to set in, it is sounding more and more that you are afflicted with one and/or the other. Even the criminally insane follow a certain path of logic. You do not. Not now, not ever. Not in the past and certainly not in the future unless you get some serious help. God help your children and your mother, because it is well past the time when He could help you.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Green, who cares about the photograph? It is none of your business and I can assure you that I will and have addressed Boulder PD. It proves nothing whatsoever re. Leonard Cohen because I reported his tax fraud well in advance of being targeted by certain individuals.
Let’s look at the posting from last night. It’s on this Blog and anyone can read it and determine who posted it.
“Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”
I have no idea who the Browne family is but read that Donna Clarkson wants the same amount that OJ paid the Goldman family. Their daughter should not have been abusing drugs and drinking and she should not have shot herself. This is what the forensic science concluded. I have never said I only met Phil Spector a few times. I have known Phillip since I was 24 approximately. I am now 52. I worked for Phil Spector. I spent a great deal of time with Phil Spector. I know Janis Zavala Spector. She is also my friend. I know Phillip’s children - including Phillip, Jr. who died at the age of 11. Your interest in me - a perfect stranger - and Phil Spector is utterly fascinating and probably not a coincidence. The Clarkson family should sit down with Dr. Lee, Dr. Baden, Dr. Spitz, Dr. Pex, and Dr. DeMaio in an attempt to understand that their daughter shot herself and an innocent man is in prison. Attempting to take Mr. Spector’s liberties from him and his assets. Who knpws why Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden didn’t testify? Maybe it relates to Bill Pavelic’s extremely public allegations that they were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit. Your buddy, Blogonaut-Gianelli, quotes Bill Pavelic so apparently thinks he’s credible.
http://guiltyofincompetence.com/lapd-hunt-for-dr-henry-lee-dr-michael-baden-b-pavelic-t99.html
I think the attempts to glamorize Lana Clarkson, who mixed vicodin and alcohol, is dangerous. I have asked the DEA to investigate her death and Diane Ogden’s death. They have investigated other high profile matters such as Anna Nicole Smith’s death, Heath Ledger’s death, and Michael Jackson’s death. Since an innocent man is sitting in prison who witnessed a woman shot herself at his house one would think this is a serious matter for the DEA others particularly since prescription drug abuse if out of control in the United States. I have witnessed the affects of drugs like methadone, vicodin, fentanyl, etc. on people and it turns them into monsters. They do not know what they are doing at times and it is dangerous to both themselves and others. Period. Why the District Attorney has attempted to glamorize Clarkson is beyond my ability to comprehend. I also believe Baby Doll Gibson should explain why she went into Court in an attempt to testify that Clarkson was a prostitute who played with guns. Clearly that is relevant in this matter. Attempting to turn a suicide into a homicide is very dangerous business. There are teenagers that pay attention to what is going on in Hollywood. These drugs are glamorized and this lifestyle is glamorized. I am a Mother and find that conduct unconscionable. Please see Dr. Lee’s email to the LA Times. There apparently was no fingernail - which isn’t all that hard to figure out. What’s hard to figure out is why so many people and agencies are involved in the set up of Phil Spector and why you and others are dead set on undermining my credibility. It has been clearly stated on this Blog that I am potentially a potential “prominent government witness.” I do not believe, for a moment, that the IRS would be laughed out of court in any pending Leonard Cohen tax prosecution. I think jurors would understand that I am being targeted by cyber-terrorists who have motive to slander and trash me - including, but not limited to, Stephen Gianelli, Blogonaut, Joff Belark, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket (who I was told is the mouthpiece for Donna Clarkson), and others. Gianelli/Blogonaut has communicated with Cohen and/or his advisers; lied to Agent Wynar of the FBI; communicated with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson; contacted Invesetigator William Frayeh (an investigator on the Phil Spector matter) and is extremely interested in the IRS. That’s why I believe he phoned Agent Wynar and lied with him to begin with. I am convinced it was an attempt, as was his email to Agent Sopko/Treasury Department, to determine what they have pending with respect to Leonard Cohen. Please keep in mind that Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector in his grand jury. If that was the case, and I believe it probably was, I am convinced that Cohen perjured himself. I, after all, met the detectives who visited Cohen about Phil Spector. At that time, Cohen confirmed for them that his comments about Phil Spector - over the years to the news media - were good rock ‘n roll comments. The detectives were apparently surprised that his comments were 30 years old. Cohen does absolutely make an appearance in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine so one can safely assume that this is not a game. It’s certainly not a game for Phil Spector.
How do you know what the Clarkson family wants? Do you know them? You don’t know me and have stated that - publicly - for the record.
“Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”
I have also asked Immigration to investigate why Leonard Cohen abandoned his green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988; why he would obtain a new green card in 1991; and, why DeSouza has not been deported. I have also asked if the District Attorney’s attempts to keep DeSouza in the country can be construed as “witness tampering.”
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
“I have also asked Immigration to investigate why Leonard Cohen abandoned his green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988; why he would obtain a new green card in 1991; and, why DeSouza has not been deported. I have also asked if the District Attorney’s attempts to keep DeSouza in the country can be construed as “witness tampering.””
And you wonder why others think you not credible?
Oh, we forgot. Everyone except for posters on THIS blog thinks you are completely credible. The involuntary psychiatric commitments (plural), the $9 million judgment, the two civil harassment restraining orders, your daily emails to the IRS–all normal signs of a credible witness.
Prosecutions by the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury and Justice Department expected ANY MOMENT!
November 24th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Text of statement from Dr Henry Lee:
Dr. Henry Lee is currently traveling abroad on a lecture tour in Italy. He has made the following statement regarding the recent slanderous and incorrect news reports of him removing and withholding evidence related to the Spector case. “1. Numerous police officers, detectives, crime scene investigators and forensic scientists from The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and L.A. Coroner’s Office conducted detailed searches of a small area in the foyer of Mr. Spector’s house on February 3rd and 4th, 2003, for about 38 hours. It is impossible for that large of a group to have missed a fingernail or a tooth. Dr. Michael Baden and I arrived at Mr. Spector’s house at approximately 9:00 pm on February 4, 2003, after the police had left and released the scene. 2. One prosecution witness, a former L.A. detective, accused me of finding a red-colored fingernail and putting that nail in my handkerchief. A second witness said Dr. Baden and Sara Caplan found a tooth and took it from the scene. Sara Caplan said that I found a white-colored object, similar to a fingernail-size object, and subsequently placed that object in a test tube. There are obvious and major discrepancies related to conflicting observations among the witnesses. In addition, there is no evidence that anyone involved in this case lost a fingernail. Lana Clarkson only has a small chip on one of her cream-colored, acrylic artificial fingernails. The minute size of a potential chip and the color of her actual nails are completely different than what the witness said about the alleged fingernail located at the scene. 3. As I stated several times before, I did not find a fingernail nor did I take any fingernail-like material from the scene. What I found was two small bundles of white thread-like fibers imbedded in blood. These two pieces of fiber were documented in my notes and photographed before and after collection. The materials were packaged, labeled and sealed in an evidence bag. Copies of my notes and photographs were sent and reviewed by four sets of defense lawyers and members of The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office over the past four years. What I have collected, the so-called “evidence” from a “released scene” has also been turned over to The L.A. County Sheriff’s Crime Laboratory for examination. My original notes, photographs and even the negatives were all given to the L.A. District Attorney’s Office. There is no basis whatsoever for anyone to accuse me or Dr. Baden of concealing evidence in this case. 4. I do not know why my Chinese accent has become an issue in this case. I am proud of my heritage and certainly see no relevance between it and the matter at hand. I have always believed that our justice system is committed to seeking the truth and all of the relevant facts. The fact remains clear that there was no fingernail at the scene. It is clear the motive for this slanderous attack is a tactic to kill the messenger before the message is delivered. I have all the documentation and records pertaining to what I did and what I collected at the scene. If necessary, I can and will make it public to protect my good name and my professional reputation. I have also contacted my personal attorneys to look into the legal issues regarding these unjustified, slanderous, false accusations, and the damage that I will likely incur as a result of these unjust misrepresentations.”
November 24th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah…
November 24th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, everyone in America should now commit criminal tax fraud; abandon green cards; have off-shore accounts; obtain numerous social security numbers; and avoid living in Canada because there are tax and residence issues there as well. Why should Immigration take the fact that DeSouza perjured himself in Immigration documents lightly? Other people are deported for Immigration fraud. Cohen appears to have abandoned his green card and obtained a new green card because - according to what he told me - he had tax issues. I have provided the IRS with information relating to this and they can clearly speak to Immigration, review his residence history, and review how he filed his tax returns. One such document was a 1977 tax memo prepared for Leonard Cohen personally. That memo advised Cohen that he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had a residence (mentioning the U.S., Canada, and Greece) but cautioning him not to have a green card. That is the green card I believe he abandoned after Marty Machat’s death. Herschel Weinberg represented him at that time and there were serious concerns about tax issues, contracts assigned to certain entities - that related to record royalties and Sony, off-shore accounts, his numerous social security cards, and of course the green card he abandoned and re-obtained in 1991. Let me quote my former brother-in-law, Van Penick, who is an attorney in Canada; there’s no good news residence/tax wise in Canada “either.” Cohen had me speak to Van about his residence issues in Canada and Van determined that he had all the badges of a resident - including, but not limited to, residences, temple membership, and bank accounts.
I see that you are obsessed and fixated on the IRS matter with respect to Cohen and my credibility as a witness.
I see you continue to speak for the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury, and Justice Department. How about Agent Wynar-FBI. Do you speak for him as well? I know you lied to him and I believe lying to the FBI is criminal. I also think it’s rather strange that someone who doesn’t know me, but had his reporter contact me, went to the FBI about me to begin with - in an attempt to advise the FBI that I was spamming the Treasury Department. I hope the FBI has concluded it’s investigation into the Treasury Department and, specifically, why Agent Sopko-Treasury advised me to take my allegations of Cohen’s criminal tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS in Los Angeles.
When will you be filing your lawsuit against me? I want to subpoena Agent Sopko-Treasury, Agent Tejeda-IRS, Agent Wynar-FBI, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Phil Spector, and Cohen. Believe me - I will respond to your complaint and will appear in court.
Kelley Lynch
“Prosecutions by the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury and Justice Department expected ANY MOMENT!” - Blogonaut continues to play games with federal agencies and now seems to think the State of Kentucky has joined the federal government in their “prank.”
November 24th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Blogonaut-Gianelli,
Your meeting should be fascinating - with Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD should be fascinating. I’ve brought this to the attention of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Sopko-Treasury, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan. It’s amazing, to me, that you think Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, and/or Dennis Riordan would take this lightly. Your posts speak for themselves. Thanks for bringing up “Bird.” I didn’t overlook its vicious, malicious posts.
Who cares what you say about me. You don’t know me but have targeted me and participated in cyber-terrorism and, in my mind, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness intimidation, witness retaliation, threats, etc. I am obviously entitled to my opinion that you have engaged in criminal conduct. Whether the federal agencies I have contacted feel the same way is something only they can know. I don’t speak for them. I realize you do, however, although you do not work for them and seem to think this is a game and/or a prank.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
“I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people - including you - understand that I am.”
Uh, actually no we do not. We were conveying exactly the opposite understanding.
Any pathology that would allow you to read our above post and come away with that conclusion is truly amazing.
As we said, in your mind, up is down and down is up.
Now if you will excuse us, we are late for a meeting with our other co-conspirators Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD.
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-212844
November 24th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
Ms. Lynch if you wish to gain some kind of credibility, you will have to speak the truth al least sometimes. You say you have not reported ordinary bloggers to the IRS, DOJ,FBI, etc. Just in the past week I have received 16 mails in my private mailbox,from you, all cc’s to IRS, DOJ, FBI, Weinberg, Riordan and others, regarding my posts on Phawker, and that is from someone you clearly do not know, just a casual blogger, right?
Do you have any evidence that all these public offices and lawyers ever receive your crazy mails? they may just have blocked your mails from their mailbox. You obviously have never received any replies.
Do you have any evidence that, if Leonard Cohen did have a “tax-problem” that this has not been paid off a long time ago? and maybe just he did not feel it was needed to inform you about it?
You keep on bringing up that “Blogonaut” offered to get you in touch with Leonard Cohen, “who would be willing to help you get your life and your children back, all you had to do in return was lie” . I am not speaking for Blogonaut, and they are ofcourse welcome to correct me if I am wrong, but the only thing I have ever read on Blogonaut in connection with “Cohen being willing to help you” was several months ago, when we all felt a bit sorry for you, and Blogonaut said that they felt many of your old friends in Los Angeles would be willing to help you, and maybe even Leonard Cohen would be willing to help you, if you were willing to get som help with your various problems.
You indeed seems to have a very selective memory and presentation of the truth and facts.
Susanne
November 24th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Trust me, Walsh, I’m not interested in you.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Walsh,
If Cohen is so willing to help me why doesn’t he undertake to have a complete and proper forensic accounting done - that includes my assets that he has stolen from me. Cohen and his lawyers have the corporate books, records, stock certificates, etc. relating to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., etc. It would be immensely helpful if he paid me what he owes me. I don’t have any problems so I don’t need help with anything. Not to worry - I’m surrounded by excellent witnesses and have been so the slanderous allegations and lies won’t hold water.
Kelley Lynch
You keep on bringing up that “Blogonaut” offered to get you in touch with Leonard Cohen, “who would be willing to help you get your life and your children back, all you had to do in return was lie” . I am not speaking for Blogonaut, and they are ofcourse welcome to correct me if I am wrong, but the only thing I have ever read on Blogonaut in connection with “Cohen being willing to help you” was several months ago, when we all felt a bit sorry for you, and Blogonaut said that they felt many of your old friends in Los Angeles would be willing to help you, and maybe even Leonard Cohen would be willing to help you, if you were willing to get som help with your various problems.
Y
November 24th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
An Open Letter From Phil Spector To A Good Friend.
Sunday July 26th
Steven,
I had no voice the day I was sentenced in court on May 30th 2009 due to throat papalomas I had removed 3-days earlier on the 27th.of May. It left me with no voice. I was indeed very upset because when I was asked to address the court, I could not speak for I had no voice. What I wanted to say follows: Be it known that I, Phillip Spector had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the death of Lana Clarkson. And irrefutable science and five of the greatest, most famous forensic scientists all swore under oath that Ms. Clarkson died of a self inflicted gun shot wound, a suicide. They swore by irrefutable science. And while juries and judges lie and make mistakes, science and DNA do not. When their scientific findings and words were ignored is a mystery to me, and hopefully will not be ignored by the appellate court. And I shall return.
But let it also be known that there IS a murderer in the court room and it is NOT Phil Spector, it is Alan Jackson. During the trial he murdered the truth, ,he murdered the constitution, he murdered the law, and he murdered my reputation, and he should not go unpunished for his dastardly deeds. He used his five little “groupies” women, one of whom recently overdosed and died from drugs, and could not be here to testify to slander and lie about me, and victimize me so that he could get his conviction without any scientific proof whatsoever. That’s because he had none. He lied and cheated and double crossed that before along with his cohort Truc Doe whenever they got to it, yes my friends, HE is the real murderer. But, what goes around comes around. And the appellate court will see through his chicanery and smoke and mirrors, and false law and overturn my conviction, and then I will be back stronger than ever, a free man as I should be. Until then, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
Steven, I would like this published verbatim from the beginning of this letter to the end. And tell Chris Paven to also put it on my website.
Thanks, Phillip
November 24th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
The two have already clashed, with Mr Cutler accusing Mr Jackson of “smirking and giggling like a little girl” when the deputy district attorney complained to Judge Larry Fidler about Mr Cutler’s abrasive style. He added that calling Mr Jackson “girly” was “not sexist. I’m quoting the governor of California”.
November 24th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Walsh, the reason you have received emails from me is 1) you contact me from time to time - including to offer me your sympathies - by email; and 2) you are lying and slandering me and I am correcting those lies and slander. I’ve been clear about this. I will continue to address all lies and slander.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
Kelley’s Email to Chief Mark Beckner - Boulder PD
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Chief Mark Beckner - Boulder PD
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 7:03 PM
Hello Mark,
Are your officers, who targeted me, meeting with Gianelli-Blogonaut who seems to have been communicating with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson and was in touch with Cohen’s legal team and is dead set on slandering me. Of course, Boulder PD is being used to undermine my credibility. That’s why I went to trial and that’s why I will continue to litigate my so-called matters with Boulder PD who is all over this story.
Any thoughts on why Officer Storbeck rolled into Deneuve Construction? The Denver FBI thought the Boulder DA and/or Attorney General of Colorado (both copied in here) should investigate this matter. I thought the timing was interesting - I just hung up with “Officer Garrin” of LAPD after attempting to leave a message for “Officer Maurice Hampton” LAPD who - together with Erma Oppenhein - took me to King Drew and questioned me about Phil Spector.
As Chief of Police, do you think Phil Spector thinks this is a laughing matter? Blogonaut-Gianelli does. And, of course, Joff Belark thought it was appropriate to send Rutger’s email to Boulder PD. Therefore, Boulder PD is all over this story, has been asked to target me and my son, and has been used to intimidate my son - someone I (and David Moorhead) view as a “material witness.” Of course, Phawker’s Blog contains interesting comments about the IRS being laughed out of Court because they are dead set on undermining me as a potential “prominent government witness.” I would assume you realize that witness tampering, etc., is criminal.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Yeah Lynch and how is that working for you??? The more you try to be “clear” the more you discredit yourself and make yourself look stupid and insane.
I did not say Leonard Cohen had offered to help you, Blogonaut said that he “may want to help you if you got some help” all the other things you claimed “was said” you made up yourself.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Walsh, I am clear on who said what. Blogonaut stated publicly that he had been in touch with Cohen’s legal team and/or advisers. He mentioned Robert Kory and Michelle Blaine. He wrote that Cohen would probably be willing to help me and that he, Blogonaut, could arrange that. This is how I interpreted his comments. All I had to do was lie. This is what I was asked to do before - lie and say Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. I am clear about your statements. They are posted on this Blog and need no edification. Are you now legally representing Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut. If so, read up on the laws re. lying to the FBI to begin with.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Yes, I believe he said that Cohen would probably be willing to help you (along with several other old friends, if you got help) As I remenber he said nothing about arranging that help, and absolutely not that the condition was that you would lie. That, Ms. Lynch is a lie.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Same story, same accusations, same twisted words from the same twisted mind for, what, 5 years now. No logic, no trace of clear mindedness, no supportive comments, no sign of intelligent thought, no one responds to her 1,000 or so emails all over the country, no attempts to get a job, no let-up in her delusional accusations, no follow-through on threats of criminal prosecution. No nothing - NO NOTHING from a know-nothing woman who would rather spend every day and every night displaying her psychosis on-line instead of getting a job and supporting herself. Gee, what a concept - support herself instead of living off the tax-payers dollar and sucking up public resources that could be used for those who are truly in need and not just too lazy to support herself. Again, Kelley Lynch, you are a loser with no apparent interest nor cognizance of what a normal person does but instead lives off the public dole and threatens anyone who challenges her. Loser, loser, loser, loser, loser.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
I don’t need help and have plenty of witnesses to this fact. Perhaps Cohen, if he thinks I need help, needs some himself. As you have read, he has a history of substance abuse, failed relationships, has taken psychiatric medications, used prescription meth (he loved this story about telling his pharmacologist that he wasn’t going to knock over a bank), and drank substantial amounts - of expensive wines (including Chateau Latour) nightly. I have not seen Leonard Cohen since October 2004 so he probably wouldn’t even recognize me. He also does not know the people I have spent time with since refusing to meet with him and his advisers - to unravel the corporate entities that he and his advisers created for his benefit. My young son’s father hasn’t seen me since Rutger and I appeared in Court to witness the sham custody matter that I view as an attempt to obstruct justice and Robert Kory’s Declaration is, to me, evidence of witness tampering with my minor son and a coercive attempt to crush me into a deal. After all, Kory does not know my younger son who asked me to tell Kory to “go fuck himself” after he witnessed our conversation about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats.
Why would someone like Cohen, who has gone to such lengths to silence me and who destroyed my life and targeted my children and elderly parents, now want to help me? Any thoughts, Ms. Walsh?
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
You’re wrong, Ms. Walsh. Blogonaut offered to put me in touch with Cohen. I captured that remark made on his public Blog.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
Did you also capture that “the condition for Blogonaut to put you in touch with Cohen was you you had to lie”?? or did you make that up yourself?
Cohen has not targeted you and your children or parents, neither have the bloggers on the internet. You have created this situation for yourself.
Oh what a language for a young boy to have (your son) I wonder where he could have learned that??? not from his “intelligent, credible, sane Mother, right?
November 24th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
That’s correct Sydney - the same story and the same accusations. These are not twisted words. They are true words backed up and supported by real evidence that I provided the IRS, Phil Spector’s legal team, and others - with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. I have been telling this story for approximately 5 years. In fact, after receiving an email from the IRS website I began emailing evidence to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Substantial evidence. Some of that is now public record - attached to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s attempt to silence me in Boulder, Colorado proving to me, and others, that he is truly insane.
I have absolute evidence, as well, of my attempts to find work and you will be surprised. In fact, I could probably compete for a Guinness Book of World Records title. I’ve documented my job search - since being “wrongfully terminated” by Cohen after I refused to hand over the corporate books, records, notarized documents, stock certificates, etc. and refusing to meet with him and his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, to unravel their creative tax planning and sham structures. I chose, instead, to follow Dale Burgess’ advise and sought legal advice from tax lawyers who confirmed, ultimately, that Cohen had used me as an unwitting pawn; noted in writing that all facts prove that I repeatedly attempted to determine the facts and whether or not something was wrong with the entities, etc.; and told me Cohen “exposed” me to criminal tax fraud. Since you don’t know me and have not reviewed the evidence I sent the IRS you really cannot comment on Leonard Cohen’s Tax Fraud Matter. You are, however, slandering me and lying about me which is quite bizarre given the fact that we are complete strangers and you do not know me.
I have never threatened criminal prosecution. That would be difficult for me to threaten since I’m not a U.S. Prosecutor. I have asked for investigations into certain matters - including Gianelli-Blogonaut’s lies to Agent Wynar/FBI Oakland and want an investigation into whether or not he has attempted to obstruct justice, coerce me into what I believe would be an illegal deal with Cohen, and has witness tampered, etc. I know I am the victim of cyber-terrorism and, clearly, believe that and other issues need investigating.
I do not live off taxpayer dollars but paid enough in taxes, over the years, to collect food stamps for a few months. I also paid the IRS approximately $165,000 in taxes on an entity that Cohen appears to have fraudulent attempted to prove I did not own. I want to know whether or not Judge Ken Freeman reviewed the corporate books and records and, if not, how he determined I was a trustee which I was not.
Sydney, you’re not in third grade are you?
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Loser, loser, loser, loser, loser.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Walsh, I captured the comments. Why paraphrase. Gianelli-Blogonaut’s comments on Blogonaut’s Blog speak for themselves. I think I was and am being asked to lie. I have no issues, whatsoever, with substance abuse and therefore seeking help for issues I don’t have in order to have Leonard Cohen “help” me is lunacy.
Cohen has indeed targeted me and my children. Explain Robert Kory’s Declaration in Ray’s custody matter - that arose after Ray witnessed a conversation between me and Kory re. Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that Cohen stole, and their threats. I thought Ray’s language was dead on - tell him to go fuck himself. That’s precisely what I thought. I think he learned it because he’s brilliant and saw right through his father’s insanity and understood what was going on. He also witneessed the conversation that amazed Boies Schiller. And, of course, he knows his father and understands that he is an abusive and malicious man who was just waiting to take him away from me. Why? According to Ray - because his father understood how close we were and, of course, “money.” That makes me think of his father calling Rutger as I was being taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector. Lindsey wanted Rutger to go in and sign documents transferring my house to Cohen/Kory. Douglas Penick, Rutger’s Father, can confirm this as Rutger immediately phoned him. Lindsey has not paid me what he owes me and his own son feared I would be murdered when I ended up homeless so this tells me that his father is capable of anything. In fact, I know he is and witnessed his vicodin abuse, gambling habit, vicious and abusive parenting, and the fact that he was hysterical about losing the publishing that included songs written by Mike Elizondo for Dr. Dre, Eminem, 50 Cent, and others.
Kelley Lynch
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
Did you also capture that “the condition for Blogonaut to put you in touch with Cohen was you you had to lie”?? or did you make that up yourself?
Cohen has not targeted you and your children or parents, neither have the bloggers on the internet. You have created this situation for yourself.
Oh what a language for a young boy to have (your son) I wonder where he could have learned that??? not from his “intelligent, credible, sane Mother, right?
November 24th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
We have never stated that we had been “in touch” with Robert Kory or Michelle Blaine.
In approximately June of 2009 and after we heard from your former LA friends who urged us to consider that Lynch was a good person but simply had a serious substance abuse problem, we speculated (in the comments) that perhaps your ex-husband or Cohen might help you with the expenses of rehab.
Hours later you assured us that you had no friends in LA–that your former friends were all addicts and worse.
You later tried to spin this well meaning compasionate comment as a “bribe” to drop the (nonexistant) federal tax case.
You read what you want to read and hear waht you want to hear.
November 24th, 2009 at 4:10 pm
Let me just clarify some further misinformatoin and/or lies. I formerly lived in a house valued at approximately $1.8 million and intend to sue Cohen, Lindsey, and others for the damage to my family. We lost our house solely because I refused to make what I was told would have been an illegal deal with Cohen. Period. Lindsey, who owes me money as well, inserted himself into this situation and is going to be held accountable. His son, and others, are already well aware of what this abusive and vicious man is capable of.
I was Cohen’s personal manager for approximately 18 years. I was never his business manager. Rich Feldstein, however, was his business manager and Cohen’s letter to him in response to Rich Feldstein’s interest in meeting him face to face and advising him to pay estimated taxes is not to be believed. He had bookkeepers and was well aware of his financial situation. He had investors - Dean Witter and Neal Greenberg/Agile Group who handled his investments and as Cohen himself said was the guardian of the assets that Cohen and others wasted and permitted to be wasted. I made a substantial commission on the sale of certain assets. I would have made more had Cohen not insisted on a stock deal - based on his utter and absolute disdain for ordinary income taxes. Other years, I didn’t make all that much so let’s not over-glamorize the situation. I also worked incredibly hard and have been credited with reviving Cohen’s career. He himself, in Billboard Magazine, called me a blessing to him and his family.
It’s Cohen who is in a fantasy world if he thinks Phil Spector and I are taking responsibility for his wrong-doing (civil or criminal).
Kelley Lynch
Kelley–Give us a break Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
“Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids.” Huh?
Obviously, we have a different yard stick for rock bottom. (For me morphing into a homeless ranting nutcase would be the skids, especially if I formerly lived in a $3 million home with a pool in a nice part of Los Angeles, had two wonderful kids, was a business manager for a well known music figure, negotiated multi-million dollar deals, and made seven figures in a single year.
Perhaps I can put it in terms that you might understand: Compared to Leonard Cohen you are a dung beetle.
You have constructed quite a fantasy world for yourself Kelley.
November 24th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
“We lost our house solely because I refused to make what I was told would have been an illegal deal with Cohen. Period.”
Interesting.
So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?
November 24th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Blogonaut-Gianelli, I was under the impression that you publicly stated that you were in touch with Cohen’s advisers and mentioned Kory and Rice. I captured all the comments and postings on your Blog that related to me so I will review them. Your words will and do speak for themselves. Michelle Blaine publicly thanked you on her Blog for targeting my Blogs and email accounts and you have publicly posted on her mControl Blog - as did Belark - which I also captured. Are you saying you didn’t?
Why keep my former friends mysterious? I have no former friends in Los Angeles. I was surrounded by certain con artists who I have discarded. I assume you are not referring to Ron Burkle who is copied in on all my public emails. I can assure you that Mr. Burkle is a brilliant man and does not view my emails as spam and I can assure you that you do not speak for Mr. Burkle. I haven’t seen any former friends in Los Angeles - con artists as well - and, therefore, no one can address who or what I am. They certainly cannot say I have substance abuse issues because I do not and even if hell froze over you could not prove that. This is why I have, to a great extent, attempted to address your lies, slander, calculated comments, etc. - that would include Joff Belark’s lie about me disguised as an article.
You absolutely stated that you were in touch with Cohen’s advisers and you publicly stated that you were not in touch with Steven Clark Lindsey who would have already helped me and, therefore, his insane excuse (if that’s what he intends to say) that he wanted Rutger to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory (while I was en route to Killer King being question about Phil Spector) is deranged and delusional. You did not state that Cohen and/or Lindsey would help with rehab costs/expenses. You are now embellishing your comments. Why you are so interested in me or helping me is bizarre, however, since we do not know one another.
Some of the con artists who inserted themselves into Cohen’s tax fraud matter and the Phil Spector set up were absolutely addicted to vicodin, etc.
I was offered 50% community property and Dale Burgess will testify to this fact - by Robert Kory on behalf of Leonard Cohen - presumably, according to my lawyers, to lie and say Cohen was defrauded. Has Cohen suddenly decided to take the blame for his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. If so - tell him to publicly make that statement and he can help me by repaying me what he owes me and has stolen from me. Agent Bill Betzer/IRS thought he owed me 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.
How do you know that there is a non-existent tax matter? Do you work for the IRS or has the IRS confirmed this for you? I remain mystified by the fact that you feel so comfortable speaking on behalf of the IRS but, then again, you have no qualms - whatsoever - slandering and lying about a total stranger. And, you and your “reporter,” Joff Belark, intentionally overlooked the evidence I directed you to. That would be the evidence I have filed (so far) against Cohen with my Motion to Quash his garbage attempts to silence me in Boulder Municipal Court. And yes, I asked that that garbage restraining order meant to silence me be made permanent. I also advised the Court that Cohen’s entire Declaration is perjured - as is the process server’s Affidavit. As a lawyer, are you taking the position that perjury in a court of law is acceptable? Since I am convinced Cohen also perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury I would say he has a pattern of lying in court and to a grand jury. Of course, that is based on Mick Brown’s email to me advising me that he received a package with the grand jury testimony from Phil Spector’s grand jury and Cohen testified in that matter. He also appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine which is strange since he advised the detectives Steve Cron and I met that his comments (to the news media over the years about Mr. Spector) were good rock ‘n roll comments. No doubt Mr. Spector can subpoena the detectives notes and reports.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
We have never stated that we had been “in touch” with Robert Kory or Michelle Blaine.
In approximately June of 2009 and after we heard from your former LA friends who urged us to consider that Lynch was a good person but simply had a serious substance abuse problem, we speculated (in the comments) that perhaps your ex-husband or Cohen might help you with the expenses of rehab.
Hours later you assured us that you had no friends in LA–that your former friends were all addicts and worse.
You later tried to spin this well meaning compasionate comment as a “bribe” to drop the (nonexistant) federal tax case.
You read what you want to read and hear waht you want to hear.
November 24th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, of course it was ultimately do to the fact that I couldn’t make my mortgage payments but Cohen owes me millions and has stolen my intellectual property and shares of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Have you had a chance to review the corporate indexes? Had I made the illegal deal Cohen wanted me to make, and accepted the offer of 50% community property, I wouldn’t have lost my house - now would I? When you file your lawsuit against me I intend to call Dale Burgess to the witness stand who asked me to confirm for the IRS and Treasury Agents that he witnessed this offer and wanted me to be sure to confirm for them that my lawyers understood this was “criminal tax fraud.” I’m not sure why he wanted me to tell the IRS and Treasury Agents that my lawyers understood it was “criminal tax fraud” but I’m assuming it’s because they wanted to figure in a settlement amount (with Cohen) re. my “exposure” to criminal tax fraud after they told me that once fraud is brought to your attention you cannot make a deal. In fact, they told me I had two choices: amend the tax returns and/or report the fraud to the IRS. I reported the fraud to the IRS because of the complicated structures and tax issues and because I did not trust anyone to amend them. I have now filed final tax returns and am awaiting Opinion Letters from the State of Kentucky and IRS. Since other citizens request and receive Opinion Letters I can’t imagine why the State of Kentucky and/or IRS would discriminate against me even if I am a potential “prominent government witness” and the IRS could be laughed out of court if the attempts to slander and undermine my credibility work. They won’t. I’m telling the truth and you and others - including Cohen - are lying.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
“We lost our house solely because I refused to make what I was told would have been an illegal deal with Cohen. Period.”
Interesting.
So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?
November 24th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.
2. We know that no federal tax charges have beed filed against
Cohen because we subscribe to Pacer.
3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense. You are a loon, and only the loon does not know it.
4. So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?
E-A-R-T-H T-O K-E-L-L-E-Y L-Y-N-C-H:
When you stop paying your mortagage, the lender (who was not Cohen) forecloses. It is not the dog’s fault, your ex-husbands fault or Cohen’s fault.
November 24th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
I also intend to hold Cohen, Lindsey, and others responsible for the phantom taxes that have apparently arisen from the foreclosure on my house. Gianelli-Blogonaut are you sure you’re a lawyer? It’s hard to imagine a lawyer who doesn’t understand slander, defamation, libel, corporate structures, fraud, etc. Then again, you may have some ulterior motive and you were in touch with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson and have lied to Agent Wynar-FBI. Agent Wynar-FBI is going to have to take the witness stand and swear to the hearsay you have repeated on this Blog and elsewhere. Either that - or I will prove that you have perjured yourself because, at that time, we will be in court. So - either you lied to the FBI or Agent Wynar has liability issues and has slandered me although he doesn’t know me. It’s quite straightforward.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
I’m not an idiot so I think we’re finished with the mortage foreclosure issue. Why it interests you remains bizarre, however. Strangers are not usually this fixated or obsessed on people they’ve never met and don’t know.
Who is appreciative that you are speaking up in the face of my emails? Alan Jackson - the Spector prosecutor who was in touch with you and may have found a sympathetic ear with you because you are dead set on slandering me and undermining my credibility - possibly as a potential “prominent government witness” as someone pointed out on this Blog last night.
I also know that no federal charges have been filed against Cohen. I do not know that there is nothing pending, however, and I have repeatedly stated that you cannot possibly know that either although you have publicly proclaimed otherwise.
It is laughable, to me, that a trial lawyer with thirty some years experience would engage in slander, defamation, and cyber-terrorism targeted at an absolute stranger.
I see you’re attempting to keep Steven Clark Lindsey credible. Good luck. You’ll need it.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.
2. We know that no federal tax charges have beed filed against
Cohen because we subscribe to Pacer.
3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense. You are a loon, and only the loon does not know it.
4. So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?
E-A-R-T-H T-O K-E-L-L-E-Y L-Y-N-C-H:
When you stop paying your mortagage, the lender (who was not Cohen) forecloses. It is not the dog’s fault, your ex-husbands fault or Cohen’s fault.
November 24th, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Gianelli - Blogonaut, are you willing to take the stand and testify to this in a court of law? How could you possibly know this? Did Agent Sopko or Agent Wynar confirm this for you? I know that’s why you contacted them. That’s my conclusion anyway. Kelley Lynch
We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you
November 24th, 2009 at 4:59 pm
On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: IRS Commissioner’s Staff
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 8:58 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me? Did Agent Sopko or Agent Wynar confirm this for him? This is precisely why I concluded that Gianelli-Blogonaut lied to Agent Wynar and contacted Agent Sopko. This is not mindless, innocent activity. And, how does Gianelli-Blogonaut know that persons on my emails documenting the destruction of my life are “appreciative for speaking up” but it doesn’t mean that were “in touch.” Gianelli-Blogonaut must be referring to Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, and perhaps Steven Clark Lindsey. I would say that I have a real liar on my hands - a real liar with motive.
All the best,
Kelley
1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.
November 24th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Gianelli, you’re not reading Alan Jackson’s mind again, are you?
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
KELLEY LYNCH ASKS:
“How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me?”
1. With Kelley Lynch as the whistle blower, it s simply a matter of common sense.
2. The fact that over four years later no criminal charges have been filed (all the more so, with each and every passing day) also adds to our hypothesis.
3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.
November 24th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
“Gianelli, you’re not reading Alan Jackson’s mind again, are you?”
One does not require the ability to read minds to predict your future.
November 24th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: I Think I’ve Recognized The Federal Government’s Oracle
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 9:25 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,
I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week - which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. I was told, in writing, that his penalties and interest as of October 2004 were somewhere in the vicinity of approximately $10 million with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC and that similar amounts were accruing with respect to LC Investments, LLC and Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. That does not take into account, from what I recall, the missing state tax returns and/or missing taxes due the State of Kentucky. I am also curious to hear the State of Kentucky’s position on LC Investments, LLC and specifically with respect to the illegal K1s issued by LC Investments, LLC in Kentucky. I filed a Motion to Quash Cohen’s garbage insanity meant to silence me in Boulder, Colorado. I attached evidence with that Motion - including correspondence from Richard Westin, the corporate indexes, and my lawyers legal interpretation of the legal issues between me and Cohen which is adequate for now. You might also want to review Dale Burgess’ fax to my lawyers advising them of the assets, etc., Kevin Prins/Moss Adams informed Mr. Burgess were missing from the fraudulent “ledger” Cohen attached to his bogus lawsuit against me in Los Angeles, California. I would also like the IRS and State of Kentucky’s Opinion on whether or not you view me as a trustee - constructive or otherwise. I did not view myself as a trustee and that is not supported by the corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, attorney/client memorandums, etc.
I would also like to know how Stephen Gianelli-Blogonaut is able to factually state what the federal government or State of Kentucky is or is not doing. How would he know? I continue to maintain that he lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury in order to determine if there is a federal criminal matter “pending” and whether or not I am a potential prominent government witness who he is clearly “tampering” with in a blatant attempt to undermine my credibility as a witness even though I am a strange to him.
All the best,
Kelley Lynch
That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho (gratuitous) blog or claim in your nut-job (gratuitous) emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.
Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-212934
November 24th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, Why is it a matter of common sense that you know for a fact that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me? That does not make any sense - common or otherwise. You do not know me and neither do the people slandering me on this and other Blogs so it would be impossible for you to say anything about me as a “whistle blower” or potential “prominent government witness” although you do seem dead set on slandering me and attempting to undermine my credibility as a witness. Of course, that will be impossible based on lies and you - a lawyer - know that you must prove your statements and allegations in court. You must also realize that the statements you have repeated of Agent Wynar’s and Agent Sopko’s are as of this moment in time hearsay. They themselves will have to take the stand - as will Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan - all of whom you have previously spoken on behalf of publicly.
You did not say that your position that there will be no federal prosecution of Cohen was a hypothesis. See your own comment below. Thank you for confirming that you understand I am a whistle blower although I think of myself as a citizen who reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud. Your obsession with Cohen’s tax fraud and undermining my credibility is incredibly bizarre and one must question your “motive.”
Kelley Lynch
3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense.
3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.
November 24th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
You forgot to address the how you know that “many other persons” on my email list (documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into the Phil Spector matter that is clearly a set up) “are appreciative for speaking up” if you weren’t in touch with them. I assume you mean Alan Jackson and Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers since those are the parties I felt you were somehow in touch with. I think it’s obvious that I can and intend to subpoena all email communications between you and these parties and intelligent people have stated that “the feds” (as your crowd likes to call them) should seize your computer and Alan Jackson’s computer - probably others as well … say Robert Kory’s for instance.
Kelley Lynch
1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.
November 24th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Alan Jackson - How Does Blogonaut-Gianelli Know These Things?
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane
date Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:42 PM
subject Alan Jackson - How Does Blogonaut-Gianelli Know These Things?
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 1:42 PM (1 minute ago)
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
You forgot to address the how you know that “many other persons” on my email list (documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into the Phil Spector matter that is clearly a set up) “are appreciative for speaking up” if you weren’t in touch with them. I assume you mean Alan Jackson and Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers since those are the parties I felt you were somehow in touch with. I think it’s obvious that I can and intend to subpoena all email communications between you and these parties and intelligent people have stated that “the feds” (as your crowd likes to call them) should seize your computer and Alan Jackson’s computer - probably others as well … say Robert Kory’s for instance.
Kelley Lynch
1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-212954
November 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,
“I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week - which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”
Good luck, Ms. Lynch. Haaaaha whoooooo whoooo, hahaheeeeee, hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please contact this blog IMMEDIATELY upon ANY response from the IRS or the State of Kentucky expressly stating that Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted, in which event we will hurl ourselves, en masse, from the 17th floor of our building, because the world will surely be coming to an end at that point.
“I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
You are so very amusing, Ms. Lynch, however unwittingly.
But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.
Ergo, unless you read about us and Cohen in the papers in the next few days or weeks, it is you that is, quite possibly, a looooon.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
It is unconscionable that you think tampering with what is clearly a potential federal criminal prosecution and a potential prominent government witness is a game and a joke. You are a lawyer and an officer of the court and cannot deny that you understand the laws relating to obstruction of justice, witness tampering, etc. It is nauseating to see you state, publicly, that if I am correct the IRS would be “darned annoyed” at your “witness tampering” and would charge everyone concerned. That is precisely what I have been saying and what I believe.
I’m glad you think Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million is literally a laughing matter.
Why would I have to read about this iin the paper in the next few days or weeks? Do you control when the IRS, or any other agency or individual, has to act - particularly in a high profile federal criminal prosecution with the set up of an innocent man involved? That is not amusing and I can assure you that Phil Spector wouldn’t find it amusing. Do you think the venerable Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan would? Go ahead - speak for them. Set the record straight on behalf of Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan.
I think there is something seriously wrong with you and I know that you are an unstable, arrogant liar with motive. You have proven this to me - time and time again.
Kelley Lynch
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Kelley Questions Gianelli-Blogonaut About Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, et al.
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 9:55 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
This person is clearly unstable and deranged. Are you darned annoyed with Gianelli-Blogonaut’s obvious witness tampering? It is impossible to explain this away as frivolity and Gianelli-Blogonaut is a lawyer. The IRS would charge everyone if they believed this is witness tampering. That is precisely what I believe. Why? Because it’s a serious matter and criminal conduct. Look at Blogonaut-Gianelli’s latest posting. It is shameless and it is very very twisted and sadistic. In any event, Blogonaut-Gianelli is having a grand old time with Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal and the ongoing attempts to slander me and undermine my credibility as a potential prominent government whistle. He himself confirmed that I am a “whistle blower” and there are legal protections in place for whistle blowers although the District Attorney, Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Rice, Bergman, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Belark, Blaine, and others could care less.
I am convinced that this is major witness tampering and Gianelli-Blogonaut should be prosecuted for federal crimes including, but not limited to, witness tampering. That is my personal opinion and while Gianelli-Blogonaut freely and publicly speaks on behalf of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce, Cutler and others, I do not. It’s preposterous and outrageous and possibly criminal conduct.
All the best,
Kelley
But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,
“I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week - which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”
Good luck, Ms. Lynch. Haaaaha whoooooo whoooo, hahaheeeeee, hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please contact this blog IMMEDIATELY upon ANY response from the IRS or the State of Kentucky expressly stating that Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted, in which event we will hurl ourselves, en masse, from the 17th floor of our building, because the world will surely be coming to an end at that point.
“I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
You are so very amusing, Ms. Lynch, however unwittingly.
But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.
Ergo, unless you read about us and Cohen in the papers in the next few days or weeks, it is you that is, quite possibly, a looooon.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
PS:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
You’re not hitting the white wine by any chance, are you? It’s hard to believe that a lawyer with thirty years trial experience would behave like this.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Kelley Lynch said:
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
This person is clearly unstable and deranged. Are you darned annoyed with Gianelli-Blogonaut’s obvious witness tampering? It is impossible to explain this away as frivolity and Gianelli-Blogonaut is a lawyer. The IRS would charge everyone if they believed this is witness tampering. That is precisely what I believe. Why? Because it’s a serious matter and criminal conduct.”
Dear Ms. Lynch:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA—WHOOOOOWHOWHOHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Stunning Arrogance
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:18 PM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Is this nut really a trial lawyer? He is “proudly” witness tampering and challenging the IRS to charge him from what I can tell.
Love,
Kelley
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Stunning Arrogance
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:17 PM
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
PS:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
You’re not hitting the white wine by any chance, are you? It’s hard to believe that a lawyer with thirty years trial experience would behave like this.
Kelley Lynch
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23
November 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
ps:
HAHAHAHAHAHHAWhooowhoooooHAAAAAA!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
They’re coming to take me away, HA HA
They’re coming to take me away, HO HO HEE HEE HA HA
To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all the time
And I’ll be happy to see
Those nice, young men
In their clean, white coats
And they’re coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!
You thought it was a joke
And so you laughed
You laughed when I had said
That losing you would make me flip my lid
Right. . .
You know you laughed, I heard you laugh
You laughed, you laughed and laughed
And then you left
But now you know I’m utterly mad!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
No, noone could possibly see the humor in Kelley Lynch’s assertions. HAAAHooooHaaaHAHAHA!!!!!!
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,
I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week - which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”
HA-Haaaa–whowhoooo-Haaaaa!!!!
Dear Kelley Lynch:
We will get right on that…HAHAHAHAWhoooohwhooooHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
November 24th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Stephen Gianelli - Blogonaut: Witness Tampering, Etc.
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:38 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Proving, time and time again, that this is a game for him.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
ps:
HAHAHAHAHAHHAWhooowhoooooHAAAAAA!!!!!
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
When you arrive in California late tomorrow to visit your son Rutger courtesy of a bus ticket provided by the Star of Hope and stop by to report us to your local police department please be sure to mention that you have outstanding warrants for your arrest and to give the nice officer the contact information for our attorney, Stephen R. Gianelli, who would be happy to fill the officer in on your activities and current legal status.
Please do mention your arrest record in Los Angeles, California and Bounder Colorado and how all of this is pursuant to a grand conspiracy against you because you have been “targeted” to discredit you as a witness to Leonard Cohen’s “tax fraud” that you reported five years ago (with no prosecution).
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
PS: do not forget to mention to then nice officer your claim that you were “kidnapped” by the LAPD and taken to a psychiatric facility against your will (Killer King), your previously published belief that LA Swat was there to “murder” you to silence you, as well as your claim that the LAPD then falsified its report as well as the Killer King records in order to “discredit” you as a witness against Cohen—all aid the “set up” of Phil Spector on murder charges. Please do also mention that this is only one of two involuntary psychiatric commitments that you have suffered.
Law Blog Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Since Ms. Lynch is fond of publishing her hundreds of monthly emails to her various spam victims on various internet sites, here is our response to Kelley Lynch’s 12th email of today:
November 18, 2009
Dear Ms. Lynch:
We do not understand why you are copying this blog with personal correspondence that you have sent to your son, sister, and brother-in-law–or at all–since you represented to us on September 3, 2009 that you would be dropping us from your email list—per your agreement with an investigator with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.
Your emails (a dozen today) are unwanted spam. Clearly you are a very disturbed woman.
This blog was required to ban you from commenting as a result of your habit of posting slanderous material about various persons.
As you have recently advised us, you have been reduced to living in a homeless shelter despite living near your mother, sister and brother-in-law–who obviously are as tired of your daily drama as are we–to the point that they have (apparently) washed their hands of you.
We are sorry that you have decided not to seek psychiatric help but at this point it’s not our problem.
It was very cleaver of the City of Houston to provide you with a bus ticket our of their jurisdiction.
If only we could do the same.
What a shame that you have not sought help and that as a result instead of spending the Holliday’s with family, you are moving on, alone, once again to another state.
Please do not contact this blog, our attorney, or anyone else affiliated with us again. We are quite confident that your mother, son and sister are not thrilled about your copying your emails to them to us and the rest of your spam email list (including the IRS, Justice Department, etc. etc.) either.
–Blogonaut Law Blog
Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
November 19, 2009
Dear Kelley Lynch:
As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist slandering Blogonaut, this office, and any other persons affiliated with us, on the internet, including but not limited to your blogs, or otherwise.
If you fail to so desist, I will be suing you, David McCourt, Karen McCourt, Rutger Penick, and all other persons whom you have claimed to Blogonaut in writing have aided and encouraged you to pursue this course of action.
Please govern yourself accordingly.
By email, we are so informing David, Karen, and Rudger.
This office is well aware of your current whereabouts in California, and is fully prepared to sue you, Rutger, Karen and David forthwith, should you post a single additional disparaging comment about Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, including the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
Stephen R. Gianelli
PO Box 475013
San Francisco, California 94147
(415) 929-5130
CC; Karen McCourt, David McCourt, Rudger Penick
Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
November 20th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
To cut to the chase:
1. Kelley Lynch ha already sent over 400 emails to the IRS, the Justice Department, state attorney’s general, local DA’s, Treasury Agent Kelley Sopko, governors, mayors, media outlets and a hundred other email recipients falsely accusing me of “cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation”, and other serious felony crimes.
2. She started doing this because she hijacked a blog that I am counsel for, Blogonaut, posted 60+ items falsely accusing various persons of serious crimes (manufacturing meth, child molestation, tax fraud, and other crimes) and was then banned from the blog. I then addressed Kelley Lynch’s emails and attempted comments on the blog that she had apprised high profile attorney Bruce Cutler of the situation and had asked him to look into suing Blogonaut.
I sent Cutler a letter, he immediately phoned me, and we thereafter had several cordial telephone conversations wherein Cutler made it clear that he did not represent Lynch, he did not know Lynch, he had never even spoken to or written Lynch, but that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him 10 to 20 very long harassing voice messages for him EVERY DAY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, and that Mr. Cutler regarded Kelley Lynch as the “worst telephone stalker I have ever encountered”. Cutler also told me that Lynch had been sending him hundreds of very long (50+ page) unsolicited and ranting faxes daily for several months until his office complained to her then employer, who stopped the faxes from Lynch’s workplace.
3. Kelley Lynch cc’d Blogonaut with scores of emails to high profile security consultant to Phil Spector Bill Pavelic, including a very disturbing email wherein Lynch, in the conversational style of old, good friends, asked that he assemble a team of investigators to investigate me, several Cohen attorneys, and man other persons. I emailed Bill Pavelic who informed me that he had absolutely no association with Kelley Lynch “who is obviously a very disturbed woman”.
4. I emailed Treasury Agent Sopko, who called me back to advise that I should not be concerned with the scores of emails by Kelley Lynch to her demanding my arrest and prosecution because no reasonable person would regard Kelley Lynch as credible.
5. I have been in touch with an FBI agent who told me I had nothing to fear from Ms. Lynch’s many reports to the FBI because Lynch was a “classic 5150” (cop talk for nut job).
6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.
7. Kelley Lynch is a very sick and disturbed person, who in the past 48 hours has sent me and/or the blog I represent over 50 emails, several to her own family members (including her sister and son) cc to me, stating that her family members support her internet activities 100%, and that her eldest son (Rutger) is “eager” to join in a lawsuit against me, Blogonaut, and others. It is Lynch who involved her family in this very public slow motion meltdown hers, and not me or my client.
8. We were advised by the Treasury Department and the FBI to simply ignore Kelley Lynch, but enough is enough.
Personally, I have had it up to here, and will no longer remain silent about this internet and spam email bully—as mentally disturbed as she obviously is.
–Stephen R. Gianelli
415.929.5130
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
“Kelly Green, how do you know te IRS would be laughed out of court in “any case premised in any way” on my “testimony” where I was figured as a “prominent government witness.”
Ms. Lynch:
It is common sense, which is something you quite obviously lack.
>How many people do you know (other than you) that have reported hundreds of others to the IRS, Justice Department, and others, based on their blog comments?
>How many people do you know (other than you) that CC the IRS and a hundred others when they email their sister or son?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that send as many as 14 emails A DAY to the IRS, and have sent the IRS several THOUSAND emails in the last seversal years?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that write several emails a day for over a year to the same two high profile attorneys who they have never met or talked to, and who do not reply?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that have a $9 million dollar judgment and two harassment restraining orders against them or have been taken against their will to a psychiatric facility?
> How many people do you know (other than you) that share ALL of the above attributes?
Does any of this behavior seem remotely normal to you?
No wonder you fancy yourself to be a credible witness. In your world up is down and down is up.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
“I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people - including you - understand that I am.”
Uh, actually no we do not. We were conveying exactly the opposite understanding.
Any pathology that would allow you to read our above post and come away with that conclusion is truly amazing.
As we said, in your mind, up is down and down is up.
Now if you will excuse us, we are late for a meeting with our other co-conspirators Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
“I have also asked Immigration to investigate why Leonard Cohen abandoned his green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988; why he would obtain a new green card in 1991; and, why DeSouza has not been deported. I have also asked if the District Attorney’s attempts to keep DeSouza in the country can be construed as “witness tampering.””
And you wonder why others think you not credible?
Oh, we forgot. Everyone except for posters on THIS blog thinks you are completely credible. The involuntary psychiatric commitments (plural), the $9 million judgment, the two civil harassment restraining orders, your daily emails to the IRS–all normal signs of a credible witness.
Prosecutions by the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury and Justice Department expected ANY MOMENT!
November 24th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.
2. We know that no federal tax charges have beed filed against
Cohen because we subscribe to Pacer.
3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense. You are a loon, and only the loon does not know it.
4. So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?
E-A-R-T-H T-O K-E-L-L-E-Y L-Y-N-C-H:
When you stop paying your mortagage, the lender (who was not Cohen) forecloses. It is not the dog’s fault, your ex-husbands fault or Cohen’s fault. Law Law Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
We have never stated that we had been “in touch” with Robert Kory or Michelle Blaine.
In approximately June of 2009 and after we heard from your former LA friends who urged us to consider that Lynch was a good person but simply had a serious substance abuse problem, we speculated (in the comments) that perhaps your ex-husband or Cohen might help you with the expenses of rehab.
Hours later you assured us that you had no friends in LA–that your former friends were all addicts and worse.
You later tried to spin this well meaning compasionate comment as a “bribe” to drop the (nonexistant) federal tax case.
You read what you want to read and hear waht you want to hear.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
KELLEY LYNCH ASKS:
“How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me?”
1. With Kelley Lynch as the whistle blower, it s simply a matter of common sense.
2. The fact that over four years later no criminal charges have been filed (all the more so, with each and every passing day) also adds to our hypothesis.
3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,
“I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week - which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”
Good luck, Ms. Lynch. Haaaaha whoooooo whoooo, hahaheeeeee, hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please contact this blog IMMEDIATELY upon ANY response from the IRS or the State of Kentucky expressly stating that Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted, in which event we will hurl ourselves, en masse, from the 17th floor of our building, because the world will surely be coming to an end at that point.
“I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
You are so very amusing, Ms. Lynch, however unwittingly.
But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.
Ergo, unless you read about us and Cohen in the papers in the next few days or weeks, it is you that is, quite possibly, a looooon.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane
date Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:40 PM
subject Re: Alan Jackson - Read Through Phawker’s Blog: It’s A Fascinating Study of Witness Tampering, Phil Spector’s Set Up, And Cohen’s Tax Fraud I Was Told Is Criminal
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 2:40 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the District Attorney’s Office,
He’s all yours.
Kelley Lynch
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Stephen Gianelli - Blogonaut: Witness Tampering, Etc.
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:38 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Proving, time and time again, that this is a game for him.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
ps:
HAHAHAHAHAHHAWhooowhoooooHAAAAAA!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
There’s very little humor in obstruction of justice and witness tampering.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
No, noone could possibly see the humor in Kelley Lynch’s assertions. HAAAHooooHaaaHAHAHA!!!!!!
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,
I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week - which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”
HA-Haaaa–whowhoooo-Haaaaa!!!!
Dear Kelley Lynch:
We will get right on that…HAHAHAHAWhoooohwhooooHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
November 24th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
P.S. You are now “pretending” you’re the IRS and State of Kentucky? You’re quite sick and sadistic really.
November 24th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject:
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:44 PM
HAhaaaaawHOOOOWHOOOHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Have us prosecuted?
Very funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:45 pm
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:45 PM
hahahahahawHOOOOOOOWHOOOOhAAAAhA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:47 pm
HaHaHawhawaaaaWhohooohahaaaaheeeeehahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
Yes, we are unncle sugar now, HEEEEEEEhawhawheeeeheeehoooohoooHAHAHAHAH!!!!!
Yea, you have it right Kelley, by your command Los Angeles prosecutor Alan Jackson will be invesigated by the INS for “witness tampering”, Cohen will bre prosecuted for “tax fraud”, and this blog will be charged with “cyber-terrorism”, “witness tempering”, and other crimes, and you, KELLEY LYNCH, are an “important” government witness.
HAHAHAHAHAWhoooooHoooooHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No, you are not a nut case…
HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Gianelli - Blogonaut,
Sounds about right. Phillip did mention, on public tv, that DeSouza was here illegally and should have been deported. Leslie Abramson seemed to understand the implications. Hopefully, everyone at Immigration’s not stupid.
I never said I’m an important government witness but did email the IRS Commissioner’s Staff last night’s posting about the fact that they will be laughed out of Court and the possibility that I’m a prominent government witness. That will be my honor.
Continue to underestimate me, “nut.”
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 6:56 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
I have no idea if I’m an “important government witness” as you have clearly stated - publicly.
Let’s have a listen to Dave Matthews.
http://www.youtube.com/user/davematthewsband?blend=1&ob=4
I see Immigration is a central issue. I thought the same. In fact, I thought - if Immigration doesn’t do something with respect to DeSouza Phillip is being unduly prejudiced and discriminated against. Most people in DeSouza’s position would have been deported by now. Instead, the District Attorney - from my perspective - has exposed Immigration to extremely serious legal liability. I personally believe Phillip should subpoena Immigration to the witness stand. Who needs federal enemies or unneeded issues? I do not believe, for a moment, that everyone at Immigration is stupid and have seen them in action myself. One thing I noticed - they know liars.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Ode to Kelley Lynch:
Remember Leonard when you ran away
And I got on my knees
And begged you not to leave
Because I’d go berserk?
Well. . .
You left me anyhow, and then you sued
And then the days got worse and worse
And now you see I’ve gone
Completely out of my mind, living in a shelter by day
Blogging by night
Or vice versa
And. . .
They’re coming to take me away, HA HA
They’re coming to take me away, HAHA, Whooohooo
To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all the time
And I’ll be happy to see
Those nice, young men
In their clean, white coats
And they’re coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!
You thought it was a joke
And so you laughed
You laughed when I had said that the IRS should prosecute you
That losing you, lover, would make me flip my lid
Right. . .
You know you laughed, I heard you laugh
You laughed, you laughed and laughed
And then you left, and now you’re rich, so filthy rich
But now you know I’m utterly mad!
And. . .
They’re coming to take me away, HA HA
They’re coming to take me away, HAHA, Whooohooo
To the happy home
With trees and flowers and chirping birds
And basket weavers who sit and smile
And twiddle their thumbs and toes
And they’re coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!
November 24th, 2009 at 7:06 pm
Hopefully, Gianelli, you will be taken away in handcuffs.
Kelley Lynch
November 24th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
For the record, Leonard Cohen was never my lover. Gianelli, however, has clearly flipped his lid.
November 24th, 2009 at 8:10 pm
You make us laugh Kelley Lynch.
Ha-haaa!
November 24th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
“I’m an “important government witness””
hahahahahaha!!!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
Dear Agent Sopko:
Please arrest Blogonaut immediately…Alana Jackson, others too….
HAhahahaWHOOOOOhahaha!
Get it, Please arrest Blogonaut immediately….HAHAHAHAHA!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
“For the record, Leonard Cohen was never my lover”
hahahahahahahawhaaaawha!!!
November 24th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
What does Phillip Spector’s legal status have to do with Kelley Lynch and her insufferable, ego-centric and maniacal rantings about everything but the truth? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. She may have met him in passing at one point in her life; however, if she were truly an important “witness” for the defense, she would have been called to testify in both his trials; and she wasn’t. As a matter of fact, she would never be considered a credible witness for anything, anytime, in any matter. Kelley, you think like a broken record stuck by a crack in the vinyl. You repeat everything over and over again so many times that you are now identified by key phrases - IandmychildrenandmymotherhavebeentargetedbecauseIreportedLeonardCohenfortax fraudthatIwastoldcriminal;PhillipSpectorwassetupbytheLAPDandtheDistrictAttorney;IambeingtargetedbytheLAPDandBoulderPolicefortryingtoreportLeonardCohenthatIwastoldiscriminal…. And on, and on, and on, and on ad nauseam. You are a tired, old and demented poor excuse for a woman and a mother. What a role model you are for your poor children. And save us the crap about Rutger supporting you. You are simply full of crap and need to be put away somewhere to prevent you from further damaging anyone, including yourself.
November 24th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
OK, Kelley, we get it—reading comprehension is NOT your forte.
But I love this: Kelly Lynch/intellectual property—now that’s a classic oxymoron.
November 24th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
But sydney:
Kelley Lynch is also FUNNNNNY!
She now demands that the INS investigate Alan Jackson, and wants Treasury to arrest us for “witness tampering”.
HAHAHAHAHooooohoohawhahahaha!!!!!!
We have not laughed so hard in years.
We are also sure that the IRS, Treasury, and Justice is having a good laugh as well.
November 24th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Poor Phillip. The IRS, DOJ, Immigration, DEA, Etc. should stand firmly behind all of you while an innocent man rots in prison.
Sydney Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
What does Phillip Spector’s legal status have to do with Kelley Lynch and her insufferable, ego-centric and maniacal rantings about everything but the truth? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. She may have met him in passing at one point in her life; however, if she were truly an important “witness” for the defense, she would have been called to testify in both his trials; and she wasn’t. As a matter of fact, she would never be considered a credible witness for anything, anytime, in any matter. Kelley, you think like a broken record stuck by a crack in the vinyl. You repeat everything over and over again so many times that you are now identified by key phrases - IandmychildrenandmymotherhavebeentargetedbecauseIreportedLeonardCohenfortax fraudthatIwastoldcriminal;PhillipSpectorwassetupbytheLAPDandtheDistrictAttorney;IambeingtargetedbytheLAPDandBoulderPolicefortryingtoreportLeonardCohenthatIwastoldiscriminal…. And on, and on, and on, and on ad nauseam. You are a tired, old and demented poor excuse for a woman and a mother. What a role model you are for your poor children. And save us the crap about Rutger supporting you. You are simply full of crap and need to be put away somewhere to prevent you from further damaging anyone, including yourself.
November 25th, 2009 at 2:33 am
Blogonaut/Gianelli - Why would the IRS, Treasury, and Justice be having a good laugh over criminal tax fraud, the destruction of lives, a murder trial set up, immigration fraud, and other crimes? I can understand how “the feds” might have a sense of humor but I tend to doubt they’re cracking up over criminal conduct. Then again, you seem to be their oracle so you might know for certain. You seem to speak for them and are apparently challenging them on the witness tampering issue - which is quite sick actually.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
But sydney:
Kelley Lynch is also FUNNNNNY!
She now demands that the INS investigate Alan Jackson, and wants Treasury to arrest us for “witness tampering”.
HAHAHAHAHooooohoohawhahahaha!!!!!!
We have not laughed so hard in years.
We are also sure that the IRS, Treasury, and Justice is having a good laugh as well.
November 25th, 2009 at 2:39 am
Kelley, you attack others and demand to know why others are speaking for the IRS, FBI, judges, etc. Why do you speak for Phil Spector and his lawyers? Why do you speak for Steven Segal, Oliver Stone, and Ron Burkle?
Just how is Spector “being unduly prejudiced and discriminated against” if DeSouza isn’t deported? And just how has the DA “exposed Immigration to extremely serious legal liability”?
In many of your rants, you go on and on and on insisting the DEA investigate, well, just about anyone who’s ever said anything you didn’t like. Sure, we’re all on drugs. Oh wait—didn’t you demand the DEA investigate your doctors when they would NOT give you drugs? Given your record for invoking the name of the DEA and demanding investigations, what medical professional in his/her right mind would give you anything stronger than an unmedicated bandaid?
November 25th, 2009 at 2:49 am
And on, and on, and on, and on ad nauseam. You are a tired, old and demented poor excuse for a woman and a mother. What a role model you are for your poor children. And save us the crap about Rutger supporting you. You are simply full of crap and need to be put away somewhere to prevent you from further damaging anyone, including yourself.
I haven’t said anything about Rutger supporting me. What’s the interest in Rutger? Intimidation? Witness tampering? Witness retaliation? Harassment?
I see I am a very threatening and credible individual but I won’t be going anywhere and cannot be silenced - hence my emails documenting the destruction of my life copied to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Treasury, FBI, and of course , the Department of Justice since law enforcement told me they were playing a game with me. Direct quote - attributed to Santa Monica PD.
Not sure why we’re so focused on whether or not I’m a “credible witness” and/or possible “prominent government witness.” Perhaps Gianelli-Blogonaut can send me more emails insulting the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - attempting to bait them and insulting them. I thought lying to the FBI was bad enough but throwing “witness tampering” in their face and publicly declaring that they are having a good time as well (at my expense) is really over the top and probably further evidence of criminal conduct including criminal harassment and criminal stalking.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 2:51 am
Gianelli-Blogonaut’s real thoughts on the Phil Spector set up:
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:10 pm
You make us laugh Kelley Lynch.
Ha-haaa!
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
“I’m an “important government witness””
hahahahahaha!!!!!
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
Dear Agent Sopko:
Please arrest Blogonaut immediately…Alana Jackson, others too….
HAhahahaWHOOOOOhahaha!
Get it, Please arrest Blogonaut immediately….HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
“For the record, Leonard Cohen was never my lover”
hahahahahahahawhaaaawha!!!
November 25th, 2009 at 2:54 am
Becareful what you wish for, Kelley.
Let’s pretend there was criminal tax fraud. Who’s going to jail? The guy who may have committed tax fraud or the woman withholding evidence? The woman who vows to soon begin reviewing more evidence? The woman who’s mastered cut and paste? The woman who’ll turn over evidence if and when she wants to?
What sort of trouble could that woman be facing? Criminal obstruction of justice. You see, Kelley, your foolish and childish actions have assured Cohen will walk away without paying one thin dime. When Cohen walks away from this, it’ll be because of your actions—you had to squirrel away all the “precious evidence”—everything that could prove he’s guilty. And then the only one who could possibly be facing charges is you: criminal obstruction of justice. (I hear the federal prison system has “fabulous” mental health facilities.) If you’re really lucky maybe you can get into camp cupcake.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:08 am
The IRS Commissoiner’s Staff, the Treasury agents I met with, and Agent Tejeda/IRS are all aware that there was a tremendous amount of evidence in Rutger’s storage. I now have that evidence and the time to review it. I will be forwarding all of it to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the State of Kentucky, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan. Anyone interested in reviewing the documents should subpoena it from one of these agencies/parties because I will not be keeping copies. I do not have a storage facility and cannot take responsibility for keeping extremely serious evidence safe. We don’t have to “pretend” this is criminal tax fraud. I was told it is criminal tax fraud. Dale Burgess worked for the IRS and seems to know what he was doing and how the IRS works.
Since the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and FBI are well aware that I have evidence which was in Rutger’s storage I tend to doubt this is obstruction of justice. Destroying evidence, which occurred, probably is criminal however. Cohen grabbed evidence illegally from what I can tell. Raoul Felder told me the Sheriff’s Department’s invasion of my home was probably illegal. I believed Mr. Felder who is an excellent attorney and understands the law. I phoned him, and spoke with him, the moment Sergeant Fernandez showed up to take the documents I was sending the IRS Commissioner’s Staff (with Cohen and his legal team’s full knowledge and awareness). Cohen has apparently attempted to obstruct justice, if I follow your logic and apply your rationale, by seizing documents that are indeed evidence and relate to his various social security numbers, immigration issues, tax fraud, off-shore accounts, etc. In any event, the remainder of the evidence is now being sent to the federal agencies that Blogonaut-Gianelli is insulting - about witness tampering, etc.
Green, since you don’t know me and have not reviewed the evidence, etc. what’s your motive for attempting to undermine me - an absolute stranger? Sydney’s on Blogonaut’s Blog about Phil Spector so I’m clear about “its” motive.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 3:20 am
The time has come to officially throw the bullshit flag regarding your trip to “Killer King”.
Let’s review the reasons for the excursion: while you knew your home was surround by SWAT, you decided to exit your home while dressed in a bikini (and escorting your dog); when you were ordered to stop, you jumped into your swimming pool. It’s fortunate neither you nor your dog were shot. Your actions, and your actions alone, caused your committed time out at “Killer King”. I understand the conditions at “Killer King” were deplorable; however, the conditions at “Killer King” didn’t cause your committment—your actions did.
Now here’s where the bullshit flag gets thrown. I’ve got a great life, and I’ve always had the means so I could do anything I wanted. I had the luxury of working as a career ‘medic for 20 years. In those 20 years, I transported at least a thousand 5150 patients. Do you still maintain the cops grilled you for information on Phil Spector? Kelley, no public safety official ever engages a 5150 patient in a conversation. We don’t have to. See every 5150 patient has something to offer—in order to avoid the committment they will say anything. The cops didn’t grill you about Spector—you offered the Spector information because you thought it would get you out of a stay at “Killer King”. You tried to “trade up”. In other words, Kelley, you foolishly thought your info would get you a free pass.
How did that work for you?
November 25th, 2009 at 3:24 am
Green, I have attacked no one. I have documented in emails the destruction of my life and attempted to correct the misinformation and slander on the internet - including this Blog. Is that a defense? YGianelli-Blogonaut is speaking for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler and others because I have spoken about Phil Spector? I most certainly do not speak for Ron Burkle, Oliver Stone, or Steven Segal. They will, however, be called to testify in various matters. Ron Burkle has witnessed this situation since 2005. Oliver Stone was dragged into this by Leonard Cohen who accused me of having sex with him - apparently as some defense to criminal tax fraud allegations. I called Steven Segal from UCLA Harbor when issues about the “IRS” arose. I also phoned Agent Bill Betzer from UCLA Harbor.
Let’s take the ‘prior bad acts” law. DeSouza has apparently perjured himself four times in Immigration documents. This is relevant. Furthermore, Immigration does deport people who commit fraud in Immigration documents and it is of interest, to me, that DeSouza has not been deported. The District Attorney’s communications with Immigration, on behalf of DeSouza, are evidence of their attempts to tamper with a witness who apparently changed his story approximately eight times. In other words, DeSouza has a history of criminal conduct, motive to lie, and is not a credible witness. I think the District Attorney has exposed Immigration to legal liability but that’s for Phil Spector to say for certain. He did raise this as an issue on television. I’m sure we will see what unfolds, legally, with respect to DeSouza’s perjury issues and Immigration.
That’s not true. I don’t like what you are saying or the fact that a mere stranger has motive to slander me and undermine my credibility but I haven’t asked the DEA to investigate you or anyone else for that matter. Forensic science concluded that Clarkson - who mixed vicodin and alcohol - shot herself. The DEA is an independent agency who should review the forensic science and other evidence. Since Clarkson died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound the DEA should investigate whether or not Phil Spector’s life was in danger. This is far more serious than the deaths of Anna Nicole Smith or Heath Ledger because Mr. Spector could have been shot. Diane Ogden’s death of a drug overdose is extremely relevant. She looked high on the witness stand and appeared to be having delusions that there was a “dead girl here” when, in fact, she was not present when Clarkson shot herself.
The DEA can investigate anything about me and my drug history. I personally would invite that. They should feel free to speak to people that know me personally and they should feel free to review all my Brent Air Pharmacy statements and prescriptions. My personal doctor, Dr. Trabulus, was fastidious about giving prescriptions and I only had medication for asthma and my heart condition. I will be more than happy to give the DEA all my medical records without a subpoena. In fact, I would welcome that. They should also feel free to look at my bank statements - which were illegally seized by Cohen’s lawyers and, therefore, available free of charge I would imagine.
Kelley Lynch
P.S.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:33 am
First, I am a sane and rational woman—and you know nothing about sane and rational logic and behavior; therefore, if you want to apply rationale, apply your own twisted logic. You do not speak for me.
Now that I think about, you DONOT have evidence. You may report you have documents, but evidence needs to be given to law enforcers in a timely manner: 5 years is not timely. Well, I’m sure Cohen will be grateful you’ve held his documents in your son’s storgage unit (is there no one you won’t sell-out? Your own son). Everyday you keep the precious documents and don’t turn them over to the feds is another day Cohen gets away with the tax fraud you were told was criminal.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:38 am
Green, the entire Killer King file is falsified. It is Kelly Annette Lynch and not me. The file relates to a 19 year old woman. It is not my social security number, date of birth, religion, place of birth, or my social security number. It is, however, my address and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number. The fact that you are raising it as an issue proves, absolutely - to me, that this was an attempt to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent government witness” for the IRS in any pending matter related to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. That is precisely why I believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team should investigate why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector while Rutger was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Leonard Cohen/Robert Kory - by Steven Clark Lindsey who coordinated a custody matter at the same time and filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that matter. Of course, my younger son witnessed a conversation with Kory about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. The Killer King situation and report cannot be explained.
I was in a bikini because I didn’t realize SWAT would show up. Did the SWAT team roll by because I was in a bikini? This has been suggested. In fact, someone thought SWAT rolled by for a date. I was never ordered to do anything - whatsoever. Good point - an officer told Rutger that both I and my dog would be shot. They also told Rutger that my dog was my hostage and they were taking precautions. Unfortunately, Steven Clark Lindsey was witnessed lying to SWAT and my young son was at the bottom of the hill with Cloris Leachman. There were quite a number of witnesses present for that incident. Dr. D’Angelo did not agree with LAPD so LAPD has very very serious legal issues. My actions did not cause the SWAT team to descend on my home and there is evidence with Neal Greenberg’s lawyers in Colorado that Leonard Cohen, Steven Clark Lindsey, Robert Kory, and Betsy Superfon “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. That is now evidence in a court of law. “The feds” also understand the conditions were deplorable at Killer King. They shut the place down. Steve Cooley must understand, from his office’s Internal Memorandum, that there were serious issues with Killer King as well - including the fact that his Deputy District Attorney questioned the credibility of Luis Pena and felt he would lie and/or cover up for political reasons and/or job security. Pena was the coroner in the Phil Spector matter who testified that he could not disregard the possibility that Clarkson shot herself. I wasn’t committed. I was released.
The cops didn’t grill me about Phil Spector. The cops questioned me about Phil Spector. I guess things were different this time for “public safety” officials and that is an incredibly sweeping statement that I tend to doubt you could prove. It is, no doubt, speculative and really quite superfluous. Actually I didn’t say anything. I asked if I would be in danger and was told, by Erma Oppenhein “this will be good for you.” I refused to speak to the medical personnel at Killer King and that is reflected in the Killer King documents. They lacked any authorization, whatsoever, to treat me. I offered nothing about Phil Spector. I think you’ve watched too much CSI or cop shows - ie., “trade up.” You’re not law enforcement or the District Attorney, are you? I didn’t need a free pass. Dr. D’Angelo didn’t agree with the police officers and promptly released me. The three hour ride to Killer King was a bit bizarre given the fact that UCLA was 8 minutes away.
Kelley Lynch
The cops didn’t grill you about Spector—you offered the Spector information because you thought it would get you out of a stay at “Killer King”. You tried to “trade up”. In other words, Kelley, you foolishly thought your info would get you a free pass.
How did that work for you?
November 25th, 2009 at 3:43 am
Whether or not Lana Clarkson took perscription vicodin did not endanger Spector’s life—the gun HE foolishly kept in a drawer endangered Lana Clarkson’s life—he killed her.
What gives you the authority to decide if Diane Ogden looked high or was delusional while testifying? Neither of us was present in the courtroom; although I did watch her testimony on tv and she neither appeared high or delusional.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:45 am
What’s rational about a person slandering and attacking me who does not know me? What’s rational about your obsession/fixation with me, Phil Spector, and Cohen? You are right about that - I do not speak for you. I do, however, question your motives.
Think what you like. I have evidence and I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff with ample evidence regarding Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Please email the IRS Commissioner’s Staff directly with your concerns about evidence. I spoke to the Treasury agents about this and brought it up with Agent Tejeda/IRS. Does evidence need to be given to law enforcement in a timely manner? How about the evidence Cohen illegally seized that was being sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff? Has that been sent to the IRS? If I wanted to sell anyone out I would have accepted Cohen’s offer of 50% community property - presumably to lie to the IRS and testify that his advisers defrauded him. That’s not what I witnessed so this is evidence that I sold out no one. Please speak to the “feds” about the evidence. Here are their email addresses. I sent the evidence to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff at *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov. Contact them if you would like to review it.
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.go
Kelley Lynch
P.S. And I was also told, by Dale Burgess, that Criminal Intelligence of the IRS should be involved here and that the IRS should be aware that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:52 am
Actually, Bill Pavelic emailed me that Jay Romaine could have testified that the gun Clarkson shot herself with was not his. I believe I have heard other statements that the gun was not Phillip’s. I think the fact that a woman shot herself in Phil Spector’s house - after mixing vicodin and alcohol - is evidence that Clarkson endangered Phil Spector’s life. Additionally, she could have shot him. People who abuse prescription drugs frequently, when high, do not think correctly. Phil Spector didn’t kill Clarkson. She shot herself. That’s why Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden had to be set up - by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit (according to Bill Pavelic). Their message might have driven this point home to the jury. And that’s precisely why I believe the DOJ, FBI, and DEA should speak to Dr. Lee, Dr. Baden, Dr. Spitz, Dr. Pex, and Dr. DeMaio. These agencies should understand forensic science - that concluded this was a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
I have no authority. I just thought Ogden looked high on the stand. She also appeared to be preening for the judge. Please see the Bruce Cutler smack down. In any event, Ogden did die of a drug overdose so it’s not a stretch to conclude that she was high on the witness stand, is it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bOk_TWMQjY
I see - you thought Ogden seemed normal? Then where was the dead girl “here” that she was talking about and why did she have to be “told” to tell the truth?
Kelley Lynch
What gives you the authority to decide if Diane Ogden looked high or was delusional while testifying? Neither of us was present in the courtroom; although I did watch her testimony on tv and she neither appeared high or delusional.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:53 am
P.S. Ogden also stated that she worked for Phil Spector in 1988 and 1989 when I did. That came as a complete surprise to me. I never spoke to her and his calls were forwarded to my house all day every day. I did speak with Janis Zavala Spector frequently though.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:56 am
— On Wed, 11/25/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Garrison Courtney - DEA
To: “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ikeitel@abkco.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, moseszzz@mztv.com
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “Kelley Lynch” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 8:03 AM
Hello Mr. Courtney,
Perhaps the DEA would like to review what’s going on with Phawker.com. There is unbelievable interest in Phil Spector’s matter, Clarkson’s suicide, and - of course - Leonard Cohen’s criminal tax fraud. Blogonaut-Gianelli is happily witness tampering, lying to the FBI, and insulting “the feds.”
All the best,
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 3:57 am
http://www.spike.com/blog/dea-premiere/64236
Garrison Courtney DEA 202-307-2402 Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
November 25th, 2009 at 3:59 am
I’ve never watch CSI and since watching old re-runs of CAR 54, I haven’t watched cop shows. And I’m no fan of cops.
It’s fascinating you report in regards to questions about Spector: “Actually I didn’t say anything.” So you’re saying you NEVER said anything to the cops about Spector while you were enroute to “Killer King”? Well, if you didn’t say anything about Spector, how could you be a potential witness at his trial?
Next time you encounter a cop, firefighter or EMT, ask them when was the last time they engaged a 5150 patient in conversation. You’ll hear groans and chuckles.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:12 am
Green, what is your point? I didn’t think you were a forensic expert. The Phil Spector murder trial, that I am convinced was a set up, was not a “tv show” although I realize (and was told by the DA’s Office) that Alan Jackson was on tv. Perhaps that’s how my Mother noticed that he was a “big phoney.”
That’s right. I didn’t answer any questions Erma Oppenhein asked me about Phil Spector and guns. I have no idea how I was a “probable witness” in the Phil Spector matter. John Thompson, however, will receive a subpoena and can explain why he told me that. I personally didn’t understand how I could be a witness in Phillip’s set up because I didn’t see Clarkson shoot herself. Phillip did and told me that it was devastating to witness - as one might imagine.
I know how a cop will respond when I discuss being taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Officer Garrin called Boulder PD and sent them into Deneuve Construction. That prompted the FBI in Denver to advise me to contact the District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General of Colorado in order to have an investigation done. I did and will subpoena Mary Lacy - former Boulder DA, Chief Mark Beckner, and others to the stand. Be clear about that. That’s why they’re copied in on my emails documenting the fact that corrupt law enforcement and corrupt government officials are all over this story and that’s precisely why I contacted the “FBI.” I did not, however, lie to them. Gianelli did. Proudly apparently.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 4:14 am
P.S. Garrin wasn’t chuckling. He was aggressiveand unprofessional and that’s why I asked him if he thought he was in a detective show. I also filed a complaint about him with LAPD’s Internal Affairs.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:20 am
Regarding evidence being turned over in a timely manner: It’s called the statute of limitations. In regards to criminal matters, and with the exception of murder, the gov’t can only prosecute a crime within somany years after the crime ocurred; in regards to civil torts, a plaintiff can only sue a defendant within so many years - intentional tort (generally 2 years tho sometimes 3 years). Because all the things you want to litigate were intentional torts, the 2 year period has expired; therefore, you will be unable to sue anyone.
Regarding Diane Ogden, I never said she seemed normal; I said she didn’t appear high or delusional.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:27 am
Green, please contact the IRS Commissioner’s Staff directly. I would assume that they understand statutes as they relate to criminal tax fraud. They must also understand how evidence is to be handled and processed. I am glad you realize there are intentional torts here. I am completely uninterested in your legal opinions and suggest you review RICO and its statutes and discovery periods. Here’s a hint: Cohen’s fraudulent judgment, based on perjury, was entered in May 2006. Now - count four years.
Call Ogden abnormal or whatever you like. She appeared to me personally to be high, delusional, and confused. She did die of a drug overdose so she could very well have been high on the witness stand. Most “addicts” need their meds.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:34 am
P.S. Of course I can’t reasonably discover if the IRS believes Cohen committed criminal tax fraud until I have their Opinion or they file a Complaint.
Many people are mistaken that civil RICO claims are not subject to a statute of limitations. True, Congress failed to include a statute of limitations when it passed the RICO Act, but the United States Supreme Court has remedied that oversight and imposed a four-year statute of limitations on all civil RICO claims.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:39 am
P.P.S. This is why I’m waiting for Opinion Letters from the IRS and State of Kentucky. No reasonable person could be asked to “guess” about these complex structures, corporate shams, and egregious tax fraud.
a four-year statute of limitations on all civil RICO claims. Civil Rico’s statute of limitations begins to run when the victim discovers or reasonably should have discovered its injury. Many people also believe that the statute of limitations is reset every time a new criminal act is committed - this is not true. Once a victim is aware or should be aware of its injury, the victim has four years to discover the remaining elements of its claim and bring suit. A victim cannot sit on its rights and refrain from filing suit in the face of known injuries. That being said, however, there are several equitable doctrines that may toll or suspend the running of the statute of limitations. If a defendant fraudulently conceals facts that are essential to the victim’s ability to purse its rights, the running of the statute of limitations may be tolled. In addition, acts of duress, such as “if you sue me, I’ll kill you,” may toll the running of the statute of limitations. All tolling doctrines are based upon whether it is fair, under the circumstances, to bar the victim’s claims on the basis of the running of the statute of limitations. Also, if a defendant engages in a new pattern of rackeeting, that causes new and independent injuries, a new limitations period may apply to those new and independent injuries.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:43 am
Please note: I need a complete and proper forensic accounting and believe Cohen and his advisers are engaging in “fraudulent concealment.’ Clearly I can’t file suit until I have this information which is why Cohen’s garbage perjured fraudulent restraining order, meant to silence me, is nothing other than an IRS matter and also obstruction of justice because I would like the IRS to have that “evidence.” Cohen and his lawyers should be in possession of the Moss Adams due dilgence with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and the intellectual property. CAK undertook due diligence - as did the Grubman Indursky firm.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:46 am
Ms. Green, what’s your position on Cohen withholding “evidence’ - ie., the complete and proper forensic accounting I have repeatedly requested and would like to provide the IRS with? You seem to be an “evidence’ expert. Please do study up on RICO - civil and criminal. Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 4:48 am
Yes, I do agree that some people who abuse perscription drugs, and when high, may not act normally. When alive, a cop can detect whether a suspect is high with the single flicker of flashlight—that’s why cops approach stopped cars with their flashlight in hand.
You make reference to those who could have testified on Spector’s behalf but didn’t. Why didn’t Dr Lee testify? For God’s sake, he’s Dr frickin Lee–his reputation would have survived and any jury would believe him. Why didn’t Dr Baden testify at the second trial? By the time PS2 came around Baden’s wife was long gone; undoubtedly, Baden could define the phrase conflict of interest by PS2. Why didn’t John Thompson testify? Give us a break; if all these people had proof of Spector’s innocence, why didn’t they testify. Are you asking us to believe Spector sits in prison because others were too afraid to testify? Dr Pex testified—and during his testimony the judged had to dismiss the jury and advise Pex of his Miranda rights–Pex perjured himself. Eventhough the judge Mirandized Pex, Pex continued to testify.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:57 am
I see - cops can detect whether someone’s high with a single flicker of a flashlight. They’re see-in-the-dark opthamologists, right? I’m not convinced a jury would buy that but I understand that they also frequently misperceive “bulges” as guns. They usually approach cars with their hand on their guns.
You should write Dr. Lee directly and ask him why. Dr. Lee stated publicly that he might take legal action so we have to see what he decides to do. I can’t imagine him permitting Alan Jackson and others to destroy his reputation and falsely accuse him of crimes like obstruction of justice. That’s a preposterous notion - particularly given his spotless career history. Please write Dr. Baden directly. I cannot answer that. I did find his “Ah Ha” moment revealing. Why would there be a conflict with Dr. Baden and Linda Kenny Baden? That’s preposterous. They are consummate professionals and forensic experts from what I can tel. I have no idea why Investigator John Thompson didn’t testify. He probably didn’t know Phil Spector or witness Clarkson shoot herself.
No. I think Phil Spector’s sitting in prison because he was demonized by gossip and hearsay and highly embellished stories told by witnesses I did not find credible in the least. I believe the jurors wilfully overlooked evidence and have heard that some of them (Juror #9 in the first trial, for instance, with respect to Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations site) they were all over the internet. That’s hearsay but I’m certain it can be investigated and I have no doubt that it will be investigated by Mr. Spector, his legal team, and investigators. I think the incident with Dr. Pex should be investigated by the DOJ and FBI because it appeared to be a “terrorist threat” and unconscionable. Dr. Pex’s response was dead on.
Kelley Lynch
P.S. For someone slandering and trashing me, a total stranger, you certainly are knowledgeable about the Phil Spector murder trial. Why aren’t you familiar with the forensic science?
November 25th, 2009 at 5:01 am
Well, if you didn’t see Diane Ogden’s testimony ( in person or on tv), how could she appear “to be high, delusional, and confused?” You report “she did die of a drug overdose so she could very well have been high on the witness stand.” Sure she was.
Cohen doesn’t have to provide you with a forensic accounting, proper or otherwise. You don’t work for him anymore. You stole everything of his you could get your hands on; and yet, he’s never had you arrested for anything. Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:14 am
Green, see Bruce Cutler’s so-called smack down. Ogden appears to be high. That is my personal opinion and the end of that discussion. It’s relative and subjective and you cannot change my mind. The news media reported that Ogden died of a drug overdose and Phil Spector confirmed this. Do you have evidence proving that she wasn’t hight? I doubt it. Therefore, it will always be in question.
Cohen does have to provide me with a complete and proper forensic accountant. He perjured himself in his legal bullshit in Los Angeles and attached an incomplete and bogus “ledger” which was documented by Dale Burgess after meeting with Cohen’s own accountant - Kevin Prins/Moss Adams - who advised what assets were missing from the accounting. I stole absolutely nothing and Cohen publicly stated that he was not accusing me of theft. He did steal my intellectual property and the corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents prove this. What evidence have you reviewed - or are you relying on fraud and hearsay? Perhaps someone can arrest Cohen for stealing from me. I will note this as a “threat.” Cohen’s attorney can argue whatever he wants. After witnessing these legal antics Cohen should seriously consider proper representation. Most of the evidence was given to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff in 2005 and none of it was altered. Forensic science can prove that as can notarized documents. Other parties were and are in possession of much of this evidence - including Boies Schiller. It was also reviewed by Bert Deixler. How wiould you know what every judge will do? Not every judge is in the District Attorney’s pocket - which is apparently what’s going on with Larry Fidler who appeared to throw two trials for the prosecution. Let’s discuss his insane jury instructions. They caused the jurors to change their minds and they were withdrawn. What do you think Dennis Riordan’s position will be on that matter? No one will ever know if the verdict would have been “not guilty.”
Kelley Lynch
P.S. Your slander is becoming increasingly aggressive.
Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:16 am
Well, Kelley, Spector’s forensic science was laughable. Neither jury bought into it. It really is time for you to let go of PS1. It was a hung jury—and Spector remained free for an extra year. It’s outrageous of you to speculate that the jurors from either trial (specifically juror #9 from PS1) were perusing the internet while serving jury duty. If you had the tiniest speck of eveidence to prove that true, you would have posted it on some website—you wouldn’t be able to help yourself.
Make no mistake, I have neither slandered or trashed you. Your actions speak for themselves.
You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:19 am
Green, I’m not having a “cop” argument with you. That’s correct - I’m not a junkie-addict expert. Never claimed to be. Don’t like to be around them. I’ve noticed they can become monsters and don’t think correctly. The DEA may be experts on junkies and addicts though.
If a cop approaches me with a flashlight he better be on the phone with his lawyer. I view this as a very serious threat and will bring this to the attention of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury. Corrupt law enforcement is all over this story. In any event, I don’t do drugs so the cops will have trouble setting me up.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?
There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:26 am
Green, you don’t have any “corrupt cops” on your payroll that would like to use a “flashlight” on me, do you?
I don’t think Mr. Spector’s forensic science was laughable and that’s why Jackson had to attack the scientists personally. No one believes five expert forensic scientists lied. We don’t know what the verdict would have been. Fidler’s jury instructions essentially juror tampered and changed their minds. I can speculate about anything I want. I think Juror #9 was communicating with Alan Jackson and concluded that based on the speed with which he connected with him immediately following the trial. Paul Huebl, an investigator who attended the trial, thought Juror #9 was on Sprocket’s Blog. Please see his Blog for further details. Phil Spector has extraordinary lawyers and investigators. I have no doubt that he will investigate whether the jurors were perusing the internet. He couldn’t ignore this possibility.
Make no mistake - you have slandered me and your words are now public and will be used in a court of law. Assume anything you want to the contrary. Your interest in Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s trial, and me comes across loud and clear and seems to indicate “motive.” Motive to undermine me as a potential government witness or any type of witness at all.
You’re on the internet. What is this - do as I say, not as I do?
I think we’ll leave the gratuitous Thanksgiving garbage as it is - preposterous after what you have attempted to do to me.
Kelley Lynch
You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:31 am
Green, go prepare your Thanksgiving dinner and sign off as you advised me you were doing. I’m merely documenting the public slander, etc. that I think is definitely witness tampering.
I’m not offering Cohen legal advice. No one is apparently. How can you be positive about anything with respect to Cohen? Did he personally tell you this or have his adviser confirm that Cohen will never take legal advice from me - particularly given the fact that I am not offering it. I hope he ends up in prison - how’s that? He committed what I was told is criminal tax fraud and detroyed my life. I’m positive of that. So are others and they think it’s sick, twisted, and unconscionable. Hopefully he hasn’t altered evidence. He’s certainly done everything else humanly possible in his attempts to cover up his criminal conduct. That is and will always be my personal opinion.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?
There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:35 am
For the record, I don’t decide on topics or subjects. I’m merely documenting all the slander, defamation, libel and the great attention to Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s murder trial, and the destruction of my life - by absolute strangers who seem dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential government witness or any type of witness in the matters we are “discussing.”
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:36 am
By the way, Green, accusing me of altering documents is something you are going to now have to prove.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:43 am
Cohen is going to say I stole documents? He and his lawyer are well aware that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff has been copied in on my emails - documenting the destruction of my life since reporting his tax fraud I was told is criminal - since 2005. They are aware that evidence was sent to the IRS, State of Kentucky, and others. They have been advised to obtain this evidence from the IRS. They are aware that Boies Schiller was in possession of three boxes of evidence. I permitted them to review that evidence and assume they have kept copies. After Cohen’s lawyer issues a subpoena to the IRS we can discuss which documents - specifically - were altered. Providing the IRS with evidence of criminal tax fraud is not “theft” but it sounds like Kory logic. Anyway, Cohen should keep Kory. The altered document argument should prove fascinating.
Kelley Lynch
Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:46 am
I think an obvious question will be: how do you know what Cohen’s lawyer will argue and that he will argue that the documents were stolen and altered. I see the “tax jock” is thinking out the defense.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:50 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:57:45 AM
Subject: Re: The Tax Jock’s Defense: She Altered All The Documents … Including Those With All The Advisers
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Ok. Let’s “pretend” there’s criminal tax fraud with respect to Cohen. Why not? This is so insane.
All the best,
Kelley
Let’s pretend there was criminal tax fraud
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:54:30 AM
Subject: The Tax Jock’s Defense: She Altered All The Documents … Including Those With All The Advisers
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:46 am
I think an obvious question will be: how do you know what Cohen’s lawyer will argue and that he will argue that the documents were stolen and altered. I see the “tax jock” is thinking out the defense.
Kelley Lynch
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:52:06 AM
Subject: Re: What Legal Advice?
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:43 am
Cohen is going to say I stole documents? He and his lawyer are well aware that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff has been copied in on my emails - documenting the destruction of my life since reporting his tax fraud I was told is criminal - since 2005. They are aware that evidence was sent to the IRS, State of Kentucky, and others. They have been advised to obtain this evidence from the IRS. They are aware that Boies Schiller was in possession of three boxes of evidence. I permitted them to review that evidence and assume they have kept copies. After Cohen’s lawyer issues a subpoena to the IRS we can discuss which documents - specifically - were altered. Providing the IRS with evidence of criminal tax fraud is not “theft” but it sounds like Kory logic. Anyway, Cohen should keep Kory. The altered document argument should prove fascinating.
Kelley Lynch
Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:44:56 AM
Subject: Re: What Legal Advice?
From: Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:36 am
By the way, Green, accusing me of altering documents is something you are going to now have to prove.
Kelley Lynch Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:43:52 AM
Subject: What Legal Advice?
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:35 am
For the record, I don’t decide on topics or subjects. I’m merely documenting all the slander, defamation, libel and the great attention to Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s murder trial, and the destruction of my life - by absolute strangers who seem dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential government witness or any type of witness in the matters we are “discussing.”
Kelley Lynch
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:39:34 AM
Subject: The Altered Documents Argument Should Be Good
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:31 am
Green, go prepare your Thanksgiving dinner and sign off as you advised me you were doing. I’m merely documenting the public slander, etc. that I think is definitely witness tampering.
I’m not offering Cohen legal advice. No one is apparently. How can you be positive about anything with respect to Cohen? Did he personally tell you this or have his adviser confirm that Cohen will never take legal advice from me - particularly given the fact that I am not offering it. I hope he ends up in prison - how’s that? He committed what I was told is criminal tax fraud and detroyed my life. I’m positive of that. So are others and they think it’s sick, twisted, and unconscionable. Hopefully he hasn’t altered evidence. He’s certainly done everything else humanly possible in his attempts to cover up his criminal conduct. That is and will always be my personal opinion.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?
There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:35:38 AM
Subject:
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:16 am
Well, Kelley, Spector’s forensic science was laughable. Neither jury bought into it. It really is time for you to let go of PS1. It was a hung jury—and Spector remained free for an extra year. It’s outrageous of you to speculate that the jurors from either trial (specifically juror #9 from PS1) were perusing the internet while serving jury duty. If you had the tiniest speck of eveidence to prove that true, you would have posted it on some website—you wouldn’t be able to help yourself.
Make no mistake, I have neither slandered or trashed you. Your actions speak for themselves.
You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:19 am
Green, I’m not having a “cop” argument with you. That’s correct - I’m not a junkie-addict expert. Never claimed to be. Don’t like to be around them. I’ve noticed they can become monsters and don’t think correctly. The DEA may be experts on junkies and addicts though.
If a cop approaches me with a flashlight he better be on the phone with his lawyer. I view this as a very serious threat and will bring this to the attention of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury. Corrupt law enforcement is all over this story. In any event, I don’t do drugs so the cops will have trouble setting me up.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?
There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:26 am
Green, you don’t have any “corrupt cops” on your payroll that would like to use a “flashlight” on me, do you?
I don’t think Mr. Spector’s forensic science was laughable and that’s why Jackson had to attack the scientists personally. No one believes five expert forensic scientists lied. We don’t know what the verdict would have been. Fidler’s jury instructions essentially juror tampered and changed their minds. I can speculate about anything I want. I think Juror #9 was communicating with Alan Jackson and concluded that based on the speed with which he connected with him immediately following the trial. Paul Huebl, an investigator who attended the trial, thought Juror #9 was on Sprocket’s Blog. Please see his Blog for further details. Phil Spector has extraordinary lawyers and investigators. I have no doubt that he will investigate whether the jurors were perusing the internet. He couldn’t ignore this possibility.
Make no mistake - you have slandered me and your words are now public and will be used in a court of law. Assume anything you want to the contrary. Your interest in Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s trial, and me comes across loud and clear and seems to indicate “motive.” Motive to undermine me as a potential government witness or any type of witness at all.
You’re on the internet. What is this - do as I say, not as I do?
I think we’ll leave the gratuitous Thanksgiving garbage as it is - preposterous after what you have attempted to do to me.
Kelley Lynch
You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:52 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:59:26 AM
Subject: Cohen and Kory Have Been Advised To Subpoena All Evidence From The IRS
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
I believe I have been clear about this.
All the best,
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 11:14 am
Fortunately, the documents are largely supported by the corporate indexes. Unfortunately, for Mr. Illiterate they are not “altered.”
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 11:17 am
Ms. Lynch
Leonard Cohen is an entertainer, when we enter a site on the internet to read a review of an entertainer, we do not expect to read some crazy lunatic crap about that person written by a disgruntled former employer, “lover” or whatever.
You write inappropriate stuff in inappropriate places on the web, you spill out all your private grievances including your financial problems, various sexual fantasies, your homeless situation, your children’s involvement in your pathetic situation, your children’s and sibling’s names, your friendship with a convicted killer, you write horrible, cruel peronal things about the entertainer in question and his family, and then you get furious when readers and bloggers disagree with you and argues with your craziness, accuses us of being on drugs and having “motives for disputing your accusations because (your words) “Why should strangers be interested in Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud and Phil Spector’s murder trial”. Most of us are not interested, but you barge in on places where you have no bussiness with your nonsense.
What did you expect Ms. Lynch? That people who read your rantings will respond with “Oh thank you so much Ms. Lynch for enlightening us and telling us the truth about Leonard Cohen, you sound so credible and sane and we absolutely believe that you have been victimized by this horrible man, and yes it really does sound like Phil Spector is innocent and it is probably Leonard Cohens fault that he is rotting in jail, and yes it is absolutely Leonard Cohen fault that you live in a homeless shelter and that your son lost his finger. Let us all join you in your effort to get this man arrested and destroy his life the way he has destroyed yours”
Well it should have entered your mind by now that that will NEVER happend, you will NEVER get anybody to “see it your way, you will never succeed in what you call “correcting slander and lies and undermining your credibility” by lying and slandering others.
Whatever deserved or undeserved, the fact is that you lost your job, your house, your money and the lifestyle you had become accustomed to, but you know what? The same thing has happend to a lot of other people all over the world in the last few years. People cope with it in different ways, but most sane and normal people will start to rebuild their lives and go on. Not Kelley Lynch, she decided five years ago that she was going to dedicate the rest of her life to being a victim, to just let herself go to the dogs (and bring her family down with her) and blame everybody else for her missery.
I believe the internet has several support groups and blogs for fired or displaced managers. You should check them out, they will be more suitable for you than entertainment blogs and you may find more sympathy and understanding there.
Susanne
November 25th, 2009 at 11:19 am
To Phawker, Sidney, Kelly Green, “Blogonaut”
My best wishes for a Happy Thanksgiving.
Susanne
November 25th, 2009 at 11:56 am
Kelley, you are a sad and pathetic joke. You contradict yourself over and over and over again. You write the same words every time you post and not one person has ever responded to support you. Doesn’t that tell you something? The only responses you get are from people who see through your lies, slander and libel and confront you on your own criminal behavior. You don’t have any evidence about anything. If you did, you would already have been to court and had your trial. Five years of public slander and libel have not gotten you one iota of retribution. Five years of “poor me”; five years of being obsessed with Leonard Cohen; five years of wasting every single day, all day, on web-sites making threats, and besieging others with unwanted emails; and five years of making a fool of yourself. Now you have involved your son by announcing that all your so-called evidence is being stored in his storage unit. Real nice, Kelley. What kind of mother would incriminate her own son? An abusive one would; a mother who does not love her son would. What a waste of flesh you are, Kelley Lynch. You can’t go any lower than this. Shame on you Kelley Lynch. Shame on you.
November 25th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Thanks, Susanne. Happy Thanksgiving to you also. I know what I’d be most thankful for, but that’s not going to happen.
November 25th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Yes Sidney I know, me too
November 25th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Walsh and Sydney, your Thanksgiving greetings to one another are nauseatingly touching - particularly in the context of a murder trial set up, criminal tax fraud, and the destruction of my life. That’s right, Sydney, I write the same words over and over - and, I will point out again, am merely correcting all of the lies on this Blog - and others. How could a stranger see through anything particularly when they have not reviewed the evidence in what I am now referring to as the “Leonard Cohen Criminal Tax Fraud Matter.” I haven’t committed any crimes but do wonder why Cohen hasn’t been arrested and prosecuted for his obvious crimes. That would include - criminal tax fraud (that was confirmed by my professional advisers), perjury, theft, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, wiitness intimidation, witness retaliation, fraud, intentional torts, and it goes on and on - from my perspective. As I like to say - he’s one hell of a “folksinger.’ I’m not obsessed with Cohen. I could care less about Cohen as I have said repeatedly. What I am focused on are his actions - visa vis me and my family members - including children. I think there’s ample evidence, right here on this Blog, that I have been besieged - by strangers keenly interested in Phil Spector’s matter, Cohen’s tax fraud matter, and - apparently - witness tampering with a potential government witness and seeing that the IRS is potentially laughed out of Court. I think people have every right to insult the IRS but I do not think they have a right to undermine or obstruct a potential criminal prosecution. There is nothing funny about that - particularly after what has gone on here.
Just because you just learned that there “was” evidence in Rutger’s storage space does not mean that this hasn’t been addressed for a number of years publicly. Agent Sopko-Treasury and Agent Tejeda-IRS are well aware of this. The IRS is well aware of this. I brought it to the attention of Phil Spector and his legal team - after all, it appears that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phillip’s grand jury and he now has a “pattern” of perjury, obstruction of justice, etc., from what I can tell. In fact, if he merely “lied” to the detectives I met at his house that is obstruction of justice in a murder trial and no small matter. But that’s not the case if Mick Brown was correct when he emailed me that Cohen testified in Phil Spector’s grand jury. He changed his story - unless the District Attorney was attempting to prove that the stories about Phillip were good rock ‘n roll comments/stories - which they were. Many, many people have made careers and money using Phil Spector and the de riguer “gun” story. Fortunately, Marky Ramone corrected the fabricated and embellished stories about Phillip and rightly pointed out that George Brand would have had the gun as he would have served as Phillip’s body guard. The same would be true for Jay Romaine, former LAPD Homicide Detective, who apparently (according to Bill Pavelic) could have testified that the gun was not Phil Spector’s.
I am reviewing the evidence now so Rutger is no longer involved with the situation. If anyone wants to subpoena it they should contact the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. I have also mailed evidence to the IRS Commissoiner’s Staff and Agent Sopko and her partner confirmed that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff received what I mailed them and were reviewing my emails. Apparently a number of people are “reading” them. I’m assuming they are not illiterate and I am assuming that Cohen’s defense will be that he is illiterate. I’ve also included Agent Tejeda’s phone number. For all those interested in any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen for his tax fraud (that I was told is criminal) please contact Agent Tejeda directly.
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20224
Agent Luis Tejeda
300 N. Los Angeles Street
MS 4040
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 576-3797
My son has now been incriminated because he stored documents for me - with everyone’s knowledge, awareness, and understanding. I believe Cohen’s legal advisers are well aware of this also and they have absolutely been told that they should subpoena all evidence from the IRS.
Sydney, head back over to Blogonaut’s Phil Spector Appeal Watch and post some more nonsense there.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 11:56 am
Kelley, you are a sad and pathetic joke. You contradict yourself over and over and over again. You write the same words every time you post and not one person has ever responded to support you. Doesn’t that tell you something? The only responses you get are from people who see through your lies, slander and libel and confront you on your own criminal behavior. You don’t have any evidence about anything. If you did, you would already have been to court and had your trial. Five years of public slander and libel have not gotten you one iota of retribution. Five years of “poor me”; five years of being obsessed with Leonard Cohen; five years of wasting every single day, all day, on web-sites making threats, and besieging others with unwanted emails; and five years of making a fool of yourself. Now you have involved your son by announcing that all your so-called evidence is being stored in his storage unit. Real nice, Kelley. What kind of mother would incriminate her own son? An abusive one would; a mother who does not love her son would. What a waste of flesh you are, Kelley Lynch. You can’t go any lower than this. Shame on you Kelley Lynch. Shame on you.
November 25th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Re: Kelley Lynch’s admission that Cohen’s corporate “indexes” are stored in Lynch’s son Rutger Penick’s storage room
Prior to Kelley Lynch’s eviction from her Los Angeles home, Cohen’s attorneys served Lynch with a COURT ORDER commanding Lynch to turn over to Cohen all of Cohen’s corporate books and records.
The Los Angeles police did the actual searching and box after box of Leonard Cohen’s property was recovered from Lynch’s home—including Cohen’s passport. (The home was so unkempt with and unsanitary the police had to wear rubber gloves to search.)
Lynch was very angry and hostile, screaming that the many boxes recovered were “evidence”.
If in fact Kelley Lynch (as seh admits here) failed to turn over to Cohen all of the books and records pertaining to Cohen’s business affairs, Kelley Lynch is in violation of yet another court order—and so is Rutger Penick if he is concealing those records for her.
It would appear that Kelley Lynch has once again opened her mouth and inserted her foot.
PS Happy Thanks Giving to all.
November 25th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
And she just digs herself in deeper and deeper and deeper. You’re right, Blogonaut, this has become funny. She has gotten so bizarre that all one can do is laugh. I’ve never encountered someone so hell-bent on self-destruction before. Reason and logic are so foreign to her, she can’t see the damage she’s doing to herself. Sooner or later this will end up in court (probably at a sanity hearing) and then there will be concrete proof of all her lies, slander and libel. In the meantime, Happy Thanksgiving Blogonaut.
Happy Thanksgiving to you too, Kelley. You really should look around yourself and see if there is anything left of your life to be thankful for.
November 25th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Leonard Cohen’s an entertainer? That’s rich. I passed up a first class trip to Paris just to avoid watching him play. Of course, he couldn’t stop talking about all the dignitaries that came to see him. The best thing to do at a Leonard Cohen concert, as Peter Lubin - Giant Merchandising, and I discussed was to go out to dinner. Which is precisely what we did.
Walsh, look at the heading on this Blog thread. It is not dedicated to Cohen’s “entertainment” and there has been nothing entertaining about the targeting of my family and destruction of my life. This Blog’s thread is entitled “Leonard Cohen Is Not A Great Man.” Therefore, my comments are utterly in context and appropriate.
I was not Cohen’s employee. And I certainly was not this creep’s lover. I can assure you that I don’t have sexual fantasies about men like “Pat Dixon” who I view as a criminal that helped set Phil Spector up. Are we clear about that? Blogonaut-Gianelli may have sexual fantasies about Dixon and he may want to hang around with him and other prosecutors but I would rather die personally. If Pat Dixon believes I have sexual fantasies about him then I have successfully proven that Pat Dixon is delusional and deranged - and really creepy and nasty.
Excuse me for raising the “homeless” issue. Had Cohen paid me what he owed me and not stolen millions from me (”the intellectual property”) I wouldn’t have to bore you with my “homeless” tales. If this is all so monotonous and tedious for you, Walsh, why are you so obsessed and fixated on me. I noticed you were on my Blog twice already this morning. Perhaps you feel like you are a celebrity and this is your moment to shine.
Cohen’s lawyer filed a Declaration in my son’s custody matter. Cohen targeted Rutger and my parents. Cohen should be held accountable for his actions - including his tax fraud that I was TOLD is criminal which may explain why the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and the FBI are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life. Nothing else would explain that. I have no friends or acquaintances at these agencies and I am certain there are intelligent people who know how to ask someone they feel is behaving frivolously or inappropriately to cease and desist - that would include Agent Sopko who is still copied in and has not (as Joff Belark wrote me) advised me to stop writing her. Any logical and/or rational person can conclude that there will probably be a federal criminal prosecution.
I have not accused you of being on drugs. Do not attempt to twist my words. I asked you if you hit the crack pipe and everytime I read your comments and other comments - specifically the insanity with Gianelli-Blogonaut here and via emails to me yesterday - I am wondering if he, you, and others are unstable and/or on drugs. If not, this is a game of witness tampering and it is deadly serious and shameless. Blogonaut-Gianelli (who, based on his postings from Blogonaut vs. Gianelli, appears to be “schizophrenic) appears to be baiting and taunting the IRS, Department of Justice, and others. I continue to believe that he should be investigated and that is final. His communications with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson absolutely demand an investigation and their computers should be seized - in order to confirm how extensively they were communicating and whether or not Gianelli-Blogonaut did indeed find a sympathetic ear with Jackson by intentionally trashing me, slandering me, and attempting to undermine me as a potential prominent government witness. Jackson, a government prosecutor, should understand “witness tampering” better than anyone but he’s not involved with the law. He has engaged in a set up of an innocent man and I want to know if he was involved in having me taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Of course, I want to know who falsified the entire Killer King report. Everyone would want to know this and to say otherwise is absurd. In fact, it freaks people out and horrifies people who are not playing a game but are firmly grounded in reality and have a healthy appreciation that government corruption exists - as does police misconduct and corruption. Please take a look at the FBI’s website. They address official misconduct and the serious ramifications of corrupt officials.
I can assure you that I didn’t barge in on this Blog. I read the article on Phawker and addressed certain issues in that article. Phawker posted my response and has clearly stated on their Blog that they respect freedom of speech. My comments to this Blog were attacked, immediately, by you - Walsh, Another Kelly Lynch Victim, more of your posts Walsh, Kelly Green, Blogonaut Law Blog, Stephen R. Gianelli (immediately threatening my son, sister, and brother-in-law with retaliation), Sydney, Kelly PLZ Face Reality (who understands I am a potential prominent government witness and seems dead set on attempting to have the IRS laughed out of Court in a deadly serious criminal tax fraud matter where countless government resources have been wasted), Kelly Give Us A Break, and Webber. Unfortunately, people cannot seem to spell my name.
People are free to disagree with me. The only reason I am posting here or communicating with any of you is because you are liars and I am addressing your lies, slander, defamation, libel, and worse.
You have repeatedly targeted me and you descended. It didn’t happen the other way around although I have posted my views on Phil Spector which seriously disturbs people.
It is irrelevant to me what you believe. I believe you are either idiots or criminals. And that’s putting my personal opinions mildly. Gianelli-Blogonaut writing me “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” on this Blog and via emails is seriously disturbed activity.
I never said it was Leonard Cohen’s fault that Phillip is rotting in prison - innocent. I said that if Mick Brown/UK Telegraph told me the truth when he wrote and said Cohen testified in Phillip’s grand jury that it’s probably perjury. He did, after all, tell the detectives (and me for approximately 20 years) that his comments were good rock ‘n roll comments and he hated his vocals. Cohen didn’t taser Phillip a number of times and he is not the District Attorney with the power, resources, and motive to “nail” an innocent celebrity. It’s an LA Sport.
My son’s friends think Rutger lost his fingers because of the situation we found ourselves in. He would have been in college. Cohen and Lindsey owe me a tremendous amount of money and I personally hold them responsible for this. They can think what they like. I know them and they are both con artists and liars.
You, Walsh, do not speak for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury and, therefore, you cannot say whether or not Cohen will be prosecuted. It is preposterous and absurd to think otherwise. Everyone I talk to thinks Cohen should be prosecuted and Phil Spector’s innocent but please think otherwise if you so choose. I don’t just call this correcting lies and slander. That is what I’m doing. I am not interested in communicating with a bunch of maniacs for fun.
I didn’t hvae to lose my house, lifestyle or - most importantly - custody of my son. All I had to do was accept Cohen’s offer of 50% community property (please keep in mind that Dale Burgess witnessed this offer and asked me to inform the IRS and Treasury that he will testify to that fact … I called him immediately after the Treasury agents left because we discussed this) - presumably to lie and say Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. A preposterous, absurd, ridiculous, and delusional position. I am also convinced there may be insurance fraud or an attempt to defraud an insurance company here. Sure, Walsh: a sane person whose life has been targeted and whose children’s lives were destroyed and who were targeted would just ignore this and light a joint and go on their merry delusoinal way.
I decided in the fall of 2004 that I was going to pay all the taxes Dale Burgess told me I owed and report Cohen’s tax fraud that I was TOLD is criminal to the IRS. The moment my lawyer’s advised me that they wanted to figure in a settlement amount for my “exposure” to criminal tax fraud was the moment I realized that not only was this criminal there appeared to be some type of plan and or people had conspired to keep this from coming to the attention of the IRS. After all, Boies Scihller and others advised me that only 1% of these types of situations are brought to the attention of the IRS. I understand why and so do others - most people have advised me that I should have taken the millions I was offered, made a deal, and lived my comfortable existence with my wonderful children. Cohen, Lindsey, and others had different plans for me - including, according to Neal Greenberg’s lawsuit in Denver, conspiring to have me falsely arrested. That refers to the SWAT/Killer King incident and that, as I’ve stated, relates to Phil Spector. Obviously, this will be a key issue for Mr. Spector but one step at a time. He has the set up to deal with first and probably has to address bond. Clearly he’s not dangerous and his neighbor, who felt he was set up, is sad that Mr. Spector is in prison and not producing music as he should be. Phil Spector should be a free man. Period.
I can assure you that I’m not “blaming” everybody for my misery and that’s a gratuitious remark - as are so many of the comments here.
I believe I have consulted with a criminal attorney who I am keeping closely apprised of everything that is unfolding. He is a RICO expert and a litigator and that is precisely what I need.
I can assure you that I’m not looking for sympathy here and that’s quite a twisted point of view. I have stated, for the record, that I am correcting misinformation, lies, slander, fraudulent allegatoins, etc. - and that would include the allegation raised last night that I altered documents. That will have to be proven in a court of law now. To think otherwise is foolish and truly sophomoric.
Kelley Lynch
“That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.”
“Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”
Quotations posted by Kelly PLZ Face Reality
November 25th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Blogonaut/Gianelli, for a lawyer you certainly do not pay attention to details. The corporate indexes were emailed to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff in 2005. They were filed as attachments to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s garbage attempt to silence me. I have stated, very clearly, that I am now reviewing the documents and there is no need to discuss where I previously stored them. Cohen had the Sheriff’s Department invade my house and the Document Request that I declined to answer (instead choosing to inform the IRS Commissioner’s Staff that I would send everything to them) addressed documents relating to Cohen’s numerous social security numbers, green card insanity, off-shore accounts, gifts to Dominique Issermann from the off-shore accounts. I never heard from Cohen after the Sheriff’s invasion that Raoul Felder told me was probably illegal - with respect to documents so this is obviously a moot point. Cohen can and should contact the IRS Commissioner’s Staff if he and/or his legal team want to review what I’ve sent them. My email accounts have been targeted and shut down so I cannot even say, with any degree of certainty, what the IRS may now be reviewing. I know the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading certain documents but I’m not sure I can say that they were reviewing evidence with an eye towards a federal criminal prosecution. Maybe they’re just bored and need something to read. That’s your position, right?
The Los Angeles police did not search my house and I do not recall letters from Bob Dylan as has been publicly stated on the internet. Bob Dylan should personally address that matter. The Sheriff’s Department seized documents - including mine relating to Traditional Holdings, LLC, Blue Mist Touring Company, etc. and hopefully they have proper legal representation - particularly as Raoul Felder, an excellent attorney, felt the search and seizure was probably “illegal.” The police did not wear rubber gloves to search and Sergeant Fernandez should speak for himself. Have you been in touch with him? I did ask him if the State of California was assisting Cohen with his tax fraud. I suppose if you think a “flood” is unkempt then there was a section of my home that flooded and I did have to move papers/evidence (for the IRS). It was not unsanitary. They also were not, as Fernandez publicly informed me, on private property.
Actually, for the first time in my life I called someone a “cunt.” That someone is Michelle Rice who Chad Knaak thought was attempting to intimidate me. Chad didn’t think it worked. He witnesed the situation. I also called Agent Betzer/IRS to explain what was going on - as I did previously and following that. I don’t recall screaming. I thought Fernandez was a shameless madman who was upsetting my son and other teenagers - including Katie whose Mother had just been “murdered.” Real nice job. Someone’s got to do it. There’s always some shameless thug willing to intimidate innocent people so the system works well for the criminals. Ultimately, Fernandez advised me that he didn’t see the “gigalo” Cohen accused me of having.
I failed to turn over nothing. The Sheriff’s Department searched my house and they took what they felt belonged to Cohen. Cohen never followed up to say anything else was missing and I own 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC, 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., and was illegally “given” 99.5% of LC Investments, LLC. Cohen, through Greenberg, Glusker, was given copies of the Traditional Holdings, LLC and Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. corporate books and the original LC Investments, LLC corporate books. I didn’t pay my lawyers to index the documents for Cohen but I see that the greedy illterate folksinger from hell still hates legal fees.
I am noting your allegation about Rutger. Nothing was concealed and if you think I won’t address this in court, and attempt to have you disbarred, you truly are as deranged and unstable as I think you are. Your lunacy yesterday speaks for itself.
Au contrare, Blogonaut-Gianelli, it is you who have backed yourself into a legal positoin that I feel you will never recover from. You are clearly witness tampering, all over the Cohen matter and defending him and you did state publicly that you were in touch with his advisers, intent on lying about me and slandering me, undermining my credibility as a witness, all over Phil Spector’s matter, and were communicating - at least once - with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson which I can assure you Phil Spector is taking seriously. You’re a lawyer, right. Do you actually believe that Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan aren’t interested in your lies to the FBI, call to Investigator William Frayeh about his remark that Pat Dixon was “good looking,” attempts to have LAPD and Boulder PD target me again, intimidation and threats with respect to my son Rutger (who David Moorhead thought was a “material witness” for Phil Spector), and - most importantly - your communication or communications with Alan Jackson. Investigator Frayeh did advise me that he thought you found a sympathetic ear with Jackson - as did I.
Don’t drink too much wine. It might make you sloppy. You don’t pay attention to detail in any event and your arrogance prevents you from seeing your glaring crimes. These are my personal, unshakeable positions and thoughts. I am also convinced that you should be charged, arrested, and prosecuted for the reasons I have previously stated. Call Agent Wynar/FBI and quote me. I’ve already let him know how I feel.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
Sydney, there is nothing funny about this situation. Blogonaut-Gianelli’s emails to me yesterday were forwarded to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - as were the comments on this Blog which include threats (veiled and not so veiled) against me and my son who is a witness. There is nothing bizarre about me. And now that I understand, and it has been clearly set forth on this Blog, that people are having fun tampering with a potential “prominent government witness” and attempting to undermine any pending IRS prosecution of Cohen and others, I no longer have to question motive. It’s been clearly stated.
I will end up in court and it will not be at a sanity hearing. Gianelli-Blogonaut, after yesterday’s postings and emails to me, might want to seek help for himself.
This Blog contains concrete proof and evidence of all of your lies, slander, and libel. That’s why I am here correcting it and documenting it.
I have plenty to be thankful. This year I’ll give thanks for the fact that I will never have to be in the presence of Leonard Cohen or Steven Clark Lindsey again in my lifetime. If we’re in court together I will ask the court to separate us based on what they have done to my life, my children’s lives, and my parent’s lives. I will also give thanks for the fact that Rutger is a wonderful young man and supportive - who has been through an unconscionable ordeal, lost his fingers, and has risen to the challenge of moving on with his life - while being threatened and retaliated against because he is absolutely a witness.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 2:17 pm
Ha! You never cease to amaze and to amuse us Kelley Lynch.
You just posted (above), just hours ago, that the corporate indexes were in your son’s storage.
We were simply pointing out that if that is true you are in violation of the court order served on you at your Los Angeles residence. and as you well know, the Los Angeles Superior Court judgment that Cohen obtained against you in May of 2005 expressly finds that you have no equitable ownership interest in any of the Cohen related entities you reference. This judgment was characterized in 2008 by a Colorado federal court judge as a “final and binding” adjudication of Cohen’s exclusive ownership of those entities and that any interest that you had was simply to hold Cohen’s interest as a “trustee”.
And no, Ms. Lynch, we do not mean “trustee” in the formal sense, but in the sense that anyone who holds property as the agent of another is a “trustee”.
I realize that you disagree with these findings and the money judgment against you. However, that case has been finally adjudicated, and from a legal standpoint final and binding on you.
BTW, Raoul Felder is a divorce lawyer, and in any event off the cuff opinions of attorneys that you talked to in passing (which you love to twist to suit your purposes) is hardly a definitive legal opinion.
Last, stating opinions on a public bulletin board concerning a discussion you publicly initiated and obviously relish is not federal crime, and none of the federal law enforcement authorities you reference care a wit about your ridiculous accusations of “witness tampering”, “obstruction of justice” and “cyber-terrorism” that you serially spew forth against all who post opinions different than yours. We know, we have talked to two of them, including your Agent Sopko.
November 25th, 2009 at 2:24 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, you’re not threatening and attempting to intimidate Rutger because Steven Clark Lindsey asked him to go into Kory’s office and sign documents transferring my house to Cohen/Kory, are you? Since you’re a lawyer you have to admit that Phil Spector and his legal team are interested in this situation. After all, as this conversation was taking place I was being taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. I know you like to avoid this part of the story - and everything that is relevant, factual, and true. That is precisely why I am convinced that you are willfully and gleefully witness tampering, etc., lying to the FBI, and attempting to sabatoge a possible pending federal criminal prosecution of Cohen for his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. As you yourself wrote yesterday - this might annoy the IRS who might, in turn, prosecute you and others for what you are engaged in. That confirms that it is intentional.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
I know you are gleefully enjoying yourself - witness tampering, lying about me, slandering me, attempting to undermine a potential “prominent government witness,” lying to Agent Wynar-FBI, attempting to determine - through Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko - if there actually is a federal prosecution against Cohen pending, attempting to intimidate and threaten my son, and - obviously - attempting to sabatoge any pending IRS matter. I’ve noted, for the record, your gleeful, psychotic posts and emails to me from yesterday.
Show me the quote where I said the corporate indexes were in my son’s storage and I’ll concede the point. The corporate indexes are attached to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s garbage attempt to silence me in Boulder, Colorado and I brought this to Joff Belark and your attention prior to the appearance of the lie disguised as an article was “published” on your Blog - with the intent to slander me and undermine my character (no doubt as a “witness”).
Why are you pointing this out to me? Point it out to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. You have their email and have contacted Agent Sopko personally - apparently to advise her that I’m spamming her which she has not advised me. Cohen perjured himself and I have stated very clearly my legal position. I am also consulting with a criminal attorney and litigator and will follow his legal advice - not yours particularly as I personally am convinced that you are engaged in criminal conduct and your motive is overwhelmingly obvious. I wasn’t a trustee so it would be impossible for me to hold anything as a trustee. Pesky detail, I know. In any event, I have asked the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the State of Kentucky for their Opinions on these and other issues and have absolutely no interest, whatsoever, in your opinion. Not one other attorney, and I’ve spoken with great attorneys, have advised me that Cohen’s default judgment was binding. They were, however, extremely interested in the jurisdiction, perjury, fact that I was not served, and the fraud. Perjury and fraud are binding on the perpetrator. In this instance, and probably Phil Spector’s grand jury, that would be Leonard Cohen - the folksinger from hell.
I didn’t talk to Raoul Felder in passing. Sergeant Fernandez witnessed that conversation and I have twisted nothing. I think Raoul Felder is actually a constitutional scholar and was friends with his brother, Doc Pomus, because of Phillip. I see you think you’re an actual lawyer but men like Raoul Felder are merely divorce lawyers. That tells me, as usual, that you are an arrogant idiot. Raoul Felder told me that the seizure of documents was probably illegal. Boies Schiller seemed to believe the same and documents were filed against Cohen to that effect. My own attorney will address that issue and you can analyze his arguments at that time.
Witness tampering is a federal crime. I have said enough about this issue and am not interested in your excuses. I believe you have motive and I believe you are dead set on undermining me as a potential government witness and sabataging any pending IRS prosecution of Cohen. It’s very very obvious and very very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Tresaury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper? Your conversations with Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar become increasingly elaborate. How would you know what federal agencies feel? You do not speak for them - although I know you think you do.
You’re fighting a losing battle. Just a head’s up.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Kelley Lynch you are not correcting any misinformation, lies, slander or fraudulent allegations etc. in your postings, you are just reinforcing your own lies, slander, misinformation and fraudulent allegations.
There are people who spend their entire life hoping they will be multy-millionaires playing Lotteries, they have a better chance than you have in getting Leonard Cohen in and Phil Spector out of prison.
Yes, I do check your nutty blog, just keep in mind, when it is morning in your world it is almost night in mine.
November 25th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
For the record, Agent Sopko is not my own. I realize this is really a dig at Agent Sopko - even if she and Agent Wynar don’t.
Kelley Lynch
We know, we have talked to two of them, including your Agent Sopko.
November 25th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Walsh, I can assure you that you do not speak for me. You may intuitively speak for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan but do not speak for me or assume anything. I am correcting lies and misinformation and slander. You have not reviewed any evidence and have no idea what you are talking about. The allegations I have raised against Cohen are, unfortunately, not fraudulent. Were they - I would have taken the 50% community property and moved on with my life.
Do I look like Dennis Riordan? Phil Spector is represented by one of the greatest appellate lawyers in this country - who, I might add, is copied in on my emails. Wouldn’t it be frivolous of Mr. Riordan to overlook what is going on here since he is defending Phil Spector. It is Dennis Riordan, at this point, who will assist Mr. Spector in being released from prison and I absolutely believe the Appeals Court should release Mr. Spector on bond promptly. I also believe they should understand this is a political matter and Mr. Spector was set up. If they don’t understand that they have no right to be on the bench.
I know, Walsh, you’re obsessed and fixated with my story, Cohen’s tax fraud, and Phillip’s set up. You are an individual who entertains themselves with other people’s suffering. No doubt your children, if you have any, are proud of that quality. It’s shameless.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
I will just join Blogonaut’s HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HAPPY THANKSGIVING
November 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, would you elaborate upon your comments about Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar? They specifically told you that they felt the allegations of witness tampering and obstructoin of justice were “ridiculous” and they didn’t care about them, right? I never said posting on a public Blog/bulletin was a federal crime.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 3:05 pm
True or False:
- Kelley Lynch was not Leonard Cohen’s employee;
- Kelley Lynch posted no sexual fantasies about Bruce Cutler, Pat Dixon, etc.;
- Leonard Cohen owes Kelley Lynch money;
- Leonard Cohen targeted her sons and parents;
- Kelley Lynch is a prominent government witness;
- None of the above.
Kelley, what “witness” are all of us tampering with? You are a witness only to your own hateful and evil life. How does Rutger’s severed finger keep him from being in college? It’s more likely he isn’t in college because his nut-case mother can’t sign for the student loans he needs due to her chronic unemployment, lack of legal address, and overall insanity.
Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Kelley Lynch was not Cohen’s employee. I was his personal manager and received a 1099.
I posted no sexual fantasies, whatsoever, about Pat Dixon who I think is repulsive and refuse to discuss Bruce Cutler any longer. He is past history and if he has abandoned Phillip and decided to behave frivolously when an innocent man is rotting in prison that is a choice and decision that Bruce Cutler will have to live with.
Leonard Cohen owes me millions. Gianelli-Blogonaut’s probably clear that the corporate indexes are filed in Bouder Municipal Court. Perhaps he can review that evidence, as Boies Schiller did, and determine that Cohen owes me millions. He will also be able to conclude that I wasn’t a trustee and - being a lawyer - will understand that perjury is criminal and not an acceptable basis for a fraudulent judgement.
Leonard Cohen targeted me, my sons, and parents. See Robert Kory’s Declaration in my young son’s custody matter. It’s evidence of witness tampering with a minor and coercion, etc.
Write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and ask them if I’m a prominent government witness - potentially. Only they can answer that question as it would relate to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.
Rutger is in college and is not up for discussion. He would have been in college full time and probably out of Los Angeles. He, instead, had to find work to support himself - which is not essentially bad. That’s just not what I planned for him - prior to Cohen’s targeting and destroying our lives.
Every word I have uttered is the truth. Head back over to Blogonaut’s Blog, Sydney, and post some more remarks about Phil Spector.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Sidney, my “intuition” tells me that the “reason Rutger lost his finger” is that if Kelley Lynch had been able to continue to siphon money from Cohen’s accounts, she and her cildren would still be living the “high life-style”, Rutger would be in college and not packing meat, and therefore not lost his finger. Is that so hard to understand?
November 25th, 2009 at 3:18 pm
Sydney, how do you know what the IRS has pending and whether or not they consider me a potential witness? Would you like to explain that?
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Walsh, you have no intuition. You are nothing more and nothing less than a pathelogical liar who has targeted a stranger. Rutger actually lost his fingers because Whole Foods didn’t train him and the safety guard was removed. You don’t need “intuition” to tell you this. OSHA told me this - there’s probably criminal neglience involved and I can assure you that this is an incredibly horrendous situation. I think you are sadistic and sick. I didn’t siphon money from Cohen’s accounts. I will not discuss this any further and you have no evidence to support your lies. None whatsoever. I didn’t live a high lifestyle. I actually lived a relatively modest lifestyle so stop talking about things you do not know about - like me, an absolute stranger, or the reasons you intuitively believe are why Rutger lost his fingers. Rutger is in college and working. He wasn’t packing meat. You are just lying and making it up as you go along. You did get the logic that follows - if Rutger had been in college he wouldn’t have lost his fingers because he wouldn’t have been working at Whole Foods in Brentwood. I know tihs for a fact because I am his Mother and know where I planned to send him to school. I also know my son. Now back away from my son you twisted maniac.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Makes perfect sense to me, Susanne. And Kelley, if Rutger is not up for discussion why do you keep throwing his name around in your rants? Why did you bring your children into all this in the first place? None of this concerns your children or your parents or your sister’s family at all, except for the fact that you keep tossing their names into the fray. You are a liar. Always have been, and always will be. If any of the charges, threats and/or accusations you have made had any merit, someone somewhere would have taken action a long time ago. If you want to document all these issues, why not give us all a break and just put it in a journal. That way no one can dispute you; no one can criticize you; no one can call you out on your blatant lies and misrepresentations. You’re just another liar in the world. Nothing more.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
fromKelley Lynch
todoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com”
ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
susanne walsh
dateWed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM
subjectRe:
mailed-bygmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 11:40 AM (0 minutes ago)
P.S. Why don’t you review the corporate indexes. You can determine that Cohen perjured himself when he said I was a trustee, has a pattern of perjury, and illegally issued me the K1s also attached to my Motion to Quash his bullshit attempts to silence me. Also, check out Dale Burgess’ fax. Imagine what the assets that are missing from the “ledger” are worth - that’s right, Jackson, millions. Let me know if you can’t figure out why Boies Schiller wanted Brian Bennett to wire me when I met with Kory. I figured it out. So did Superfon who told me the type of deal Cohen was offering me was “illegal.” I knew that and that is precisely why I asked her to have Kory fax it to me. Let me quote him - he couldn’t; it wasn’t the type of deal that can be faxed. I’ve never heard of that type of deal and I’ve been involved with countless negotiations. Walsh, Gianelli, etc. are pigs, liars, and vicious. I am convinced that the District Attorney has exposed me to these maniacs and a jury is going to see who I believe you are associated with.
- Hide quoted text -
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Jackson,
Do you see the crowd defending Cohen? Decent people will understand the cruelty of targeting Rutger and this insanity with Walsh, Gianelli, etc.
Kelley Lynch
Kelley Lynch
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Sidney, my “intuition” tells me that the “reason Rutger lost his finger” is that if Kelley Lynch had been able to continue to siphon money from Cohen’s accounts, she and her cildren would still be living the “high life-style”, Rutger would be in college and not packing meat, and therefore not lost his finger. Is that so hard to understand?
November 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
“It’s very obvious and very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Treasury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper?”
In so many words, yes.
But it is also a matter of common sense that joining in an internet chat board discussion initiated by the alleged “victim” and posting opinions that her alleged civil lawsuits are not viable and the poster is not credible is not a federal crime, let alone “witness tampering”. (Nor, BTW, is giving testimony in a paternity, or any other, matter.)
Agent Sopko also told us that a reasonable person would not find you credible so we would not be too concerned about your disparaging blog posts and your threats of criminal prosecution.
We say “your” agent Sopko because she is the person at the Department of the Treasury that you write daily (sometimes 10 times daily) to demand the prosecution of just about everyone who annoys you on the internet.
November 25th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
“I didn’t live a high lifestyle.”
Excuse us, Ms. Lynch, it must have been someone else with the $70,000 balance on their Neiman Marcus account and who owned (among other luxuries) a $30,000 Hermès Birkin bag.
And it must have been someone else who posted above as Kelley Lynch to admit to living in a $1.8 MILLION home with a pool in an exclusive Los Angeles neighborhood.
For give us, but that fact that you believe that a $1.8 million home is not that extravagant PROVES that you were indeed living la dolce vita.
You see, Ms. Lynch we do pay attention to “details”—and we remember them too.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:20:18 PM
Subject: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
Agent Sopko,
I want you to read Blogonaut-Gianelli’s public post from Phawker.com (and below). You told Gianelli-Blogonaut thta “a reasonable person would not find” me “credible” so “Blogonaut-Gianelli” should “not be too concerned about” my posts. Right, Agent Sopko? This is, no doubt, verbatim. The Treasury, according to Gianelli-Blogonaut, told him in so many words (which I would like him to repeat verbatim in quotes), that the Treasury does ont believe he is attempting to obstruct justice or witness tampering? Would you mind confirming that for me. There is nothing on Phawker’s Blog or in Gianelli-Blogonaut’s action that can be construed as “common sense.” I did not initiate a “chat room.” I responded to an article Phawker posted about Cohen where I believed I was slandered. Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh (all affiliated with Blogonaut’s garbage site) and others descended and targeted me and have lied and slandered me. I suppose you support that also, correct? I haven’t said that what Gianelli-Blogonaut is now defining as a “federal crime” is a federal crime. He is twisting the words - clearly documented on this Blog - and putting words in my mouth. I have no idea what his stupid remark about giving testimony in a paternity matter has to do with anything.
Perhaps you would also like to explain, for me, how I could threaten criminal prosecution. Do you see me working for the IRS, DOJ, FBI and/or Treasury as a prosecutor? Am I a attorney? Then how could I threaten criminal prosecution? I have reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud and absolutely believe Gianelli-Blogonaut is willfully witness tampering, threatening my son, monitoring my actions, stalking, participating in cyber-terrorism, retaliating against witnesses, raising false allegations about me, accusing me and Rutger of things we have not done, etc.
I have never frivolously requested an investigation into anyone who annoys me. I think Susanne Walsh is a complete lunatic and malicious woman but am convinced that she is merely a Cohen cult victim and her opinions do not interest me. Her vicious comments about Rutger prove, to me, that I am dealing with people who behave unconscionable and are capable of anything. I, do, however, think Kelly Green, Another Kelly Lynch Victim, and others on Phawker’s Blog should be investigated. Not because they annoy me. Because I believe they have motive to undermine a potential “prominent government witness” and sabatage a pending IRS criminal prosecution. I am assuming, based on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s remarks, that the Treasury is now attempting to undermine any potential IRS matter - as is Agent Wynar/FBI who seems to have told Gianelli-Blogonaut that I am a 5150 candidate and will have to testify to that on the stand and back it up with facts which isn’t going to happen.
Kelley Lynch
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:08:44 PM
Subject:
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
“It’s very obvious and very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Treasury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper?”
In so many words, yes.
But it is also a matter of common sense that joining in an internet chat board discussion initiated by the alleged “victim” and posting opinions that her alleged civil lawsuits are not viable and the poster is not credible is not a federal crime, let alone “witness tampering”. (Nor, BTW, is giving testimony in a paternity, or any other, matter.)
Agent Sopko also told us that a reasonable person would not find you credible so we would not be too concerned about your disparaging blog posts and your threats of criminal prosecution.
We say “your” agent Sopko because she is the person at the Department of the Treasury that you write daily (sometimes 10 times daily) to demand the prosecution of just about everyone who annoys you on the internet.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:18 pm
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:25:48 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Blogonaut-Gianelli is interested in my Neiman’s account. Why? Am I married to this deranged madman? I never owned a Hermes Birkin bag and I have never in my life paid anything like that for a handbag. It is an absurd and preposterous allegation and it is a lie. Of course, as usual, Gianelli-Blogonaut will never be able to prove that lie. In any event, the burden of proof is now on Gianelli-Blogonaut. This will be an impossible feat for this liar to prove.
Actually, the Governor lived on Mandeville Canyon Road and the homes are often priced between $25-30 million. I bought my house for approximately $700,000 which was a steal. My Father and I almost single-handledly renovated the house. It was worth $1.8 million when I lost it due to various unfortunate circumstances - including the fact that the potential buyer wanted to give me $200,000 in cash (and an apartment) under the table and did not want to have a written agreement. I did not trust that type of deal although I was assured by him and Wendi Knaak that it was a valid deal. I believe I said my lifestyle was modest. My home was modest. The property values are high.
Gianelli-Blogonaut, as always, does not pay attention to details.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
“I didn’t live a high lifestyle.”
Excuse us, Ms. Lynch, it must have been someone else with the $70,000 balance on their Neiman Marcus account and who owned (among other luxuries) a $30,000 Hermès Birkin bag.
And it must have been someone else who posted above as Kelley Lynch to admit to living in a $1.8 MILLION home with a pool in an exclusive Los Angeles neighborhood.
For give us, but that fact that you believe that a $1.8 million home is not that extravagant PROVES that you were indeed living la dolce vita.
You see, Ms. Lynch we do pay attention to “details”—and we remember them too.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
OOOOH–You have reported us for the sixth hundredth time[?] to Agent Sopko.
We are shaking in our boots, ooooooh!
Ps: Kelley Lynch: You serially threaten criminal prosecution by posting and CCing your victims with threats to report their alleged “cimes” to the “feds” (aa you like o put it), and by posting and copying your victims with emails to Agent Sopko (and many other law enforcers) askiing that your victims be “investigated”. “arrested”, and “prosecued” by the United States.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:32:35 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Gianelli-Blogonaut and the liars are never going to prove that I owned a $30,000 Birkin bag or a $1,000 Birkin bag for that matter. They must have me confused with Paris Hilton or Anjani Thomas. I suppose Gianelli-Blogonaut is confusing this with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg that she spent $30,000 at Neiman Marcus. She thought that’s where this garbage gossip arose from.
My house was modest and guess who is a witness to that fact? Phil Spector. Phillip, however, happened to like my house very very much although it certainly wasn’t as large and/or as glamorous and my neighbors - Susan Lord and Steven Segal. I closed my retirement account, paid the taxes on my IRA withdrawal, and put a downpayment on a very nice, very simple house that was Rutger, Ray and my home.
Are they attempting to turn me into a Hollywood starlett type? I didn’t even go out and no one will ever be able to prove that I did - except for lunches with Cohen or my Mother; shopping or the doctor’s office with the children; carpooling; volunteer work; and - of course - the House of Blues and the restaurant with Harry Dean Stanton with Phillip. I also attended some Grammy parties - on official business because I do not like large events and am not particularly social. His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, Yongzin Rinpoche, Choegon Rinpoche, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, Lingtrul Rinpoche, Chagdud Rinpoche, and many other lamas would frequently visit me and oftentimes stay with me - for months at a time. Yongzin Rinpoche actually lived in my small guest house for a while. And, of course, Gesar Mukpo (my nephew through marriage to Douglas Penick - who was married to Trungpa Rinpoche’s sister-in-law regardless of what Bergman was attempting to prove in Court - that Gesar’s not my nephew) lived with me on Keniston Avenue and Mandeville Canyon.
I’m clear about Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive, are you?
Love,
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:39:20 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
To the IRS Commissoiner,
Cohen did “give” Anjani Thomas her house. Of course, he bought it (and Adam Cohen’s gift house) with assets owned by Traditional Holdings, LLC that he has not - as yet - repaid with 6% interest. He also gave Anjani Thomas an $18,000 baby grand piano and an incredibly expensive garden and other things that are technically gifts - including cash. Trust me - he was well aware of gift taxes. His disdain for them was right up there with his disdain for ordinary income taxes.
All the best,
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Uh, Ms: Lynch: there are purchase records and other proof involved.
Let’s just say that 1. Your Neiman Marcus account records speak for iteself and 2. You were the best accessorized person to habitually sleep on the beach in Santa Monica following the eviction from your luxury home.
Nor (we note) do you deny owing a Birkin bag, nor is there any such thing as a Birkin bag priced under $30,000. (They never go on sale, and there is a long waiting list.)
November 25th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, you’ve lied about the Birkin bag. I never owned one and never would actually. I preferred more reasonable designers - such as Michael Kors. You must have this story confused with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg she spent $30,000 at Neiman’s. My house was modest and my lifestyle was modest.
I haven’t “reported” you to Agent Sopko. I’ve asked her to confirm and validate your comments about what she told you. I have already asked the IRS, DOJ, Tresaury, and FBI to investigate whether or not you are attempting to obstruct justice, sabatage an IRS criminal prosecution (that may be pending), witness tampering, etc. Whether they do is up to them.
I know you think this is fun and exciting - inserting yourself into a deadly serious tax matter and Phil Spector’s set up; insulting federal agents; lying to the FBI; contacting Investigator Frayeh; etc. Your emails and posts of yesterday are evidence that you are arrogant, harassing me, and out of your mind from what I can tell.
I cannot threaten criminal prosecution. I am not a criminal prosecutor or attorney as I’ve repeatedly stated. The “feds” should know, better than I, what is and/or is not a crime. I do not, however, refer to the parties copied in as “the feds” because I am not crass and I am not playing deadly games with them. You are not my victim. You had Joff Belark target me and he wrote one long lie that you posted as an article. No one forced you to descend onto this Blog and lie about me publicly, slander me, threaten my son, and raise fraudulent allegations. You yourself came to this Blog and, from my perspective, your sole motive is to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent goverment witness” and to sabatage any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others. That’s my opinion. I have no idea how the “United States” investigates, arrests, and prosecutes anyone. I asked the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury to investigate you. Whether or not they arrest and prosecute you, Cohen, and others remains to be seen.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
PS: The gifts that a husband (according to you) may have gifted to his wife, have nothing to do with your false statements published here that we have, in part, refuted, including your denial that you were living a life of luxury.
Who cares gifts Leonard Cohen has bestowed on others. He is not the one denying la dolce vita.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, there are purchase records and I can assure you that my credit card records are none of your business or anyone else’s for that matter. There is, however, no proof that I bought a $30,000 Birkin bag because I did not.
Let’s say that you can never subpoena my Neiman Marcus records because you don’t know me and are now, an absolute stranger, interested in my credit card records. Ok. How would you konw how I looked in Santa Monica or how I accessorized myself? I know Peter/Jacob Falconey - who impersonated a federal agent - was stalking me there and reported one incident to Santa Monica PD. The field report of that incident exists.
I absolutely deny ever owning a Birkin bag. I just googled Birkin bag and immediately turned up three under $30,000.
Kelley Lynch
Hermes Birkin bag
$2,750.00 new - eCRATER - vivelarose
Parchemin Clemence & Gold 35cm Hermes Birkin Bag
$15,403.70 new - eCRATER …
Hermes Tan Gold 35CM Birkin Bag Togo Leather
$1,350.00 new - Sacs En Ligne
How To Buy A Birkin Bag
November 25th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
“I cannot threaten criminal prosecution.”
And yet you have, daily.
And yet there are torts and crimes that are premised on private individuals threatening criminal prosecution, notably, the crime of extortion.
By your logic, the crime of extortion does not exist. Nor does the civil right of action against an extortionist.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
I have no idea what you are talking about.
The IRS cares about gift taxes, don’t they? Has anyone else in America paid gift taxes? Then why should Leonard Cohen buy Anjani Thomas and his son houses, give them gifts of well over $11,000 a year, and gift others - including Joshu Sasaki Roshi $500,000 in stock, and not have to pay gift taxes. By the way, Kory told the holding periods were illegal and I think there is an issue with the gift of stock to the Mt. Baldy Zen Center from L.C. Stranger Music, Inc. Fortunately, I wasn’t a partner or owner on that entity and this was clearly a gift from Cohen. This is when the IRS audits began. They continued through the $1 million deposit that Cohen took as a loan and the IRS Agent was right on when he questioned Richard Westin’s evasiveness and sent Sony an unreal document request so no one is going to tell me that every IRS Agent is a McDonald’s worker or the IRS doesn’t think there are credible tax issues at hand - as they relate to Cohen. Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, understood there were. and the IRS is in receipt of those memos from Westin which include possible aggressive defenses to IRS prosecutions from what I could tell.
I didn’t live a life of luxury. Period. You are a liar.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Gianelli/Blogonaut - you are a liar. I cannot threaten criminal prosecution. I have asked the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury to investigate certain issues - including whether or not you have attempted to obstruct justice, witness tampered, etc. I have been clear about this and the “discussion” is now boring. Go back and read my remarks. They are clear.
Have I, notably, stated that there are crimes premised on private individuals - notably, “the crime of extortion.” Thanks for pointing that out. I thought Cohen and Kory engaged in extortion - and that explains Kory’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter. So does witness tampering with a minor.
The crime of extortion exists. Save your legal bullshit for someone like Alan Jackson. I have worked for and with great attorneys - including men who have gone onto become federal judges. I have never in my life heard such garbage legal interpretations as yours in my life. You are talking to yourself. Perhaps you should phone Kory up and give him some tips. He can use them. My lawyers wrote me that he didn’t have a handle on Cohen’s tax issues and was basically afraid to even request copies - from the IRS - of the Traditional Holdings, LLC tax returns. Are you clear about that?
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
“I have no idea what you are talking about.”
We think that you do, Kelley Lynch. You have theatened to have us prosecuted hundreds of times.
And yet, we remain AT LARGE and UNCHARGED!
Regarding your new (after 5 years) allegation that Cohen failed to pay gift taxes when due, I might be a tad skeptical–given the large axe you have to grind.
Besides, the two have been married for years.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko,
Extortion does seem to be criminal. Neal Greenberg raised extortion as an issue in his “companion piece” to Cohen’s bogus lawsuit - I believe they were planned lawsuits. In any event, I am unclear on how Greenberg could raise extortion as a civil matter when, in fact, it is a criminal matter. I know this - when you’re offered 50% community property presumably to lie and say someone who committed criminal tax fraud was defrauded by his advisers (and potentially helping to implicate parties who may be innocent and deserve an opportunity to explain their actions in court) you are being asked to engage in criminal conduct. I also believe the custody matter was used as a coercive weapon meant to crush me. Cohen and Lindsey understood, all too well, precisely how close Ray and I were. And, of course, it was blackmail.
All the best,
Kelley
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extortion
November 25th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Gianelli/Blogonaut, where’s your lawsuit that you threatened me, my sister, brother-in-law, and Rutger with. I’ve already informed you that I will subpoena Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Tresaury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Cohen to the stand. Obviously Courts permit telephonic testimony. My friend just participated in a trial. She’s in Texas and the trial was in Michigan so this is common practice and I personally have participated in a telephonic hearing.
I’ve requested investigations - including into your conduct. You pay attention to details (but lie) so you should understand this.
How quaint - you have remained at large and uncharged. Write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko - Treasury Department. You’re copied in on my emails addressing this latest round of lies and slander. Ask them why you are at large and unchaged? Confirm for them that I think you are tampering with a potential prominent government witness and attempting to help sabatage a potential federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others. Tell them I am convinced of this.
These allegatoins aren’t new. You haven’t been copied in on all my emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff so you don’t know what you’re talking about as usual. In fact, you don’t seem to have a real handle on any of the very real and credible issues. Anyway, I thought gift taxes weren’t relative with respect to Cohen. What’s that - Cohen’s defense? That I have an axe to grind. I reported his tax fraud that I was told is criminal, provided the IRS with evidence, and documented some of what I witnessed.
Who has been married for years? Leonard Cohen and Anjani Thomas are not married. It will, however, be interesting to note for jurors that Cohen offered me 50% community property and yet holds himself out as a man in a relationship with Anjani Thomas. His conversations about my fictional sex life with Oliver Stone ought to drive this point home: that he was and is obsessed with me and he was and is jealous. I know this for a fact. I had to live with it for nearly 20 years.
Kelley Lynch
“Besides, the two have been married for years.”
November 25th, 2009 at 5:14 pm
“Are you clear about that?”
What we are clear about is that until you hijacked our blog, we did not even know you existed, but when we banned you (and before we published the TRUTHFUL AND BALANCED article about you, we were require to educate ourselves about you.
And we now know plenty—including that you are stone crazy.
Moreover, we have not talked to EVERYONE you formerly touted as friends or protectors but we have communicated with Bruce Cutler (thinks you are a stalker), Agent Sopko (thinks you are not credible), Bill Pavelic (thinks you are a “very disturbed woman) and others.
We did not ask for this spat, but you insisted on dragging us into your psychosis, and here we are.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Kelley, you are too much. I get it now. You’ve just been stringing us along all this time, telling us the most outlandish stories just to make us laugh. You’ve succeeded quite well. And to think at one time I actually felt sorry for you. And now, in your 4:55 comment, your jealousy of other people in Leonard Cohen’s life might have been better taken care of than you. And who the heck needs a $1,000 purse? Jealousy is a vicious and evil demon for a person to carry around. Poor, poor Kelley, that weight is getting too heavy, isn’t it. Poor Kelley, nobody loves her, everybody hates her, so she’s gonna eat some woooorrmms.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
deKelley Lynch
paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 13:31
asuntoRe: I Think We’ve Put The Birkin Bag Price Issue To Rest
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 13:31 (0 minutos antes)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Gianelli-Blogonaut’s now interested in Cohen’s gift taxes. This situation became so preposterous. You really should call Van Penick to the stand. He must have thought Cohen was a maniac after receiving calls about residence/tax issues in Canada, having sex with the 15 year old nanny (Cohen was worried about criminal prosecution - Van told me there are no statutes relating to this in Canada), Lorca Cohen’s allegations that he molested her (on Ann Diamond’s public Blog), and the insanity with the gift taxes and the U.S. tax credit for a donation of his work to the University of Toronto’s rare book library. Reeve Chudd, who wants to remain in the dark (I intend to blindside him personally …), emailed me and said he wasn’t an alchemist. It was absurd. Hopefully you’ve reviewed all my emails. Please do use any that you feel are appropriate or irrelevant should you pursue a cirminal prosecution of Cohen. Hopefully, Gianelli and others won’t be able to successfully sabatage any pending or potential prosecution although I am convinced that’s part of the goal and “motive.”
All the best,
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
Alan Jackson Responder |Kelley Lynch para doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., STEPHEN, Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, ajackson
mostrar detalles 13:35 (2 minutos antes)
deKelley Lynch
paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org
ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 13:35
asuntoAlan Jackson
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 13:35 (2 minutos antes)
Here you go Jackson. See if you can follow along. I’m not the Hollywood type and can assure you and the thugs who set Phillip up that I did not live a glamorous life and didn’t have a Birkin bag. Put all your so-called investigators on it. Bennett saw my house. And has my letter from Phil Spector. It’s not yours. Take note of that point and threatening me isn’t the way to respond to a return of evidence request. Evidence of nothing because I didn’t witness Clarkson shoot herself. Phillip did and said it was devastating. Be clear about that - you have set up a man that witnessed a woman shoot herself.
Kelley Lynch
2009/11/25 Kelley Lynch
Correction: Appropriate or relevant.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
What we are clear on is that KL lived in a multi-million pool house (albeit where the pool was filthy Petri-dish, and there were open and unsanitary food containers everywhere), that KL had a $30,000 Birkin bag, spent $10,000 a month at her pharmacy, had a $70,000 balance luxury department store account, received a seven figure (almost $2 M) commission from Cohen before she was foreclosed on, and led, by any objective measure a lux lifestyle.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
“Gianelli-Blogonaut’s now interested in Cohen’s gift taxes.”
Excuse us, but YOU just brought this issue up, five years after you reported Cohen to the IRS–apparently out of desperation that he might no be prosecuted per your revenge fantasies.
November 25th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
deKelley Lynch
paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org
ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 13:43
asuntoRe: FBI
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 13:43 (0 minutos antes)
P.S. My next door neighbors on Mandeville said they wouldn’t permit the Chief of Police on their property after the SWAT incident. The police were also on their property - endangering my neighbors as well as me, Rutger, and his friends which is outrageous.
- Ocultar texto citado -
2009/11/25 Kelley Lynch
To the FBI,
I called the Denver FBI when I was “threatened” by this thug’s colleague for simply requesting that they return my letter from Phil Spector. I have no idea what the Duty Agent that day thought was going on but I know what I heard and I was threatened with “arrest.” That is a terrorist threat and the Attorney General’s office told me - in no uncertain terms - that their threats to arrest me (she was addressing Marco) were viable. Fortunately, Rockaway Police Department seemed to understand that Marco’s conduct was criminal. His “Merry Christmas” to the Denver FBI remark was outrageous and snide, vicious, etc. He pretends he’s Julia’s assistant and is a true thug. He is apparently part of Cooley’s own office. I have no idea what the New Jersey FBI Duty Agent thought I was talking about. He could only hear every third word but was extremely professional.
I have been threatened, on Phawker’s Blog, by Kelly Green with possible further targeting by cops with flashlights. After what I’ve gone through and Gianelli’s urging of LAPD and Boulder PD to further target me I take that very very seriously.
All the best,
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, Let me set the record straight - again. I did not have a pool house. I’ve already stated the amount I paid for my house. What are you now alleging? That I invested well? The pool was perfectly clean and I personally know how to shock a pool. You are a liar who have never been to my house. There is a video of my house - with the Sheriff’s Department - that I will review with my attorney but my house was well maintained and you, as usual, are a liar. Beyond that, it is evidence of nothing except your unbelievable interest in a stranger’s life.
I have stated, for the record, that I never owned a $30,000 Birkin bag and find it repulsive that someone would spend that much on a handbag. I did not spend $10,000 a month at the pharmacy but Steven Clark Lindsey did charge approximately $2000 worth of cipro on my account after 9/11 without my permision. He frequently did this. Cohen, on the other hand, offered me $10,000 walking around money - after I refused to meet with him and hand over the corporate books prior to giving my attorneys copies and around the time Kory - on behalf of Cohen - offered me 50% community property presumably to lie to the IRS and others that he was defrauded by his advisers. Men like Alan Grubman, who personally met with Cohen about the sale of certain assets to Sony, might not appreciate being accused of defrauding Cohen. I was told Cohen was going “after” every one of his advisers. You are going to be called to the witness stand to explain who has told you so much about my personal finances and what your particular interest in my former finances is. I received approximately $1 milloin from Cohen as a commisison and, believe me, I earned every penny of that commisison. I did not, however, receive a 1099 and will view that as a gift. Cohen can pay the gift tax on that gift because his adviser, Richard Westin, was going to recharacterize the nature of certain distributions, etc., from Traditoinal Holdings, LLC. I have no idea what that means and would like the IRS’ Opinion on that matter - obviously. Let me be clear - I did not make a $2 million commisison. That is also a lie. I invested in my card company that Cohen so loved and wanted to help me with. I did not live a luxurious life. I lived a very decent life and educated my children well - in private school and by hiring tutors for my older son who was home-schooled. I also helped lesser advantaged children with tuition, camp fees, tutoring, and so forth and so on. You are and always will be a liar who has targeted me, has motive, and is a liar.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
“I have been threatened, on Phawker’s Blog, by Kelly Green with possible further targeting by cops with flashlights.”
HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
You have quite an imagination KL, but blog posts in response to an on-line discussion that YOU initiated and obviously relesh is not criminal. Nor would a reasonable person reading this blog conclude that you have been “threatened”.
BTW, how is your request to Agent Sopko several months ago to induct you into the fedral witness protection program going? Any word?
Like, anyone would have known that you reported Cohen for “tax fraud” if you had not published that fact on then internet?
As if you would not be protected if you really were a witness to a real prosecution (and not just a prosecution that you have CONCOCTED in your own mind)?
HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
****NUT CASE ALERT ****
November 25th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
Gianelli- Blogonaut, there is no excuse for you. I brought it up to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department ages ago. You weren’t copied in on those emails and are not privy to all my communications with the IRS, Treasury, FBI, or DOJ. You are clearly interested in Cohen’s gift taxes. You addressed them. You just continue to lie. I brought it up as evidence that he has a pattern of intentionally defrauding the U.S. government. I am not bound to any immoral notions that he or you have about protecting criminals. What’s your point? He does or doesn’t owe gift taxes?
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
“Gianelli- Blogonaut, there is no excuse for you. I brought it up to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department ages ago.”
And yet we roam free.
Our point is that you are so hell bent on having your perceived enemies prosecuted that you will say anything, not to mention your mention (for the first time this week) of alleged gift tax violations smacks of desperation that the man you hate will not be prosecuted by the IRS.
****NUT CASE ALERT****
November 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
****NUT CASE ALERT****
November 25th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
HaHaHaHahaaaaWhooooowhoooohahaha!
November 25th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, please review Kelly Green’s remark - directly above - about cops with flashlights. She cautioned me. I brought it to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko - Treasury. Here’s the post. The federal agencies I’ve sent this post to can make their own determination as to whether or not it’s a thinly veiled threat.
How would you know what a reasonable person would conclude?
I didn’t ask Agent Sopko to “induct” me into the witness protection program. Dale Burgess, my former accountant who witnessed a great deal with Cohen, Kory, and others, felt I should be in the witness protection program. Director Black/Star of Hope questioned my safety. These are reasonable and intelligent people. I see it’s a game for you - as usual.
I could care less if people would or wouldn’t have known that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and others. Cohen gave an interview to Brian Johnson and stated publicly what his motive was - his massive tax hit. As you know, he also stated publicly that he was not accusing me of theft.
I suppose I should be protected. Why don’t you write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko as my safety is continually raised as a serious concern. In fact, people have been remarking that they think I’m blessed because I’m still alive. They felt that the people behind (or on) the SWAT incident or who took me to Killer King were deadly serious about causing me harm. Fortunately, I feel well protected. I am, of course, concerned about the safety of both my sons. My friend, John Barry, thought LAPD would attempt to murder me if I testified in court against them. Many people are concerned. I, personally, do not cave into terrorists.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
“I have been threatened, on Phawker’s Blog, by Kelly Green with possible further targeting by cops with flashlights.”
HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
You have quite an imagination KL, but blog posts in response to an on-line discussion that YOU initiated and obviously relesh is not criminal. Nor would a reasonable person reading this blog conclude that you have been “threatened”.
BTW, how is your request to Agent Sopko several months ago to induct you into the fedral witness protection program going? Any word?
Like, anyone would have known that you reported Cohen for “tax fraud” if you had not published that fact on then internet?
As if you would not be protected if you really were a witness to a real prosecution (and not just a prosecution that you have CONCOCTED in your own mind)?
HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
****NUT CASE ALERT ****
November 25th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Ms. Lynch, we care not what you think because you are a nut case, everone you email knows you are a nut case, an no one you threaten will ever be prosecuted.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:07 pm
Ah, older son Rutger was home-schooled - that’s why he couldn’t get into college. Ignorance breeds ignorance. Kelley, are you aware that some of the symptoms of Alzheimer’s is repetition of comments, short term memory dysfunction, distortion of the facts and lack of time awareness. It’s been 5 years Kelley. More than enough time for all these federal and state agencies to have taken action against all the people you are going to sue and subpoena. Not one word of yours even comes close to the truth. You can twist and turn, wiggle and waggle, jump up and down and this will never change. The only reason none of these agencies have taken any action is because there is no cause to, probable or otherwise.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
deKelley Lynch
paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org
ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:16
asuntoRe: Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Dangerously Unstable
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 14:16 (0 minutos antes)
To the FBI and DOJ,
One must ask why he is so focused on me, monitoring my activity and whereabouts, threatening my son, sister, and brother-in-law, sending me obviously harassing and disturbing emails, and utterly fixated on me, Cohen’s tax fraud and Phil Spector’s set up. This is the man that Alan Jackson contacted. Did you have an opportunity to take a look at Michelle Blaine’s vile Blog. She thanked Blogonaut for targeting my email accounts and Blogs. I am not threatening Gianelli-Blogonaut. I am asking you to investigate him. This is not normal behavior and it crosses any concept of decency. He is dead set on slandering me and lying about me. I remain convinced that he is witness tampering and his motive and goal is to undermine me as a credible potential prominent government witness and to sabatage any potential and/or pending federal prosecution of Cohen. That’s probably why Investigator Frayeh thought this maniac found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson. I think that sums things up perfectly and - voila - William Frayeh is off the Spector matter. Fortunately, Investigator Frayeh saw through Gianelli-Blogonaut and informed me that he is a shady character. I think that’s true understatement.
Agent Wynar is absolutely going to take the stand to testify about his conversations with Gianelli. I am assuming there are tape recordings of those conversations as well. I want the jury to hear precisely what unfolded and what was said. Gianelli lied to the FBI and he contacted Agent Sopko? Why? Because he is attempting to determine if Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted. It’s dead obvious if you’re paying attention to the details and have a knack for seeing through liars and their lies.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Ms. Lynch, we care not what you think because you are a nut case, everone you email knows you are a nut case, an no one you threaten will ever be prosecuted.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
I agree, Blogonaut, she’s a nut case - through and through. I hope all the law enforcement agencies and agents she sends multiple emails to are at least getting a good belly-laugh about her. She certainly has earned it.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Actually, Sydney from Blogonaut’s Phil Spector Section, Rutger was home-schooled with tutors who were teachers at private schools in the Los Angeles area - such as Marymount, The Brentwood School, and even professors from UCLA. He received a very good education. Furthermore, his Father - Douglas Penick, graduated Princeton and is a brilliant man who assisted with Rutger’s education. Rutger is in school.
You are now calling a perfect stranger, my son, ignorant. This proves to me that you are cruel and dead set on slandering me and Rutger. It is unconscionable conduct.
You have raised one crucial point: I’ve been documenting the destruction of my life for five years because details (names, dates, places, incidents, etc.) are difficult to recall. I thought it would be best to have a record of everything - accurately reflecting what was happening as it happened. Thanks for pointing that out.
Every single word I have spoken and written about these matters is the truth. Actually, I heard that Srocket of Trials & Tribulations twists all the facts in the Phil Spector matter. She’s apparently the mouthpiece for “Donna Clarkson” who seems to have money as her motive for attempting to turn her daughter’s suicide into a homicide. That’s a hell of a “concept.”
I’ll let the federal agencies copied in on my emails know that you have publicly stated, for the record, that “The only reason none of these agencies have taken any action is because there is no cause to, probable or otherwise.” Apparently you are now their spokesperson.
Kelley Lynch
P.S. By the way, Rutger is briliant and an unpeachable witness. I know this is disturbing.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
deKelley Lynch
paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org
ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:24
asuntoRe: Sydney - From Blogonaut’s Blog - Attempts To Undermine Rutger (A Material Witness)
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 14:24 (0 minutos antes)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko,
Are you getting (at least) a “good belly-laugh” out of the destruction of my life, targeting of my family, and Sydney’s attack on my son Rutger who has been through an unconscionable ordeal?
All the best,
Kelley
Sydney Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
I agree, Blogonaut, she’s a nut case - through and through. I hope all the law enforcement agencies and agents she sends multiple emails to are at least getting a good belly-laugh about her. She certainly has earned it.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
William Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
RecibidosX
Responder |Kelley Lynch para doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., STEPHEN, Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, ajackson, wfrayeh, billpavelic
mostrar detalles 14:28 (0 minutos antes)
deKelley Lynch
paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org
ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:28
asuntoWilliam Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 14:28 (0 minutos antes)
Hello Investigator Frayeh and Bill,
I thought you might get a real laugh out of the fact that Rutger is now being attacked and trashed on Phawker.com. Take a look at the criminals that I believe are somehow affiliated with Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, the Clarkson family, and others. Hope you get a good belly laugh.
You’re only on this email. I think I am communicating perfectly well with the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan on my own.
Gianelli’s being harassing me via emails and is so interested in my finances, Cohen’s gift taxes, and dead set on slandering me, lying about me, etc.
This is your buddy, right Bill?
Kelley
November 25th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:39
asuntoRe: William Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 14:39 (0 minutos antes)
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
You have been emailing me for two days. I have sent those emails to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Wynar, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan. You are harassing me, targeting me on Blogs (such as Phawker.com right now), threatening my son, monitoring my activities, lying about me, etc. I can assure you that this is not spam. I don’t know what your “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” emails are but I viewed them as evidence that you are unstable, deeply disturbed, and harassing me. Stop lying about me, stop targeting me on the internet, stop attempting to undermine my credibility and I will stop communicating with you completely. Are we clear?
Kelley Lynch
2009/11/25 STEPHEN GIANELLI
- Ocultar texto citado -
Ms. Lynch:
I have asked you repeatedly to stop spamming this address with your inappropriatre and obviosuly desturbed emails, as have many of the other email spam victims cced with your email. Enough already!
November 25th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
BWAAHAAHHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHAHA. Tooooo much…
November 25th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:43
asuntoRe: cc: IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan Re: Gianelli/Blogonaut
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 14:43 (0 minutos antes)
To the IRS Commisisioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Agent Sopko - the Treasury, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Here’s an email I just received from Stephen Gianelli on my twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com account. Apparently he can’t make up his mind. I didn’t have a Birkin bag and am not disclosing any personal information to this maniac. It’s none of his business.
All the best,
Kelley
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
To: Kelley Lynch
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 2:21:32 PM
Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
Ok, then what did youn pay for you Birken bag adn what do you claim your NM high balance was?
November 25th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Kelley Lynch email in out inbox 29 minutes ago:
“To the FBI and DOJ,
“Would you please review all the posts on Phawker.com. Gianelli, who does not know me but is fixated on me and clearly stalking me and monitoring my actions, seems to have gone off the deep end again. This is quite unnerving actually. He sees the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko copied in and must understand (being a lawyer) that this is a deadly serious matter - including the fact that Phil Spector was obviously set up.
“All the best,
“Kelley”
Is this woman priceless or what?
Earth to Ms. Lynch:
One does not email the Federal Bureau of Investigating and the Internal Revenue Service and ask them to review all of the posts on some blog, unless the asker is a NUT JOB.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
“You have been emailing me for two days.”
Quite the contrary, Ms. Lynch.
This blog has recieved 30 emails from you in the last 24 hours.
We have replied, mainly with laughter, to a half dozen of those emails.
Once again, you twist the truth to your own ends.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
RecibidosX
Responder |Kelley Lynch para STEPHEN, ajackson, doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, wfrayeh, billpavelic
mostrar detalles 14:53 (2 minutos antes)
deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:53
asuntoLet’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 14:53 (2 minutos antes)
To the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Agent Sopko - the Treasury, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Here are some of the emails Gianelli-Blogonaut sent me yesterday. This is the man writing me about Birkin bags I never owned, my Neiman’s account (remember - he doesn’t know me), and “spam.” I am actually concerned about his obsession with and fixation on me and my family. I am extremely concerned about this.
All the best,
Kelley
— On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:36 AM
HAHAHAHA, oh my gawd, it hurts, hshahsahahahsaha!!!!!
Kelley Lynch you make everyone laugh so hard……hahahahaha!
— On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject: Re:
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:12 AM
Hawhahaaawhooohwoo*gasp*hahahaha!!!
— On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:11 AM
“positively”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HaHaHaHaaaaHawwhooowhohahaha!!!
— On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject: Re: Attention: FBI cc: Alan Jackson
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:08 AM
HahawhaaaaawheeeeeWhooowhoooHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury - Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:45 PM
hahahahahawHOOOOOOOWHOOOOhAAAAhA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
— On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:
From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
Subject:
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:44 PM
HAhaaaaawHOOOOWHOOOHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Have us prosecuted?
Very funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
November 25th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Quite the contrary? Then what are the emails of yours that I’ve just posted (above)? You are being copied in because you are not going to have deniability at some future date. You are attempting to undermine my credibility. I believe there is a possible pending federal matter relating to Cohen and I believe that explains why the IRS, DOJ, FBI and Agent Sopko - Treasury are copied in on my emails. I believe I am a potential prominent government witness. I believe you are intentionally witness tampering. I believe you are attempting to sabatage a pending IRS matter. I believe you are dangerous unstable and obsessed with me. And, I know for a fact that you are a pathelogical liar.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
“You have been emailing me for two days.”
Quite the contrary, Ms. Lynch.
This blog has recieved 30 emails from you in the last 24 hours.
We have replied, mainly with laughter, to a half dozen of those emails.
Once again, you twist the truth to your own ends.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:56 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
I’m emailing the IRS and FBI and have asked them to review this Blog and - in particular - your posts. They have email addresses and that is one way to communicate with the IRS and FBI. For the record, it’s the Federal Bureau of Investigation - not the Bureau of Investigating although I think it’s clear that you should be investigated. Of course, I can’t prosecute you or threaten prosecution because I’m not a federal prosecutor or attorney. If I were I can assure you that you would end up in prison. No doubt about that. I’d be doing the Cal State Bar Crowd and the United States of America a favor. Think of it as a “compassionate” act.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Kelley Lynch email in out inbox 29 minutes ago:
“To the FBI and DOJ,
“Would you please review all the posts on Phawker.com. Gianelli, who does not know me but is fixated on me and clearly stalking me and monitoring my actions, seems to have gone off the deep end again. This is quite unnerving actually. He sees the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko copied in and must understand (being a lawyer) that this is a deadly serious matter - including the fact that Phil Spector was obviously set up.
“All the best,
“Kelley”
Is this woman priceless or what?
Earth to Ms. Lynch:
One does not email the Federal Bureau of Investigating and the Internal Revenue Service and ask them to review all of the posts on some blog, unless the asker is a NUT JOB.
November 25th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Da-doo-dum-dum-dum-da-doo-dum-dum……………..
November 25th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
asuntoRe: Quite The Contrary Writes Blogonaut-Gianelli Who I View As A Pathelogical Liar And Criminal
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 15:11 (0 minutos antes)
P.S. I’m assuming “Blogonaut” is his alter-ego but I’m not an FBI profiler. I do, however, see right through this “asshole.” Pardon my french! He cannot contain or control himself.
November 25th, 2009 at 7:18 pm
Fair Enough? Responder |Kelley Lynch para STEPHEN, ajackson, doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, wfrayeh, billpavelic
mostrar detalles 15:24 (0 minutos antes)
deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:24
asuntoFair Enough?
enviado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 15:24 (0 minutos antes)
To All The Federal Pranksters Copied In On My Emails,
Fair enough? You tell him when he’ll be charged and/or prosecuted. I knew there was a good reason why I didn’t follow through with law school. Gianelli should be stapled to that statement as “Exhibit A.” Jackson and his “hairdo” can be “Exhibit B.”
All the best,
Kelley
2009/11/25 Kelley Lynch
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Why put a time limit on it? Is there a rush to be indicted? You are lying about me and you are not going to deny the fact (at a later date and/or time) that I didn’t do everything humanly possible to set the record straight. You have also threatened my son Rutger and I find that unconscionable. I realize this is a game for you but I’m deadly serious. Write your buddy, Bill Pavelic, who is copied in on this email and about to be removed. Tell him I said - if you want to associate with these thugs you should rot in hell.
Fine. You haven’t been charged. I can’t speak for federal agencies. Maybe they think you’re behavior - including yesterday’s emails - are perfectly normal. I think they are indicative of the fact that you are dangerously unstable and obsessed with me.
I’m not focused on time frames. I’m focused on the truth, the facts, and the destruction of my children’s lives. I’m focused on the fact that Rutger has been attacked by “Sydney” who is posting on Phawker.com and your Blog. This isn’t a game and all bets are off. Think of this as pot limit and I’m all in. You’re bluffing. I’m deadly serious. I want you in prison and think you should be. You are playing a game and attempting to sabatage or derail a possible IRS prosecution of Cohen. That’s my personal opinion.
Agent Sopko can say whatever she wants. Let me assure you of this - Kelly Sopko does not and never will represent me. That’s a direct quote, right: Sopko told you verbatim: “I have nothing to fear.” Sounds like one hell of a conversation. Were you asking her if you were going to be charged or prosecuted?
Write the people you call “the feds” and ask them for a deadline. You’re playing games with them. I’m not playing games.
Kelley Lynch
deSTEPHEN GIANELLI
paraKelley Lynch
cc*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
enviado porgmail.com
firmado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)
Fair enough Kelley Lynch.
And can we further agree that if no one affiliated with the Blogonaut.Law.Blog, including the undersigned, is thereafter charged or incited for “witness tampering” , within say, 30 days, then you will stop harassing us?
In reality, you have made these same allegations on multiple occasions to the FBI, Justice, Agent Sokpo, the IRS, and many others, for over 6 months and we remain uncharged.
So at what point in time without criminal charges against is are you willing to concede that we are blameless?
I mean, Agent Sokpo, already told me I have nothing to fear, but by what date are you willing to concede that no federal prosecution is forthcoming?
Please give us a drop-dead date to calender.
November 25th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
OK, we will play, your imagined protector Agent Sopko will decide if posting contrary opinions to yours on a public internet discussion which you initiated is “witness tampering”. Please do let us know of Agent Sopko’s take, will you?
Because she has already told us that we have nothing to worry about.
Ms. Lynch, the fact that you believe that the federal employees that you spam daily think you are anything but a stand-out nut case in a government that constantly receives nut case emails is terribly sad, but it is time that you faced facts.
November 25th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
PS Kelley Lynch:
the email header info you pubished, includng “deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI” and “fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
enviado porgmail.com
firmado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)”
would indicate that you have left Ca and are now in MX.
November 25th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
Good catch Blogonaut. I was wondering why everything was in Spanish. I was hoping that perhaps she had fled to Cuba - you know, somewhere that her freedom to post lies and other nonsense on the internet would be severely restricted.
November 25th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.
We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.
But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.
Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.
Very sick, very pathological.
Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.
We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.
But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.
Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.
Very sick, very pathological, very sad.
November 25th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
For the record, Sopko is not my protector. She is an ordinary human being who should be ashamed of herself and her rotten ordinary position in life.
Keley Lynch
www.karmapa-issue.org
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
OK, we will play, your imagined protector Agent Sopko will decide if posting contrary opinions to yours on a public internet discussion which you initiated is “witness tampering”. Please do let us know of Agent Sopko’s take, will you?
Because she has already told us that we have nothing to worry about.
Ms. Lynch, the fact that you believe that the federal employees that you spam daily think you are anything but a stand-out nut case in a government that constantly receives nut case emails is terribly sad, but it is time that you faced facts.
November 25th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
It would indicate nothing, asshole.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
PS Kelley Lynch:
the email header info you pubished, includng “deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI” and “fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
enviado porgmail.com
firmado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)”
would indicate that you have left Ca and are now in MX.
November 25th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Am I? How would you know about space, “ASSHOLE?”
WoW! - you “talked” to the FBI. How impressive. I’ve talked to them also. Who is my “pet” IRS agent that you are attempting to undermine? Maybe the IRS should weigh in on the Karmapa. Really. They’re so all-mighty. They should decide who the real Karmapa is. I know I’m real impressed with Commissioner Doug Shulman who runs one rotten and psychotic “organization.” Shulman should understand this - he is no one. Nothing. His position is temporary and his focus is ordinary and relative.
Fuck you asshole. I hope you rot in prison.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.
We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.
But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.
Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.
Very sick, very pathological.
Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.
We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.
But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.
Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.
Very sick, very pathological, very sad.
November 25th, 2009 at 9:09 pm
Give me my pet’s name and badge number, asshole.
We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.
November 25th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
www.karmapaissue.org
I know Gianelli - the “men” dealing with the politics of China, India, Tibet, Bhutan, Taiwan, etc. are fucking stupid idiots right? Fine. You understand space. They understand assholes and corruption. I have no doubt that they are SO IMPRESSED that you actually talked to my pet IRS agent. You didn’t fuck him also, did you? God. I hope my pet isn’t “gay.”
November 25th, 2009 at 9:12 pm
Whatever. Pavelic worked for Phil Spector. What is he now - your claim to fame?
Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.
November 25th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
And the mob leader attorney, Bruce Cutler, doesn’t like. Whatever. Bruce Cutler is so much better and so much more intelligent than I am. I did not, however, trade Phil Spector’s soul so that I could be really high profile mob leader lawyer. Did I? Bruce Cutler is a traitor. My friend is rottting in prison. Phillip is innocent and Cutler is talking to you about my sexual fantasies. That’s fine. Cutler shold do whatever the hell he wants. I’m fighting like hell for my friend’s life. I will die for Phil Spector. He has been rendered unrecognizable and I could not live with myself if I didn’t stand my ground and stand up against the criminals who set him up. If law enforcement or government wants to target me - know this: I will die and I will reincarnate and I will focus on you for eternity. Take that to your grave. I do not want to live in a country where innocent people rot in prison so people have careers. If you do - sobiet. I also am really uninterested in getting the FBI’s autopgraph. His Holiness Kusum Llingpa predicted the terrorist attack that took out the space shuttle. The FBI can spend an eternity investigating that. Fortunately, they cannot dissect His Holiness. He is dead and his brilliance was inconceivable. He spent 20 years in a prison in Tibet because he refused to turn on the Lord Buddha. He was tortured; dragged behind a truck; hung out in a blizzard; tortured .. and, he is one of the bravest men on this earth. Your crowd - including Jackson - are haridressers compared to His Holiness.
Kelley Lynch
November 25th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
We just recieved this email from KL:
“Karmapa Khenno,
“Good evening, Your Holness. Did you know that Agent Kelly Sopko was a dharmapala? I had no idea. What’s her place on the lineage tree? Did you notice that Gianelli copied Rutger in on certain emails.
“I no longer “cling” - as the great “Dzogchen Master Blogonut” put it to any illusions about Bruce Cutler. I have concluded that Bruce Cutler abandoned Phillip. He is a frivolous man - interested in mob leaders. That’s another game we’re playing in America. John Gotti, Jr. is on trial for the 4th time and the jury is dead-locked. We are under attack by Al Qaeda and the “feds” are focused on some insanity with John Gotti, Jr. No one can figure out the issues. It may be that he quit “the mob” - a really degenerate term for “Italian Americans.” There is something wrong here. There is something wrong with the government’s focus. All His Holiness Kusum Lingpa worried about were extremist Muslims. And yet - our government has endless resources to spend targeting one man who may or may not have murdered someone. We don’t know. We, the ordinary folks, can’t figure out what he’s being charged with.
“Are you my victim, Karmapa? Am I your stalker?
“Please give my love and respect to Sharmapa and Jigme Rinpoche. Thank you for protecting me through “prayer” something Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley, Truc Do, Leonard Cohen, Steve Lindsey, and others will never understand. That’s their karma, Karmapa. May they rot in hell.
“Love,
“Kelley
“P.S. Just watched your enthronement. Cannot believe that the 16th Karmapa’s attendant was murdered. Anything for politics, money, and fame, Karmapa. Ordinary men and their ordinary corrupt tendencies. See Gianelli’s email below. XXOO”
We rest our case.
–Blogonaut
November 25th, 2009 at 10:29 pm
So much violence for a self-proclaimed Buddhist. Careful there, Kelley, your true colors are coming out loud and clear. Crazy, violent, delusional. What’s wrong Kelley, reality starting to sink in? Truth starting to cut through your BS? Keep it up. It won’t be long before someone has the good sense to lock you up somewhere and throw away the key until sanity overtakes you.
November 25th, 2009 at 10:50 pm
BTW, Sydney, between 12:01 am and 5:51pm today this blog received 51 emails from Kelley Lynch–all cced to scores of others. (Oh, yea, that’s “normal” behavior.)
Generally, when Lynch is cornered with facts and logic, she resorts to sending emails to her “holly men” which are couched in eastern jargon but convey hate and envy. She talks the talk but does not walk the walk.
Lynch used to hang with some of this crowd through 2005–but she has never published a response to any of her emails, only her one-sided emails to others, cc’d to us, the IRS, Sopko, scores of others, as if to say, “see, I know these important people, I am not a loon”.
We are not buying it and the IRS does not care.
Game, set, match.
November 26th, 2009 at 12:39 am
Too bad none of those people care enough about her to risk involvement in her on-going acid trip. You know, she really doesn’t need real friends when she has so many she can fantasize about. She’s a poser…
November 26th, 2009 at 1:20 am
Good God, Kelley. If you thought I was threatening you with cops with flashlights you’re more insane and hopeless than even I thought possible.
Someones been watching too much “In Plain Sight” if she thinks the feds will enroll her in the witness protection program. Hmm, perhaps all we can do is hope. Remember the first rule in witness protection is you give up all your prior life: all your contacts, your family, co-workers, advisors, enemies. You’re expected to get a job and be a sane, rational, and productive member of society. Most likely those you’d have to give up would be extatic. You’d just go away—never to be heard from again. Damn, perhaps we should petition the feds to get you in witness protection. Imagine an internet free of Kelley Lynch! One more thing. Care to guess how many 5150 patients claim to be in the witness protection program and how many demand the gov’t put them in witness protection?
November 26th, 2009 at 1:31 am
One can only hope, Kelly Green. What a miracle to view a web site covering Leonard Cohen and not be deluged with threats and bullshit from Kelley. I think you’re right, she does watch too much TV. Perhaps her current location in Mexico will find her at least a bit restricted when it comes to internet access. Again, one can only hope. Can you believe the crap she’s posting to Blogonaut? If she keeps posting stuff like that, the cops will come and take her away, and it would be good riddance to bad trash.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:41 am
Ok, Kelley, what’s the real reason you left the USA? Too much pressure?
Do you think any of us are suprised you turned on Agent Sopko? Just out of curiosity, are you related to former Sen Joseph McCarthy? He had an enemies list, too. You should google his name and find out how well his evilness worked for him.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:49 am
And what the hell does Junior Gotti have to do with Leonard Cohen? How dare you slur Italian Americans. You should be ashamed of yourself; however, you’re a sociopath and sociopaths don’t have the ability to experience shame.
November 26th, 2009 at 2:02 am
Kelley slurs anyone she can think of, whether she knows them or not. Next, we’ll see Gotti’s lawyers being cc’d on her rants. I’m sure they’ll run right out to assist her (sarcasm dripping all over the place), just like Phil Spector’s lawyers are beating a path to her door. And you are absolutely right about sociopaths - no conscience, no shame, no notice of any wrongdoing, everything is everybody’s fault, victimized by society, blah, blah, blah.
November 26th, 2009 at 3:13 am
Wanna bet her reason for leaving the US is cuz she and her “precious evidence” are no longer safe here. That’s right, Kelley, you’re going to save the US from Leonard Cohen and his fans.
As for the rest of us, we can only hope when she tries to re-enter the US her name pops up on some homeland security screen—and she’s held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI. While I’m not a fan of the Patriot Act, hopefully uncle sam will just make her disappear so she can’t be a threat to anyone.
Kelley, why do we never see your “Holiness” (and I do mean that respectfully) teacher/friends rsponses to you email? Have they ever replied? I wonder, cuz you just can’t help yourself and you know you’d have to post them.
To my fellow posters, Happy Thanksgiving!
November 26th, 2009 at 4:02 am
What’s the matter, Gianelli-Blogonuat? You don’t like the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa?
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
We just recieved this email from KL:
“Karmapa Khenno,
“Good evening, Your Holness. Did you know that Agent Kelly Sopko was a dharmapala? I had no idea. What’s her place on the lineage tree? Did you notice that Gianelli copied Rutger in on certain emails.
“I no longer “cling” - as the great “Dzogchen Master Blogonut” put it to any illusions about Bruce Cutler. I have concluded that Bruce Cutler abandoned Phillip. He is a frivolous man - interested in mob leaders. That’s another game we’re playing in America. John Gotti, Jr. is on trial for the 4th time and the jury is dead-locked. We are under attack by Al Qaeda and the “feds” are focused on some insanity with John Gotti, Jr. No one can figure out the issues. It may be that he quit “the mob” - a really degenerate term for “Italian Americans.” There is something wrong here. There is something wrong with the government’s focus. All His Holiness Kusum Lingpa worried about were extremist Muslims. And yet - our government has endless resources to spend targeting one man who may or may not have murdered someone. We don’t know. We, the ordinary folks, can’t figure out what he’s being charged with.
“Are you my victim, Karmapa? Am I your stalker?
“Please give my love and respect to Sharmapa and Jigme Rinpoche. Thank you for protecting me through “prayer” something Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley, Truc Do, Leonard Cohen, Steve Lindsey, and others will never understand. That’s their karma, Karmapa. May they rot in hell.
“Love,
“Kelley
“P.S. Just watched your enthronement. Cannot believe that the 16th Karmapa’s attendant was murdered. Anything for politics, money, and fame, Karmapa. Ordinary men and their ordinary corrupt tendencies. See Gianelli’s email below. XXOO”
We rest our case.
–Blogonaut
November 26th, 2009 at 4:04 am
Sorry I have religious beliefs, Sydney? I know you prefer psycho-babble.Sydney What’s violent about stating, for the record, that Gianelli-Blogonaut is an “asshole?” and requesting the name of my “pet” federal agent - go quote Gianelli-Blogonaut?
Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 10:29 pm
So much violence for a self-proclaimed Buddhist. Careful there, Kelley, your true colors are coming out loud and clear. Crazy, violent, delusional. What’s wrong Kelley, reality starting to sink in? Truth starting to cut through your BS? Keep it up. It won’t be long before someone has the good sense to lock you up somewhere and throw away the key until sanity overtakes you.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:14 am
By the way, Gianelli-Blogonaut, I received six plus deranged emails from you yesterday and a number of emails today about my non-existent Birkin bag. There’s nothing normal about a pathelogical liar that writes me six letters containing “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” - particularly when you are threatening my son and monitoring my actions. You are, from my perspective, a dangerously unstable individual with “motive.”
Cornered with facts? If you call your garbage lies “facts.” You wanted to discus a Birkin bag that I never owned. You stated, publicly, that there aren’t any Birkin bags listed under $30,000. I found several. Emailing me about handbags does not seem normal - particularly when you are attempting to undermine my credit as a potential prominent government witness and probably have motive to derail and/or sabatage a potential federal government prosecution of Leonard Cohen.
Are you an atheist, Gianelli-Blogonaut? What’s wrong with “holy men” like the 14th Sharmapa. I see - you, a perfect stranger, know that I “used to hang with some of the crowd” that now has Situ Rinpoche on lock down in India - viewed, by the Indian government, as a national security threat. I had no idea “Sopko” was in the same league as the Karmapa and Sharmapa. I guess your name-dropping of “Agent Sopko” and other pet agents is your way of saying “Hey Look, I’m screwing around with federal agents. They’re real stupid. I’m blatantly witness tampering and no one cares.” Evidence that you may be criminally insane.
IRS Spokesperson Stephen Gianelli-Blogonaut states his case.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:18 am
Too bad the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 14th Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche have to witness people talking about my pet federal agents in a potential federal criminal prosecution. Sydney speaks for these men - who it doesn’t know either. Yes, I’m fantasizing about four great Tibetan lamas who are witnessing utter insanity. I don’t really have to fantasize about their perceptions, however - His Holiness Kusum Lingpa told me that Cohen is “an asshole who is going to hell.”
I thought I was a homeless loser. Now I’m’ a poser because I have religious beliefs? Sorry, I forgot I was documenting the postings of criminal atheists.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:24 am
Kelly Green, your posting about cops and flashlights is on this Blog. Thanks for warning me not to look up. I didn’t realize they would be targeting me.
And that someone is you.
The feds won’t be “enrolling me” in the Sammy Gravano protection system. I’ll take my chances in the real world. Why would “the feds” and my own “pet agent” want to “enroll” me in the witness protection program if there’s no pending federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Norman Cohen? I didn’t realize they had such vast resources to waste - although I know Cohen probably thinks they’re all have a merry time with this “prank” we’re all engaged in. Actually, Rule #1 - do not deal drugs when you are in the federal witness protection program. Gravano forgot this rule and must have also thought that he had some “federal pets.”
While you focus on the witness protection program - I’ll fantasize about the people I think should bei in prison. Phil Spector’s prosecutors are on that list. I’m not sure Alan Jackson will be permitted to bring his “hair dresser” along, however. Maybe he’ll have a “mob boyfriend” and then he and Brian Bennett can discuss, ad nauseum, whether or not Philllip’s girlfriend was a “mob waitress.” I know Brian Bennett personally raised this as an issue.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:25 am
P.S. Let me reiterate - Cohen is one hell of a “folk singer.” I wonder why he doesn’t live in Canada?
November 26th, 2009 at 4:31 am
Actually, I thought Blogonaut turned on Agent Sopko - who is now apparently my “pet” federal agent.
Green, you are going to have to prove I left the U.S. This reminds me of a conversation I had with Cohen the day he wanted me to go into Greenberg, Glusker and sign a settlement agreement. I didn’t realize Houston was in another country. Didn’t Gianelli-Blogonaut track me to the Star of Hope? He seemed to track yahoo to Sunnyvale, California.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:41 am
Ok, Kelley, what’s the real reason you left the USA? Too much pressure?
Do you think any of us are suprised you turned on Agent Sopko? Just out of curiosity, are you related to former Sen Joseph McCarthy? He had an enemies list, too. You should google his name and find out how well his evilness worked for him.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:33 am
I can’t imagine what John Gotti, Jr. would have in common with Cohen except that Cohen loves “the mob” and loves to talk about the “fact” (according to him) that Suzanne Elrod’s family was in the Jewish mafia. I guess you didn’t realize that Cohen loves “the mob.” I am an Italian American.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:35 am
Sydney, am I now in Mexico? Actually I can’t believe the six emails I posted on this Blog - that I received from Gianelli-Blogonaut yesterday. And then there are the others and today’s emails about a Birkin handbag I never owned. Apparently Gianelli-Blogonaut spoke with Sergeant Fernandez and other members of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department who illegally invaded my house. I know I refused to let Michelle Rice in so I’m assuming his “gossip” about my former house came from them.
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:31 am
One can only hope, Kelly Green. What a miracle to view a web site covering Leonard Cohen and not be deluged with threats and bullshit from Kelley. I think you’re right, she does watch too much TV. Perhaps her current location in Mexico will find her at least a bit restricted when it comes to internet access. Again, one can only hope. Can you believe the crap she’s posting to Blogonaut? If she keeps posting stuff like that, the cops will come and take her away, and it would be good riddance to bad trash.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:37 am
I suppose it’s safe to assume that Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan are complete idiots, Sydney - if you insist.
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 2:02 am
Kelley slurs anyone she can think of, whether she knows them or not. Next, we’ll see Gotti’s lawyers being cc’d on her rants. I’m sure they’ll run right out to assist her (sarcasm dripping all over the place), just like Phil Spector’s lawyers are beating a path to her door. And you are absolutely right about sociopaths - no conscience, no shame, no notice of any wrongdoing, everything is everybody’s fault, victimized by society, blah, blah, blah.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:42 am
Do you know why you don’t see people’s emails to me, Green? Because you’re a total stranger who has targeted me. The emails people - like Cohen - really want to see are Richard Westin’s. That was his tax lawyer. Cohen can subpoena them from the IRS. As Cohen himself as brought up in Court repeatedly - my AOL accounts were shut down and I no longer have access to those emails. Hopefully, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Phil Spector reviewed my emails. I did, after all, give them the passwords to tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com. Kory repeatedly mentions this. He seems fixated on it actually.
Green, you are going to have to prove that I have left the country. No one seems to know who Cohen is in the United States from what I can tell. They do, however, seem to understand that Phil Spector is a legendary record producer whose name sells albums and creates careers - particularly if you throw in the “de riguer” gun story.
I’m now a threat to the IRS and FBI. I think the IRS and FBI will have to personally address that issue now since I believe you are a liar. But, since you are holding yourself out as a spokesperson for the IRS and FBI you might as well tell the world what else they’re thinking. Why would Uncle Sam want to make me disappear? Am I now in a federal conspiracy? Perhaps Oliver Stone, a friend of mine, can do the movie then. I’ll be sure to ask him to leave your part out.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 3:13 am
Wanna bet her reason for leaving the US is cuz she and her “precious evidence” are no longer safe here. That’s right, Kelley, you’re going to save the US from Leonard Cohen and his fans.
As for the rest of us, we can only hope when she tries to re-enter the US her name pops up on some homeland security screen—and she’s held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI. While I’m not a fan of the Patriot Act, hopefully uncle sam will just make her disappear so she can’t be a threat to anyone.
Kelley, why do we never see your “Holiness” (and I do mean that respectfully) teacher/friends rsponses to you email? Have they ever replied? I wonder, cuz you just can’t help yourself and you know you’d have to post them.
To my fellow posters, Happy Thanksgiving!
November 26th, 2009 at 4:44 am
What’s your point Gianelli-Blogonaut? Let’s stay focused on your psychotic harassment emails to me from yesterday - and today.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
PS Kelley Lynch:
the email header info you pubished, includng “deKelley Lynch
paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI” and “fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
enviado porgmail.com
firmado porgmail.com
ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)”
would indicate that you have left Ca and are now in MX.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:48 am
For the record, I did not leave the United States and am not in Mexico.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:00 am
Sydney, read the heading of this Blog. I think it says that Leonard Cohen is not a good man. I suppose that’s some form of coverage for the folk singer from hell. I am not in Mexico but am emailing the IRS and FBI your latest posts about them and my so-called whereabouts.
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:31 am
One can only hope, Kelly Green. What a miracle to view a web site covering Leonard Cohen and not be deluged with threats and bullshit from Kelley. I think you’re right, she does watch too much TV. Perhaps her current location in Mexico will find her at least a bit restricted when it comes to internet access. Again, one can only hope. Can you believe the crap she’s posting to Blogonaut? If she keeps posting stuff like that, the cops will come and take her away, and it would be good riddance to bad trash.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:16 am
Bill Pavelic
Responder
de Kelley Lynch
para STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
cc doronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha 26 de noviembre de 2009 01:15
asunto Bill Pavelic
enviado por gmail.com
Siempre se muestran las imágenes de este remitente. No volver a mostrar a partir de ahora
ocultar detalles 01:15 (0 minutos antes)
Bill Pavelic,
You informed Gianelli that I’m a very disturbed woman. How would you know who or what I am? I’ve never met you. The fact that you wrote to this “asshole” is all I need to know about you. Did you also write to Gianelli to explain your public allegations that you, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in Phil Spector’s set up? I mean - after all, Bill - we’re playing big time games here and my sons are literate. I’ll speak to Phillip directly about your email to Gianelli-Blogonaut. I would assume you understand that Phillip will be interested in why Gianelli lied to the FBI about me and phoned Investigator Frayeh.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.
Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:41 am
de Kelley Lynch
para STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
cc doronweinberg@aol.com,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
attorney.general@state.co.us,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
lhank@bouldercounty.org,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com
fecha 26 de noviembre de 2009 01:39
asunto Re: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
enviado por gmail.com
Siempre se muestran las imágenes de este remitente. No volver a mostrar a partir de ahora
ocultar detalles 01:39 (1 minuto antes)
To the FBI and IRS,
Why would I be held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI? Is that a game? No. Kelly Green, Gianelli-Blogonaut are not playing a game. They are dead set on undermining my credibility. And Gianelli-Blogonaut has targeted Rutger who was attacked by Sydney today.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 5:43 am
For the record, “this” is not my sexual fantasy - as you publicly posted Gianelli-Blogonaut. And this is no game. I hate noted that you contacted Rutger today and absolutely view that as a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/WuBGzfsExtV/Phil+Spector+Trial+Continues/bUh_gHkRpRs/Pat+Dixon
November 26th, 2009 at 8:09 am
Ms: Lynch:
You sent us 51 emails yesterday and we replied to several.
Surely this is not “a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.”
In any event, you have lost this argument as you typically do, with your lack of logic and common sense as well as your signature hyperbole and exaggerated claims of persecution.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:14 am
PS: Spamming this site with 16 posts in a row does not change the fact that you lost the argument, it merely reinforces it.
November 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Blogonaut, I believe she lives to argue. Trouble is, she doesn’t understand even the basics of logical argument. It’s too bad she has no family left who would be willing to spend Thanksgiving with her. Oh, well, the penalty fits the multiple crimes. Kelly Green, that’s a good idea about Homeland Security. If anyone poses a terrorist threat to anyone it’s our dear Kelley. Time to cook for Thanksgiving. Happy Thanksgiving Kelly and Blogonaut.
November 26th, 2009 at 11:37 am
I haven’t spammed this site Blogonaut-Gianelli and the site can and should speak for itself. I have emailed them and advised them to maintain the IP address information. Had your crowd not descended I wouldn’t have posted one additional cmoment. However, since I am being slandered, lied about, targeted, and Rutger has now been dragged into it I will address every single fraudulent allegation - regardless of how many posts that requires. This is very very straightforward as are your attempts to witness tamper, undermine my credibility as a witness, and derail any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen. Your attempts to determine what the IRS is doing is dead obvious - hence your call to Agent Wynar where you lied to the FBI that I was “spamming” Agent Sopko (who you are now referring to as my “pet” agent which is pathetic, lame and crass) and email to Agent Sopko. You have publicly stated what they have told you and they will each receive a subpoena and have to take the witness stand and testify to your conversations with them. I would assume the calls with the FBI were recorded because I believe the FBI policy is to record all conversations. That means there will be an accurate recording and transcript reflecting what was actually discussed. I find it somewhat difficult to believe that Agent Wynar would slander me because we are strangers but if he did he will have to take responsibility for that. The same holds true for Agent Sopko who has not asked me to remove her from my emails although Joff Belark suggested in his email to me that she did.
Contacting Rutger is, to me, evidence that he is also being targeted. Please note: David Moorhead felt he was a material witness for Phil Spector. I know he’s a witness in my future matters. I also happen to believe he is being attacked and threatened - on this Blog and in your emaiils, Joff Belark’s email to him, etc.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 8:14 am
PS: Spamming this site with 16 posts in a row does not change the fact that you lost the argument, it merely reinforces it.
November 26th, 2009 at 11:43 am
Gianelli-Blogonaut, Thank you for confirming that you have received my emails and read my posts addressing your slander, lies, fraudulent allegations, and the lengths you have gone to undermine my credibility. Of course you don’t know me. You have pointed the lengths I, in turn, have had to go to bring the truth to your attention. You should understand how this applies to slander, libel, and defamation laws. You do represent yourself to be a lawyer. No, my emails to you are not a threat, intimidation, or witness tampering. They are addressing those activities that you - and others have engaged in and continue to engage in.
The argument is not over. It is going to continue in a court of law. I’m documenting evidence of my allegations. I think there is a real possibility that the IRS intends to prosecute Cohen for his tax fraud (I was told is criminal) with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I also happen to believe that’s why they, the FBI, DOJ, and Treasury are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting the tax fraud - and the conduct of law enforcement and government officials. That prosecution may not be public right now but that does not mean that it’s not pending. I don’t think it’s logical to conclude that the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and/or Treasury are copied in for frivolous reasons. In fact, I think that’s absurd to assume.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 8:09 am
Ms: Lynch:
You sent us 51 emails yesterday and we replied to several.
Surely this is not “a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.”
In any event, you have lost this argument as you typically do, with your lack of logic and common sense as well as your signature hyperbole and exaggerated claims of persecution.
November 26th, 2009 at 11:46 am
Sydney, I know the basics of logical argument - including the Tibetan basics. They are brilliant at debate. One basic fact is your position must be true and factual. Another - you cannot be on every side of every argument.
How would you know where I am spending Thanksgiving and whether or not I will be with family members? You don’t know me and you don’t know my family.
Preposterous and gratuitous remark about Homeland Security. It wasn’t a good point on the part of Kelly Green either because I am not and have not recently been in Mexico.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Blogonaut, I believe she lives to argue. Trouble is, she doesn’t understand even the basics of logical argument. It’s too bad she has no family left who would be willing to spend Thanksgiving with her. Oh, well, the penalty fits the multiple crimes. Kelly Green, that’s a good idea about Homeland Security. If anyone poses a terrorist threat to anyone it’s our dear Kelley. Time to cook for Thanksgiving. Happy Thanksgiving Kelly and Blogonaut.
November 26th, 2009 at 11:51 am
Blogonaut-Gianelli, I don’t think you are in a position to define logical. You have lied to the FBI and I believe you know you are witness tampering and attempting to undermine my credibility as a potential prominent government witness. I don’t see much common sense in that particularly as you are well aware that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Agent Sopko - the Treasury, the DOJ, and FBI are copied in on my emails. Those emails, as you also know, are documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud. I guess Agent Sopko and/or Agent Wynar weren’t able to give you the details you wanted about Cohen’s probable and/or possible pending tax fraud matter. That’s a logical conclusion - based on common sense.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 8:09 am
Ms: Lynch:
You sent us 51 emails yesterday and we replied to several.
Surely this is not “a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.”
In any event, you have lost this argument as you typically do, with your lack of logic and common sense as well as your signature hyperbole and exaggerated claims of persecution.
November 26th, 2009 at 12:46 pm
On the contrary Ms. Lynch, logic is our game.
BTW, copying scores of public officials (including the federal employees you mention in your post) does not give your emails any greater credibility nor does it constitute an endorsement by any of them of your wacky views. But somehow you believe that it does. This evinces a logical disconnect.
A prime example of you logical disconnect is in your letter that formed the basis for this post. You end it by stating that Cohen expects that “Phil Spector and I will take the fall for him.”
Even if one buys your tripe about Cohen “destroying your life” (we do not) it is hard to see how you have made a case that Phil Spector’s current incarceration on murder charges is in any way related to Leonard Cohen–let alone the claim that Spector “took the fall” for Cohen. Are you saying that Cohen murdered Lana Clarkson or set up Spector to take that “fall”?
This is about as logical as you pulling the phrase “prominent government witness” from the sentence “No case that featured Lynch as a prominent government witness could go forward because she is not credible” and (as you did several times above) exclaiming “see, you admit that I am a ‘prominent government witness’”. No, the poster said just the opposite.
Finally, Ms. Lynch, we have now received over 60 emails from you in slightly over 24 hours–literally around the clock.
It is easy to see why judges in two states issued civil harassment orders against you. You don’t know when to stop, or how much is to much.
Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
November 26th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
I don’t believe logic is your strong point but I am aware that this is a game for you.
I am not attempting to have the federal government, or anyone else, endorse my allegations and/or positions. I am documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal) and being dragged into Phil Spector’s deranged set up. I think I’ve been clear about this and your attempts to twist this is not going to work. That’s why I will address every lie you utter. Here’s what I believe - the federal government, and in particular the IRS, should take allegations of criminal tax fraud supported by evidence and witnesses very very seriously. Are you arguing other - illogically and irrationally? The penalties and interest, on three companies alone, came to approximately $30 million. Cohen himself has raised the “massive tax hit” as a very real issue so what you are saying is truly twisted logic.
Cohen has apparently perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury (if Mick Brown was correct when he wrote me that Cohen testified against Phillip - reversing his position that his comments about Phillip over the years were good rock ‘n roll stories (and confirmed for the detectives I met). He has publicly slandered me and lied about me. His lawyer filed a Declaration in my son’s custody matter - which is nothing other than witness tampering and an attempt to obstruct justice, coercion, blackmail, etc. My son witnessed a conversation about criminal tax fraud, missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that Cohen “stole” (please refer to the corporate indexes you were interested in the other day), and their threats. Cohen has attempted to protect himself, cover up what I am convinced is criminal activity, and I am convinced he has used the Phil Spector murder trial to do that. It’s not a logical disconnect. People get this - I was probably dragged to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector (and the entire file was falsified) in order to determine what I knew about Phil Spector and guns and to undermine me as a witness for the IRS, etc. Only the day before the SWAT incident, Kory wrote me about his extensive negotiating powers (keep in mind that I was offered 50% community property in front of witnesses) and raised issues about the IRS demanding information on issues going back many years. It is illogical, therefore, to conclude that there are not tax issues. Furthermore, Kory personally advised my lawyers - who put this in writing - that he didn’t have a handle on the tax issues and was concerned about even requesting copies of the Traditional Holdings tax returns from the IRS. You do not have the evidence I have sent to the IRS and others - including Westin’s memorandums that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings was “dangerous” to the structure and real concern that an “astute agent” would notice a disregard for form and overturn the entity. What does that tell you? You’re a lawyer. Therefore, your position is ludicrous - if not insane.
I could care less what you do or don’t buy - including your absurd lie that I owned a $30,000 Birkin bag which I did not. I am merely addressing your lies, slander, defamation, and assaults on my reputation. These issues are going to be raised in court and the burden of proof will fall on you. Truth, as you must know, is the defense to slander. You are standing on lies.
If Cohen perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury then Cohen assisted the District Attorney in obtaining an indictment. He is a very calculated man and an excellent pathelogical liar and his testimony would have carried tremendous weight. Please keep in mind that he has been referred to in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine so he has been used against Phillip publicly in an attempt to gain a conviction.
How sickening. Cohen didn’t murder Clarkson. She obviously shot herself. You are a sick and twisted individual and I am convinced that you are dangerously unstable although I understand your motive(s). Phil Spector is a genius. He has huge attorneys behind him and they are very very serious men and women. He has five of the greatest forensic scientist in the country on record stating that Clarkson shot herself. I believe the Appeals Court will see right through this situation and reverse the conviction. You yourself have mentioned the insanity with the 1101 evidence issues. And there are many serious issues for an appeal. The venerable Dennis Riordan, as you refer to him, is no doubt preparing a stunning appeal and brilliant document.
Why shouldn’t I pull the phrase “prominent government witness” out of the sentence you have just quoted? That is precisely what it states. No case that we are aware of publicly is a better way to refer to the potential IRS prosecution of Cohen.
Who really cares what a bunch of liars with motive conclude? I’m just documenting your lies and slander, addressing them, and setting the record straight.
Kelley Lynch
This is about as logical as you pulling the phrase “prominent government witness” from the sentence “No case that featured Lynch as a prominent government witness could go forward because she is not credible” and (as you did several times above) exclaiming “see, you admit that I am a ‘prominent government witness’”. No, the poster said just the opposite.
Finally, Ms. Lynch, we have now received over 60 emails from you in slightly over 24 hours–literally around the clock.
It is easy to see why judges in two states issued civil harassment orders against you. You don’t know when to stop, or how much is to much.
Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
November 26th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
For the record, I will send you as many emails as need be in order to address your lies and slander. Your emails are evidence of harassment - including the “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” series. Mine are addressing very serious and very real issues.
I didn’t show up for Cohen’s first fraudulent restraining order matter in Los Angeles because I intend to use that as evidence against him in the future. I showed up in Boulder, Colorado, to nail the fact that I believe Ronald Mitchell was acting in collusion with Cohen and to address the fact that all issues between me and Cohen stem from the fact that I reported his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. There was no need to convert any matter into an IRS matter. The adversarial position I am now in with respect to Cohen is solely due to the fact that I refused to be bribed (50% community property) or coerced (Ray’s custody matter, etc.) into making an illegal deal - presumably in an attempt to have me testify that Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. Cohen has a grave disdain for ordinary tax returns and that’s one of the reasons, from my perspective, that he does not live in Canada where - according to a brilliant attorney (my former brother-in-law) there are serious residence (and tax) issues.
Civil harassment orders are a dime a dozen. I wouldn’t go near Cohen if he paid me $10 million. The man gives me the creeps and is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency - whatsoever. I know - I worked with him for approximately 20 years.
Kelley Lynch
Finally, Ms. Lynch, we have now received over 60 emails from you in slightly over 24 hours–literally around the clock.
It is easy to see why judges in two states issued civil harassment orders against you. You don’t know when to stop, or how much is to much.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
P.S. That’s why I didn’t attend the meeting Cohen came to at my lawyers offices - with Richard Westin, Riccardo Cestero, Anjani Thomas, and Lorca Cohen. I informed my lawyers that I would never set foot near this maniac again. I am waiting to address everything legally. I will not use rotten legal tactics - such as fraudulent restraining orders in an attempt to silence the truth. I will not have to perjure himself as Cohen has, repeatedly, and I will not target minor children - as Cohen and Kory did when Robert Kory filed a Declaration in Ray’s custody matter in retaliation for the fact that he witnessed a very serious conversation about tax fraud, theft, and threats. I also won’t withhold information and didn’t steal from Cohen. He stole from me and the corporate books, records, notarized documents, stock certificates, and a complete forensic accounting (that I would like to give the IRS) will prove this. I also won’t issue illegal K1s and make someone an illegal partner on any entity but I will prove that this is precisely what Cohen has done. This is how Cohen has decided to address his “massive tax hit” which arose solely due to his grave and utter disdain for ordinary income taxes. His demands that all deals be done as stock deals was preposterous and costly - to him. It also lowered my commission (which you added $1 million to - quite a hefty exaggeration/lie) substantially. And, Cohen, Greenberg, Westin were wrapped in attorney/client privilege - essentially leaving me in the dark.
I also think the IRS will want to address the $1 million and $7 million 1099s that were issued and then reissued as $0 1099s. I know the Ogden, Utah IRS agent was attempting to address the $1 million deposit that was not a “loan” and audits were beginning to become issues.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand”
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:17 AM
subject Re: More Lies And Nonsense From Gianelli-Blogonaut, Syndney And The Crowd From Phil Spector’s Appeal Watch On Blogonaut
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:17 AM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
I wonder why Gianelli-Blogonaut’s so interested in Leonard Cohen’s role in Phillip’s matter. Clearly, if he perjured himself in the grand jury, that opens the indictment up to attack. Obviously, that is a deadly serious issue that people understand. The lies about a Birkin bag, my lifestyle, and the fraudulent restraining orders are not going to change the facts of this situation. I guess the IRS doesn’t want to know why Cohen received $1 million and $7 million 1099s from Sony which were then corrected to $0 1099s. Cohen has now successfully proven - based on fraud and perjury (because I was not a trustee) that these assets were his. He has proven that I was defrauded and this is supported by the corporate documents. Traditional Holdings, LLC has now issued him an $8 million 1099 for all the assets that should have gone into Traditional Holdings, LLC - addressing the income, his loans, distributions (regardless of their nature and/or characterization), and wasted assets including his transaction fees and one payment for the failed CAK bond deal. Cohen himself signed the fax to Greenberg authorizing payment of these transaction fees. I tend to doubt “illiteracy” is a defense - particularly since this man is a writer and the written word is his weapon.
All the best,
Kelley
November 26th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM
subject Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:22 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Blogonaut-Gianelli is playing a game with logic - see below. He wants to know if Cohen murdered Lana Clarkson. He is a lame, vicious idiot. Even Boies Schiller understood that Cohen was attempting to blame his civil and/or criminal wrongdoing on me. They made an excellent point - why would Leonard Cohen make Kelley Lynch an enemy? Because of his disdain for ordinary income taxes - that’s why. Otherwise, he would have gone to the IRS with me.
All the best,
Kelley
November 26th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
“Civil harassment orders are a dime a dozen.”
Really? I don’t have a single acquaintance who has had one issued against them, let alone two.
Moreover, if what you are saying was true, you would not have telephoned Cohen and left him voice messages when you initially fled to New Jersey after the September, 2008 civil harassment restraining order was issued.
You are so obsessed with Leonard Cohen that you literally spend 18 hours a day, every day, blogging and sending emails to hundreds of strangers about Cohen—sometimes writing them ten and fifteen times a day.
And you are so ill that you cannot see that sending someone 60 emails in one day is clearly excessive and over the line into harassment.
Clearly you cannot help yourself.
Last, do you see the inconsistency in combining the assertions that “is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency - whatsoever” with the phrase “I worked with him for approximately 20 years”?
Unless you were utterly desperate for a job, a reasonable person would find it hard to believe that was your opinion of Cohen for the 20 years he employed you as his manager.
In any event, I am done with this post and it is time for me to drive to our friend’s house in Sonoma for Thanksgiving dinner.
Adios, Ms. Lynch.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Mick Brown
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:36 AM
subject Re: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:36 AM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
People are overwhelmed when they hear the amounts. This is a game for Gianelli-Blogonaut who appears to be out of touch with reality. What happens if the IRS does endorse my viewpoints or allegations? I don’t see how that is problematic. Many many people are wondering why Cohen hasn’t been arrested and prosecuted. Of course, Phil Spector knows if Cohen testified against him in his grand jury and I have no idea why Mick Brown would just decide to write and lie to me about that. I understand why Sharmapa has serious issues with Mick Brown but to simply make up a story about receiving a packaging containing grand jury testimony seems truly bizarre. Cohen does, however, absolutely appear in at least one public document (Motion in Limine) filed by the prosecutors in Phillip’s matter. There is a reason for that and it will be hard to reconcile with what he told the detectives I met - that his comments about Phillip over the years were good rock ‘n roll comments. It’s interesting that Gianelli-Blogonaut can read but willfully disregards all relevant points - and he’s a self-proclaimed lawyer who I believe should also be disbarred for what is going on here. I also want to know how extensive his contacts with Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers, and others relevant to my matters are - including Investigator Frayeh. To assume that Phil Spector will not want to know what is going on with Gianelli-Blogonaut with respect to me and specifically as it relates to Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and Investigator Frayeh is absurd and sheer lunacy. Even a school child could understand this.
Mr. Spector has clearly stated that he was framed. Leonard Cohen appears to be involved in that situation.
All the best,
Kelley
BTW, copying scores of public officials (including the federal employees you mention in your post) does not give your emails any greater credibility nor does it constitute an endorsement by any of them of your wacky views. But somehow you believe that it does. This evinces a logical disconnect.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Jewel of Activity ,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Mick Brown
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM
subject Re: Mark Beckner, Chief of Police, Boulder
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:41 AM (0 minutes ago)
P.P.S. From now on I’ll use “We Tip” dot com.
- Hide quoted text -
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
P.S. Hang onto Gianelli and/or Belark’s email communication with Boulder PD about Rutger. I definitely intend to subpoena that and if you think otherwise you should speak to an attorney yourself. I will most definitely address the fraudulent restraining order in Boulder and that’s why I appeared and filed a Motion to Quash. I don’t think I am done challenging Cohen’s perjury in his Declaration or the process server’s perjury and other issues - such as “Ronald Mitchell.” Boulder PD wasn’t able to investigate John/Jeff’s public allegations at the Boulder Hostel that he murdered a 15 year old, was he? Klauss, a police officer I volunteered with at the Birds of Prey, thought this was an incredibly serious matter that demanded an investigation because, as he put it, there is no way I personally could determine if it was the truth. His conduct supported the fact that he appeared to be a dangerous man. There are witnesses to this.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hi Mark,
As Chief of Police of Boulder PD what do you think happens when a “cop” harasses someone who is the victim of a fraudulent restraining order? It exposes them to liability.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
If you don’t know anyone with a civil restraining order you must not know anyone involved in a marital and/or custody dispute. They are the de riguer rotten legal tactic of the day and I believe they are unconstitutional and will challenge them on that basis. There is a landmark case in New Jersey that has begun to challenge these “pre-crime” crystal ball tactics.
I didn’t flee to New Jersey.
I have addressed the reasons for my emails and posts and you have confirmed that you read and understand federal agencies and parties are copied in on my emails which are not harassment. That is not true of emails that are merely meant to harass me - such as “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” which serve no other purpose. A jury can decide these issues.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
“Civil harassment orders are a dime a dozen.”
Really? I don’t have a single acquaintance who has had one issued against them, let alone two.
Moreover, if what you are saying was true, you would not have telephoned Cohen and left him voice messages when you initially fled to New Jersey after the September, 2008 civil harassment restraining order was issued.
You are so obsessed with Leonard Cohen that you literally spend 18 hours a day, every day, blogging and sending emails to hundreds of strangers about Cohen—sometimes writing them ten and fifteen times a day.
And you are so ill that you cannot see that sending someone 60 emails in one day is clearly excessive and over the line into harassment.
Clearly you cannot help yourself.
Last, do you see the inconsistency in combining the assertions that “is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency - whatsoever” with the phrase “I worked with him for approximately 20 years”?
Unless you were utterly desperate for a job, a reasonable person would find it hard to believe that was your opinion of Cohen for the 20 years he employed you as his manager.
In any event, I am done with this post and it is time for me to drive to our friend’s house in Sonoma for Thanksgiving dinner.
Adios, Ms. Lynch.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
P.S. Why I worked for Cohen is none of your business and not an issue.
Last, do you see the inconsistency in combining the assertions that “is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency - whatsoever” with the phrase “I worked with him for approximately 20 years”?
Unless you were utterly desperate for a job, a reasonable person would find it hard to believe that was your opinion of Cohen for the 20 years he employed you as his manager.
November 26th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
I’ll spend 24 hours a day, if necessary, addressing his lies, slander, fraud, and the fact that he targeted my children and parents and probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s matter. I have credible and extensive evidence of my job searches so I think a jury will understand this. I have no interest, whatsoever, in Cohen. I worked with him for 20 years and remain unimpressed. It was a job. I had two children to support. Not everyone likes the person who they work for. You might tolerate them, however. And, just because someone is a celebrity does not mean that they are a decent human being. Are you speaking for the world now, Gianelli-Blogonaut? When and if someone has asked to be removed from my emails I have done that promptly when possible. Now and then I have inadvertently sent an errant email or failed to remove someone. I then followed up and pointed this out to them or visa versa. I have documented this. What’s really irrational and illogical is your obsession with me, Cohen, and the Phil Spector matter. Your communication with Alan Jackson is of the utmost importance to me - as is your call to Investigator Frayeh. Your lies to the FBI will be explored in a court of law. You have publicly stated what Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko have told you. You have publicly stated what Bruce Cutler, Phil Spector’s former attorney, told you. Why you were contacting these parties, and Cohen’s advisers - as you also publicly stated, is worthy of an investigation. I think Phil Spector will agree and I intend to print this Blog out and mail it to him, together with my letter to Jackson, in Prison. You do not speak for Phil Spector and I doubt he authorized you to speak on behalf of his attorneys, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan, who happen to be brilliant men in thieir own right.
Kelley Lynch
You are so obsessed with Leonard Cohen that you literally spend 18 hours a day, every day, blogging and sending emails to hundreds of strangers about Cohen—sometimes writing them ten and fifteen times a day.
November 26th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
For the record, I type over 100 wpm so I don’t spend 18 hours a day responding to your and others lies and slander.
November 26th, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Oh please Lynch give us all a break, at least stop sending us unwanted mails to our private E-mail addresses, you have been asked several times NOT to send me mails, I still receive some every day.
Do you want to hear what I think? No, I din’t think so, but I will tell you anyway.
I do not think anybody is going to sue you for anything, because what is the point?
Either you will not show up in court or if you get a judgement against you, you will just ignore it as “Bogus or fraudulent”
I am absolutely sure you will never sue anybody, and you know it too, you feel some kind of sick “power” with all your threats, don’t you understand that it makes you look like a freaky joke?
I do not believe , the IRS, DJO, FBI, Riordan or Weinberg or “The Holy men” ever read your millions of mails, I believe they have either blocked your mails or put them on “Auto-delete”, they would not have time to do their work if they had to read all your garbage.
I also believe that you thrive on these arguments with “us strangers”, why else would you write on public blogs, you can “document the destruction of our life” on private blogs.
You do not want to hear arguments about your life, your children, your finances “from strangers”, still you expose everything to strangers, what is up with that??
I also believe that you are absolutely obsessed and in love with Leonard Cohen, and the fact that he chose to be with beautiful woman like Rebecca De Mornay and Anjana Tomas instead of you makes you absolutely furious and therefore you had to find all these reasons to “nail” him. Is that not the real truth Kelley?
I do not know if Phil Spector killed that woman and neither do you, maybe not even Spector knows, but it has nothing to do with Leonard Cohen, his remarks 30 years ago has nothing to do with why Spector was convicted.
Please go into your little hole in the wall and write a book or your journal, and let us, who like Leonard Cohen and his work, enjoy that. Your slandering of him is not going to change anybody’s mind about him, on the contrary, anybody who have read your garbage will have even more respect for him than before we had ever heard the name Kelley Lynch, he should be nominated for sainthood being able to be around you for 18 years.
And oh yes, the way you have dragged your children into this public mess is a disgrace and shamefull, you have to be a very unloving and abusive mother to expose them to this humiliation
Now enjoy your Thanksgiving
Susanne
November 26th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Kelley, the length of time your are on-line with your nonsense rantings is indicated every time you post. Try to pay attention now - each time you post, the date and time of that post is shown. Can”t argue with that. You don’t have any power to secrete those numbers. You don’t seem to get that you leave a paper trail everywhere you go. Like I said earlier, if you don’t want people to comment about your posts, keep a secret journal of all this evidence you’re lying about. You can be assured that no one will bother you under those circumstances. No one will miss you…
November 26th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Walsh, save the Thanksgiving insults. I am not emailing you at this time but you seem to think it’s acceptable to contact me - via my private email address - when you see fit. I have informed you that I am addressing your lies, slander, and malicious gossip all intended (obviously) to undermine my credibility. I don’t think any intelligent person would fall for the delusional position that I am spamming or harassing any of you. Gianelli-Blogonaut sent me approximately six positively deranged emails that contained various references to “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.” He has now taken to insulting Agent Kelly Sopko of the Treasury Department by calling her my “pet” agent. Your conduct is immature, lame, malicious, and truly astounding. What emails have you received from me today or yesterday? Post the last few public emails you received from me. I have all my emails and they document all communications with you.
Why would I want to hear what a perfect stranger who has not reviewed evidence thinks? I want to address your lies, gossip, and slander. I will show up in court - do not ever underestimate that. I will write my own legal responses. I will subpoena parties - as I have done in the past. I did not respond to Cohen’s fraudulent lawsuit in Los Angeles because I believed it was an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud as I advised his representatives. I did not appear at his fraudulent restraining order hearing because I wanted to use that as evidence of the tactics being used against me. I showed up at the garbage hearing meant to silence me with respect to the IRS matter (which no one can say with any certainty is or is not pending) and I will show up at every single proceeding from here on out. Underestimate my focus and underestimate my ability to raise funds to attend a hearing anywhere. I also did not participate in Neal Greenberg’s garbage companion suit because I had no interest in the “interpleaded funds” and advised the judge that I would not enter an appearance, that the matter involved criminal tax fraud, and ultimately told him to mail Cohen a check. I will ignore nothing and have ignored nothing. I’ve simply refused to participate in Cohen’s insanity. I would be only too happy to respond to any future garbage involving him, however.
Who cares if you are “sure” I will never sue anybody. I don’t know that because I intend to sue quite a number of parties. Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.
Well, I know for a fact that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff reads my emails because Agent Sopko confirmed this for me in our meeting. Perhaps they are just following what might turn into a Hollywood “blockbuster” as many people have suggested. The IRS caper will be featured in any such story. How would you know if the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Mr. Riordan and Mr. Weinberg (Phil Spector’s attorneys), or various Tibetan lamas (who are my friends and teachers) will ever read or have read my emails. I have now publicly confirmed that Agent Sopko - who is not my “pet” agent and I find that kind of condescending insult offensive for reasons that have nothing to do with Agent Sopko - told me that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading my emails. I was told by her partner that quite a number of people are reading my emails. And, I was told by the Treasury agents that the issues are complicated and was asked to set them forth in writing in a simple manner. I attempted to do that for Mr. Robb Watts/State of Kentucky, who made the same request after we spoke, and believe that letter serves as a basic foundation for understanding these issues. Ann Diamond’s essentially factual article - that needs to be corrected with respect to a number of issues and chronological mistakes - gives a relatively simple overview of the events as they unfolded until a certain point in time. Ms. Diamond wrote that article with the intention of submitting it to Rolling Stone. This apparently upset Cohen who had his lawyers threaten Ms. Diamond and that activity was followed by his flying into Boulder, Colorado - a true act of desperation on his part and evidence, to me, that he is fully aware of his attempts to obstruct justice and the lengths he will go in his attempts to blame his tax fraud on others. Do you have evidence that any of these parties have blocked my emails or have them on auto-delete? You h ave raised the precise issue I have raised - the government resources that have been wasted due to Cohen’s tax fraud and the Phil Spector set up are astounding. If the IRS decides to prosecute Leonard Cohen legal documents have to be prepared and I know for a fact that these are extremely complex tax issues, elaborate corporate scam structures, and truly ugly details. Furthermore, these issues need to be transformed from tax law into dollar amounts. That is a tremendous amount of work and as Gianelli-Blogonaut stated (and is one thing I agree with him about) this would take a team of lawyers and paralegals to deal with. And that does not include the activity that is being expended engaging in what I view as very very serious criminal conduct - including the reality that Phil Spector was set up and the Department of Justice, FBI, and others really should investigate the District Attorney of Los Angeles and other agencies. The bill for that investigation, and any possible prosecutions, should be shared by all the parties with motive who have participated in the Los Angeles “sport” of nailing a celebrity. It’s not all that difficult to read my emails. My friends are and they don’t have any problems, whatsoever, following the logic, story, crimes, and or the fact that federal agencies are copied in and should be undertaking investigations and prosecutions. That translates as: many people in the United States of America are sick of corruption and do not believe that fraudulent celebrities like Leonard Cohen should continue to get away with tax fraud. People are also sick and tired of government corruption and law enforcement misconduct.
You hold yourself in far too high esteem. I find you boring, tedious, monotonous, vicious, malicious, abusive, sophomoric, mean-spirited, unintelligent, and I view you as people with motive to undermine an innocent woman and her children. I personally view you as a cult victim and have been clear about this. I believe you are entertaining yourself with this situation and it has given you some sense of self-importance and fulfills some vulgar need of yours. I wrote a response to an article that appeared on Phawker’s public Blog. They, in turn, printed that. You and your cyber-terrorist crowd descended on this Blog and I have been clear - I will address every single lie, every instance of slander, defamation and libel, and every single fraudulent allegation. I will ultimately use this in a court of law and the burden at that time will be on the liars and slanderers. Do not consider yourself a party to any lawsuit that I will file. I consider you a moronic idiot.
Why would anyone want to hear arguments about their life and their children, their finances, etc. from absolute strangers who are in no position - whatsoever - to argue anything including the fact that I did not own a Birkin bag or live a luxurious life. My finances are no one’s business. My children are my business and I am especially focused on any areas where they are threatened, intimidated, harassed, insulted, and/or slandered. I also do not want to hear your views on whether or not I was Cohen’s “love.” You do not know me. You were not there. He is a liar. He can never prove this. It is not a compliment. It is an intentional lie meant to deceive people and terribly calculated. Who cares what you believe? I’m not interested in Leonard Cohen and he can drop dead (literally) for all I care. The best thing that has happened to me was to be forced into a position where I could walk away from him and Steven Clark Lindsey. Who cares if he was with De Morney. They spent nights arguing about me. I know this because Cohen told me this. She was apparently incredibly jealous of me. DeMornay herself told me that she thought Cohen attempted to sabatage our friendship. We were, at one point, friends. I can assure you that I was not and never will be jealous of Rebecca DeMornay. I won’t comment on Anjani Thomas. No. I didn’t report Leonard Cohen to the IRS because I was jealous. I reported hims because I was told, and believe, he committed criminal tax fraud with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I do, however, think he was jealous and that’s why he went into Lindsey’s office to profess that I had sex with Oliver Stone and Richard Rutowski. He is a jealous, obsessed pervert.
I know that Phil Spector didn’t shoot Lana Clarkson and so do some of the major forensic scientists in this country and possibly the world who concluded that Clarkson shot herself. If Cohen perjured himself in Phillip’s grand jury then the issues are related. He appears in the prosecutor’s Motion in Limine. That is not an innocent matter. Find the grand jury testimony and review Cohen’s. Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that he had copies that were mailed him and stated that Cohen testified. I had no reason to believe he lied to me. If Cohen perjured himself it has everything to do with the indictment.
People have suggested that I write a book about this situation. They have brought up a Hollywood film as well. I am writing a book on Leonard Cohen and my experiences with him. If you choose not to read it I won’t be insulted. I’ll take it as a compliment. Unfortunately, I am telling the truth about Cohen - although I know it is truly ugly and deranged.
Cohen dragged my children into this - as did Steven Clark Lindsey - when he targeted and slandered Rutger and had his lawyer file a Declaration in my son’s custody matter. His lawyer doesn’t know my son. My son, unfortunately, witnessed a conversation between me and Robert Kory about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. You cannot twist those facts. I am not an abusive Mother and this is something that is going to be addressed in Court. Steven Clark Lindsey is an abusive father and Child Services was supposed to send him to anger management. I personally think prison would be a better answer.
For the record, Betsy Superfon told me that Steven Clark Lindsey took Ray away from me to keep him out of Cohen’s tax fraud matter and intended to give him back at a later date. She also told me there was something in it for him (with Cohen) - like money.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
What’s wrong, Sydney? Nothing to post about on Blogonaut’s Phil Spector “watch?” Don’t worry - I’m certain Dennis Riordan (who Blogonaut-Gianelli calls “venerable” but also happens to speak for somehow - although he doesn’t know him but Mr. Riordan may have waved to him once) will file a magnificent appeal that many, many attorneys and lay people will want to read and study. I personally look forward to that.
That’s correct. Each time I post the date and time is shown. Take the total number of words and figure in that I type 100 wpm and you will have the precise time I have spent addressing your lies, slander, defamation, libel, and fraudulent allegations. It’s very very simple math. I am intentionally creating a paper trail that documents precisely what is going on here and on other internet sites and via emails. Pay close attention to that, Sydney. I intend to use these documents in a court of law. I have already advised Phawker that I intend to subpoena the IP address information and have asked them to maintain that information. At that time, I will turn it over to Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agent Sopko - the Treasury, and the news media copied in on my public emails documenting the destruction of my life. I will also subpoena all communications between Gianelli-Blogonaut and the District Attorney of Los Angeles, Alan Jackson, Donna Clarkson and her legal team, Leonard Cohen and his advisers or friends, my so-called former friends, and others. Blogonaut-Gianelli is clear on this and should not attempt to destroy evidence.
I am writing a book about Leonard Cohen. I am documenting your lies and slander on this Blog. You descended on this site and your motive is clearly to undermine my credibility and attack my children. I see that you’re frustrated that you can’t silence me.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Alan Jackson and Gianelli-Blogonaut: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity
cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
Paul Burger ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM
subject Alan Jackson and Gianelli-Blogonaut: Do Not Destroy Any
Communications Relating To These Matters
cc: Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Agent Sopko - the Treasury Department
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
What’s wrong, Sydney? Nothing to post about on Blogonaut’s Phil Spector “watch?” Don’t worry - I’m certain Dennis Riordan (who Blogonaut-Gianelli calls “venerable” but also happens to speak for somehow - although he doesn’t know him but Mr. Riordan may have waved to him once) will file a magnificent appeal that many, many attorneys and lay people will want to read and study. I personally look forward to that.
That’s correct. Each time I post the date and time is shown. Take the total number of words and figure in that I type 100 wpm and you will have the precise time I have spent addressing your lies, slander, defamation, libel, and fraudulent allegations. It’s very very simple math. I am intentionally creating a paper trail that documents precisely what is going on here and on other internet sites and via emails. Pay close attention to that, Sydney. I intend to use these documents in a court of law. I have already advised Phawker that I intend to subpoena the IP address information and have asked them to maintain that information. At that time, I will turn it over to Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agent Sopko - the Treasury, and the news media copied in on my public emails documenting the destruction of my life. I will also subpoena all communications between Gianelli-Blogonaut and the District Attorney of Los Angeles, Alan Jackson, Donna Clarkson and her legal team, Leonard Cohen and his advisers or friends, my so-called former friends, and others. Blogonaut-Gianelli is clear on this and should not attempt to destroy evidence.
I am writing a book about Leonard Cohen. I am documenting your lies and slander on this Blog. You descended on this site and your motive is clearly to undermine my credibility and attack my children. I see that you’re frustrated that you can’t silence me.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Kelley, the length of time your are on-line with your nonsense rantings is indicated every time you post. Try to pay attention now - each time you post, the date and time of that post is shown. Can”t argue with that. You don’t have any power to secrete those numbers. You don’t seem to get that you leave a paper trail everywhere you go. Like I said earlier, if you don’t want people to comment about your posts, keep a secret journal of all this evidence you’re lying about. You can be assured that no one will bother you under those circumstances. No one will miss you…
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-213588
November 26th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Put up or shut up Kelley.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Sydney said…
I have to admire a son who can display emotional detachment and at the same time display unconditional love. This may not be visible to others, but I can relate to his stand on neutrality. He clearly is commenting on the man and not the father; and for that to happen, acceptance of his father right or wrong is the best gift he can give to PS. I don’t pretend to know all the facts or rumors regarding this situation, but I find this letter touching.
September 10, 2009 11:14 AM
Sydney said…
This really illustrates the concept that one can love someone completely, but dislike their behavior or way of life. If people could apply this, I suspect there would be fewer divorces and fewer runaways.
September 10, 2009 1:30 PM
Post a Comment On: Blogonaut
“PHIL SPECTOR SON SAYS HOW HE FEELS ABOUT RACHELLE, BLOGONAUT”
35 Comments -
blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com
November 26th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Getting anxious, Sydney? You are becoming increasingly aggressive - I note.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Well, Sydney, at least you admit that you don’t know any facts. You also have not reviewed the evidence I sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Would you like to publicly comment on why Agent Sopko and her partner told me, when we met, that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is reading my emails. That didn’t appear to be a game - to them - from what I could tell. Why would Agent Sopko, Intelligence at the U.S. Treasury Department - fly into Santa Ana, California to meet with me? Why did the Denver Duty Agent tell me to let the IRS take the lead and they would be brought in if there was criminal evidence or witness tampering? Any thoughts on that?
Kelley Lynch
P.S. I trust Janis Zavala Spector’s views on what occurred between Phil Spector, Ronnie Spector, and their children. Phil Spector is a wonderful Father. Leonard Cohen himself publicly noted that he was delightful with children. He has a wonderful daughter, Nicole Spector, who is evidence of her parents and how they raised her. And, they had a wonderful son and brother, Phillip, Jr. who I knew and loved. I do know the facts and I know that Phil and Janis Zavala Spector were wonderful to me when I was raising Rutger. I cherish that moment in time. That would have been from 1988-1989 (nearly full time) through around the time that Ray was born in 1992 - and then from time to time thereafter. They remain my dear friends and since you don’t know them you cannot speak for them. Janis Zavala Spector was convinced that Phillip would want to lend me money, if he could, to hire a custody lawyer. She knows him well enough to understand that in the middle of his murder trial insanity he would help another human being.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
Yes, yes dream on Lynch, you will never subponea anybody, never sue anybody, never write a book or movie(Hollywood block buster oh give me a break) nobody cares about you and your twisted mind, and yes just today I receive three of your sick mails, I will return them to you .
You are truely boring and malicious and plain disturbed, the good thing is that nobody even have to try to undermine your credibility, you do such a great job of that yourself.
Yes I still believe none of the lawyers or “holy men” or public offices ever read any of your nut mails, I also believe Phil Spector would probably say “Kelley who?” if your name was mentioned to him, and yes I absolutely believe that you are very jeloux of the woman in Leonard Cohen life, you just did not meassure up, and it is to see why.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
From November 25, 2009 at 3:52 am through this morning, November 26, 2009 at 10:17 am we have now received a cumulative 96 emails from Kelley Lynch. (The emails briefly stopped between 2:01 am and 7:22 am this morning.
These emails were also copied to the IRS, the Justice Department, agent Sopko, and others.
This is in addition to the scores of posts on this site during the same time period.
I would call that obsessed with Leonard Cohen.
Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Walsh, you do not know me; you did not know Leonard Cohen for the 20 years I worked with him; you have not reviewed the evidence; you are not a citizen of the United States; you intuitively spoke for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan. I will indeed subpoena information and I will litigate these issues. I could care less if you or anyone believes that. I have spoken with attorneys about these matters and I am clear on the issues, statutes, laws, etc.
I am writing a book presently on Leonard Cohen. It is irrelevant to me if you believe that or read it. I have spent nearly 20 years watching and observing this man and I see right through him. I know his children and to say I was “helpful” raising Lorca is true understatement. I fed her. She was at my house every night. I drove her to school. My step-daughter and nephew lived with her. My friends were her friends - for instance, Vajra Rich.
Publicly post my emails. That will break the argument and will serve as conclusive evidence. I will concede the point when you have successfully proven it.
How would you know if I’m credible or not? I’m an absolute stranger to you. Cohen himself told Betsy Superfon in the spring of 2005 that I am the love of his life. He also told her he was terrified and remorseful. Care to comment on that?
Who cares what you believe? I see you are attempting to subtly insult Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche with your insulting “holy men” remark. I have noted (and captured the comments) that my friends and teachers were slandered on Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog and demeaned on Blogonaut-Gianelli’s Blog. And now you speak for Phil Spector. I think Mr. Spector himself should personally respond. If I need to subponena him (due to the fact that he’s in prison) I will do so.
I think Leonard Cohen’s a perverted fraud, calculated liar, and talentless creep. I have felt this way for years. He is one of the greediest men I have ever met in my life. He is an ego maniac and control freak who orchestrates everything and is the driving force behind what has unfolded. I would have measured up if he had been able to coerce/bribe/blackmail me into accepting an illegal deal (such as his offer of 50% community property; $10,000/month “walking around money, etc.) and testified (perjured myself actually) that his advisers (some of whom are probably innocent of that allegation but should be permitted to testify to what they witnessed and what they think occurred) defrauded him.
Do you know Anjani Thomas? I found her boring, talentless, over-inflated, unattractive, annoying, gossipy, uneducated, utterly ambitious, and dull. I know that she was able to get a house out of Cohen really quickly and I would assume that the people I gave my email passwords to (the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, etc.) have read her emails to me and are surprised that they are even together. Witnesses could not believe what she said publicly about Leonard Cohen. But since you probably don’t know her (and didn’t when I knew her) you can’t address these issues, can you? I also think she dresses slutty and think she’s really embarrassing. This is just truthful and I’ll get into more personal details in my book.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Actually, my emails to you are addressing your conduct which includes lying about me publicly; following me around the internet (look at the chronology of posts above as evidence of this), slandering me, and attempting to undermine my credibility. It’s bizarre behavior for someone who does not know me and it is utterly obsessive. A jury can and will draw their own conclusions. When you remove all posts about me on Blogonaut’s Blog and immediately cease and desist contacting me by email; contacting my son, sister, and brother-in-law by email, and publicly lying about me I will stop addressing these issues. I have been clear about this.
You are correct: these emails are addressed to and copied to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko who you have insultingly referred to as my “pet.” What’s your point? That I reported Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and am now documenting the destruction of my life for them and others. They haven’t asked me to remove them from my emails and that includes Agent Kelly Sopko. Why would that be?
I thought you were going to Sonoma for Thanksgiving - as you publicly noted earlier today? Are you so obsessed with me and this situation that you are at a Thanksgiving celebration with friends and on the internet following this insanity and lying? That’s truly incredible.
You guarantee me that Leonard Cohen won’t be raised as an issue with Phil Spector? He appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine and I believe Mick Brown was truthful when he told me that Cohen testified against Phillip in the grand jury. Are you now speaking for Phil Spector? You know what Phil Spector plans to do, right? How? You do not know Phil Spector. Chris/Homeland Security (who I spoke with) was able to tell me that he thought the District Attorney and/or Governor’s Office was behind much of what I was going through - that included the SWAT Team and Killer King incident where I was questioned about Phil Spector. That entire file is, as you well know, falsified. Chris was a very professional, highly intelligent, and thoughtful individual and I was very very relieved to note that Homeland Security has employees like this. He was truthful, matter of fact, and seemed to know what he was talking about. You, on the other hand, sound like a pathetic liar who is obsessed with me, the Phil Spector matter, and all over the Cohen tax fraud matter. I’ll quote you to Mr. Spector. As I’ve said I am printing out this Blog and its contents and mailing it to Phillip.
Kelley Lynch
Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
What happend to the two or three other books you have been threatening to write in the past few months? You better get started if you have to write all these books and movies and sue all these people, how do you have time to sit and “blog” all day
November 26th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Obsessed All Right - He’s Weighing In (Apparently From His Friend’s House in Sonoma)
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity
cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
Paul Burger ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
dbergman@bergman-law.com
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:16 PM
subject Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Obsessed All Right - He’s Weighing In (Apparently From His Friend’s House in Sonoma)
Hi Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
I agree with Gianelli-Blogonaut on this point: Phillip is going to win on appeal and that’s why everyone is so focused on me and my public comments. For the record, Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated that Phillip will not address issues relating to me and/or Leonard Cohen in connection with his various matters. That is preposterous and absurd. Then again, Gianelli-Blogonaut is a liar with motive who has lied to the FBI, was in communication with Alan Jackson, was in communication with Leonard Cohen’s advisers, contacted Investigator Frayeh, seems to have information on how Pat Dixon feels about me, contacted Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar - no doubt in an attempt to determine what the IRS has planned in terms of a potential federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen. And, is dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential prominent government witness. Actually - Gianelli-Blogonaut stated that he guarantees I won’t be raised (and neither will Cohen) on appeal. First of all, how would he know. It’s speculative. Gianelli-Blogonaut now speaks for Phil Spector. That’s incredible.
Love,
Kelley
“Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.”
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Actually, my emails to you are addressing your conduct which includes lying about me publicly; following me around the internet (look at the chronology of posts above as evidence of this), slandering me, and attempting to undermine my credibility. It’s bizarre behavior for someone who does not know me and it is utterly obsessive. A jury can and will draw their own conclusions. When you remove all posts about me on Blogonaut’s Blog and immediately cease and desist contacting me by email; contacting my son, sister, and brother-in-law by email, and publicly lying about me I will stop addressing these issues. I have been clear about this.
You are correct: these emails are addressed to and copied to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko who you have insultingly referred to as my “pet.” What’s your point? That I reported Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and am now documenting the destruction of my life for them and others. They haven’t asked me to remove them from my emails and that includes Agent Kelly Sopko. Why would that be?
I thought you were going to Sonoma for Thanksgiving - as you publicly noted earlier today? Are you so obsessed with me and this situation that you are at a Thanksgiving celebration with friends and on the internet following this insanity and lying? That’s truly incredible.
You guarantee me that Leonard Cohen won’t be raised as an issue with Phil Spector? He appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine and I believe Mick Brown was truthful when he told me that Cohen testified against Phillip in the grand jury. Are you now speaking for Phil Spector? You know what Phil Spector plans to do, right? How? You do not know Phil Spector. Chris/Homeland Security (who I spoke with) was able to tell me that he thought the District Attorney and/or Governor’s Office was behind much of what I was going through - that included the SWAT Team and Killer King incident where I was questioned about Phil Spector. That entire file is, as you well know, falsified. Chris was a very professional, highly intelligent, and thoughtful individual and I was very very relieved to note that Homeland Security has employees like this. He was truthful, matter of fact, and seemed to know what he was talking about. You, on the other hand, sound like a pathetic liar who is obsessed with me, the Phil Spector matter, and all over the Cohen tax fraud matter. I’ll quote you to Mr. Spector. As I’ve said I am printing out this Blog and its contents and mailing it to Phillip.
Kelley Lynch
Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
From November 25, 2009 at 3:52 am through this morning, November 26, 2009 at 10:17 am we have now received a cumulative 96 emails from Kelley Lynch. (The emails briefly stopped between 2:01 am and 7:22 am this morning.
These emails were also copied to the IRS, the Justice Department, agent Sopko, and others.
This is in addition to the scores of posts on this site during the same time period.
I would call that obsessed with Leonard Cohen.
Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Walsh, you haven’t sent me the emails that you allege I copied you in on this morning. I have, however, forwarded this morning’s public emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Agent Sopko, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan - with a note that I didn’t think you were copied in but it needs to be double-checked.
Well, let’s see, Walsh: I raised two children, ran two business, traveled on business, sponsored a Buddhist center for His Holiness Kusum Lingpa (for Oliver Stone), served on the Board of Director’s of two Boards - Orgyen Khachod Ling and Joshu Sasaki Roshi’s Rinzai Jr Board, did volunteer worked, oversaw the education of my children - including the teachers who taught my older son. I was careful to be certain to hire experts in their fields and he received a wonderful, broad, and classical education.
I am looking for work, monitoring the slander, etc., tending to my life, and writing a book. Is writing a book a “threat?” I don’t need to get started - my book is well underway. I don’t sit and Blog all day and can do several things at once actually. I like to do one thing at a time when it’s extremely important - such as trapping liars.
Kelley Lynch
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
What happend to the two or three other books you have been threatening to write in the past few months? You better get started if you have to write all these books and movies and sue all these people, how do you have time to sit and “blog” all day
November 26th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Correction: Oliver Stone and I sponsored Orgyen Khachod Ling for His Holiness Kusum Lingpa.
November 26th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Note: It wasn’t 3:52 AM in my time zone. I was sleeping.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
From November 25, 2009 at 3:52 am through this morning, November 26, 2009 at 10:17 am we have now received a cumulative 96 emails from Kelley Lynch. (The emails briefly stopped between 2:01 am and 7:22 am this morning.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
I used three phones in New Jersey - John Southard’s office phone; my cell phone on John Southard Jr’s account; and, John Southard, Jr’s cell phone.
Why would I call Cohen from New Jersey when I had already addressed his perjured Declaration and fraudulent matter meant to silence me in my Motion to Quash raising all the issues I felt needed to be raised on the record? Where would Gianelli-Blogonaut get this information from? He has said he hasn’t communicated with Robert Kory and/or Michelle Rice. I also did not “flee” to New Jersey and that is a pompous, intentional remark. John Southard, Sr. gave me money for a plane ticket. They gave me a house to live in and hired me. I left when I thought His Holiness Kusum Lingpa was dying and issues arose with respect to Ray - in a conversation that John Southard, Jr. witnessed. Why would I flee? I was also quite public about my whereabouts.
Just addressing every single lie and every single issue and allegation Gianelli-Blogonaut (and others) raise and have raised.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Moreover, if what you are saying was true, you would not have telephoned Cohen and left him voice messages when you initially fled to New Jersey after the September, 2008 civil harassment restraining order was issued.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
No matter–the point is that there was only a seven hour break between the emails–which spanned your entire waking hours.
Nor do you deny sending us 96 emails in that compressed time period.
That is not the behavior of a well person.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity
cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
Paul Burger ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:01 PM
subject Re: I Don’t Recall Phoning Cohen From New Jersey
P.S. I am convinced that the fraudulent restraining order matter opened statutes that some parties feel were closed. David Moorhead was convinced, after our discussion, that Robert Kory’s letters to him and Craig Blockwick (as well as Daniel Bergman’s threatening letter to Phil Shull that was sent to the FBI in Denver which caused Phil Shull to determine that I am the victim of “filthy lawyering) opened statutes as well. Gianelli-Blogonaut is clearly an idiot posing as a “lawyer.”
November 26th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Keep count of how many emails and posts it has taken me to address your lies, slander, fraud, defamation of character, and attempts to undermine my credibliity as a a potential witness and/or human being and Mother. Pay careful attention to the fact that I am documenting all of your activity and intend to litigate these matters. Assume I won’t. Underestimate me. That is your problem - not mine. You are not going to have an opportunity to state at a later date that the truth was not brought to your attention. It has been, repeatedly - time and time again, ad nauseum. You are willfully overlooking facts, the truth, and you - not I - are harassing and stalking me.
Stalking a stranger and lying about them publicly is truly abnormal behavior. Insulting Agent Sopko is shameless. Lying to the FBI is criminal. Contacting an investigator on Phil Spector’s matter is sinister. Communicating with Leonard Cohen’s advisers is also sinister. Targeting my son and attempting to intimidate him, my sister, and brother-in-law is outrageous and unconscionable. You are a pathelogical liar and I believe your motive is to derail or obstruct a potential federal criminal prosecution involving Leonard Cohen. Your emails/calls to Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko were, from my perspective, an attempt to determine what the IRS is doing.
I was told, by Agent Sopko, that one thing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is doing is reading my emails. Were I them - I would charge you, arrest you, and prosecute you. I am, however, not a U.S. prosecutor. I will, nevertheless, litigate the civil issues that have arisen from your outlandish and shameful conduct. Rest assured of that.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
No matter–the point is that there was only a seven hour break between the emails–which spanned your entire waking hours.
Nor do you deny sending us 96 emails in that compressed time period.
That is not the behavior of a well person.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
“Phillip is going to win on appeal and that’s why everyone is so focused on me and my public comments.”
Ms. Lynch, the only mind in which PS and KL’s legal fortuines are linked is yours.
We well understand why: Spector has money and a lawyer and you don’t. Naturally, you would like to “share” a lawsuit–because you broke bread with Spector how many times and how many years ago? Such “dear” friends that you did not attend on day of pretrial procedings or of either trial to show your support, even though you were not working at the time?
Some friend–which her hand out that is.
You also made an ass out of yourself (again) by insisting to Spector’s FORMER criminal lawyer and his current appellate lawyer that the notion that you and/or Cohen are not a part of Spector’s appeal is “absurd”.
But it is YOU that is absurd.
The appeal will be confined to the 4 courners of the trial transcript and will focus primarily on the so called 1101 evidence, and not your nonsense about witness tampering or perjury during the grand jury proceedings.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Do you have to think of the bullshit you spew or does it just come to you naturally? Oh, if there were only a pooper scooper law for the internet. Then we could scoop up the crap you spew, put it on the compost heap then spread it in the spring.
Kelley, the only thing the IRS, FBI, or any other agency will ever share with you is space on this earth—and perhaps they’re unhappy about sharing that much with you!
Phil Spector doesn’t care a wit what others think of you. Most likely, you’re just providing entertainment—comic relief. The IRS staff reads your emails for entertainment purposes only. No one has to undermine your credibility, Kelley. Congratulations, you’ve done that all by yourself.
Kelley, all your internet postings and emails indicate just one thing—your descent into utter madness and insanity. You foolishly, foolishly think your story will be a “Hollywood Blockbuster”. How much more embarrassment must you family endure? It’s unfortunate not one person cares about you enough or loves you enough to see to it you get professional help: but even family members have a breaking point.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Trust me Blogonaut-Gianelli - every word you utter matters because every word you have written about me is a lie and that includes your preposterous allegation to Agent Wynar/FBI that I am spamming Agent Sopko of the Treasury Department. As I said to Agent Wynar - this should have taken him three minutes to investigate and see through. In other words, you lied to the FBI, are no in position whatsoever to speak for Agent Sopko or the other federal agencies copied in on my emails, and that is criminal from what I can tell. But, you’re playing a game You are also in no position whatsoever to state publicly whether there is or is not a pending federal prosecution (relating to Leonard Cohen) or who the IRS and/or others will call as a witness. Furthermore, you have no authority - whatsoever - to speak for Phil Spector. I doubt Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan want you to speak on their behalf and I doubt they authorized that. As you’re a liar these men and agents will have to take the witness stand to testify to their version of events and can recount the conversations from their perspective. As I’ve stated, the FBI seems to record all conversations.
Kelley Lynch
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Jewel of Activity
cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
Paul Burger ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI
date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:12 PM
subject Re: I Don’t Recall Phoning Cohen From New Jersey
Agent Sopko,
This man is positively deranged from what I can tell - but he knows precisely what he is doing and he’s gleefully witness tampering, attempting to obstruct justice, attempting to derail a probable/possible federal prosecution (of Cohen), and obviously stalking me and attempting to monitor my actions and whereabouts. The manaic has publicly stated that I’m in Mexico. You are well aware of where I am and who I am spending Thanksgiving with. Trust me - he emailed you and called Agent Wynar because he wants to know what’s going on with the IRS. That does not explain his contacts with Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, or Investigator Frayeh - now does it?
All the best,
Kelley
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the FBI and DOJ,
The man who lied to Agent Wynar and is quoting him publicly is truly unstable - from what I can tell. He is a shameless, arrogant liar and does not know when to quit. I am concerned about his obsession and fixation with and on me, my children, my sister, and her husband. It is absolutely not normal conduct. The man does not know me.
All the best,
Kelley
November 26th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
You continue to drag as many people as you possibly can into your litigations issues: you childre, parent, sister; Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Ron Burkle, Mick Brown, David Moorhead, Ronald Mitchell, to name but just a few.
“Oliver Stone is a friend of mine” Just how do you define the word friend, Kelley? Are your “friends” those to whom you’ve just waved at, those who exist in your fantasy land, imaginary friends, or are your friends those whom would die for you? Common sense would indicates most of your “friends” are, at best, fleeting acquaintances. Most likely, those to whom you refer to as “friends” have no idea who you are other than the psycho who stalks and spams them.
And just who is David Moorhead. Good lord, Kelley, do you just throw names out there in hopes that others will be impressed? Junior Gotti ring a bell? If Moorhead was an important witness, why didn’t he testify at Spector’s trials?
Who is Ronald Mitchell and why are you accusing him of murder? Did Mitchell try to help you at one time? Did you then turn on Mitchell and accuse him of murder? A sane person would have figured out that by now the BPD has completed and investigation into your fantasy murder allegations. Has Mitchell been arrested for murder? If Mitchell has not been arrested for murder, then stop with your slanderous and libelous allegations. Why is it necessary for your continuous and unrelenting character assassinations?
November 26th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
November 26th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Now, Kelley, this is truly amazing: “I’m not interested in Leonard Cohen and he can drop dead (literally) for all I care.” In light of your statement/pronouncement and if you’re truly not interested in Cohen and you don’t care about Cohen, then why do continue to stalk, harass, and threaten him?
Wait just a minute. When I questioned your memory of the transport to “Killer King”, you corrected me and informed the blog world that you told the cops nothing. Are you now saying you did answer their questions? Wow, what a difference a day makes. And quit dragging Mick Brown into this. Either Cohen testified before the grand jury or he didn’t—just provide us with proof that he did or didn’t. If Mick Brown sent you emails regarding Cohen’s did he or didn’t he testify, you would have posted them by now. Leave Mick Brown out of this.
Are you still asking us to believe Cohen offered you 50/50 community property? Try to remember, Kelley, with the exception of Cohen’s ability to perform, you stole every asset he had. Cohen had nothing to split with you. I suppose it’s possible, just possible, Cohen was hoping you would return 50% of what you stole from him.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
I see you’re behaving in your usual crass and aggressive matter, Green. You actually seem more masculine than feminine but who knows for certain. What interest do you have in laws? You are slandering me and lying about me and you do not know me, have no facts - whatsoever (unless you’re Cohen or his advisers), and have not reviewed the evidence I’ve provided the IRS. Clearly you could care less about slander, defamation, libel, fraudulent allegations, and threats. There are laws that address these issues and I will be using those laws.
Agent Sopko/Treasury Department shared this with me: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is receiving my emails and letters and reading them. In fact, she informed me (or her partner did) that quite a number of people at the IRS are reading them. In any event, how would you know what the IRS, FBI, or any other agency will or won’t do?
You’re speaking for Phil Spector now. I don’t think you are authorized to speak for Phil Spector and I think you are a liar. What kind of comic relief does Phil Spector have while in prison? Do you want to explain that to me? This is a crass, vile, and malicious game and I am convinced that you personally have “motive.”
The IRS Commissioner’s Staff reads my emails for entertainment purposes only. I will quote you to them. In fact, I will share your post with them. Why would the IRS engage in frivolous conduct. That is not a logical, reasonable, or sound conclusion to draw. A logical, reasonable, rational, and sound conclusion to draw is that they took my allegations of Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal (and supported with tremendous evidence and recollections of what had gone one) seriously. Another logical, reasonable, rational, and sound conclusion is that there will be a federal prosecution. In fact, Ed Dean - Cohen’s own lawyer - felt that the IRS (from what I could tell) should go in after certain advisers as well. Dale Burgess, my former accountant and a former IRS agent, was convinced that Criminal Intelligence/IRS should be involved here. He is a witness and has examined a tremendous amount of evidence relative to Cohen’s Tax Fraud Matter. He witnessed Kory’s offer (on behalf of Cohen - to me) of 50% community property, $10,000/month walking around money, etc. and asked me to advise the IRS and Treasury that he would take the stand and testify to this.
Kelley, all your internet postings and emails indicate just one thing—your descent into utter madness and insanity. You foolishly, foolishly think your story will be a “Hollywood Blockbuster”. How much more embarrassment must you family endure? It’s unfortunate not one person cares about you enough or loves you enough to see to it you get professional help: but even family members have a breaking point.
If no one has to attempt to undermine my credibility - what are you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh, and others doing on this Blog? You are clearly lying and can never prevail in a court of law.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?
While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!
November 26th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
Correction, make that 98 emails we received in the last 48 hours–including the last email from KL to the Comissioner of the IRS, agent Sokpo, Alan Jackson, former Spector attorey Weinberg, the Department of Justice–bringing the “important” news that Kelley Lynch disagrees with Kelley Green on Phawker!
November 26th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
Oppps–we just deleted 20 emails…..
November 26th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, I have said nothing whatsoever about “legal fortunes.” It’s a bizarre concept to me given the circumstances.
How do you know if I have an attorney or not? You don’t know me. I don’t recall ever breaking bread with Mr. Spector. How would you know? You weren’t there, do not know me, and do not know Phil Spector. Why would I attend what I viewed as a set up? If Phil Spector wanted me there he would have contacted me and I would have been there. I have shown my support for Mr. Spector in other ways and you saw Bill Pavelic’s email to me about my efforts on Mr. Spector’s behalf. Bill Pavelic was Phil Spector’s investigator. You only quote Bill Pavelic and others when it is convenient and in an attempt to support your lies and slander. It’s none of your business who I hire as an attorney or how I pay for an attorney but I know you’re dying to find out.
Actually, Gianelli-Blogonaut, I didn’t say it was “absurd” if I wasn’t part of an appeal. I’m not an appellate lawyer but Dennis Riordan, who was copied in on that email, is Phil Spector’s appellate lawyer. I believe Phil Spector and I have serious legal issues that will, in time, be raised in a court of law - possibly more than one. I have no idea if they will be raised on appeal. That’s Phil Spector and his lawyer’s business.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
“Phillip is going to win on appeal and that’s why everyone is so focused on me and my public comments.”
Ms. Lynch, the only mind in which PS and KL’s legal fortuines are linked is yours.
We well understand why: Spector has money and a lawyer and you don’t. Naturally, you would like to “share” a lawsuit–because you broke bread with Spector how many times and how many years ago? Such “dear” friends that you did not attend on day of pretrial procedings or of either trial to show your support, even though you were not working at the time?
I have no interest in your views on Phil Spector’s appeal on any legal issue. I think you’re a liar who has committed federal crimes and no one on earth is going to convince me otherwise. I believe you are intentionally witness tampering and attempting to derail and/or obstruct a possibly pending federal matter relating to Leonard Cohen. I am convinced you lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and I am convinced that you attempted to determine what was going on with Cohen’s tax matter (and the IRS) when you emailed Agent Sopko and contacted Agent Wynar. That does not explain your communications with Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and/or Leonard Cohen’s advisers.
Kelley Lynch
Some friend–which her hand out that is.
You also made an ass out of yourself (again) by insisting to Spector’s FORMER criminal lawyer and his current appellate lawyer that the notion that you and/or Cohen are not a part of Spector’s appeal is “absurd”.
But it is YOU that is absurd.
The appeal will be confined to the 4 courners of the trial transcript and will focus primarily on the so called 1101 evidence, and not your nonsense about witness tampering or perjury during the grand jury proceedings.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
I tend to doubt that.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
Oppps–we just deleted 20 emails…..
November 26th, 2009 at 6:49 pm
“If no one has to attempt to undermine my credibility - what are you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh, and others doing on this Blog?”
We are entertaining ourselves by trying to pin you down logically.
Nor are we “lying” about the opinions expressed here.
Nor do we need to “undermine” your credibility–anyone who sends 10 emails a day to the IRS, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and others–including on the subject of who they disagree with on various blogs–has no credibility.
Everything you have done on-line for years says “nut job”.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
You couldn’t pin me down logically, Gianelli-Blogonaut. You are an arrogant moron. I didn’t say you’re lying about opinions. I said you are lying about me and have targeted my son, sister, and her husband. Reead my posts and emails.
I can assure you that I’m not emailing the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Agent Sopko about people who annoy me or disagree wth me. I am emailng them because I believe this is an organized campaign of harassment and cyber-terrorism meant to silence me and undermine my credibility. I personally believe it is who is the laughing stock but happen to remain convinced that you are attempting to derail or obstruct a potential federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen. You are in no postion to say - one way or another - what is pending with the IRS but you have read my emails to them documenting what has gone on since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.
Care to explain why you lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and called the FBI about spamming the Treasury when you had Agent Sopko’s email address and contacted her directly? For the record, Agent Sopko has not advised me that I am “spamming” her. I do not know what authority you have to speak on her behalf and/or on behalf of the Treasury.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:49 pm
“If no one has to attempt to undermine my credibility - what are you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh, and others doing on this Blog?”
We are entertaining ourselves by trying to pin you down logically.
Nor are we “lying” about the opinions expressed here.
Nor do we need to “undermine” your credibility–anyone who sends 10 emails a day to the IRS, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and others–including on the subject of who they disagree with on various blogs–has no credibility.
Everything you have done on-line for years says “nut job”.
November 26th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
P.S> If verything I’ve done on line for years says “nut job” - why areyou obsessed with me?
November 26th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
One can credibly argue (as we have) that Phillip Spector did not receive a fair trial. One can even credibly argue that Spector is innocent (although clearly the weight of public opinion is clearly to the contrary, and the first argument is likely to be more successful right now that the former one).
But one cannot credibly argue that Phil Spector was “set up”—let alone for reasons relating to Leonard Cohen or Kelley Lynch. That (among many reasons) is why you have no credibility.
As to why we care?
a. You will not leave us alone b. we are facinated and horrified.
November 26th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
View it as a threat. That’s fine with me. I have every intention of relying on the justice system. Since you don’t know me and are not authorized to speak on my behalf you cannot say otherwise.
I see right through you and your ongoing not-so-veiled threats.
Leonard Cohen dragged Oliver Stone into this situation. Make no mistakes about it. Steven Segal is witness to a critical situation that I discussed with the Treasury Agents - as is Agent Bill Betzer. Ron Burkle authorized me to copy him in on my emails. Mr. Burkle is brilliant and has a legal team. I think he knows how to address matters. You obviously do not speak for Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, or Ron Burkle - do you? Mick Brown contacted me and we emailed extensively. He wrote me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector in the grand jury. Mick Brown is a journalist and our communications were not and are not “privileged” or confidetial. Ronald Mitchell inserted himeslf into this matter. His employee, who wtnessed certain things with Mitchell, felt his motive was liability. I think he’s in over his head but we shall see. You forot Dr. Dre and Mike Elizondo - who were dragged into this by Lindsey and Cohen. And, of course, Cloris Leachman who was at the bottom of the hill with my son Ray while Lindsey was witnessed lying to police officers on May 25, 2005. Since I was questioned about Phil Spector en route to King Drew immediately thereafter one can safely assume this is a deadly serious legal matter - particularly as the entire file is falsified. And, of course, while that was taking place Rutger was asked - by Lindsey - to go in and sign over my house to Cohen and/or Kory. Neal Greenberg raised, in his lawsuit against Cohen, this issue: that Cohen, Linsey, Kory, and Superfon “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. Obviously the situation is heavy and was dangerous.
Figure out who David Moorhead is on your own. I don’t work for you. I am merely documenting your lies, slander, and attacks on my character. The same goes for Ronald Mitchell. Investigate this yourself. Actually, as a number of residents and employees know, John/Jeff alleged that he murdered a 15 year old. A police oficer I volunteered with at the Birds of Prey felt this had to be reported. Why would Mitchell be arrested for murder? He’s not the one who was going aroun saying he murdered someone. John/Jeff, as people witnessed, attempted to assault me and another young woman and was unstable, cheering on “Hitler” in the community rooms, and a real creep. John/Jeff should have thought about his “character” when he told so many people that he murdered a 15-year old. One person was concerned that John/Jeff nearly snapped in their presence. Boulder PD knows he crowd that frequents the Boulder Hostel or should They have a station next door and were there frequently enough.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
You continue to drag as many people as you possibly can into your litigations issues: you childre, parent, sister; Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Ron Burkle, Mick Brown, David Moorhead, Ronald Mitchell, to name but just a few.
“Oliver Stone is a friend of mine” Just how do you define the word friend, Kelley? Are your “friends” those to whom you’ve just waved at, those who exist in your fantasy land, imaginary friends, or are your friends those whom would die for you? Common sense would indicates most of your “friends” are, at best, fleeting acquaintances. Most likely, those to whom you refer to as “friends” have no idea who you are other than the psycho who stalks and spams them.
And just who is David Moorhead. Good lord, Kelley, do you just throw names out there in hopes that others will be impressed? Junior Gotti ring a bell? If Moorhead was an important witness, why didn’t he testify at Spector’s trials?
Who is Ronald Mitchell and why are you accusing him of murder? Did Mitchell try to help you at one time? Did you then turn on Mitchell and accuse him of murder? A sane person would have figured out that by now the BPD has completed and investigation into your fantasy murder allegations. Has Mitchell been arrested for murder? If Mitchell has not been arrested for murder, then stop with your slanderous and libelous allegations. Why is it necessary for your continuous and unrelenting character assassinations?
November 26th, 2009 at 7:23 pm
How’s Thanksgiving with your friends, Gianelli-Blogonaut? I am completely uninterested in your opinions on Phil Spector’s legal isues. He has been represented by some of the greatest attorneys in this contry - as well as major forensic scientists (who wrote the textbooks in these fields) who concluded that Clarkson shot herself. Fortunately, public opinion does not arise with the Appellate Court but it did help to have so much gossip on the stand about Phillip - and on the internet.
I think Phil Spector was set up. Many people feel the same way. I could care less what you think. And it appears to be dead obvious. Take a look at Paul Huebl’s Blog.
No one is forcing you to come onto this Blog, read, and post- and no one is forcing you to lie, slander me, and/or attempt to undermine my credibility.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
One can credibly argue (as we have) that Phillip Spector did not receive a fair trial. One can even credibly argue that Spector is innocent (although clearly the weight of public opinion is clearly to the contrary, and the first argument is likely to be more successful right now that the former one).
But one cannot credibly argue that Phil Spector was “set up”—let alone for reasons relating to Leonard Cohen or Kelley Lynch. That (among many reasons) is why you have no credibility.
As to why we care?
a. You will not leave us alone b. we are facinated and horrified.
November 26th, 2009 at 7:23 pm
P.S. Fascinated and horrified probably sums things up with you. Obsessed also works.
November 26th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
What order have I given “Alan Jackson” - the man Bruce Cutler called girlie and the man I view as a big phoney, tattle tale, and someone who should be investigated - by the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Immigration, DEA, Phillip’s legal team and possibly ohers.
For the record, destruction of evidence is criminal. Jackson knows this.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?
While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!
November 26th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, remove Rutger and my sister and her husband from your emails. Your attempts to intimdate them and threaten them have failed but you are transparent.
Kelley Lynch
November 26th, 2009 at 7:35 pm
— On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Remove Rutger From Your Emails Gianelli-Blogonaut - Alan Jackson Doesn’t Have To Save Evidence … Wouldn’t That Be Criminal?
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “STEPHEN GIANELLI”
Cc: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, mpduke1@msn.com
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:34 PM
P.S. Rutger has asked him to stop contacting him and to stop threatening him. Gianelli lied about the handbag and has lied non-stop about me. Rutger is aware that I am documenting the lies and slander. It is exhausting but I intend to litigate these issues.
— On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Remove Rutger From Your Emails Gianelli-Blogonaut - Alan Jackson Doesn’t Have To Save Evidence … Wouldn’t That Be Criminal?
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “STEPHEN GIANELLI”
Cc: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, mpduke1@msn.com
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:32 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Gianelli, from my perspective, is attempting to intimidate Rutger. Kelly Green is now addressing Alan Jackson and possible destruction of evidence.
All the best,
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
What order have I given “Alan Jackson” - the man Bruce Cutler called girlie and the man I view as a big phoney, tattle tale, and someone who should be investigated - by the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Immigration, DEA, Phillip’s legal team and possibly ohers.
For the record, destruction of evidence is criminal. Jackson knows this.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?
While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!
— On Thu, 11/26/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 5:00 PM
You wrote at 7:22 am to say: “I am now removing you from these emails”, but three minutes later you email me again! Do you have any idea how many emails you have sent to this account in the last 30 hours? More than 60!
Do you know how many times you have written to deny that you ever owned a Birkin bag? Half a dozen.
Give it a rest, Ms. Lynch. This is civil harassment plain and simple.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Just want you to be clear that I never owned a Birkin bag. My financial information, past or present, is none of your business.
Kelley Lynch
——————————————————————————–
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
To: Kelley Lynch
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 2:21:32 PM
Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
Ok, then what did youn pay for you Birken bag adn what do you claim your NM high balance was?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the Department of Justice and FBI,
Someone was apparently monitoring me in Santa Monica. I don’t think I was accessorized however. According to this nut, Birkin bags are never priced under $30,000 and never go on sale. I just googled them and there are three, listed below, under $30,000.
You don’t think he’s attempting to witness tamper, do you?
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Uh, Ms: Lynch: there are purchase records and other proof involved.
Let’s just say that 1. Your Neiman Marcus account records speak for iteself and 2. You were the best accessorized person to habitually sleep on the beach in Santa Monica following the eviction from your luxury home.
Nor (we note) do you deny owing a Birkin bag, nor is there any such thing as a Birkin bag priced under $30,000. (They never go on sale, and there is a long waiting list.)
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, there are purchase records and I can assure you that my credit card records are none of your business or anyone else’s for that matter. There is, however, no proof that I bought a $30,000 Birkin bag because I did not.
Let’s say that you can never subpoena my Neiman Marcus records because you don’t know me and are now, an absolute stranger, interested in my credit card records. Ok. How would you konw how I looked in Santa Monica or how I accessorized myself? I know Peter/Jacob Falconey - who impersonated a federal agent - was stalking me there and reported one incident to Santa Monica PD. The field report of that incident exists.
I absolutely deny ever owning a Birkin bag. I just googled Birkin bag and immediately turned up three under $30,000.
Kelley Lynch
Hermes Birkin bag
$2,750.00 new - eCRATER - vivelarose
Parchemin Clemence & Gold 35cm Hermes Birkin Bag
$15,403.70 new - eCRATER …
Hermes Tan Gold 35CM Birkin Bag Togo Leather
$1,350.00 new - Sacs En Ligne
How To Buy A Birkin Bag
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:52:52 PM
Subject: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, you’ve lied about the Birkin bag. I never owned one and never would actually. I preferred more reasonable designers - such as Michael Kors. You must have this story confused with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg she spent $30,000 at Neiman’s. My house was modest and my lifestyle was modest.
I haven’t “reported” you to Agent Sopko. I’ve asked her to confirm and validate your comments about what she told you. I have already asked the IRS, DOJ, Tresaury, and FBI to investigate whether or not you are attempting to obstruct justice, sabatage an IRS criminal prosecution (that may be pending), witness tampering, etc. Whether they do is up to them.
I know you think this is fun and exciting - inserting yourself into a deadly serious tax matter and Phil Spector’s set up; insulting federal agents; lying to the FBI; contacting Investigator Frayeh; etc. Your emails and posts of yesterday are evidence that you are arrogant, harassing me, and out of your mind from what I can tell.
I cannot threaten criminal prosecution. I am not a criminal prosecutor or attorney as I’ve repeatedly stated. The “feds” should know, better than I, what is and/or is not a crime. I do not, however, refer to the parties copied in as “the feds” because I am not crass and I am not playing deadly games with them. You are not my victim. You had Joff Belark target me and he wrote one long lie that you posted as an article. No one forced you to descend onto this Blog and lie about me publicly, slander me, threaten my son, and raise fraudulent allegations. You yourself came to this Blog and, from my perspective, your sole motive is to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent goverment witness” and to sabatage any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others. That’s my opinion. I have no idea how the “United States” investigates, arrests, and prosecutes anyone. I asked the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury to investigate you. Whether or not they arrest and prosecute you, Cohen, and others remains to be seen.
Kelley Lynch
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:45:56 PM
Subject: Gianelli The Arrogant Weighs In Again
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
OOOOH–You have reported us for the sixth hundredth time[?] to Agent Sopko.
We are shaking in our boots, ooooooh!
Ps: Kelley Lynch: You serially threaten criminal prosecution by posting and CCing your victims with threats to report their alleged “cimes” to the “feds” (aa you like o put it), and by posting and copying your victims with emails to Agent Sopko (and many other law enforcers) askiing that your victims be “investigated”. “arrested”, and “prosecued” by the United States.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:43:48 PM
Subject: Re: Ron’s House In La Jolla Is Drop Dead Gorgeous Also
P.S. I heard Lindsey’s living nicely in Cold Water Canyon. Not sure where he gets his money. He always borrowed money from me and never repaid it or child support. He did not support his child. He drove a Lexus or Jaguar. I kept my Landcruiser for 10 years until it was fully paid off. Lindsey took it and was going to pay me $14,000 for it. I guess he stole it. I just mentioned to Rutger the other night (who is suffering financially) that Lindsey has my juke box. He stole that also. His gambling habit didn’t help.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:42:16 PM
Subject: Ron’s House In La Jolla Is Drop Dead Gorgeous Also
Hi Thinley Norbu Rinpoche,
You should see Ron’s house in La Jolla. It’s drop dead gorgeous. Having said that - Ron lives a relatively modest life from what I noticed. I was frequently at his house. His former secret service agent, Frank, didn’t appear to view me as a threat.
Love,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:40:59 PM
Subject: Blogonaut - Ron Burkle Has A $30 Million Dollar House And Great Cars
Hi Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Ron Burkle has an amazing and historic house. He knows the property values in the Los Angeles area. And, his son spent countless hours with me and at my modest home.
You are and always will be a liar who has targeted me. Alan Jackson deserves you and Michelle Blaine.
Kelley Lynch
——————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:37:15 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
P.S. Lindsey did give me a $1,000 Louis Vuitton backpack that I used for approximately 10 years. And the travel case that I pawned after Cohen and Lindsey destroyed my life because I had the nerve to report Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Patrick at the Santa Monica pawn shop, who noted that Starving Stupids destroyed everything in storage, will recall this. He should also remember that I gave him a Phil Spector jacket which he loved.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:35:36 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
Hi Agent Sopko,
I think Birkin bags are tacky. I preferred other less expensive designers. More reasonable bags - maybe $200 or so. I didn’t even own a piece of jewelry worth $30,000 so these people are out of their minds.
All the best,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:34:43 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
P.S. I hate Birkin bags. They make me think of the billoinare twins who Rutger went to camp with.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:33:54 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Please review my tax returns. You will note that I withdrew money from my retirement account and paid for my house. I bought my parents condominium with a commissoin I received. I did not do volunteer work for Cohen but felt I was really his slave.
All the best,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:32:35 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Gianelli-Blogonaut and the liars are never going to prove that I owned a $30,000 Birkin bag or a $1,000 Birkin bag for that matter. They must have me confused with Paris Hilton or Anjani Thomas. I suppose Gianelli-Blogonaut is confusing this with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg that she spent $30,000 at Neiman Marcus. She thought that’s where this garbage gossip arose from.
My house was modest and guess who is a witness to that fact? Phil Spector. Phillip, however, happened to like my house very very much although it certainly wasn’t as large and/or as glamorous and my neighbors - Susan Lord and Steven Segal. I closed my retirement account, paid the taxes on my IRA withdrawal, and put a downpayment on a very nice, very simple house that was Rutger, Ray and my home.
Are they attempting to turn me into a Hollywood starlett type? I didn’t even go out and no one will ever be able to prove that I did - except for lunches with Cohen or my Mother; shopping or the doctor’s office with the children; carpooling; volunteer work; and - of course - the House of Blues and the restaurant with Harry Dean Stanton with Phillip. I also attended some Grammy parties - on official business because I do not like large events and am not particularly social. His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, Yongzin Rinpoche, Choegon Rinpoche, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, Lingtrul Rinpoche, Chagdud Rinpoche, and many other lamas would frequently visit me and oftentimes stay with me - for months at a time. Yongzin Rinpoche actually lived in my small guest house for a while. And, of course, Gesar Mukpo (my nephew through marriage to Douglas Penick - who was married to Trungpa Rinpoche’s sister-in-law regardless of what Bergman was attempting to prove in Court - that Gesar’s not my nephew) lived with me on Keniston Avenue and Mandeville Canyon.
I’m clear about Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive, are you?
Love,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:25:48 PM
Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Blogonaut-Gianelli is interested in my Neiman’s account. Why? Am I married to this deranged madman? I never owned a Hermes Birkin bag and I have never in my life paid anything like that for a handbag. It is an absurd and preposterous allegation and it is a lie. Of course, as usual, Gianelli-Blogonaut will never be able to prove that lie. In any event, the burden of proof is now on Gianelli-Blogonaut. This will be an impossible feat for this liar to prove.
Actually, the Governor lived on Mandeville Canyon Road and the homes are often priced between $25-30 million. I bought my house for approximately $700,000 which was a steal. My Father and I almost single-handledly renovated the house. It was worth $1.8 million when I lost it due to various unfortunate circumstances - including the fact that the potential buyer wanted to give me $200,000 in cash (and an apartment) under the table and did not want to have a written agreement. I did not trust that type of deal although I was assured by him and Wendi Knaak that it was a valid deal. I believe I said my lifestyle was modest. My home was modest. The property values are high.
Gianelli-Blogonaut, as always, does not pay attention to details.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
“I didn’t live a high lifestyle.”
Excuse us, Ms. Lynch, it must have been someone else with the $70,000 balance on their Neiman Marcus account and who owned (among other luxuries) a $30,000 Hermès Birkin bag.
And it must have been someone else who posted above as Kelley Lynch to admit to living in a $1.8 MILLION home with a pool in an exclusive Los Angeles neighborhood.
For give us, but that fact that you believe that a $1.8 million home is not that extravagant PROVES that you were indeed living la dolce vita.
You see, Ms. Lynch we do pay attention to “details”—and we remember them too.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:20:18 PM
Subject: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution - He’s A Liar
Agent Sopko,
I want you to read Blogonaut-Gianelli’s public post from Phawker.com (and below). You told Gianelli-Blogonaut thta “a reasonable person would not find” me “credible” so “Blogonaut-Gianelli” should “not be too concerned about” my posts. Right, Agent Sopko? This is, no doubt, verbatim. The Treasury, according to Gianelli-Blogonaut, told him in so many words (which I would like him to repeat verbatim in quotes), that the Treasury does ont believe he is attempting to obstruct justice or witness tampering? Would you mind confirming that for me. There is nothing on Phawker’s Blog or in Gianelli-Blogonaut’s action that can be construed as “common sense.” I did not initiate a “chat room.” I responded to an article Phawker posted about Cohen where I believed I was slandered. Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh (all affiliated with Blogonaut’s garbage site) and others descended and targeted me and have lied and slandered me. I suppose you support that also, correct? I haven’t said that what Gianelli-Blogonaut is now defining as a “federal crime” is a federal crime. He is twisting the words - clearly documented on this Blog - and putting words in my mouth. I have no idea what his stupid remark about giving testimony in a paternity matter has to do with anything.
Perhaps you would also like to explain, for me, how I could threaten criminal prosecution. Do you see me working for the IRS, DOJ, FBI and/or Treasury as a prosecutor? Am I a attorney? Then how could I threaten criminal prosecution? I have reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud and absolutely believe Gianelli-Blogonaut is willfully witness tampering, threatening my son, monitoring my actions, stalking, participating in cyber-terrorism, retaliating against witnesses, raising false allegations about me, accusing me and Rutger of things we have not done, etc.
I have never frivolously requested an investigation into anyone who annoys me. I think Susanne Walsh is a complete lunatic and malicious woman but am convinced that she is merely a Cohen cult victim and her opinions do not interest me. Her vicious comments about Rutger prove, to me, that I am dealing with people who behave unconscionable and are capable of anything. I, do, however, think Kelly Green, Another Kelly Lynch Victim, and others on Phawker’s Blog should be investigated. Not because they annoy me. Because I believe they have motive to undermine a potential “prominent government witness” and sabatage a pending IRS criminal prosecution. I am assuming, based on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s remarks, that the Treasury is now attempting to undermine any potential IRS matter - as is Agent Wynar/FBI who seems to have told Gianelli-Blogonaut that I am a 5150 candidate and will have to testify to that on the stand and back it up with facts which isn’t going to happen.
Kelley Lynch
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:08:44 PM
Subject:
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
“It’s very obvious and very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Treasury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper?”
In so many words, yes.
But it is also a matter of common sense that joining in an internet chat board discussion initiated by the alleged “victim” and posting opinions that her alleged civil lawsuits are not viable and the poster is not credible is not a federal crime, let alone “witness tampering”. (Nor, BTW, is giving testimony in a paternity, or any other, matter.)
Agent Sopko also told us that a reasonable person would not find you credible so we would not be too concerned about your disparaging blog posts and your threats of criminal prosecution.
We say “your” agent Sopko because she is the person at the Department of the Treasury that you write daily (sometimes 10 times daily) to demand the prosecution of just about everyone who annoys you on the internet.
November 26th, 2009 at 7:38 pm
— On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI”
Cc: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, mpduke1@msn.com
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:36 PM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
The situation with Gianelli-Blogonaut attempting to threaten and/or intimidate Rutger is outlandish and outrageous.
Love,
Kelley
cc: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko - Treasury: the man is dangerously obsessed now.
November 26th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
Make no mistakes about this, Green - the justice system was set up to frame innocent people. You are harassing me and I see right through you.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
November 26th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
— On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Rutger -These People Are Now Desperate. Stay Wide Awake About Their Motives
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:58 PM
Rutger,
I am convinced this is criminal harassment. And much much more.
Love,
Mother
— On Thu, 11/26/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 5:00 PM
You wrote at 7:22 am to say: “I am now removing you from these emails”, but three minutes later you email me again! Do you have any idea how many emails you have sent to this account in the last 30 hours? More than 60!
Do you know how many times you have written to deny that you ever owned a Birkin bag? Half a dozen.
Give it a rest, Ms. Lynch. This is civil harassment plain and simple.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:40 pm
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Phil Spector Was Railroaded In A Legal Outrage
Los Angeles, CA—Judge Larry Paul Fiddler seemed like such a personable fellow when I met him in San Francisco at a function hosted by the Investigative Reporters and Editors some six years ago. First impressions are sometimes misleading.
Fidler had the duty to give murder suspects a fair trial under our sacred system of justice. When legendary record producer Phil Spector’s murder case came before Judge Fidler, fairness was replaced by judicial tyranny.
Fidler consistently ruled for nearly every request by prosecutors while denying nearly everything for Spector’s defense. Fidler was more biased than any judge I’ve seen in some 40 years.
Fidler was out to prove that a celebrity could get convicted after a stunning series of acquittals of other accused Hollywood notables.
Fidler was asked repeatedly to recuse himself and when he refused the defense went as far as the Court of Appeals and lost the argument.
The real abuse of judicial discretion was surrounding the newly revised California’s evidence code 1101B that could allow the introduction of so-called prior bad acts committed by the defendant.
Fidler allowed a string of women jilted by Spector to come into court and accuse Spector of whatever they wanted. Allegations surfaced that were never reported to police and there was never a prosecution or trial to sort out fact from fiction. The tales were decades old and the women telling them were felons, freeloaders and even sold their stories to the tabloids.
As for the evidence or rather a lack of it, the jury was allowed to be tainted by a very public hate campaign often centering on the aging Spector or his appearance.
The case was far more about salacious gossip than facts. The pretty dead woman, Lana Clarkson was painted as saintly or angelic. The truth was that she was a troubled alcohol and drug addicted woman who stole from her friends and lived under a cloud of poverty and depression.
The prosecutors took steps to cover up Clarkson’s real problems by asking the Los Angeles County Medical Examiners to not conduct the normal psychological autopsy done in such cases. This obstruction of justice was criminal to say the least.
The prosecution made a, Motion to Fix and Judge Filer sustained that motion. The jury was swayed by the avalanche of what should have been inadmissible garbage rather than evidence. The result was a miscarriage of justice.
Lana Clarkson died at her own hands while heavily intoxicated.
Now Phil Spector can watch the Clarkson family loot his estate as he rots in a prison cell for a year or few until his case is reviewed by a higher court.
Posted by Crimefile at 5/31/2009 09:12:00 AM
Labels: Crime Courts-justice, Spector
November 26th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Spector Verdict Is An Injustice
Los Angeles, CA—Legendary record producer Phil Spector should have never been arrested. Spector was arrested, tried and put through two trials that were unfair and un-American.
The most outrageous departure from fairness was the introduction of evidence of some failed relationships spanning 30 years. Recently in California lazy prosecutors created a voter proposition that would allow them to bring up uncharged or proven past allegations. I say lazy because this made convicting people including innocents a lot easier.
In Spector’s case the allegations were actually outside that proposition that became law. Most states would never allow that kind of gossip to taint a defendant’s trial.
The accusations against Spector should have stood or fallen on the scientific evidence alone. The jury was heavily influenced by gossip and hate rather than evidence.
The jury in this high-profile case should have been sequestered because of the media interest and thousands of pages of material posted on the internet most of which is inaccurate or worse. Jurors cannot be trusted to discontinue their Internet use while assigned to their duties. A Google search of Phil Spector and murder provided these results: “Results 1 - 50 of about 431,000 for Phil Spector Murder. (0.34 seconds)”
Judge Larry Paul Fidler took the prosecution’s side from the very beginning of the case, ruling for them on nearly every point raised during the pendency of the case.
This kind of injustice rarely gets anyone’s attention until they or a loved one is suddenly on trial.
I’m confident that Phil Spector’s conviction and sentence will be overturned. I’m not so confident that Phil Spector will survive long enough for the legal reviews of these serious issues.
In the mean time we can count on Lana Clarkson’s mother to use this conviction to her advantage in a civil court to loot Phil Spector’s sizable estate.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Thursday, April 09, 2009
Spector Jury on another misconduct opportunity Holiday!
Los Angeles, CA—The jury in the retrial of music legend Phil Spector must need more time to catch up on their Internet surfing of Spector related websites. This time it’s a woman juror who reportedly complained of illness and the jury was sent home.
Reportedly the ill juror will call in the morning and provide an update on her condition. Depending on the report the jury may return to deliberate only for a half day because of Good Friday.
In any event the jury deliberations will continue on Monday. I know they found the Clarkson family hate blogger’s site, now perhaps they can find mine, for another point of view.
Update: As of 8:35 AM Friday, the ill juror is on the mend and deliberations will resume at least for a half-day.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Thursday, April 02, 2009
The Phil Spector Jury Gets More Time To Engage In Misconduct
Los Angeles, CA–The Phil Spector murder trial jury returned to a four-day holiday only to deliberate a half day yesterday and they have been released by Judge Larry Paul Fidler until Monday. One juror claims to be ill and instead of replacing him with an alternate juror they have been sent home.
Will those jurors be able to stay away from the Internet? Will they be able to avoid the loads of published material that has been ruled off limits for the trial? I say there is no chance in Hell that will be the case.
Judge Fidler is doing all he can to taint this jury into convicting Phil Spector. Letting this jury to avoid timely deliberations can only work against Phil Spector and his right to a fair trial.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Lana Clarkson’s Life and Death OnThe Boulevard Of Broken Dreams
Venice, CA—In a tiny cottage here lived Lana Clarkson. She was a great looking glamorous lady. She sought work as an actress/entertainer with limited success. In Hollywood you either have an agent or you are unemployed. Agents are difficult to obtain even for very talented people. Clarkson needed an agent.
Lana Clarkson was not particularly talented but talent is not a requirement to make it in this town if you have the looks. There is no formula, but getting famous before your famous helps a lot. Hollywood was the birthplace of the publicity stunt. The trick is to pull one off without getting arrested. Actress and comedienne, Carol Channing was always a champ of the PR stunts.
Lana Clarkson had one B-movie, starring role and little to brag about or more importantly, pay the rent. I know many like Lana here in L.A. that are emotionally hurting while waiting to fulfill a dream.
Hollywood is unforgiving about age. For women it is doubly true. Clarkson turned 40, a milestone of old age for any actress. For an actress that has not achieved the desired career it is devastating.
Clarkson had another problem that destroyed her hope and that was a horrible fall that fractured both of her wrists crippling her for months in the recent time frame before her tragic death.
Lana became dependent upon pain killers for her emotional pain as well as the physical pain. Alcohol was also a big problem but still Clarkson tried to cope in an untenable situation.
Clarkson was forced to take a minimum wage job serving the people that she hoped were her peers. The earnings for that job were insufficient to pay for her cottage, a car with insurance, her utilities, food and her Vicadin addiction.
Clarkson had the looks and appeal to be a great porn star but sidestepped that temptation. That to me shows she was making a better choice.
Her job as a hostess at the House of Blues put her face to face with aging music legend Phil Spector. Clarkson did not know Phil Spector, but joined him at his home after work. I’m convinced this was an opportunity to supplement her income with a low profile act of prostitution. There’s no question Clarkson needed any money she could get.
I don’t condemn Clarkson for doing what she had to do in order to try and survive. It should have never been a matter for public consumption. Hollywood is full of part-time hookers that later became stars. Many wanted to be stars but wound up as hookers and porn stars instead.
There are other unflattering things that came out about Clarkson. She often raided medicine cabinets of her friends in search of drugs for her addiction. She swindled several friends out of as much as $60,000.00 to finance a vanity film she wanted to use as a demo to showcase her act. The demo tape was an entertainment disaster. I’m sure she expected her stalled career to move and she’d pay back her friends in full. It just did not happen.
Clarkson’s hopes and dreams evaporated. A 40 year old woman with no marketable skills was out of luck and money. That left her even more despondent and hurting. This is incredibly sad but often repeated scenario in Hollywood. If someone could have whispered to Clarkson before she left school, “Lana, don’t quit, stay in school.” Maybe there would have been a much better ending.
While very drunk in Spector’s home Clarkson found a gun. I’m convinced horseplay began and an accident or suicide resulted. There were no witnesses. People are left to guess, speculate or wonder what really happened.
Found by police on a sink, were a pair of false eyelashes. On Phil Spector’s Scrotum Saliva belong to Clarkson was found. On one of Clarkson’s breasts Spector’s Saliva was found. This supports the prostitution angle since she was a stranger to Phil Spector.
Clarkson’s friends and family have been in immense pain. They blame the record producer just because he’s an easy target. The evidence for murder or manslaughter is just not there. Lana Clarkson is not coming back. She’s dead.
I grieve for Clarkson’s mother and sister. They did not deserve their loss. There is nothing for them to do but move on and make the best of their lives. We are all in this together and none of us will be leaving this world alive.
I hope people can still smile about some good times with Lana Clarkson. I’m sure there must be some great memories.
Clarkson should live on in an image she created of the hopeful starlet that had beauty and worth even though she was never properly recognized on the Boulevard of Broken Dreams.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Monday, September 03, 2007
The Phil Spector Trial Through The Eyes And Ears Of Linda Deutsch
In Los Angeles there is the undisputed Queen of court journalism. She is the above all, copiously objective and avoids commentary on the cases she reports. She’s sharp as a tack and fair until it hurts.
I was blessed to be able to chat with this master wordsmith over a short lunch during the Robert Blake murder trial and learned a bit about Ms. Deutsch. I already knew she has a warehouse full of awards for her writings over the years.
Ms. Deutsch told me about her policy never to take sides or dare predict the too often unpredictable verdicts of the trials she’s assigned to cover. When you inquire about a story this gal is covering you never have to say, “Just the facts ma’am.”
Columnists and commentators are the ones that give their opinions to the masses. Reporters on the other hand are given the task to simply report the naked truth. Few reporters can mask their personal opinions and tell it like it is as Linda Deutsch does so well.
Here is a shot biography of Linda Deutsch:
Ms. Deutsch has been a special correspondent for the Associated Press in Los Angeles, California since 1967. She has been a journalist for 40 years reporting on many high profile trials including the criminal and civil trial of O.J. Simpson, for which she was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize and awarded the Oliver Gramling award by the Associated Press. Ms. Deutsch covered the trials of Exxon Valdez skipper Joseph Hazelwood, Rodney King, the Menendez brothers, and of Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski. She has also covered Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, the assassination attempts on President Gerald Ford, and the evacuation of Vietnam after the fall of Saigon. She received her bachelor’s degree from Monmouth University in New Jersey. Ms. Deutsch has received many awards including the Missouri School of Journalism’s Honor Medal for Distinguished Service in Journalism and the Society of Professional Journalists’ First Amendment Award.
For the past four years Linda Deutsch has doggedly covered the Phil Spector case. She has reported on the good, bad and the ugly of this sordid tale. I think this time Ms. Deutsch’s brutal honesty has tipped her hand when She called the case an “intriguing murder mystery”. That tells me above all else, that the state was unable to prove their case
Here is Linda Deutsch’s wrap story on the end of the evidentiary portion of the Phil Spector murder trial.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Prosecutor Alan Jackson Is A Jackass
Irene Elizabeth Laughlin has the unusual alias of “Punkin Pie” She was Lana Clarkson’s very best Friend until her tragic apparent suicide at record producer Phil Spector’s home four years ago.
Laughlin was called to testify as a defense witness to shed light on Clarkson’s state of mind before her death. Clarkson confided her hopes, dreams and failures, for years along with suicidal thoughts to Laughlin during the period just before her life ended.
Laughlin has a heavy burden to deal with, and that’s the guilt of perhaps not having done enough to see that Clarkson got help from mental health professionals and instead tried to cheer up her profoundly depressed friend herself. That obviously did not work and Clarkson died.
Laughlin’s testimony also revealed that the Clarkson family lawyer and others essentially tampered with a witness (Laughlin) in a criminal investigation by telling Laughlin to withhold information about Clarkson’s suicidal thoughts. That may have been what caused the cops to go after Spector since everyone close to Clarkson tried to paint a Clarkson as a happy and hopeful women who’d never kill herself. That effort nearly worked until Laughlin could no longer live with that deception and came clean with Spector’s defense tem after they contacted and interviewed her.
Was there a motive to place the blame on the wealthy Phil Spector to collect money from him by those trying to cover up Clarkson’s alcoholism, drug use, depression and suicidal remarks? One could also argue that the cover-up was done to protect Clarkson’s public persona and memory.
Now comes prosecutor Alan Jackson, angry that his case for murder is flushing down the toilet as the truth surfaces during the trial. Jackson spent the day degrading Laughlin and accusing her of making her testimony up for a book deal that never existed. Jackson continually tortured the witness by rubbing her face into her failure to make an effort to notify authorities about Clarkson’s mental state to gain some sort of professional intervention.
It was laughable when Jackson tried to suggest that a crappy $9.00 an hour job at the House of Blues was somehow a wonderful and uplifting professional move for the 40 year-old Clarkson who spent her entire adult life trying to get her entertainment career of the ground.
Jackson came off as the Jackass of the trial by his behavior against this grieving witness.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Oh dear, my friends, Kelley seems to be at a loss for words. She is now posting things written 6 or more months ago. Perhaps she will just get tired and go to bed. Perhaps, she will stay there for, say, 6 months and give us all a break.
November 26th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
Oh Me, Oh My. I’m posting credible and extremely relevant arguments made Paul Huebl - including on entitiled “Alan Jackson’s A Jackass.” I thought Gianelli-Blogonaut might find Paul as convincing as I did.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
P.S. Credible and relevant arguments made “by” Paul Hubel. It doesn’t matter that they were made 6 months ago. They are valid. You aren’t being forced to visit this Blog, insult, and slander me, are you Sydney? I thought not.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
Correction: The justice system was not set up to frame innocent people. If Phil Spector is inncent that is a valid basis for arguing that charges should never have been brought, etc. Why should I be careful what I “wsh” for Green - you’re not granting the wishes, are you? You are, however - to me, a moron.
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
Make no mistakes about this, Green - the justice system was set up to frame innocent people. You are harassing me and I see right through you.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass ot\
hers. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
November 26th, 2009 at 9:24 pm
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: DOJ - Clarkson Family Lawyern & Witness Tampering
To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, “Maurice Smith” , “Duane” , Governor.ritter@state.co.us, governor@governor.ca.gov, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, teresa.low@doj.ca.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, pio@lapd.lacity.org, oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org, chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 1:22 AM
To the Department of Justice,
Do you think this story is ugly and/or vulgar enough? There are public allegatoins that the Clarkson family’s lawyer “tampered” with a witness in a criminal investigation by telling Laughlin to withhold information about Clarkson’s suicidal thoughts. The coroner was apparently told not to investigate this as an accident and not to do a psychological autopsy - which really bothered Paul Huebl. I have never in my life heard of anything like this. There are two suicides, destroyed lives, an innocent man in prison, and so many crimes it is unbelievable. Steve Cooley should be held personally responsible for this insanity, the waste of government resources, and the damage he and his office have done. If you think that this was all done for careers and money and because one man could not pay his taxes it is unbearably shameless.
I guess Jackson and others think people do not see right through them. They are sadly mistaken and this bullying is outlandish conduct. I want to know if he is connected to it.
All the best,
Kelley
Laughlin’s testimony also revealed that the Clarkson family lawyer and others essentially tampered with a witness (Laughlin) in a criminal investigation by telling Laughlin to withhold information about Clarkson’s suicidal thoughts.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
Did you catch that, folks? Arguments made 6 months ago relate to LC and PS right here and now. She actually thinks she can out-smart intelligent and well educated people. Blogonaut, she thought you would find the writer convincing - convincing of what? Of course, nothing in those postings relates to anything here on this blog. But that is no surprise coming from Kelley Lynch. And then she asks if I am being forced to visit this blog and insult her. Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Where do you think you are, Sydney - in a circus? The ringleader? Paul Huebl’s articles are very relevant and credible - t Phil Spector. Obviously they have nothng whatsoever to do with Leonard Cohen. Don’t be ridiculously absurd. What intelligent and educated people? No one on this Blog seems exceptionally intelligent or educated. I just posted these articles to Gianelli-Blogonaut can see credible artguemts re. a set up.
These articles relate to ths BLog. You are all discussing Phil Spector and you personally, Sydney, have posted on Blogonaut’s Blog at least two times abou the Spector matter.
Don’t insult my intelligence with your moronic rants.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
Did you catch that, folks? Arguments made 6 months ago relate to LC and PS right here and now. She actually thinks she can out-smart intelligent and well educated people. Blogonaut, she thought you would find the writer convincing - convincing of what? Of course, nothing in those postings relates to anything here on this blog. But that is no surprise coming from Kelley Lynch. And then she asks if I am being forced to visit this blog and insult her. Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
Take a good hard look in the mirror. You are talking about yourself. You cannot insult me. I think you are moronic, yet crimnal, idiots. I am merely documenting your slander and refuting your attacks.
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Sydney Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.
November 26th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
P.S. Yes, let’s take a page from Aan Jackson’s playbook - when you have no argument, no legal positions, no evidence to support your lies and “theories,” call people sluts. Gossip. Lie. Slander. Malign. Defame. Shoot the messenger. Go to the hairdresser.
November 26th, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Spector’s Limo Driver’s Story Folds…
Limo driver Adriano DeSouza described the Colt Cobra accurately. He said it was a black gun with brown grips. But it was not in Phil Spector’s hand in this exact pose DeSouza demonstrated in court as he’s claimed. If this Colt Cobra revolver was in Spector’s hand DeSouza would have never even seen the grips.
This startled limo driver simply assumed the gun was in Spector’s hand. If Adriano DeSouza really believes his own story we can only suspect in all the excitement his assumptions became his own reality.
When police found Clarkson and the gun this is what they saw. The brown grips are clearly visible on this gun at Clarkson’e feet. It’s uncontested that DeSouza saw Clarkson slumped in the chair as this photo reveals.
November 26th, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Spector Lawyer Guts the Prosecutor
Left to right Roger Jay Rosen, Phil Spector and Linda Kinney-Baden
Spector’s lead lawyer, Bruce Cuttler has his brash style but leading the charge in the defense opening statement is Linda Kenney-Baden. Kenney-Baden specializes in forensic evidence matters that will make or break this case. Kenney-Baden shot the prosecutions theory full of holes and promised to deliver a who’s who list of forensic experts that will make it clear to the jury that Lana Clarkson died by her own hand.
Linda Kenney-Baden is an gifted lawyer, author and happenes to be the wife of leading forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden. So far this attorney has made an impressive splash into Spector’s legal nightmare. Kenney-Baben has the right stuff to satisfy any CSI influenced jury members. She has a knack for explaining complicated scientific evidence with short sentences and simple words.
Today the tables turned in the Spector trial circus. Folks you heard it from me Phil Spector is going to get his life back.
November 27th, 2009 at 12:28 am
I wonder why Dr. James Pex was targeted and acused of perjury?
Christine said…
UNBELIEVABLE!!!
They just went toooooo far, didn’t they? Wow!
I was thinking this witness was the one who could make or break the case.
Wonder what dinner is like up at the castle tonight.
If Court TV had any brains at all they would have put cameras in for this case. It is really a doozy! I can hardly wait to read the full report tonight!
February 11, 2009 7:09 PM
November 27th, 2009 at 12:51 am
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Diane Ogden’s Son
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:49 AM
Thinley Norbu Rinpoche, Karmapa, Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche,
Read this. It is horrible and heartbreaking. The devastation of these trials is inconceivable.
Imagine the pressure on Diane Ogden.
Love,
Kelley
sean ogden said
July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: I Wonder Who Posted All This Stuff?
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:47 AM
To the Department of Justice,
Could Dr. Pex have made or broken the case? There is a reason he was read his rights in the courtroom. Alan Jackson has attempted to undermine and destroy the careers of five major expert scientists. It cannot be that hard to talk to them and Phil Spector’s legal team - including Bruce Cutler.
Reread Mr. Cutler’s opening argument and Juror #9’s interview on Court TV. A set up hardly begins to describe this ugly, vicious, nasty story.
How do you force a gun into someone’s mouth? That is absurd.
I have no doubt that this was intentional and planned. David Moorhead told me this would never have happened in Colorado and was an automatic appeal. Makes one wonder about “federal law.”
Alan Jackson, lead prosecutor for the state, “cut the defense to the knees” by not bringing in Spector’s own statements during his opening argument. A preposterous, ludicous law - which makes the playing field uneven in favor of the prosecution so probably illegal.
“But Alan Jackson decided not to even *mention* the statements in opening arguments, a strategy that Cutler found devastating to not only his opening statement, but his entire defense, he told Judge Fidler.”
“Under California law, statements suspects give to law enforcement are *only* admissible by the prosecution. They are considered “hearsay” if the defense admits them, and that is not allowed. So now Cutler was faced with an opening statement that was wholly un presentable and a case that he needed to entirely overhaul.”
http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/spector-refresher-opening-statements-and-admissions/
The internet campaign to demonize Phil Spector and silence people who speak up about him (me, Nat McBride - who received a “death threat”) is unbelievable. And then there are the emails “criminally impersonating” Bruce Cutler. Now, I can assure you that I wouldn’t do this because my friend was on trial and his life is in jeopardy but it demands an investigation.
Does the Department of Justice understand how Larry Fidler demanded that Phillip take the stand in order to permit Baby Doll Gibson to testify? How is that legal when Phillip has the right to 5th Amendment protection.
And then there’s this. Nat asked a good question - how do you put a witness on the stand who cannot be cross examined? There are - obviously - two suicides here connected with drugs. One with a gun involved. Paul Huebll’s theory was that Alhambra PD screwed up and that’s where the set up began - they realized they had tasered an innocent man and were exposed to civil liability. Paul Huebl, I might point out, was Chicago PD. He also mentioned that actors play with prop guns and the prop masters repeatedly have to warn the actors about this.
Judge Fidler throws a bone to the defense. “Without fully ruling, I don’t see why you can’t comment that you would not have questioned the witness this way. Fidler then reminds the people (since they haven’t brought it up yet) about their motion to exclude the defense from bringing into the trial Ms. Ogden’s cause of death. Judge Fidler then says he will approach this, …”working backwards. I won’t rule on that issue of excluding Ms. Ogden’s cause of death because (they) have to wait and see what discovery shows regarding cause of death.”
Look at Katprint’s comments here. It sounds like intentional jury tampering.
Katprint: Do you think there’s a fundamental difference between juries in Northern vs. Southern California?
I fear the jury pool in L.A. is tainted by celebritymania (or as you said, their brains are fried by the sun) if we go by the south’s wrong-headed verdicts in OJ Simpson, Robert Blake, & Spector 1 vs. the north’s conviction of Scott Peterson & Hans Reiser.
http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/spector-refresher-opening-statements-and-admissions/
This is horrendous:
sean ogden said
July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU
http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/spector-refresher-opening-statements-and-admissions/
In a July 30 Los Angeles Time story, Harriet Ryan wrote:
“Ogden died in December of an accidental overdose of a prescription medication.”
All the best,
Kelley
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: I Wonder Who Posted All This Stuff?
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:29 AM
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 12:28 am
I wonder why Dr. James Pex was targeted and acused of perjury?
Christine said…
UNBELIEVABLE!!!
They just went toooooo far, didn’t they? Wow!
I was thinking this witness was the one who could make or break the case.
Wonder what dinner is like up at the castle tonight.
If Court TV had any brains at all they would have put cameras in for this case. It is really a doozy! I can hardly wait to read the full report tonight!
February 11, 2009 7:09 PM
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: I Wonder Who Posted All This Stuff?
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:27 AM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2009/02/phil-spector-retrial-jackson-accuses.html
This sounds like Alan Jackson. I guess he really did think that Dr. Pex could make or break this case.
Christine said…
UNBELIEVABLE!!!
They just went toooooo far, didn’t they? Wow!
I was thinking this witness was the one who could make or break the case.
Wonder what dinner is like up at the castle tonight.
If Court TV had any brains at all they would have put cameras in for this case. It is really a doozy! I can hardly wait to read the full report tonight!
February 11, 2009 7:09 PM
November 27th, 2009 at 12:52 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bOk_TWMQjY
sean ogden said
July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU
November 27th, 2009 at 12:57 am
On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Garrison Courtney - DEA
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, “Duane”
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:55 AM
Hello Garrison Courtney,
Why don’t you take a look at Sean Ogden’s comments about his mother and her death - and slow poisoning. You don’t find this story brutal, do you? I personally think this situation is horrifying - from a human standpoint. There appear to be two suicides and countless devastated lives. There also happen to be a bunch of thugs targeting me on Phawker.com and some of them appear to have real motive.
All the best,
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 12:52 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bOk_TWMQjY
sean ogden said
July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU
November 27th, 2009 at 2:22 am
Their coming to take you away, ha ha ho ho hee hee
To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all time ha ha ho ho hee hee…
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
As if dragging you own children deep into you personal pool of quick sand, now you intend to drag Dian Ogden’s son down with you. Just who the hell do you think you are?
November 27th, 2009 at 2:47 am
I believe it was yesterday, you stated you helped other children with camp fees, tuition, tutors, etc. While it’s admirable you helped those less fortunate, I’m amazed you didn’t establish a college fund for your children. Or did you have an established college fund? If you did have such a fund, did you loot that, too?
Another thing, did Rutger have your POA when SWAT descended upon you? If he didn’t, then it’s just your fantasy that anyone asked him to sign over your property to Cohen. You are living proof of the old adage: tell yourself something enough times and you’ll start to believe it’s true.
November 27th, 2009 at 2:48 am
Actually, Kelley, the subject header of your email addressed to Alan Jackson reads: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters.
November 27th, 2009 at 2:52 am
Kelley, from whom did you steal your 11/26/09, 8:40 PM, 8:41 PM, 8:42, 8:43 PM, 8:44 PM, 8:46 PM, 8:46PM, 10:02 PM, 10:04 PM, and 11/27/09 12:28 AM postings? Didn’t you steal these posting and published articles from others? There’s nothing to indicate you reprinted any of them with the authors’ permission. Stealing from the AP (your first 8:46 PM) is especially egregious and AP does take criminal and civil action. Let’s not forget, Linda Deutch was Spectors greatest supporter and fan. Linda Deutch never said a bad word about Spector. Oh, I remember, you don’t give a flying fig about other people’s copyrights.
November 27th, 2009 at 2:53 am
As far as your public allegations regarding the Clarkson’s attorney tampering with a witness—well, actually, Kelley, you’re the only person raising that allegation. No credible person has raised that issue.
November 27th, 2009 at 3:00 am
Green, I don’t recall saying I had advisers and that would not be any of your business, would it? I am not here to fulfill your fantasies or satisfy your curiosity. I am on this Blog, now, because a number of people - you included “Kelly Green” - have decided to target, attack, slander, defame, libel, threaten, harass, attempt to intimidate me, etc. Clearly this is a highly organized campaign of cyber-terrorists out to silence me, undermine me demean me, etc. Were it not - you would not be obsessed with me and/or these Blog posts, Cohen’s tax fraud, the Phil Spector matter, or insulting my intelligence with your banal (and frequently aggressive) rants/posts.
Fortunately, you will not be involved in any relationship I have with my attorney. I will remind you, again, that we not know one another.
For the record, I don’t care if you’re a man or a woman. It’ your conduct and words I am documenting. Unnterested in your boring and gratuitous madness remarks. How’s this - “ditto.” I will bring your remarks about “prison” to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, and Treasury. I think you are attempting to intimidate me so that I won’t testify against Leonard Cohen. Seems obvious. I’ll ask “the feds” to “pay careful”attention to your remarks about Susan and prison - also your IP address, real identity, etc.
My children aren’t involved in this but their lives have been destroyed. What’s your interest in my children - further intimidation and threatening tacics. Try it on your mother. t’s not working with me. I wil advise “the feds” that I believe you are threatening my childen again.
I din’t steal any dcuments from Cohen. He perjured himself and the Sheriff’s Department illegally seized many many documents - meant for the IRS. The IRS has many many documents and people can subpoena them drectly from the IRS. I own 99.5% of Traditional Holdngs and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and am entitled to these records. I am also entitled to provide the IRS with evidence supporting the deadly serious allegations of criminal tax fraud. Dicuss all of this with the IRS. I have nothing further to say on the topic and that is most definitely an IRS matter since all documents are now in their possession. Maybe the judge at LA Superior Court who wilfully overlooked corporate records, stock certificates, notarized documents, and the fact that I wasn’t a trustee can comman the IRS and “the feds” around.
I will bring you threats of Rutger and prison to the attention of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko and demand immediate assistance and intervention as your aggression has now increased - as have your threats. Rutger aided and abetted nothing. Go into court and prove that’s where the documents were.
I understand that my posts defending Phil Spector are disturbing - in particular, the post of Diane Ogden’s son. I have asked the DEA to investigate her death and they should speak directly to her son.
I think I’m a woman who was dragged into Phil Spector’s matter and had my life destroyed because I reported criminal tax fraud (Cohen’s). Who the hell do you think you are? Sammy Gravano?
Kelley Lynch
November 27th, 2009 at 3:11 am
Green, nothing about my personal life, finances, or anything else is your business. Why don’t you establish colege fund for needy children if you find tha so admirable.
Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, the FBI, and the Treasury may discuss issues re. SWAT and any possible POA that “Rutger” had. You are a vicious, aggressive individual who is threatening me, threatening my children, and attacking me. I have asked the IRS for immediate protection from you and the others threatening me, have advised them that I believe you are danerously unstabe, and have “motive.”
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:47 am
I believe it was yesterday, you stated you helped other children with camp fees, tuition, tutors, etc. While it’s admirable you helped those less fortunate, I’m amazed you didn’t establish a college fund for your children. Or did you have an established college fund? If you did have such a fund, did you loot that, too?
Another thing, did Rutger have your POA when SWAT descended upon you? If he didn’t, then it’s just your fantasy that anyone asked him to sign over your property to Cohen. You are living proof of the old adage: tell yourself something enough times and you’ll start to believe it’s true.
November 27th, 2009 at 3:16 am
As usual, Kelley, you are the only one who thinks there’s a remote possibility you could be a helpful witness to anyone. You cherry pick words from the cogent statements of others—and you spin them it into fantasy.
It’s late, and you are boring. A rational person would be ashamed of herself for taking up so much bandwidth of anothers blog. Again, you seem to think if you keep repeating and reposting others posts and emails, that the repeated postings will make you more credible. They do not, you are not, and you never will be credible. Since 8:40 PM (11/26?09) you stole 10 postings/articles from others. And you posted each one here in hopes others would think you wrote them.
Since spring 2009, you’ve been repeating the same thing over and over and over again.
Your repeated responses and repeated postings are like those of a high school student. You remember, the one who always thought she was smarter and more clever than everyone else. And like a petulant highschooler, you foolishly think you wrote one great thesis—and you think you’re soooo much smarter than everyone else. And like a highschooler, you think all you have to do is change a few words–and voila—you have a new, up-to-date paper. It’s not until you get to college and you turn in that same paper, then you learn you’re just not that smart and clever afterall. So, Kelley, it’s time to tell you that you’re not that great or smart, and you need to come up with some new responses.
It’s time for you to get a new schtick.
November 27th, 2009 at 3:18 am
Yes, Kelley, all the posters on the internet got together and decided that you would the one person to be picked on.
You can do better than that.
November 27th, 2009 at 3:20 am
At any time, Kelley, you can open your blog so others can post. You choose not to. Why? What are you afraid of?
November 27th, 2009 at 3:22 am
Green,
I know what the “header” - subject line - read on my email to Alan Jackson. I think Jackson, a government lawyer, should be clear not to destroy any evidence whatsoever that relates to his communications with Gianelli-Blogonaut or anyone associated with that Blog and posting on this Blog. That would include Michelle Blaine.
I figured you, Green, would be weighing in on the postings I used from Paul Huebl’s site. Do you represent Paul, whom Ive spoken with, or have you been contacted by Paul about these posts? If not - mind your own business and I’ll give Paul a head’s up.
I realize that Linda Deutsch has also come under attack from the anti-Spector camp.
Actually Paul Huebl raised the issue re. the Clarkson family lawyer and witness tampering. I only posted what he wrote. Please threaten Paul Huebl directly. Paul’s credible. He is an investigator, attended at least one of the trials, was Chicago PD.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:48 am
Actually, Kelley, the subject header of your email addressed to Alan Jackson reads: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:52 am
Kelley, from whom did you steal your 11/26/09, 8:40 PM, 8:41 PM, 8:42, 8:43 PM, 8:44 PM, 8:46 PM, 8:46PM, 10:02 PM, 10:04 PM, and 11/27/09 12:28 AM postings? Didn’t you steal these posting and published articles from others? There’s nothing to indicate you reprinted any of them with the authors’ permission. Stealing from the AP (your first 8:46 PM) is especially egregious and AP does take criminal and civil action. Let’s not forget, Linda Deutch was Spectors greatest supporter and fan. Linda Deutch never said a bad word about Spector. Oh, I remember, you don’t give a flying fig about other people’s copyrights.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:53 am
As far as your public allegations regarding the Clarkson’s attorney tampering with a witness—well, actually, Kelley, you’re the only person raising that allegation. No credible person has raised that issue.
November 27th, 2009 at 3:25 am
I guess all we can do is hope the IRS takes an immediate interest in you and your welfare. Hopefully, they will put you someplace where you will have no internet access, and for the sake of your family, no access to them either. Your family deserves better treatment than they’ve gotten from you. Why does your son always draw the short straw?
November 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am
Well, at least you’ve confirmed you stole 10 articles/postings from others—and you don’t even have the decency to cite the sources. You’ve also confirmed you just don’t give a damn. Oh well, Once a thief…
November 27th, 2009 at 3:38 am
Kelly Green, here is a copy of my email to Paul Huebl regarding all articles I posted here that originally appeared on his Blog. I don’t think you can accuse me of stealing when Paul Huebl has not. He is the one that raised the issue with respect to the Clarkson family’s lawyer and witness tampering. I brought that to te attention of the DOJ and FBI. All posts were borrowed from Paul. I’ll privately discuss any concerns with him drectly - unless you are representing him in some way. Ive asked him to take a look at this Blog and your posts in particular. I’ve spoken with Paul, who raised the allegation that Clarkson family lawyer tampered with a witness, and - trust me - he’s credible. Very very credible. Also, an incredibly decent human being who believes in justice.
His copyrights are not your concern now are they, Green? Your threats about me an my son are my concern though, aren’t they? In fact, you could wind up in prison for your conduct and actions on this site if I’m not mistaken. Perhaps the DOJ and/or FBI have some thoughts on that. Not everyone is stupid. You are not deceiving everyone. Perhaps your arrogance has realy gone to your head and you can’t really tell that “We see right through you.” No, I will not tell you who “we” is or who represents me. You’ll see us in court. It’s irrelevant whether you believe that. I’m merely docmenting your threats, the issues you are obsessed with, your attacks, your slander, your lies, and the fact that I think you are trash - as evidenced by your crass and vulgar posts. I also think your posts are evidene that you are dangerously unstable and delusonal if you think you are going to threaten me and my children and get away with it legally.
Over to you, LIAR.
KeleyLynch
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Paul Huebl
To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, “Duane” , housedick@gmail.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 7:28 AM
Hello Paul,
I am being accused, now, of stealing your posts about Phil Spector. I posted them on Phawker.com and “Kelly Green” is now incredibly upset and threatening me. It has also threatened my son Rutger with prison - based on the fact that I provided the IRS with documents relating to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Apparently, these articles (of yours) upset people on Phawker.com - as did Diane Ogden’s son’s incredibly tragic posting about his mother’s final days and her slow poisoning. Apparently “Green” - who is a vicious thug and liar targeting me and my children and absolutely obsessed with Phillip’s matter - never heard the allegations you raised on your Blog about the Clarkson family lawyer and witness tampering. I brought it to the attention of the DOJ which is probably what really upset “Green.”
Take a look at what’s going on with this Blog - it includes criminal harassment, terrorist threats and/or threats, witness tampering, an attempt to derail/obstruct justice with respect to a potential and/or pending federal criminal prosecution, cyber-terrorism, stalking, you-name-it. They sky’s the limit when it comes to this crowd and criminal conduct. The arrogance and their crassness is appalling.
I trust you’re well.
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-213821
All the best,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 3:46 am
Kelly Green,
I do hope the IRS takes immediate action. The threats and aggression - yours included - are clearly escallating and extend to my children. Don’t worry about how the IRS or others decide to protet me. It is not your business and I do not know you.
Why are you so obsessed and fixated with Rutger? Because he witnessed SWAT, ws asked to go in and transfer my house to Cohen, and has seen so much during this ordeal? Or, is it due to the fact that an attorney told us he was probably a material “witness” in the Phil Spector matter?
No I did not confirm any such thing, Green. You are just proving you are a liar. I tend to doubt you represent Paul Huebl. I posted my email to him above. Check out his Blog. I believe there are more Phil Spector related posts. Paul certainly does seem to have a handle on Phillip’s “matter.”
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:25 am
I guess all we can do is hope the IRS takes an immediate interest in you and your welfare. Hopefully, they will put you someplace where you will have no internet access, and for the sake of your family, no access to them either. Your family deserves better treatment than they’ve gotten from you. Why does your son always draw the short straw?
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am
Well, at least you’ve confirmed you stole 10 articles/postings from others—and you don’t even have the decency to cite the sources. You’ve also confirmed you just don’t give a damn. Oh well, Once a thief…
November 27th, 2009 at 3:55 am
Paul Huebl’s Blog - Interesting Articles on the Phil Spector set up. Thanks Paul.
http://www.crimefilenews.com/2008/05/barack-obama-on-self-defense-and-gun.html
November 27th, 2009 at 4:02 am
I’m not afraid of anything - obviously - and I am not going to be silenced on terrorized by brainless, moronic thugs who are engaged in what I beleive is crminal activity that definitely seems to relate to Leonard Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud Matter, Phil Spector, and undermining me and me children - as witnesses (in any potential and/or pending federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen or possibly Phil Spector … probably not the appeal, however, as nothing was raised on the “record” about these issues although I did fax the judge and faxed a copy of that commnication to Doron Weinberg).
I don’t want to open comments on my Blog. How’s that for an answer?
I don’t think all the posters on the internet got together to target and attack me but I think a well-organized campaign of cyber-terrorism is underway and I believe the motive is to undemine my credibility as a witness, Rutger’s credibility as a witness, to derail/obstruct a possible federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen (surely the L.A. “DA” needs to keep him credible, etc.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:18 am
Yes, Kelley, all the posters on the internet got together and decided that you would the one person to be picked on.
You can do better than that.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:20 am
At any time, Kelley, you can open your blog so others can post. You choose not to. Why? What are you afraid of?
November 27th, 2009 at 4:11 am
If it’s so boring, Green, why are you so obsessed and fixated with me and these matters? Why are you threatening me, Rutger, and what is the reason for your aggression?
Actually, I think I’ve been repeating the same thing - with the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others copied in - since 2005. I provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff with tremendous evidence before Cohen’s fraudulent perjured ex parte hearing. That’s why he had one. They understood, because they (Scott Edelman, Ken Doron, Gibson Dumb and Dumber) were copied in on my emails, that I was sending every document and every piece of evidence I had (stored for Cohen for years - Steven Machat even confirmed this … he was there when Cohen came into NYC and knows Cohen advised the to hand over everything to me after Marty Machat’s death and instructed me to take it t my apartment). Get your facts straight. The IRS has been in possession of this evidence since 2005. If you have any issues wth that write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff directly at *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov. Maybe they can figure out why you are threatenng me and Rutger with prison for evidence I turned over to them.
Give me a break with your lectures. If you don’t like what I have to say or can’t tiolerate the truth tear yourself away from this Blog and get a life.
I didn’t hope someone thought I wrote Paul Huebl’s articles/postings. You are an outrageous con artist and calculated liar and terrorist.
It’s time for you to realize that you are engaging in criminal activity - including threatening me, etc. Thanks for noting that you are an arrogant idiot, however. Point well taken and duly noted.
It’s time for you to get a lawyer.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:16 am
As usual, Kelley, you are the only one who thinks there’s a remote possibility you could be a helpful witness to anyone. You cherry pick words from the cogent statements of others—and you spin them it into fantasy.
It’s late, and you are boring. A rational person would be ashamed of herself for taking up so much bandwidth of anothers blog. Again, you seem to think if you keep repeating and reposting others posts and emails, that the repeated postings will make you more credible. They do not, you are not, and you never will be credible. Since 8:40 PM (11/26?09) you stole 10 postings/articles from others. And you posted each one here in hopes others would think you wrote them.
Since spring 2009, you’ve been repeating the same thing over and over and over again.
Your repeated responses and repeated postings are like those of a high school student. You remember, the one who always thought she was smarter and more clever than everyone else. And like a petulant highschooler, you foolishly think you wrote one great thesis—and you think you’re soooo much smarter than everyone else. And like a highschooler, you think all you have to do is change a few words–and voila—you have a new, up-to-date paper. It’s not until you get to college and you turn in that same paper, then you learn you’re just not that smart and clever afterall. So, Kelley, it’s time to tell you that you’re not that great or smart, and you need to come up with some new responses.
It’s time for you to get a new schtick.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:23 am
Kelly Green, write Garrison Courtney/DEA and threaten him about speaking with Diane Ogden’s son. Maybe the DEA is afraid of terrorists like yourselves or, perhaps, they know how to identify you. That’s more likely. I don’t believe for a moment that anyone can post anonymously.
Kelley Lynch
November 27th, 2009 at 4:27 am
Actually Green - do you speak for and/or represent the IRS, Phil Spector, me, or my children? I didn’t think so. Continuing to address your hysterical and threats etc.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:16 am
As usual, Kelley, you are the only one who thinks there’s a remote possibility you could be a helpful witness to anyone.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:35 am
Ok, Green, I googled Polk. I’m not married. Any other irrelevant matters/issues you want to address?
Can you put Rutger in prison? If so, how do you anicipate doing that and what is your connection to Leonard Cohen, the District Attorney of Los Angeles, the Clarkson Family, Steven Clark Lindsey, and others involved in Cohen’s Crminal Tax Fraud Matter and Phil Spector’s set up - including Alan Jackson and Truc Do, Pat Dixn and Doug Sortino - and, let’s not forget “Steve Cooley,” Marco and law enforcement who has targeted me.
If you like to watch a train wreck you have a First Class front row seat of yourself careening out of control in slow motion. I’m aware that you are sick, sadistic, and twisted - probably dangerously unstable and maliciously angry and perverted also. Maybe an FBI profiler would have more insights into your “feminine traits” although I doubt they would jeopardize their lives dating someone like you with your violent fantasies and twisted, sadistic turn ons.
Here’s what I get - the documents are with the IRS. Write them and threaten them. Period.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
As if dragging you own children deep into you personal pool of quick sand, now you intend to drag Dian Ogden’s son down with you. Just who the hell do you think you are?
November 27th, 2009 at 8:11 am
Lynch I am not going to post your E-mails to me on this site, I have returned them to you. It is up to you if you wish to post them here, but since it is just repeating the same old stuff, why bother other bloggers with them
November 27th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Kelley, copyright issues are the concern of everyone. Taking credit for the work of others is shameful, illegal, and immoral. All you had to do was cite the source and get permission to reprint. I guess you really are that lazy. Once a thief…
November 27th, 2009 at 10:46 am
My actions will not land me in prison—your actions may. You’re right, Kelley, not everyone is stupid—JUST YOU!
November 27th, 2009 at 10:56 am
How do you know Kelley has lost the battle? She turns to personal insults: “Maybe an FBI profiler would have more insights into your “feminine traits” although I doubt they would jeopardize their lives dating someone like you with your violent fantasies and twisted, sadistic turn ons.”
For the record, Kelley, I’ve never put anyone’s life in jeopardy. I don’t need your dating advise. Who would? And, once again, “you are the only one who engages in spinning violent fantasie and twisted, sadistic turn ons.”
It’s truly unfortunate that you don’t have a life and that your family wants nothing to do with you.
November 27th, 2009 at 11:03 am
Apparently, you are too stupid to realize you and Susan Polk have a lot in common. You each descended into utter madness; you either have or you do think you’re the only person smart enough to handle your litigation; and you’ve each pulled your children into your personal pit of quick sand.
Such a sad, sad life you live Kelley. And it’s all of your own making.
November 27th, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Kelly Green - We are now witnessing one sorry excuse of a human being spiraling down into complete and utter madness. And have you noticed that not only has she hijacked this thread about Leonard Cohen, but she has also turned it into a thread about Phil Spector and the fairness of his trial(s). This woman is incredibly inventive and imaginative. Can you just imagine where she might be if she put what’s left of her brain to GOOD and quit fixating on people she doesn’t even know. To hear her talk, she knows everyone in the world and they will come to court because she’s going to subpoena every person she has ever encountered on-line. I, for one, am anxiously awaiting mine any day now.
November 27th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
Green, obviously you have no legal understanding of copyrights and/or credits. I do. Paul Huebl is aware that I’ve posted the articles and he is the only one I will address on this issue. Once an idiot liar with “motive” …
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Kelley, copyright issues are the concern of everyone. Taking credit for the work of others is shameful, illegal, and immoral. All you had to do was cite the source and get permission to reprint. I guess you really are that lazy. Once a thief…
November 27th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
I don’t know if it was a personal insult. I thought it was accurate. The FBI may, however, find your vile, repulsive, hostile attacks on me incredibly sexy and feminine. Depends on what the agent can stomach. To each their own ….
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 10:56 am
How do you know Kelley has lost the battle? She turns to personal insults: “Maybe an FBI profiler would have more insights into your “feminine traits” although I doubt they would jeopardize their lives dating someone like you with your violent fantasies and twisted, sadistic turn ons.”
For the record, Kelley, I’ve never put anyone’s life in jeopardy. I don’t need your dating advise. Who would? And, once again, “you are the only one who engages in spinning violent fantasie and twisted, sadistic turn ons.”
It’s truly unfortunate that you don’t have a life and that your family wants nothing to do with you.
November 27th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Kelley Lynch is a Johnny-come-lately Phil Spector “supporter”.
Phil Spector’s close friends (and even some fans) attended at least one of Spector’s trial sessions as a show of support. Kelley Lynch never showed up once for any of the pretrial proceedings or any of the trial days for the two nine month trials—even though the Spectors were urging fans and friends to drop by and show their support on their website.
About two or three months before the end of the second trial Kelley Lynch launched her first blog that she entitled “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch”, a site that assumed that Spector would be acquitted and then Phil Spector would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team to JOIN Lynch in suing her imagined enemies, including the LAPD, and in suing Cohen.
But it was necessary for Kelley Lynch to make a case that her legal woes and Phil Spector’s legal problems were intertwined.
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
Of course, Leonard Cohen never testified against Phil Spector, and Phil Spector’s legal team never raised any claim that there was perjured testimony before the grand jury that indicted the music producer in the trial court—thus waiving that as a legal issue (if it ever was one).
It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join forces (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her, finally with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.
But, of course, it is fantasy constructed on the thinnest of foundations, because there never was any “linkage” between Kelley Lynch’s legal troubles and Phil Spector’s legal troubles—except that Lynch and Spector knew each other (it is not clear how well) years ago, and (she claims) dined together (in addition to how many others she has not said) after Clarkson’s death.
That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).
The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
In other words, Lynch has her hand out plain and simple.
That core motivation is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.
November 27th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Why do you answer my questions about how you intend to put my son, Rutger, in prison. Do you personally have an interest in the evidence I have provided the IRS - re. Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. What actions of mine - reporting tax fraud and documenting cyber-terrorist attacks that is well planned, organized, aggressive, and meant to undermine my credibility. Clearly you have motive to attack and threaten me. Why would Diane Ogden’s son’s post cause you to become so aggressive? I personally thought it was heartbreaking. His mother died and he mentions this “trial” and seems to be beside himself. Since Clarkson shot herself and Diane Ogden died of a drug overdose I absolutely think the DEA should step in - as an independent agency - and review what has gone on by interviewing parties such as Phil Spector (who witnessed the ordeal and told me it was devastating to see Clarkson shoot herself), his legal team - including Bruce Cutler, all forensic scientists (including those who believe they have intentionally been set up and accused of crimes) - such as Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. James Pex, Dr. Werner Spitz, and Dr. Vincent DeMaio. To assume that all of these men took the witness stand and lied for Phil Spector is absurd. The DEA may also have forensic scientists of their own who understand GSR, blood spatter, etc. I would assume the DOJ and FBI do as well which is precisely why I believe they should be involved in the investigation - particularly as it relates to crimes that have arisen due to civil rights violations: for instance, Phil Spector’s two trials. and Larry Fidler’s rulings. And, of course, the IRS should investigate why I was taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector en route. It seems that the District Attorney may have had the power and motive and I believe it was an attempt to prevent me from successfully reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and to prevent me from serving as a credible witness for the IRS. Cohen appears to have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury and - therefore - the District Attorney could have killed two birds with one stone and attempted to keep Cohen credible. I have no idea who falsified the entire King Drew file but no one is ever going to be able to explain it and it is my former address and Lindsey’s cell phone number.
Fine - I’m the only stupid one, Green. Then why are you all so obsessed with me, following me around the internet, slandering and lying about a complete stranger, threatening my son with “prison” over evidence I provided the IRS in the Cohen Criminal Tax Fraud Matter, focused on Phil Spector, and obviously attempting to silence me and my opinions.
The threats against my children are deadly serious. Pay close attention to that Green.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 10:46 am
My actions will not land me in prison—your actions may. You’re right, Kelley, not everyone is stupid—JUST YOU!
November 27th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
“Why do you answer my questions about how you intend to put my son, Rutger, in prison?”
No one has said they intend to have anyone criminally prosecuted except for YOU Kelley Lynch.
And YOU are the one that time and again injects Rutger Penick into this controversy. You assert that he cannot wait to joint you in your lawsuit, that he supports you 100%, and you copy your emails to Rutger (and to your sister Karen Lynch) to the IRS, The Department of The Treasury, agent Sopko, Blogonaut, Doron Weinberg, Governor Ritter, Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, the Department of Justice, Blogonaut, and many others, and often you also post those emails to your blog or on other blogs. (How twisted is that?)
But for you we would not even know that you had children or a sister–let alone their names and email addresses.
You have used your son for credibility, for sympathy, and have bizarrely made your private correspondence to him public. You also posted here that you stored financial and corporate documents related to Leonard Cohen (in violation of a court order, it turns out) in Rutgers’s storage room.
Rutger has you and you alone to thank for putting his name out there in the context of your legal woes and litigation threats.
Then you cry “OOOH, see, they are “attacking” or “targeting” or “threatening” my son now, OOOOH poor me”.
But we know all of your ways Kelley Lynch, and as long as you injected Blogonaut into this discussion we are more than willing to finish it.
November 27th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, It’s irrelevant what you think about why I didn’t attend Phil Spector’s set up trial. It proves absolutely nothing whatsoever. Mr. Spector himself can personally address this issue - if he thinks it’s worth it which I tend to doubt. It is, however, pathetic and lame.
For the record, I have never said I thought Phillip would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team but asked him to join me in suing the Los Angeles District Attorney, Cohen, Lindsey, and LAPD/Inglewood PD, etc. - because all of these parties were involved in the SWAT/King Drew incident. I was, as you know Gianelli-Blogonaut (and have even discussed this with people from the District Attorney’s office - specifically the fact that I was questioned about Phil Spector and the presence of Inglewood PD), questioned about Phil Spector en route and Rutger was, as you know, asked at that precise moment in time to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen and/or Kory - by Steven Clark Lindsey. I have not publicly discussed too many details about that incident but vividly recall the fact that my son’s life was endangered. Most parents in America would want justice for that. Even LAPP knows that I did not have a hostage. What I know is that Neal Greenberg’s lawsuit addresses the fact that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon “conspired” to have me falsely arrested that day and Boies Schiller told me I have a $25-50 million lawsuit against Los Angeles for the SWAT incident alone. They reviewed all the evidence and had at least one transcript of a conversation I had with Janis Zavala Spector where we both realized the District Attorney was lying - about various witnesses and what they had or had not witnessed with respect to Phil Spector and the fact that Cohen was all over the Phil Spector set up.
Call David Boies/Boies Schiller and tell him that I have an imagined lawsuit here - or lawsuits. Call Chris/Homeland Security and tell him I said - people with motive to attack me don’t want to admit that the District Attorney had the power and motive to drag me to King Drew and question me about Phil Spector. Everyone I speak to does and they also happen to mention that Los Angeles is incredibly corrupt. These are the opinions of a broad sampling the citizens of the United States of America who happen to believe that, in this instance, Phil Spector was set up by a a corrupt District Attorney and there are corrupt cops and others involved. In fact, it includes people in Colorado, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Washington, Virginia, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Texas - to name some states I’ve visited. I didn’t “flee” however. I have, however, noted the foolish attempts to raise that bogus issue.
In any event, please contact David Boies/Boies Schiller and ask him why his firm thought I had very serious lawsuits here and why they felt someone in the City of Los Angeles would take the fall. He’s copied in on my emails.
I haven’t made a legal case yet. You’ll know when I do because the Complaint will have been filed.
Have you reviewed all the grand jury testimony? Mick Brown/UK Telegraph seem convince, having review it, that Cohen testified against Phil Spector. He also, as I stated, appears in the prosecution’s “Motion In Limine” which - to me - is equally relevant. I have continuously stated - “if Mick Brown told me the truth” or something along those lines. You’re aware of that. You have confirmed that you are obsessively reading my Blogs and emails addressing your lies, slander, fraudulent allegations, witness tampering, attempts to obstruct justice and/or derail a federal criminal prosecution of Cohen, etc. These are obviously my personal opinions and they are also crimes - as was the fact that you lied to Agent Wynar/FBI. In fact, Gianelli-Blogonaut, I think it’s obvious that you should have asked the question about Agent Sopko/Treasury to Agent Sopko at the Treasury - rather than going to the FBI about Agent Sopko. This led me to conclude that you have attempted to interfere with a possible investigation into Cohen and other matters and wanted the FBI to spill the so-called beans (unwittingly) by confirming whether there is or is not a criminal tax fraud matter re. Cohen pending. You had Agent Sopko’s email address so why wouldn’t you have addressed questions about her and your “spam” allegations that relate to me - directly with Agent Sopko? Were you attempting to have the FBI investigate Agent Sopko? That’s also another possibility.
I have no idea what Cohen presumably did or did not testify about in Phillip’s grand jury. If he didn’t testify, as you have just flatly stated, then he testified about nothing whatsoever. Mick Brown-UK Telegraph will have to take responsibility for the fact that he emailed me that Cohen testified against Phillip and, in that instance, I did indeed rely on good faith information. Now, I am clearly stating “if Mick Brown told me the truth …” Very straightforward. You, however, have not modified or corrected your lies and slander that I am addressing (right now in fact) via these posts and my emails. Cohen’s legal issues are still relevant - he appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine. I dont’ think it was a benign reading exercise the prosecution threw in - do you?
Please do not attempt to speak for Phil Spector. Continue to speak for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Agent Sopko (also continue to insult her by calling her my “pet” federal agent if you like), Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Bruce Cutler but do not speak for Phil Spector who is going to receive a copy of this Blog’s comments as they relate to me and Rutger - in prison - together with my letter to his prosecutor Alan Jackson. As you know, Investigator Frayeh thought you were a shady character after you contacted him to determine if he told me that “Pat Dixon” was good looking. He did. It was an off-the-cuff remark. I had previously spoken to Investigator Frayeh about the Phil Spector matter - including “Devra Robaitaille” and other issues. I’ve been clear that Investigator Brian Bennett interviewed me and was in touch with me in the spring of 2005 - after, according to him, the District Attorney received a tip about Phil Spector and my friendship. And, of course, Investigator John Thompson told me I was probably a witness in Phil Spector’s matter. Fortunately, as Investigator Frayeh and I recently discussed, it was a blessing I wasn’t called to the stand. I was clear with everyone - including Steve Cron who met the detectives (as well) at Cohen’s house re. the Phil Spector good rock ‘n roll comments - that I did not want to be involved in that insanity in anyway whatsoever. Why? Because I did not witness Clarkson shoot herself. Phil Spector did.
That’s correct. I had dinner and drinks with Phillip after the Clarkson incident. At that time Phil Spector told me Clarkson was dancing around singing Da Doo Run Run in his foyer and shot herself. He also told me it was devastating to witness and I absolutely believed him. I think you’re clear that I worked for Mr. Spector, as his personal assistant, in 1988 and 1989. Other than that - these issues, at this time, are not public matters. I attended the Rock ‘n Roll Hall of Fame induction with Phillip when he was inducted. I know Janis and both children. I have been clear about this. I worked for Phillip after Marty Machat’s death. In fact, I believe Diane Ogden thought she worked for Phillip at the time I did. Phillip would have to address that however - and Janis Zavala Spector. I dont’ recall that she worked for him. I recall Devra Robaitaille.
I have not said anything about “the bastards” who destroyed my life. You have embellished my statements.
For the record, I do not believe I will be part of Phil Spector’s Appeal. I’m not Dennis Riordan but can’t imagine appealing an issue that hasn’t been raised in a trial. As you know, I was not raised in either trial as an issue. Stop lying Gianelli-Blogonaut. I also am completely uninterested in your opinions on legal issues. You are a liar. You have slandered me. You are engaged in cyber-terrorism and have attacked me and lied about me. You have lied to Agent Wynar/FBI about your views that I am spamming the Treasury - the Treasury has not taken this position and Agent Sopko has not advised me to stop copying her in on my emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff documenting the destruction of my life. Oh yes, a Deputy District Attorney in Orange County advised me that documenting all of this was an excellent idea - he wanted me to be absolutely clear that I didn’t know what the proper jurisdiction was. Jeff Jonas, Major Fraud Unit - Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, was convinced that Judge Louis Babcock - re. Greenberg/Cohen’s garbage suits in the U.S. District Court in Denver - did not have jurisdiction. I am convinced that Judge Ken Freeman not only didn’t have jurisdiction but may have entered a judgment without reviewing the corporate books and records and based on the perjured fraudulent allegation that I was a trustee. I was not a trustee and am aware that you continually avoid addressing issues having to do with Cohen, perjury, and the tax issues he and I have. You are, however, clear that the corporate books and indexes are filed publicly in Boulder Municipal Court. This was brought to Joff Belark’s attention in advance of his writing the lie disguised as an article and threatening me and possibly my son, sending Rutger’s email to the Boulder Police Department, etc. As I’ve said you and others are all over my story and it appears to be a well organized campaign of cyber-terrorism, harassment, etc.
For the record, I do not get “furious” with you Gianelli-Blogonaut. Don’t flatter yourself.
The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.
Actually, Gianelli-Blogonaut I think it’s fair to say that I was dragged into the Phil Spector matter. I opened my door and Investigator Brian Bennett was standing there with a badge. He and I continued to talk after that. My motive is not money. Were it - I would have accepted Cohen’s offer of 50% community property - presumably to lie to the IRS and say he was defrauded by his advisers. To assume otherwise is preposterous and nearly every person I have met has advised me that they would have taken the bribe.
Kelley Lynch
November 27th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
David Boies
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM
subject David Boies
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 10:10 AM (5 minutes ago)
David Boies,
Why did your firm advise me that I had a $25-50 million lawsuit with respect to the SWAT incident alone and that someone in the City of Los Angeles would take the fall for what happened to me? I - and other extremely intelligent attorneys I have spoken with - feel that my legal issues are egregious and deadly serious. Gianelli-Blogonaut, who has targeted me and “lied” to the FBI, etc. is attempting to prove that I’m imaging these things. I’m not imaging the fact that Norman Posel, a lawyer at the time for your firm, understood when he wrote the Complaint with Brownstein, Hyatt on behalf of Greenberg that it was clearly stated that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested. Posel also wrote me from your firm’s email address (and I have sent this to the Denver FBI) that Cohen and Kory were giong to destroy me and possibly destroy my children.
Would you like to address these issues as the cyber-terrorists are dead set on undermining my possibility as a potential “prominent government witness” with respect to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal. Do you think the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, FBI, DOJ, and Agent Sopko are copied in here because it’s a prank, David? How about you? You are a well respected attorney who represented Al Gore - are you copied in here for serious reasons? Gianelli-Blogonaut will probably want to speak on your behalf. He is speaking on behalf of Phil Spector’s current and present lawyers (or has) including Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan.
David, do you understand how Phillip can appeal an issue that wasn’t raised in court? Gianelli-Blogonaut seems to think that I feel you can and it makes me wonder if he even understands the word “appeal.”
Kelley Lynch
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
November 27th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
Robert MacMillan and Moses Znaimer
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:30 AM
subject Robert MacMillan and Moses Znaimer
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 10:30 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Robert and Moses,
How do you like the attacks on Rutger and threats being made with respect to him and evidence I provided the IRS? What I had in storage were copies of the corporate books and records. Cohen already has them. I insisted that DiMascio & Berardo return these to Cohen’s then lawyer at Greenberg, Glusker - who received, with a transmittal letter, copies of the Blue Mist and Traditional Holdings corporate books and records, and the original of LC Investments, LLC because I was not a partner or shareholder or owner but have received illegal K1s.
Thank you.
Love,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Ron Burkle
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:27 AM
subject Ron Burkle
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 10:27 AM (5 minutes ago)
Hello Ron,
How would you like “Kelly Green” making this public allegation about one of your children? This is not a deadly serious threat and extremely serious legal issue relating to the evidence I provided the IRS, right Ron? It is outrageous - particularly after what Rutger has witnessed and been through.
Do you think David Boies is copied in on my emails for frivolous reasons? You know Al Gore. Ask him if Mr. Boies is frivolous. Better yet - ask him why he didn’t fire Norman Posel and permitted an attorney with his firm to pretend he was in love with me in order to represent their client, Neal Greenberg. Yongzin Rinpoche was convinced that Norman Posel of Boies Schiller is a major obstacle in this issue (or was) and stood him up the weekend Greenberg alleges Cohen and Kory didn’t show up for what I was told would have been an illegal mediation - in Denver. In fact, Yongzin Rinpoche and Ray both witnessed my conversation - one evening - with Posel when he still worked for Boies Schiller. Ray probably doesn’t recall the details but I would imagine that Yongzin Rinpoche does.
You have probably noticed that the thugs who have targeted me and my children are attempting to demean great Tibetan lamas like the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 14th Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche. Sharmapa has been involved in approximately 65 lawsuits that I believe relate specifically to huge politics concerning India, China, Tibet, and other countries - such as Taiwan. He is involved in a situation that has led the Indian government to include that Situpa is a national security threat. He also was slandered and maligned by Mick Brown in a book and I found that shameless. Fortunately, Sharmapa (and others) have addressed Mick Brown’s lies and slander point by point, issue by issue, on karmapa-issue.org. Therefore, I’m assuming that Sharmapa - who I spoke to about this situation - understands the motive of the people who are attacking me and my children. I also assume he understands the “karma” or results of such activity.
Thank you, Mr. Burkle.
Love,
Kelley
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
November 27th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Rand Hoffman - Dr. Dre And Threats That Rutger Could Go To Prison Over IRS Evidence And Evidence Supporting Criminal Conduct
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand”
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:50 AM
subject Rand Hoffman - Dr. Dre And Threats That Rutger Could Go To Prison Over IRS Evidence And Evidence Supporting Criminal Conduct
Hello Rand,
As you know Steven Clark Lindsey dragged Ron Burkle, Moses Znaimer, Dr. Dre, Jonathan Silver, Mike Elizondo (who Cohen called - Cohen’s former accountant confirmed this for me - he was Mike Elizondo’s accountant), and others into Ray’s alleged custody matter that arose at the precise moment that I was being dragged to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector. What was Lindsey doing? He phoned Rutger and asked him to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen-Kory - while I was being questioned about Phil Spector. Rutger immediately phoned Douglas Penick. I am copying Van Penick, Rutger’s uncle and an attorney, in on this email because I want him to understand that Rutger has been threatened with potential prison - by people who seem to have motive to undermine me as a potential “prominent government witness” (an issue raised by someone on Phawker.com) and conceivably to derail/obstruct a potential federal criminal prosecution of Cohen relating to his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Other issues being discussed are the ways in which the Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen stories are intertwined with me essentially in the middle.
Why don’t you phone Dr. Dre and tell him that Lindsey has now exposed my son Rutger - who has been through an unconscionable ordeal and lost his fingers - to public threats of prison. Lindsey won’t care - he has destroyed Ray’s life. Dr. Dre knows Ray. Can he think of one reason why Ray should have been ripped from my life, why he was raised as an issue in the custody matter when I was being threatened, and why Robert Kory’s Declaration was submitted as evidence in that matter? Ray witnessed a conversation between me and Kory about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud (my advisers confirmed this for me), missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. You understand publishing and intellectual property, don’t you Rand? You are after all an attorney who works for Business Affairs at MCA Records and Aftermath Records. I own - and this is documented by corporate books, records, stock certificates, and notarized documents - 15% of all of Cohen’s intellectual property including book publishing. Cohen has now defrauded me of that. Do you have any idea why Lindsey would, after Ray witnessed my conversation with Robert Kory, submit Kory’s Declaration as evidence in a court of law. Kory did not know Ray.
In any event, Lindsey and Cohen have now exposed my children to absolutely viable threats. Would Dr. Dre stand by silently and permit that or is he intelligent enough to understand that there are deadly serious issues here - including the fact that I was told by Sergeant Joe - LAPD (who monitored my visit with Ray) that LAPD hid evidence (a car and possibly a gun) in the Biggie Smalls matter. Violetta Wallace’s lawyer, Bradley Gage, did not appear to take this lightly. Ron Burkle is copied in here as well. He is a partner in a business with Sean Combs. Dr. Dre knows P. Diddy doesn’t he? Do you think P. Diddy would take that information lightly? How about being set up by a District Attorney of Los Angeles? Do you think any of these men think there are any corrupt government officials and/or corrupt cops in Los Angeles? I know there are.
All the best,
Kelley
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
November 27th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello Leon,
My son Rutger is now being threatened with prison. What’s the issue, Leon? Evidence that relates to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud I was told is criminal and which I have provided the IRS. Why would this cause someone to threaten Rutger with prison? Take a look at the insanity going on with Gianelli-Blogonaut, Kelly Green, Sydney, and others at Phawker.com. They are all over Cohen’s tax fraud matter, the Phil Spector story, and absolutely seem dead set on undermining me and Rutger as witnesses and probably derailing and/or obstructing a pending or possible federal criminal prosecution. I guess the stakes are high, Leon. Cohen has now exposed Rutger to threats of prison and his lawyer, Robert Kory, has a Declaration in Ray’s custody matter. See anything ethical about that, Leon? You knew me rather well and you Cohen - any thoughts on why he would destroy my life and target my children? This is who he is Leon. He also targeted Phil Spector. He is a vicioous, malicious fraud and calculated liar. Ray witnessed a conversation between me and Robert Kory (as I have advised you previously and probably raised in my voicemail messages to you at The New Republic) with respect to Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that Cohen stole (that’s amazing, no, Leon? - there are corporate books, records, stock certificates proving this - there aren’t any proving I owned any share of LC Investments, LLC so the K1s are “illegal”), and their threats.
This is one hell of an evil folksinger. And who has motive to keep him credible? According to Mick Brown/UK Telegraph Cohen testified against Phil Spector in his grand jury. Cohen is raised in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine. Obviously there’s a way to determine if Cohen actually did testify against Phillip and changed what he told the detectives Steve Cron and I met at his house - that his comments about Phil Spector, over the years, were good rock ‘n roll comments. You know how close Cohen and I were. Don’t you think I would have heard, from him, something about Phillip holding a gun on him? I never once did. I heard that he hated his vocals and I heard that he was humiliated having to telegram Phil Spector to beg him to complete the production on the album. There were musicians at the studio for those recordings. Hal Blaine, who has stated that he never once saw Phil Spector in the studio with a gun fin the 37 years he worked for him - so obviously wasn’t called as a “prosecution witness,” was there.
In any event, Leon, take a look at what the crowd defending Cohen has to say about me and my children. And keep this in mind - Cohen personally flew into Boulder after his lawyer threatened Ann Diamond who was writing a letter for Rolling Stone about my version of events. The fact that Diamond was addressing Freda Guttman’s allegation that Lorca Cohen told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her probably figured in, don’t you think Leon? Van Penick knows this story. I discussed this with him - I also discussed the fact that Cohen was concerned about statutes of limitations relating to his sexual relations with his 15-year old nanny, his residence/tax issues in Canada (apparently no good news), and the fact that he wanted a U.S. tax credit for the donation of his body of work to the University of Toronto. I can assure you that I didn’t want that Leon and his own lawyer, Reeve Chudd, wrote me that he was not an alchemist. His disdain for ordinary income taxes and gift taxes and the lengths he went to avoid paying taxes was and remains unprecedented in my mind. Greed got the best of him. And now my children are being targeted and I am being absolutely trashed.
I trust you’re well and enjoying your family. Unfortunately, I am not - they are being threatened and maligned publicly and it absolutely relates to Cohen’s tax fraud and Phil Spector’s set up. You’re qutie brilliant, Leon - why do you think five major forensic scientists concluded that Clarkson shot herself? You also understand the news media so you are clear about why the de rigeur gun stories are how they decided to spin this. That apparently does not apply to Linda Deutsch. Paul Huebl’s site is also quite fascinating and alleges that Clarkson’s family’s lawyer witness tampered. Lots and lots of criminal conduct is being raised as potential issues. You understand that they are deadly serious legal matters, Leon, and you also probably understand that i will not be an issue in an appeal because I wasn’t raised on the record. I understand that. The maniac, Gianelli-Blogonaut, who has targeted me, lied about me, been in touch with Cohen’s advisers, lied to the FBI, contacted an investigator on Phil Spector’s matter, and has motive apparently to undermine me, thinks that’s an issue. I think he should be investigated and prosecuted for reasons I have clearly stated.
Please see Kelly Green’s comments about Rutger in prison vis a vis evidence and the IRS and Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud matter. I won’t be addressing them with Gianelli-Blogonaut who appears to be attempting to explain them away or lie - as usual. Leonard Cohen is desperate and this site (Phawker) is evidence of true desperation and criminal conduct. These are my unshakable personal opinions. I did not steal documents from Cohen, Leon. I stored them for nearly 20 years - boxes and boxes that I dragged with me from Los Angeles. Douglas Penick is also aware of this and Steven Machat has already stated this is an email that I have provided the IRS and others.
As you well know, Leon, I am not crazy. These people are, however, vicious and maliciuos - that includes, from my perspective, Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson. Take a look at Diane Ogden’s son’s public post that I stumbled upon last night. I think the DEA should investigate this and I think Immigration should investigate matters re. DeSouza’s perjury in Immigration documents and Cohen’s abandoned and then re-obtained green cards. Maybe these thugs can continue to threaten and insult federal agents - and lie to them. Why would Gianelli-Blogonaut call the FBI about my communications with Agent Sopko/Treasury. He had her email and even contacted her. It’s obvious, Leon. You’re in Washington, Leon, and understand politics - do you think the DEA should investigate two suicides in connection with the Phil Spector murder trial set up or do you think they only investigate what happened to Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith and Heath Ledger?
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-213989
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
sean ogden said
July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU
November 27th, 2009 at 3:18 pm
Garrison Courtney - DEA
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:17 AM
subject Garrison Courtney - DEA
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:17 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Mr. Courtney,
Why don’t you take a look at the threats regarding my son, prison, and evidence provided the IRS re. Cohen’s tax fraud and then take a look at the heartbreaking post of Sean Ogden’s/ You don’t think people’s lives have been devastated by this absolutely malicious situation, do you? It’s a game for Gianelli-Blogonaut, et al. They are merely attempting, from my perspective, to derail any potential federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen, appear to be meddling in Phil Spector’s legal issues, and witness tampering - obviously. Also, do you think threatening Rutger with prison is a threat and/or witness intimidation? I do. Careful, Agent Sopko is already been called my “pet” agent by Gianelli-Blogonaut who also lied to Agent Wynar/FBI. I have been advised by Marco/LA District Attorney’s own investigator, to tell the Denver FBI “Merry Christmas” and at that moment in time realized I was dealing with true thugs and criminals. Rockaway Police apparently also figured out - very very quckly - that Marco threatened me and it was criminal. They told me to come in and file a criminal complaint against him. I was in New Jersey at the time and as an FBI Duty Agent pointed out - this is taking place all across the country. It is outlandish and outrageous.
All the best,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Attorney General - State of Kentucky
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)”
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:20 AM
subject Attorney General - State of Kentucky
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:20 AM (0 minutes ago)
To the Attorney General - State of Kentucky,
Any thoughts on why my son Rutger has been threatened with prison re. evidence I provided the IRS in connection with Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told and know is criminal. Mr. Rob Watts/Fraud asked me to send him everything I sent the IRS. Apparently “Kelly Green” on Phawker’s Blog has some information that Rutger could actually go to prison here.
I am waiting for the Opinion Letter I have requested from the State of Kentucky and assume the State of Kentucky understands that I was not a trustee for Cohen and did not own a percentage of LC Investments, LLC. So why did Cohen illegally issue K1s in Kentucky and then, actually, directly to the IRS bypassing me. I wasn’t hard to find. His own fraudulent perjured Declaration in Boulder proves that he is intensely monitoring my activities.
All the best,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Paul Huebl
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to “*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)”
cc doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com
date Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:22 AM
subject Paul Huebl
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:22 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hi Paul,
Rutger has now been threatened with prison by Kelly Green. Gianelli-Blogonaut is attempting to address that issue but I want the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko to address all of these threats, etc. Kelly Green has stated, publicly, that I stole your copyrights re. your articles on Phil Spector and/or took credit for them. I did not and would like to hear from you personally on that matter and I would like you to confirm that “Kelly Green” speaks for and/or represents you.
Thank you.
All the best,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
We have opened up a new discussion thread here:
http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/11/kelley-lynchphil-spector-friend-or.html
November 27th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
Teresa Low - Attorney General of California’s Office Reply |Kelley Lynch to commissioner, STEPHEN, Blogonaut, ASKDOJ, washington.fie., Kelly.Sopko, Jewel, Thaye, ajackson, rbyucaipa, Robert, Lee, moseszzz, smith, Duane, Mick, dboies, Governor.ritter, general, attorney.gener., stan.garnett, gordonj, becknerm, Larry, John, lwieseltier
show details 11:59 AM (0 minutes ago)
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Teresa Low ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
PIU ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
“Edelman, Scott A.” ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,
governor@governor.ca.gov
ccdoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com
dateFri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:59 AM
subjectTeresa Low - Attorney General of California’s Office
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 11:59 AM (0 minutes ago)
Ms. Low,
Any thoughts on why Kelly Green has raised prison as a possibility with respect to my son Rutger and evidence I have provided the IRS? How about any evidence I may come across? Do you think Judge Ken Freeman - who obviously wilfully overlooked corporate books, records, stock certificates, and the ‘fact” that I was not and never will be a trustee on these entities - can order me to obstruct a potential criminal federal prosecution of Cohen by demanding that I hand over evidence that could potentially be destroyed by Cohen and/or his advisers? Well, that’s precisely what I think Freeman did. Edelman knows I wasn’t served Cohen’s lawsuit - as does Kory. Edelman told me that what happened to me is unfortunate. Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s own former accountant, told me what happened to me was unconscionable and questioned what Court on earth would give Lindsey custody of my son - with Kory’s Declaration filed in that matter. You work with law enforcement, right Ms. Low? See any problems with that? I did discuss this with the Treasury agents I met - including the woman Gianelli-Blogonaut is now referring to as my “pet” federal agent. I can assure you that Agent Sopko is not my pet. She didn’t appear to be anyone’s pet from what I can tell but this was meant to disparage Agent Sopko. I guess Gianelli-Blogonaut had to drag Agent Wynar/FBI into this because he couldn’t get Agent Sopko to tell him anything about a pending and/or possible federal criminal prosecution relating to Leonard Cohen or even (perhaps) a possible investigation into Phil Spector’s matter by the federal government. You do see the DOJ, FBI, IRS, Treasury, DEA, and Immigration copied in here, don’t? Gianelli-Blogonaut and others have publicly confirmed that they do. Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut would target me, target - with Joff Belark - my son Rutger, attempt to involve LAPD, Boulder PD, contact Agent Sopko-Treasury, lie to Agent Wynar-FBI, demean and insult Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan, speak for Bruce Cutler, and publicly state that there is no IRS matter relating to Cohen pending. I personally believe this goes to motive.
Now my son is being threatened with prison and I read a devasting post by Sean Ogden - Diane Ogden’s son and he mentions this “fucking trial” which, no doubt, relates to the Phil Spector set up. I have suggested, to Garrison Courtney/DEA that he speak directly with Sean Ogden about his public comments relating to his mother and her death and this “fucking trial” Mr. Courtney is also copied in here and should not that “the feds” are under attack here also but the DEA deals with the Colombians, drug cartels, and other thugs and probably knows - better than anyone - how to handle criminal thugs parading as “government officials and corrupt law enforcement” - including, perhaps LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit. The DEA is working with Robbery-Homicide on the Michael Jackson investigation. Do you think they are curious to know why Bill Pavelic has alleged publicly that Robbery-Homicide set up him, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden in retaliation for another Hollywood celebrity murder trial - OJ? I would want to know if I were the head of the DEA and/or an agent working with them. To assume othewise is preposterous. Of course, Gianelli-Blogonaut, et al. have determined that “the feds” are idiots and pets to be toyed with, baited, insulted, lied to, and possibly lied about. Why would agencies like the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, DEA, Immigratoin, etc., want to be willfully undermined? Can you think of a good reason? Can you think of a good reason for their being copied in on these emails? I can and have made this very public - because my life was destroyed after reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I have been told is criminal and there is a well organized campaign of harassment, cyber-terrorism, etc. that appears to be an attempt to undermine my credibility as a witness. Gianelli-Blogonaut is attempting to argue that I actually think I will be raised in Phil Spector’s appeal. I won’t. I wasn’t raised on the record so there is obviously nothing to appeal. He must think that everyone witnessing this situation is a complete idiot and totally out to lunch.
Why did a Duty Agent with the FBI in Denver tell me to let the IRS take the lead here and they would be brought in if there is criminal evidence and/or witness tampering? - which there is and that includes threatening my son with prison over evidence that is crucial to a potential federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen.
For the record, I do not care if Steve Cooley is a locally elected official as you and I discussed. I think he is corrupt. I think he personally is responsible for the Phil Spector set up and I think Alan Jackson, Truc Do, Pat Dixon (who I do not fantasize about but who may fear for his life about me because I quoted Eminem’s “Puke” and these are madmen and monsters), Doug Sortino, Larry Fidler, the Sheriff’s Department, Alhambra PD, LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit, the coroner, and others should be investigated and Steve Cooley should take the fall. I wonder who Boies Schiller thought was going to take the fall in Los Angeles and why? Probably because I sent Norman Posel (an attorney with Boies Schiller) transcript of my conversation with Janis Zavala Spector where we obviously concluded that the District Attorney and witneses (whom we know) were lying.
Take a look at the threat against Rutger and Sean Ogden’s post about his mother and then tell me why the federal government shouldn’t step in and prosecute this matter as it relates to civil rights violations and criminal conduct that, as a Duty Agent with the FBI noted, is taking place all across this country.
David Boies’ office received three huge boxes of evidence. I would assume they have copies. Do you think he’ll be threatened with prison also?
Kelley Lynch
P.S. The SEC is also copied in - Robert Kory raised very very serious issues relating to Neal Greenberg and the SEC. I reported them. I have no bonds or loyalty to a bunch of criminals and my goal here is justice - using the legal system that has failed Phil Spector and permitted Cohen and Lindsey to get away with what I view as criminal conduct including, but not limited to, perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness retaliation, witness harassment, coercion, blackmail, collusion, intentional torts, etc.
P.P.S. The Houston FBI is copied in because Gianelli-Blogonaut was monitoring my actions in Houston - but then determined, falsely, that I had moved or “fled” to Mexico and stated that publicly.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
sean ogden said
July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU
November 27th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
Google’s Legal Team - Gianelli-Blogonaut New Blog Post
InboxX
Reply |Kelley Lynch to commissioner, STEPHEN, Blogonaut, ASKDOJ, washington.fie., Kelly.Sopko, Jewel, Thaye, ajackson, rbyucaipa, Robert, Lee, moseszzz, smith, Duane, Mick, dboies, Governor.ritter, general, attorney.gener., stan.garnett, gordonj, becknerm, Larry, John, lwieseltier
show details 12:10 PM (4 minutes ago)
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Teresa Low ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
PIU ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
“Edelman, Scott A.” ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,
governor@governor.ca.gov
ccdoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com,
legal-support@google.com
dateFri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:10 PM
subjectGoogle’s Legal Team - Gianelli-Blogonaut New Blog Post
mailed-bygmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 12:10 PM (5 minutes ago)
To Google’s Legal Team,
I have supplied you with ample evidence that my email accounts and Blogs have been targeted by cyber-terrorists attempting to derail a possible federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen and possible investigation into whether or not Phil Spector was set up. This is my opinion.
For the record, I deleted my philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com Blog. This is the first lie I’ve noted on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest attempt to undermine me as a potential prominent government witness. They have threatened my son with prison and the tactics are vicious. You have the ability to determine who is the liar in this situation and the allegation about this Blog should tell you that Gianelli-Blogonaut is a liar who is being copied in on this email, with federal agencies, Phil Spector’s legal team, and others due to the fact that he is clearly part of a well-organized campaign to undermine me and silence me - this extends to Boulder PD and the FBI in Denver advised me that the Boulder DA and/or Attorney General of Colorado should investigate why Boulder PD came into my office based on fraudulent allegations that I believe may relate to my conversation with “Officer Garrin” of LAPD in connection with a conversation we had about “Officer Maurice Hampton” who was the “officer” that drove me to Killer King while Erma Oppenhein questioned me about Phil Spector.
All the best,
Kelley
About two or three months before the end of the second Spector murder trial Kelley Lynch launched her first blog that she entitled “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch”, a site that assumed that Spector would be acquitted and then Phil Spector would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team to JOIN Lynch in suing her imagined enemies, including the LAPD, and in suing Cohen. (The site has since been removed by Google.)
KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?
Opinion—By Blogonaut
It turns out Kelley Lynch is a Johnny-come-lately Phil Spector “supporter”, who may be more motivated by money than friendship. Or is she?
Although the Leonard Cohen nemesis claims that she is a “dear friend” of the music producer, doubts remain.
Phil Spector’s close friends (and even some fans) attended at least one of Spector’s trial sessions as a show of support. Kelley Lynch never showed up once for any of the pretrial proceedings or any of the trial days for the two nine month trials—even though the Spectors were urging fans and friends to drop by and show their support on their website. Nor has Lynch been to visit her “dear friend” in prison since his conviction on murder charges earlier this year.
About two or three months before the end of the second Spector murder trial Kelley Lynch launched her first blog that she entitled “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch”, a site that assumed that Spector would be acquitted and then Phil Spector would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team to JOIN Lynch in suing her imagined enemies, including the LAPD, and in suing Cohen. (The site has since been removed by Google.)
Kelley Lynch has tried to make a case that her legal woes and Phil Spector’s legal problems were intertwined.
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
Of course, Leonard Cohen never testified against Phil Spector, and Phil Spector’s legal team never raised any claim that there was perjured testimony before the grand jury that indicted the music producer in the trial court—thus waiving that as a legal issue (if it ever was one).
It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.
But, of course, it is fantasy constructed on the thinnest of foundations, because there never was any “linkage” between Kelley Lynch’s legal troubles and those of the music producer—except that Lynch and Spector knew each other (it is not clear how well) years ago, and (she claims) dined together (in addition to how many others she has not said) after Clarkson’s death.
That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).
The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
In other words, Lynch (at least in our view) has her hand out plain and simple.
That core motivation, in our opinion, is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.
BTW, some of you may notice that we have not posted on this subject in some time, but with over 100 emails in our inbox (several within the hour) from Kelley Lynch disparaging this blog and demanding our attorney’s “disbarment”, “arrest” and “prosecution” for daring to disagree with Kelley Lynch’s far out views—all cc’d to the IRS, Treasury agent Sopko, the Department of Justice, the Governor of Colorado and many others—we decided it is once again time to join the internet discussion about Ms. Lynch raging on other sites.
We welcome your views in the comments.
Posted by Blogonaut at 11:28 AM
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
P.S. Boulder Police Department definitely needs to be investigated:
November 27th, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Good for Blogonaut, they have finally had enough.
They have my full support and respect.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Teresa Low ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
PIU ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
“Edelman, Scott A.” ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,
governor@governor.ca.gov
ccdoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com,
legal-support@google.com
dateFri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:28 PM
subjectRe: Bill Pavelic - My friendship with Phil Spector and Kelly Green’s Threat Re. Rutger & Prison
mailed-bygmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 12:28 PM (0 minutes ago)
P.S. I don’t have the money to visit Phillip in prison in California. I also didn’t go to Mexico - as Gianelli-Blogonaut publicly noted on Phawker.com. I am, however, sending Phillip copies of Phawker’s Blog, Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Blog, and my letter to Alan Jackson. Isn’t it amazing, Bill, that I was accused of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon - a man that I am convinced help set up Phil Spector. He apparently, according to what Gianelli-Blogonaut publicly posted, fears for his life because I quoted Eminem’s “Puke” and said that it reminds me of Dixon. Eminem dedicated the song to Mariah Carey and he, not I, references “dry humping.” Did you catch Fidler’s comment about what he may or may not wear under his robes? For the record, you are not my investigator and I do not want to hire you as my investigator. Any thoughts on why “Alan Jackson” was in touch with Gianelli-Blogonaut and why Gianelli-Blogonaut contacted Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson? Now to assume that Phil Spector doesn’t want to know about these incidents is absolutely insane.
- Hide quoted text -
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello Bill Pavelic,
Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut is questioning my friendship with Phil Spector - publicly? You don’t think it has anything to do with this comment on his latest Blog posting - meant to undermine me as a potential prominent witness for the federal government, do you?
“Kelley Lynch has tried to make a case that her legal woes and Phil Spector’s legal problems were intertwined.”
Do you think, knowing Phillip, that he is going to support the conclusions Gianelli-Blogonaut has now made public and/or the allegations?
Why do you think Rutger’s being threatened with prison, Bill? Any thoughts there? Do you think Phillip would take that seriously - after all, Rutger lost his fingers the same day (a few years apart) that Clarkson shot herself at his house and our karma is clearly intertwined - including with respect to Marty Machat, my friendships with his family, and the fact that Mick Brown slandered and lied about Phillip as well as the Karmapa, Sharmapa, and others - who are all copied in here and were maligned on Blaine’s vile Blog. Blaine publicly thanked Blogonaut for helping her target my email accounts and Blogs, Bill.
Do you think the DEA, working alongside LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit on the Michael Jackson matter (something Ron Burkle has karmic connections to because Michael Jackson publicly stated that Ron Burkle saved his life) based on your public allegations that LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set up you, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden in retaliation for the OJ matter. If I were a DEA agent (or the Director of the DEA) I would be paying very very close attention to those remarks because my agents or I would be working alongside LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide on a “high profile celebrity murder trial.”
This situation, especially with respect to Rutger, is vicious, malicious, and nasty. Why do you, Bill, think LAPD, Inglewood PD, Santa Monica PD, Boulder PD, and possibly others are all over my story and do you understand why I contacted the DOJ and FBI? Do you understand why Gianelli-Blogonaut (who is using your email to him to undermine me publicly, I might note) lied to Agent Wynar/FBI about the fact that I am “spamming” the Treasury - specifically Agent Sopko? I am not and she has never advised me that I am. Nor has she advised me not to contact her. She advised me to take my allegations of criminal tax fraud re. Leonard Cohen to Agent Tejeda/IRS Fraud Los Angeles. Was that innocent on her part? She’s Intelligence at the Treasury. Did the Treasury waste government resources to fly Agent Sopko into California to meet with me as part of a federal prank?
Kelley Lynch
Although the Leonard Cohen nemesis claims that she is a “dear friend” of the music producer, doubts remain.
Phil Spector’s close friends (and even some fans) attended at least one of Spector’s trial sessions as a show of support. Kelley Lynch never showed up once for any of the pretrial proceedings or any of the trial days for the two nine month trials—even though the Spectors were urging fans and friends to drop by and show their support on their website. Nor has Lynch been to visit her “dear friend” in prison since his conviction on murder charges earlier this year.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS and FBI,
I left Dale Burgess phone number with Agent Tejeda/IRS and Agent Wynar/FBI. Dale Burgess asked me to confirm for the IRS and Treasury Department that he would take the stand and testify that Cohen - via Kory - offered me 50% community property and he is the one that personaly told me (in front of DiMascio & Berardo) that Kory also offered me $10,000/month walking aroud money. His number, for the records, is 415-777-0601. Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly questioned whether my motive is money. An IRS “reward” or whistle-blower “reward” has also been raised as an issue - as I mentioned to Agent Sopko and her partner in our meeting. I have no interest, whatsoever, in bribes or rewards. I am interested in justice and justice is my motivating factor. Gianelli-Blogonaut is now desperate - as are others. This is clear, to me, from the latest round of posts on Phawker.com that specifically relate to Phil Spector’s matters, Cohen’s matters, evidence and a threat of Rutger going to prison possibly.
All the best,
Kelley
KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?
November 27th, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Mick Brown - Your Email To Me Advising Me That Cohen Testified Against Phillip In His Grand Jury
InboxX
Reply |Kelley Lynch to commissioner, STEPHEN, Blogonaut, ASKDOJ, washington.fie., Kelly.Sopko, Jewel, Thaye, ajackson, rbyucaipa, Robert, Lee, moseszzz, smith, Duane, Mick, dboies, Governor.ritter, general, attorney.gener., stan.garnett, gordonj, becknerm, Larry, John, lwieseltier
show details 12:43 PM (0 minutes ago)
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Teresa Low ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
PIU ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
“Edelman, Scott A.” ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
harriet.ryan@latimes.com,
“Lauter, David”
ccdoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com,
legal-support@google.com
dateFri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:43 PM
subjectMick Brown - Your Email To Me Advising Me That Cohen Testified Against Phillip In His Grand Jury
mailed-bygmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 12:43 PM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Mick,
I am now under attack because you advised me that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury. You advised me that you received a package with the grand jury testimony - including Cohen’s. Why would you lie to me about this? And you followed up and told me who the person was that sent it to you, if you will recall. I worked with Leonard Cohen for approximately 20 years. He never once told me that Phil Spector held a gun on him. That’s quite odd, Mick, since we discussed everything - including the fact (as he publicly stated in Stephen Holden’s interview for Rolling Stone) that he hated his vocals and, as he told me, because he was humiliated that he had to telegram Phillip in order to basically beg him to complete the production. As you noted in your book, without properly citing me as the source (which raises similar issues as Sharmapa has with you in your utterly disgraceful book on the deadly serious politics involving the Kagyu lineage and the politics of India, China, and Tibet - to name a few … I assume you’ve heard that Situ is now considered a national security threat by the Indian government … the “kasung”/guards with the other 17th Karmapa advised me that the State Department was along for the visit - seems fairly heavy to me, Mick), Phillip received hate mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fan and found working with Cohen depressing.
Cohen is also raised as an “example” of a prior bad act, if you see where I’m going Mick, in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine in the Phil Spector matter. Why wasn’t he called to the witness stand to testify against Phillip?
King Drew was a facility that the federal government stepped in and shut down. That’s why it was referred to, primarily by the African American community, as Killer King - because people in South Central understand that you go there to “die.” The District Attorney’s office understands this and that may be why Charles Ornstein/LA Times published the District Attorney’s Confidential Internal Memo, that mentions Jeff Jonas (who I spoke to in Major Fraud), and the fact that Luis Pena - the coroner, is not a credible witness but may lie to keep his job and because he understands the “political” ramificatoins . The memo specifically addresses a death or deaths at Killer King. I was taken there, questioned about Phil Spector en route, and the entire file is falsified. Now do you really believe that Phil Spector won’t address that issue legally, Mick? If so, you don’t know the Phil Spector who I know extremely well. In fact, Janis Zavala Spector told me that 1) she had never seen Phillip with guns (a hell of a comment after approximately 40 years but supports Hal Blaine’s position that he never saw Phillip, in the studio, with guns over a 37 year period; and, 2) I know Phillip better than she does. She also told me that someone, a witness, lied about scheduling the bowling party. Diane Ogden seems to have thought she worked for Phillip in 1988 and 1989 - when I did. His phones were transferred to my house all day long and I spoke to him and Janis frequently. I believe I scheduled an evening date or something like that with Ogden but do not believe she was his personal assistant. Take a look at Sean Ogden’s public posting below. As a Mother - I find it horrifying. What “fucking trial” do you think he’s talking about?
I think there are two suicides here, Mick. Five major forensic scientists testified or stated that Clarkson shot herself. That is precisely what Phillip told me after we had dinner after the Clarkson incident - that Clarkson, a 6′ tall woman who weighed 160 pounds, was dancing around his foyer with a gun. He told me that witnessing her shoot herself was devastating and he told me in no uncertain terms that it was horrendous to be tasered. Therefore, I know that the DA, others, and - in particular, “Pat Dixon” are and will remain liars.
Gianelli-Blogonaut is now attempting to further undermine me as a potential prominent government witness. Why not? He’s already lied to FBI Agent Wynar, communicated with Cohen’s advisers, contacted Investigator Frayeh, and obviously has motive.
I think you should have held off on writing your book about Phillip until after everything - including the appeals - were concluded. It would have made a better read and Phillip probably would have given you the definitive interview. I also happen to believe, karmically, that you should write a new book addressing - honestly - the Karmapa issue with interviews by the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, and Lama Karma Wangchuk. That will, Mick, address the extremely negative karmic issues you have caused for yourself by lying and slandering people. Take my advice, Mick. It won’t kill you.
Kelley
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?
November 27th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Investigator William Frayeh
InboxX
Reply |Kelley Lynch to commissioner, STEPHEN, Blogonaut, ASKDOJ, washington.fie., Kelly.Sopko, Jewel, Thaye, ajackson, rbyucaipa, Robert, Lee, moseszzz, smith, Duane, Mick, dboies, Governor.ritter, general, attorney.gener., stan.garnett, gordonj, becknerm, Larry, John, lwieseltier
show details 1:01 PM (0 minutes ago)
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Teresa Low ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
PIU ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
“Edelman, Scott A.” ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
harriet.ryan@latimes.com,
“Lauter, David” ,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
David Moorhead
ccdoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com,
legal-support@google.com
dateFri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM
subjectInvestigator William Frayeh
mailed-bygmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 1:01 PM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Investigator Frayeh,
I would call Rutger’s being threatened with prison a deadly serious issue. Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut (whom you spoke with about your comments regarding Pat Dixon and who lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and is clearly witness tampering with someone he realizes may be a prominent goverment witness potentially in pending federal matter). Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut accused me of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon - a man I do not know and never want to meet. Eminem’s “Puke” sums up precisely how I feel about Pat Dixon. Gianelli-Blogonaut also publicly posted on his Blog that Pat Dixon fears for his life based on the fact that I quoted Eminem’s “Puke.” It is Eminem - not I - who refers to “dry humping” as I pointed out to Gianelli-Blogonaut. I realize you didn’t think Gianelli-Blogonaut read minds when it wrote me about Alan Jackson’s email to me and confirmed that it had received some type of communication from Alan Jackson. I agree - Gianelli-Blogonaut found a sympathetic ear in Alan Jackson and I want to know what Jackson’s connection is to this slander, gossip, attempts to undermine me, and now the threat that Rutger could go to prison.
Did you see Sean Ogden’s post about his mother in her final days, a slow poisoning, and the “fucking trial.” I think the DEA should speak to him and I think that post is devastatingly heartbroken and evidence that children and others have been destroyed through this shameless matter. I can assure you that if I worked for the DEA and read Bill Pavelic’s allegations that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Ogden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery Homicide Unit in retliation for OJ I would take them deadly seroius. Why? Because the DEA is working with LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit on the Michael Jackson homicide. Check out what Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated my angle is. Sounds right to me. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and the entire file is falsified. Rutger, simultaneously, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen and/or Kory (who has a Declaration in Ray’s so called custody matter that John Barry, a renowned songwriter and musician who understood that something was seriously wrong with the Phil Spector matter early on and has seen him in the studio also, explained to Rutger was a “kidnapping.” John Barry is probably one of the most brilliant men I have ever met. He also told me that LAPD might attempt to murder me if I publicly testified. I wonder why he and so many others think I am a potential witness, Bill? You must be aware, knowing John Thompson and Brian Bennett, that I was dragged into Phil Spector’s insanity and was told point blank that I was a probable witness in the Phil Spector matter. I do not believe I will be raised in an appeal since I wasn’t involved with the trials and, fortunately, did not witness the vicious, malicious assaults on Mr. Spector’s character in the court room - something Gianelli-Blogonaut thinks proves something between me and Phil Spector. Do you think he knows what Phil Spector thinks or feels about me? Phil Spector has known Rutger since he was an infant. He and Janis gave me many many items that belonged to Nicole and Phillip, Jr. for Rutger. My sister’s daughter was given the books that belonged to Nicole and Phillip, Jr. Our connection goes way back. When Phillip “picked me up” (Brian Bennett stated in his report I reviewed with Dale Kelly, who I believe is Bruce Cutler’s investigator that I met with and reviewed that report with) and clearly didn’t think any of this was a game, he met Rutger and shook hands with him. He was proud of Rutger and delighted to note that he is a wonderful young man. He is now under serious attack and has lost the fingers on the hand that he told David Moorhead he recalled shaking. David Moorhead, an attorney who is copied in here, thought Rutger might be a “material witness” for Phil Spector. And now he is being threatened - including with “prison.” David Moorhead concluded that the District Attorney of Los Angeles had the power and motive to drag me to Killer King (and question me about Phil Spector) unless the cops acted on their own which I tend to doubt. He also felt that Robert Kory was behind Boulder PD rolling into Deneuve Construction in an attempt to intimidate me. The Denver FBI Duty Agent I spoke to didn’t think LAPD was behind that incident but I believe they were involved.
Thanks for confirming that you don’t think this is a federal prank. I think it’s a nightmare and I think there is a tremendous amount of criminal and unconscionable activity taking place in front of my very eyes.
All the best,
Kelley
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?
November 27th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff
InboxX
Reply |Kelley Lynch to commissioner, STEPHEN, Blogonaut, ASKDOJ, washington.fie., Kelly.Sopko, Jewel, Thaye, ajackson, rbyucaipa, Robert, Lee, moseszzz, smith, Duane, Mick, dboies, Governor.ritter, general, attorney.gener., stan.garnett, gordonj, becknerm, Larry, John, lwieseltier
show details 1:07 PM (0 minutes ago)
fromKelley Lynch
to”*irs. commissioner” ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
ASKDOJ ,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Jewel of Activity ,
Thaye Dorje ,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
“Lee K. Alpert” ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
“attorney. general” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
Joff Belark ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
“U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” ,
“Webmaster, USCIS” ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
mayor@lacity.org,
“Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Teresa Low ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
PIU ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
“Edelman, Scott A.” ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
harriet.ryan@latimes.com,
“Lauter, David” ,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
David Moorhead
ccdoronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
karen@mccourt.org,
david@mccourt.org,
van.penick@mcinnescooper.com,
legal-support@google.com
dateFri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:07 PM
subjectTo the IRS Commissioner’s Staff
mailed-bygmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 1:07 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commisisoner’s Staff,
How would Gianelli-Blogonaut (who is copied in here so that it cannot later deny anything) know what does or does not give me false hope? I have asked Phil Spector to join me in a lawsuit against the Los Angeles District Attorney and others. Period. Why is “sue the bastards” in quotes? I have never uttered or written that statement and it is an indication, to me, that I’m dealing with an arrogant fop in Gianelli-Blogonaut who lied to Agent Wynar/FBI, contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury, contacted Investigator Frayeh on Phillip’s matter, and is clear that I am possibly a potential prominent government witness in a pending or possible/probable federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen. Investigator Frayeh did not think this was a federal prank. Investigator Brian Bennett understood that my “matters” are federal. So does Gianelli-Blogonaut, apparently, or he wouldn’t be lying to and insulting federal agents and obviously attempting to derail a federal prosecution that may be pending. He also wouldn’t know if it’s pending and that’s why I think he contacted Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko. How would Gianelli-Blogonaut, who does not know me, know who I want to represent me or what criminal attorney I have consulted? He wouldn’t. He’s a stranger with motive who has communicated with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson.
All the best,
Kelley
It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.
November 27th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject:
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, ” Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, ” Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:16 PM
P.S. One or two police officers confirmed for Rutger that they intended to shoot me and the dog on May 25, 2005. That means I could have been murdered and goes to motive, from what I can tell - no? They were armed. Rutger was in front of them being used as a hostage negotiator and human shield which I assume illegal and goes against the rules of the Geneva Convention. The conclusion of many many people is that I was going to be shot and drugs possibly were going to be planted on me. My theory - the teenagers disrupted the cops who realized their were “witnesses” - including those that “witnesed” Lindsey lying to the SWAT team. LAPD/Inglewood PD must have realized this also because they illegally entered my house and the guest house and realized there was no “hostage.” This story frightens people about government and law enforcement but this is a high stakes game that Gianelli-Blogonaut and others are playing. I want Boulder PD investigated because Gianelli-Blogonaut is dead set on undermining me using them, they are all over this story, I called Phil Spector immediately after Officer Storbeck and the Police Chief’s Secretary left, it crosses state borders, and probably relates to my communications with LAPD and/or SMART - including “Officer Garrin.” I don’t know why David Moorhead, who told me he is not concerned about testifying in a high profile matter and told Rutger he could be a “material witness” for Phil Spector (now being threatened with prison by “Kelly Green” who did not like Sean Ogden’s public remarks about his mother and the “fucking trial”), felt Kory was behind Boulder PD’s roll-by Deneuve Construction. The IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team should ask him. He’s a very brilliant and wonderful man and an excellent attorney.
“t is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.”
November 27th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Correcting Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Latest Round Of Lies And Attempts To Slander And Undermine Me - Including Using Boulder PD’S “tactics”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:24 PM
P.S. I don’t get furious when Gianelli-Blogonaut insists that Phil Spector’s appeal will contain any references to me whatsoever. He is lying. Why would I be raised on appeal when I am not in any legal court record relating to Phil Spector’s legal matters? That is preposterous and there would be nothing to appeal. My fax to Judge Larry Fidler, sent via fax to Doron Weinberg, might be a legal issue later but I do not know. I have no doubt that Phillip will want to know.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Correcting Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Latest Round Of Lies And Attempts To Slander And Undermine Me - Including Using Boulder PD’S “tactics”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:22 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko - the Treasury,
Let me assure you that I had dinner with Phil Spector after the Clarkson incident. Leonard Cohen personally knew this and was intrigued. That’s relevant to me - particularly as Brian Bennet/DA’s Office told me that an anonymous tip was placed to the District Attorney about Phillip and my friendship - by a woman. That’s a direct quote. How would Gianelli-Blogonaut know anything about my friendship with Phil Spector or publicly address and/or challenge that? He does not speak for me or Phil Spector and sees Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan copied in here - as he has repeatedly stated publicly. I have no idea if Doron Weinberg is Phillip’s former attorney. I didn’t see anything along those lines addressed publicly by either Phillip or Doron Weinberg. Perhaps Gianelli-Blogonaut did. At the dinner Phillip and I had - that I also discussed with Brian Bennett, I believe but am uncertain (one reason I am documenting everything and have been for approximately five years - and probably did because he wrote, as Dale Kelly - former Special Agent with the FBI and an extremely professional and wonderful man from what I could tell, that Phillip sent a driver for me when, in fact, he came to my house, picked me up, met Rutger, shook his hand, and accompanied me home afterwards) - he told me Clarkson shot herself in his foyer and had been dancing around and playing with a gun. Maybe that’s why Gianelli-Blogonaut is dead set on undermining me and Rutger. Who knows? His motive is broad from what I can tell and extends to both Phillip’s matter and Cohen’s.
All the best,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 5:35 pm
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Dennis Riordan - Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Lying About Me, Phil Spector, Etc. - on his “Blogonaut Blog”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:33 PM
Hello Mr. Riordan,
I am not “furious” (and he couldn’t possibly know this because he doesn’t know me) that Gianelli-Blogonaut has stupidly asserted that I think you can appeal issues that have not been raised. You are Phillip’s appellate lawyer and at some future date I would be interested to talk to you about the fact that Leonard Cohen is raised in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine and whether that will ever be addressed. I do not know if Mick Brown lied to me when he wrote that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury. You do.
Please read what Gianelli-Blogonaut publicly declares will “exclusively” be addressed in Phillip’s appeal. How does he know? Did he break into your office? I know that either you or Mr. Weinberg waved to him on at least one occasion. He publicly stated that. You’re not interested, by chance, in why he called Investigator Frayeh about me, are you? Investigator Frayeh is an investigator (or was until he was moved which is interesting, no?) on Phil Spector’s matter that I view as a set up. How about his public allegations about me and Pat Dixon? I can assure you, and I have worked for and with excellent attorneys, that I would be focused on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s activities.
Do you think “Kelly Green” has made a serious threat against my son Rutger - publicly declaring that he could go to prison because I provided the IRS with evidence supporting the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud? You understand evidence and threats, don’t you Mr .Riordan? You probably also understand how deadly serious this matter is. You do not, to me, seem like a frivolous person and did not sound like one the night I phoned your office with respect to what was going on with Gianelli-Blogonaut and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office, the Phil Spector matter, etc. You personally answered the phone.
Why would Phil Spector have a “propensity” to kill Clarkson. He didn’t know her, had his driver waiting to take her home, and the forensic science concluded that she shot herself - which is precisely what Phillip told me when we had dinner. This is being challenged but Phillip and I can assure you that we had dinner. Rutger met Phillip that night. And Cohen knew I had dinner with Phillip and wondered, to me, if I could end up in a photograph with Phillip in People magazine. In other words, he was clear that his good rock ‘n roll coments were coming back to haunt him. He was also scared to speak to the detectives who repeatedly called and attempted to avoid them. I am the one that asked Steve Cron to be present for that meeting. I felt a witness was necessary but did not want to be questioned about my friendship with Phillip and Steve Cron advised me to leave when the detectives arrived which I did.
All the best,
Kelley
“That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).”
Did you see Sean Ogden’s public post? It’s incredibly disturbing and heartbreaking. So many people have been devastated by this absolutely vicious situation. For the record, I do not and never have viewed Phillip as a misogynist. I viewed Cohen as one.
Love,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Agent Sopko - Treasury Department: I Have Finished Addressing Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Latest Round Of Public Lies About Me on blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:58 PM
P.S. I welcome your views on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s comments and my personal theories and positions. I know the views of intelligent decent human beings - they are wondering why Cohen has been arrested and prosecuted; wonder why Alan Jackson hasn’t been arrested and prosecuted; believe the FBI/DOJ should investigate this matter (and the DEA and Immigration) and seize Jackson and Gianelli’s computers; think the District Attorney of Los Angeles set Phil Spector up because LA enjoys the sporting event known as a “celebrity murder trial,” wonders why DeSouza hasn’t been deported; understand that my life was in deadly serious jeopardy (Kyabje Thinley Norbu, if you can imagine this, was concerned about my welfare as Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche pointed out), and absolutely feel that I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to crush me as a witness against Leonard Cohen in a potentially pending IRS matter. That’s why they think the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should investigate Steve Cooley, this entire situation, and as Boies Schiller noted - take down some Hollywood “frauds.’ These are ordinary people who apparently have some faith that our system works, that our federal agencies serve a person, and do not believe it is acceptable or appropriate to engage in politics or worry about issues concerning liability involving federal agencies (that would be Immigration specifically - with respect to DeSouza and I saw that issue arising a million miles away). They do not like police misconduct or police corruption and/or political/government corruption. These are the ordinary people of the United States of America and every single person I have spoken with has essentially drawn the same conclusion which is stunning and astounding. Sharmapa drew this conclusion when I spoke to him about this in Virginia - it’s corrupt cops and corrupt government. He should know - he’s standing them down, as we speak, on the borders of India, China, Tibet, Taiwan, and elsewhere. Sharmapa’s extremely brave and, as I told him personally, he is a hero. He told me, personally, that I will be victorious. I believe that. I have now addressed Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest public lies about me.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Dennis Riordan - Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Lying About Me, Phil Spector, Etc. - on his “Blogonaut Blog”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:51 PM
To the DOJ and FBI,
Why is Gianelli-Blogonaut so obsessed with my being “down and out?” What does that prove? This is precisely what I have requested, repeatedly, a complete and proper forensic accounting from Cohen . Please note - he publicly advised Brian Johnson in his interview that he was not accusing me of “theft” and the “massive tax hit” has been raised in that interview as well. This always causes me to think of the extremely nice and professional Duty Officer I spoke to the day I was at the Boulder Public Library when he called me. He seemed to think the “bikini”/SWAT incident was amusing. Many people think that’s amusing. They also think it prohibited LAPD/Inglewood PD from harming me and essentially protected my life since no one could claim they saw a “bulge” or assert that I was going for a “weapon” - which may have been Rutger’s registered shotgun (that he used solely at the shooting range and which was taken into “evidence” by West LAPD although I don’t know why … it wasn’t in my house which his where I was - it was “locked” in the guest house and only Rutger had the key: Lindsey and Superfon were aware of this if you care to investigate that matter).
How would Gianelli-Blogonaut know or be in a position to publicly assert that I am the former acquaintance of a celebrity (who I assume is Phil Spector which is not an accurate description of our friendship). He has publicly stated that he does not know me and/or Spector. His obsession with me, which is why the Houston FBI is copied in here - because he monitors my action but lied publicly that I was in Mexico), is really worth noting as is the fact that he lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and has taken to insulting Agent Sopko - calling her my “pet” federal agent.
Gianelli-Blogonaut is clear that I have spent countless hours, endless emails, hundreds of posts, attempting to correct his lies, slander, defamation, character assassination, threats, intimidation attempts, and outright blatant attempts to undermine me as a potential witness in a number of matters and probably to derail any potential federal criminal prosecution(s) relating to these matters. I have absolutely asked for investigatoins . I personally will address the issues with Gianelli being disbarred. He is a lawyer, understands the law, and this is a game for him as he has clearly noted. Blogonaut is Gianelli. Gianelli is Blogonaut. How, therefore, does Blogonaut write and state “demand our attorney’s disbarment?” Gianelli is and always will be Blogonaut and visa versa. I haven’t heard of an alter ego defense yet, have you? Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated, for the record, that all of my emails are cc’d to the IRS, Tresaury agent Sopko, the Department of Justice, the Governor of Colorado and many others. Why? Why would all of you be copied in on these emails?
What does this maniac mean when he says “it is once again time to join the internet discussion bout Ms. Lynch raging on other sites.” First of all nothing is raging on “other sites.” There is a tremendous amount of slander, defamation, libel going on at Phawker.com (http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214040). There are intimidation attempts. There are threats - including that Rutger could go to prison for evidence I have provided the IRS. Does that sound right to attorneys at the Department of Justice or the FBI? How about agents? Does it sound like they are attempting to terrorize Rutger? I think so. Take a look at the chronology of posts at the Phawker site I just provided a link for. Phawker posted my comments in response to their article about Cohen. I am not going to sit by silently while my reputatoin is being trashed by liars, thugs, and people I believe have motive. Who descended on that site? Susanne Walsh, Sydney (who is on Blogonaut’s Blog posting about Phil Spector’s matter), Gianelli and Blogonaut, Kelly Green, and others. If you read through them you will see that I am addressing their lies, their slander, their attempts to undermine me.
Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly identified my “motivation” - that I am always trying to “inject” Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen. Funny - he does seem to understand that the matters are intertwined, has been in contact with Cohen’s advisers, lied to Agent Wynar/FBI, contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury, contacted Investigator Frayeh/Phil Spector Murder Trial investigator, and apparently has information supporting his public allegation that Pat Dixon, who must be a true nut, “fears for his life” because I quoted Eminem’s lyrics to “Puke” - the live version refers to “dry humping” and Larry Fidler made some sick joke about what he does or does not wear under his robes which I found disgusting in a murder trial that I view as a set up.
I want to know what Gianelli-Blogonaut’s connections are to the Los Angeles District Attorney, Alan Jackson (who has been advised not to destroy any potential evidence relating to these issues) who Gianelli-Blogonaut confirmed had communicated with him (and visa versa), the Clarkson family, Leonard Cohen, my former so-called friends (no doubt who have motive), and others involved in this disgraceful travesty of justice and anything known as decency.
All the best,
Kelley
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
In other words, Lynch (at least in our view) has her hand out plain and simple.
That core motivation, in our opinion, is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.
November 27th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Gianelli-Blogonaut - I have now addressed your latest round of lies, slander, etc. You are one and the same.
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 10:19 PM
I look forward to following the comments which I will carefully document. And now, until you weigh in on me again in an attempt to undermine my credibility, you and your rotten lying “reporter” are removed from my emails to the “feds” and others. Please feel free to use Bill Pavelic to undermine me and cause Rutger to become upset. I will absolutely ask Phil Spector to address Bill Pavelic’s email to you and to have his attorneys review all my emails with Bill Pavelic to determine what confused him.
Why don’t you at least take “bastards” out of quotes. I don’t talk like some arrogant fop but I recognize one.
Kelley Lynch
November 27th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Yet another long lie that will be posted at cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com, has been addressed, and sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, Agent Sopko-the Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others - including “Alan Jackson/Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.”
KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?
Opinion—By Blogonaut
It turns out Kelley Lynch is a Johnny-come-lately Phil Spector “supporter”, who may be more motivated by money than friendship. Or is she?
Although the Leonard Cohen nemesis claims that she is a “dear friend” of the music producer, doubts remain.
Phil Spector’s close friends (and even some fans) attended at least one of Spector’s trial sessions as a show of support. Kelley Lynch never showed up once for any of the pretrial proceedings or any of the trial days for the two nine month trials—even though the Spectors were urging fans and friends to drop by and show their support on their website. Nor has Lynch been to visit her “dear friend” in prison since his conviction on murder charges earlier this year.
About two or three months before the end of the second Spector murder trial Kelley Lynch launched her first blog that she entitled “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch”, a site that assumed that Spector would be acquitted and then Phil Spector would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team to JOIN Lynch in suing her imagined enemies, including the LAPD, and in suing Cohen. (The site has since been removed by Google.)
Kelley Lynch has tried to make a case that her legal woes and Phil Spector’s legal problems were intertwined.
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
Of course, Leonard Cohen never testified against Phil Spector, and Phil Spector’s legal team never raised any claim that there was perjured testimony before the grand jury that indicted the music producer in the trial court—thus waiving that as a legal issue (if it ever was one).
It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.
But, of course, it is fantasy constructed on the thinnest of foundations, because there never was any “linkage” between Kelley Lynch’s legal troubles and those of the music producer—except that Lynch and Spector knew each other (it is not clear how well) years ago, and (she claims) dined together (in addition to how many others she has not said) after Clarkson’s death.
That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).
The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
In other words, Lynch (at least in our view) has her hand out plain and simple.
That core motivation, in our opinion, is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.
BTW, some of you may notice that we have not posted on this subject in some time, but with over 100 emails in our inbox (several within the hour) from Kelley Lynch disparaging this blog and demanding our attorney’s “disbarment”, “arrest” and “prosecution” for daring to disagree with Kelley Lynch’s far out views—all cc’d to the IRS, Treasury agent Sopko, the Department of Justice, the Governor of Colorado and many others—we decided it is once again time to join the internet discussion about Ms. Lynch raging on other sites.
We welcome your views in the comments.
Posted by Blogonaut at 11:28 AM
November 27th, 2009 at 7:19 pm
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *irs. commissioner ; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ASKDOJ ; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; Lee K. Alpert ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane ; Mick Brown ; dboies@bsfllp.com; Governor.ritter@state.co.us; attorney. general ; attorney.general@ag.ky.gov; stan.garnett@gmail.com; gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm ; LarryHank ; Chief of PoliceJohn Hall ; lwieseltier@tnr.com; Joff Belark ; zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com; dbergman@bergman-law.com; RandHoffman ; wennermedia@gmail.com; Paul Huebl ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ; USCISWebmaster ; Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov; mayor@cityofhouston.net; mayor@lacity.org; Colleen (SOS)Chaney ; wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov; billpavelic@aol.com; Teresa Low ; OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ; MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ; PIU ; chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org; Scott A.Edelman ; KDoran@gibsondunn.com; governor@governor.ca.gov; harriet.ryan@latimes.com; DavidLauter ; Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net; David Moorhead
Cc: doronweinberg ; Dennis ; mpduke1@msn.com; karen@mccourt.org; david@mccourt.org; van.penick@mcinnescooper.com; legal-support@google.com; nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 3:06:41 PM
Subject: Why Kelley Has Asked The IRS/FBI To Meet With Her, Rutger, Interview Ray, And Speak To Karen, David, And Douglas Penick - Now.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *irs. commissioner ; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ASKDOJ ; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; Lee K. Alpert ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane ; Mick Brown ; dboies@bsfllp.com; Governor.ritter@state.co.us; attorney. general ; attorney.general@ag.ky.gov; stan.garnett@gmail.com; gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm ; LarryHank ; Chief of PoliceJohn Hall ; lwieseltier@tnr.com; Joff Belark ; zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com; dbergman@bergman-law.com; RandHoffman ; wennermedia@gmail.com; Paul Huebl ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ; USCISWebmaster ; Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov; mayor@cityofhouston.net; mayor@lacity.org; Colleen (SOS)Chaney ; wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov; billpavelic@aol.com; Teresa Low ; OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ; MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ; PIU ; chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org; Scott A.Edelman ; KDoran@gibsondunn.com; governor@governor.ca.gov; harriet.ryan@latimes.com; DavidLauter ; Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net; David Moorhead
Cc: doronweinberg ; Dennis ; mpduke1@msn.com; karen@mccourt.org; david@mccourt.org; van.penick@mcinnescooper.com; legal-support@google.com; nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 3:05:04 PM
Subject: IRS - Re. The Threat To Put Rutger In Prison - It Relates To The Evidence I Sent You
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Gianelli-Blogonaut is well aware that I cannot have anyone criminally prosecuted. He is attempting to soften the blow of the public threat about Rutger going to prison for “aiding and abetting.” Would you like to take a look at “Kelly Green’s” comments and how “Blogonaut-Gianelli” addresses them? I want Rutger protected and I want to know who “Kelly Green” is and what its motive is here - apart from slandering me, lying about me, and attempting to terrorize Rutger, and push my family members to their “breaking point.” As you see, this is intentional and the person (people) know what it/they are doing. Does the IRS think it is acceptable for Rutger to be terrorized now? I think Rutger, Ray, and I deserve the protections available to potential witnesses from the federal government. That will not include the “witness protection program” although I see people intend to target us and view the “witness protection program” itself as a threat. I view it as a place where cowards, like Gravano, run and hide - and get nailed dealing drugs to teenagers in an unsuspecting community (as I saw Bruce Cutler raise as a very real issue with another “witness,” I might point out).
I think an IRS and/or FBI Agent should meet with me, meet with Rutger, sit down with each of us at this moment in time, and discuss what is going on - including as it relates to the threat issued about Rutger that relates specifically and clearly to a potential IRS prosecutoin of Leonard Cohen and the evidence I provided the IRS. I think if an IRS and/or FBI Agent met with us now we would be afforded some protection. I also think men might be interested to see Rutger’s state of mind, his demeanor, and note - for the record - that he is an unpeachable potential witness who people want to push to his breaking point, threaten, and intimidate him. This sounds like an extremely reasonable way to address the present threats. We do not want to go into the witness protection program although that program and my safety has repeatedly been raised as issues. Director Black/Star of Hope, after drawing certain conclusions about what was going on here, questioned my safety.
In any event, I believe this is precisely what needs to happen at this moment in time. Let me address yet another lie of Gianelli-Blogonaut’s. I have never stated, anywhere, that I “intend” to have “anyone criminally prosecuted.” I am personally convinced that Gianelli-Blogonaut and many many others have engaged in very serious criminal conduct (including lying to Agent Wynar/FBI) and should be investigated and prosecuted. Trust me - I am convinced of this and if you brought every single IRS employee, FBI employee, DOJ employee, and Treasury employee (all of whom could conceivably be dragged into this situation by the time it’s resolved) not one of them would win a debate against me. Not one could raise a credible and/or valid argument to the contrary. It’s not that I’m stubborn. I can and do know how to concede a point and I know how to accept responsibility for my actions - as Director Black has pointed out graciously while accepting responsibility for his and the Star of Hope’s actions that are behind us re. staph infection, etc.). There is no rational, logical, decent, or reasonable excuse for this conduct. The lengths I have had to go to correct and address the lies, slander, etc. has been unreal.
I also think an IRS and/or FBI Agent should personally visit Ray Charles Lindsey to determine if he is ok, what is going on, and what he recalls of the conversation he witnessed between me and Robert Kory. That’s all I think should be addressed at this time. I do not believe his father or Bergman - who does not represent Ray in any way whatsoever - should be permitted to be involved in that interview. I think Ray needs protection.
Finally, I think an IRS and/or FBI Agent should phone my sister and her husband and Douglas Penick. The goal is obviously to push me and my family to the breaking point. Because I reported criminal tax fraud and felt it was my civic duty to do so - I think the federal government should respect that and offer my family these minimal conversations. It doesn’t seem unreasonble to me and, I firmly believe, would serve - to some extent - to protect us. I’ll see what my friends and others think about this request.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
“Why don’t you answer my questions about how you intend to put my son, Rutger, in prison?”
No one has said they intend to have anyone criminally prosecuted except for YOU Kelley Lynch.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *irs. commissioner ; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ASKDOJ ; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; Lee K. Alpert ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane ; Mick Brown ; dboies@bsfllp.com; Governor.ritter@state.co.us; attorney. general ; attorney.general@ag.ky.gov; stan.garnett@gmail.com; gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm ; LarryHank ; Chief of PoliceJohn Hall ; lwieseltier@tnr.com; Joff Belark ; zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com; dbergman@bergman-law.com; RandHoffman ; wennermedia@gmail.com; Paul Huebl ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ; USCISWebmaster ; Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov; mayor@cityofhouston.net; mayor@lacity.org; Colleen (SOS)Chaney ; wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov; billpavelic@aol.com; Teresa Low ; OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ; MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ; PIU ; chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org; Scott A.Edelman ; KDoran@gibsondunn.com; governor@governor.ca.gov; harriet.ryan@latimes.com; DavidLauter ; Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net; David Moorhead
Cc: doronweinberg ; Dennis ; mpduke1@msn.com; karen@mccourt.org; david@mccourt.org; van.penick@mcinnescooper.com; legal-support@google.com
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 2:48:16 PM
Subject: Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Email To Me Confirming Receipt Of Mine - I’ll Ask Him How Someone Knows That I’m “Harassing” Alan Jackson
Thanks for confirming that you understand you are lying about me, slandering me, attempting to undermine my credibility as a witness in any matters relating to an IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen, arising from the situation with Phil Spector, and relating to me and other issues - of course, the threat to put Rutger in prison is my main focus right now. Perhaps the IRS knows the actual laws about providing them with evidence and who could put Rutger in prison. This is an intimidation attempt and a threat, that you wanted ot address personally Gianelli-Blogonaut on Phawker’s Blog. The threat is too serious for me to address with you. It demands an investigation - by Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko-the Treasury. The “even family members have breaking point” comment posted by Kelly Green is truly fascinating. That’s what I thought - that Rutger was being targeted and threatened, attacked, etc. in order to “break” him. People are clear - he’s a witness and he supports me. You saw this quote, Gianelli-Blogonaut: you addressed it but you are twisting my words. I did not say that anyone intended to have Rutger “criminally prosecuted.” I said this is a criminal threat, a terrorist threat, witness intimidation, harassment, cyber-terrorism, and wondered who has the power and motive to prosecute Rutger. Kelly Green spefi
Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison;
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
“Why do you answer my questions about how you intend to put my son, Rutger, in prison?”
No one has said they intend to have anyone criminally prosecuted except for YOU Kelley Lynch.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
As if dragging you own children deep into you personal pool of quick sand, now you intend to drag Dian Ogden’s son down with you. Just who the hell do you think you are?
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Kelley, the only thing the IRS, FBI, or any other agency will ever share with you is space on this earth—and perhaps they’re unhappy about sharing that much with you!
Phil Spector doesn’t care a wit what others think of you. Most likely, you’re just providing entertainment—comic relief. The IRS staff reads your emails for entertainment purposes only. No one has to undermine your credibility, Kelley. Congratulations, you’ve done that all by yourself.
Kelley, all your internet postings and emails indicate just one thing—your descent into utter madness and insanity. You foolishly, foolishly think your story will be a “Hollywood Blockbuster”. How much more embarrassment must you family endure? It’s unfortunate not one person cares about you enough or loves you enough to see to it you get professional help: but even family members have a breaking point.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
Subject: Re: Gianelli-Blogonaut - I have now addressed your latest round of lies, slander, etc. You are one and the same.
To: “Kelley Lynch”
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 10:25 PM
“you and your rotten lying “reporter” are removed from my emails to the “feds” and others.”
Since we now have 175 emails in our inbox from you, we certainly hope so. (We note however, you said the same thing Thanksgiving day and continued to email us.)
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan - See Blogonaut: I’m “harassing Alan Jackson”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 10:29 PM
Hello,
Here are the comments and Gianelli-Blogonaut and Belark are now being copied in again.
Love,
Kelley
4 comments:
I want to know who Anonymous is and how they know that I am harassing Alan Jackson or that he believes that. I don’t think my letter to Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson is evidence that I’m harassing him. I think it’s evidence that he probably set up Phil Spector and is potentially affiliated with Gianelli-Blogonaut.
Anonymous said…
She’s harassing Alan Jackson.
Link contains Kelley Lynch’s article to Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson and probably other slander, lies, etc. about her.
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
November 27, 2009 12:41 PM
Why does Susanne Walsh think Blogonaut-Gianelli’s latest round of lies, that he can never prove, will silence me? Because she’s a moronic cult victim without a brain, that’s why.
sanneka said…
Wonderful Blogonaut, you have been more patient and decent to this woman than anybody could reasonable expect.
Hopefully this blog will finalize Kelley Lynch’s hobby and career as a full time slanderer.
Susanne
November 27, 2009 12:15 PM
Terrorist threat. Someone ran into see if I was all right the other day when they saw three cops outside a building and knew I was inside. That individual, and the witness to that situation, felt I was a “cop magnet” and understand precisely what has gone on here.
Anonymous said…
I’m shocked she is still around and hasn’t been put away. She is a danger to herself and others.
November 27, 2009 12:36 PM
Because I’m telling the truth and the truth, while ugly, is not slander or defamation, etc. Additionally, I deleted the philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com Blog and Google’s lawyers should have been able to figure that out in 2 minutes. I see they are obsessed with me and the motive is to silence me. Gianelli-Blogonaut has been clear that the issues are the fact that Cohen-Phillip’s matters are intertwined. I didn’t say that - they are. That is supported by evidence. And, I was caught in the middle while, at the same, reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS.
Anonymous said…
Is this her blog again? How come she is able to start another one?
http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/
Isn’t KL the cyberterrorist?
November 27, 2009 12:54 PM
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Gianelli-Blogonaut - I have now addressed your latest round of lies, slander, etc. You are one and the same.
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 10:19 PM
I look forward to following the comments which I will carefully document. And now, until you weigh in on me again in an attempt to undermine my credibility, you and your rotten lying “reporter” are removed from my emails to the “feds” and others. Please feel free to use Bill Pavelic to undermine me and cause Rutger to become upset. I will absolutely ask Phil Spector to address Bill Pavelic’s email to you and to have his attorneys review all my emails with Bill Pavelic to determine what confused him.
Why don’t you at least take “bastards” out of quotes. I don’t talk like some arrogant fop but I recognize one.
Kelley Lynch
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 10:16 PM
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
One more issue I want to address that Gianelli-Blogonaut who seems to think he is two different people. I don’t. He’s one person slander me, obsessed with me, intent on undermining me, using Boulder PD to further target and demean me, and unbelievably focused on Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen. Also, he’s been in touch with Cohen’s advisers and men who were part of the Phil Spector insanity at the District Attorney’s office. He has attempted to use Bill Pavelic to undermine me. It’s not going to happen and I will take Bill Pavelic on directly. Rutger has now been threatened with prison and I can assure you that this is a deadly serious matter. Gianelli-Blogonaut is going to have to prove that I intend to “persuade” Phillip to “ride” to my “rescue” with “hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.” I think two of you probably see right through this man and may agree with me - the California State Bar would be better off without him and he has engaged in criminal conduct. I do not speak for you but I know other intelligent people feel this way and cannot believe that Phillip would condone this activity.
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/11/kelley-lynchphil-spector-friend-or.html
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Agent Sopko - Treasury Department: I Have Finished Addressing Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Latest Round Of Public Lies About Me on blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:58 PM
P.S. I welcome your views on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s comments and my personal theories and positions. I know the views of intelligent decent human beings - they are wondering why Cohen has been arrested and prosecuted; wonder why Alan Jackson hasn’t been arrested and prosecuted; believe the FBI/DOJ should investigate this matter (and the DEA and Immigration) and seize Jackson and Gianelli’s computers; think the District Attorney of Los Angeles set Phil Spector up because LA enjoys the sporting event known as a “celebrity murder trial,” wonders why DeSouza hasn’t been deported; understand that my life was in deadly serious jeopardy (Kyabje Thinley Norbu, if you can imagine this, was concerned about my welfare as Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche pointed out), and absolutely feel that I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to crush me as a witness against Leonard Cohen in a potentially pending IRS matter. That’s why they think the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should investigate Steve Cooley, this entire situation, and as Boies Schiller noted - take down some Hollywood “frauds.’ These are ordinary people who apparently have some faith that our system works, that our federal agencies serve a person, and do not believe it is acceptable or appropriate to engage in politics or worry about issues concerning liability involving federal agencies (that would be Immigration specifically - with respect to DeSouza and I saw that issue arising a million miles away). They do not like police misconduct or police corruption and/or political/government corruption. These are the ordinary people of the United States of America and every single person I have spoken with has essentially drawn the same conclusion which is stunning and astounding. Sharmapa drew this conclusion when I spoke to him about this in Virginia - it’s corrupt cops and corrupt government. He should know - he’s standing them down, as we speak, on the borders of India, China, Tibet, Taiwan, and elsewhere. Sharmapa’s extremely brave and, as I told him personally, he is a hero. He told me, personally, that I will be victorious. I believe that. I have now addressed Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest public lies about me.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Dennis Riordan - Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Lying About Me, Phil Spector, Etc. - on his “Blogonaut Blog”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:51 PM
To the DOJ and FBI,
Why is Gianelli-Blogonaut so obsessed with my being “down and out?” What does that prove? This is precisely what I have requested, repeatedly, a complete and proper forensic accounting from Cohen . Please note - he publicly advised Brian Johnson in his interview that he was not accusing me of “theft” and the “massive tax hit” has been raised in that interview as well. This always causes me to think of the extremely nice and professional Duty Officer I spoke to the day I was at the Boulder Public Library when he called me. He seemed to think the “bikini”/SWAT incident was amusing. Many people think that’s amusing. They also think it prohibited LAPD/Inglewood PD from harming me and essentially protected my life since no one could claim they saw a “bulge” or assert that I was going for a “weapon” - which may have been Rutger’s registered shotgun (that he used solely at the shooting range and which was taken into “evidence” by West LAPD although I don’t know why … it wasn’t in my house which his where I was - it was “locked” in the guest house and only Rutger had the key: Lindsey and Superfon were aware of this if you care to investigate that matter).
How would Gianelli-Blogonaut know or be in a position to publicly assert that I am the former acquaintance of a celebrity (who I assume is Phil Spector which is not an accurate description of our friendship). He has publicly stated that he does not know me and/or Spector. His obsession with me, which is why the Houston FBI is copied in here - because he monitors my action but lied publicly that I was in Mexico), is really worth noting as is the fact that he lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and has taken to insulting Agent Sopko - calling her my “pet” federal agent.
Gianelli-Blogonaut is clear that I have spent countless hours, endless emails, hundreds of posts, attempting to correct his lies, slander, defamation, character assassination, threats, intimidation attempts, and outright blatant attempts to undermine me as a potential witness in a number of matters and probably to derail any potential federal criminal prosecution(s) relating to these matters. I have absolutely asked for investigatoins . I personally will address the issues with Gianelli being disbarred. He is a lawyer, understands the law, and this is a game for him as he has clearly noted. Blogonaut is Gianelli. Gianelli is Blogonaut. How, therefore, does Blogonaut write and state “demand our attorney’s disbarment?” Gianelli is and always will be Blogonaut and visa versa. I haven’t heard of an alter ego defense yet, have you? Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated, for the record, that all of my emails are cc’d to the IRS, Tresaury agent Sopko, the Department of Justice, the Governor of Colorado and many others. Why? Why would all of you be copied in on these emails?
What does this maniac mean when he says “it is once again time to join the internet discussion bout Ms. Lynch raging on other sites.” First of all nothing is raging on “other sites.” There is a tremendous amount of slander, defamation, libel going on at Phawker.com (http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214040). There are intimidation attempts. There are threats - including that Rutger could go to prison for evidence I have provided the IRS. Does that sound right to attorneys at the Department of Justice or the FBI? How about agents? Does it sound like they are attempting to terrorize Rutger? I think so. Take a look at the chronology of posts at the Phawker site I just provided a link for. Phawker posted my comments in response to their article about Cohen. I am not going to sit by silently while my reputatoin is being trashed by liars, thugs, and people I believe have motive. Who descended on that site? Susanne Walsh, Sydney (who is on Blogonaut’s Blog posting about Phil Spector’s matter), Gianelli and Blogonaut, Kelly Green, and others. If you read through them you will see that I am addressing their lies, their slander, their attempts to undermine me.
Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly identified my “motivation” - that I am always trying to “inject” Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen. Funny - he does seem to understand that the matters are intertwined, has been in contact with Cohen’s advisers, lied to Agent Wynar/FBI, contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury, contacted Investigator Frayeh/Phil Spector Murder Trial investigator, and apparently has information supporting his public allegation that Pat Dixon, who must be a true nut, “fears for his life” because I quoted Eminem’s lyrics to “Puke” - the live version refers to “dry humping” and Larry Fidler made some sick joke about what he does or does not wear under his robes which I found disgusting in a murder trial that I view as a set up.
I want to know what Gianelli-Blogonaut’s connections are to the Los Angeles District Attorney, Alan Jackson (who has been advised not to destroy any potential evidence relating to these issues) who Gianelli-Blogonaut confirmed had communicated with him (and visa versa), the Clarkson family, Leonard Cohen, my former so-called friends (no doubt who have motive), and others involved in this disgraceful travesty of justice and anything known as decency.
All the best,
Kelley
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
In other words, Lynch (at least in our view) has her hand out plain and simple.
That core motivation, in our opinion, is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Dennis Riordan - Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Lying About Me, Phil Spector, Etc. - on his “Blogonaut Blog”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:33 PM
Hello Mr. Riordan,
I am not “furious” (and he couldn’t possibly know this because he doesn’t know me) that Gianelli-Blogonaut has stupidly asserted that I think you can appeal issues that have not been raised. You are Phillip’s appellate lawyer and at some future date I would be interested to talk to you about the fact that Leonard Cohen is raised in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine and whether that will ever be addressed. I do not know if Mick Brown lied to me when he wrote that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury. You do.
Please read what Gianelli-Blogonaut publicly declares will “exclusively” be addressed in Phillip’s appeal. How does he know? Did he break into your office? I know that either you or Mr. Weinberg waved to him on at least one occasion. He publicly stated that. You’re not interested, by chance, in why he called Investigator Frayeh about me, are you? Investigator Frayeh is an investigator (or was until he was moved which is interesting, no?) on Phil Spector’s matter that I view as a set up. How about his public allegations about me and Pat Dixon? I can assure you, and I have worked for and with excellent attorneys, that I would be focused on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s activities.
Do you think “Kelly Green” has made a serious threat against my son Rutger - publicly declaring that he could go to prison because I provided the IRS with evidence supporting the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud? You understand evidence and threats, don’t you Mr .Riordan? You probably also understand how deadly serious this matter is. You do not, to me, seem like a frivolous person and did not sound like one the night I phoned your office with respect to what was going on with Gianelli-Blogonaut and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office, the Phil Spector matter, etc. You personally answered the phone.
Why would Phil Spector have a “propensity” to kill Clarkson. He didn’t know her, had his driver waiting to take her home, and the forensic science concluded that she shot herself - which is precisely what Phillip told me when we had dinner. This is being challenged but Phillip and I can assure you that we had dinner. Rutger met Phillip that night. And Cohen knew I had dinner with Phillip and wondered, to me, if I could end up in a photograph with Phillip in People magazine. In other words, he was clear that his good rock ‘n roll coments were coming back to haunt him. He was also scared to speak to the detectives who repeatedly called and attempted to avoid them. I am the one that asked Steve Cron to be present for that meeting. I felt a witness was necessary but did not want to be questioned about my friendship with Phillip and Steve Cron advised me to leave when the detectives arrived which I did.
All the best,
Kelley
That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).
Did you see Sean Ogden’s public post? It’s incredibly disturbing and heartbreaking. So many people have been devastated by this absolutely vicious situation. For the record, I do not and never have viewed Phillip as a misogynist. I viewed Cohen as one.
Love,
Kelley
The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Correcting Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Latest Round Of Lies And Attempts To Slander And Undermine Me - Including Using Boulder PD’S “tactics”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:24 PM
P.S. I don’t get furious when Gianelli-Blogonaut insists that Phil Spector’s appeal will contain any references to me whatsoever. He is lying. Why would I be raised on appeal when I am not in any legal court record relating to Phil Spector’s legal matters? That is preposterous and there would be nothing to appeal. My fax to Judge Larry Fidler, sent via fax to Doron Weinberg, might be a legal issue later but I do not know. I have no doubt that Phillip will want to know.
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Correcting Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Latest Round Of Lies And Attempts To Slander And Undermine Me - Including Using Boulder PD’S “tactics”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, “Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:22 PM
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko - the Treasury,
Let me assure you that I had dinner with Phil Spector after the Clarkson incident. Leonard Cohen personally knew this and was intrigued. That’s relevant to me - particularly as Brian Bennet/DA’s Office told me that an anonymous tip was placed to the District Attorney about Phillip and my friendship - by a woman. That’s a direct quote. How would Gianelli-Blogonaut know anything about my friendship with Phil Spector or publicly address and/or challenge that? He does not speak for me or Phil Spector and sees Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan copied in here - as he has repeatedly stated publicly. I have no idea if Doron Weinberg is Phillip’s former attorney. I didn’t see anything along those lines addressed publicly by either Phillip or Doron Weinberg. Perhaps Gianelli-Blogonaut did. At the dinner Phillip and I had - that I also discussed with Brian Bennett, I believe but am uncertain (one reason I am documenting everything and have been for approximately five years - and probably did because he wrote, as Dale Kelly - former Special Agent with the FBI and an extremely professional and wonderful man from what I could tell, that Phillip sent a driver for me when, in fact, he came to my house, picked me up, met Rutger, shook his hand, and accompanied me home afterwards) - he told me Clarkson shot herself in his foyer and had been dancing around and playing with a gun. Maybe that’s why Gianelli-Blogonaut is dead set on undermining me and Rutger. Who knows? His motive is broad from what I can tell and extends to both Phillip’s matter and Cohen’s.
All the best,
Kelley
— On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject:
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “ASKDOJ” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , “Lee K. Alpert” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , “Duane” , “Mick Brown” , dboies@bsfllp.com, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , lwieseltier@tnr.com, “Joff Belark” , zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , wennermedia@gmail.com, “Paul Huebl” , Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, mayor@cityofhouston.net, mayor@lacity.org, ” Colleen (SOS)Chaney” , wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, “Teresa Low” , “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , “PIU” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, ” Scott A.Edelman” , KDoran@gibsondunn.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, harriet.ryan@latimes.com, “DavidLauter” , Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, “David Moorhead”
Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , mpduke1@msn.com, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, van.penick@mcinnescooper.com, legal-support@google.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 9:16 PM
P.S. One or two police officers confirmed for Rutger that they intended to shoot me and the dog on May 25, 2005. That means I could have been murdered and goes to motive, from what I can tell - no? They were armed. Rutger was in front of them being used as a hostage negotiator and human shield which I assume illegal and goes against the rules of the Geneva Convention. The conclusion of many many people is that I was going to be shot and drugs possibly were going to be planted on me. My theory - the teenagers disrupted the cops who realized their were “witnesses” - including those that “witnesed” Lindsey lying to the SWAT team. LAPD/Inglewood PD must have realized this also because they illegally entered my house and the guest house and realized there was no “hostage.” This story frightens people about government and law enforcement but this is a high stakes game that Gianelli-Blogonaut and others are playing. I want Boulder PD investigated because Gianelli-Blogonaut is dead set on undermining me using them, they are all over this story, I called Phil Spector immediately after Officer Storbeck and the Police Chief’s Secretary left, it crosses state borders, and probably relates to my communications with LAPD and/or SMART - including “Officer Garrin.” I don’t know why David Moorhead, who told me he is not concerned about testifying in a high profile matter and told Rutger he could be a “material witness” for Phil Spector (now being threatened with prison by “Kelly Green” who did not like Sean Ogden’s public remarks about his mother and the “fucking trial”), felt Kory was behind Boulder PD’s roll-by Deneuve Construction. The IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team should ask him. He’s a very brilliant and wonderful man and an excellent attorney.
“t is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.”
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS Commisisoner’s Staff,
How would Gianelli-Blogonaut (who is copied in here so that it cannot later deny anything) know what does or does not give me false hope? I have asked Phil Spector to join me in a lawsuit against the Los Angeles District Attorney and others. Period. Why is “sue the bastards” in quotes? I have never uttered or written that statement and it is an indication, to me, that I’m dealing with an arrogant fop in Gianelli-Blogonaut who lied to Agent Wynar/FBI, contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury, contacted Investigator Frayeh on Phillip’s matter, and is clear that I am possibly a potential prominent government witness in a pending or possible/probable federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen. Investigator Frayeh did not think this was a federal prank. Investigator Brian Bennett understood that my “matters” are federal. So does Gianelli-Blogonaut, apparently, or he wouldn’t be lying to and insulting federal agents and obviously attempting to derail a federal prosecution that may be pending. He also wouldn’t know if it’s pending and that’s why I think he contacted Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko. How would Gianelli-Blogonaut, who does not know me, know who I want to represent me or what criminal attorney I have consulted? He wouldn’t. He’s a stranger with motive who has communicated with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson.
All the best,
Kelley
It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, “sue the bastards” that have “destroyed” her life.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello Investigator Frayeh,
I would call Rutger’s being threatened with prison a deadly serious issue. Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut (whom you spoke with about your comments regarding Pat Dixon and who lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and is clearly witness tampering with someone he realizes may be a prominent goverment witness potentially in pending federal matter). Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut accused me of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon - a man I do not know and never want to meet. Eminem’s “Puke” sums up precisely how I feel about Pat Dixon. Gianelli-Blogonaut also publicly posted on his Blog that Pat Dixon fears for his life based on the fact that I quoted Eminem’s “Puke.” It is Eminem - not I - who refers to “dry humping” as I pointed out to Gianelli-Blogonaut. I realize you didn’t think Gianelli-Blogonaut read minds when it wrote me about Alan Jackson’s email to me and confirmed that it had received some type of communication from Alan Jackson. I agree - Gianelli-Blogonaut found a sympathetic ear in Alan Jackson and I want to know what Jackson’s connection is to this slander, gossip, attempts to undermine me, and now the threat that Rutger could go to prison.
Did you see Sean Ogden’s post about his mother in her final days, a slow poisoning, and the “fucking trial.” I think the DEA should speak to him and I think that post is devastatingly heartbroken and evidence that children and others have been destroyed through this shameless matter. I can assure you that if I worked for the DEA and read Bill Pavelic’s allegations that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Ogden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery Homicide Unit in retliation for OJ I would take them deadly seroius. Why? Because the DEA is working with LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit on the Michael Jackson homicide. Check out what Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated my angle is. Sounds right to me. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and the entire file is falsified. Rutger, simultaneously, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen and/or Kory (who has a Declaration in Ray’s so called custody matter that John Barry, a renowned songwriter and musician who understood that something was seriously wrong with the Phil Spector matter early on and has seen him in the studio also, explained to Rutger was a “kidnapping.” John Barry is probably one of the most brilliant men I have ever met. He also told me that LAPD might attempt to murder me if I publicly testified. I wonder why he and so many others think I am a potential witness, Bill? You must be aware, knowing John Thompson and Brian Bennett, that I was dragged into Phil Spector’s insanity and was told point blank that I was a probable witness in the Phil Spector matter. I do not believe I will be raised in an appeal since I wasn’t involved with the trials and, fortunately, did not witness the vicious, malicious assaults on Mr. Spector’s character in the court room - something Gianelli-Blogonaut thinks proves something between me and Phil Spector. Do you think he knows what Phil Spector thinks or feels about me? Phil Spector has known Rutger since he was an infant. He and Janis gave me many many items that belonged to Nicole and Phillip, Jr. for Rutger. My sister’s daughter was given the books that belonged to Nicole and Phillip, Jr. Our connection goes way back. When Phillip “picked me up” (Brian Bennett stated in his report I reviewed with Dale Kelly, who I believe is Bruce Cutler’s investigator that I met with and reviewed that report with) and clearly didn’t think any of this was a game, he met Rutger and shook hands with him. He was proud of Rutger and delighted to note that he is a wonderful young man. He is now under serious attack and has lost the fingers on the hand that he told David Moorhead he recalled shaking. David Moorhead, an attorney who is copied in here, thought Rutger might be a “material witness” for Phil Spector. And now he is being threatened - including with “prison.” David Moorhead concluded that the District Attorney of Los Angeles had the power and motive to drag me to Killer King (and question me about Phil Spector) unless the cops acted on their own which I tend to doubt. He also felt that Robert Kory was behind Boulder PD rolling into Deneuve Construction in an attempt to intimidate me. The Denver FBI Duty Agent I spoke to didn’t think LAPD was behind that incident but I believe they were involved.
Thanks for confirming that you don’t think this is a federal prank. I think it’s a nightmare and I think there is a tremendous amount of criminal and unconscionable activity taking place in front of my very eyes.
All the best,
Kelley
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Good Afternoon Sharmapa,
I trust you’re well. Please take a look at Gianelli-Blogonaut’s lies and slander about me - that are on Phawker.com and his Blog, Blogonaut. I have attempted to set the record straight but Gianelli-Blogonaut obviously has huge motive here. Mick Brown wrote me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector in his grand jury and Gianelli-Blogonaut is now attempting to prove that 1) either Mick Brown is a liar; or 2) I am wrong. Can you think of a reason for Mick Brown to lie to me about this?
Please make offerings on behalf of Rutger who has now been threatened with “prison” relating to evidence given to the IRS in connection with supporting the allegations - confirmed by DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess - that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and exposed me to that - as an unwitting pawn. That’s a direct quote that I’ve heard used more than once.
Thank you.
Love,
Kelley
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello Mick,
I am now under attack because you advised me that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury. You advised me that you received a package with the grand jury testimony - including Cohen’s. Why would you lie to me about this? And you followed up and told me who the person was that sent it to you, if you will recall. I worked with Leonard Cohen for approximately 20 years. He never once told me that Phil Spector held a gun on him. That’s quite odd, Mick, since we discussed everything - including the fact (as he publicly stated in Stephen Holden’s interview for Rolling Stone) that he hated his vocals and, as he told me, because he was humiliated that he had to telegram Phillip in order to basically beg him to complete the production. As you noted in your book, without properly citing me as the source (which raises similar issues as Sharmapa has with you in your utterly disgraceful book on the deadly serious politics involving the Kagyu lineage and the politics of India, China, and Tibet - to name a few … I assume you’ve heard that Situ is now considered a national security threat by the Indian government … the “kasung”/guards with the other 17th Karmapa advised me that the State Department was along for the visit - seems fairly heavy to me, Mick), Phillip received hate mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fan and found working with Cohen depressing.
Cohen is also raised as an “example” of a prior bad act, if you see where I’m going Mick, in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine in the Phil Spector matter. Why wasn’t he called to the witness stand to testify against Phillip?
King Drew was a facility that the federal government stepped in and shut down. That’s why it was referred to, primarily by the African American community, as Killer King - because people in South Central understand that you go there to “die.” The District Attorney’s office understands this and that may be why Charles Ornstein/LA Times published the District Attorney’s Confidential Internal Memo, that mentions Jeff Jonas (who I spoke to in Major Fraud), and the fact that Luis Pena - the coroner, is not a credible witness but may lie to keep his job and because he understands the “political” ramificatoins . The memo specifically addresses a death or deaths at Killer King. I was taken there, questioned about Phil Spector en route, and the entire file is falsified. Now do you really believe that Phil Spector won’t address that issue legally, Mick? If so, you don’t know the Phil Spector who I know extremely well. In fact, Janis Zavala Spector told me that 1) she had never seen Phillip with guns (a hell of a comment after approximately 40 years but supports Hal Blaine’s position that he never saw Phillip, in the studio, with guns over a 37 year period; and, 2) I know Phillip better than she does. She also told me that someone, a witness, lied about scheduling the bowling party. Diane Ogden seems to have thought she worked for Phillip in 1988 and 1989 - when I did. His phones were transferred to my house all day long and I spoke to him and Janis frequently. I believe I scheduled an evening date or something like that with Ogden but do not believe she was his personal assistant. Take a look at Sean Ogden’s public posting below. As a Mother - I find it horrifying. What “fucking trial” do you think he’s talking about?
I think there are two suicides here, Mick. Five major forensic scientists testified or stated that Clarkson shot herself. That is precisely what Phillip told me after we had dinner after the Clarkson incident - that Clarkson, a 6′ tall woman who weighed 160 pounds, was dancing around his foyer with a gun. He told me that witnessing her shoot herself was devastating and he told me in no uncertain terms that it was horrendous to be tasered. Therefore, I know that the DA, others, and - in particular, “Pat
November 27th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *irs. commissioner ; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ASKDOJ ; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; Lee K. Alpert ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane ; Mick Brown ; dboies@bsfllp.com; Governor.ritter@state.co.us; attorney. general ; attorney.general@ag.ky.gov; stan.garnett@gmail.com; gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm ; LarryHank ; Chief of PoliceJohn Hall ; lwieseltier@tnr.com; Joff Belark ; zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com; dbergman@bergman-law.com; RandHoffman ; wennermedia@gmail.com; Paul Huebl ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ; USCISWebmaster ; Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov; mayor@cityofhouston.net; mayor@lacity.org; Colleen (SOS)Chaney ; wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov; billpavelic@aol.com; Teresa Low ; OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ; MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ; PIU ; chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org; Scott A.Edelman ; KDoran@gibsondunn.com; governor@governor.ca.gov; harriet.ryan@latimes.com; DavidLauter ; Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net; David Moorhead
Cc: doronweinberg ; Dennis ; mpduke1@msn.com; karen@mccourt.org; david@mccourt.org; van.penick@mcinnescooper.com; legal-support@google.com; nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 3:18:25 PM
Subject: Douglas Penick - Threat Re. Rutger And Prison
Hi Douglas,
What do you think? I think an IRS Agent and FBI Agent should meet with me, Rutger, interview Ray, and speak to Karen, David, and you at this time. I assume you find it completely unacceptable that Rutger was obvoiusly threatened with “aiding and abetting” some crime related to the fact that Provided the IRS with evidence supporting the allegations of Cohen’s criminal tax fraud. I had copies of the corporate books, records, etc. - that were sent to Cohen’s lawyers, Greenberg/Glusker (the original of LC Investments, LLC because I wasn’t a partner). I own 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.
In any event, I think you should phone Van. He is an attorney and I think this warrants very very seroius legal advice.
Thank you.
Love,
Kelley
P.S. They’re clear - my family has a breaking point. I’m clear also - they are attempting to disrail a potential IRS criminal prosecution of Cohen and are witness tampering and attempting to intimidate witnesses - including my family members. That’s why I think an IRS Agent and FBI Agent should now personally meet me and Rutger, interview Ray at his “father’s house” without undue psychological pressure on him (ie., alone), and phone you, Karen and David and possibly my Mother who is afraid she and my Father will also be targeted. My Mother, as you know, is brilliant and understands the law. This is a sick situation. As you may have seen - Bill Pavelic’s confused. So is Investigator Frayeh if he doesn’t realize this is a deadly seroius set up (Phil Spector’s matter) and it relates to Cohen’s tax fraud. Cohen obviously appears in the prosecution’s “Motion In Limine.” Ask Van - does that make Cohen an issue in the Phil Spector matter even if Mick Brown lied to me and Cohen didn’t testify against Phillip in the grand jury? Maybe Van would overlook that “pesky detail” but I tend to doubt it - knowing Van. He may have realized that Ann Diamond posted publicly that Guttman told her Lorca Cohen alleged that her father molested her. He may have realized Cohen slept with a 15 year old nanny and there are no statutes. He may have realized Cohen’s a Canadian living in the U.S. This was an issue for Jean Ransick - Cohen’s bookkeeper - who told me that she concluded he had committed tax fraud in Canada because of this. He may have realized that Cohen had tax and residence issues and all the badges of a resident of Canada. So, knowing Van, he probably understood that there were deadly serious legal matters looming, in the future, for Cohen. He probably understood that the attempts to donate his body of work to the University of Toronto in exchange for a U.S. tax credit might provoke some issues. I thought it would and Cohen’s lawyer, Reeve Chudd, was exasperated when he wrote that he wasn’t an “alchemist.” Call Van. They are targeting Rutger and attempting to push him over the proverbial edge. I’ll let you know if I hear from the IRS and/or FBI.
November 27th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *irs. commissioner ; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ASKDOJ ; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; Lee K. Alpert ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane ; Mick Brown ; dboies@bsfllp.com; Governor.ritter@state.co.us; attorney. general ; attorney.general@ag.ky.gov; stan.garnett@gmail.com; gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm ; LarryHank ; Chief of PoliceJohn Hall ; lwieseltier@tnr.com; Joff Belark ; zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com; dbergman@bergman-law.com; RandHoffman ; wennermedia@gmail.com; Paul Huebl ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ; USCISWebmaster ; Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov; mayor@cityofhouston.net; mayor@lacity.org; Colleen (SOS)Chaney ; wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov; billpavelic@aol.com; Teresa Low ; OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ; MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ; PIU ; chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org; Scott A.Edelman ; KDoran@gibsondunn.com; governor@governor.ca.gov; harriet.ryan@latimes.com; DavidLauter ; Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net; David Moorhead
Cc: doronweinberg ; Dennis ; mpduke1@msn.com; karen@mccourt.org; david@mccourt.org; van.penick@mcinnescooper.com; legal-support@google.com; nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 3:42:44 PM
Subject: Investigator Bill Pavelic
Hello Bill,
That’s been my theory all along - that Diane Ogden was pushed to the point of no return and there are two suicides here. Her son seems to understand that she was slowly poisoning herself and it had something to do with this “fucking trial.” Careful, Bill - you seem to be in the midst of a gang of criminals. That’s my opinion. They are employees of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office who can and do live with their shameless conduct and probably sleep very well at night. I will too - as soon as the IRS and FBI send agents over to speak to me, Rutger, interview Ray, and phone Karen, David, Douglas, and my Mother. You don’t think it’s an issue that Cohen appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine, do you Bill? It looked more like a paragraph than a typo and seemed to address “prior bad acts.” Phil Spector has been rendered unrecognizable, Bill. I know it for a fact. I know him and we are dear friends. The rest of these thugs - including Gianelli-Blogonaut - are just liars.
For the record, I’m not “harassing” Alan Jackson but am removing him now from these emails and will remove you and Bill Pavelic as well.
Thank you.
All the best,
Kelley
November 27th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Do your ex-husband Doug Penick, your sister Karen Lynch and your brother-in-law David McCourt know that you are publishing their names and email addresses on the internet, and that you have also published Rutger Penick’s email address not only to us but scores of others, including the IRS?
November 27th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
PS: “For the record” you copied us with an email over two days ago saying you were removing Alan Jackson, Bill Pavelic, and others (including this blog) from your spam email list–and you are still emailing all three of us 20 times or more a day.
November 27th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Excuse, what do my emails have to do with the fact that you publicly stated that you would remove Alan Jackson. I have not mentioned that you have included my teacher, Ron Burkle, and others - including Rutger. Trust me, I know you want to push him to his breaking point and he has been threatened. Why are you writing me about my sister, my brother-in-law, my ex-husband, and my son. They do not know you and I can assure you (because I know them) that no one thinks the fact that Rutger was threatened with prison (over evidence that I want an IRS agent and FBI agent to pick up from me - even if it’s just copies … which it is) and aiding and abetting criminal acts is anything but a deadly serious issue.
Rutger wrote and asked you not to contact him and stated, very clearly, that he felt you are threatening him.
Bill Pavelic and others can speak for themselves. I am uninterested in anything about Alan Jackson except for your potential connection to him - with respect to the instant matters.
For the record, Rutger has personally written to the IRS (previously). I think they are clear about his feelings and I think they are clear that the IRS doesn’t intimidate him - or anyone for that matter. Having said that - as his Mother I believe you have posted the above remarks and emailed my son today in order to attempt to intimidate him, threaten him, and attempt to push him to his breaking point.
I have absolutely asked the IRS and FBI to send agents to sit down - independently - with me, Rutger, interview Ray at his father’s house, properly collect the evidence that remains (copies of documents that Cohen, I would imagine, has but he hasn’t given me an inventory - and neither has the Sheriff’s Department of the evidence that Raoul Felder thought was probably illegally seized …) and note that they have not been “altered” (ridiculous lie and/or allegation but predictable - not a defense however), and phone my sister, her husband, and of course Douglas Penick who you are not on a friendly basis with so why are you referring to him in the more familiar “Doug” manner?
The reason you can’t follow some of the legal arguments (such as Raoul Felder’s theory of an illegal seizure of documents) or why I do not believe I will be raised on appeal - because I wasn’t raised an “the record” - speaks volumes about you and says nothing about an excellent attorney like Mr. Felder.
Is there something wrong with the IRS having Rutger’s email address? He pays his taxes and the IRS wasn’t, last I heard, terrorizing him or threatening him with prison.
You have now opened a new thread (all lies that I have addressed) on your Blog. You have written me further emails - that are preposterous and pompous which is precisely how I view you. And yet - you’re not obsessed with me, right? A girlfriend of mine nailed this early early on when she told me she had never seen an obsession like you had for me.
Kelley Lynch
November 27th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Re: Why Kelley Has Asked The IRS/FBI To Meet With Her, Rutger, Interview Ray, And Speak To Karen, David, And Douglas Penick - Now.
Fri, November 27, 2009 5:25:35 PMFrom: Kelley Lynch
Add to Contacts
To: nonacbanks@yahoo.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog
Cc: mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com; karen@mccourt.org; david@mccourt.org; mpduke1@msn.com
——————————————————————————–
Thank you Nona. I do think it’s time for me, Rutger, and Ray to meet with IRS and FBI agents. I think it’s time for them to phone Karen, David, Douglas and my parents. And I believe the motive on the part of the “lunatic” (that’s how I see these people also) is to push Rutger to a breaking point - and my family - and intimidate my family, friends, and others. The stakes are high but, as we discussed, Cohen (my ex-partner) committed what appears to be criminal tax fraud; Phil Spector was set up; and my life was destroyed.
That’s right. They don’t know the Kelley you know. They are absolute strangers who seem to have motive to undermine me, threaten my family, and probably derail possible and probable federal criminal prosecutions - hopefully that will include them.
Talk to you tonight.
Love,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: “nonacbanks@yahoo.com”
To: Kelley Lynch
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 3:09:54 PM
Subject: Re: Why Kelley Has Asked The IRS/FBI To Meet With Her, Rutger, Interview Ray, And Speak To Karen, David, And Douglas Penick - Now.
Kelly, u are on it girl! I’m proud of u no matter what the other lunatics have to say. And I love you, they don’t know the Kelley I know.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
November 27th, 2009 at 9:34 pm
Correction: Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden - not “Diane Ogden” who died of a drug overdose.
Did you see Sean Ogden’s post about his mother in her final days, a slow poisoning, and the “fucking trial.” I think the DEA should speak to him and I think that post is devastatingly heartbroken and evidence that children and others have been destroyed through this shameless matter. I can assure you that if I worked for the DEA and read Bill Pavelic’s allegations that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Ogden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery Homicide Unit in retliation for OJ I would take them deadly seroius. Why? Because the DEA is working with LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit on the Michael Jackson homicide. Check out what Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated my angle is.
November 27th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
What’s your point Blogonaut? Bill Pavelic has a website (guiltyofincompetence) stating that he believes he, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaliatoin for the OJ matter. Please see the comments of the man who you are attempting to take cover behind - Bill Pavelic. Please note - I received an email, from an Alhambra official: LAPD does not have jurisdiction over Alhambra matters. That was an amazing email to receive from the City Manager’s Office.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
PS: “For the record” you copied us with an email over two days ago saying you were removing Alan Jackson, Bill Pavelic, and others (including this blog) from your spam email list–and you are still emailing all three of us 20 times or more a day.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:34 am Post subject: LAPD HUNT FOR DR. HENRY LEE - DR. MICHAEL BADEN - B. PAVELIC
——————————————————————————–
THE HUNT FOR DR. HENRY LEE - DR. MICHAEL BADEN AND BILL PAVELIC
“….After years of grabbing negative headlines for losing the OJ Simpson double homicide case and other celebrity trials, involving the same three participants, it was inevitable and predictable that the Los Angeles criminal injustice system via Robbery Homicide Division would administer their personal vendettas against me, Dr. Henry Lee and Dr. Michael Baden. That moment arrived in 2007 when music mogul Phil Spector was charged with the murder of Lana Clarkson and the case was “assigned” to judge Larry Fidler. Revenge by the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division would be a “MF”and “MF” didn’t stand for Mark Fuhrman….”
“….Exposing the truth is never in the interest of those who suppressed it and eliminating the messenger would have to be carried out with precision by the Los Angeles Police Robbery Homicide Division and their protectorate, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office. Knowing that it was only a matter of time before the OJ Simpson facts would be re-calibrated in my “Guilty of Incompetence” expose, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division in the Phil Spector’s (2007) murder trial usurped the Los Angles Superior Court and Jude Larry Fidler, to falsely allege that Dr. Henry Lee, myself, and Dr. Michael Baden, were involved in a bogus “obstruction of justice” crime….”
“….The judge in the televised Phil Spector trial, on behalf of his friend Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon, creatively, albeit injudiciously, granted the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division the commensurate authority to “investigate” the disappearance of non existent “evidence” that was allegedly removed and or discarded by member(s) of the defense team, while conducting an examination of the Lana Clarkson’s accidental suicide shooting scene….”
“….The “missing evidence” and or the “obstruction of justice” investigation was conveniently assigned to Robbery Homicide Division (RHD) investigator Victor Pietrantoni, a key player in the OJ Simpson criminal investigation. What a “happy coincidence” that this case would end up in the lap of Detective Victor Pietrantoni the RHD stud who was nicknamed “Casanova” because of his steamy relationship with a high ranking Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney. As my old LAPD Puerto Rican partner would say, “F—-g a lawyer, especially a district attorney is the ultimate high for a cop and the fastest way to climb the ladder of success….” To be fair, Victor Pietrantoni is just one of many LAPD officers who are incestuously connected and or married to members of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, The City Attorney’s Office and or to the jurists assigned to the Los Angeles and Orange County Superior Courts. Allowing Victor Pietrantoni (on behalf of his wife, DDA Patrick Dixon and Judge Fidler) to conduct an impartial obstruction of justice investigation was tantamount to allowing the fox to investigate who broke into the hen house….”
“….Instead of recusing himself and or convening the Grand Jury to investigate the false allegations which were revolting, contemptible and based on perjurious witnesses, the luminous Judge Larry Fidler took a page from the “Spanish Inquisition” period and used his black robe, minus the hood, to lunch a personal, vicious, unethical and unrelenting smear campaign against Dr. Henry Lee, with one objective in mind; to publicly humiliate and destroy Dr. Henry Lee’s professional reputation, knowing that he can do it with impunity while hiding behind his judicial immunity….”
“….It should have come as no shock to Judge Fidler that dishonesty was compulsory in much of Robbery Homicide Division and that Judge Fidler’s colleagues at the Los Angeles District Attorneys Office have shown an affinity for using the grotesque Robbery Homicide Division to once again, dispense their own form of perverted justice trough manufactured and rigged investigations….”
http://guiltyofincompetence.com/lapd-hunt-for-dr-henry-lee-dr-michael-baden-b-pavelic-t99.html
November 27th, 2009 at 11:06 pm
Criminal Justice
Innocent men and the courts that failed them
Dennis P. Riordan
Sunday, September 14, 2003
——————————————————————————–
Our criminal justice system rests on the principle, as the U.S. Supreme Court stated more than a hundred years ago, that “It is better that 10 guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.”
——————————————————————————–
During the last few months, however, four Bay Area men were freed after spending a better part of their adult lives in California prisons for murders they did not commit: 19 years for Buddy Nickerson; 13 for John Tennison and Antoine Goff; and 12 for Rick Walker. How could these disturbing injustices have happened and what can be done to prevent similar cases?
The painful answer is that the fundamental rules of fairness designed to ensure that innocent defendants are not convicted were violated by police and prosecutors in these cases. With a few notable exceptions, law-enforcement officials do not set out to put the wrong man or woman behind bars; on the contrary, they are deeply committed to ensuring that those who committed offenses are on the receiving end of the punishment those crimes deserve.
But there are police and prosecutors who are convinced that the ultimate determination of guilt and innocence is best left to them, and that neither judges, juries, nor even the Bill of Rights should get in the way. Of course, not every case in which law enforcement officials cheat to gain a conviction costs an innocent party his or her freedom; the informed suspicions of police and prosecutors are often right. But it is an absolute certainty that when time-tested principles for finding the truth are subverted, lies eventually will prevail.
In the cases of Nickerson, Tennison, Goff and Walker, investigators and prosecutors bent the evidence to fit their preconceived notion of the guilt of these men and hid from the defense information that could have proven the contrary. When officials sworn to uphold the law break it, sooner or later killers go free and the innocent suffer.
While the misdeeds of law-enforcement officials can wrongly convict defendants and put them in prison for a year or two, they alone cannot keep an innocent party there for a decade. That is because the state of California spends tens of millions of dollars to maintain a system of appointed appellate lawyers, attorneys general, law clerks and, most important, justices of the state’s six appellatecourts to review all felony convictions, thereby in theory ensuring that each guilty verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was obtained in compliance with the constitutional and statutory provisions designed to ensure that no innocent citizen is ever incarcerated. Had the appeals of Nickerson, Tennison, Goff and Walker from their unjust convictions been successful, they collectively would have served eight to 10 years in prison before their release, a bad enough result, to be sure, but much better than the combined 57 years they in fact waited for their freedom.
Not every miscarriage of justice that escapes appellate scrutiny can fairly be deemed the responsibility of the state’s appeals courts. The jurisdiction of such courts is limited to the issues placed before them by the parties. If police or prosecutors suppress exculpatory evidence without detection, or if appellate counsel for a wrongly convicted defendant fails to competently brief the grave legal errors that led to his or her client’s conviction, an appellate court simply may not have the opportunity to right the wrong that caused that innocent party’s incarceration.
But in the cases of these four men recently freed, the proof that they had been wrongly convicted was placed at one point or another before an appellate tribunal of this state, and in each case that court refused to correct an obvious injustice. Nickerson, Tennison and Goff were freed only when federal courts found that the state appellate courts’ denial of relief in their cases was not simply wrong, but unreasonable.
As for Rick Walker, he was convicted in the 1992 murder of Lisa Hopwell in Cupertino based solely on the uncorroborated testimony of a witness who participated in killing Hopewell and was granted a reduced sentence for testifying that Walker put him up to it. In 1995, the Sixth District Court of Appeal was presented not only with proof that the prosecutor had misled the trial court and the defense concerning secret deals he had made with his witnesses (a grave violation of due process), but with newly discovered evidence that the second killer was not Walker but a man named Mark Swanson. The court rejected the appeal and refused to authorize funds to permit court- appointed counsel to further investigate Swanson’s involvement.
Eight years later, owing to the extraordinary investigative efforts of pro bono lawyer Alison Tucher, the Santa Clara district attorney’s office admitted,
to its credit, that its witness had lied. Walker was freed, and the district attorney charged the man they are now convinced is the second killer: Mark Swanson. Eight years of Walker’s unjust confinement can be directly attributable to the misfeasance of the appellate panel that affirmed his conviction.
When criminal convictions are reversed because a lawyer failed to competently represent his client, or when a prosecutor commits misconduct, the case is referred to the California State Bar for an assessment of that lawyer’s performance. An intentional or reckless flouting of legal principles by a trial judge can lead to investigation by the Commission on Judicial Performance. Likewise, when a state appellate panel ignores constitutional protections and an innocent citizen loses his or her liberty as a result, as was true in these four cases, that court must be held accountable for its breach of duty.
Dennis P. Riordan (dennis@riordan-horgan.com) is a criminal appellate lawyer in San Francisco who served as Rick Walker’s court-appointed lawyer during his state court appeal.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/09/14/ED233468.DTL#ixzz0Y7PNmxMM
November 27th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
Mr. Riordan - I’ve Publicly Posted Your Article … I Should Be Accused Of Copyright Theft In About Five Minutes
Kelley Lynch
27 de noviembre de 2009 19:08
Para: Dennis
Love,
Kelley
Criminal Justice
Innocent men and the courts that failed them
Dennis P. Riordan
Sunday, September 14, 2003
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/09/14/ED233468.DTL
November 28th, 2009 at 12:23 am
Our point is that you are constantly promisng not to send anymore emails to Bill Pavelic, Blogonaut, Alan Jackson, and a certain investigator with the Los Angeles DA’s office, and without fail hours (or sometimes minutes later) we have more emails in our inbox, cc to all of those people.
Our point is that your word is routinely given and then broken minutes later.
Our point is that you (to oversimplify it) are a flake.
November 28th, 2009 at 2:24 am
Where was Kelley?
Kelley, Spector’s #1 fan attended every day of his trials—and she’s a PE teacher. On those days school was in session, she managed to come to the courthouse every day after school. She was present when the verdict was read and she was present when he was sentenced. Where were you, Kelley? Prior to the trials, Phil’s #1 fan had no interaction with Spector; however, she was a true fan and went out of her way, on a daily basis, to be there for Phil and Rochelle. Again, where were you, Kelley?
November 28th, 2009 at 2:30 am
The odds of you ever getting info (with or without a subpoena) from any blog is negligible. Sure, Gianelli, Blogonaut, and Google are quaking in their collective boots. Most likely after receiving your bogus subpoenas, their corporate attorneys will ask a judge to order you to put-up-front a significant amount of cash (think of it as “earnest” money) to ensure you not only have the sufficient money and assets to follow through to trial but also to ensure (after you lose) you have sufficient money and assets to cover the blogs, attorney fees. That’s right, Kelley, after you lose the hearing, you have to pay for their legal fees. Given your track record, Kelley, the judge will issue an order requiring you to put-up cash. If you don’t put-up the cash, your fantasy lawsuits will disappear just like pixie dust.
Let’s see, the blogs will employee constitutional scholars as their attorneys—attorneys who specialize in 1st Amendment issues. Only a fool who represents herself thinks she has sufficient money and assets to take on 1st Amendment attorneys.
You can’t afford to file a complaint, Kelley, let alone pay for attorney fees and subpoena service.
November 28th, 2009 at 2:39 am
Well, this clears up everything. According to Kelly, she and Phil are in this together—sit down and brace yourselves for this—because “after all, Rutger lost his fingers the same day (a few years apart) that Clarkson shot herself at his house and our karma is clearly intertwined.” Yes, Kelley, that clears up everything!
Only in your fantasy are Spector and Cohen intertwined with poor little ol’ you, you, you stuck in the middle. What’s that you say: Absolutely no one has come to your rescue. I wonder why.
Kelley, you continue to careen down the train track. We all know you’re headed for that big train wreck. Look in the mirror, Kelley, you have no one to blame but yourself. Afterall, you are the engineer, rear brakeman, and conductor. As you barrel down the track, you control your own destiny. Hopefully, after the crash, the only person you take out will be you. I think it’s safe to say we all pray your family survives your crash–a crash you purposely designed.
November 28th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Kelley, you do know the CA DOC does not allow prisoners access to materials taken, and/or printed, from the internet—don’t you? Even though the DOC does ban internet material, most likely, Spector’s attorneys told the prison to never, ever, ever allow any mailings from you to be delivered to their client—Spector. In addition, most sane people will believe Spector’s attorneys have put your name on the “unacceptable” visitors list. Yes, Kelley, attorneys have the power and authority to restrict mail and visitor access. Oh, I’ve got an idea, why don’t you demand Rochelle include your name on the visitors registry. I’m sure she’ll be only too happy to comply with an order from you.
November 28th, 2009 at 2:49 am
Kelley, the “evidence” you gave to the IRS was stolen from Leonard Cohen. Remember, the courts ordered you to return it to Cohen? Consequently, the IRS can’t use it against Cohen—fruit of the poisonous tree, and all.
You continue to proclaim everyone believes you and everyone agrees with you—yep, we’re the insane people; yet NOT ONE person has ever spoken out on your behalf. Not even on one of your many, many blogs. Kelley, it’s time to stick a fork in yourself. You’re done.
November 28th, 2009 at 3:06 am
Well, let’s see who our favorite lil’ name-dropper is including in todays rants and what she wants from them: Mick Brown; many Holy men; Sargent Joe, LAPD; Biggy Smalls; Dr. Dre; Eminem; P Diddy; VP Al Gore (perhaps the Secret Service will intervene); Ron Burkle; and Leon (TNR).
This is just too good—-after Kelley accuses Mick Brown of lying to her she suggests: “I also happen to believe, karmically, that you should write a new book addressing - honestly - the Karmapa issue with interviews by the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, and Lama Karma Wangchuk. That will, Mick, address the extremely negative karmic issues you have caused for yourself by lying and slandering people. Take my advice, Mick. It won’t kill you.” Sure, Kelley, Mick will be taking your advice. In addition, it takes a sick, truly sick, person to drag respected Holy men into your problems. And you claim to be a Buddhist?
Then there’s Sargent Joe, LAPD. Kelley wants us to believe that of all the people on the planet to share information with regarding the murder of Biggie Smalls, “Sergent Joe (LAPD) told her the LAPD hid evidence (a car and possibly a gun).” Sure Sergent Joe shared that info with you, only you—cuz you’re the only truth-teller on the planet.
Oh my, God! Now you want to drag Al Gore into this? Haven’t you done enough damage already, Kelley? Really, should anyone be surprised; you are, afterall, a name-dropper. How long have you been leaving messages for Leon at TNR? He’ll, most likely, never return your calls. Have you ever spoken to him? Probably not. Yet you try to engage him as an old friend who actually cares about you. Keep spamming him and keep leaving him voicemail messages. How long before you turn on him—afterall, you eventually turn on everyone.
And then there’s always good ol’ Boies Schiller. Give up the entire Boies Schiller fiasco, Kelley. The only time a reputable attorney will ever represent you is when you can prove, on a daily basis, you are clean, sane, and sober. When’s that going to happen, Kelley?
November 28th, 2009 at 3:18 am
The posting you stole from Blogonaut: KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON? While you did acknowledge from whom you stole the opinion piece, you’ve failed to publish that all –important phrase: “reprinted with permission of….” Until you provide proof of permission to re-print a posting, you’ve just stolen the work of others.
The article you stole from the San Fransisco Chronicle, written by Dennis Riordan, was not re-printed with the permission of the SFC. You can notify the author as many times as you want; however, the SFC is a copyright protected publication. As always, Kelley, Once a thief….
November 28th, 2009 at 3:23 am
Kelley, why don’t you just leave Mr. Riordan et al alone and let them determine the best strategy for Spector’s appeal? Give up the entire “instructional error by the trial court” shtick, Kelley. Don’t you remember, Riordan wrote the jury instructions. What’s Riordan going to argue to the courts: Gee, your honor, I improperly fashioned the jury instructions; therefore I provided ineffective assistance of counsel to Spector. Will you please give us another chance?
November 28th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM
subject Re: Dennis Riordan - Kelly Green Seems To Think You Provided Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel To Spector
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:41 AM (0 minutes ago)
P.S. Did you pay attention to Fidler’s revoked jury instructions? I did.
- Hide quoted text -
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the FBI and DOJ,
Kelly Green is quite focused on Phil Spector, his appeal, demeaning Dennis Riordan now, and attacking me. Why? Any thoughts from the men and/or women who are not my “pet” federal agents.
All the best,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Mr. Riordan,
Does Kelly Green know you? Someone’s concerned about your “strategies.” I have no idea what an “instruction error by the trial court shtick” is, Mr. Riordan.
Obviously this entire scenario relates to Phillip’s matters.
Of course, I know you wrote the jury instructions and recall your response to Fidler’s insane instructions (no doubt meant - intentionally - to change the jurors mind and attain a guilty verdict). I also recall that he revoked those instructions. That meant, to me, that Phillip - conceivably - could have been acquitted. Somehow, that seems like a huge issue. In fact, the United States Supreme Court might like to ponder that instruction and the handling of it. I know I would. And you did note that it was the first time in the annals of American jurisprudence which really caught my attention.
Mr. Riordan, Green is now belittling you. I see right through him (or her). You provided ineffective assistant of counsel to Phil Spector. How absurd is that?
Love,
Kelley
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:23 am
Kelley, why don’t you just leave Mr. Riordan et al alone and let them determine the best strategy for Spector’s appeal? Give up the entire “instructional error by the trial court” shtick, Kelley. Don’t you remember, Riordan wrote the jury instructions. What’s Riordan going to argue to the courts: Gee, your honor, I improperly fashioned the jury instructions; therefore I provided ineffective assistance of counsel to Spector. Will you please give us another chance?
November 28th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Dennis Riordan - I Have Been Accused Of Stealing Your Article From SF Chronicle
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:44 AM
subject Dennis Riordan - I Have Been Accused Of Stealing Your Article From SF Chronicle
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:44 AM (0 minutes ago)
Mr. Riordan,
Why is Kelly Green so interested in your article? You wrote it, didn’t you? These are not legal issues. There are no damages - they have been placed on a public internet and were previously published. Let Kelly Green sue me on behalf of the San Francisco Chronicle. I will subpoena you.
Phil Bronstein is copied in here.
Love,
Kelley
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:18 am
The posting you stole from Blogonaut: KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON? While you did acknowledge from whom you stole the opinion piece, you’ve failed to publish that all –important phrase: “reprinted with permission of….” Until you provide proof of permission to re-print a posting, you’ve just stolen the work of others.
The article you stole from the San Fransisco Chronicle, written by Dennis Riordan, was not re-printed with the permission of the SFC. You can notify the author as many times as you want; however, the SFC is a copyright protected publication. As always, Kelley, Once a thief….
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
P.S. Did you pay attention to Fidler’s revoked jury instructions? I did.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the FBI and DOJ,
Kelly Green is quite focused on Phil Spector, his appeal, demeaning Dennis Riordan now, and attacking me. Why? Any thoughts from the men and/or women who are not my “pet” federal agents.
All the best,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Mr. Riordan,
Does Kelly Green know you? Someone’s concerned about your “strategies.” I have no idea what an “instruction error by the trial court shtick” is, Mr. Riordan.
Obviously this entire scenario relates to Phillip’s matters.
Of course, I know you wrote the jury instructions and recall your response to Fidler’s insane instructions (no doubt meant - intentionally - to change the jurors mind and attain a guilty verdict). I also recall that he revoked those instructions. That meant, to me, that Phillip - conceivably - could have been acquitted. Somehow, that seems like a huge issue. In fact, the United States Supreme Court might like to ponder that instruction and the handling of it. I know I would. And you did note that it was the first time in the annals of American jurisprudence which really caught my attention.
Mr. Riordan, Green is now belittling you. I see right through him (or her). You provided ineffective assistant of counsel to Phil Spector. How absurd is that?
Love,
Kelley
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:23 am
Kelley, why don’t you just leave Mr. Riordan et al alone and let them determine the best strategy for Spector’s appeal? Give up the entire “instructional error by the trial court” shtick, Kelley. Don’t you remember, Riordan wrote the jury instructions. What’s Riordan going to argue to the courts: Gee, your honor, I improperly fashioned the jury instructions; therefore I provided ineffective assistance of counsel to Spector. Will you please give us another chance?
November 28th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
“LAPD Hid Evidence In The Biggie Smalls Matter” - Sergeant Joe (Now An Issue)
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM
subject “LAPD Hid Evidence In The Biggie Smalls Matter” - Sergeant Joe (Now An Issue)
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 9:49 AM (0 minutes ago)
Mr. Bronstein,
This gang of cyber-terrorists wants to silence everyone that speaks up and states anything about Phil Spectors’ innocence and/or Leonard Cohen’s potential prosecution for tax fraud - that I was told is criminal with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. They are desperate and vicious people who are now targeting my son Rutger and threatening him (Kelly Green - who may be a “lawyer” and may not be a woman but clearly has “motive”) with prison - over evidence I gave to the IRS with respect to Leonard Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud Matter. Leonard Cohen, according to Mick Brown/UK Telegraphy, may have testified against Phil Spector in his grand jury. I would conclude, if this is true, that he perjured himself. He is raised in the prosecution’s Motion In Limine and that is not “innocent” or “benign.”
Please email me directly if you have issues with my post on Phawker.com. I will ask Phawker.com to remove it. I cannot really see a problem.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
“This gang of cyber-terrorists wants to silence everyone that speaks up and states anything about Phil Spectors’ innocence ”
On the contrary, this blog was Phil Spector’s most prominent internet advocate during the retrial, and we posted scores of articles illustrating both the plausibility of Spector’s innocence, the unfair nature of the Trials and Tribulations blog coverage, and the unfair nature of the trial itself.
Us disagreeing with Kelley Lynch does not mean we are against Phil Spector. Nor does our disagreement with Ms. Lynch have anything to do with Phil Spector.
As much as Ms. Lynch would like to hitch her cause to Phil Spector she had noting to do with his prosecution or defense and neither did Leonard Cohen.
Nor does someone become a “terrorist” by disagreeing with Kelley Lynch.
November 28th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:01 AM
subject Re: “LAPD Hid Evidence In The Biggie Smalls Matter” - Sergeant Joe (Now An Issue)
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 10:01 AM (0 minutes ago)
Note: It means Green seems to be attempting to witness intimidate from my perspective.
- Hide quoted text -
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the FBI,
What does Green mean when it says I’m done? Any thoughts on that?
All the best,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
For the record, Kelly Green is a liar. I have said everyone I’ve spoken with agrees that it appears Phil Spector was set up; there should be federal investigations into that matter, the King Drew matter, etc; and, believes the IRS should be working on a federal prosecution of Cohen. They also believe Cohen may have obstructed justice and/or perjured himself in Phillip’s matter. Someone would have to review the grand jury testimony to determine if Mick Brown told the truth when he wrote me that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury. Mick Brown said he was in possession of the transcripts. If I haven’t spoken or emailed people and don’t know their opinions I do not intend to “speculate.”
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Since Kelly Green is also mentioning you, Mr. Riordan, I will subpoena you to stand to ask what the evidence against Cohen (submitted to the IRS) has to do with you and/or Phil Spector’s matters. Give that some thought. I, in the meantime, will call my friend Judge Marvin Katz. Marvin’s brilliant.
Love,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS,
Nothing was stolen from Leonard Cohen but this issue is a huge issue - from my perspective - as was Kelly Green’s threat of prison directed at Rutger. Kelly Green will have to sue the IRS for the evidence in order to present it in a court of law on behalf of Leonard Cohen. I am calling a friend of mine this week. His name is Marvin Katz and he is a federal judge in Philadelphia. I helped him settle his Mother’s estate when I was quite young and know him quite well. I’ll let him know that my son has been threatened and Kelly Green thinks the IRS can’t use evidence against Cohen. Well, Leonard Cohen would not be able to destroy the evidence (originals) in his possession would he? In any event, the Sheriff’s Department “seized” everything. I scanned and emailed the IRS copies. The IRS can always subpoena this. I hope this isn’t Cohen’s defense but I have a feeling it is.
Here’s a quote of Mr. Rob Watts/State of Kentucky: “Send me everything you sent the IRS.”
Kelly Green can sue me on behalf of Cohen and I will absolutely subpoena the IRS Commissioner himself to the witness stand. In fact, I will subpoena former Commissioner Mark Everson, former Acting Commissioner Linda Stiff, and the present IRS Commissioner Mark Shulman.
I will privately let you know what Marvin Katz has to say about the threat against Rutger.
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:49 am
Kelley, the “evidence” you gave to the IRS was stolen from Leonard Cohen. Remember, the courts ordered you to return it to Cohen? Consequently, the IRS can’t use it against Cohen—fruit of the poisonous tree, and all.
You continue to proclaim everyone believes you and everyone agrees with you—yep, we’re the insane people; yet NOT ONE person has ever spoken out on your behalf. Not even on one of your many, many blogs. Kelley, it’s time to stick a fork in yourself. You’re done.
November 28th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Green, Nona Banks wrote on my behalf and mentioned that she thought you were lunatics. Gianelli-Blogonaut commented on that. This is how people in the “real world” feel about this situation and who I - and my family - are being targeted by. Let me quote my Mother: They’re nuts. But, she thought I was exposed to potentially dangerous and unstable people which is precisely why the FBI is copied in on my emails. They personally told me to let the IRS take the lead and they would be brought in if there was witness and/or evidence tampering. I believe the remarks about the evidence against Cohen are an attempt to “evidence tamper.” The FBI can decide for themselves. They told me it was criminal and the Agent appeared to know what he was talking about. Neal Greenberg’s lawyer wrote me that he has evidence against Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon - that may relate to Greenberg’s allegation in his lawsuit (now public record in Denver) that they conspired to have me falsely arrested.
Any thoughts on who Boies Schiller thought might take the fall in Los Angeles for what happened to me? We were emailing about Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; were permitted to review three huge boxes of evidence - that were then given to Bert Deixler for a bit; and some issues about Phil Spector (including my transcript of my conversation with Janis Zavala Spector where we determined that the DA was lying about witnesses we knew. Janis read me the Motion in Limine. Cohen has been raised in that Motion.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Kelly Green, why not join the rest of us on Blogonaut’s web site at http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/11/kelley-lynchphil-spector-friend-or.html. Best part about it? Kelley is banned…
November 28th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Dr. Dre, Biggie Smalls matter, Eminem, Ron Burkle, Karmapa, Sharmapa, and Mick Brown
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:50 AM
subject Dr. Dre, Biggie Smalls matter, Eminem, Ron Burkle, Karmapa, Sharmapa, and Mick Brown
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 10:50 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Rand, the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko,
Unfortunately, Dr. Dre was dragged into Ray’s custody matter as was Ron Burkle - by Steven Clark Lindsey. He was also used as a negotiating matter when I was being threatened with jail by Lindsey and Bergman - for my emails that are now of record in that matter, will be handed over to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Phil Spector, and his legal team. Lindsey has gone to great lengths for Leonard Cohen. Sergeant Joe/LAPD (who discussed the evidence in the Biggie Smalls matter with me) has been raised - below - as an issue.
You are Business Affairs/Aftermath. I have not name dropped Eminem. I used his lyrics and I wrote you about that specifically. They are going to appear in a legal document and I will pay royalties to Eminem for graciously permitting me to use his live version of “Puke” - dedicated to Mariah Carey. I dedicated it to Pat Dixon. Assure Eminem that I don’t have sexual fantasies about Dixon.
I haven’t stated that I want anything from VP Al Gore or Leon Wieseltier (TNR). David Boies represented Al Gore and I referenced that. It was a key issue for my lawyers. They even wrote me about that. Leon Wieseltier knows me and must wonder why Cohen would target me this viciously, destroy my life, and have his lawyer file a Declaration in my son’s custody matter after he witnessed a conversation about Cohen’s tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. These are acts of desperation - as was, from my perspective, the offer of 50% community property. Dale Burgess witnessed that and told me to tell the IRS/Treasury Agents he would testify to that fact and wanted me to advise them that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud. I am not sure why that last point was raised by Dale Burgess but he does. He was an IRS Agent who told me I should be in the witness protection program, believes (as did Ken Cleveland) there is a pending IRS matter, that he will receive a subpoena, and witnessed a tremendous amount with respect to what was going on with DiMascio & Berardo, Robert Kory, and others - including Kevin Prins/Moss Adams. That is probably why Dale Burgess, my former accountant, faxed DiMascio & Berardo about the “ledger” they and Kory apparently didn’t want a copy of (I have no idea why) and the assets, back-up documentation that was missing from that ledger. That ledger, utterly fraudulent, appears in Cohen’s bogus lawsuit in Los Angeles. It is evidence of perjury and obstruction of justice from my perspective and explains why Cohen personally flew into Boulder, Colorado in an attempt to silence me. I had been asking for, among other things, a complete and proper forensic accounting. He did not want me to communicate with Robert Kory.
This may be why the Duty Agent/FBI, who seemed extremely intelligent and extremely professional told me this was taking place all across the country. That is precisely what I thought and that is precisely why I have contacted and met with the Los Angeles FBI and discussed the LAPD “wrongful arrest,” the Denver FBI, the New Jersey FBI, the Houston FBI, and the Washington Bureau of the FBI. Robert Mueller himself might wonder what the hell is going on here. And, let’s not forget that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark dragged Special Agent Wynar/Oakland into this matter - which relates to Phil Spector and Cohen. Gianelli-Blogonaut has posted what appears to be a defense (lame) on Phawker which I will address shortly.
Rand, I think Dr. Dre is aware that I have no choice but to subpoena him. I don’t know that I want anything from P. Diddy but I want him to know what Sergeant Joe/LAPD told me and I want Violetta Wallace and Faith Hall to know also. They have lost their son, husband, and friend and Sean Combs was present for that murder. I always thought of him when I drove past the spot on Wilshire. I have met Dr. Dre and know he is a decent human being and a serious man. I don’t think he wanted to be dragged into this matter and I understand that he has had a terrible tragedy as well. Phil Spector also lost his son, who I knew, and I cannot imagine what it is like to witness a woman shoot herself at your house and then end up (an innocent man) in prison. I think Dr. Dre would have done the same thing that I’ve done. Stood loyally by a friend who has been targeted by corrupt government and corrupt cops (as the 14th Sharmapa - who I will not be addressing with Kelly Green, Gianelli-Blogonaut - suggested). I personally felt that the information Sergeant Joe/LAPD (who monitored my visit with Ray) told me endangered, needlessly, my life. I have read a great deal about the Biggie Smalls/Tupac Shakur murders (believe they are related) and know that FBI agents felt their lives were endangered with Death Row Records and others. Why this man would tell me this was inconceivably bizarre and extremely reckless. In any event, I decided to bring it to the attention of the appropriate authorities - including the Department of Justice - and have made it public. Sergeant Joe/LAPD apparently has information that someone might want to discuss with him. That is all I will say about the matter because that is all I know.
For the record, I do believe Sharmapa has addressed many many points (publicly) with Mick Brown and I personally believe the best way for Mick Brown to handle the situation is to write a book addressing everything he has now learned and that has been brought to his attention. Much of that is documented at www.karmapa-issue.org and I know that my teacher and friend, the 14th Sharmapa, did not mind my posting some of the letters on Michelle Blaine’s Blog. He may not like the Karmapa being demeaned in any way whatsoever. I wrote Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche because I do not like any attacks on his Father, Thinley Norbu Rinpoche, and think what he has witnessed is ugly and vicious. Rinpoche will comment when he feels it is appropriate - according to what his student wrote me. The 14th Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, Lama Karma Wangchuk - and others, have accused Mick Brown of lying. I have said that if Kelly Green, Gianelli-Blogonaut, et al. are correct (that Cohen did not testify against Phil Spector in his grand jury) than it would follow that Mick Brown (who emailed me about this - and those emails were forwarded to Iris Keitel/Abkco Records who was managing Phillip and who is a friend of mine as were many many documents) lied when he emailed me on more than one occasion that Leonard Cohen testified against Phil Spector in his secret grand jury. I have also stated, publicly, that I can’t imagine why Mick Brown would lie to me about this. I didn’t drag Thinley Norbu Rinpoche, Karmapa, Sharmapa, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, and other lamas, into this. Thinley Norbu Rinpoche was asked to protect me by His Holiness Kusum Lingpa. They have witnessed this and Kelly Green does not and never will speak for me and/or them or their perspectives. I am aware that Thinley Norbu Rinpoche feared for my welfare and wanted me to relax. I am aware that Karmapa, Sharmapa, and Jigme Rinpoche have read my emails. Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche visited me and witnessed what was going on - including the fact that His Holiness Kusum Lingpa was extremely concerned about what I was going through. That is all I will say at this time on that “matter” and I realize that my witnesses are subject to slander, malicious gossip, etc. I would assume they are too - and that includes Ron Burkle who has a former secret service agent, fortunately, protecting him.
Sergeant Joe/LAPD shared this information with me and it is entirely possible that Ray heard his remarks but I cannot say for certain. I know Sergeant Joe/LAPD told Ray not to go to rap awards. He felt they could potentially become violent.
I have never stated that David Boies and/or Boies Schiller have represented me, will represent me, or that I want them to represent me. I do not. I have stated, clearly, that Boies Schiller arranged my meetings and/or conversations with Zia Modabber (through Alan Friedman) and Bert Deixler and Terry Bird (through James Mercer). Apparently John Cove made those recommendations - pursuant to what Norman Posel/Boies Schiller wrote and/or told me. John Cove can and will speak for himself - on the witness stand. The same is true for David Boies who understood this was a tax matter and probably understood why Posel wrote me that Cohen was attempting to blame his wrongdoing on me. He might understand why Posel questioned why Leonard Cohen made me an enemy - that would be based on a review of three huge boxes of evidence that is (for the most part) with the IRS. Agent Sopko confirmed that they were in receipt of my emails, items I sent through the U.S. mail, and - actually - the emails they received regarding my issues and the Cohen Criminal Tax Fraud Matter (my moniker) from others. The IRS also received the t-shirts I sent them. I wore the “Rock Royalty” t-shirt Thomas gave me to my meeting with Robert Kory and Superfon gave me the “vicodin” t-shirt. Irrelevant evidence apparently. I personally thought they were of interest, however. Not sure what IRS Commissioner Mark Everson thought. I know what John Barry dictated to me (for Mark Everson) as I was emailing the IRS Commissioner. I also know just how much attention IRS Commissioner Mark Everson received in Santa Monica - particularly from Officers Rogozik (who I refer to as “Officer Robodick”) and Arnold, etc.
No. There is absolutely no need to drag Al Gore into this. Lindsey, however, attempted to drag Ron Burkle’s friend (former President of the United States Bill Clinton) into this by filing an email that referenced Ron and President Clinton. I have no idea why. President Clinton didn’t witness anything but he is Ron’s friend and Ray had a “sleep over” with him at Ron’s house. Lindsey knows this. Ron was gracious enough to give us photographs and a letter from one of President Clinton’s employees on official letterhead. I thought that was quite thoughtful and reminds me that Ron Burkle is one of the classiest men on this planet and a true gentleman.
I will not speak for Leon Wieseltier. I doubt Green knows Leon. I do. I refuse to address with this stranger whether or not Leon has phoned me or whether or not we have spoken and/or communicated since I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS. Leon is going to have to address Green’s allegation that I am “spamming” him, however.
All the best,
Kelley
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:06 am
Well, let’s see who our favorite lil’ name-dropper is including in todays rants and what she wants from them: Mick Brown; many Holy men; Sargent Joe, LAPD; Biggy Smalls; Dr. Dre; Eminem; P Diddy; VP Al Gore (perhaps the Secret Service will intervene); Ron Burkle; and Leon (TNR).
This is just too good—-after Kelley accuses Mick Brown of lying to her she suggests: “I also happen to believe, karmically, that you should write a new book addressing - honestly - the Karmapa issue with interviews by the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, and Lama Karma Wangchuk. That will, Mick, address the extremely negative karmic issues you have caused for yourself by lying and slandering people. Take my advice, Mick. It won’t kill you.” Sure, Kelley, Mick will be taking your advice. In addition, it takes a sick, truly sick, person to drag respected Holy men into your problems. And you claim to be a Buddhist?
Then there’s Sargent Joe, LAPD. Kelley wants us to believe that of all the people on the planet to share information with regarding the murder of Biggie Smalls, “Sergent Joe (LAPD) told her the LAPD hid evidence (a car and possibly a gun).” Sure Sergent Joe shared that info with you, only you—cuz you’re the only truth-teller on the planet.
Oh my, God! Now you want to drag Al Gore into this? Haven’t you done enough damage already, Kelley? Really, should anyone be surprised; you are, afterall, a name-dropper. How long have you been leaving messages for Leon at TNR? He’ll, most likely, never return your calls. Have you ever spoken to him? Probably not. Yet you try to engage him as an old friend who actually cares about you. Keep spamming him and keep leaving him voicemail messages. How long before you turn on him—afterall, you eventually turn on everyone.
And then there’s always good ol’ Boies Schiller. Give up the entire Boies Schiller fiasco, Kelley. The only time a reputable attorney will ever represent you is when you can prove, on a daily basis, you are clean, sane, and sober. When’s that going to happen, Kelley?
November 28th, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Leon Wieseltier - Kelly Green’s Allegation That I Have “Spammed” You
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:02 AM
subject Leon Wieseltier - Kelly Green’s Allegation That I Have “Spammed” You
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:02 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Leon,
I’ve always viewed you as unusually brilliant. Do you know Kelly Green and can “it” (not sure if it’s a man or a woman yet) make these allegations on your behalf? I don’t think so. Please email me publicly if you feel I have spammed you.
Take care, Leon. This situation is so ugly and vicious - and this is who Cohen is, Leon. This is Cohen unveiled. I know. I studied him, carefully, for 20 years and became increasingly alarmed by his aggression, control issues, paranoia about others, hostility towards others - including people who thought they were close to him, his greed, disdain for income taxes and gift taxes, ego-maniacal tendencies, and his interest in looking at people defecate on one another on the internet in front of me. That was disgraceful and revolting. I have nothing to say about Freda Guttman’s remark to Ann Diamond that Lorca Cohen publicly declared that her father molested her. She used heroin so perhaps that explains it. Or, perhaps she told the truth. I cannot say. I know this, however, Leon - he hated Phil Spector for “drowning” his vocals. He hated Steven Clark Lindsey and was jealous of him. He hated my children and was jealous of Rutger - I witnessed this the night I brought Rutger to an interview with Cohen at “my office.” I witnessed him tell Rutger, on his 9th birthday, that something amazing happened in his 9th year - his “father died” and found that to be malicious. He is cold hearted and mean. Paul Burger told Cohen that the “psalms” in Book of Mercy were cold and I believe that is why he turned on Paul Burger. He had nothing but disdain for Moses Znaimer but liked to talk to him about Rutger - which was and remains none of his business. Moses is aware that I told him all issues were between him and Rutger. Period. The reason this scenario is so ugly and vile is because it is indicative of who Cohen really is. He thinks he sees right through people. In fact, I always thought he used you for information about “the Bible” and Judaism. He studies people and he absolutely studied serial murderers. His Holiness Kusum Lingpa studied him and I shall now quote him: He’s an asshole who is going to hell. Cohen dragged Oliver Stone and Richard Rutowski into this by going into Steven Clark Lindsey’s office, with Robert Kory, and accusing me of having sex with them. I did not have sex with Oliver Stone or Richard Rutowski and they will be asked to testify to that. Oliver Stone (who I know and who hired my nephew through marriage to Douglas Penick who was Trungpa Rinpoche’s brother-in-law and is an utterly brilliant man and wonderful Father to Rutger - Gesar Mukpo - who lived downstairs from Cohen with Lorca Cohen) might wonder why Cohen was addressing this at the precise time I was meeting with and talking to my accountant and legal representatives about the fact that they concluded Cohen used me as an unwitting pawn and exposed me to criminal tax fraud. I have no idea why DiMascio & Berardo wanted to figure in a settlement for that exposure but I believe it would have been illegal. I believe the offer (in front of witnesses, Leon) of 50% community property is a classic “bribe.” I discussed this with Agent Sopko and her partner Brandon.
In any event, email me publicly if you feel I am spamming you. I will post that on Phawker.com for Kelly Green to review. It appears to be a lawyer who is insulting Dennis Riordan and raising very very important issues from my perspective - it just doesn’t see them.
Love,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
Bradley Gage - Christopher Wallace Wrongful Death Matter
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
bgage@goldbergandgage.com,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:19 AM
subject Bradley Gage - Christopher Wallace Wrongful Death Matter
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:19 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Bradley,
How are you? Sergeant Joe/LAPD’s comments regarding the evidence LAPD “hid” are now on Phawker.com. You might want to take a look at them. I have no idea who Kelly Green is but I can assure you that she is all over the Phil Spector matter and Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. It has threatened my son with “prison” relating to evidence I supplied the IRS and others. I have asked the IRS and FBI to send agents to meet with me, Rutger, interview Ray, and speak to Rutger’s father, my sister and her husband, and my parents - immediately. I want the IRS and FBI agents to take custody of the copies of documents I now personally have stored in a very very safe place. Perhaps the Houston FBI would like to meet with me since Gianelli-Blogonaut has monitored my activity in Houston and has publicly lied that I fled or went to Mexico. I did not and the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko-Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan know precisely where I am. People are now concerned about my welfare - including Director Black of the Star of Hope who raised this as an issue after drawing conclusions (accurate) about what has happened here. He knows for a fact that I have been targeted by liars.
Here’s the link, Bradley:
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214239
You represent Violetta Wallace and Faith Hall. For the record, and I have asked Rand Hoffman to address this with Dr. Dre and Ron Burkle to address it with Sean Combs: Sergeant Joe/LAPD - who monitored my visit with Ray in July 2005 - told me in no uncertain terms that LAPD hid a car (and possibly a gun - I am almost certain he said a gun but may have said a weapon and I do not want to speculate about this “deadly serious” matter) somewhere in South Central (I believe) that relates to the Biggie Smalls murder. He recklessly endangered my life by telling me that. That is my opinion. After all, Detective Poole and others have concluded that LAPD murdered both Biggie Smalls and Tupac Shakur and that is now a huge civil matter - that should be criminal. LAPD is all over my story and even, from my perspective, send Boulder PD into my office. They apparently didn’t like the fact that I attempted to contact “Officer Maurice Hampton” and/or “Erma Oppenhein” who dragged me to Killer King and questioned me about Phil Spector. My friend John Barry thought (and told Rutger) Ray and I were legally “kidnapped.” I believe that as well. Chris/Homeland Security thought the District Attorney and/or Governor’s ofice might be behind much of what I explained to him. I agree. David Moorhead though the Los Angeles District Attorney had the power and motive to drag me to Killer King and question me about Phil Spector - unless the cops acted on their own. I doubt that. What’s their motive? They may be foot soldiers for the thugs at Los Angeles District Attorney’s office.
Investigator William Frayeh and Alan Jackson are copied in on these emails. I have reported Sergeant Joe/LAPD’s comments to OIG and others. It is a disgraceful and ugly story and I wish Violetta Wallace and Faith Evans the very best and believe they will ultimately prevail. They are courageous woman who have done what I believe the DOJ and FBI should do - investigate this matter and prosecute the parties involved. Perhaps they are following the civil matter. I know I would be if I were Attorney General Eric Holder.
Have a great day, Bradley. I am now removing you from my emails because the other details - while they may be of interest (and frightening) - are not really relative to you. I am now being accused of spamming Agent Sopko (who is copied in here) of the Treasury and a man who I believe is dead set on undermining me as a witness in a potential federal criminal matter and derailing that matter has contacted Agent Wynar/FBI about that. I think he’s attempting to determine, through Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar, precisely what “the feds” (one of whom has now been called my “pet” publicly so draw your own conclusions) have “pending.” In other words, he lied to the FBI about my spamming the Treasury and Agent Sopko has never once asked to be removed from my emalis. She did, however, fly into meet with me about Cohen’s tax fraud and sent me to Agent Luis Tejeda/IRS Fraud Unit Los Angeles which I don’t think was all that “innocent.” We are talking about criminal activity. The IRS Commissioner’s Staff, according to Agent Wynar and her partner, are reading my emails. Agent Tejeda is aware that I had copies of documents in storage in Los Angeles as well as other personal items. Do you think Rutger can go to prison for that, Bradley? That’s what “Kelly Green” has publicly stated. My friend, Nona, thinks I have been targeted by “lunatics” and emailed me. She knows I am documenting this for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector and his legal teams. And she knows for a fact that this is not spam. She addressed a key issue - that she views these people as lunatics and confirmed that she knows me and thinks I’m wonderful. I think she’s amazing and I know for a fact that she is an extraordinary Mother.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
For the record, that is correct - I had nothing to do with Phil Spector’s prosecution. I did, however, meet with Investigator Brian Bennett and have spoken with him, Investigator William Frayeh, and met with Investigator John Thompson (who told me I was “probably a witness” in that matter) and Detective Silva. Apparently Investigator Thompson continues to investigate something that involves me. That is what Investigator Frayeh told me and wanted me to speak to Investigator Thompson. I didn’t want to speak to him. This was the conversation where Investigator Frayeh told me Pat Dixon was good looking. That comment made me want to puke. Literally. You personally have stated that Dixon was talking to Bruce Cutler about me and I want details of that - since I was not involved with either trial. It does not make sensed based on your so-called arguments.
Leonard Cohen appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine. Was he just thrown into the mix for fun or is it an attempt to prove that Phil Spector has a pattern of holding guns on people - that has been used as prior bad acts in the Phil Spector matter? If so, anything to do with Cohen is important including the fact that Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that he was in possession of the grand jury testimony and stated that Cohen testified against Phillip. I cannot imagine why he would lie. Please contact Sharmapa via www.karmapa-issue.org regarding any issues that involve him, personally, and Mick Brown. He has made those issues public as Mick Brown knows. Mick Brown and I have discussed, at length, our positions on the Karmapa controversy and the unbelievable political scandal that Karmapa has found himself involved with in this lifetime. Unfortunately, Karmapa, Sharmapa, Thinley Norbu Rinpoche, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche - who are my teachers and friends - have had to witness this utterly revolting situation. That would include the fact that Rutger was threatened, by Kelly Green, with “prison” over documents that have been given to the IRS. I want an IRS and FBI agent to meet with me now and take command of the evidence. They are photocopies. They will know where to find the originals and they will know what exists. They are evidence that I believe will be used in a federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen for tax fraud and other criminal acts and I am convinced, personally, that a matter is pending.
I am also convinced that you contacted Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar to determine is such a prosecution is pending and view you as someone who is blatantly witness tampering and attempting to derail said potential prosecution. You have also stated that you contacted Alan Jackson and Investigator Frayeh - who are related to Phil Spector’s matters and you publicly stated that Pat Dixon fears for his life with respect to me. Pat Dixon should get over himself. I could care less about Pat Dixon, think he looks vicious, believe he helped set up Phil Spector, want to know why he was discussing me, and ought to hire legal counsel. If you or Kelly Green are any indication of “their” legal issues, all I have to say is “good luck, you’re going to need it.” People view you as lunatics and you, personally, Gianelli as someone unbelievably obsessed with me and my son Rutger. You also seem fixated on my sister, her husband, and Douglas Penick who you are now referring to as “Doug.” That is preposterous. I can assure you that Douglas Penick and his brother, Van Penick, take all threats about Rutger and possible prison deadly seriously as do I.
That is correct. You are not a terrorist because you have disagreed with me. This is an obvious and calculated campaign to terrorize my family and friends. You are lying about me and my son. You have slandered me. You are monitoring my physical whereabouts and publicly lied that I fled to Mexico. You and/or Belark have contacted Boulder PD about me and my son Rutger. The lengths you have gone to witness tamper and target us is inconceivable. This has everything to do with Phil Spector’s matter and Cohen’s tax fraud. You yourself inserted yourself into it and you yourself publicly stated that you were in touch with Cohen’s advisers and my former friends. I have advised you not to destroy any evidence relating to this and I have advised Jackson not to destroy any evidence of his communications with you and people I feel have targeted me on the internet with motive: to undermine my credibility as a witness. That would work for Alan Jackson and maybe that’s why Investigator Frayeh felt you found a sympathetic ear with Jackson. Trust me - I know Phil Spector. These are incredibly serious issues as is the fact that you lied to the FBI when you stated that I was/am spamming Agent Sopko-the Treasury who you do not speak for. You are, however, insulting her by calling her my “pet” federal agent. I see right through you. I am praying that you will be investigated, charged, arrested, and prosecuted for what I view as “federal crimes.” That’s why I am documenting everything you and others are saying on these Blogs and others.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
“This gang of cyber-terrorists wants to silence everyone that speaks up and states anything about Phil Spectors’ innocence ”
On the contrary, this blog was Phil Spector’s most prominent internet advocate during the retrial, and we posted scores of articles illustrating both the plausibility of Spector’s innocence, the unfair nature of the Trials and Tribulations blog coverage, and the unfair nature of the trial itself.
Us disagreeing with Kelley Lynch does not mean we are against Phil Spector. Nor does our disagreement with Ms. Lynch have anything to do with Phil Spector.
As much as Ms. Lynch would like to hitch her cause to Phil Spector she had noting to do with his prosecution or defense and neither did Leonard Cohen.
Nor does someone become a “terrorist” by disagreeing with Kelley Lynch.
November 28th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
“And just who is David Moorhead?”
He is a criminal defense attorney in Boulder Colorado who Kelley Lynch consulted with regarding her legal difficulties there.
She quotes Moorhead’s alleged “opinion” from time to time to that effect that Phil Spector has a good issue on appeal relating to Leonard Cohen’s alleged perjury in Spector’s “secret grand jury proceedings”. Moorhead is not licensed in California, and we doubt he gave her that “advice”.
In this state at least any irregularities that allegedly result in the indictment or information must be raised before trial or are waived.
No California appellate case recognizes witness perjury as the basis to set aside an indictment, no motion was made by Phil Spector to set aside the indictment, and any review of any such legal issue must be sought by pretrial writ. The issue would not be cognizable on an appeal from a judgment of conviction–which is based on the TRIAL EVIDENCE and not what occurred at the preliminary hearing or in the grand jury proceedings before the indictment or information was even filed.
Of course, Lynch refuses to accept this well established California law, because to do so would be to admit that neither she nor Leonard Cohen have anything to do with Phil Spector’s appeal.
November 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Ms> Lynch:
You have not idea what I told the FBI–let alone whether it was knowingly false (it was not).
November 28th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:42 AM
subject Re: Kelley Would Like The IRS And FBI To Take Custody Of The Documents In Her Possession
P.S. I think the “chain of evidence” at this time is crucial.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS and FBI,
I do think agents should meet with me and take custody and command of the photocopies I have and am now reviewing. I do not believe all of these documents were given to the IRS and feel that when Rutger is threatened with “prison” (over these documents) that they have now become a serious issue. I would expect to meet with someone this week and you know where I am. Director Black/Star of Hope has been advised that the Star of Hope may confirm - for the FBI - that I have been residing there since August. They graciously extended my time beyond 90 days and have gone to great lengths to assist me. I have nothing but utter respect for Edward Black.
All the best,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
To the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Agent Sopko, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan,
Please see Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest public post on Phawker and my response. I have not copied him in on these emails because I think his actions and words speak for themselves at this point. I know I see right through him. Fortunately, Nona Banks realized he was a lunatic who is lying about me. Why? Because Nona Banks knows me and knows - as do others - that Gianelli-Blogonaut is lying about me, slandering me, and appears to be unbelievably obsessed with me and my whereabouts. That is why the Houston FBI is now being copied in on these emails.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
Investigator William Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:45 AM
subject Investigator William Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:45 AM (1 minute ago)
Hello,
I am now removing you from my emails. Just wanted you to know that Rutger has been threatened with prison over evidence - relating to Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal. That’s probably why the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life.
Mr. Pavelic, I want you personally to take note of the fact that the “lunatic” who has targeted my family is attempting to take cover behind you.
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
“I want an IRS and FBI agent to meet with me now and take command of the evidence. They are photocopies. They will know where to find the originals and they will know what exists. They are evidence that I believe will be used in a federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen for tax fraud and other criminal acts and I am convinced, personally, that a matter is pending.”
Almost 5 years later, you are just getting around to turning over this evidence now?
I thought you laid it out chapter and verse four and a half years ago?
No, you really want the opportunity to quiz the IRS about whether your report of alleged “tax fraud” will EVER bear fruit and if so when.
The IRS has a firm policy of not commenting on pending investigations, or even if an investigation is pending or has been closed. So you are out-of-luck.
Of course, they also know that anything they say to you at this point will be instantly published on the world-wide-web.
November 28th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
They may or may not know that anything they say to me will be instantly published on the world-wide-web. What I know is that it won’t be published until it becomes a public matter and a legal prosecution which is what I (and you) think is going to happen. You have now conceded that the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Agent-Sopko are reading my emails evidently. One would assume the same is true for Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan since their client is innocent and now in prison. And, I have noted - for Mr. Riordan - the legal issues Kelly Green has raised, the legal issues you have raised, the threats relating to my family and me, and the lunacy that you and the other “lunatics” (as Nona Banks noticed) who have targeted me are spewing on the world-wide web “intentionally” and blatantly. I am, as I just discussed with Rutger when we talked about your emails to him, documenting this matter and these lies and he knows that I want the IRS and FBI to take custody and command of the evidence I have in my possession - immediately. If need be I will go into the IRS by myself and drop the evidence off. I think that’s inappropriate at this time and believe the IRS and FBI should send agents to sit down with me; to sit down with Rutger; to interview Ray at this time; and to call my parents, sister and her husband, and Douglas Penick.
I have stated, publicly - and you are reading these comments so don’t deny it - that I have provided the IRS with a tremendous amount of evidence. I faxed evidence to Bruce Cutler. He confirmed that for you. I faxed evidence to Abkco Records - they were Phil Spector’s managers. I mailed Phil Spector evidence and sent him six boxes of materials - including some things I viewed as evidence. I mailed Phil Spector Robert Kory’s Declaration in Ray’s custody matter and Betsy Superfon’s Declaration in Ray’s custody matter with my shorthand notes recording our conversation about her “allegations” as they relate to him. And I have photocopies of documents (as does Dale Burgess - who also copied and mailed me documents … some of them were faxed to Bruce Cutler) in my possession that I am reviewing now and want the IRS to have them. I do not know if they have every single piece of evidence buit I do know that Major Brunk and others willfully destroyed evidence and I know that it is a crime. It is called “spoilation.” I know the Sheriff’s Department illegally seized documents based on lies and perjury.
I have laid nothing out “chapter and verse.” I paid the taxes Dale Burgess told me to pay and when I did that I advised Agent Betzer that I felt I was dragged into tax fraud - relating to the entities he was aware of: Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and LC Investments, LLC. He told me to hire an attorney and bring it into the IRS in that manner. I now understand why. He told me to go get what was rightfully mine - 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and/or the intellectual property. Why do you think he didn’t include LC Investments, LLC? Because I was not a partner but was issued illegal K1s in the State of Kentucky and directly to the IRS (bypassing me because while Kory, et al., knew where I was they didn’t mail them to me which is probably also illegal).
I don’t want to quiz the IRS about anything. I want to sit down and speak with IRS agents and FBI agents about Cohen’s tax fraud matter that i was told is criminal, what I believe is going on with me and my family (being targeted, threatened itself) - particularly as it relates to Phil Spector’s matter, and I want them to immediately take custody and command of the evidence you are raising as an issue on the internet. I have brought Kelly Green’s threat relating to Rutger to their attention.
If the IRS has a firm policy of not commenting on pending investigations (which I am aware of - the State of Kentucky, according to Rob Watts, has the same policy - although I was encouraged to send him everything I sent the IRS and asked to put my view of what happened in writing for him which I attempted to do and believe successfully did … Agent Sopko’s partner, Brandon, asked me to do the same thing. For the record, Brandon is not my “pet” federal agent either. You are stating, for the record, that the IRS does not divulge what is pending and yet intentionally attacking me, lying about me, and slandering me. You contacted Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar in order to determine what was pending. You will never convince me otherwise. If Agent Wynar or Agent Sopko fell for your insanity then they should not work for the FBI and/or Treasury. People who are not investigators have figured this situation out and they are not trained but they know I have been targeted by lunatics and liars - like yourself. Did you like hearing that Investigator William Frayeh noted - to me personally - that he views you as a “shady character?” I happen to believe that Investigator Frayeh is a very very intelligent man and informed him that while we are in adversarial positions vis a vis the Phil Spector matter I appreciate his professionalism. He assured me, in writing, that he was reading my emails, had been removed from the Spector matter (naturally), and personally gave copies of my letter to Alan Jackson, Truc Do, and Steve Cooley - as I asked him to do. That letter contains very serious issues - and relates to your communications with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson and your contacts with Agent Wynar, Agent Sopko, Investigator Frayeh (about his remark that Dixon’s good looking), and your public allegations that Pat Dixon fears for his life, etc. Pat Dixon ought to get a life. He should also get a lawyer because I intend to find out why Bruce Cutler told you that he and Pat Dixon were discussing me. I believe this will be a crucial issue for Phil Spector.
I have informed, via email, Bill Pavelic that you are attempting to take cover behind him. I have informed him and Investigator Frayeh that Rutger has been threatened. The situation is vile and nauseating. I have asked Bradley Gage, who represents Violetta Wallace and Faith Evans, to take a look at Kelly Green’s comments regarding the Biggie Smalls wrongful death matter - that I brought to the attention of Bradley Gage previously (and heard back from him immediately, I might note), OIG, and others - including the Department of Justice who should be monitoring the civil matter. It relates to execution style murders and, according to Detective Russell Poole who quit the police force over this lunacy, egregious and deadly serious issues involving LAPD who is all over my story and who Bill Pavelic publicly alleged set up him, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden in the Phil Spector matter in retaliation for the OJ trial.
As I stated above - good luck. You’re going to need it.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
David Moorhead
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:58 AM
subject David Moorhead
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 11:58 AM (49 minutes ago)
Hi David,
Why do you think Blogonaut/Gianelli is now interested in you? Not only did you tell me that you thought the District Attorney of Los Angeles had the power and motive to take me to King Drew (unless the cops acted on their own - which is preposterous), you told me that you felt Kory was behind the incident where Officer Storbeck rolled into Deneuve Construction after I attempted to leave a message with “Officer Garrin/LAPD.” This may have been purely speculative. I don’t think I’ll address anything with Gianelli-Blogonaut (who is obsessed with me, David) about who you are. I know who you are. I don’t think this was your “alleged” opinion. I know it was your opinion. I see you really hit a pertinent legal issue - if Cohen perjured himself in Phil Spector’s matter (Mick Brown, who was in possession of the transcripts, wrote me that he did) and issues relating to Cohen were raised in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine (they were) - Leonard Cohen is an issue that needs to be addressed in the Phil Spector matter.
You told me you felt Rutger, personally, might be a material witness for Phil Spector. I asked you to explain perjury and testimony to Rutger because I wanted him to be clear about the legal concepts. You met with us and I thank you, again, for that. I suppose you’re not entitled to your personal opinions, David. You’re in Colorado where Bruce Cutler (according to what you thought) would not have been blind-sided in opening arguments? Why - that particular “law” in California doesn’t work in Colorado? That tells me it is a federal issue now.
Blogonaut-Gianelli has his own views on legal matters but has no problem - whatsoever, lying to the FBI, slandering me (an absolute stranger), contacting parties who have prosecuted Phil Spector, communicating with Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers and my former friends (who don’t exist … they were not friends and no longer know me and wouldn’t know me if they fell over me), and it goes on and on and on. My friend, Jim Meale - an attorney (Chicago and Florida) - felt the issues with Cohen, his tax matters, and - in particular the Killer King situation with respect to me and Phil Spector were incredibly serious legal issues. He felt that Phil Spector should address them and he felt that I should. He and his wife, a guardian ad litem in Florida, believe Los Angeles is incredibly corrupt. They also believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is reading these emails and have said I am a witness. They too know people have lied about me and, being grandparents, understand that my parents have suffered with respect to the fact that Lindsey refuses to let them see their grandson. They are aware that Leonard Cohen’s lawyer (who does not know Ray - at all) filed a Declaration in that matter.
Take a look at the vile lies on this Blog and the content.
Love,
November 28th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
You are an “absolute stranger” who has been accusing us of federal crimes on your various blogs (four removed by Google) since May of 2009–long before we ever mentioned you by name on Blogonaut.
You have also sent hundreds of emails to federal and state law enforcement accusing us of federal crimes and have written the State Bar of California demanding that our attorney be “disbarred”.
You have also badmouthed us and our attorney on many other sites and blogs for the past seven months.
You started doing this in May of 2009 because we were required to delete over 100 of your slanderous posts about others and also had to ban you from our blog.
This was a month before we looked further into you and wrote our first Kelley Lynch piece.
Yet you imply that we randomly found YOU and started taking you to task.
Before you hijacked our blog while we were in Europe, we did not even know you existed.
You have embroiled us in your blogging and spam email activities and not the other way around.
November 28th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
IRS Commissioner’s Staff - Gianelli/Blogonaut Law Blog
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:31 PM
subject IRS Commissioner’s Staff - Gianelli/Blogonaut Law Blog
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 1:31 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Are you clear about an issue I would rather not discuss on the internet? If he’d murder his own nephews imagine what he might do to me? Gianelli-Blogonaut has no idea what I will or won’t post on the internet.
Why do you think Green and Gianelli-Blogonaut Law Blog (one and the same) are so interested in the evidence I have provided the IRS supporting the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud. I am not the only one that has made that allegation. Dale Burgess and DiMascio & Berardo concluded this as well, stated that he used me as an unwitting pawn (which hardly begins to describe it), and exposed me to criminal tax fraud. Mike Taitelman, who spoke to Kory, was told (by Kory) that if I did what they wanted, they would say I was a pawn. Otherwise, they would say I orchestrated this insane mess. I don’t know how Mike Taitelman would characterize our conversation but I took shorthand notes and hopefully the IRS has read all my emails, enjoyed some of the fun ones, cried over Posel’s attempts to convince me he cared about me and/or was in love with me, and agreed with Iris Keitel’s assessment that the SWAT incident alone sounded like a Hollywood movie. I thought so - in fact, based on the activity I saw outside my house with LAPD I thought they might have been extras and rented their outfits. I intend to contact Oliver Stone and Steven Segal this week. I did leave page 23 of Agile’s bogus lawsuit at Steven Segal’s house. That page is accurate and I am, of course, interested to know more about how Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon “conspired” to have me falsely arrested.
Let me make this clear to the IRS - if I, or my representatives, find out any details, uncover any documents or evidence, we will immediately send it to the IRS and the State of Kentucky. There will be no need to use a subpoena - and that includes my emails. I gave the IRS my email passwords (for my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com) accounts. I viewed (as did Boies Schiller as Neal Greenberg confirmed for me when he called me to discuss private annuities and tantric sex - which I found lame and stupid) those emails between me, Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, Bergman, Superfon, Westin, Greenberg, Stuart Fried (who confirmed in writing that there was no letter from Grubman, Indursky cautioning anyone that I might steal anything - that was apparently another Cohen/Kory lie), Stuart Bondell, and all the advisers - in particular Neal Greenberg, Norman Posel, Boies Schiller, Dan Scheid, Dave Chipman, Greenberg’s employees and others.
I can visualize the moment I wrote Posel to tell him I was informing Agent Betzer of the tax fraud. I believe it stunned him. Fortunately, Yongzin Rinpoche saw right through Posel - as did His Holiness Kusum Lingpa who cautioned me about him. His Holiness advised me to document everything in emails with witnesses. He was very very clear about that. He personally confirmed, for me and others, that he was reading these emails. Imagine how he felt when Greenberg/Posel refused to hand over evidence that people intended to destroy me and my family? Perhaps that’s why he publicly asked - at Greenberg’s house - if he had to return again. I also took His Holiness Kusum Lingpa’s advice on Traditional Holdings, LLC after he heard the details of my conversation with Zia Modabber. His Holiness was at my house anxiously awaiting that conversation. He told me not to relinquish any control of Traditional Holdings, LLC and understood it was an essential issue. In fact, he seemed to believe and identified Traditional Holdings, LLC as the key legal issue. The IRS might want to pay attention to that. His Holiness was an utterly brilliant man and extraordinary businessman as well. He understood “deals” He did, after all, negotiate with the communist Chinese for things like electricity, bridges, and things of that nature in Golok, Tibet. A mayor of a Tibetan town was in Los Angeles with a group of Chinese officials studying our agricultural methods. He assured me that Lamasang was a brilliant negotiator and brilliant man who fought him tooth and nail for his community and students. He told me Lamasang was utterly fearless. He informed me that the communist Chinese were afraid of Lamasang and some had become his students. Hung Kar Dorje Rinpoche informed me that this man was responsible for one incident where Lamasang was tortured, chained, and left outside overnight in a blizzard. Hung Kar Dorje Rinpoche also told me the temperature plunges to 100 below zero and your tears freeze. How Lamasang survived is inconceivable. These are the “holy men” that are being maligned by idiots and lunatics like Green, Blogonaut, and - most definitely - Michelle Blaine, Sprocket and that crowd. Sharmapa understands the legal process and has filed approximately 65 lawsuits and successfully proven that Situ is a national security threat to India. Imagine that? Do you think the fact that the communist Chinese wanted to “annex” Rumtek is a crucial issue for the Indian government? I do. In any event, these are the men who have protected me.
I’ve laid nothing out chapter and verse. That would be the IRS’ job, wouldn’t it? We are talking about a potential federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others for tax fraud and other criminal activity. Gianelli-Blogonaut has himself stated publicly that the IRS has a firm policy of not commenting on pending cases and/or matters. The State of Kentucky does as well. Mr. Rob Watts and I discussed that. I am aware of these policies. Perhaps the IRS can determine what Gianelli-Blogonaut is attempting to prove now. I think he is proclaiming that he contacted Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar in an attempt to determine what the IRS has pending. That is my firm conclusion. I think he thought Agent Wynar would fall for his lunacy and lies that I was spamming Agent Sopko/the Treasury and inadvertently divulge confidential information that relates to a pending prosecution of Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud Matter. That’s why he’s now calling Agent Sopko my “pet” agent. He’s now angry that Agent Sopko has not instructed me to remove her from my extremely public emails and/or commented on my extremely public posts addressing their lies, slander, and the fact that they have targeted me and their family - maliciously and viciously. The situation with Rutger is cruel and I know precisely how upset he is about this situation - that includes the fact that I reported criminal tax fraud to the IRS and our family was destroyed. My Father understands that this has indeed caused problems for my family - including my sister. One can then safely assume that intelligent people understand what this has cost me and my family. No reward can address that and the word reward in this context is revolting and insulting - to me personally. What reward? My children’s lives were destroyed, my Mother is concerned that these lunatics will target her, Rutger is personally being threatened, Ray’s life has been destroyed and he has issues to deal with that are monumental … That’s my reward. It’s one hell of a reward for doing what I was told I had to do and what I believed what my civic duty and responsibility. Mike Taitelman told me to look at the risks and conditions and decide where and with whom I wanted to stand. I did. I decided I would stand alone and I would absolutely be the last man standing. I am not bound to liars and criminals. Any such notion is preposterous and I don’t care if one of them is a so-called shameless calculated fraud lying folksinger who some people adore. Most people do not and think what he has done here is unconscionable - including his own former accountant, Ken Cleveland, who said this sounds like Enron, thought the IRS should file it’s suit in California, advised me that Kory is a maniac, thought Anjani Thomas was somehow behind some of this (after his lunch with Cohen, Kory, and Thomas), confirmed that Cohen called his client Mike Elizondo (dragging songwriter Mike Elizondo into his lunacy) - after Steven Clark Lindsey called Mike Elizondo and told him that Cohen was going after Ken Cleveland (which is what my advisers told me: Cohen was going after all his advisers and Kory told me, at our luncheon, that I had a cause of action against every single one of them), and told me that there was no way on earth that I could understand this situation because it is so complex (taxwise) that even he could not grasp all the issues.
Let me quote Cohen’s lawyer, Steve Blanq, who handled the insane situation with the $1 million deposit that was not a loan. It was decided, by Cohen personally - after being advised by Richard Westin - to take that deposit as a loan. Sony issued a $1 million 1099. This ultimately caused the Ogden, Utah IRS agent to become “nervous” (that is the word Steve Blanq used when he recounted this story for me) about Westin’s evasiveness. I still recall his document request and think he nailed the issue. Ken Cleveland told me that it was a miracle that the audit of Cohen’s charitable donation of stock to Mt. Baldy Abbot’s Fund passed muster with the IRS. He used the word “miracle” and said Cohen should hang the results on his wall. I felt the IRS should investigate that and do another audit - using evidence that has since arisen. And then, of course, there was the $7 million 1099 that caused Ken Cleveland to write what he told me, with Stuart Fried on the phone, was a cover-his-ass letter to Cohen. He shuddered to think of the penalties and interest that were accruing in relation to that 1099. Sony issued another $0 1099. Is the IRS going to tell me that the IRS is not interested in this matter. The hysteria it caused with Cohen and Westin, who were communicating all weekend - prior to Cohen’s call Monday morning to Ken Cleveland, was unnerving - as was Cohen, Westin, and Greenberg’s hysteria when they realized I switched accountants and was sent to tax lawyers and refused to meet with Cohen and Westin to unravel the corporate entities. If I was a trustee why would they have asked me to meet with them and unravel the entities? I wasn’t a trustee - that’s why. DiMascio & Berardo’s letter to Richard Westin caused hysteria. They asked, at the meeting that Cohen, Westin, Cistero, Thomas, and Lorca Cohen attended why the annuity had not been set up legally. I have no idea what they meant by this and have been unable to determine, on my own, what is illegal about the annuity. I am aware that no assets were transferred into Traditional Holdings, LLC. DiMascio & Berardo confirmed this and confirmed that Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. owns all the assets, LC Investments, LLC and LC personally collects the royalties, and Traditional Holdings sold something it didn’t own. I can follow that. I know the annuity was extinguished from the tax return in 2001 and I know Westin personally emailed me that it was a real company and a real annuity obligation - in 2004, after extinguishing it from the return. I know the promissory note was extinguished from the return. I realize two tax ID numbers were used - Dale Burgess pointed that out to me and I believe that was meant to intentionally deceive the IRS. I know the income from the sale to Sony was not reported to the IRS or the State of Kentucky. These seem like huge tax issues and matters that would reasonably cause concern for the IRS. It causes ordinary people to wonder why Cohen isn’t in prison. Literally. They have noted the lengths he has gone in his attempts to silence and terrorize me. They have concluded that his trip to Boulder is evidence that he is absolutely insane. And, they have concluded that Phil Spector was set up.
In any event, read Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest public post on Phawker.com. It addresses IRS matters and policies. Please note - he posted as “Blogonaut Law Blog.” Does the IRS see right through him also? Hopefully so.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
“I want an IRS and FBI agent to meet with me now and take command of the evidence. They are photocopies. They will know where to find the originals and they will know what exists. They are evidence that I believe will be used in a federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen for tax fraud and other criminal acts and I am convinced, personally, that a matter is pending.”
Almost 5 years later, you are just getting around to turning over this evidence now?
I thought you laid it out chapter and verse four and a half years ago?
No, you really want the opportunity to quiz the IRS about whether your report of alleged “tax fraud” will EVER bear fruit and if so when.
The IRS has a firm policy of not commenting on pending investigations, or even if an investigation is pending or has been closed. So you are out-of-luck.
Of course, they also know that anything they say to you at this point will be instantly published on the world-wide-web.
November 28th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
You are an “absolute stranger” who has been accusing us of federal crimes on your various blogs (four removed by Google) since May of 2009–long before we ever mentioned you by name on Blogonaut.
You have also sent hundreds of emails to federal and state law enforcement accusing us of federal crimes and have written the State Bar of California demanding that our attorney be “disbarred”.
You have also badmouthed us and our attorney on many other sites and blogs for the past seven months.
You started doing this in May of 2009 because we were required to delete over 100 of your slanderous posts about others and also had to ban you from our blog.
This was a month before we looked further into you and wrote our first Kelley Lynch piece.
Yet you imply that we randomly found YOU and started taking you to task.
Before you hijacked our blog while we were in Europe, we did not even know you existed.
You have embroiled us in your blogging and spam email activities and not the other way around.
November 28th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut Law Blog. I am asking the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Agent Sopko-Treasury, Agent Wynar/FBI, and others - publicly, to investigate you and determine if you have engaged (as I personally believe) in federal crimes. I have been clear of this. We have discussed the irrelevant point about Google removing my Blogs after you and others targeted them. Blaine publicly thanked you for targeting my Blogs and email accounts on her mControl Blog. I have addressed this issue, to some extent, with Google’s Legal Department - as you know. I personally deleted my philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com Blog after capturing “Bird” and other’s comments. Google’s Legal Team, unless they are complete idiots, should have been able to determine this.
That’s an interesting point - Blaine thanked you for targeting my Blogs and email accounts and you are stating that they were removed, by Google, long before you ever mentioned me by name on your - Gianelli’s - Blogonaut Blog. That is something that is noted and probably should be investigated.
I have spoken the truth about you and I have brought all your lies and slander, etc., about me and my family to your attention. You are Gianelli. You are your attorney. You are one and the same person. Is this some wacked out legal position you have taken? In a court of law you will be Stephen Gianelli, an officer of the court who is held to higher standards than others and understands laws regarding witness tampering, obstruction of justice, pending prosecutions, IRS policy, what it means to lie to the FBI, etc. You are Stephen Gianelli, the owner of Blogonaut’s Law Blog. You personally communicated with Cohen’s advisers, my former so-called friends (I don’t have any), Agent Sopko, Agent Wynar, Investigator William Frayeh, and others. All of this relates to Leonard Cohen’s probable prosecution for tax fraud and other criminal conduct and Phil Spector’s legal matter that I view as nothing other than a set up.
I absolutely am convinced you should be disbarred. The State Bar of California should thank me. The reason I haven’t filed a complaint yet (I did against Steve Cooley, Daniel Bergman, and some others) is because I want to be certain that I achieve the goal of having you disbarred and held responsible for your actions. Be clear about that.
You deleted my posts because I refuted your, Belark, and others malicious lies. Period. You have motive and that is evidence of it. Being banned from your vile Blog is an honor. It was also a lame attempt to explain away your obsession with me - that other people see. That’s why Nona Banks, after seeing what is going on here, wrote me that you are lunatics. She is correct. She also knows, for a fact, that you are liars. I think it would be impossible to “slander’ you, Kelly Green, Sydney, or the other people dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential prominent government witness or witness in other matters and to derail a potential and/or pending federal criminal prosecution of Cohen and/or others. You have stated, for the record, that you clearly understand IRS policy with respect to pending matters. And that is precisely why I think you contacted Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko - in a desperate attempt to determine what the IRS has pending with respect to Cohen. You also were communicating with Alan Jackson. Since he is Phil Spector’s prosecutor and given the fact that Michelle Blaine was publicly thanking you I think Phil Spector is vitally interested in this activity.
I have never stated or implied that you randomly round me and started taking me to task - for attempting to defend Mr. Spector and due to the fact that I publicly commented on your Blog (while you were in Europe, I guess and weren’t “monitoring” comments carefully) and addressing the fact that I believe Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector’s matters are somehow intertwined. You are also not in a position to address what I think or believe. You are a liar who continues to write to my son, my sister and her husband, and Douglas Penick after Rutger was threatened on this Blog about evidence that concerns the IRS. Not you. I have asked the IRS and FBI to take custody and command of that evidence and am convinced that the chain of evidence is now a crucial issue.
No one hijacked your Blog. You can and did delete items as you saw fit. In other words, you are able to silence the truth about these matters which is why you have blatantly proclaimed that I am banned. So what? I can still document your lies, etc. You’re doing a fairly good job of this yourself and, I might point out, of trapping yourself publicly.
My emails are not spam. They are addressed to IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Agent Kelly Sopko of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation - whom you have lied to and attempted to ensnare into revealing pending matters that relate to the IRS - which could have derailed a successful prosecution of Cohen for what I am convinced are crimes (see Neal Greenberg’s bogus lawsuit .. page 23 is accurate and he has raised “extortion” as a very real issue with Cohen and Kory), Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Ron Burkle, and many others who are witnessing this vulgar, vile, evil scenario. I, on the other hand, am documenting everything for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Agent Kelly Sopko of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation - so no details are overlooked.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
For the record: every single comment of mine on this Blog, on other internet sites, and in my emails is my personal point of view and my firm conviction.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:57 PM
subject The IRS Commissioner’s Staff
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 1:57 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Gianelli-Blogonaut has raised a valid point. I wasn’t randomly targeted. I think Gianelli is well aware that I have raised extremely valid issues. His attempts to silence me are astounding. He absolutely attempted to ensnare Agent Wynar/FBI into divulging information about a pending IRS matter. I am convinced of that. And I am convinced that it is a deadly serious matter and his motive is to target me and my family, slander and lie about us, in order to tamper with, intimidate, harass, and terrorize witnesses. Period.
I am going to go into the IRS with witnesses if agents from the IRS and FBI do not take immediate custody of the evidence now in my possession that relates to Cohen’s tax fraud matter that is obviously criminal. It endangers my life and subjects my family and I to further threats. I would like agents to sit down and talk to Rutger about Gianelli’s emails to him, Kelly Green’s threat regarding the evidence I discussed with Agent Sopko and her partner at Edie Lamm’s house, and other matters.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan - Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and the activity on Phawker
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM
subject Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan - Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and the activity on Phawker
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 2:01 PM (0 minutes ago)
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Do capture the contents of these Blogs. I am doing my best to document everything that is taking place on the public world-wide web. Much of this relates to Phil Spector and his murder trials that I view as a set up.
The evidence I have in my possession exposes me to further threats and dangerously unstable people who are fixated on me and obsessed with me. My Mother was concerned because a teenager committed suicide after being bullied and targeted on the internet. I think she was thinking of her grandchildren and probably me as well. I want the IRS and FBI to send agents to take possession and custody of the evidence and discussed this with Agent Sopko and her partner.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 6:26 pm
Excuse me, nut - you and Belark told me you went to the FBI because I was “spamming” the FBI. I, in turn, advised you that I would subpoena the tapes of all conversations and communications between you, Agent Sopko - including your email to her, and Agent Wynar/FBI. Agent Wynar is going to receive a subpoena. He is going to take the witness stand. He is going to explain, with me present, why he would be in a position to determine whether or not I was spamming a Treasury Agent - who I met with and who sent me information regarding Agent Luis Tejeda/IRS. That email, which has been made public and addressed ad nauseum, did not appear to be all that innocent. Agent Sopko instructed me to take my allegations of criminal tax fraud and the evidence in my possession to Agent Tejeda. I have no idea why the FBI would be in a position where they could address what it going on with me as it relates to the IRS, Treasury, and Department of Justice. I understand that Agent Wynar could have inadvertently been ensnared, by you, into divulging information about a pending(s) federal criminal prosecution of Cohen and others for tax fraud and/or criminal conduct. That tells me that Agent Wynar/FBI could have, personally, been used to derail a federal investigation and federal matter or matters. In other words, Agent Wynar could have been used to sabatage the IRS and Treasury. That is a deadly serious matter and that is precisely why you addressed Agent Sopko and the Treasury with the FBI instead of with Agent Sopko. You were able to email her and she phoned you. Why wouldn’t you simply have addressed the issues relating to Agent Sopko - that arose in your mind - with Agent Sopko or asked for her supervisor and filed a proper complaint? Because you attempted to ensure Agent Wynar into your deadly game - exposing Agent Wynar to real liability. He now has legal exposure, as it relates to me, to accusations - on my part (raised by you) - of slander, malicious gossip, an attempt to undermine my credibility as a witness for the IRS and perhaps Phil Spector (which definitely will interest Phil Spector), and myself - I might point out. He is also exposed to accusations that he has lied about me to you, a mere stranger, and be directed - on the stand - to address issues relating to Agent Kelly Sopko who is now being referred to (by you) as my “pet” federal agent. He can also, from my perspective, be accused of witness tampering. He is the only FBI agent involved in this matter who can be accused of those things. That includes all agents I have spoken with at the Denver FBI, Los Angeles FBI, and the New Jersey FBI. Why has he been exposed to these things (if what you have publicly stated he revealed about his comments and/or remarks related to me and various matters)? Because you attempted to ensnare him. That’s why. Even if he did slander me and lie about me - the reason he was discussing me with you is because you went to the FBI. Joff Belark wrote me that he went to the FBI and later wrote that you, Gianelli, did. Obviously, as I discussed with my son this morning, that is something I intend to pursue legally and something that is extremely serious and will be litigated. You cannot use the FBI to intimidate me - as I pointed out was happening to the female that answered the phone one day when Agent Wynar was away from his desk.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 6:28 pm
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Ms> Lynch:
You have not idea what I told the FBI–let alone whether it was knowingly false (it was not).
November 28th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Dear Kelley Lynch:
You have your chronology wrong.
We returned from Europe in May of 2009 and received an email from Leonard Cohen’s counsel bringing to our attention scores of posts by you on Blogonaut accusing Mr. Cohen of serious crimes without foundation.
We stated searching through our various PRO-Phil Spector posts your comments were posted on, and we discovered that you had hijacked our blog—meaning that the comments and discussions on our blog had become about you, your complaints, your problems, your life, and not the topic of the posts. None of the other commenters supported you, and this was on a very PRO-Spector website.
In addition, we also discovered that you were rude and threatening to other commenters and had slandered other named persons, including accusing one man of being a manufacturer of methamphetamine and accusing others of being child molesters. You had also threatened to have Bruce Cutler and the IRS “investigate” the true identities of the commenters posting on Blogonaut that took you to task.
We started searching for and deleting your posts but this proved too time consuming. We were required to delete entire blog posts (which were all highly favorable to Phillip Spector) to remove your scores of posts.
You then kept posting post after post.
We then had to enable comment moderation (which we had never done before) to prevent you from posting your slander in the future. (Sorry, but calling a person a “child molester” who has never been convicted as such on our blog is unacceptable.)
We posted a comment on the welcoming page of our blog informing our readers that “due to a persistent spammer, we were required to enable comment moderation”. You were not identified by name. (We experienced a sharp drop off in comments that persists to this day.)
You then sent us a dozen attempted posts threatening to sue us and also started posting libelous material about us on your two blogs, including the “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch” blog.
When our attorney was required to write to you, you then started libeling him by name on your two blogs—and we mean scores of posts.
You then started writing emails to the IRS, Justice Department, governors, police departments, prosecutors, media outlets, and scores of other persons cc’d accusing us and out attorney of obstruction of justice witness tampering, of being “gay”, and having a thing for Leonard Cohen, etc.
It was only then that we looked further into you and started drafting an investigative piece on who you are and what is your complaint against Leonard Cohen. We contacted you for comment on the piece and incorporated your comments into the piece.
See here: http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/06/leonard-cohen-harasser-undeterred-by-79.html
If you had not hijacked out blog and then refused to take no for an answer when you were banned, and then began disparaging us on your blogs, we would have never written a single word mentioning you by name on Blogonaut or any other site.
You hijack every discussion board, blog, and on-line forum that will accept your comments, the other commenters take you to task, and you respond with insults, reports to the IRS/Justice Department for “witness tampering” and threats of litigation.
The last comment thread you hijacked before Phawker was on the Hartford Currant. The thread became completely about you, and ultimately the administrators pulled the plug.
Get your chronology straight Kelley Lynch.
Your bannage from Blogonaut preceded the article about you and so did your slander campaign against this blog and our attorney.
You embroiled us in this slow motion and very public psychological meltdown of yours and if you had never hijacked our blog comments we would not even know you exist. You did this long before we wrote a single word about you.
November 28th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:36 PM
subject Re: http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214286
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 2:36 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
I discussed Blogonaut-Gianelli and the Agent Wynar/FBI situation with a friend of Rutger’s. He understands that Blogonaut-Gianelli attempted to ensnare Agent Wynar and derail a pending federal prosecution(s). He also said Rutger has not withheld any evidence and was never asked for any evidence - by anyone - and therefore can be accused of nothing whatsoever. He wasn’t hiding it. That is an excellent point. I advised him that I have asked the IRS and FBI to take custody of the evidence now and he confirmed receiving my emails earlier on, understands why I am sending them and what I am documenting, and realizes that this is a deadly serious matter or matters. It took me approximately 2 minutes to explain what was going on with Gianelli-Blogonaut so he doesn’t stand a chance in hell of prevailing from what I can tell. He also agrees - Gianelli’s contacts with me (and the public posts) are meant to witness tamper, etc. Fortunately he is not a brainless, vicious, lunatic and thinks it’s weird that people have contacted my sister, her husband, Rutger, and Douglas Penick addressing issues relating to Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen matters.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Good luck with your IRS/FBI meeting Ms. Lynch (if it even happens).
If it does happen we will certainly hear about it in scores of emails from you and in post after internet post.
November 28th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
Just one final question.
If you have such a close repationship with Phil Spector, in what month and year where you last in the same room together?
Ten years ago?
November 28th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
I have an idea, Kelly Green. Why don’t you call up Bruce Cutler and threaten him with prison - for being in possession of my faxes that are actually duplicates of much of the evidence that is now in my possession. He confirmed receiving them - for Gianelli/Blogonaut, understands evidence and the laws surrounding evidence, criminals, and I know for a fact that he and/or his office did not fax anyone at Deneuve Construction complaining about my faxes. I am in possession of that fax and know precisely what was written on there. I doubt Bruce Cutler would permit someone to frivolously fax me. After all, I met with his investigator (if I recall what Dale Kelly told me correctly) and discussed the Phil Spector pending prosecution, Brian Bennett’s report that was in Dale Kelly’s possession, the King Drew matter, and other details. He didn’t appear to be taking those matters lightly and took excellent notes - I might point out. I think he also understood precisely how upset I was and how disturbing I found Brian Bennett’s report. I noted, for Mr. Kelly, that much of the information was confused, distorted, and garbled together in a manner that I did not present it. Information was left out - including the fact that I told Brian Bennett, clearly, that I did not believe Phil Spector had a gun the night my sister and I visited him and picked up the phone and called my Mother to see what she recalled. She recalled nothing. Brian Bennett’s report also stated that I visited Phil Spector in Los Angeles on business trips. We never discussed that and it never happened. I visited Leonard Cohen in Los Angeles on business trips and once, while staying with Cohen, went to Phillip’s house. Roscoe Beck was present that evening at Cohen’s. Phil Spector did not send a car for me the night we went out after the Clarkson incident. Phil Spetor personally picked me up, met my son Rutger, shook his hand, saw my housekeeper, greeted my dogs - who he wrote me a funny note about later, and escorted me home, saw me safely into my house, and then left. We did not have sex in case some pervert lawyer is curious. We were and remain very dear friends. We discussed the Clarkson suicide at that dinner. We discussed details of his arrest. We discussed the fact that he was tasered and what that was like. We discussed Marvin Mitchelson, a man I knew and spent time with - with Phil Spector, and I told Phillip that with friends like Mitchelson he did not need enemies. We discussed the “sex tests” Phillip was forced to undergo. We touched on a relationship he had been having with Nancy Sinatra. I thought she deserted Mr. Spector in his hour of true need but do not know that for a fact. We discussed quite a number of things that arose for Mr. Spector because Clarkson - high and drunk - was not thinking correctly, played with a gun, and shot herself. Then we moved onto other topics and had a very very delightful evening. The staff was delighted to see Mr. Spector and a waitress, who liked him immensely, joined us in our booth. They appreciate his tips and he is gracious and generous with the staff of the restaurants, etc., that I have been to with him. He is also open to being targeted and accosted - as I have witnessed at the House of Blues and the evening he was inducted into the Rock ‘n Roll Hall of Fame. I accompanied Phil Spector to that event. I witnessed, with Allen Klein, and Jericho (who is a fascinating man) the fact that Phil Spector flew Ike Turner into that event - when Tina Turner was inducting Phillip into the Rock ‘n Roll Hall of Fame. He paid for his trip and he paid for his hotel stay because Phil Spector is a loyal friend and gracious man. I saw Yoko Ono and Keith Richards drop by his room afterwards to congratulate him and I understand that Phil Spector is a legendary record producer and a genius. I arranged trips for Mr. Spector. I worked for Mr. Spector for two straight years and, at times, thereafter. I arranged security for him and met Jay Romaine - former LAPD who worked for him - and understand what he meant by that comment to Alhambra PD. Jay Romaine, who Phil and I had dinner with him and discussed the fact that I did not want a handgun around my sons and was trying to figure out legally how to get rid of it … Lindsey took it and the hollow-point bullets he wanted after the LA Riots … I wanted and bought a dog who was trained to attack and who saw right through Cohen and didn’t want him near me - dogs have instincts about people and Cohen, who was with Jennifer Warnes on his lawn, understood this), apparently could have testified that the gun Clarkson used to shoot herself was not Phil Spector’s. Bill Pavelic wrote me that. He also wrote me that charges should never have been brought against Phil Spector.
I know Phil Spector, I met with his and/or Bruce Cutler’s investigator. I was told I was probably a witness in Phil Spector’s murder trial - by Investigator John Thompson of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office. Detective Silva was present for our conversation - which touched on why I was taken to King Drew, questioned about Phil Spector, and the fact that Inglewood PD was present at my house. They didn’t seem particularly stupid to me and we weren’t discussing light and lovey issues. I can assure you that Phil Spector will address these issues. I know him. You do not. You cannot speak for him and you cannot speak for me. You do not know me. And yet, you are lying about me and slandering me and fabricating stories, targeting my children and family members, writing my son whose friend thinks it is “weird” and you and Gianelli, et al. are “witness tampering” and attempted to “ensnare Agent Wynar and derail a federal prosecution.” He agrees - the IRS and FBI should send agents to collect the evidence in my possession that I am reviewing. In the meantime, call Bruce Cutler and personally threaten him with Prison, Ms. Green.
You sound like some lame, stupid lawyer who is extremely interested in Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen, Lana Clarkson, evidence, the appeal, and other extremely pertinent issues. It makes me wonder if you’re affiliated with “Alan Jackson.” I’ve mentioned this to “the feds.”
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
One final question. Do you think I’m on the witness stand here, Gianelli? Here’s my answer: when Phil Spector and I publicly dined after the Clarkson suicide is none of your business. I’ll bring your interest in that matter to the attention of Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
Just one final question.
If you have such a close repationship with Phil Spector, in what month and year where you last in the same room together?
Ten years ago?
November 28th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
You should know when Clarkson shot herself at Phillip’s house. Was that 10 years ago?
November 28th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
For the record, Leonard Cohen was aware that Phillip and I were having dinner and discussed it afterwards, I’m sorry to say. He was intrigued and noted that I could end up in People magazine but told me to go because he felt Phil Spector needed the support of friends. He must have been unbearably jealous and furious.
November 28th, 2009 at 7:14 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM
subject Re: Gianelli/Blogonut Is Now Questioning Me About Phil And My Last Encounter, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 3:13 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the Feds,
Al Jackson might be interested in when Phillip and I last saw one another.
Let me reiterate what Marco, Cooley’s own investigator who was pretending to be Julia’s assistant, asked me to “convey” to the Denver FBI - Merry Christmas to the Denver FBI. I think Pete nailed that one: it sounded precisely like something the Sopranos would say prior to riddling a car with bullets. In other words, Marco sounded like he was a gangster engaged in criminal activity and/or organized crime. Fortunately, Rockaway Police saw right through his threats. The New Jersey FBI wasn’t clear what was going on and the agent was clear that he had no idea what the Denver FBI was doing but could only hear every third word because the connection was bad. I used the cell phone John Southard, Jr. obtained for me on his account.
Don’t you think Gianelli-Blogonaut should know when Clarkson shot herself? I have stated, quite a number of times, publicly that Phil and I had dinner after that incident and that’s how I know what he was thinking, what happened, etc. We discussed it and I asked him, point blank, if he shot her. Why? Because we’re very good friends who can and have discussed everything. My Mother knows how close we were and she frequently spoke with him and thought the card he sent me after the Clarkson suicide was one of the most outrageous things she has ever seen - and funny. My Mother and Father are actually the people who gave Phillip my Cockatoo.
Why do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut is bringing up my last encounter with Phillip as a “final question” as he has now publicly stated. We were out in public and Cohen was well aware of that and, no doubt, seething with jealousy.
I’ve posted, on Phawker, some comments about my relationship with Phillip, my meeting with Dale Kelly and the fact that we reviewed Brian Bennett’s report and discussed the King Drew matter, and the fact that I discussed this and the presence of Inglewood PD on May 25, 2005 with Investigator Thompson and Detective Silva - who was present when John Thompson personally told me I was probably a witness in the Phil Spector matter.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Dale Kelly - Phil Spector Matter Inbox X
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:15 PM
subject Dale Kelly - Phil Spector Matter
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 3:15 PM (1 minute ago)
Hello Mr. Kelly,
How are you? I am emailing you because I have mentioned you on public Blogs and in my emails. I want everyone to have the opportunity to address anything that is not accurately retold.
I trust you’re well.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 7:24 pm
IRS Commissioner’s Staff Inbox X
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:22 PM
subject IRS Commissioner’s Staff
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 3:22 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
I hope Kelly Green calls Bruce Cutler and threatens him with prison re. the evidence I faxed him. I faxed him quite a lot of what Dale Burgess sent me.
I wonder who posted publicly, on Blaine’s mControl Blog, that I’m not the only one with files on Leonard Cohen? I found that post fascinating. It makes me think of Phil Spector’s incredibly funny faxes to me - about Cohen and about his “taxes.”
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
When my meeting or meetings with the IRS and/or FBI agents happens you will hear nothing about it. Mark my word, lunatic.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Good luck with your IRS/FBI meeting Ms. Lynch (if it even happens).
If it does happen we will certainly hear about it in scores of emails from you and in post after internet post.
November 28th, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Lana Clarkson died on February 3, 2003, which makes your “dinner” with Phil Spector over six years ago.
You have not said whether you were among 20 others dining with Spector at a restaurant or whether the “dinner” was just the two of you. (Your evasiveness would suggest the former rather than the latter.)
And since then, he has not telephoned you nor have you seen him face-to-face, correct?
On your last post, you even posted your auto-reply from Anderson Cooper, so we have no doubt that if the IRS even daned to phone or email you (let alone meet with you) we will hear all about it.
Why? Because you cannot help yourself.
Us, a “lunatic”? There you go projecting again.
November 28th, 2009 at 7:35 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Interested In My Upcoming Meeting With IRS And FBI Agents Inbox X
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:31 PM
subject Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Interested In My Upcoming Meeting With IRS And FBI Agents
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 3:31 PM (2 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI,
Unfortunately for Blogonaut-Gianelli, et al., I won’t be divulging any details of our meetings, conversations, or discussions.
The man I’m sitting with understands that calling Agent Sopko my “pet” was and is an insult to “the feds.” He also understands that corporate books and records reflect the understanding between people and shareholders - for instance Leonard Cohen and me. Mike Taitelman, who told me DiMascio let this situation with Cohen/Kory get out of control, also advised me (as my lawyer) that when there is a possible he said/she said situation you go to the corporate books and records which reflect the understanding and agreement between the parties. Mike Taitelman is a far better lawyer than Kory, Rice, Gianelli, et al. Scott Lord’s partner understood this as well. And, I spoke to a lawyer who was recommended by Peter Shukat. He understood this situation in 15 minutes and told me, with respect to the “extinguished annuity” that Cohen owes the gift taxes as well.
When my meeting with IRS and FBI agents happens I can assure you that Gianelli-Blogonaut will not be hearing about it - via emails and/or public posts. I have addressed and attempted to address his lies, slander, targeting of my family, etc. ad nauseum. He is a lawyer and knows the consequences of his actions and understands that truth is the defense to allegations of slander. He is standing on lies and has, from my perspective, trapped himself - including with respect to Agent Wynar.
All the best,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, I thought you addressed your final question to me. You certainly seem obsessed - and now with details about my last encounter with Phil Spector. First of all, Investigator Brian Bennett took possession of a fax Phil Spector sent me after we had dinner - and there are other faxes, letters, etc. documenting that.
So what if my dinner with Mr. Spector was five or six years ago. What does it matter to you and what does that prove? I spoke to an investigator on his matter, Dale Kelly, who was just copied in on my emails and we discussed Mr. Spector so I assume Phillip is aware of that meeting and what was discussed. That seems dead obvious. No - 20 people weren’t at the booth with me and Phil Spector. The waitress, however, sat down with us for a while.
I have absolutely spoken with Phil Spector since that time and phone records can prove that point.
Anderson Cooper was not copied in on my last email but you are, as usual, lying and fabricating things. What does Anderson Cooper have to do with the IRS? Is Anderson Cooper the IRS Commissioner?
I can assure you that you won’t hear any of the details of the meeting I have asked the IRS and FBI to arrange with me, Rutger, Ray and their agents who I also think should phone my sister, her husband, my parents, and Douglas Penick - that involves you because I want to know why you have contacted them and believe you are attempting to harass, threaten, and intimidate my friends and family members - in particular Rutger.
My evasiveness suggests nothing. I am not being evasiveness.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Lana Clarkson died on February 3, 2003, which makes your “dinner” with Phil Spector over six years ago.
You have not said whether you were among 20 others dining with Spector at a restaurant or whether the “dinner” was just the two of you. (Your evasiveness would suggest the former rather than the latter.)
And since then, he has not telephoned you nor have you seen him face-to-face, correct?
On your last post, you even posted your auto-reply from Anderson Cooper, so we have no doubt that if the IRS even daned to phone or email you (let alone meet with you) we will hear all about it.
Why? Because you cannot help yourself.
Us, a “lunatic”? There you go projecting again.
November 28th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
Yes, you’re a lunatic. And two people who know me have now confirmed that they feel the same way about all of the people who have targeted me - including you. I don’t believe I’ve ever received an auto-reply from Anderson Cooper and/or his show.
You have “no doubt that if the IRS even dared to phone or email” me. Why would the IRS have to be “dared” to contact me. Is criminal tax fraud a game?
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 7:52 pm
More Questions About My Last Encounter With Phil Spector Inbox X
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
anderson.cooper@cnn.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM
subject More Questions About My Last Encounter With Phil Spector
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 3:49 PM (1 minute ago)
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
The “lunatic” cannot help himself. He is obsessed with me and Phil Spector’s matter. I don’t believe I am being evasive. I’m quite direct actually.
Why does Gianelli (posting as Blogonaut Law Blog) want to know if I’ve spoken with Phillip since?
Love,
Kelley
P.S. The comment about Anderson Cooper is ridiculous. I’ve now copied Anderson Cooper in on this email and do not believe I’ve ever received an auto-reply from that show.
November 28th, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Blogonaut, have you noticed she seems to be making things up as goes along again. New people to spam, new people to libel and slander, new people to lie about. Lunatic is a perfect description of her, always has been. Desperation is taking over completely and I would love to be a fly on the wall when the IRS and FBI share her demand for a meeting. It is at least an opportunity for them to have a good belly laugh. I wonder if she will share their response, if any, with the rest of us. Not…
November 28th, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Blogonaut-Gianelli, what I do know for a fact is that you could not advise the FBI in Oakland that I was “spamming” Agent Sopko and I have never been advised by Agent Sopko to remove her from any of my emails as “Joff Belark” suggested in one of his lame emails - when he wrote yet another lie disguished as an article.
I guess Sydney will have to take up your defense now. Perhaps she can knowingly address what you knew was “knowingly false” or not. I would recommend that you hire an attorney because you are one lunatic - as other people also believe - that has lied to the FBI from what I can tell and exposed Agent Wynar/FBI to very very serious legal issues that definitely include Phil Spector. Perhaps Agent Wynar/FBI would like to explain his slanderous remarks (as recounted by you) about me to Phil Spector and his legal team - since being contacted by you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, and possibly Joff Belark who I believe wrote me that he went to the FBI about my “spamming” the Treasury with respect to my emails that address issues relating to Cohen’s tax fraud I was told is criminal. For instance, the out and out destruction of my life, the targeting of my children, threats, harassment of my family and friends, etc. These are clearly extremely serious issues and they absolutely will be addressed in court. When they are you will know precisely who represents me.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Ms> Lynch:
You have not idea what I told the FBI–let alone whether it was knowingly false (it was not).
November 28th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
Sydney, why don’t you just email Gianelli-Blogonaut and/or pick up the phone and call “him?” I “seem” to be making things up as I go along. Actually, that honor goes to Gianelli-Blogonaut, Kelly Green (including its “threat” relating to Rutger), and others on this Blog and the word wide web.
I see you noticed that I included Dale Kelly on my emails. Dale Kelly is the investigator I met with in Santa Monica - when we reviewed Brian Bennett’s report, whether or not I felt Bennett was wired when he came to my house (which seemed impossible given the report I was looking at), the SWAT incident, King Drew, etc. I have emailed Mr. Kelly because I want him to have the opportunity to review and comment on anything he believes I have not properly recounted.
I agree - there is evidence of “desperation” on this Blog (and probably elsewhere) but I am not desperate.
Too bad - you won’t be a fly on the wall in any meeting I have with IRS and/or FBI agents and hand over the documents I have now asked them to immediately take into their custody. These documents relate to criminal tax fraud and the elaborate planning and details that went into the tax planning and corporate structures.
Why would the IRS and FBI have a good belly laugh? I’ve spoken to FBI agents and they didn’t appear to be laughing. In fact, one appeared to tell me to go to the District Attorney of Boulder and the Attorney General of Colorado with respect to the incident with Boulder PD coming into my office at Deneuve Construction (after I got off the phone with “Officer Garrin/LAPD” and documented that for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others on my public emails). That Duty Agent did not seem like a frivolous man to me. He seemed, if I have to characterize him, deadly serious and fiercely intelligent. We do not see eye to eye on who was responsible for sending Boulder PD into my office. He did not feel it was LAPD and stated that LAPD was not behind it. I believe LAPD is definitely involved in that matter because of my conversation with “Officer Garrin/LAPD,” SMART, and others.
How would you know what a perfect description of me is and always has been. You and the other “terrorists” on this Blog (who are obviously obsessed with me and the matters that have been raised) don’t know me unless, of course, you’re posting anonymously and playing a game here. If so, you are aware that I intend to subpoena the IP address information and am convinced that no one can ever really post anonymously. The FBI might agree with me on this point.
Keep wondering if I’ll divulge whether or not I am meeting with IRS and/or FBI agents (who I have also asked to meet with Rutger and interview Ray now - as well as speak with my sister, her husband, and Douglas Penick). It is time for the IRS and FBI to take custody of the documents that I have in my possession. This will remove any future possible threats directed at my son. That is a deadly serious matter to me and the IRS and FBI should be aware of the fact that my children and family have been targeted and threatened on this Blog and elsewhere. If they think that’s funny they can explain the fact that they are sadistic thugs in front of jurors.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Blogonaut, have you noticed she seems to be making things up as goes along again. New people to spam, new people to libel and slander, new people to lie about. Lunatic is a perfect description of her, always has been. Desperation is taking over completely and I would love to be a fly on the wall when the IRS and FBI share her demand for a meeting. It is at least an opportunity for them to have a good belly laugh. I wonder if she will share their response, if any, with the rest of us. Not…
November 28th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
anderson.cooper@cnn.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM
subject IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 4:30 PM (3 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI,
“Sydney” is now interested in my upcoming meeting with agents from the IRS and FBI. This evidence has now exposed Rutger to threats. As you probably know that is a deadly serious matter and the longer this evidence is in my possession the longer I am exposed to threats. Why would IRS and FBI agents have a belly laugh about the issues I’m addressing? That is an outrageous and outlandish allegation raised by “Sydney” who is stating publicly how I’ve always been. The person has stated that it does not know me and I want to know who these people are who are lying about me, maliciously slandering me, and clearly attempting to publicly undermine my credibility. That is dead obvious. Lunatic hardly begins to describe these people. They seem deranged and my Mother did note that this situation has now exposed me to dangerously unstable people and I concur.
Why would Sydney, an absolute stranger, love to be a fly on the wall at any meeting between me, the IRS, and FBI? Can you figure that out? Why would it want to know what was being discussed, privately, in a meeting with IRS and FBI agents. I want this evidence picked up and I want the IRS and FBI to take it into their possession. These people are insane and these issues are real - including a potential criminal prosecution relating to Cohen’s tax fraud. As I have said, I believe there may be some evidence that I may not have emailed or mailed/couriered to the IRS and/or others - like Bruce Cutler, Abkco Records, Phil Spector, Boies Schiller, and others. I view every document as crucially important. A great deal of evidence has already been intentionally destroyed which is absolutely bizarre - by Major Brunk. I phoned the FBI in Los Angeles the day he hired movers and was going to rent a storage space - with the license plate number of the truck they used. There must be records of who rented that which is why I did this. Why? Because there were at least three huge boxes of evidence that I intended to provide the IRS and Rutger witnessed that as well. The boxes were clearly marked on all four sides and the top. Brunk confirmed for Rutger, after that day, that I and/or he could go to the house to gather our “personal” possessions. That would be everything.
I would like to hear from someone and probably will publicly post that I met with someone. I won’t divulge any information because I see this situation as a deadly serious matter and realize that these posters have some type of “motive.”
All the best,
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
November 28th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
Who cares about Kelley Lynch? No one.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
I will have my chronology correct when my legal documents are prepared. Everything is documented by my emails and on these public Blogs.
I don’t care when you returned from Europe. It is irrelevant. The Europeans are quite fortunate that you left.
You have stated that you did not talk to Robert Kory and/or Michelle Rice - yet I believe you have publicly stated otherwise elsewhere. Thank you for confirming that Leonard Cohen is monitoring my activities, public posts, and probably my emails. That’s precisely what I thought he proved in his perjured Declaration - filed with Boulder Municipal Court. I was told, by DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess, that Cohen committed and exposed me to criminal tax fraud. These allegations are not without foundation and I could care less what Leonard Cohen and/or his idiot lawyers have to say about that. Leonard Cohen should have paid his taxes and avoided the complicated structures and complex tax planning that is the work of he and his representatives - and not me. As DiMascio & Berardo noted in their letter to Richard Westin - he was the architect of Traditional Holdings, LLC. Westin emailed me that he did not represent me and that is a fact and obvious. Cohen and Kory might want to review all the memorandums and letters Westin sent us - including the one to me and Cohen in the fall of 2004 advising that the IRS could overturn Traditional Holdings, LLC if they noticed a disregard for form. How about a disregard for everything - including selling something it did not own - to Sony. Fortunately, Cohen made the personal warranties and representations to Sony about the sale and that entity. I have no idea how - I was the 99.5% owner and the assets (according to his former accountant, Ken Cleveland, and my former accountant, Dale Burgess) are in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. The IRS is the party that will determine whether or not these allegations are without foundation and/or basis. Not Cohen and his lying thugs.
You discovered I hijacked your Blog. If that’s true why don’t I have the password to access it? Are you accusing me of hijacking into your account now? Do not speak for Phil Spector. Go ahead and speak for Leonard Cohen. Your Blog and it’s articles on Phil Spector is a highly monitored Blog. That is obvious. You silence people when you see fit and then attempt to accuse them of hijacking something they have no access to. Save all the documents you just publicly noted you have. I intend to subpoena them - including those that were “threatening” to other commentors and slandered others. The man I accused of being involved with meth labs is under investigation by the Dallas FBI - as was his nephew (my friend’s brother). Contact the FBI and tell them I said - go ahead and start complimenting the man you are investing for murdering someone and his connection to meth labs. Are you now defending him and/or do you know him?
The man’s nephew told me he believed this man could potentially “murder” him and his brother. Are you clear about that? He wrote me, and I forwarded this to the DOJ, that his uncle is a dangerous man. The FBI in Dallas has publicly stated, in a press release, that they are concerned about their welfare in connection with the people involved with meth labs, etc. Is that a laughing matter also? Write the FBI and tell them it is then.
Freda Guttman, not I, advised Ann Diamond (who posted this publicly) “Lorca Cohen” told her classmates at Concordia University in Montreal that her father molested her. I think it goes to character, personally, but did not make this allegation. It is one reason, I believe, that Kory wrote and threatened Ann Diamond. Van Penick did not. He advised Cohen to litigate the situation and I suggested that Van contact Diamond and raise the issue that this could potentially hurt Lorca Cohen. These are Lorca Cohen’s words coming back to haunt her, if she made this declaration at Concordia University and Freda Guttman told the truth to Ann Diamond - who confirmed this in emails that I have provided the IRS, DOJ, and Phil Spector’s legal team. That is the end of this discussion. Cohen should litigate the situation with Freda Guttman personally. That is what he was advised to do and I was shocked that he chose not to. I have not accused “others” of being child molesters. I have recounted an incident about Leonard Cohen that Ann Diamond publicly posted on her website.
I understand that my requests to the IRS and others to “investigate” the true identities of the commenters on various public internet sites is threatening. Bruce Cutler is out of the story. He was clear with you and so was I: he does not represent me and I believe you called him to determine if he still represents Phil Spector. It is very similar to your actions with Agent Wynar. In fact, it appears to be your “signature.”
I understand the lengths you have gone to silence me for Leonard Cohen and/or his legal advisers - and probably others. Alan Jackson comes to mind. How unfortunate - I could have gone through the posts in no time and left the favorable Phil Spector content.
You are posting here - post after post. You weren’t posting here first. I did not enter this Blog and see a post by you. I responded to an article Phawker wrote about Leonard Cohen. They decided to print that. I was then attacked and the cyber-terrorists descended. Stop whining about activity you are obsessively engaged in. Fascinating - my comments so concerned you (particularly, I would assume, the ones addressing your lies and slander and Joff Belark’s lie disguised as an article) that you had to enable comment moderation.
Since when does the truth and a factual account of an incident become so sensitive? Night after night, Nancy Grace is on television entertaining people with tales of gore and violence - and child molestation. America is definitely not immune to this and seems to enjoy these details.
I have seen and documented the lengths you have gone to defend and/or explain away your actions. I, and others, are not buying them or falling for them. I have attempted to comment as of today, right? Is that what you are stating Gianelli-Blogonaut with respect to your “Blog?” Well, that proves (as usual) that you are a bald-faced liar.
Since my attempts to address your lies and slander, etc. failed I advised you that I intend to sue you personally and your Blog - and possibly people posting vile and vicious lies about me and my family and others. You are going to be forced to prove that I have libeled you on Blogonaut’s Blog and/or my Blog (that I deleted) philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com. Where’s the suit you recently advised me you are filing against me? I intend to subpoiena Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Treasury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Cohen, and others. I am perfectly comfortable researching legal issues and writing legal documents.
Excuse me, Blogonut, you are Stephen Gianelli - why do you keep writing about “our attorney?” You are one and the same person. I libeled you, a person called Blogonaut, and your attorney, a person called Stephen Gianelli, and you are both the same person. How precisely does that work?
I continue to write the IRS, Department of Justice, FBI, Agent Sopko, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others, and continue to maintain that you have obstructed justice (and your attorney, if you like), witness tampered, etc. I have no idea if you are gay or not - it was meant as a generic insult and I see you took it as such. It was also mild based on what you have engaged in here. I have never said you have “a thing” for Leonard Cohen. I have stated, for the record, that you are obsessed with me.
What do you mean that “you” started drafting an “investigative piece” on me? Are you saying that you are Joff Belark, your lying reporter who slander me and lied about me and pretended that was an “article?” I have addressed, ad nauseum, the lies and slander in the article - see link below.
http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/06/leonard-cohen-harasser-undeterred-by-79.html
That’s part of the problem - you do not want to take “no” for an answer. You are arrogant. That is abundantly clear as was your attempt to have Bruce Cutler acknowledge anything about his present relationship with Phil Spector; to have Agent Wynar/FBI divulge information to you about a pending IRS matter involving Cohen and possibly help sabatage (which is what I think you are doing) a potential federal criminal tax prosecution relating to extremely valid allegations of criminal tax fraud - supported by evidence, witnesses, and well documented. That would include the evidence in Boulder Municipal Court that I directed Joff Belark to
Posting comments is not hijacking anything. You and your thug gang of posters descend on sites, post on sites, and get extremely upset when your theories are refuted and your lies and malicious slander is addressed. You people couldn’t take me to task if you tried. You may have successfully pulled the wool over Agent Wynar’s eyes but I do not believe you pulled the wool over Bruce Cutler’s. I also do not believe you are in a position to speak for Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Dennis Riordan and/or Doron Weinberg. You can absolutely speak for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Sopko, Agent Wynar, and the Treasury. If they think that’s acceptable - that’s their problem. Literally.
I am not “threatening” litigation. I have been clear - I intend to litigate these, and other, issues including the fact that I am convinced you personally, Gianelli-Blogonaut-and now possibly Joff Belark, are engaged in a smear campaign relating to me and my family that is nothing other than an attempt to undermine my credibility, destroy my reputation, and derail any possible federal and/or state proseuctions relating to the issues I have publicly raised and am publicly discussing - including on this specific Blog (Phawker).
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214340
I asked the Hartford Courant, in emails, to take down the slanderous comments on their Blog. If you have information to the contrary, proving their reasons for doing so, make them public now.
Stop attempting to command me around.
I have documented, for the IRS-DOJ-and Phil Spector’s legal team, how this situation with you, your Blog, other internet sites, and various posters who are publicly lying about me and maliciously slandering me while threatening and attacking my friends and family members, unfolded.
I am not having a public psychological meltdown. I am documenting everything and as Nona Banks noted in her email - pointing out this Blog and the threats relating to Rutger, you appear to be “lunatics.”
Your obsession with me is repulsive. Your aggression is abundantly apparent and I believe the IRS and/or FBI should sit down with me to discuss you - Gianelli/Blogonaut - in particular.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
doronweinberg ,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
Paul Huebl ,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“attorney. general” ,
Mick Brown ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
bdeixler ,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
John Cove ,
Paul Burger ,
CHEWY GURU
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Thaye Dorje ,
“YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
Jewel of Activity ,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
dboies@bsfllp.com,
David Moorhead ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
“m.j. smith” ,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov,
mayor@cityofhouston.net,
Nona Banks ,
legal-support@google.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
anderson.cooper@cnn.com
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:25 PM
subject Re: IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 5:25 PM (0 minutes ago)
P.S. To the FBI - Gianelli-Blogonaut appears to be defending “Michael’s uncle” and his connection to meth labs. Kelley
- Hide quoted text -
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI,
Cohen’s legal counsel apparently contacted Blogonaut-Gianelli - who may actually be Joff Belark as I have previously speculated.
Gianelli-Blogonaut has now posted his legal defense. He’s angry and that’s obvious. He has been in contact with Cohen’s legal counsel and Alan Jackson. Do you think Phil Spector will take that lightly? I’m not - why would Phillip? He’s a genius and one of the most brilliant men I have ever met. I think, clearly, that the IRS and FBI should take this man deadly seriously. He is obsessed with me. Sydney is now weighing in again.
All the best,
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
I will have my chronology correct when my legal documents are prepared. Everything is documented by my emails and on these public Blogs.
I don’t care when you returned from Europe. It is irrelevant. The Europeans are quite fortunate that you left.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Apparently you do Sydney. You cannot tear yourself away.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
Who cares about Kelley Lynch? No one.
Kelley Lynch Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
I will have my chronology correct when my legal documents are prepared. Everything is documented by my emails and on these public Blogs.
I don’t care when you returned from Europe. It is irrelevant. The Europeans are quite fortunate that you left.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:29 pm
See Kelley’s cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com site for the entire post in response to “Gianelli-Blogonaut’s” lame legal defense - and confirmation that he was contacted by Cohen’s legal counsel who are apparently monitoring me (no doubt for Cohen).
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2009
Leonard Cohen Is Monioring Me
Kelley Lynch Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
I will have my chronology correct when my legal documents are prepared. Everything is documented by my emails and on these public Blogs.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Why are you writing Rutger and Douglas Penick about your “imminent arrest?” Is that what you actually think or is this some sadistic game you are playing - with me, Phil Spector, that relates to Cohen’s tax fraud and seems to involve the Los Angeles District Attorney, lies to the FBI, and an attempt to demean and insult Agent Sopko.
Kelley Lynch
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Rutger Penick wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
November 27, 2009:
Dear Ms. Lynch:
Good luck with your planned meeting with the FBI/IRS, Rutger and Doug Penick.
However, I really don’t need to know, and don’t care, what you have to say to “Nona”, or any of your other correspondents or to Rutger, Doug, Karen, David, or about Ray Charles Lindsey.
Frankly, I cannot believe I even know who most of these people are.
How about you stop writing me and let the federal authorities take it from here, since my arrest is so “imminent”.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Why Has Gianelli Mentioned Ray Charles Lindsey, A Minor, In The Email He Sent Rutger
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:54 PM
subject Why Has Gianelli Mentioned Ray Charles Lindsey, A Minor, In The Email He Sent Rutger
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 5:54 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS and FBI,
Any thoughts? This is precisely why I want you to interview Ray now. It will protect him - from his father and other people I know are criminals (including Leonard Cohen whose lawyer, Robert Kory, targeted Ray in his custody matter because he witnessed our conversation about tax fraud, missing State of Kentucky tax returns, and their threats).
Gianelli-Blogonaut is one sick, twisted, arrogant individual. I want protection for my family and I want you to take custody of the evidence that has been used to “threaten” Rutger.
All the best,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Why are you writing Rutger and Douglas Penick about your “imminent arrest?” Is that what you actually think or is this some sadistic game you are playing - with me, Phil Spector, that relates to Cohen’s tax fraud and seems to involve the Los Angeles District Attorney, lies to the FBI, and an attempt to demean and insult Agent Sopko.
Kelley Lynch
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Rutger Penick wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
November 27, 2009:
Dear Ms. Lynch:
Good luck with your planned meeting with the FBI/IRS, Rutger and Doug Penick.
However, I really don’t need to know, and don’t care, what you have to say to “Nona”, or any of your other correspondents or to Rutger, Doug, Karen, David, or about Ray Charles Lindsey.
Frankly, I cannot believe I even know who most of these people are.
How about you stop writing me and let the federal authorities take it from here, since my arrest is so “imminent”.
November 28th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
For the record, I did not ask the IRS and/or FBI to meet with me, Rutger, and Douglas Penick who Gianelli-Blogonaut calls “Doug Penick” while attempting to threaten and intimidate his son.
Kelley Lynch
November 28th, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Your message has been sent.
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM
subject Re: Why Has Gianelli Mentioned Ray Charles Lindsey, A Minor, In The Email He Sent Rutger
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 5:59 PM (0 minutes ago)
cc: Gianelli and Blogonut - what’s your motive with my children? Ray is a minor child and his father’s reckless behavior has exposed him to criminals like yourselves. That’s my personal opinion.
November 28th, 2009 at 10:01 pm
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:01 PM
subject Re: Why Has Gianelli Mentioned Ray Charles Lindsey, A Minor, In The Email He Sent Rutger
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 6:01 PM (0 minutes ago)
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Gianelli has written another email to Rutger and Douglas Penick. This is now about the meeting I have asked the IRS and FBI to arrange for my family’s safety and to take custody of the documents that are being used to threaten Rutger.
Love,
Kelley
November 28th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
CHEWY GURU
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:14 PM
subject Re: Why Has Gianelli Mentioned Ray Charles Lindsey, A Minor, In The Email He Sent Rutger
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 6:14 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the Federal Authorities,
Why don’t you take it from here? Gianelli-Blogonaut’s obviously challenging you and realizes that I - and others - are exposed to this lunacy and dangerously unstable people with “motive.” My minor son has now been dragged into this. I guess Gianelli-Blogonaut wanted to be certain that Rutger understood that. I do and Rutger and I think alike. How would I know if Gianelli-Blogonaut’s “arrest” is imminent? He certainly seems to think this is a game - lying to the FBI, attacking and targeting witnesses, and attempting to derail a probable IRS prosecution of tax fraud and other criminal matters. He has even publicly noted that he clearly understands IRS policy bolstering my argument that he contacted Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar in order to determine what the IRS has “pending” with respect to Leonard Cohen. Clearly, Alan Jackson himself would have motive to know that as well. He has used Leonard Cohen in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine in an attempt to support their lame prior bad acts theory that is probably illegal and unconstitutional but works if Fidler’s in your proverbial pocket and willing to throw two trials for the prosecution and tamper with jurors via carefully planned jury instructions. These are my unshakable convictions. No wonder Investigator Frayeh thought Gianelli-Blogonaut found a sympathetic ear with Jackson.
I hope Investigator Frayeh is thrilled to see that my family is now being threatened and targeted and Ray Charles has now been dragged into this - again. He was already targeted in Kory’s Declaration and that is witness tampering, coercion, an attempt to obstruct justice, a bribe - followed up by Sergeant Joe/LAPD who told me to go in and make a deal with Lindsey that would make me happy. I am wondering if Sergeant Joe/LAPD has participated in criminal activity also - or fraud, coercion, etc. Why would he tell me Beverly Hills Police Department was probably also on the SWAT incident and why would he raise concerns about the bail and jail time Lindsey would be subjected to re. my absolutely honest allegations that he is abusive and vicious. Child Services themselves can back that allegation up and was supposed to send him to anger management after hearing that he hit me, hit me in front of the children, and hit Rutger. The woman told me Lindsey was in a rage when he called to tell her I was a great mother and she determined that this matter was harassment on his part. Then, in front of witnesses, Mary Newman had the nerve to tell me she could “charge” me with child abuse because Lindsey hit me in front of the children. That is precisely why I had a lawyer and my Mother present. My Mother understood clearly that Lindsey knows these tactics - he had been through a custody dispute with Jennifer’s mother and lied when he told her for years that her mother abandoned her. Imagine how confusing that made her? I know how angry it made her. So did Cohen - he dictated her letter to me, I saw through that and challenged him and Lindsey on the issue and their “ploy” was defeated and Cohen acknowledged his role in that “apology letter.” She assaulted me, in front of both boys, because I didn’t want her to drive high. Her eyes would get bright red when she smoked marijuana which she did frequently with Christina and Tina - who ended up becoming Lorca Cohen’s friend. Let me assure you of this - Steven Clark Lindsey personally told me that Lorca Cohen turned his daughter onto heroin. Cohen shut his house in Montreal down when he realized her actions (and probably “remarks”) in Montreal while she was attending Concordia. He was obsessed with it and bought the store that is now Boo Radley’s for her. He let the Zen Center use that house in Montreal and regretted it from the moment he did. He bad-mouthed Myokio for years. Myokio is Joshu Sasaki’s nun and representative in Montreal. Follow the logic carefully.
All the best,
Kelley
How about you stop writing me and let the federal authorities take it from here, since my arrest is so “imminent”.
November 28th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
Your message has been sent.
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
CHEWY GURU ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
Nona Banks ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
David Moorhead
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:25 PM
subject Re: Do You Think Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Still In Touch With Cohen’s Legal Counsel
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 6:25 PM (0 minutes ago)
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
Do you think Gianelli-Blogonaut Law Blog received one email from Leonard Cohen’s counsel? Do you think he received one email from Alan Jackson?
This is the man who Bill Pavelic is protecting now. That is my perspective and my opinion.
The lunatic thinks the allegations about Michael’s uncle - with respect to meth labs and a murder (that Michael basically acknowledged related to his uncle who is in the Aryan Nation - are slandering someone. This is a man that Michael believes would murder him. Michael also told me the FBI raided somewhere (he was present and arrested) where a human being was being electrocuted - probably to death but I did not want to hear the rest of this incident. All of this relates to the Aryan Nation, meth labs, the Cartel, and Michael’s family. He himself fears for his life. He thinks John/Jeff’s allegations that he personally murdered a 15 year old (which some people believed, I might add, and those were people who witnessed his conduct, aggression, etc.) are funny comments meant to be twisted into some fabricated story that Ronald Mitchell murdered someone and somehow attempting to engage Boulder PD who Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark have attempted to use to terrorize my son Rutger. Chief Mark Beckner should be clear about that and he should be clear that decent human beings are repulsed when they hear that Boulder PD protected someone with their penis out in front of a child and even took the stand and perjured themselves (not to mention the lies in their reports), etc. The City Attorney protected this person and maliciously attempted to slander and malign me. People immediately refer to the fact that Boulder PD has not resolved the murder and possible sexual molestation of Jean Benet Ramsey. I was told by someone who attended Boulder PD classes for parents that “sexual perverts” are a huge deal with Boulder PD. Explain their conduct in light of that.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Dear Kelley Lynch:
You have your chronology wrong.
We returned from Europe in May of 2009 and received an email from Leonard Cohen’s counsel bringing to our attention scores of posts by you on Blogonaut accusing Mr. Cohen of serious crimes without foundation.
November 28th, 2009 at 10:30 pm
Garrison Courtney - DEA Inbox X
Reply
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
CHEWY GURU ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
Nona Banks ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
David Moorhead
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:28 PM
subject Garrison Courtney - DEA
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 6:28 PM (1 minute ago)
Garrison Courtney,
Good evening. I hope your family is safe and sound and not being targeted as I write this. Do you think Michael’s allegations about his uncle are slander? Does the DEA take meth labs, the Aryan Nation (who the FBI Dallas addressed in their press release), the Cartel, and a man the FBI in Dallas was investigating for a murder lightly? If so, why?
All the best,
Kelley
P.S. How about an insane maniac who publicly stated he murdered a 15 year old and appeared drugged and was frequently drunk when he accosted me and Brie at the Boulder Hostel?
November 28th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to GIANELLI ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Sopko Kelly A TIGTA ,
doronweinberg ,
Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
Kelley Lynch ,
mpduke1@msn.com,
Blogonaut Law-Blog
cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
“m.j. smith” ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
CHEWY GURU ,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
“attorney. general” ,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
“Hank, Larry” ,
“John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
Nona Banks ,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov,
David Moorhead
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:30 PM
subject Re: Garrison Courtney - DEA
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 6:30 PM (0 minutes ago)
For the record, Matt - who witnessed a tremendous amount at the Boulder Hostel, felt that John/Jeff was affiliated with Robert Kory and was some thug investigator who flew in from San Francisco. His tags were on his bags.
November 28th, 2009 at 10:46 pm
The All Out Assault On Phawker.com And Kelley’s Request That The FBI And IRS Protect Her Family
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
ASKDOJ ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
bcc Jewel of Activity
date Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:45 PM
subject The All Out Assault On Phawker.com And Kelley’s Request That The FBI And IRS Protect Her Family
mailed-by gmail.com
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 6:45 PM (0 minutes ago)
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
I think today’s comments are incredibly telling - particularly the interest in Phillip, our last encounter after Clarkson’s suicide and who else was present, the appeal issues (obviously I wasn’t raised in the trial so there’s nothing to “appeal”), Cohen’s tax fraud, the evidence I have now asked the IRS and FBI to take custody of as it is endangering my family and has exposed Rutger to a serious threat - no doubt meant to seriously threaten and intimidate him. I want to sit down with an IRS and FBI agent. I want them to sit down with Rutger. I want them to interview Ray at this time - for his safety. I want them to phone my parents, Karen and David, and Douglas Penick. This is not a lot to ask. They need to take formal possession and custody of the evidence that is clearly so important. Leonard Cohen’s legal counsel contacted Gianelli-Blogonaut. That has been confirmed. Gianelli-Blogonaut has been in touch with Alan Jackson. That has been confirmed. He lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and contacted Agent Sopko (now my “pet” agent - according to Gianelli-Blogonaut) and I believe that was an attempt to determine what the IRS has pending with respect to Cohen’s potential prosecution for valid allegations of criminal tax fraud. I believe there is a legal basis and foundation for charges being brought (re. criminal conduct on the part of him and others) and it is supported by extensive evidence and witnesses.
Gianelli-Blogonaut thinks criminal matters are a game and I believe he attempted to ensnare Agent Wynar/FBI into his web of deceit in an attempt to sabotage and/or assist in sabotaging a potential federal prosecution or prosecutions. I believe he contacted Bruce Cutler in an attempt to determine if Mr. Cutler is in any way still associated with Phil Spector. I believe the Los Angeles District Attorney has the power and motive to attempt to derail a federal prosecution. I know for a fact that they are thugs and I know they are seriously deranged and have no respect, whatsoever, for the IRS, FBI, or anyone else for that matter. That is speculative on my part. And, clearly, I believe all of this relates to Cohen and Phillip’s horrendous set up.
Read through Phawker’s Blog. The posts are extremely relevant. The questions are key and address critical issues and incidents. It is a fishing expedition and a dead on campaign to undermine my credibility as a witness, attempt to threaten and intimidate my children, family, and friends.
I see right through their transparent lies and lame, garbage - yet malicious - tactics.
Love,
Kelley
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214387
November 28th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
BLOGONAUT
WE DON’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP—REALLY
KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?
Opinion—By Blogonaut
It turns out Kelley Lynch is a Johnny-come-lately Phil Spector “supporter”, who may be more motivated by money than friendship. Or is she?
Although the Leonard Cohen nemesis claims that she is a “dear friend” of the music producer, doubts remain.
Phil Spector’s close friends (and even some fans) attended at least one of Spector’s trial sessions as a show of support. Kelley Lynch never showed up once for any of the pretrial proceedings or any of the trial days for the two nine month trials—even though the Spectors were urging fans and friends to drop by and show their support on their website. Nor has Lynch been to visit her “dear friend” in prison since his conviction on murder charges earlier this year.
About two or three months before the end of the second Spector murder trial Kelley Lynch launched her first blog that she entitled “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch”, a site that assumed that Spector would be acquitted and then Phil Spector would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team to JOIN Lynch in suing her imagined enemies, including the LAPD, and in suing Cohen. (The site has since been removed by Google.)
Kelley Lynch has tried to make a case that her legal woes and Phil Spector’s legal problems were intertwined.
Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.
Of course, Leonard Cohen never testified against Phil Spector, and Phil Spector’s legal team never raised any claim that there was perjured testimony before the grand jury that indicted the music producer in the trial court—thus waiving that as a legal issue (if it ever was one).
It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, sue the bastards that Lynch claims have “destroyed my life” life.
But, of course, it is fantasy constructed on the thinnest of foundations, because there never was any “linkage” between Kelley Lynch’s legal troubles and those of the music producer—except that Lynch and Spector knew each other (it is not clear how well) years ago, and (she claims) dined together (in addition to how many others she has not said) after Clarkson’s death.
That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).
The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.
Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.
In other words, Lynch (at least in our view) has her hand out plain and simple.
That core motivation, in our opinion, is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.
BTW, some of you may notice that we have not posted on this subject in some time, but with over 100 emails in our inbox (several within the hour) from Kelley Lynch disparaging this blog and demanding our attorney’s “disbarment”, “arrest” and “prosecution” for daring to disagree with Kelley Lynch’s far out views—all cc’d to the IRS, Treasury agent Sopko, the Department of Justice, the Governor of Colorado and many others—we decided it is once again time to join the internet discussion about Ms. Lynch raging on other sites.
We welcome your views in the comments.
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 11:28 AM 20 COMMENTS
FAMED TEXAS TRIAL LAWYER JOHN O QUINN DEAD AFTER SUV CRASH
****Breaking*****
Texas trial lawyer John O Quinn has died as the result of the SUV he was driving at high speed in the rain leaving the road, the ABA Journal Reports.
Quinn’s employee, Johnny Cutliff, was also killed in the crash.
According to media reports, Quinn was driving more than 30 miles per hour over the published 40 MPH speed limit at the time of the single vehicle accident.
John O’Quinn is widely acknowledged as one of the most accomplished trial lawyers of his time, holding some of the largest verdicts and settlements in the country.
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 12:55 PM 1 COMMENTS
PAGEANT LAWYER USES SEX TAPE TO FORCE EX-MISS CALIFORNIA’S LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT-SOURCES REPORT
From the ABA Journal
Former Miss California Carrie Prejean is accepting a lot less than the $1 million she sought in her lawsuit against pageant organizers because lawyers for the beauty pageant obtained, and used, a “solo sex tape” featuring the beauty in settlement negotiations—the ABA Journal, citing CNN reports.
Read More
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 4:38 PM 2 COMMENTS
LAWYER WHO CHOKED DOG, BEAT WIFE IS STATE BAR PANEL MEMBER
Nevada State Bar hearing panelist, dog choker, wife beater, and common drunk Ed Miley, Esq.
We recently posted about the arrest of Vegas criminal defense lawyer Ed Miley for getting white-trash-drunk, choking the family dog, assaulting his wife, then discharging a firearm into the backyard (pretty much in that order)—our angle being the irony of the beaten spouse being Judge Stephanie Miley, the Vegas jurist who was voted in last year to replace disgraced (and later defrocked) Vegas Judge Elizabeth Halverson, whose husband also beat the 425-500 pound former jurist that everyone loves to hate. (See here and here.)
We now post to inform of the further irony in the case—that being the new info that thuggish wife beater, common drunk, and choker of gentle family pets Ed Miley, amazingly, for the last 12 years has served on a bar disciplinary panel that sits in judgment of Southern Nevada (i.e. Vegas) lawyers who allegedly transgress—er—get caught transgressing—Nevada bar ethics rules (such as they are in the “All For Our Country” state).
According to today’s article in the Las Vegas Sun news paper (that also describes the misdemeanor “citation” of a Vegas “attorney” who was disbarred in two Midwestern states, but never licensed in Nevada):
“[Mr. Miley] is well versed in how his profession deals with a lawyer who, like himself, winds up being charged with crimes.
“It turns out that for the past 12 years, Miley — who’s facing felony and misdemeanor charges stemming from an Oct. 1 altercation with his wife of 12 years, District Judge Stefany Miley — has been a member of the State Bar’s local disciplinary board.
“He’s among a pool of 49 lawyers in Southern Nevada who are called upon from time to time to hand out punishments to their colleagues who have run afoul of the standards of their profession.”
Why we are not surprised?
Read more.
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 10:57 AM 0 COMMENTS
LABELS: ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?
IVY LEAGUERS TEAR PROFESSOR JONES TO PIECES OVER POORLY WRITTEN COMPLAINT AGAINST ABOVE THE LAW BLOG
11-4-2009 UPDATE, via Above the Law:
Breaking: Jones v. Minkin Dismissed!!!(Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses lawsuit against ATL.)
Apparently, Professor Jones tired of the 24 hours of verbal pummeling that he was receiving from all corners of the Blogosphere and saw the handwriting on the wall regarding where his suit was headed–i.e the world’s most frivolous lawsuits bin. Anyhow, its over.
In case you missed the major blawg story of the day (and probably the year) University of Miami law professor D. Marvin Jones —who made the pages of this blog when he was arraigned on charges that he allegedly solicited a hooker—has the law Blogosphere’s panties in a twist over his lawsuit against the legal blog Above the Law and its founding editor David Lat.
Adding an additional layer of hilarity to the already embarrassing circumstances of professor Jones’ arraignment on criminal charges is the astounding fact that a law professor would file a federal court complaint riddled with spelling and grammatical errors (he misspells the President’s name in the fist paragraph and goes downhill from there), let alone that attempts to set forth a legal theory that the Supreme Court of his own home State of Florida refused to recognize just last year.
We are not big fans of the self described “most prestigious law school discussion board in the world”–AutoAdmit, but we could not make our way through even part of this thread without laughing so hard we nearly peed our pants.
Suffice it to say that the comments were, well, a tad harsh.
As once commenter posted:
“Before I read [professor Jones’ complaint], I expected to respond to your post by saying that pleadings are the one place where you can write like shit and get away with it. “But after reading that festering shit pile, I agree that UM should be deeply embarrassed.”
And another:
“This complaint is truly a disgrace, and I am not even talking about fucking typos. Apparently, he really believes that statements such as “Or Donald Marvin Jones.” are sentences. This complaint is truly truly terrible. I hope he wrote it while completely intoxicated and then put it in a mailbox to the court for fling, forgetting that he had done so and leaving him no opportunity for sober reflection. It is the only excuse.”
Our favorite:
“dear god. how the hell did this guy become a law professor”
Now go, read, laugh, cry. We did.
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 6:10 PM 4 COMMENTS
Congratulations kid, you broke your cherry….
Dear David Lat:
How can you call yourself a tabloidst™ if you have never been subjected to a ridiculous lawsuit by an apparently semi-literate pro se litigant who does not have a leg to stand on, and [in our opinion] cannot plead his way out of a proverbial paper bag?
Well, it is a badge of honor.
Wear it proudly, while you enjoy the support of the rest of us in the blogging community—all of us.
Blogonaut will have more, much more, to say about this hilarious Pearson-esque lawsuit later.
In the meantime, as we stated in our initial post, “it’s a hard life for a pro per.” Let alone a PUBLIC FIGURE, pro se litigant swimming upstream from the United States Supreme Court decision in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Let alone a constitutional law professor who can only come off as less than knowledgeable in his own [self-professed] field of expertise, should he, as we predict, lose this case.
Go David go!!!!!!
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 11:34 AM 0 COMMENTS
Older Posts
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
BLOGONAUT FEATURES
Phillip Spector Appeal Watch
When Clowns Go Bad
Blogonaut’s Greatest Hits
QUESTIONS? NEWS TIPS? CONTACT BLOGONAUT:
blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com
BLOG ARCHIVE
blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com
November 28th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
DEAR GOD - SHE’S RUN OUT OF WORDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 28th, 2009 at 11:41 pm
How does Anonymous know I’m “harassing” Alan Jackson and why is this harassment? Is that Alan Jackson’s position being publicly stated and, if not, why hasn’t Al Jackson done anything to distance himself from the comment?
Anonymous said…
She’s harassing Alan Jackson.
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
NOVEMBER 27, 2009 12:41 PM
Susanne Walsh - also on Phawker.com, the Hartford Courant, and other sites slandering me and lying about me.
sanneka said…
Wonderful Blogonaut, you have been more patient and decent to this woman than anybody could reasonable expect.
Hopefully this blog will finalize Kelley Lynch’s hobby and career as a full time slanderer.
Susanne
November 27, 2009 12:15 PM
Who is anonymously posting the same lame comments that I am dangerous to myself and others. Hasn’t Steven Clarkson Lindsey and LAPD already tried this lame tactic out? This is a deadly serious and viable threat. This is also why I want to meet - immediately - with an IRS agent and FBI agent.
Anonymous said…
I’m shocked she is still around and hasn’t been put away. She is a danger to herself and others.
November 27, 2009 12:36 PM
Monitoring my Blog - they have previously been targeted (as have my email accounts - containing “evidence” so it is destruction of evidence technically):
Anonymous said…
Is this her blog again? How come she is able to start another one?
http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/
Isn’t KL the cyberterrorist?
November 27, 2009 12:54 PM
How could Sydney, who is posting on Phawker, write that no one will respond to me on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Blog when he has been posting all day and has - yet again - contacted Rutger? Why would someone be monitoring a “raving lunatic” so utterly and intensely. It appears that they are obsessed with me. They descended, like hawks, onto Phawker.com. The King Drew matter is a deadly serious issue. Obviously.
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214393
Sydney said…
Heh heh - I wonder how long it will take her to figure out no one is responding to her. If/when she does figure it out, and I’m sure she will eventually, I’ve decided not to directly comment on anything she writes. I will only comment directly to other posters. I’ve surely had my fill of reading what sounds very much like the lunatic ravings heard in lock-down wards of psych units. Hope everyone is enjoying the holiday season.
November 27, 2009 2:21 PM
Gratuitous and lame. Ignore me - they are following me, monitoring me, on the internet - and Blogonaut-Gianelli has now publicly confirmed that Cohen - via his emails - is.
Sydney said…
Yes, Anonymous 12:54, KL is definitely the cyber-terrorist - probably the worst one ever present. I am grateful that Blogonaut has pulled us away from her grips and gripes. And Sanneka, glad to see you here, too. Maybe if we all ignore her, she’ll go away and find other people to bother.
November 27, 2009 2:25 PM
I think I’ve said enough on the subject of people who disagree with me. Gianelli spent quite a lot of time on Thanksgiving posting about me, other relevant matters, and writing emails to Rutger. He knows my emails to him are an attempt to address his lies, slander, etc. If I’m not mistaken, Blogonaut is Gianelli and they are one and the same. The comments about “our attorney” do say something about this individual’s “character.” I pointed out that lying to the FBI is a federal crime - as is ensnaring an FBI agent in an attempt to sabotage a pending federal prosecution with the full knowledge and awareness of IRS policy not to comment on pending prosecutions.
Blogonaut said…
We appreciate your support, and participation here.
You might find this a “quieter” forum without all the “noise”.
BTW, Lynch wrote us on Thanksgiving to say she was not emailing this blog anymore but did 3 minutes later, and she said the same thing again today, but has since send us at least a half dozen emails.
Our attorney responded, via reply all, to an email quoting one of our Phawker posts as “admitting” that we had threatened KL.
We pointed out that communicating falsely with federal officials is potentially a felony offense, and in our opinion hundreds of false complaints to federal law enforcement that bloggers who simply disagree with her are guilty of “witness tampering” or “cyber-terrorism” qualify as false statements.
November 27, 2009 3:24 PM
Why would I attempt to post on Blogonaut’s Blog. He continues to acknowledge receipt of my emails and has confirmed, via his posts, that he’s reading my statements addressing his lies, etc., on Phawker.com.
Sydney said…
Blogonaut, if KL tries to post here on your site, will you post it or ignore her?
November 27, 2009 4:03 PM
Saw this one coming. “Sydney” works in tandem with Gianelli-Blogonaut. It sets up the next post and or attempts to dismiss a post of Gianelli-Blogonaut’s or someone else’s as frivolous or irrevant. What does Gianelli-Blogonaut mean by the “internet outlets” that I have left? I assume it means they are monitoring everything I say on the internet and this is a well organized campaign of cyber-terrorism meant to silence and terrorize me, threaten my family, etc. that is nothing other than witness tampering, witness harassment, witness intimidation, witness retaliation, an attempt to obstruct justice, etc. - that relates to Cohen and the Phil Spector murder trial that I know is a set up.
Blogonaut said…
Kelley Lynch has been banned from posting on this site.
She has spewed (and continues to spew) quite enough hate and slander to the few internet outlets that she has left.
November 27, 2009 4:06 PM
Why has Gianelli-Blogonaut banned me and yet is posting - for me - on his Blog. I think it’s because he is an “arrogant idiot.” He is fixated on the IRS, the meeting I have requested with an IRS and FBI agent, and the evidence - probably - that has been raised and used to threaten Rutger. I think one very valid point is Rutger was not attempting to hide anything. Another valid point is that my family will be safer when the IRS/FBI takes possession and custody of the remaining evidence.
Blogonaut said…
Here is Kl’s laters IRS mail received in our in-box just moments ago. (Of course, she cc’d it to here usual spam email list, including federal law enforcment, govenors, attorneys, media, and many others:
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
“What happens if these aren’t false allegations? Is there a downside for me then? See the obsessed wacked out nut’s latest bullshit below.
“Please send an IRS agent and FBI agent to mee me, Rutger, interview Ray, and to phone my parents, Karen, David, and Douglas. I don’t want to see a post like Sean Ogden’s in the future where my kids seem to have been pushed over the edge about this “fucking trial.” That’s why I would never in a million years want a reward. There is no money on earth that can address what is going on here.
“All the best,
Kelley”
November 27, 2009 4:40 PM
As you know, Lindsey told me Superfon was going to the IRS to report this for a “reward.” I addressed that with Agent Sopko and her partner. I’m alienating the people who are monitoring me, stalking me, and have descended on Phawker.com, and can’t tear themselves away. They are positively obsessed with me and seem rather aggressive and possibly dangerously unstable. Sydney is thanking Gianelli-Blogonaut for editing me and only posting things the way he wants it “framed.” Emphasis on “framed.”
Sydney said…
She won’t accept a reward?? A REWARD??? For what? Setting a record for alienating more people on-line than anyone ever has before?? Thanks for the up-date; and also, thank you for not allowing free access to KL. I wonder how she’ll feed her psychosis now.
November 27, 2009 7:00 PM
I’ve been explicit that I will not accept an IRS and/or award for being a whistle blower which is a concept I hate. I spoke to Agent Betzer/IRS about this in 2005.
Blogonaut said…
We think that she means she will not accept a reward from the IRS, but it is not explicit what she means.
November 27, 2009 8:17 PM
I have every intention of getting a hold of Judge Marvin Katz who I worked with. I do not consider him a close friend but I do consider him to be a man that I knew well and who knew me well. I worked for him. I intend to phone Marvin at his office in Philadelphia and I want to discuss what is going on here and the fact that Rutger has now been threatened with respect to evidence relating to a potential IRS prosecution of Cohen and others. He is a federal judge and will understand the issues. He is also inconceivably brilliant and does not have one frivolous bone in his body. He is fastidiously attentive to details and a fierce man and powerful adversary. I spent hours upon hours hanging out in his office. He pointed out that every woman in the office was going to quit because of the attention he gave me, the time we spent together - primarily on his Mother’s estate, and probably - the training he gave me also. We shall see if Marvin Katz gives me his email address. I will fax him certain documents prior to calling him.
Anonymous said…
Kelley Lynch is now bragging on Phawker that she is going to contact a federal judge, who she says is a close friend:
“I am calling a friend of mine this week. His name is Marvin Katz and he is a federal judge in Philadelphia. I helped him settle his Mother’s estate when I was quite young and know him quite well.”
This could get interesting if she gets ahold of Judge Katz’s email address.
November 28, 2009 10:45 AM
Desperately monitoring my actions and whereabouts.
Anonymous said…
Dear November 27, 2009 12:36 PM:
Unfortunately, her family humors and ignores her, so she is not even aware that she has a problem.
If things get difficult for her in one part of the country, she picks up and moves to another.
November 28, 2009 10:47 AM
I am calling the Honorable Marvin Katz - after I fax him a handful of relevant documents. He should have no trouble getting this immediately. He also happens to have an excellent sense of humor and really kind heart. He’ll really understand the IRS and their policies also. If Marvin Katz thinks any of this is spammed he should immediately retire.
Internal Revenue Service, Assistant to the Commissioner, 1977 - 1981
Anonymous said…
Hon. Marvin Katz
Current: Judge, Federal DistrictCourt, Eastern District of Pennslyvania
Position:
Senior Judge, since August 26, 1997
Education:
Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, 1954
LL.B., Bachelor of Law
LR: Note and Comment Editor, Yale Law Journal
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1951
B.A., Bachelor of Arts
Affiliations:
Philadelphia Bar Association, Member
Pennsylvania Bar Association, Member
American Bar Association, Member
Past Positions:
Mesirov, Gelman, Jaffe, Cramer & Jamieson, Philadelphia, Counsel and Partner in Law, 1981 - 1983
Special Partner in Law, 1981
Internal Revenue Service, Assistant to the Commissioner, 1977 - 1981
Partner in Law, 1962 - 1977
Private Practice, 1954 - 1977
Hon. Francis X. McClanaghan, Court of Common Pleas, Law Clerk, 1959 - 1960
Associate in Law, 1954 - 1959
Fraternities/Sororities:
Phi Beta Kappa
Yes indeed, November 28, 2009 10:45AM, this could get interesting if she starts spamming Katz with her bizare nonsense.
November 28, 2009 11:02 AM
Addressed this boring and lame defense/post on Phawker.com already:
Blogonaut said…
Dear Kelley Lynch:
You have your chronology wrong.
Why would Marvin Katz take action against me for calling him and explaining some issues that I am dealing with? Is he now insane and stupid? If this is Marvin Katz’s opinion I’m going to ask Phil Spector to take out a billboard addressing this in Philadelphia with Marvin’s photograph.
Sydney said…
Can’t wait to see what she says to Judge Katz. I do suspect if she does, she will only get away with it a few times before he takes action against her. And the beat goes on…
November 28, 2009 3:37 PM
It is unbelievable, to me, that Clarkson shot herself at Phillip’s house on the same day - a number of years later - that Rutger lost his fingers. Why do I always think of prosecutor Al Jackson when Kelly Green weighs in? It’s issues are extremely interesting to me. The fact that I know Phil Spector is evidence that we have “karma” and our lives have been intertwined - including the fact that someone left an anonymous tip about my friendship with Phillip for the District Attorney (a woman). I wonder why Al Jackson isn’t aware of this fact? His investigators are. The first paragraph was a set up for the real issue - how does Cohen fit into the equation. Jackson should be able to figure out why Cohen was brought up in his Motion in Limine. Gratuitous nonsense - the remark about it being Cohen’s fault that Spector had a gun in his home. There is evidence it was not Phil Spector’s gun so perhaps Jackson should talk to Jay Romaine and/or Bill Pavelic. They’re “gunning” for Rutger. If Cohen hadn’t stolen from me and destroyed my life - after I refused his offer of 50% community property that I viewed as a bribe - Rutger would have been in college full time and would not have been forced to take a job at Whole Foods. People follow this logic and, in particular, Rutger feels this way (as do his friends who witnessed much of the insanity). I figured out how Cohen fits into this equation. Why can’t Jackson or Kelly Green? Detectives visited Cohen about his comments, over the years, regarding Phil Spector and there must be a report or reports of that interview. Can’t someone in the District Attorney’s office get those reports? That seems quite odd. It would prove that Cohen’s a liar. Period.
kellygreen said…
As usual, I’m late for the party.
Well, this clears up everything. According to Lynch, she and Spector are in this together—sit down and brace yourselves for this—because “after all, Rutger lost his fingers the same day (a few years apart) that Clarkson shot herself at Spector’s house and their karma is clearly intertwined.” Yes, that clears up everything!
But how does Cohen fit into the equation? Oh, that’s right—it’s Cohen’s fault Rutger lost his fingers and it’s Cohen’s fault that Spector had a gun in his home.
November 28, 2009 3:35 PM
Blogonaut’s fixated on his self-proclaimed “imminent arrest” - for serious federal crimes if I’m viewing his activity correctly. I believe I am. His communications with Jackson and Cohen’s legal counsel are crucial evidence. I advised them not to destroy this evidence because I think they’re liars and criminals who will do anything. I also know they’re dangerous because I was held hostage by a SWAT team, dragged to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and law enforcement appears to have been used (perhaps willingly) as foot soldiers for the District Attorney who has motive to flee the jurisdiction for Sacramento. I don’t know if Gianelli-Blogonaut has a strange pathology but I suppose that’s one way to look at a man I view as a “criminal.”
Blogonaut said…
Kelley Lynch has a strange pathology for sure + a freak show/train wreck quality that is at once arresting as it is horrifying.
Quite a piece of work.
November 28, 2009 5:03 PM
Green forgot to address something so Sydney’s setting the stage for that. Cohen has publicly stated that he was not accusing me of theft. That needs to be addressed, with him, on the witness stand as does the massive tax hit that Brian Johnson raised and Cohen’s reference to “the plan” he and Greenberg had. The FBI Duty Agent in Denver sure knew what he was talking about when we discussed how people trap themselves using the news media and when he cautioned me that lawyers will attempt to use various ploys that relate to evidence - such as, I suppose, threatening Rutger. Cohen stole my intellectual property and this is documented and supported by corporate books, records, notarized documents signed by him, memorandums, emails, etc., etc., etc. - much of which has been provided to the IRS and others. The “banned” comment is stupid. I know of no other Blog (unrelated to Gianelli-Blogonaut, Michelle Blaine’s mControl) that I was “banned” from. I hold Leonard Cohen and Steven Clark Lindsey personally responsible for the outright assault on me by law enforcement and the fact that I ended up homeless. I do not know how Sydney can state, publicly and for the record, that “no one in the IRS and FBI responds” to me. How would an absolute stranger know who does or does not respond to me or how the IRS and FBI thinks? Can the IRS and/or FBI explain that - to me.
Sydney said…
And don’t forget kellygreen, it’s Cohen’s fault that she stole all that money from him. It’s also Cohen’s fault that she keeps getting banned from numerous blogs; also his fault she keeps getting arrested; his fault again that no one in the IRS and FBI responds to her displays of madness; and, once more, his fault she wanders from homeless shelter to homeless shelter. Wonder how long it’s been since she has lived in the real world?
November 28, 2009 4:05 PM
They make it up - really.
November 28th, 2009 at 11:52 pm
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Bill Pavelic
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 3:51 AM
Hello Bill,
Want to see the latest insanity on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s insane Blog about me? He has been in touch with Cohen’s legal counsel and Alan Jackson. He has used your email to him (about me) in an attempt to undermine me. Rutger has, no doubt, seen that email. Why don’t you drop over to Rutger’s house, Bill? Perhaps you - a man - would like to discern the type of stress he’s under. He happens to be convinced this is an IRS matter and nothing other than an IRS matter that relates directly to Leonard Cohen, Steve Lindsey, and Phil Spector. Better yet, Bill, why don’t you write Rutger and explain your comments to Gianelli-Blogonaut who has now emailed Rutger and dragged my minor son Ray into this or is attempting to have Rutger believe Ray may be exposed to threats and/or targeted by these people. That’s my assumption.
Sydney’s obsessed with me and this story, Bill. She’s on Phawker attacking me and Blogonaut’s Blog. Kelly Green, who reminds me of “Alan Jackson,” is on both Blogs - as are Gianelli-Blogonaut, Susanne Walsh, and probably others posting “anonymously” that I’m “harassing” Alan Jackson. Do you think Alan Jackson harassed Phil Spector? How about the forensic scientists he attacked and slandered? Do you think they felt harassed by Alan Jackson. I thought one of them looked as though he could get off the witness stand and hit Alan Jackson which probably was a reasonable response to this situation. Where’s Cooley hiding, Bill? These are deadly serious issues and they are not frivolous. Should I believe that Cooley doesn’t know anything about these issues? Investigator Frayeh confirmed that he gave my letter to Alan Jackson to the recipients I asked him to - that would be THE District Attorney Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, and Truc Do.
Thank you very much for writing Gianelli-Blogonaut and supporting his onslaught of vicious and malicious gossip meant to undermine my credibility as a witness in a potential federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen for tax fraud that I was told and believe is criminal. I also believe the “asshole” has attempted to derail that prosecution and ensnared Agent Wynar/FBI although he may not have done so successfully.
Kelley Lynch
Sydney Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
DEAR GOD - SHE’S RUN OUT OF WORDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kelley Lynch Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
November 28th, 2009 at 11:41 pm
How does Anonymous know I’m “harassing” Alan Jackson and why is this harassment? Is that Alan Jackson’s position being publicly stated and, if not, why hasn’t Al Jackson done anything to distance himself from the comment?
Anonymous said…
She’s harassing Alan Jackson.
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
November 28th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Stephen Gianelli-Blogonaut
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 3:53 AM
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Try to use your insane copyright logic to argue that I can’t address your slander and lies - including in a court of law.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 12:31 am
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Pick Up The Documents Now - They Are Recklessly Endangering My Family
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 4:15 AM
P.S. Maybe Cohen and Lindsey should have thought about THEM before they engaged in their criminal conduct. For the record, that is my firm, fierce, and unshakable conviction and belief. Pick up YOUR evidence. Enough is enough.
November 29th, 2009 at 12:33 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Pick Up The Documents Now - They Are Recklessly Endangering My Family
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 4:19 AM
To the IRS and FBI,
Let me finish addressing Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest round of threats meant to intimidate my family. He didn’t like the fact that Nona Banks correctly wrote me that these are lunatics. He should have thought about that earlier. Nona Banks knows me. I see he views her, as do I, as a “witness.”
What kind of feeling could Gianelli-Blogonaut have about the IRS, FBI, Justice Department, Agent Sopko, Governor RItter and the Mayor of Houston. Does he know them and does he speak for them? He knows they’re copied in on my emails, however, and he knows this is real. He probably knows how Alan Jackson feels, however. When Alan Jackson tells me why I was dragged to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector and who falsified the report I will never contact him again in this lifetime. How can Gianelli-Blogonaut state that I am spamming the IRS, the FBI, the Justice Department, Agent Sopko (now lower case “a”), Governor Ritter and/or the Mayor of Houston. I would like to know if Phil Spector thinks I’m spamming the man he has declared publicly is a murderer.
Kelley
I have a feeling that the IRS, the FBI, The Justice Department, agent Sopko, Governor Ritter, the mayor of Houston, prosecutor Alan Jackson, and the many others on your spam email CC list do not much care either.
Please do not email this office or Blogonaut in the future. I do not know with whom your are meeting, nor do I need to know what “Nona” (who obviously has not known you long—or if she has much about you) thinks.
I have a feeling that the IRS, the FBI, The Justice Department, agent Sopko, Governor Ritter, the mayor of Houston, prosecutor Alan Jackson, and the many others on your spam email CC list do not much care either.
Finally, neither Blogonaut nor this office has “targeted” your adult son Rutger Penick. That sounds nice and dramatic, but is a false statement.
November 29th, 2009 at 12:34 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Pick Up The Documents Now - They Are Recklessly Endangering My Family
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 4:33 AM
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
Be clear about this. It does not sound dramatic. It sounds criminal.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 12:36 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Pick Up The Documents Now - They Are Recklessly Endangering My Family
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, anderson.cooper@cnn.com
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 4:21 AM
He has clearly targeted Rutger.
November 29th, 2009 at 12:40 am
— On Sat, 11/28/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Here You Go Bill Pavelic - Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Using You Publicly … Presumably to Threaten Rutger Further
To: billpavelic@aol.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, “Maurice Smith” , “Duane”
Cc: “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com
Date: Saturday, November 28, 2009, 1:11 AM
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Excuse, what do my emails have to do with the fact that you publicly stated that you would remove Alan Jackson. I have not mentioned that you have included my teacher, Ron Burkle, and others - including Rutger. Trust me, I know you want to push him to his breaking point and he has been threatened. Why are you writing me about my sister, my brother-in-law, my ex-husband, and my son. They do not know you and I can assure you (because I know them) that no one thinks the fact that Rutger was threatened with prison (over evidence that I want an IRS agent and FBI agent to pick up from me - even if it’s just copies … which it is) and aiding and abetting criminal acts is anything but a deadly serious issue.
Rutger wrote and asked you not to contact him and stated, very clearly, that he felt you are threatening him.
Bill Pavelic and others can speak for themselves. I am uninterested in anything about Alan Jackson except for your potential connection to him - with respect to the instant matters.
For the record, Rutger has personally written to the IRS (previously). I think they are clear about his feelings and I think they are clear that the IRS doesn’t intimidate him - or anyone for that matter. Having said that - as his Mother I believe you have posted the above remarks and emailed my son today in order to attempt to intimidate him, threaten him, and attempt to push him to his breaking point.
I have absolutely asked the IRS and FBI to send agents to sit down - independently - with me, Rutger, interview Ray at his father’s house, properly collect the evidence that remains (copies of documents that Cohen, I would imagine, has but he hasn’t given me an inventory - and neither has the Sheriff’s Department of the evidence that Raoul Felder thought was probably illegally seized …) and note that they have not been “altered” (ridiculous lie and/or allegation but predictable - not a defense however), and phone my sister, her husband, and of course Douglas Penick who you are not on a friendly basis with so why are you referring to him in the more familiar “Doug” manner?
The reason you can’t follow some of the legal arguments (such as Raoul Felder’s theory of an illegal seizure of documents) or why I do not believe I will be raised on appeal - because I wasn’t raised an “the record” - speaks volumes about you and says nothing about an excellent attorney like Mr. Felder.
Is there something wrong with the IRS having Rutger’s email address? He pays his taxes and the IRS wasn’t, last I heard, terrorizing him or threatening him with prison.
You have now opened a new thread (all lies that I have addressed) on your Blog. You have written me further emails - that are preposterous and pompous which is precisely how I view you. And yet - you’re not obsessed with me, right? A girlfriend of mine nailed this early early on when she told me she had never seen an obsession like you had for me.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Do your ex-husband Doug Penick, your sister Karen Lynch and your brother-in-law David McCourt know that you are publishing their names and email addresses on the internet, and that you have also published Rutger Penick’s email address not only to us but scores of others, including the IRS?
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
PS: “For the record” you copied us with an email over two days ago saying you were removing Alan Jackson, Bill Pavelic, and others (including this blog) from your spam email list–and you are still emailing all three of us 20 times or more a day.
November 29th, 2009 at 12:43 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Here You Go Bill Pavelic - Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Using You Publicly … Presumably to Threaten Rutger Further
To: billpavelic@aol.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, “Maurice Smith” , “Duane”
Cc: “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 4:42 AM
I don’t know Gianelli-Blogonaut,
But the IRS might want to know why you have included them in this Blog posting of yours - that is clearly threatening my family members and ex-husband and relates to a possible IRS matter. This is meant to intimidate and threaten my family.
You sound desperate and dangerously unhinged to me. Maybe YOU should have thought about that.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Do your ex-husband Doug Penick, your sister Karen Lynch and your brother-in-law David McCourt know that you are publishing their names and email addresses on the internet, and that you have also published Rutger Penick’s email address not only to us but scores of others, including the IRS?
November 29th, 2009 at 12:47 am
Let’s ask Phil Spector - on the witness stand.
Post a Comment On: Blogonaut”KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?”
20 Comments - Anonymous said…
She’s harassing Alan Jackson.
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
November 27, 2009 12:41 PM
November 29th, 2009 at 12:54 am
Kelley Lynch says:
Redlined Copy – 10-06-09
Kelley Lynch
odzerchenma3@gmail.com
September 21, 2009
Alan Jackson
District Attorney’s Office
County of Los Angeles
210 Temple Street
Suite 18000
Los Angeles, California 90012-3210
Re: Kelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles, et al.
Alan Jackson:
I am in receipt of your email dated September 9, 2009 demanding that I remove you from my email “recipients list.” My emails, as I have repeatedly stated, document the destruction of my life, the destruction of my children and parent’s lives, the targeting of my family, etc., due solely to the fact that I was told Leonard Norman Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and reported that to the IRS and others.
I can assure you that all matters involving Cohen and myself are IRS matters and there is no need for me to “convert” anything into a tax matter. I would not be in an adversarial position with Cohen had I not reported his tax fraud and, instead, accepted 50% community property, illegally mediated and/or participated in what I believed was criminal conduct. I am absolutely convinced that Ray Charles alleged custody matter arose from and relates to Cohen’s tax fraud and the Phil Spector murder trial. I refused to cave into extremely vicious coercive tactics – such as those used against me in Ray Charles Lindsey’s unconscionably vicious custody matter that I view as a kidnapping. Robert Kory, Cohen’s lawyer, has a Declaration filed in that matter but he does not know my son. He did, however, note that he and Cohen did not want to be “identified” as the individuals encouraging Steven Clark Lindsey to take Ray away from me. I am absolutely convinced that I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to prevent me from testifying against Cohen in any IRS or other matter - whether it is currently “pending” or not. How would anyone, other than the IRS, know what is or is not a pending matter? I am not convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and/or the Treasury Department are engaged in a major prank and feel it would be prudent to assume that there may very well be serious issues at hand. Sergeant Joe _____________/LAPD monitored my only visit with my son Ray in approximately July 2005. He raised issues relating to domestic violence (Steve Clark Lindsey’s issues) and advised me to go into Daniel A. Bergman’s law office and make a deal that would make me happy. Sergeant Joe _____________/LAPD is the officer that told me, at that time, that LAPD hid evidence (a car and possibly a gun wrapped in a blanket) in the Biggie Smalls “wrongful death” matter. I brought that allegation to the attention of your office and others – including Bradley Gage and the Department of Justice. Sergeant Joe __________/LAPD told me he liked me and both of my boys and did not want to charge me for the fraudulent monitored visit clearly meant to intimidate both me and my sons. It was and remains an unconscionable situation that demands an investigation – that would include his allegations regarding Christopher Wallace’s death. I believe Detective Russell Poole brought his concerns regarding the “murder” of Biggie Smalls to your office’s attention. I reported what Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD told me because it seemed both deadly serious and dangerous.
In any event, I intend to litigate this situation and my lawsuits will address the fact that my life has been destroyed because I had the audacity to report Cohen’s tax fraud and am a friend of Phil Spector’s. Cohen seems to think Phil Spector and I will take the fall for him. He is sadly mistaken. At the very heart of this matter – from my perspective - is the District Attorney’s need to keep Leonard Norman Cohen credible. Cohen, from my perspective, is a calculated fraud, pathological liar, pervert, and utterly overwhelming control freak.
Not only do I believe Cohen committed tax fraud with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, possibly Old Ideas, LLC, in connection with other entities, and personally, I believe he may have a lifelong history of tax fraud in the United States and Canada. In fact, I emailed the IRS Commissioner’s Staff a 1977 tax memo prepared specifically for “Cohen” advising him that he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had residences but cautioning him not to have a green card. Cohen had a green card and informed me that he abandoned it sometime after Marty Machat’s death because the IRS does not ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada does. This might explain why he applied for and obtained a new green card in 1991. It might also explain the social security number insanity his accountant, Burt Goldstein, sorted out after Marty Machat’s death in 1988. Marty Machat was Phil Spector and Cohen’s attorney and I worked for him from approximately 1984 until his death in April 1988. There is no doubtin my mind that Cohen planned to blame Martin Machat, after his death, for any issues relating to U.S. tax issues, Immigration, and/or Social Security matters. The lengths Cohen went to obtain a new green card were extraordinary. – including his attempt to obtain one through L.C. Stranger Music, Inc.
Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, appears to follow him from adviser to adviser. He also has a pattern of blaming advisers and stealing from them. I provided Boies Schiller with Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting a $30,000.00 final payment for his and Bob Johnston’s share of Stranger Music, Inc. Unfortunately, when Cohen sold Leonard Cohen Stranger Music, Inc. and Bad Monk Publishing Company to Sony he did not inform me that he was selling Mr. Machat and Mr. Johnston’s shares. I believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should review that sale and, specifically, look into why Cohen and Westin were concerned about issues relating to the assignments of copyrights into Bad Monk Publishing. I also believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should look into the failed C.A.K. bond deal and the formation of Cohen’s two charitable remainder trusts. Ed Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, was concerned about personal service contracts and other legal issues relating to the charitable remainder trusts. Robert Kory advised me, at our luncheon, that I had a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers, that there was fraud on every entity, and confirmed my suspicions: the holding periods were illegal. Kory also emailed me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to questions, relating to Cohen’s taxes, going back many years. I was told by Steve Blanq of Hochman, Rettig that Richard Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, made an Ogden, Utah IRS Agent nervous with his evasiveness. That Agent was looking into tax issues relating to a $1 million deposit – re. the Traditional Holdings, LLC “deal” – to Leonard Norman Cohen. I can understand why Richard Westin made this Agent nervous. He made me nervous – particularly when he wrote that Neal Greenberg was going to screw me over and he would stand up for me. I have no idea what that means but intend to find out. Steve Blanq, Hochman-Rettig, actually wrote me in the Fall of 2004 inquiring if I was being “blamed” for Richard Westin actions. I personally believe these were first and foremost the actions of Leonard Norman Cohen. Fortunately, Westin confirmed – via email – that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a real entity the annuity obligation was real. Unfortunately, Westin – on behalf of Cohen - had already extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return at that time. He extinguished the promissory note and did not report the Sony sale on the 2001 tax returns. He used two separate tax identification numbers which was probably done intentionally to deceive the IRS. Westin also confirmed – via email – that he only represented Leonard Norman Cohen. Truer words have rarely been spoken. These steps were brought to my attention by my advisers – DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess.
NOTE: Kelley needs to address Cohen’s insanity with respect to his desire to sell the publishing, etc. See Declaration in the CAK lawsuit. Also, Kelley wants to know why any portion of that settlement was paid out of Traditional Holdings and is waiting for an IRS Opinion on that issue and others.
DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess confirmed that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and “exposed” me to that fraud. In our last meeting, inexplicably, DiMascio & Berardo wanted to figure in a “settlement” amount for my exposure to Cohen’s fraud. In our first meeting, however, they advised me that once fraud is brought to one’s attention no deals can be made. I was told I had two choices: report it to the IRS and/or amend the tax returns. Reporting tax fraud to the IRS turned out to be incredibly dangerous for me and my family but I did not trust anyone to amend the returns and felt a better course of action would be to report what I was told to the IRS, the State of Kentucky, and others. After all, DiMascio & Berardo calculated the penalties and interest – as of the fall of 2004 – with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC at approximately $10 million. This is what they told me Cohen would have to pay if he personally wanted to report the tax fraud. I believe were Cohen’s allegations that his advisers defrauded him realistic he would have gone to the IRS with me. DiMascio & Berardo seemed to understand that similar penalties and interest were accumulating with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and LC Investments, LLC. Dale Burgess, my former accountant advised me that there is fraud on three entities and both he and Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s former accountant, believe the intellectual property is still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. I own 15% of that intellectual property – wherever it has gone - and have repeatedly requested a complete and proper forensic accounting with all assets on the table. I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff’s Opinion on that issue. Agent Betzer, a Collection Agent with the IRS, also believed I owned 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and 99.5% Traditional Holdings, LLC. He advised me to go get what was rightfully mine and he appeared to be an exceptionally helpful and brilliant man. Agent Betzer understood that I paid approximately $165,000.00 in taxes on a company that Cohen has ultimately attempted to prove I did not own. I believed I owned it and I believed there might be something suspect about that entity and the promissory note – which is why I demanded and received an “Indemnity Agreement” from Cohen. For these reasons, one might imagine, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and Agent Kelly Sopko-Treasury Department are copied in on my emails.
DiMascio & Berardo were apparently impressed with and/or intimidated by the fact that Cohen was represented by former District Attorney Ira Reiner and perhaps this is why they encouraged me to participate in what I believe would have been an illegal deal, illegal meditation, and possibly insurance fraud. Ira Reiner was brought in, according to Kory, to handle the mediation for Cohen because Kory does not understand litigation. I would like to point out that Dale Burgess asked me to confirm for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud and confirmed that he would answer a subpoena and testify to the fact that I was offered 50% community property by Cohen – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers.
The IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Department of Justice are referenced in the subject line of the email you responded to and it seems odd that you would permit yourself to be copied in on so many emails from odzerchenma@gmail.com and twiggy.ahmadinejad@gmail.com and only now ask me to “immediately” remove you. I have asked you to explain why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Please see relevant pages of the Killer King report – which I previously mailed Detective Silva and emailed you and Truc Do. My email accounts and Blogs, I might note, have been targeted by Michelle Blaine Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and others – including someone who posts as “Bird.” That is the “crowd” you are apparently associated with which is unconscionable – given what has gone on and what is going on with those Blogs. Investigator William Frayeh, of your office, felt Gianelli might have found a sympathetic ear – yours. That is truly appalling and I absolutely believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, DEA, Immigration, Phil Spector and his legal team should investigate what is going on here and what has gone on. Stephen Gianelli has, from my perspective, lied to Special Agent Wynar of Oakland FBI. He had the audacity, from what Belark-Gianelli-Blogonaut advised me, to go to the FBI with allegations that I am spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the United States Treasury Department. It would seem that Gianelli now has the FBI investigating the Treasury. Given the fact that Agent Sopko was able to call me, fly into see me in Santa Ana, California, and email me Agent Tejeda’s information , one can safely assume that she personally can determine whether or not I am spamming her and advise me to stop. Gianelli also phoned Bruce Cutler who, as you well know, represented Phil Spector. Gianelli is apparently extremely eager to determine what’s on Bruce Cutler’s mind. One thing that should be on Bruce Cutler’s mind is the fact that Nat McBride, an acquaintance of Nicole Spector’s, received a “death threat” from one Brian Peterson (bpeterson999@yahoo) and received at least one email from someone purporting to be Bruce Cutler. I, naturally, have been accused of sending that email. I can assure you that I would not criminally impersonate Bruce Cutler and have now reported those threats and the criminal impersonation of Mr. Cutler to the Department of Justice and Interpol.
Gianelli, amazingly enough, also phoned Investigator Frayeh to determine, from what I can tell, if William Frayeh thinks Prosecutor/Judge Pat Dixon is “good looking.” Please keep in mind that this is a murder trial that has now taken a surreal turn. Gianelli/Blogonaut is all over this story and his role seems sinister – particularly given the fact that Blogonaut publicly stated and emailed me that “it” had been in contact with Cohen’s advisers on three separate occasions, was communicating with people who knew me in Los Angeles, and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is apparently willing to help me. All I have to do in order to get my life and children back is lie. I have captured much of the activity on Blaine’s Blog, Blogonaut’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s website, my own Blogs, and so forth because I thought some of the slander and malicious allegations might ultimately be pulled down which is precisely what has occurred. I have forwarded the captured Blog content to Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and others. Lying seems to be the name of the game. I was offered 50% of Cohen’s “community property” – presumably to lie to the IRS and others that Cohen was defrauded by his advisers (which is not what I witnessed) – and declined that. The idea of Cohen (“the Mastermind”) being defrauded by his advisers is laughable. His disdain for “ordinary income taxes” may be unprecedented. He had similarly disdainful views of gift taxes and his own lawyer, Reeve Chudd, emailed me that he was not an “alchemist” when Cohen attempted to donate his body of work to the University of Toronto Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library in exchange for a United States tax credit.
I realize this may complicate matters for the District Attorney as it seems that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury but let me state, for the record, what Boies Schiller advised me to do when they realized I was meeting Robert Kory for our luncheon: Call Brian Bennett and have him wire me. They seemed to believe I was being asked to participate in criminal activity and were clear – in their emails – that recording Kory would not be a “set up” because what I was being asked to do was illegal. Betsy Superfon, who was apparently negotiating with Cohen and Kory (without my knowledge, awareness and/or consent) ultimately spoke to Cohen/Kory. Yongzin Rinpoche, who was visiting with his wife, advised me to have her drop by. I asked her to have Cohen/Kory put the terms of their “deal” in writing and fax it to me. Kory advised Superfon that this is not the type of deal that could be faxed and suggested that he, Superfon, and I meet for lunch. Later, Superfon told me the type of deal Cohen wanted me to make was an illegal one and advised me that Lindsey took my son away from me to keep him out of Cohen’s tax fraud and there was something – like money – in it for him. There must have been. Why else would my “ex-husband” meet with Cohen and Kory and accede to their requests to take Ray away from me. I was initially told that Cohen and Kory went into Lindsey’s office and accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone. I remain unconvinced that this is defense to tax fraud and tend to doubt it’s a “crime” in any event. The focus on my “alleged” and fictional sex life – by Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Bergman, Gianelli/Blogonaut, etc. - is perverse and obsessive. My son’s grandfather, Mort Lindsey, even inserted himself into this situation when he contacted Cohen and/or Kory and phoned me in an attempt to have me make what I was told would have been an illegal deal. Cohen thought I was close with Mort Lindsey, a man I viewed as my father-in-law, and thought he could coerce me into a deal. That is precisely what I was told by Lindsey. Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon have been “named” in Greenberg’s lawsuit against Cohen. The FBI in Denver told me they would be brought in if there was witness or evidence tampering and explained that it is criminal. Dan Scheid, Greenberg’s lawyer, advised me3 that he has evidence relating to criminal witness and evidence tampering. He confirmed that this evidence relates to Cohen, Kory, Lindsey and Superfon – who apparently “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. The next question one must ask is “by whom.” Clearly they couldn’t, on their own, have me “falsely arrested.”
I would strongly suggest that you review the police reports of Cohen’s interview with the detectives Steve Cron and I met at his house. He either lied to them or, if Mick Brown was accurate when he advised me that Cohen testified before Phil Spector’s grand jury, perjured himself. That would seem to raise issues having to do with obstruction of justice as well. The detectives I met seemed professional so perhaps they too will be confused about Cohen’s testimony before the grand jury – or, possibly, that you referred to an incident between Cohen and Phil Spector in the Motion In Limine. For the record, Cohen advised me that he confirmed – for the detectives – that his comments, over the years about Phil Spector, were good rock ‘n roll comments which is precisely what he told me over the course of 20 years. He also told me that he did not like his vocals and felt humiliated that Phillip did not want to mix the album – putting him in the position of being forced to telegram Phillip. Phillip told me he received hate mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fans and found working with Cohen depressing. I can assure you that I found working with Cohen unbelievably depressing. He certainly did not mind his daughter, Lorca Cohen, accompanying me to visit Phil Spector one night at the Bel Air Hotel sometime in approximately 1993. In fact, he seemed rather delighted and intrigued. That is precisely how he felt when he heard that I was having dinner with Phillip in Beverly Hills after the Clarkson incident.
I also reported Cohen’s tax fraud and the fact that he has defrauded me of millions to the District Attorney’s Major Fraud Unit. Please speak to Jeff Jonas about this Complaint. He may be the same Jeff Jonas whose name appears in your office’s Internal Memorandum relating to King Drew and questioning the credibility of coroner Luis Pena. Apparently my Complaint to your Major Fraud Unit was problematic for the District Attorney as it resulted in Brian Bennett threatening to report me to someone. To whom I cannot say. I can say this though - I spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I filed the Complaint with your Major Fraud Unit. I also spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I felt Cohen was attempting to blackmail me and the fact that I thought he perjured himself and should be arrested.
Why have I been emailing you and Truc Do and leaving messages for various people at the District Attorney’s Office? I can assure you this is not “harassment.” Your office dragged me into the Phil Spector murder trial – not I. On May 25, 2005, I was held hostage by a S.W.A.T. Team comprised of Los Angeles Police Department and Inglewood Police Department. Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD, who monitored my only visit with Ray Charles Lindsey since May 25, 2005, told me Beverly Hills Police Department may have been present as well. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and ultimately determined that the entire King Drew file was falsified. In fact, the individual in that file is apparently one Kelly Annette Lynch who would have been 19 at the time. Rutger and I did not spontaneously manifest on this planet at the same moment in time – which is basically what would have needed to occur were Kelly Annette Lynch actually his mother. She is, however, the woman that seems to have lost custody of my son Ray Charles Lindsey. The bizarre part of the King Drew report is that my address is correct. My name, however, is spelled incorrectly and on one page alone the following details are false and/or wrong: the social security number, my place of birth, date of birth, religion, and the insurance number. I was born in Pennsylvania and while I consider myself a devout Christian I am also His Holiness Kusum Lingpa’s lineage holder and generally note – in medical documents – that I am “Buddhist.” The primary reason for this has to do with how I want my body handled should I die. Very little, if anything, in that file relates to me. A nurse informed me that there was fraudulent information in the file and someone was planning to transfer me. Fortunately, after requesting a new doctor, Dr. D’Angelo took my file and determined that I was not dangerous to myself and/or others. Most people who are held at gunpoint by approximately 30 armed men aren’t dangerous – particularly when they are alone in their homes wearing a bikini which is what I was wearing.
A custody matter was obviously coordinated with my “visit” to Killer King and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number appears in the attendant falsified police report. For the record, the actual conversation Rutger had with “Erma Oppenhein” after the S.W.A.T. incident was limited to two questions: Is your Mother on any medication and are you ok? His answers: Yes, heart medication and yes, he was ok. Steven Clark Lindsey is my younger son’s father and, after inserting himself into the Leonard Norman Cohen Tax Fraud Matter, filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that matter. My son, Rutger, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my former house to Cohen/Kory – by Lindsey – while I was en route to Killer King. I would like to point out that there is no signature permitting anyone to treat me at King Drew and Steven Clark Lindsey had no legal right, whatsoever, to speak to any doctor or medical provider on my behalf. His lawyer, Daniel A. Bergman, apparently faxed Superfon’s Declaration to her while I was being taken to King Drew. When I have the money I intend to obtain a complete copy of the custody file – including transcripts of hearings – and will turn that over to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and – most definitely - Phil Spector. For now, I am living in a homeless shelter in Houston and Blogonaut/Gianelli have “urged” Boulder Police Department and Los Angeles Police Department to further target me. Law enforcement is all over this story and it is revolting. This is why I contacted the Department of Justice and the FBI.
I have brought the fraudulent use of someone else’s social security number (in the King Drew file and in the so-called “police report”) to the attention of the Social Security Administration, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, the FTC, the Postal Inspector, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others. The Social Security Administration advised me to file a criminal complaint with the Houston Police Department after I discussed, with a representative, the fact that Cohen issued illegal K1s using my Social Security number and with respect to the number that appears in the King Drew file. Apparently it is also identity theft. This might be a good time to note that Leonard Norman Cohen to change my mailing address sometime in 2004/2005 to his address on Tremaine Avenue in Los Angeles, California. I filed a Complaint with the Postal Inspector about this matter which I assume is “mail fraud” and gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others the details.
I advised Agent Sopko and her partner, in our meeting, that I believe the custody matter arose from Cohen’s tax fraud – that I was told is criminal and relates to the Phil Spector murder trial that I definitely view as a set up. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, and others, with Robert Kory and Betsy Superfon’s Declarations that were filed in the custody matter. Ray Charles Lindsey, my son, “witnessed” a conversation between me and Kory about 1) Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; 2) the missing state tax returns; 3) my intellectual property that appears to have been stolen (see Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and evidence I filed in Boulder, Colorado with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order – meant to silence me and prevent me from contacting Kory with respect to 1099s, illegal K1s issued me by LC Investments, LLC, my intellectual property, a complete and proper forensic accounting, etc. – all of which is an “IRS matter”); and, 4) their threats. I would like to point out that I discussed Cohen and Kory’s threats to put me in jail with Agent Sopko and her partner. Agent Sopko asked me how “they” intended to do that. I have no idea and would have demanded a jury trial in any event. At this point, I would like to underscore this fact: I did not enter an appearance in Cohen’s bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached because I believe it is an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and/or criminal conduct – an attempt to obstruct justice. The financial “ledger” attached thereto is fraudulent. Please see Dale Burgess’ fax to DiMascio & Berardo (also filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado) setting forth – after meeting with Kevin Prins/Moss Adam’s (Cohen’s accountant) – the tremendous amount of missing back-up documentation (including asset valuations).
Leonard Norman Cohen has gone to extraordinary lengths to silence me and has noted, for the news media, the massive tax hit he will take in connection with his creative tax planning. In other words, Cohen has publicly stated his motive. Cohen and Kory were going to “destroy” me and my children and I can assure you that when you are talking about destroying children you are not speaking legally. I mailed Norman Posel’s email (from Boies Schiller) regarding one of these threats to the FBI in Denver. Boies Schiller felt Cohen was attempting to silence and terrorize me and wondered why he would make me an enemy. His tax history is the correct answer.
Let me explain how DiMascio & Berardo saw these entities: Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. owns the assets; LC Investments and Leonard Cohen personally collect the income; and Traditional Holdings, LLC sold something it did not own. I was not part of the team of legal and accounting professionals who tended to the tax planning (while I tended to Anjani Thomas’ garden …) and/or corporate structures but I do know this: Cohen’s tax lawyer, Richard Westin, wrote that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” and felt the IRS could overturn the entity if it noticed a disregard for substance and/or form. There seems to be a disregard for everything – including a “business purpose” as Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet pointed out. I was not a trustee – constructive or otherwise – on any of these entities and am awaiting Opinion Letters from the IRS and State of Kentucky on that issue. There is no way I am in a position to respond legally to the allegations raised by Leonard Norman Cohen and/or Neal Greenberg in his “companion suit” filed in the U.S. District Court in Denver until I have the Opinion of the appropriate tax authorities. In the meantime, I have dissolved Traditional Holdings, LLC and filed final tax returns – so that nothing else can be done in my name. Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s accountant, advised me that Cohen’s entities and/or the tax matters at hand remind him of “Enron.”
After receiving your email I phoned Investigator William Frayeh. It seems inconceivably bizarre that Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut would have indication of the content of your email to me. They were not copied in on that email. I tend to doubt “it” reads minds, has a crystal ball, or hacked into your email account. I have previously spoken with Investigator Frayeh regarding the Phil Spector murder trial. As you, no doubt, are aware Detective Brian Bennett came by my former house to interview me after the District Attorney received an anonymous call (from a woman) in connection with Phil Spector and my friendship. Phil Spector and I have known one another for approximately 25-years and I believe it is safe to say that we are dear friends. I worked for Mr. Spector, as an intern, in 1988 and 1989 (and at times thereafter) after Marty Machat’s death and have remained friends with Mr. Spector and Janis Zavala Spector. I phoned Janis Zavala Spector, after being released from Killer King and discussed the fact that I lost custody of Ray at the same time. Janis Zavala Spector understood that somehow the Leonard Cohen tax matter related to Phillip’s matter. Investigator John Thompson told me I was probably a witness in that matter when I met with him and Detective Silva in Santa Ana, California. At that time, we also discussed the fact that I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and the outrageous fact that “Inglewood Police Department” was present at my home on May 25, 2005. A sadistic police officer told my son that they intended to shoot me and my dog. Ultimately, they ended up informing Rutger that my dog was my hostage and they were merely taking precautions. That is ludicrous and absurd. The police were advised – repeatedly - by Rutger and his friends that my younger son Ray had been taken down the street and left with Cloris Leachman and there was no hostage situation.
Based upon what has unfolded it is nearly impossible for me to believe that you feel I am “spamming” you – as Gianelli stated. Apparently you and Gianelli/Blogonaut have this in common and, I suspect, you are or were communicating with Gianelli and Blogonaut. That seems like a very reasonable conclusion. It is shocking, however, given the attempts Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark-Blaine, and others, have gone (on Blogonaut’s Blog, mControl’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s site (and elsewhere) to undermine my credibility through slander, malicious gossip, libel, defamation, bald-faced lies, etc. Of course, it is impossible to undermine someone based on lies that must now be proven – as fact – in a court of law. I have brought these Blogs to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury Department, Agent Wynar-FBI Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, Ron Burkle, Robert MacMillan, Lee Kanon Alpert, Bruce Cutler, Esquire, Kyabje Thinley Norbu, Karmapa, Sharmapa, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche and others. I am convinced that Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark, Blaine - and, of course, you and others - have attempted to obstruct justice and have engaged in witness tampering, witness retaliation, witness intimidation, harassment, stalking, and a coordinated campaign of cyber-terrorism clearly designed to silence and undermine my credibility. Gianelli/Blogonaut “have” also lied to the FBI in Oakland. Furthermore, “they” have publicly confirmed their communications (on at least three separate occasions) with Leonard Norman Cohen’s advisers and/or legal team. I am assuming this is the Law Offices of Robert Kory. They mentioned Kory and his associate Rice in some of their posts and/or emails to me. Blogonaut’s Blog appears to be affiliated with Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog which is a vile, filthy site that was public but is now invitation only or private. I was also slandered on that Blog (as were the Karmapa, Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, and Lama Karma Wangchuk) – that is obviously affiliated with Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations Blog. It has been suggested, to me, that Sprocket’s Blog is the “mouth-piece” for Donna Clarkson.
Needless to say, this is an outrageous, outlandish, and unconscionable situation that has exposed Phil Spector, me, our families, and others to the whims of possibly unstable people and vigilantism. I am absolutely convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the Social Security Administration, and Immigration should look into the role – if any – the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office played in having me dragged to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and falsifying the file. It is my opinion that there was a two-fold reason for taking me to King Drew: 1) to determine what, if anything, I knew about Phil Spector and guns. Officer Maurice Hampton/LAPD and Erma Oppenhein/SMART questioned me about this en route to Killer King; and, 2) to prevent me from successfully reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and serving as a credible witness.
I informed Agent Bill Betzer/IRS on April 15, 2005 that I believed I had been exposed to tax fraud and he advised me to bring the fraud into the IRS with a lawyer. Agent Betzer then advised me to call the IRS Fraud Hotline – which I did. Ultimately, I contacted the IRS via its website – reporting the tax fraud – and called the IRS in Washington, D.C. I asked Miss Hall, who advised me that she could not talk to the public, that I was in a very dangerous situation and she took down my name and certain information. Sometime thereafter I received an email from the IRS and began emailing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff evidence – including the corporate indexes, and other documents, that I filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado. I also gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others the passwords to my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com email accounts. The reason I did this is so the IRS, primarily, could make an independent determination – based on emails between me-Cohen-his advisers, etc. – as to what actually occurred. I thought this might prove helpful in conjunction with the evidence I sent them and the evidence I intended to send them – which was, from my perspective, unlawfully seized by the Sheriff’s Department on behalf of Cohen, Gibson Dumb & Dumber, and others.
Investigator Frayeh advised me to stop emailing you. I have stopped. I am, however, transmitting this letter to you via email. Investigator Frayeh also suggested that I ignore Blogonaut, Gianelli, and Belark. They have since removed the slanderous and vile articles and comments on their Blog but the lie disguised as an article (written by Joff Belark) remains and I would like to determine who released my so-called “booking” photograph to Belark in connection with some of the insanity I dealt with in Boulder, Colorado. I called Investigator Frayeh to inform him that I was being accused of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon. This is preposterous. I sarcastically put a photograph of Dixon and Judge Larry Fidler in one of my extremely public emails and quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke.” Please review the lyrics to Eminem’s live MTV performance of “Puke.” He, not I, refers to “dry humping.” Larry Fidler’s own remarks, about what he may or may not wear under his robes, have even come back to haunt me – as inconceivable as that may be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AmCIryu6Q
Blogonaut publicly announced that Pat Dixon actually fears for his life because I informed government, law enforcement, and the news media – via my public emails documenting the destruction of my life – that every time I think of “Dixon” I want to “Puke.” Most parents would. I personally believe it is going to be impossible to prove I have a pattern of sexual fantasies involving Pat Dixon and others lawyers or judges. In any event, sexual fantasies – real or imagined – do not appear to constitute a predicate act under R.I.C.O.
Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark targeted my son Rutger as well and sent him vicious and malicious emails (such as “Ding Dong the Witch Is Dead”) and – for reasons I cannot imagine – forwarded Douglas Penick’s dictated response to Boulder Police Department. Boulder Police Department is all over this story. After attempting to leave “Officer Maurice Hampton” a message with “Officer Garrin – LAPD” – some time ago – Officer Storbeck of Boulder Police Department rolled into Deneuve Construction (with the Police Chief’s secretary) to determine if I was dangerous to myself or others. He was armed and clearly far more dangerous than I. The Denver FBI instructed me to contact the Boulder District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General of Colorado. To date, I have heard nothing from either with respect to their investigations into this deadly serious matter. I did hear from the Attorney General of Colorado’s Office. They advised me to go into Court and request that a Special Prosecutor be appointed after I wrote them that I was the victim of cyber-terrorism, cyber-stalking, etc.
Rutger has witnessed a tremendous amount of insanity during this ordeal and was actually asked by Steven Clark Lindsey (immediately following the S.W.A.T. incident) to go into Cohen/Kory’s office and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Cohen and/or Kory. He also had his fingers ripped off in a meat grinder incident at Whole Foods. OSHA felt there might be criminal negligence on the part of Whole Foods and thought the District Attorney could look into that. Perhaps the phone messages I left regarding that “incident” were misconstrued as “harassment” by Pat Dixon. I was told by Gianelli and/or Blogonaut that Pat Dixon discussed my phone messages – to the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office – with Bruce Cutler. I intend to speak to Bruce Cutler personally about any and all conversations he had with your office about me.
The targeting of children is inconceivably brutal and I personally believe Steve Cooley and you are involved. No one on earth can convince me otherwise. I also believe the slander, etc. on Blogonaut’s Blog was timed to coincide with the Phil Spector appeal and the Clarkson civil suit. In any event, I view Rutger as a witness and am convinced that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark (and others) have engaged in witness retaliation, witness intimidation, and worse, with respect to my son. Since Lindsey emailed me that Cohen/Kory were encouraging him to take Ray away from me (after the conversation he witnessed) it is clear that he too is the victim of witness retaliation and intimidation. The entire custody matter appears to be nothing other than an attempt to coerce me into a deal with Cohen and an attempt to obstruct justice.
Blogonaut publicly noted that he/Gianelli made an “educated guess” about the content of your email to me. I find that absurd. Blogonaut noted that you contacted its Blog with respect to my extremely public emails. Investigator William Frayeh, who will receive a copy of this letter, said he would look into this situation. I will, of course, copy in the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury Department, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan. Irrational hardly begins to describe the following comment posted on Blogonaut’s Blog with respect to your email to me. It begins shamelessly with “Uh.” That sets the tone. Blogonaut then publicly declares that the Department of Justice is on my “spam list” although I don’t believe I have spammed anyone – least of all the Department of Justice. I don’t know if I received a “substantive communication” from you but the reason I was focused on Blogonaut’s Blog is due to the fact that I thought you, the District Attorney of Los Angeles, and possibly the Clarkson family or their lawyers, might somehow be associated with and/or communicating with this Blog. Leonard Cohen’s advisers were and Blogonaut has publicly noted that. Nothing about you, as Phil Spector’s “prosecutor,” can be viewed as “simply nothing more than” anything. You are communicating with a Blog that is dead set on maligning me – based entirely on lies. Why did Blogonaut have to point out that it would “endeavor” when it hit “reply all” to remove you from my extremely public emails that are being sent to government agencies, law enforcement agencies, and the newsmedia. Endeavor means “to attempt” or “to make an effort.” That makes absolutely no sense – whatsoever – in this context and Blogonaut/Gianelli, I might point out, is a lawyer and a liar. This is blatant legal maneuvering at its most shameless. There was no “educated guess” about your email to me. You wrote Blogonaut and I confirmed what you said in your email to me. This did not send me into a tizzy. It confirmed my worst suspicions. It did generate emails to “high places” – to quote Blogonaut/Gianelli in all his arrogant glory: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. It also prompted a phone call, by me, to Agent Wynar/Special Agent FBI who has apparently been asked – by Blogonaut/Gianelli – to investigate whether or not I am “spamming” the Treasury. In conclusion, I would like to point out something that I feel strongly about – that is not only frivolous, probably criminal, it is a waste of resources that the FBI could better spend on things like protecting our citizens from terrorism. I do not like phoning Agent Wynar, or the FBI in Denver, actually. It seems preposterous to me but I have been forced into this position and do not have a choice. Beyond that, there is official misconduct and law enforcement conduct that crosses state borders at hand. You might understand the seriousness of this situation better than I.
Blogonaut said…
Uh, the reason that we knew that Alan Jackson’s email to KL, that KL was touting to the DOJ (and her usual spam list) as a substantive communication from the Spector prosecutor was simply nothing more that a request to drop him from the cc list–was that we received the same request from Mr. Jackson yesterday, we pointed out that the only one that could do this was Lynch—but we said that we would endeavor when we hit “reply-all” to one of Lynch’s emails to make sure he was not copied with our reply.
No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).
http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/07/phillip-spector-appeal-update-record-on.html
Ed Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, informed me that if the IRS Commissioner believes this is fraud and not negligence he will come in after the lawyers and accountants as well. One can only hope and pray that Kory is at the top of the list of lawyers – together with Scott Edelman/Gibson, Dumb and Dumber who had no qualms “seizing” evidence they understood I intended to send to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Of course, I wasn’t served that lawsuit and have noticed that rotten lawyers who lie for a living think they are above the law and tend to ignore due process. In light of what has happened it was shocking to read that you view my emails as “spam.” It made me realize that you are a vicious and sadistic individual who is capable of anything. I realize my emails may be unwanted but they are definitely not “spam.”
For the record, Phil Spector and I had dinner and drinks after the Lana Clarkson incident and I asked him – point blank – if he shot Clarkson. He told me that he did not. Rather, Clarkson was apparently dancing around in his foyer singing “Da Doo Run Run” prior to shooting herself. This “theory” is supported by forensic science and the expert opinions of Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, and Dr. James Pex. To assume that these men would conspire to lie and destroy their careers is blatantly ridiculous. Furthermore, I know Mr. Spector, believe he is absolutely innocent, and will continue to stand by him come hell or high water. That is what friends do. They do not betray people, sell stories to the news media, and fabricate or revise the past for their own suspect reasons and/or motives.
I await your response to this question: why are my emails documenting the destruction of my life spam and did Pat Dixon personally authorize Blogonaut/Gianelli to publicly state that he feared for his life when I quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke?”
Sincerely,
/s/ Kelley Lynch
Enclosures
Posted On: Friday, Oct. 9 2009 @ 11:15AM
November 29th, 2009 at 1:01 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Maybe Alan Jackson Found This Harassing
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 4:59 AM
To the Department of Justice,
How can Gianelli-Blogonaut state publicly that you are on my “spam” list? Is that how the DOJ perceives my emails and why is my family now exposed to terrorist threats relating to evidence in a potentially pending federal criminal prosecution of Cohen. Gianelli-Blogonaut was clear, on Phawker, that he understands IRS policy.
Kelley
Kelley Lynch says:
Redlined Copy – 10-06-09
Kelley Lynch
odzerchenma3@gmail.com
September 21, 2009
Alan Jackson
District Attorney’s Office
County of Los Angeles
210 Temple Street
Suite 18000
Los Angeles, California 90012-3210
Re: Kelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles, et al.
Alan Jackson:
I am in receipt of your email dated September 9, 2009 demanding that I remove you from my email “recipients list.” My emails, as I have repeatedly stated, document the destruction of my life, the destruction of my children and parent’s lives, the targeting of my family, etc., due solely to the fact that I was told Leonard Norman Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and reported that to the IRS and others.
I can assure you that all matters involving Cohen and myself are IRS matters and there is no need for me to “convert” anything into a tax matter. I would not be in an adversarial position with Cohen had I not reported his tax fraud and, instead, accepted 50% community property, illegally mediated and/or participated in what I believed was criminal conduct. I am absolutely convinced that Ray Charles alleged custody matter arose from and relates to Cohen’s tax fraud and the Phil Spector murder trial. I refused to cave into extremely vicious coercive tactics – such as those used against me in Ray Charles Lindsey’s unconscionably vicious custody matter that I view as a kidnapping. Robert Kory, Cohen’s lawyer, has a Declaration filed in that matter but he does not know my son. He did, however, note that he and Cohen did not want to be “identified” as the individuals encouraging Steven Clark Lindsey to take Ray away from me. I am absolutely convinced that I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to prevent me from testifying against Cohen in any IRS or other matter - whether it is currently “pending” or not. How would anyone, other than the IRS, know what is or is not a pending matter? I am not convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and/or the Treasury Department are engaged in a major prank and feel it would be prudent to assume that there may very well be serious issues at hand. Sergeant Joe _____________/LAPD monitored my only visit with my son Ray in approximately July 2005. He raised issues relating to domestic violence (Steve Clark Lindsey’s issues) and advised me to go into Daniel A. Bergman’s law office and make a deal that would make me happy. Sergeant Joe _____________/LAPD is the officer that told me, at that time, that LAPD hid evidence (a car and possibly a gun wrapped in a blanket) in the Biggie Smalls “wrongful death” matter. I brought that allegation to the attention of your office and others – including Bradley Gage and the Department of Justice. Sergeant Joe __________/LAPD told me he liked me and both of my boys and did not want to charge me for the fraudulent monitored visit clearly meant to intimidate both me and my sons. It was and remains an unconscionable situation that demands an investigation – that would include his allegations regarding Christopher Wallace’s death. I believe Detective Russell Poole brought his concerns regarding the “murder” of Biggie Smalls to your office’s attention. I reported what Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD told me because it seemed both deadly serious and dangerous.
In any event, I intend to litigate this situation and my lawsuits will address the fact that my life has been destroyed because I had the audacity to report Cohen’s tax fraud and am a friend of Phil Spector’s. Cohen seems to think Phil Spector and I will take the fall for him. He is sadly mistaken. At the very heart of this matter – from my perspective - is the District Attorney’s need to keep Leonard Norman Cohen credible. Cohen, from my perspective, is a calculated fraud, pathological liar, pervert, and utterly overwhelming control freak.
Not only do I believe Cohen committed tax fraud with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, possibly Old Ideas, LLC, in connection with other entities, and personally, I believe he may have a lifelong history of tax fraud in the United States and Canada. In fact, I emailed the IRS Commissioner’s Staff a 1977 tax memo prepared specifically for “Cohen” advising him that he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had residences but cautioning him not to have a green card. Cohen had a green card and informed me that he abandoned it sometime after Marty Machat’s death because the IRS does not ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada does. This might explain why he applied for and obtained a new green card in 1991. It might also explain the social security number insanity his accountant, Burt Goldstein, sorted out after Marty Machat’s death in 1988. Marty Machat was Phil Spector and Cohen’s attorney and I worked for him from approximately 1984 until his death in April 1988. There is no doubtin my mind that Cohen planned to blame Martin Machat, after his death, for any issues relating to U.S. tax issues, Immigration, and/or Social Security matters. The lengths Cohen went to obtain a new green card were extraordinary. – including his attempt to obtain one through L.C. Stranger Music, Inc.
Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, appears to follow him from adviser to adviser. He also has a pattern of blaming advisers and stealing from them. I provided Boies Schiller with Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting a $30,000.00 final payment for his and Bob Johnston’s share of Stranger Music, Inc. Unfortunately, when Cohen sold Leonard Cohen Stranger Music, Inc. and Bad Monk Publishing Company to Sony he did not inform me that he was selling Mr. Machat and Mr. Johnston’s shares. I believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should review that sale and, specifically, look into why Cohen and Westin were concerned about issues relating to the assignments of copyrights into Bad Monk Publishing. I also believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should look into the failed C.A.K. bond deal and the formation of Cohen’s two charitable remainder trusts. Ed Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, was concerned about personal service contracts and other legal issues relating to the charitable remainder trusts. Robert Kory advised me, at our luncheon, that I had a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers, that there was fraud on every entity, and confirmed my suspicions: the holding periods were illegal. Kory also emailed me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to questions, relating to Cohen’s taxes, going back many years. I was told by Steve Blanq of Hochman, Rettig that Richard Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, made an Ogden, Utah IRS Agent nervous with his evasiveness. That Agent was looking into tax issues relating to a $1 million deposit – re. the Traditional Holdings, LLC “deal” – to Leonard Norman Cohen. I can understand why Richard Westin made this Agent nervous. He made me nervous – particularly when he wrote that Neal Greenberg was going to screw me over and he would stand up for me. I have no idea what that means but intend to find out. Steve Blanq, Hochman-Rettig, actually wrote me in the Fall of 2004 inquiring if I was being “blamed” for Richard Westin actions. I personally believe these were first and foremost the actions of Leonard Norman Cohen. Fortunately, Westin confirmed – via email – that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a real entity the annuity obligation was real. Unfortunately, Westin – on behalf of Cohen - had already extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return at that time. He extinguished the promissory note and did not report the Sony sale on the 2001 tax returns. He used two separate tax identification numbers which was probably done intentionally to deceive the IRS. Westin also confirmed – via email – that he only represented Leonard Norman Cohen. Truer words have rarely been spoken. These steps were brought to my attention by my advisers – DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess.
NOTE: Kelley needs to address Cohen’s insanity with respect to his desire to sell the publishing, etc. See Declaration in the CAK lawsuit. Also, Kelley wants to know why any portion of that settlement was paid out of Traditional Holdings and is waiting for an IRS Opinion on that issue and others.
DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess confirmed that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and “exposed” me to that fraud. In our last meeting, inexplicably, DiMascio & Berardo wanted to figure in a “settlement” amount for my exposure to Cohen’s fraud. In our first meeting, however, they advised me that once fraud is brought to one’s attention no deals can be made. I was told I had two choices: report it to the IRS and/or amend the tax returns. Reporting tax fraud to the IRS turned out to be incredibly dangerous for me and my family but I did not trust anyone to amend the returns and felt a better course of action would be to report what I was told to the IRS, the State of Kentucky, and others. After all, DiMascio & Berardo calculated the penalties and interest – as of the fall of 2004 – with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC at approximately $10 million. This is what they told me Cohen would have to pay if he personally wanted to report the tax fraud. I believe were Cohen’s allegations that his advisers defrauded him realistic he would have gone to the IRS with me. DiMascio & Berardo seemed to understand that similar penalties and interest were accumulating with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and LC Investments, LLC. Dale Burgess, my former accountant advised me that there is fraud on three entities and both he and Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s former accountant, believe the intellectual property is still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. I own 15% of that intellectual property – wherever it has gone - and have repeatedly requested a complete and proper forensic accounting with all assets on the table. I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff’s Opinion on that issue. Agent Betzer, a Collection Agent with the IRS, also believed I owned 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and 99.5% Traditional Holdings, LLC. He advised me to go get what was rightfully mine and he appeared to be an exceptionally helpful and brilliant man. Agent Betzer understood that I paid approximately $165,000.00 in taxes on a company that Cohen has ultimately attempted to prove I did not own. I believed I owned it and I believed there might be something suspect about that entity and the promissory note – which is why I demanded and received an “Indemnity Agreement” from Cohen. For these reasons, one might imagine, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and Agent Kelly Sopko-Treasury Department are copied in on my emails.
DiMascio & Berardo were apparently impressed with and/or intimidated by the fact that Cohen was represented by former District Attorney Ira Reiner and perhaps this is why they encouraged me to participate in what I believe would have been an illegal deal, illegal meditation, and possibly insurance fraud. Ira Reiner was brought in, according to Kory, to handle the mediation for Cohen because Kory does not understand litigation. I would like to point out that Dale Burgess asked me to confirm for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud and confirmed that he would answer a subpoena and testify to the fact that I was offered 50% community property by Cohen – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers.
The IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Department of Justice are referenced in the subject line of the email you responded to and it seems odd that you would permit yourself to be copied in on so many emails from odzerchenma@gmail.com and twiggy.ahmadinejad@gmail.com and only now ask me to “immediately” remove you. I have asked you to explain why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Please see relevant pages of the Killer King report – which I previously mailed Detective Silva and emailed you and Truc Do. My email accounts and Blogs, I might note, have been targeted by Michelle Blaine Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and others – including someone who posts as “Bird.” That is the “crowd” you are apparently associated with which is unconscionable – given what has gone on and what is going on with those Blogs. Investigator William Frayeh, of your office, felt Gianelli might have found a sympathetic ear – yours. That is truly appalling and I absolutely believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, DEA, Immigration, Phil Spector and his legal team should investigate what is going on here and what has gone on. Stephen Gianelli has, from my perspective, lied to Special Agent Wynar of Oakland FBI. He had the audacity, from what Belark-Gianelli-Blogonaut advised me, to go to the FBI with allegations that I am spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the United States Treasury Department. It would seem that Gianelli now has the FBI investigating the Treasury. Given the fact that Agent Sopko was able to call me, fly into see me in Santa Ana, California, and email me Agent Tejeda’s information , one can safely assume that she personally can determine whether or not I am spamming her and advise me to stop. Gianelli also phoned Bruce Cutler who, as you well know, represented Phil Spector. Gianelli is apparently extremely eager to determine what’s on Bruce Cutler’s mind. One thing that should be on Bruce Cutler’s mind is the fact that Nat McBride, an acquaintance of Nicole Spector’s, received a “death threat” from one Brian Peterson (bpeterson999@yahoo) and received at least one email from someone purporting to be Bruce Cutler. I, naturally, have been accused of sending that email. I can assure you that I would not criminally impersonate Bruce Cutler and have now reported those threats and the criminal impersonation of Mr. Cutler to the Department of Justice and Interpol.
Gianelli, amazingly enough, also phoned Investigator Frayeh to determine, from what I can tell, if William Frayeh thinks Prosecutor/Judge Pat Dixon is “good looking.” Please keep in mind that this is a murder trial that has now taken a surreal turn. Gianelli/Blogonaut is all over this story and his role seems sinister – particularly given the fact that Blogonaut publicly stated and emailed me that “it” had been in contact with Cohen’s advisers on three separate occasions, was communicating with people who knew me in Los Angeles, and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is apparently willing to help me. All I have to do in order to get my life and children back is lie. I have captured much of the activity on Blaine’s Blog, Blogonaut’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s website, my own Blogs, and so forth because I thought some of the slander and malicious allegations might ultimately be pulled down which is precisely what has occurred. I have forwarded the captured Blog content to Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and others. Lying seems to be the name of the game. I was offered 50% of Cohen’s “community property” – presumably to lie to the IRS and others that Cohen was defrauded by his advisers (which is not what I witnessed) – and declined that. The idea of Cohen (“the Mastermind”) being defrauded by his advisers is laughable. His disdain for “ordinary income taxes” may be unprecedented. He had similarly disdainful views of gift taxes and his own lawyer, Reeve Chudd, emailed me that he was not an “alchemist” when Cohen attempted to donate his body of work to the University of Toronto Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library in exchange for a United States tax credit.
I realize this may complicate matters for the District Attorney as it seems that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury but let me state, for the record, what Boies Schiller advised me to do when they realized I was meeting Robert Kory for our luncheon: Call Brian Bennett and have him wire me. They seemed to believe I was being asked to participate in criminal activity and were clear – in their emails – that recording Kory would not be a “set up” because what I was being asked to do was illegal. Betsy Superfon, who was apparently negotiating with Cohen and Kory (without my knowledge, awareness and/or consent) ultimately spoke to Cohen/Kory. Yongzin Rinpoche, who was visiting with his wife, advised me to have her drop by. I asked her to have Cohen/Kory put the terms of their “deal” in writing and fax it to me. Kory advised Superfon that this is not the type of deal that could be faxed and suggested that he, Superfon, and I meet for lunch. Later, Superfon told me the type of deal Cohen wanted me to make was an illegal one and advised me that Lindsey took my son away from me to keep him out of Cohen’s tax fraud and there was something – like money – in it for him. There must have been. Why else would my “ex-husband” meet with Cohen and Kory and accede to their requests to take Ray away from me. I was initially told that Cohen and Kory went into Lindsey’s office and accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone. I remain unconvinced that this is defense to tax fraud and tend to doubt it’s a “crime” in any event. The focus on my “alleged” and fictional sex life – by Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Bergman, Gianelli/Blogonaut, etc. - is perverse and obsessive. My son’s grandfather, Mort Lindsey, even inserted himself into this situation when he contacted Cohen and/or Kory and phoned me in an attempt to have me make what I was told would have been an illegal deal. Cohen thought I was close with Mort Lindsey, a man I viewed as my father-in-law, and thought he could coerce me into a deal. That is precisely what I was told by Lindsey. Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon have been “named” in Greenberg’s lawsuit against Cohen. The FBI in Denver told me they would be brought in if there was witness or evidence tampering and explained that it is criminal. Dan Scheid, Greenberg’s lawyer, advised me3 that he has evidence relating to criminal witness and evidence tampering. He confirmed that this evidence relates to Cohen, Kory, Lindsey and Superfon – who apparently “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. The next question one must ask is “by whom.” Clearly they couldn’t, on their own, have me “falsely arrested.”
I would strongly suggest that you review the police reports of Cohen’s interview with the detectives Steve Cron and I met at his house. He either lied to them or, if Mick Brown was accurate when he advised me that Cohen testified before Phil Spector’s grand jury, perjured himself. That would seem to raise issues having to do with obstruction of justice as well. The detectives I met seemed professional so perhaps they too will be confused about Cohen’s testimony before the grand jury – or, possibly, that you referred to an incident between Cohen and Phil Spector in the Motion In Limine. For the record, Cohen advised me that he confirmed – for the detectives – that his comments, over the years about Phil Spector, were good rock ‘n roll comments which is precisely what he told me over the course of 20 years. He also told me that he did not like his vocals and felt humiliated that Phillip did not want to mix the album – putting him in the position of being forced to telegram Phillip. Phillip told me he received hate mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fans and found working with Cohen depressing. I can assure you that I found working with Cohen unbelievably depressing. He certainly did not mind his daughter, Lorca Cohen, accompanying me to visit Phil Spector one night at the Bel Air Hotel sometime in approximately 1993. In fact, he seemed rather delighted and intrigued. That is precisely how he felt when he heard that I was having dinner with Phillip in Beverly Hills after the Clarkson incident.
I also reported Cohen’s tax fraud and the fact that he has defrauded me of millions to the District Attorney’s Major Fraud Unit. Please speak to Jeff Jonas about this Complaint. He may be the same Jeff Jonas whose name appears in your office’s Internal Memorandum relating to King Drew and questioning the credibility of coroner Luis Pena. Apparently my Complaint to your Major Fraud Unit was problematic for the District Attorney as it resulted in Brian Bennett threatening to report me to someone. To whom I cannot say. I can say this though - I spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I filed the Complaint with your Major Fraud Unit. I also spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I felt Cohen was attempting to blackmail me and the fact that I thought he perjured himself and should be arrested.
Why have I been emailing you and Truc Do and leaving messages for various people at the District Attorney’s Office? I can assure you this is not “harassment.” Your office dragged me into the Phil Spector murder trial – not I. On May 25, 2005, I was held hostage by a S.W.A.T. Team comprised of Los Angeles Police Department and Inglewood Police Department. Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD, who monitored my only visit with Ray Charles Lindsey since May 25, 2005, told me Beverly Hills Police Department may have been present as well. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and ultimately determined that the entire King Drew file was falsified. In fact, the individual in that file is apparently one Kelly Annette Lynch who would have been 19 at the time. Rutger and I did not spontaneously manifest on this planet at the same moment in time – which is basically what would have needed to occur were Kelly Annette Lynch actually his mother. She is, however, the woman that seems to have lost custody of my son Ray Charles Lindsey. The bizarre part of the King Drew report is that my address is correct. My name, however, is spelled incorrectly and on one page alone the following details are false and/or wrong: the social security number, my place of birth, date of birth, religion, and the insurance number. I was born in Pennsylvania and while I consider myself a devout Christian I am also His Holiness Kusum Lingpa’s lineage holder and generally note – in medical documents – that I am “Buddhist.” The primary reason for this has to do with how I want my body handled should I die. Very little, if anything, in that file relates to me. A nurse informed me that there was fraudulent information in the file and someone was planning to transfer me. Fortunately, after requesting a new doctor, Dr. D’Angelo took my file and determined that I was not dangerous to myself and/or others. Most people who are held at gunpoint by approximately 30 armed men aren’t dangerous – particularly when they are alone in their homes wearing a bikini which is what I was wearing.
A custody matter was obviously coordinated with my “visit” to Killer King and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number appears in the attendant falsified police report. For the record, the actual conversation Rutger had with “Erma Oppenhein” after the S.W.A.T. incident was limited to two questions: Is your Mother on any medication and are you ok? His answers: Yes, heart medication and yes, he was ok. Steven Clark Lindsey is my younger son’s father and, after inserting himself into the Leonard Norman Cohen Tax Fraud Matter, filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that matter. My son, Rutger, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my former house to Cohen/Kory – by Lindsey – while I was en route to Killer King. I would like to point out that there is no signature permitting anyone to treat me at King Drew and Steven Clark Lindsey had no legal right, whatsoever, to speak to any doctor or medical provider on my behalf. His lawyer, Daniel A. Bergman, apparently faxed Superfon’s Declaration to her while I was being taken to King Drew. When I have the money I intend to obtain a complete copy of the custody file – including transcripts of hearings – and will turn that over to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and – most definitely - Phil Spector. For now, I am living in a homeless shelter in Houston and Blogonaut/Gianelli have “urged” Boulder Police Department and Los Angeles Police Department to further target me. Law enforcement is all over this story and it is revolting. This is why I contacted the Department of Justice and the FBI.
I have brought the fraudulent use of someone else’s social security number (in the King Drew file and in the so-called “police report”) to the attention of the Social Security Administration, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, the FTC, the Postal Inspector, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others. The Social Security Administration advised me to file a criminal complaint with the Houston Police Department after I discussed, with a representative, the fact that Cohen issued illegal K1s using my Social Security number and with respect to the number that appears in the King Drew file. Apparently it is also identity theft. This might be a good time to note that Leonard Norman Cohen to change my mailing address sometime in 2004/2005 to his address on Tremaine Avenue in Los Angeles, California. I filed a Complaint with the Postal Inspector about this matter which I assume is “mail fraud” and gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others the details.
I advised Agent Sopko and her partner, in our meeting, that I believe the custody matter arose from Cohen’s tax fraud – that I was told is criminal and relates to the Phil Spector murder trial that I definitely view as a set up. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, and others, with Robert Kory and Betsy Superfon’s Declarations that were filed in the custody matter. Ray Charles Lindsey, my son, “witnessed” a conversation between me and Kory about 1) Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; 2) the missing state tax returns; 3) my intellectual property that appears to have been stolen (see Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and evidence I filed in Boulder, Colorado with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order – meant to silence me and prevent me from contacting Kory with respect to 1099s, illegal K1s issued me by LC Investments, LLC, my intellectual property, a complete and proper forensic accounting, etc. – all of which is an “IRS matter”); and, 4) their threats. I would like to point out that I discussed Cohen and Kory’s threats to put me in jail with Agent Sopko and her partner. Agent Sopko asked me how “they” intended to do that. I have no idea and would have demanded a jury trial in any event. At this point, I would like to underscore this fact: I did not enter an appearance in Cohen’s bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached because I believe it is an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and/or criminal conduct – an attempt to obstruct justice. The financial “ledger” attached thereto is fraudulent. Please see Dale Burgess’ fax to DiMascio & Berardo (also filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado) setting forth – after meeting with Kevin Prins/Moss Adam’s (Cohen’s accountant) – the tremendous amount of missing back-up documentation (including asset valuations).
Leonard Norman Cohen has gone to extraordinary lengths to silence me and has noted, for the news media, the massive tax hit he will take in connection with his creative tax planning. In other words, Cohen has publicly stated his motive. Cohen and Kory were going to “destroy” me and my children and I can assure you that when you are talking about destroying children you are not speaking legally. I mailed Norman Posel’s email (from Boies Schiller) regarding one of these threats to the FBI in Denver. Boies Schiller felt Cohen was attempting to silence and terrorize me and wondered why he would make me an enemy. His tax history is the correct answer.
Let me explain how DiMascio & Berardo saw these entities: Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. owns the assets; LC Investments and Leonard Cohen personally collect the income; and Traditional Holdings, LLC sold something it did not own. I was not part of the team of legal and accounting professionals who tended to the tax planning (while I tended to Anjani Thomas’ garden …) and/or corporate structures but I do know this: Cohen’s tax lawyer, Richard Westin, wrote that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” and felt the IRS could overturn the entity if it noticed a disregard for substance and/or form. There seems to be a disregard for everything – including a “business purpose” as Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet pointed out. I was not a trustee – constructive or otherwise – on any of these entities and am awaiting Opinion Letters from the IRS and State of Kentucky on that issue. There is no way I am in a position to respond legally to the allegations raised by Leonard Norman Cohen and/or Neal Greenberg in his “companion suit” filed in the U.S. District Court in Denver until I have the Opinion of the appropriate tax authorities. In the meantime, I have dissolved Traditional Holdings, LLC and filed final tax returns – so that nothing else can be done in my name. Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s accountant, advised me that Cohen’s entities and/or the tax matters at hand
remind him of “Enron.”
After receiving your email I phoned Investigator William Frayeh. It seems inconceivably bizarre that Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut would have indication of the content of your email to me. They were not copied in on that email. I tend to doubt “it” reads minds, has a crystal ball, or hacked into your email account. I have previously spoken with Investigator Frayeh regarding the Phil Spector murder trial. As you, no doubt, are aware Detective Brian Bennett came by my former house to interview me after the District Attorney received an anonymous call (from a woman) in connection with Phil Spector and my friendship. Phil Spector and I have known one another for approximately 25-years and I believe it is safe to say that we are dear friends. I worked for Mr. Spector, as an intern, in 1988 and 1989 (and at times thereafter) after Marty Machat’s death and have remained friends with Mr. Spector and Janis Zavala Spector. I phoned Janis Zavala Spector, after being released from Killer King and discussed the fact that I lost custody of Ray at the same time. Janis Zavala Spector understood that somehow the Leonard Cohen tax matter related to Phillip’s matter. Investigator John Thompson told me I was probably a witness in that matter when I met with him and Detective Silva in Santa Ana, California. At that time, we also discussed the fact that I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and the outrageous fact that “Inglewood Police Department” was present at my home on May 25, 2005. A sadistic police officer told my son that they intended to shoot me and my dog. Ultimately, they ended up informing Rutger that my dog was my hostage and they were merely taking precautions. That is ludicrous and absurd. The police were advised – repeatedly - by Rutger and his friends that my younger son Ray had been taken down the street and left with Cloris Leachman and there was no hostage situation.
Based upon what has unfolded it is nearly impossible for me to believe that you feel I am “spamming” you – as Gianelli stated. Apparently you and Gianelli/Blogonaut have this in common and, I suspect, you are or were communicating with Gianelli and Blogonaut. That seems like a very reasonable conclusion. It is shocking, however, given the attempts Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark-Blaine, and others, have gone (on Blogonaut’s Blog, mControl’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s site (and elsewhere) to undermine my credibility through slander, malicious gossip, libel, defamation, bald-faced lies, etc. Of course, it is impossible to undermine someone based on lies that must now be proven – as fact – in a court of law. I have brought these Blogs to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury Department, Agent Wynar-FBI Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, Ron Burkle, Robert MacMillan, Lee Kanon Alpert, Bruce Cutler, Esquire, Kyabje Thinley Norbu, Karmapa, Sharmapa, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche and others. I am convinced that Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark, Blaine - and, of course, you and others - have attempted to obstruct justice and have engaged in witness tampering, witness retaliation, witness intimidation, harassment, stalking, and a coordinated campaign of cyber-terrorism clearly designed to silence and undermine my credibility. Gianelli/Blogonaut “have” also lied to the FBI in Oakland. Furthermore, “they” have publicly confirmed their communications (on at least three separate occasions) with Leonard Norman Cohen’s advisers and/or legal team. I am assuming this is the Law Offices of Robert Kory. They mentioned Kory and his associate Rice in some of their posts and/or emails to me. Blogonaut’s Blog appears to be affiliated with Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog which is a vile, filthy site that was public but is now invitation only or private. I was also slandered on that Blog (as were the Karmapa, Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, and Lama Karma Wangchuk) – that is obviously affiliated with Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations Blog. It has been suggested, to me, that Sprocket’s Blog is the “mouth-piece” for Donna Clarkson.
Needless to say, this is an outrageous, outlandish, and unconscionable situation that has exposed Phil Spector, me, our families, and others to the whims of possibly unstable people and vigilantism. I am absolutely convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the Social Security Administration, and Immigration should look into the role – if any – the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office played in having me dragged to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and falsifying the file. It is my opinion that there was a two-fold reason for taking me to King Drew: 1) to determine what, if anything, I knew about Phil Spector and guns. Officer Maurice Hampton/LAPD and Erma Oppenhein/SMART questioned me about this en route to Killer King; and, 2) to prevent me from successfully reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and serving as a credible witness.
I informed Agent Bill Betzer/IRS on April 15, 2005 that I believed I had been exposed to tax fraud and he advised me to bring the fraud into the IRS with a lawyer. Agent Betzer then advised me to call the IRS Fraud Hotline – which I did. Ultimately, I contacted the IRS via its website – reporting the tax fraud – and called the IRS in Washington, D.C. I asked Miss Hall, who advised me that she could not talk to the public, that I was in a very dangerous situation and she took down my name and certain information. Sometime thereafter I received an email from the IRS and began emailing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff evidence – including the corporate indexes, and other documents, that I filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado. I also gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others the passwords to my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com email accounts. The reason I did this is so the IRS, primarily, could make an independent determination – based on emails between me-Cohen-his advisers, etc. – as to what actually occurred. I thought this might prove helpful in conjunction with the evidence I sent them and the evidence I intended to send them – which was, from my perspective, unlawfully seized by the Sheriff’s Department on behalf of Cohen, Gibson Dumb & Dumber, and others.
Investigator Frayeh advised me to stop emailing you. I have stopped. I am, however, transmitting this letter to you via email. Investigator Frayeh also suggested that I ignore Blogonaut, Gianelli, and Belark. They have since removed the slanderous and vile articles and comments on their Blog but the lie disguised as an article (written by Joff Belark) remains and I would like to determine who released my so-called “booking” photograph to Belark in connection with some of the insanity I dealt with in Boulder, Colorado. I called Investigator Frayeh to inform him that I was being accused of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon. This is preposterous. I sarcastically put a photograph of Dixon and Judge Larry Fidler in one of my extremely public emails and quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke.” Please review the lyrics to Eminem’s live MTV performance of “Puke.” He, not I, refers to “dry humping.” Larry Fidler’s own remarks, about what he may or may not wear under his robes, have even come back to haunt me – as inconceivable as that may be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AmCIryu6Q
Blogonaut publicly announced that Pat Dixon actually fears for his life because I informed government, law enforcement, and the news media – via my public emails documenting the destruction of my life – that every time I think of “Dixon” I want to “Puke.” Most parents would. I personally believe it is going to be impossible to prove I have a pattern of sexual fantasies involving Pat Dixon and others lawyers or judges. In any event, sexual fantasies – real or imagined – do not appear to constitute a predicate act under R.I.C.O.
Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark targeted my son Rutger as well and sent him vicious and malicious emails (such as “Ding Dong the Witch Is Dead”) and – for reasons I cannot imagine – forwarded Douglas Penick’s dictated response to Boulder Police Department. Boulder Police Department is all over this story. After attempting to leave “Officer Maurice Hampton” a message with “Officer Garrin – LAPD” – some time ago – Officer Storbeck of Boulder Police Department rolled into Deneuve Construction (with the Police Chief’s secretary) to determine if I was dangerous to myself or others. He was armed and clearly far more dangerous than I. The Denver FBI instructed me to contact the Boulder District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General of Colorado. To date, I have heard nothing from either with respect to their investigations into this deadly serious matter. I did hear from the Attorney General of Colorado’s Office. They advised me to go into Court and request that a Special Prosecutor be appointed after I wrote them that I was the victim of cyber-terrorism, cyber-stalking, etc.
Rutger has witnessed a tremendous amount of insanity during this ordeal and was actually asked by Steven Clark Lindsey (immediately following the S.W.A.T. incident) to go into Cohen/Kory’s office and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Cohen and/or Kory. He also had his fingers ripped off in a meat grinder incident at Whole Foods. OSHA felt there might be criminal negligence on the part of Whole Foods and thought the District Attorney could look into that. Perhaps the phone messages I left regarding that “incident” were misconstrued as “harassment” by Pat Dixon. I was told by Gianelli and/or Blogonaut that Pat Dixon discussed my phone messages – to the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office – with Bruce Cutler. I intend to speak to Bruce Cutler personally about any and all conversations he had with your office about me.
The targeting of children is inconceivably brutal and I personally believe Steve Cooley and you are involved. No one on earth can convince me otherwise. I also believe the slander, etc. on Blogonaut’s Blog was timed to coincide with the Phil Spector appeal and the Clarkson civil suit. In any event, I view Rutger as a witness and am convinced that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark (and others) have engaged in witness retaliation, witness intimidation, and worse, with respect to my son. Since Lindsey emailed me that Cohen/Kory were encouraging him to take Ray away from me (after the conversation he witnessed) it is clear that he too is the victim of witness retaliation and intimidation. The entire custody matter appears to be nothing other than an attempt to coerce me into a deal with Cohen and an attempt to obstruct justice.
Blogonaut publicly noted that he/Gianelli made an “educated guess” about the content of your email to me. I find that absurd. Blogonaut noted that you contacted its Blog with respect to my extremely public emails. Investigator William Frayeh, who will receive a copy of this letter, said he would look into this situation. I will, of course, copy in the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury Department, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan. Irrational hardly begins to describe the following comment posted on Blogonaut’s Blog with respect to your email to me. It begins shamelessly with “Uh.” That sets the tone. Blogonaut then publicly declares that the Department of Justice is on my “spam list” although I don’t believe I have spammed anyone – least of all the Department of Justice. I don’t know if I received a “substantive communication” from you but the reason I was focused on Blogonaut’s Blog is due to the fact that I thought you, the District Attorney of Los Angeles, and possibly the Clarkson family or their lawyers, might somehow be associated with and/or communicating with this Blog. Leonard Cohen’s advisers were and Blogonaut has publicly noted that. Nothing about you, as Phil Spector’s “prosecutor,” can be viewed as “simply nothing more than” anything. You are communicating with a Blog that is dead set on maligning me – based entirely on lies. Why did Blogonaut have to point out that it would “endeavor” when it hit “reply all” to remove you from my extremely public emails that are being sent to government agencies, law enforcement agencies, and the newsmedia. Endeavor means “to attempt” or “to make an effort.” That makes absolutely no sense – whatsoever – in this context and Blogonaut/Gianelli, I might point out, is a lawyer and a liar. This is blatant legal maneuvering at its most shameless. There was no “educated guess” about your email to me. You wrote Blogonaut and I confirmed what you said in your email to me. This did not send me into a tizzy. It confirmed my worst suspicions. It did generate emails to “high places” – to quote Blogonaut/Gianelli in all his arrogant glory: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. It also prompted a phone call, by me, to Agent Wynar/Special Agent FBI who has apparently been asked – by Blogonaut/Gianelli – to investigate whether or not I am “spamming” the Treasury. In conclusion, I would like to point out something that I feel strongly about – that is not only frivolous, probably criminal, it is a waste of resources that the FBI could better spend on things like protecting our citizens from terrorism. I do not like phoning Agent Wynar, or the FBI in Denver, actually. It seems preposterous to me but I have been forced into this position and do not have a choice. Beyond that, there is official misconduct and law enforcement conduct that crosses state borders at hand. You might understand the seriousness of this situation better than I.
Blogonaut said…
Uh, the reason that we knew that Alan Jackson’s email to KL, that KL was touting to the DOJ (and her usual spam list) as a substantive communication from the Spector prosecutor was simply nothing more that a request to drop him from the cc list–was that we received the same request from Mr. Jackson yesterday, we pointed out that the only one that could do this was Lynch—but we said that we would endeavor when we hit “reply-all” to one of Lynch’s emails to make sure he was not copied with our reply.
No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).
http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/07/phillip-spector-appeal-update-record-
on.html
Ed Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, informed me that if the IRS Commissioner believes this is fraud and not negligence he will come in after the lawyers and accountants as well. One can only hope and pray that Kory is at the top of the list of lawyers – together with Scott Edelman/Gibson, Dumb and Dumber who had no qualms “seizing” evidence they understood I intended to send to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Of course, I wasn’t served that lawsuit and have noticed that rotten lawyers who lie for a living think they are above the law and tend to ignore due process. In light of what has happened it was shocking to read that you view my emails as “spam.” It made me realize that you are a vicious and sadistic individual who is capable of anything. I realize my emails may be unwanted but they are definitely not “spam.”
For the record, Phil Spector and I had dinner and drinks after the Lana Clarkson incident and I asked him – point blank – if he shot Clarkson. He told me that he did not. Rather, Clarkson was apparently dancing around in his foyer singing “Da Doo Run Run” prior to shooting herself. This “theory” is supported by forensic science and the expert opinions of Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, and Dr. James Pex. To assume that these men would conspire to lie and destroy their careers is blatantly ridiculous. Furthermore, I know Mr. Spector, believe he is absolutely innocent, and will continue to stand by him come hell or high water. That is what friends do. They do not betray people, sell stories to the news media, and fabricate or revise the past for their own suspect reasons and/or motives.
I await your response to this question: why are my emails documenting the destruction of my life spam and did Pat Dixon personally authorize Blogonaut/Gianelli to publicly state that he feared for his life when I quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke?”
Sincerely,
/s/ Kelley Lynch
Enclosures
Posted On: Friday, Oct. 9 2009 @ 11:15AM
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
November 29th, 2009 at 1:12 am
These are not the facts. These are lies being told by “Not quite.” The judgment was obtained based on fraud and perjury. The evidence i’ve provided the IRS proves that I was not a trustee and a complete and proper forensic accounting that takes into consideratino the assets Cohen’s accountant (Kevin Prins-Moss Adams) and others need to be valued and made part of that accounting. Cohen has gone to etraordinary lengths in his attempts to silence me, prevent me from undertaing a full and complete proper forensic accounting, and covering up his conduct that I view as criminal and/or blaming it on other people.
Agent Kelly Sopko will have to take the witness stand the state, for the record, if she made a misake when she provided me with her email. If the answer is yes she should lose her job because she is incompetent and wastes taxpayer dollars for frivoolus and malicious reasons. I will subpoenaher “job decription” and want more details about her training as a Treasury investigator.
Lnch continues to maintain that Alan Jakson should be investigated by the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI Clearly he is being investigated by Phil Spector his legal team, and - no doubt - his investigators.
Kelley Lynch holds Leonard Cohen, Steven Clark Lindsey, and the District Attorney and others personally responsible for the “involuntary commitments” and “wrongful arrests,” etc. and for the fact that law enforcement targeted her. To think otherwise is evidence of insanity Unfortunately for these maniacs, the doctors did not agree with the mindless actions of “cops” who apparently think they are the foot soldiers of the Lost Angeles District Attorney. I believe they are sadly mistaken.
The comments stand - as does the clear campaign to harass, threaten, terrorize, adn silence me and my family and friends.
Kelley Lynch
No quite says:
Kelley Lynch is Leonard Cohen’s former manager.
She claims that Cohen, acting with the LAPD and others, conspired to “destroy her life”.
The facts are:
1. On May 12, 2006, a Los Angeles court entered a $7 million judgment against Lynch for theft from and mismanagement of Cohen’s estate. That judgment was never appealed and is final and binding. Moreover, even before this judgment was entered, Lynch’s life was on a downward spiral.
2. Based on Lynch’s harassment of the singer/songwriter, Lynch obtained two civil harassment restraining orders (one in CA and one in Colorado) against Lynch. Lynch has blatantly violated both court orders.
3. In response to the civil lawsuit that Cohen filed against Lynch in 2005, Lynch contacted the IRS and accused Cohen of tax fraud. Cohen has never been prosecuted by the IRS for tax fraud—or for anything else.
4. Lynch met once with a special agent of the United States Treasury who made the mistake of providing Lynch with her email address. For three years Lynch has sent this poor civil servant THOUSANDS of emails—sometimes a half-dozen a day—ranting about Cohen and all who dare disagree with her off-the-wall discussion board posts.
5. Among other things, Lynch as emailed the Justice Department demanding that Phil Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, and has an email spam list of over 100 recipients (governors, prosecutors, IRS, Justice, police departments, high profile lawyers, journalists etc.) that she emails several times a week on subjects ranging from why this or that anonymous commenter should be investigated or arrested to why certain bloggers should be incarcerated.
6. Kelley Lynch claims she has suffered at least two involuntary psychiatric commitments and that she has been “frequently” arrested.
I could go on for ten thousand words about Kelley Lynch, but suffice it to say that what she says should be taken with 300 pounds of salt.
Posted On: Friday, Aug. 28 2009 @ 3:35PM
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
November 29th, 2009 at 1:16 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: I Find This Criminal - Some Of It Relates To “Alan Jackson”
To: “GIANELLI” , “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, billpavelic@aol.com, Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net, dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:15 AM
Not So Fast Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 1:12 am
These are not the facts. These are lies being told by “Not quite.”
November 29th, 2009 at 1:19 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: I Find This Criminal - Some Of It Relates To “Alan Jackson”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:17 AM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Do you think these people are technically “criminally insane?”
Love,
Kelley
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
November 29th, 2009 at 1:23 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: I Find This Criminal - Some Of It Relates To “Alan Jackson”
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Kelley Lynch”
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:22 AM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
And a “special” agent, no less. I want her job description and training history.
Love,
Kelley
November 29th, 2009 at 1:34 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Rand Hoffman - Re: Eiminem
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Kelley Lynch” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:33 AM
Rand,
I have not been accused of plagarizing Eminem (re. Mariah Carey and Puke) yet. Please do let me know if Aftermath has any issues with my quoting the lyrics of “Puke” on the world-wide public internet.
Phil Bronstein/SF Chronicle has not supported the allegations of copyright infringement that were raised on Phawker. Paul Huebl has not supported the allegations of copyright infringement that were raised on Phawker. And, Dennis Riordan has not supported the allegations of copyright infringement with respect to his article on innocent people ensnared by malicious prosecutors and police misconduct - “the system” that works so well for criminals.
I do hope Dr. Dre, Eminem, and the crew at Aftermath don’t think Sergeant Joe/LAPD’s comments about evidence that appears to have been hid by LAPD (in the Biggie Smalls “wrongful” death matter) are too frivolous or irrelevant. I thought they were astounding and frightening.
All the best,
Kelley
November 29th, 2009 at 1:36 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Re: Rand Hoffman - Re: Eiminem
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Kelley Lynch” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:35 AM
P.S. “Puke” really did address my views of “Pat Dixon” thoroughly and completely . I hope Eminem doesn’t find that to be a sexual turn on. Usually when someone makes you want to Puke you’re not “fantasizing” about them but this is a twisted crowd - so anything’s possible!
November 29th, 2009 at 1:38 am
Kelley would like to dedicate this to Pat Dixon and point out that most people don’t have sexual fantasies about people who make them Puke or want to Puke. There I go - thinkin of you again … I’ll hand it over to Eminem now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AmCIryu6Q
November 29th, 2009 at 1:43 am
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Why Was Pat Dixon Talking To Bruce Cutler About Me - Is He A Pervert?
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Kelley Lynch” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:41 AM
P.S. Rand, I’m going to post these lyrics on Phawker.com that I found on the wordwide web relating to the live version of Eminem’s “Puke.” I sure hope Eminem doesn’t get mad at me for enclosing his photograph in my email letter to Alan Jackson that Investigator Frayeh assured me he delivered to Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, and Truc Do. I thought he looked terriby sexy and handsome in that photograph. Kelley
[Eminem puking]
There I go thinking of you again
[Chorus]
You don’t know how sick you make me
You make me fucking sick to my stomache
Everytime I think of you I puke
You must just not knoooooowww
You may not think you do
But you do everytime I think of you I puke
[Verse 1]
I was gonna take the time to sit down and write you a little poem
But off of the dome would probably be a little more
More suitable for this type of song woah
I got a million reasons off the top of my head that I can think of
Sixteen bars this ain’t enough to put some ink to
So fuck it I’ma start right here I’ll just be briefer
Bout to rattle off some other reasons
I know I shouldnt go and get another tattoo of you on my arm
But what do I go and do? I go and get another one now I got two
Oooooh now I’m sittin here with your name on my skin
I can’t believe I went and did this stupid shit again
My next girlfriend now her name’s gotta be Kim (shiiiiiiit)
If you only knew how much I hated you
For every mothafuckin thing you ever put us through
Then I wouldnt be standin here cryin over you booooooooo
[Chorus]
You don’t know how sick you make me
You make me fucking sick to my stomache
Everytime I think of you I puke
You must just not knoooooowww
You may not think you do
But you do everytime I think of you I puke
[Verse 2]
I was gonna take the time to sit down and write you a little letter
But I thought a song would probably be a little better instead of a letter
That you’d probably just shred up, yeah, I stumbled on your picture yesterday and it made me stop and think of how much of a waste
It would be for me to put some ink to a stupid piece of paper
I’d rather let you see how much I fucking hate you in a freestyle
You’re a fucking coke head slut I hope you fucking die
I hope you get to hell and Satan sticks a needle in your eye
I hate your fucking guts you fucking slut I hope you die (diiiiiie)
But please don’t get me wrong I’m not bitter I’m mad
It’s not that I still love you its not ’cause I want you back
It’s just that when I think of you it makes me wanna yack(yaaaaaack)
But what else can I do I havent gotta clue
Now I guess I just move on I have no choice but to
But everytime I think of you now all I want to do is puuuuuke
[Chorus]
You don’t know how sick you make me
You make me fucking sick to my stomache
Everytime I think of you I puke
You must just not knoooooowww
You may not think you do
But you do everytime I think of you I puke
[Outro]
[Eminem puking]
Fucking bitch
Send “Puke” Ringtones to Cell
November 29th, 2009 at 2:00 am
Sydney Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Kelly Green, why not join the rest of us on Blogonaut’s web site at http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/11/kelley-lynchphil-spector-friend-or.html. Best part about it? Kelley is banned…
November 29th, 2009 at 2:03 am
Note: It is not 2 AM in my time zone. I ave two witnesses sitting in the room with me.
Kelley Lynch
— On Sun, 11/29/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:
From: Kelley Lynch
Subject: Sydney’s Post On Phawker About Blogonaut’s Blog On Me - Trashing Me
To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , “Sopko Kelly A TIGTA” , “doronweinberg” , Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “Kelley Lynch” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov
Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com, “RandHoffman” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “m.j. smith” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, “OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL” , “MEDIA RELATIONS PIO” , chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, “Teresa Low” , “PIU” , “CHEWY GURU”
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 5:59 AM
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Sydney’s comment is gratuitous but relevant. And, it’s addressed to “kellygreen” who first threatened Rutger publicly.
Love,
Kelley
Sydney Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Kelly Green, why not join the rest of us on Blogonaut’s web site at http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/11/kelley-lynchphil-spector-friend-or.html. Best part about it? Kelley is banned…
November 29th, 2009 at 2:12 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; mpduke1@msn.com; david@mccourt.org; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Cc: nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 10:11:04 PM
Subject: For The Record - Here’s The Email Gianelli Sent To pemathumpo@yahoo.com
To the IRS and FBI,
The only information he didn’t want to hear, apparently, is that Nona Banks (who knows me) thought he and the other posters sounded like lunatics and confirmed that she thinks I’m a wonderful person and, essentially, that they are liars. What difference does it make how long Nona Banks has known me? She knows me, we have spent a great deal of time together - hanging out, going to church, job interviews, etc. - and these people who have targeted me at all. What did someone else who had spent time with me confirm for Agent Wynar/FBI - she would stake her life on my credibility. How about Ethel’s comment to Agent Wynar/FBI - that addressing issues having to do with slander, etc. (particularly for a parent whose children have been targeted) is most certainly and definitely not slander, etc. I am paraphrasing by way of explanation. She is a wonderful Mother and runs a daycare. Her children are beautifully behaved and adorable - as is she.
All the best,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
To: Kelley Lynch ; Kelley Lynch ; Rutger Penick ; mpduke1@msn.com; info@softwheresolutions.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 2:26:11 AM
Subject: Re:
This is more information than I need to know.
November 29th, 2009 at 2:31 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; mpduke1@msn.com; david@mccourt.org; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
Cc: nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 10:30:06 PM
Subject: Re: For The Record - Here’s The Email Gianelli Sent To pemathumpo@yahoo.com
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Look at how aggressive kellygreen (who was “invited” to trash me on Blogonaut’s latest lies about me) is about Phillip killing Lana Clarkson. I wonder if the DEA agrees that “whether or not Lana Clarkson took prescription vicodin - and mixed it with alcohol and possibly other substances - endangered Phil Spector’s life. Why was it “foolish” of Phillip to keep a fun in a drawer in his private residence and not outrageous for a woman to be going through his drawers - which is implied in this posting.
Diane Ogden’s son, Sean, certainly seemed to think his mother looked sick and was being slowly poisoned by something and appeared to be excruciatingly upset about what he referred to as this “fucking trial.” Phillip told me what happened and it was supported by the conclusions of five major forensic scientists who have been slandered, trash, and maligned by his “so called prosecutor.” This jeopardizes the lives of innocent people, thereby violating their civil rights, in any and all future prosecutions where they are called to the witness stand to offer their testimony based on their scientific findings. The fact that Jackson called one of them a high paid liar is unconsionable and proves just how aggressive and arrogant this man is. If legally Jackson and Do, et al., were not permitted to personally assault Phil Spector’s character - why were they permitted to personally assault Dr. Lee, Dr. Baden, Dr. Spitz, Dr. Pex, and Dr. DeMaio? All five men independently concluded that Clarkson shot herself and the gun shot was self-inflicted. You don’t think that would be Jackson’s motive? Perhaps he finds that harassing but I find it criminal and believe the DOJ and FBI should investigate it. The civil trials are now over. There is no reason for the federal government to wait to see how things “shake out” on appeal. There is a record of the trials, they were recorded for television, there is evidence presented before the court and by the court (from my perspective) or endorsed by the court who appeared to be convinced that Phillip was guilty and should have - absolutely - recused himself because he himself denied Phil Spector “two fair trials.” This may be why John Guido felt Larry Fidler, personally, should be held accountable for his actions. He understands guns and he understood the forensic evidence. He also is a gun owner which is quite common in New Jersey. I personally believe Cooley understood that raising the “gun” issue alone would nail an innocent celebrity and that’s precisely why charges were brought. That had to have been taken into consideration. These trials, as Bruce Cutler has pointed out, are rehearsed and they are staged. To say otherwise is a lie. I think part of the reason I find all of this so shockingly unconscionable is because I have worked for men like Judge Marvin Katz and cannot even imagine him engaging in such shockingly egregious and unconscionable conduct. I cannot imagine Mr. Messermith participating in such a sham. I cannot imagine Irving David Pincus, of all men, participating in conduct like this. I cannot see Marty Machat, Jules Zalon, Peter Shukat, and other men I have worked for and with participating in what appears to be intentional criminal conduct that now includes targeting me and my family and friends.
I want the IRS and FBI to pick up the documents that have now exposed me, Ruter, Ray, Karen, David, and Douglas to extremely serious threats and dangerously unstable and arrogant human beings who are absolute liars and shamelessly rotten logicians. The IRS and FBI are now exposed - to serious legal issues and their policies will not help. I do not see them in the Constitution of the United States of America. They have nothing to do with due process of law and other constitutional protections. These policies protect them. They do not protect the citizens of the United States. I will take a look at the protections that should be extended to so-called whistle blowers when I have time. I am now paying exacting detail to the threats and terrorism taking place with respect to me, my family and friends. Nona Banks, who is not an IRS and/or FBI investigator, was able to determine - and stated clearly - that these people are lunatics. That means my family, friends, and I have been exposed to lunatics who are targeting me and now threatening us over evidence that relates to a possible federal prosecution. Try to wrap your mind around that in the context of what is presently taking place - all over the internet, all over the United States, and extends to Denmark and possibly other countries. These individuals are sitting in their homes, offices, or somewhere in this country and/or world typing this garbage and their lies meant to silence me and undermine me. They must think I am stupid. I know they are.
Love,
Kelley
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:43 am
Whether or not Lana Clarkson took perscription vicodin did not endanger Spector’s life—the gun HE foolishly kept in a drawer endangered Lana Clarkson’s life—he killed her.
What gives you the authority to decide if Diane Ogden looked high or was delusional while testifying? Neither of us was present in the courtroom; although I did watch her testimony on tv and she neither appeared high or delusional.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; mpduke1@msn.com; david@mccourt.org; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Cc: nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 10:11:04 PM
Subject: For The Record - Here’s The Email Gianelli Sent To pemathumpo@yahoo.com
To the IRS and FBI,
The only information he didn’t want to hear, apparently, is that Nona Banks (who knows me) thought he and the other posters sounded like lunatics and confirmed that she thinks I’m a wonderful person and, essentially, that they are liars. What difference does it make how long Nona Banks has known me? She knows me, we have spent a great deal of time together - hanging out, going to church, job interviews, etc. - and these people who have targeted me at all. What did someone else who had spent time with me confirm for Agent Wynar/FBI - she would stake her life on my credibility. How about Ethel’s comment to Agent Wynar/FBI - that addressing issues having to do with slander, etc. (particularly for a parent whose children have been targeted) is most certainly and definitely not slander, etc. I am paraphrasing by way of explanation. She is a wonderful Mother and runs a daycare. Her children are beautifully behaved and adorable - as is she.
All the best,
Kelley
——————————————————————————–
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
To: Kelley Lynch ; Kelley Lynch ; Rutger Penick ; mpduke1@msn.com; info@softwheresolutions.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 2:26:11 AM
Subject: Re:
This is more information than I need to know.
However, Rutger Penick is an adult; it is YOU that have embroiled him, Doug Penick, Karen Lynch, and David McCourt in your controversies, and as long as you continue to email this office or Blogonaut at all (let alone 20 times or more a day) I am going to make sure they are aware of it. Particularly if your emails relate to accusations that this office or Blogonaut “threatened” your adult son with “prison” which never happened.
I also find it more than ironic that you have threatened countless people on hundreds of occasions (including the undersigned) with “arrest”, prosecution and “prison”, but the minute a blogger points our that by storing documents in your son’s storage in violation of a court order you may have exposed your son Rutger to criminal legal consequences (which is not a threat, it is pointing out that you have embroiled your son in your legal mess) then you scream bloody murder to the FBI/IRS/Department of the Treasury.
Finally, since you brought it up, are you sure Rutger Penick, Doug Penick, Karen Lynch, David McCourt, and Ray Lindsey, Jr. wish to be further involved in your malicious attempt to maliciously prosecute others by talking with the FBI/IRS?
Perhaps you should have asked THEM first.
Please do not email this office or Blogonaut in the future. I do not know with whom your are meeting, nor do I need to know what “Nona” (who obviously has not known you long—or if she has much about you) thinks.
I have a feeling that the IRS, the FBI, The Justice Department, agent Sopko, Governor Ritter, the mayor of Houston, prosecutor Alan Jackson, and the many others on your spam email CC list do not much care either.
Finally, neither Blogonaut nor this office has “targeted” your adult son Rutger Penick. That sounds nice and dramatic, but is a false statement.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Gianelli-Blogonaut,
I didn’t think you would want to see that Nona Banks called you and the others a “lunatic.”
Stop writing my son Rutger.
I did not say I have a planned meeting with the IRS/FBI, Liar. You twist and distort everything. I said I want to meet with IRS and FBI agents. I want Rutger to meet with IRS and FBI agents. I want to give the copies of evidence I am now reviewing (all of which may previously have been sent to the IRS) - to avoid any further threats about Rutger, prison, or aiding and abetting. The only aiding and abetting going on here is with you and the others who apparently think it’s amusing to derail a possibly pending federal prosecution or prosecutions, lie to the FBI, and disparage Agent Sopko. I also said that IRS and FBI agents should phone my parents, sister and her husband, and Douglas Penick. I didn’t say they should meet with them at this time. And, finally (perhaps most importantly because what has happened to this child is unconscionable), I would like an IRS and FBI agent to meet with my son Ray, privately, at his father’s home or after work in California. After work might be best so his father can’t attempt to intimidate him or work him over afterwards. John Southard and I heard him working Ray over and the violence of his tone was appalling. Maybe Lindsey should be concerned about “aiding and abetting” which is far more realistic. Rutger does not have to be. There are, no doubt, laws about handing over evidence of criminal conduct to the IRS and protections for “whistle blowers” and/or witnesses - otherwise every criminal thug on earth could attempt to intimidate honest people, their families, children, and attempt to scare them into silence. It’s not going to happen. You are a liar.
I can’t believe you know them either. That tells me your obsession is real and should be taken very very seriously.
I never said your arrest was imminent. Write the “feds” and play your shameless, rotten, criminal games with them. Perhaps they’re amused - or would be if you targeted them and their families and chlidren.
K. Lynch
— On Sat, 11/28/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
Subject:
To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , mpduke1@msn.com
Date: Saturday, November 28, 2009, 1:51 AM
November 27, 2009:
Dear Ms. Lynch:
Good luck with your planned meeting with the FBI/IRS, Rutger and Doug Penick.
However, I really don’t need to know, and don’t care, what you have to say to “Nona”, or any of your other correspondents or to Rutger, Doug, Karen, David, or about Ray Charles Lindsey.
Frankly, I cannot believe I even know who most of these people are.
How about you stop writing me and let the federal authorities take it from here, since my arrest is so “imminent”.
November 29th, 2009 at 2:55 am
For the record, Kelley, Dennis Riordan is a top-notch attorney; undoubtedly, one of the finest in the country. You, Kelley, are at best, a distraction to Mr. Riordan et al. Just how much more time will Spector’s appellate team have to work on Spector’s appeal if you will just leave them alone? How much time do they wasted every day with your non-sense spam emails and your drivel laden voice mail messages? Perhaps they block your emails and don’t listen to your voice mails. How much time can the appellate team waste and how much money can Spector waste having his appellate team indulge in your fantasies?
November 29th, 2009 at 3:01 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; mpduke1@msn.com; david@mccourt.org; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
Cc: nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 10:59:28 PM
Subject: Garrison Courtney - DEA
Hello Garrison Courtney,
No one’s mentioning the DEA. I guess I’ve struck a very serious chord here - somehow. I am not sure why because they don’t mind playing serious games with and insulting the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Sopko, the Treasury and/or Agent Wynar/FBI - unless he slandered me which I will absolutely find out. There is no doubt about that. There is also no doubt about the fact that my friend, Phil Spector, will want to know precisely what has gone on here, as it relates to me, and why Gianelli-Blogonaut contacted Investigator William Frayeh, what he was actually “communicating” with Alan Jackson, and why he called Agent Wynar/FBI. To assume otherwise is utterly preposterous. He is an innocent man sitting in prison. Do you understand guns, Mr. Courtney? How about forensic science, malicious prosecutions, and police misconduct? Do you understand that? Do you understand comments like Marco’s about the FBI - “Tell the Denver FBI Merry Christmas.” You should have heard how angry this maniac was. It is abnormal conduct. He is a shameless thug. Period. There are no ands, ifs and/or buts about it. What I have experienced with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office is shocking and outlandish government conduct. Unprofessional hardly begins to address it. I have never witnessed conduct like this in my entire life.
Who prescribed this “therapy” for Lana Clarkson? My girlfiend’s doctor immediately halted her use of vicodin - and she will
and does discuss this publicly and saw right through this garbage including the blood spatter evidence and the women that were dragged out of the “gutter” to testify against Phillip - when she clearly became immune to the effects and started taking more and more pills to deal with excruciating pain related to a “spinal fusion” she had. They or he immediately put her in the hospital and put her on the pure narcotic and were gravely concerned about the quantity of tylenol going through her liver.
Is it the DEA’s formal position that having the equivalent of 12 vicodin and mixing that with alcohol produces clear thinking? Or is it the DEA’s formal position that prescription drug abuse is acceptable, should be tolerated, and everyone in prison and/or jail for it and their doctors should immediately be released? It cannot be both ways. It must be one conclusion. Some people go to prison and/or jail for prescription drug abuse and/or illegally prescribing them (which is a fascinating concept from my perspective and I want to know what determines that - scientifically, by law, and as it relates to the body weight and “tolerance” the individual has built up over time) and others are glamorized by the Los Angeles District Attorney. Can you tell me how this maniac is going to prosecute anything having to do with Michael Jackson’s apparent homicide? Doesn’t that seem positively schizophrenic to you? It does to me. Why has the DEA investigated the deaths of Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith, and Heath Ledger and not Phil Spector who is alive and rotting in a horrendous prison and whose life is definitely in danger. Can you explain that, Mr. Courtney because I am waiting for that answer from the DEA. All of America should hear that answer. Are these investigations randomly selected - I am specifically referring to high profile matters. Are these investigations based on whether or not the DEA liked the person or found them physically attractive or physically appalling? How about if someone at the DEA dated someone loosely affiliated with a matter? Would that prevent a proper investigation? If a DEA agent thought Anna Nicole Smith was sexually attractive would that spur on an investigation? If Alan Jackson effectively demonizes Phil Spector does that successfully prevent and prohibit the DEA from investigating the suicides of Lana Clarkson and Diane Ogden. What trial does the DEA think Sean Ogden was referring to when addressing his mother’s death? Keep in mind that she appears to have died of an overdose and the details of that death have not all been revealed. The restraining order against Sean Ogden really struck me. What does he know, who knows he knows it, and why is he being silenced? Where does he live Mr. Courtney?
How many lives have to be destroyed before the DEA steps up to the plate and begins an investigation into the obvious suicide of Lana Clarkson, the obvious targeting of Phil Spector, his legal team and advisers, forensic scientists, the death of Diane Ogden - a witness in the matter, and other issues? Do I need to start a petition? One petition devoted to Mr. Spector resulted in a young woman in England receiving a death threat and emails from someone criminally impersonating Bruce Cutler - which these thugs who have targeted have publicly blamed me for and will now have to prove the impossible. I personally reported that to the DOJ and Interpol. I would not play games when my friend’s life is literally at stake. Would you? Would the DEA? Does Mr. Spector have to die in prison in order for a complete and proper investigation, by the DEA, Immigration, the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, and probably other agencies, is undertaken. Are all these federal agencies now being controlled by Steve Cooley, Pat Dixon, Doug Sortino, Alan Jackson, Truc Do, Larry Fidler and a bunch of rotten clearly corrupt, lying government officials and law enforcement agents and agencies?
Did you see Bill Pavelic’s allegations? The DEA is working alongside LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit on a very very high-profile matter relating to Michael Jackson. Does it concern the DEA that Bill Pavelic has publicly stated that he, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaliation for the OJ trial. If not - why not? Are you a reckless agency and are your agents illiterate and willing to be targeted?
For the record, these questions are not rhetorical. I intend to subpoena someone from the DEA to take the stand because I have been dragged into this insanity and my family is now being targeted and threatened. It is, therefore, relevant. Utterly.
All the best,
Kelley
November 29th, 2009 at 3:04 am
Kelley, if you had only observed and honored the 7 P’s you wouldn’t be in such dire straights and your kids would be in a “good” college: Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance.
After all the money you stole from Cohen, you didn’t even think about squirreling any of it away into a college fund for your kids. Shame on you!
And I’ve never threatened your son, Rutger. Let’s review: a court ordered you to return the items you took from Cohen. You did not. You admit you stored the “stolen” materials in Rutger’ storage unit. You deliberately involved your son—someone else to take the fall for you? You continue to return those items. Yes, Kelley, even though you continue to disregard a court order, and because you just had to drag your son into this (why should mama go down alone?); therefore, your son is aiding and abetting you. Look up the penalties for aiding and abetting. Prison is a possibility. No sane person who reads this I can’t put your kid in prison. Perhaps you can find sane, logical, residents at the shelter who will read and interpret postings for you. Although, later this evening you stated: “I can assure you (because I know them) that no one thinks the fact that Rutger was threatened with prison.” Therefore, I guess you’ve cleared up your entire Rutger and prison issue: not even you believe he will b arrested.
Kelley, we know, when it comes to you own kids, you don’t give a damn about consequences; however, a loving, sane, and concerned mother never involves her children in her own sick, sick revenge fantasies. The only person who is, and continues to be, a threat to your children is you, Kelley.
Actually, the only person your entire family has to fear is you. In your postings, you have and continue to bully your family. No one posting on any blog wants to see anything happen to your parents, your son, your sister and brother-in-law. Quite the contrary, and I’m going out on a limb here and report we all have great empathy and sympathy for your entire family. How sad, disappointed, and heartbroken they must be.
You are a sad, pathetic shell of a human, Kelley Lynch. I want nothing from you. I continue to hope someone loves you enough to see to it you get the necessary psychiatric care you need and deserve.
November 29th, 2009 at 3:08 am
Kelley, after yesterdays posting in which you made reference to if you were a DEA agent or ran the DEA…well, everyone just quit paying attention. You. A DEA agent. No. Fortunately, the DEA has standards.
November 29th, 2009 at 3:11 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; mpduke1@msn.com; david@mccourt.org; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
Cc: nonacbanks@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 11:08:56 PM
Subject: Re: Garrison Courtney - DEA
P.S. Perhaps the DEA can also explain what Diane Ogden witnessed and why she thought there was a “dead girl” here when she did not witness the Clarkson suicide. Was she hallucinating? Attempting to please the prosecutors? That was and remains a bizarre comment. Inconceivably bizarre. That’s when Bruce Cutler moved to strike, I believe.
November 29th, 2009 at 3:14 am
This is priceless, simply priceless: “Lindsey, however, attempted to drag Ron Burkle’s friend (former President of the United States Bill Clinton) into this by filing an email that referenced Ron and President Clinton. I have no idea why. President Clinton didn’t witness anything but he is Ron’s friend and Ray had a “sleep over” with him at Ron’s house. Lindsey knows this. Ron was gracious enough to give us photographs and a letter from one of President Clinton’s employees on official letterhead.”
So now Kelley knows President Clinton; and she has an established relationship with a Clinton employee who foolishly sent her photos and a real letter on official letterhead—afterall, since Ray and Bill had a “sleepover” at Ron Burkle’s house they all must be life-long pals, right?. Are we to believe Cohen arranged this “sleepover” so he could drag Clinton into Kelley’s fiasco fantasy?
November 29th, 2009 at 3:17 am
It’s outrageous that hard working, productive citizens of the US are wasting their tax dollars so the gov’t can indulge you in your fantasies, Kelley. It’s just a matter of time before you push a federal agency too far—and, hopefully, it’ll be soon so you will be forced to attend a Chapter 51 hearing (1051) and be forced into treatment.
Apparently Agent Wynar/FBI no longer believes the crap you spew. Now you accuse Agent Wynar/FBI of sabotaging FBI and IRS investigations. Really, thousands of G &T-men and you, and only you, have discovered a rogue agent. Apparently, the planet is safe and world peace awaits us!
I hope you call your good friend, the federal judge. Perhaps after receiving lunatic messages from you, he will call upon ALL his available resources and begin the process to get you the psychiatric help you need.
November 29th, 2009 at 3:21 am
Good, God, Kelley, are you accusing Gianell-Blogonaut of murder: “Are you clear about an issue I would rather not discuss on the internet? If he’d murder his own nephews imagine what he might do to me?” Oh that pesky indefinite pronoun reference. Lynch, you are a vicious, vengeful ‘whatever’, who will say anything and implicate people in crimes you know they never committed. Post this little gem on your website and see how long it takes google to shut you down!
November 29th, 2009 at 3:27 am
For months Lynch has proclaimed she has “original” documents that prove Cohen has defrauded the gov’t. Posters have reminded Lynch that she is under a court order to return those documents to Cohen. All of a sudden, she has only PHOTOCOPIES of the documents—she no longer has the originals. Lynch is a master of cut and paste (just look at any of her posts: she freely takes from other posters and then adds her comments, rinse, repeat, yada yada yada….)
Even though she has mastered cut and paste, she has yet to master pronoun reference: who ever knows to whom Lynch is referring? Should Lynch ever master pronoun reference, she could have a future composing for fantasy website and outlets. Kelley, you are a story-teller. Just a story-teller. Unfortunately, you are unable to separate fact from fantasy.
November 29th, 2009 at 3:50 am
OK, it’s late and I ‘m about to pack it in, then I came across this curious tidbit: “This jeopardizes the lives of innocent people, thereby violating their civil rights, in any and all future prosecutions where they are called to the witness stand to offer their testimony based on their scientific findings.”
Just WTF can Lynch be talking about? Other than Lana Clarkson, whose civil rights were violated? Scientific findings don’t have civil rights—do they? Can she possibly be talking about expert witnesses? How is an expert witness’ civil rights violated when he/she testifies?
November 29th, 2009 at 4:31 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com; Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov; Governor.ritter@state.co.us; governor@governor.ca.gov; attorney.general@ag.ky.gov; attorney.general@state.co.us; stan.garnett@gmail.com; gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov; lhank@bouldercounty.org; Chief of PoliceJohn Hall ; limbomoe@yahoo.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 12:29:46 AM
Subject: Kelly Green - “Please elaborate on the following” Attn: IRS and FBI
To the IRS and FBI,
I must have missed these legal opinions of Kelly Green’s. I want protection and I want to know who Kelly Green is. I want these documents picked up at once. This is, technically, a set up. It is called entrapment - but it’s based on lies, fraud, perjury, malicious gossip, etc. Would you like to pick up the evidence now - why is Kelly Green referring to a crash and my family? This suggests someone may die - possibly in an accident, doesn’t it? I’m assuming Rachelle’s name was intentionally misspelled. They do not want me mailing Phil Spector anything and the guards and Phillip’s access to mail should be investigated - obviously - particularly in light of Terry Thornton’s comments as recounted by Ed Lozzi/Clarkson Famly. Look at the aggression and threats - not so veiled this person is publicly posting and explain to me why you aren’t protecting me and my family? I am now concerned that Rutger and/or Ray will be in an accident. Phawker Blog is apparently being threatened, not so subtly, with possible legal action.
Take a look at most the postings from Phawker. Do you actually think strangers, without motive, dropped by this Blog for no reason whatsoever in order to trash someone who is relatively unknown, focus on Colleen Chaney as an issue, and are speculating that Phillilp’s lawyers put me on an “unacceptable visitor’s list.” Now, I am not a Special Agent but some of you are. They are treatening my children and insinuating that there could be accidents.
Does the IRS and FBI understand that? If not - why don’t you?
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Kelley, you do know the CA DOC does not allow prisoners access to materials taken, and/or printed, from the internet—don’t you? Even though the DOC does ban internet material, most likely, Spector’s attorneys told the prison to never, ever, ever allow any mailings from you to be delivered to their client—Spector. In addition, most sane people will believe Spector’s attorneys have put your name on the “unacceptable” visitors list. Yes, Kelley, attorneys have the power and authority to restrict mail and visitor access. Oh, I’ve got an idea, why don’t you demand Rochelle include your name on the visitors registry. I’m sure she’ll be only too happy to comply with an order from you.
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:49 am
Kelley, the “evidence” you gave to the IRS was stolen from Leonard Cohen. Remember, the courts ordered you to return it to Cohen? Consequently, the IRS can’t use it against Cohen—fruit of the poisonous tree, and all.
You continue to proclaim everyone believes you and everyone agrees with you—yep, we’re the insane people; yet NOT ONE person has ever spoken out on your behalf. Not even on one of your many, many blogs. Kelley, it’s time to stick a fork in yourself. You’re done.
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 3:18 am
The posting you stole from Blogonaut: KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON? While you did acknowledge from whom you stole the opinion piece, you’ve failed to publish that all –important phrase: “reprinted with permission of….” Until you provide proof of permission to re-print a posting, you’ve just stolen the work of others.
The article you stole from the San Fransisco Chronicle, written by Dennis Riordan, was not re-printed with the permission of the SFC. You can notify the author as many times as you want; however, the SFC is a copyright protected publication. As always, Kelley, Once a thief….
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:39 am
Well, this clears up everything. According to Kelly, she and Phil are in this together—sit down and brace yourselves for this—because “after all, Rutger lost his fingers the same day (a few years apart) that Clarkson shot herself at his house and our karma is clearly intertwined.” Yes, Kelley, that clears up everything!
Only in your fantasy are Spector and Cohen intertwined with poor little ol’ you, you, you stuck in the middle. What’s that you say: Absolutely no one has come to your rescue. I wonder why.
Kelley, you continue to careen down the train track. We all know you’re headed for that big train wreck. Look in the mirror, Kelley, you have no one to blame but yourself. Afterall, you are the engineer, rear brakeman, and conductor. As you barrel down the track, you control your own destiny. Hpefully, after the crash, the only person you take out will be you. I think it’s safe to say we all pray your family survives your crash–a crash you purposely designed.
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:30 am
The odds of you ever getting info (with or without a subpoena) from any blog is negligible. Sure, Gianelli, Blogonaut, and Google are quaking in their collective boots. Most likely after receiving your bogus subpoenas, their corporate attorneys will ask a judge to order you to put-up-front a significant amount of cash (think of it as “earnest” money) to ensure you not only have the sufficient money and assets to follow through to trial but also to ensure (after you lose) you have sufficient money and assets to cover the blogs, attorney fees. That’s right, Kelley, after you lose the hearing, you have to pay for their legal fees. Given your track record,
Kelley, the judge will issue an order requiring you to put-up cash. If you don’t put-up the cash, your fantasy lawsuits will disappear just like pixie dust.
Let’s see, the blogs will employee constitutional scholars as their attorneys—attorneys who specialize in 1st Amendment issues. Only a fool who represents herself thinks she has sufficient money and assets to take on 1st Amendment attorneys.
You can’t afford to file a complaint, Kelley, let alone pay for attorney fees and subpoena service.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 12:23 am
Our point is that you are constantly promisng not to send anymore emails to Bill Pavelic, Blogonaut, Alan Jackson, and a certain investigator with the Los Angeles DA’s office, and without fail hours (or sometimes minutes later) we have more emails in our inbox, cc to all of those people.
Our point is that your word is routinely given and then broken minutes later.
Our point is that you (to oversimplify it) are a flake.
Kelly Green Says:
November 28th, 2009 at 2:24 am
Where was Kelley?
Kelley, Spector’s #1 fan attended every day of his trials—and she’s a PE teacher. On those days school was in session, she managed to come to the courthouse every day after school. She was present when the verdict was read and she was present when he was sentenced. Where were you, Kelley? Prior to the trials, Phil’s #1 fan had no interaction with Spector; however, she was a true fan and went out of her way, on a daily basis, to be there for Phil and Rochelle. Again, where were you, Kelley?
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 11:03 am
Apparently, you are too stupid to realize you and Susan Polk have a lot in common. You each descended into utter madness; you either have or you do think you’re the only person smart enough to handle your litigation; and you’ve each pulled your children into your personal pit of quick sand.
Such a sad, sad life you live Kelley. And it’s all of your own making.
Sydney Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Kelly Green - We are now witnessing one sorry excuse of a human being spiraling down into complete and utter madness. And have you noticed that not only has she hijacked this thread about Leonard Cohen, but she has also turned it into a thread about Phil Spector and the fairness of his trial(s). This woman is incredibly inventive and imaginative. Can you just imagine where she might be if she put what’s left of her brain to GOOD and quit fixating on people she doesn’t even know. To hear her talk, she knows everyone in the world and they will come to court because she’s going to subpoena every person she has ever encountered on-line. I, for one, am anxiously awaiting mine any day now.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Kelley, copyright issues are the concern of everyone. Taking credit for the work of others is shameful, illegal, and immoral. All you had to do was cite the source and get permission to reprint. I guess you really are that lazy. Once a thief…
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 10:46 am
My actions will not land me in prison—your actions may. You’re right, Kelley, not everyone is stupid—JUST YOU!
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 10:56 am
How do you know Kelley has lost the battle? She turns to personal insults: “Maybe an FBI profiler would have more insights into your “feminine traits” although I doubt they would jeopardize their lives dating someone like you with your violent fantasies and twisted, sadistic turn ons.”
For the record, Kelley, I’ve never put anyone’s life in jeopardy. I don’t need your dating advise. Who would? And, once again, “you are the only one who engages in spinning violent fantasie and twisted, sadistic turn ons.”
It’s truly unfortunate that you don’t have a life and that your family wants nothing to do with you.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:25 am
I guess all we can do is hope the IRS takes an immediate interest in you and your welfare. Hopefully, they will put you someplace where you will have no internet access, and for the sake of your family, no access to them either. Your family deserves better treatment than they’ve gotten from you. Why does your son always draw the short straw?
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am
Well, at least you’ve confirmed you stole 10 articles/postings from others—and you don’t even have the decency to cite the sources. You’ve also confirmed you just don’t give a damn. Oh well, Once a thief…
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:18 am
Yes, Kelley, all the posters on the internet got together and decided that you would the one person to be picked on.
You can do better than that.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:20 am
At any time, Kelley, you can open your blog so others can post. You choose not to. Why? What are you afraid of?
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 3:16 am
As usual, Kelley, you are the only one who thinks there’s a remote possibility you could be a helpful witness to anyone. You cherry pick words from the cogent statements of others—and you spin them it into fantasy.
It’s late, and you are boring. A rational person would be ashamed of herself for taking up so much bandwidth of anothers blog. Again, you seem to think if you keep repeating and reposting others posts and emails, that the repeated postings will make you more credible. They do not, you are not, and you never will be credible. Since 8:40 PM (11/26?09) you stole 10 postings/articles from others. And you posted each one here in hopes others would think you wrote them.
Since spring 2009, you’ve been repeating the same thing over and over and over again.
Your repeated responses and repeated postings are like those of a high school student. You remember, the one who always thought she was smarter and more clever than everyone else. And like a petulant highschooler, you foolishly think you wrote one great thesis—and you think you’re soooo much smarter than everyone else. And like a highschooler, you think all you have to do is change a few words–and voila—you have a new, up-to-date paper. It’s not until you get to college and you turn in that same paper, then you learn you’re just not that smart and clever afterall. So, Kelley, it’s time to tell you that you’re not that great or smart, and you need to come up with some new responses.
It’s time for you to get a new schtick.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:48 am
Actually, Kelley, the subject header of your email addressed to Alan Jackson reads: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:52 am
Kelley, from whom did you steal your 11/26/09, 8:40 PM, 8:41 PM, 8:42, 8:43 PM, 8:44 PM, 8:46 PM, 8:46PM, 10:02 PM, 10:04 PM, and 11/27/09 12:28 AM postings? Didn’t you steal these posting and published articles from others? There’s nothing to indicate you reprinted any of them with the authors’ permission. Stealing from the AP (your first 8:46 PM) is especially egregious and AP does take criminal and civil action. Let’s not forget, Linda Deutch was Spectors greatest supporter and fan. Linda Deutch never said a bad word about Spector. Oh, I remember, you don’t give a flying fig about other people’s copyrights.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:53 am
As far as your public allegations regarding the Clarkson’s attorney tampering with a witness—well, actually, Kelley, you’re the only person raising that allegation. No credible person has raised that issue.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:47 am
I believe it was yesterday, you stated you helped other children with camp fees, tuition, tutors, etc. While it’s admirable you helped those less fortunate, I’m amazed you didn’t establish a college fund for your children. Or did you have an established college fund? If you did have such a fund, did you loot that, too?
Another thing, did Rutger have your POA when SWAT descended upon you? If he didn’t, then it’s just your fantasy that anyone asked him to sign over your property to Cohen. You are living proof of the old adage: tell yourself something enough times and you’ll start to believe it’s true.
Kelly Green Says:
November 27th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.
Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.
Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.
As if dragging you own children deep into you personal pool of quick sand, now you intend to drag Dian Ogden’s son down with you. Just who the hell do you think you are?
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?
While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Now, Kelley, this is truly amazing: “I’m not interested in Leonard Cohen and he can drop dead (literally) for all I care.” In light of your statement/pronouncement and if you’re truly not interested in Cohen and you don’t care about Cohen, then why do continue to stalk, harass, and threaten him?
Wait just a minute. When I questioned your memory of the transport to “Killer King”, you corrected me and informed the blog world that you told the cops nothing. Are you now saying you did answer their questions? Wow, what a difference a day makes. And quit dragging Mick Brown into this. Either Cohen testified before the grand jury or he didn’t—just provide us with proof that he did or didn’t. If Mick Brown sent you emails regarding Cohen’s did he or didn’t he testify, you would have posted them by now. Leave Mick Brown out of this.
Are you still asking us to believe Cohen offered you 50/50 community property? Try to remember, Kelley, with the exception of Cohen’s ability to perform, you stole every asset he had. Cohen had nothing to split with you. I suppose it’s possible, just possible, Cohen was hoping you would return 50% of what you stole from him.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
“Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken - but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!
You continue to drag as many people as you possibly can into your litigations issues: you childre, parent, sister; Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Ron Burkle, Mick Brown, David Moorhead, Ronald Mitchell, to name but just a few.
“Oliver Stone is a friend of mine” Just how do you define the word friend, Kelley? Are your “friends” those to whom you’ve just waved at, those who exist in your fantasy land, imaginary friends, or are your friends those whom would die for you? Common sense would indicates most of your “friends” are, at best, fleeting acquaintances. Most likely, those to whom you refer to as “friends” have no idea who you are other than the psycho who stalks and spams them.
And just who is David Moorhead. Good lord, Kelley, do you just throw names out there in hopes that others will be impressed? Junior Gotti ring a bell? If Moorhead was an important witness, why didn’t he testify at Spector’s trials?
Who is Ronald Mitchell and why are you accusing him of murder? Did Mitchell try to help you at one time? Did you then turn on Mitchell and accuse him of murder? A sane person would have figured out that by now the BPD has completed and investigation into your fantasy murder allegations. Has Mitchell been arrested for murder? If Mitchell has not been arrested for murder, then stop with your slanderous and libelous allegations. Why is it necessary for your continuous and unrelenting character assassinations?
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Do you have to think of the bullshit you spew or does it just come to you naturally? Oh, if there were only a pooper scooper law for the internet. Then we could scoop up the crap you spew, put it on the compost heap then spread it in the spring.
Kelley, the only thing the IRS, FBI, or any other agency will ever share with you is space on this earth—and perhaps they’re unhappy about sharing that much with you!
Phil Spector doesn’t care a wit what others think of you. Most likely, you’re just providing entertainment—comic relief. The IRS staff reads your emails for entertainment purposes only. No one has to undermine your credibility, Kelley. Congratulations, you’ve done that all by yourself.
Kelley, all your internet postings and emails indicate just one thing—your descent into utter madness and insanity. You foolishly, foolishly think your story will be a “Hollywood Blockbuster”. How much more embarrassment must you family endure? It’s unfortunate not one person cares about you enough or loves you enough to see to it you get professional help: but even family members have a breaking point.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 3:13 am
Wanna bet her reason for leaving the US is cuz she and her “precious evidence” are no longer safe here. That’s right, Kelley, you’re going to save the US from Leonard
Cohen and his fans.
As for the rest of us, we can only hope when she tries to re-enter the US her name pops up on some homeland security screen—and she’s held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI. While I’m not a fan of the Patriot Act, hopefully uncle sam will just make her disappear so she can’t be a threat to anyone.
Kelley, why do we never see your “Holiness” (and I do mean that respectfully) teacher/friends rsponses to you email? Have they ever replied? I wonder, cuz you just can’t help yourself and you know you’d have to post them.
To my fellow posters, Happy Thanksgiving!
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:41 am
Ok, Kelley, what’s the real reason you left the USA? Too much pressure?
Do you think any of us are suprised you turned on Agent Sopko? Just out of curiosity, are you related to former Sen Joseph McCarthy? He had an enemies list, too. You should google his name and find out how well his evilness worked for him.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:49 am
And what the hell does Junior Gotti have to do with Leonard Cohen? How dare you slur Italian Americans. You should be ashamed of yourself; however, you’re a sociopath and sociopaths don’t have the ability to experience shame.
Kelly Green Says:
November 26th, 2009 at 1:20 am
Good God, Kelley. If you thought I was threatening you with cops with flashlights you’re more insane and hopeless than even I thought possible.
Someones been watching too much “In Plain Sight” if she thinks the feds will enroll her in the witness protection program. Hmm, perhaps all we can do is hope. Remember the first rule in witness protection is you give up all your prior life: all your contacts, your family, co-workers, advisors, enemies. You’re expected to get a job and be a sane, rational, and productive member of society. Most likely those you’d have to give up would be extatic. You’d just go away—never to be heard from again. Damn, perhaps we should petition the feds to get you in witness protection. Imagine an internet free of Kelley Lynch! One more thing. Care to guess how many 5150 patients claim to be in the witness protection program and how many demand the gov’t put them in witness protection?
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?
There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:16 am
Well, Kelley, Spector’s forensic science was laughable. Neither jury bought into it. It really is time for you to let go of PS1. It was a hung jury—and Spector remained free for an extra year. It’s outrageous of you to speculate that the jurors from either trial (specifically juror #9 from PS1) were perusing the internet while serving jury duty. If you had the tiniest speck of eveidence to prove that true, you would have posted it on some website—you wouldn’t be able to help yourself.
Make no mistake, I have neither slandered or trashed you. Your actions speak for themselves.
You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.
Kelly Green Says:
Nvember 25th, 2009 at 5:01 am
Well, if you didn’t see Diane Ogden’s testimony ( in person or on tv), how could she appear “to be high, delusional, and confused?” You report “she did die of a drug overdose so she could very well have been high on the witness stand.” Sure she was.
Cohen doesn’t have to provide you with a forensic accounting, proper or otherwise. You don’t work for him anymore. You stole everything of his you could get your hands on; and yet, he’s never had you arrested for anything. Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 4:20 am
Regarding evidence being turned over in a timely manner: It’s called the statute of limitations. In regards to criminal matters, and with the exception of murder, the gov’t can only prosecute a crime within somany years after the crime ocurred; in regards to civil torts, a plaintiff can only sue a defendant within so many years - intentional tort (generally 2 years tho sometimes 3 years). Because all the things you want to litigate were intentional torts, the 2 year period has expired; therefore, you will be unable to sue anyone.
Regarding Diane Ogden, I never said she seemed normal; I said she didn’t appear high or delusional.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:59 am
I’ve never watch CSI and since watching old re-runs of CAR 54, I haven’t watched cop shows. And I’m no fan of cops.
It’s fascinating you report in regards to questions about Spector: “Actually I didn’t say anything.” So you’re saying you NEVER said anything to the cops about Spector while you were enroute to “Killer King”? Well, if you didn’t say anything about Spector, how could you be a potential witness at his trial?
Next time you encounter a cop, firefighter or EMT, ask them when was the last time they engaged a 5150 patient in conversation. You’ll hear groans and chuckles.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:43 am
Whether or not Lana Clarkson took perscription vicodin did not endanger Spector’s life—the gun HE foolishly kept in a drawer endangered Lana Clarkson’s life—he killed her.
What gives you the authority to decide if Diane Ogden looked high or was delusional while testifying? Neither of us was present in the courtroom; although I did watch her testimony on tv and she neither appeared high or delusional.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:33 am
First, I am a sane and rational woman—and you know nothing about sane and rational logic and behavior; therefore, if you want to apply rationale, apply your own twisted logic. You do not speak for me.
Now that I think about, you DONOT have evidence. You may report you have documents, but evidence needs to be given to law enforcers in a timely manner: 5 years is not
timely. Well, I’m sure Cohen will be grateful you’ve held his documents in your son’s storgage unit (is there no one you won’t sell-out? Your own son). Everyday you keep the precious documents and don’t turn them over to the feds is another day Cohen gets away with the tax fraud you were told was criminal.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 3:20 am
The time has come to officially throw the bullshit flag regarding your trip to “Killer King”.
Let’s review the reasons for the excursion: while you knew your home was surround by SWAT, you decided to exit your home while dressed in a bikini (and escorting your dog); when you were ordered to stop, you jumped into your swimming pool. It’s fortunate neither you nor your dog were shot. Your actions, and your actions alone, caused your committed time out at “Killer King”. I understand the conditions at “Killer King” were deplorable; however, the conditions at “Killer King” didn’t cause your committment—your actions did.
Now here’s where the bullshit flag gets thrown. I’ve got a great life, and I’ve always had the means so I could do anything I wanted. I had the luxury of working as a career ‘medic for 20 years. In those 20 years, I transported at least a thousand 5150 patients. Do you still maintain the cops grilled you for information on Phil Spector? Kelley, no public safety official ever engages a 5150 patient in a conversation. We don’t have to. See every 5150 patient has something to offer—in order to avoid the committment they will say anything. The cops didn’t grill you about Spector—you offered the Spector information because you thought it would get you out of a stay at “Killer King”. You tried to “trade up”. In other words, Kelley, you foolishly thought your info would get you a free pass.
How did that work for you?
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 2:54 am
Becareful what you wish for, Kelley.
Let’s pretend there was criminal tax fraud. Who’s going to jail? The guy who may have committed tax fraud or the woman withholding evidence? The woman who vows to soon begin reviewing more evidence? The woman who’s mastered cut and paste? The woman who’ll turn over evidence if and when she wants to?
What sort of trouble could that woman be facing? Criminal obstruction of justice. You see, Kelley, your foolish and childish actions have assured Cohen will walk away without paying one thin dime. When Cohen walks away from this, it’ll be because of your actions—you had to squirrel away all the “precious evidence”—everything that could prove he’s guilty. And then the only one who could possibly be facing charges is you: criminal obstruction of justice. (I hear the federal prison system has “fabulous” mental health facilities.) If you’re really lucky maybe you can get into camp cupcake.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 2:39 am
Kelley, you attack others and demand to know why others are speaking for the IRS, FBI, judges, etc. Why do you speak for Phil Spector and his lawyers? Why do you speak for Steven Segal, Oliver Stone, and Ron Burkle?
Just how is Spector “being unduly prejudiced and discriminated against” if DeSouza isn’t deported? And just how has the DA “exposed Immigration to extremely serious legal liability”?
In many of your rants, you go on and on and on insisting the DEA investigate, well, just about anyone who’s ever said anything you didn’t like. Sure, we’re all on drugs. Oh wait—didn’t you demand the DEA investigate your doctors when they would NOT give you drugs? Given your record for invoking the name of the DEA and demanding investigations, what medical professional in his/her right mind would give you anything stronger than an unmedicated bandaid?
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
OK, Kelley, we get it—reading comprehension is NOT your forte.
But I love this: Kelly Lynch/intellectual property—now that’s a classic oxymoron.
Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
“Gianelli, you’re not reading Alan Jackson’s mind again, are you?”
One does not require the ability to read minds to predict your future.
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
KELLEY LYNCH ASKS:
“How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me?”
1. With Kelley Lynch as the whistle blower, it s simply a matter of common sense.
2. The fact that over four years later no criminal charges have been filed (all the more so, with each and every passing day) also adds to our hypothesis.
3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.
Can you imagine dropping by this site and focusing in on Colleen Chaney as an issue?
Webber Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 12:06 pm
Colleen Chaney did not “respond” to Kelley Lynch’s email–except to blow her off.
See this KL email to Chaney agreeing to drop Chaney from KL’s spam email list:
“On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Chaney, Colleen (SOS) to me Hello Colleen, Thank you for the attached which I am sharing with Mr. Weinberg, Mr. Riordan, the IRS, DOJ, Agent Sopko and others. I now understand why Leonard Cohen, Richard Westin, Neal Greenberg, and others, felt comfortable committing what I was told is criminal tax fraud and setting up sham entities, etc. On the fact of it, from my perspective, it looks as though many people should be in prison. I’ll remove you from my emails. Someone in Kentucky is going to come up with answers. I don’t intend to spend the rest of my life contacting federael and state agencies. I’m beginning to wonder why we actually have them. Thank you,Kelley Lynch”
Kelley, your nose is growing, again.
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:14 am
Are you asking us to believe the cops have your low-jacked? That cops have nothing better to do so they might as well find where Kelley is so they can bust/harrass somebody?
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:24 am
First, mug shots are part of a criminals record and those are considered open records—meaning if someone asks for them, the cops MUST provide them.
Second, I have never said and I will never say that the gov’t considers you a prominent witness—that’s your fantasy: not actuality.
Finally, you really want us to believe the Browne family and the Clarkson family want money. NO, they want their daughters back. Thanks to your good friend Phil Spector (who even you acknowledge you met only a few times) that will never happen. Just out of curiosity, if Drs. Lee and Baden were so crucial to Spector’s case, why didn’t they testify during the 2nd trial?
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:09 am
You’re not going to ever prosecute anyone in a criminal court. As big as your ego is and as deluded as you are, nothing will change that. You can huff, and puff, and try to blow down a courthouse, but no prosecuter will ever take you seriously. The best you can ever hope for is a civil trial—and during a civil trial the jury will laugh at you. Don’t you get it—no judge is ever going to allow you the opportunity to persue any type of trial. WTH, show up at a courthouse, demand to see a judge or prosecuter–in minutes you’ll be ordered held for a 5150 hearing.
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:01 am
Kelley, those with mug shots have a criminal history!
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 1:06 am
Just out of curiosity, Kelley, why didn’t your advisors report “Cohen’s taxfraudIwastoldwascriminal”?
Additionally, no one responding to your delusional and slanerdous postings is witness tampering or practicing witness intimidation. See, for us to be engaged in tampering and intimidation, we’d have to have a stake in the outcome. We don’t. No one in cyberspace is trying to silence you; however, you continue to bully us in hopes we’ll go away—how’s that working for you?
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 12:55 am
Talk about selective reasoning:
“The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.” (posted by Kelly PLZ)
Do you honestly believe Kelly PLZ said or implied that you’d be a “prominent government witness”? You think that’s a compliment? A recognition for all you’ve suffered? If you truly believe you’ll be a prominent witness in any criminal case brought by the gov’t, then you’re really delusional. No one has anything to fear if you’re going to be the “prominent witness” against them.
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 12:23 am
Well, well, well…call me suprised. You’ve failed to post all the emails from those I listed. Without a doubt, Kelley, you’ve got the best “selective” memory around—and it won’t hold you in good stead with the courts.
Kelley, you’re the LAST person on earth who should be questioning whether others engage in intoxicating or illegal substances; afterall, you’re the one with a CRIMINAL HISTORY of substance abuse and associated violent crimes.
Kelley–Give us a break Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
“Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids.” Huh?
Obviously, we have a different yard stick for rock bottom. (For me morphing into a homeless ranting nutcase would be the skids, especially if I formerly lived in a $3 million home with a pool in a nice part of Los Angeles, had two wonderful kids, was a business manager for a well known music figure, negotiated multi-million dollar deals, and made seven figures in a single year.
Perhaps I can put it in terms that you might understand: Compared to Leonard Cohen you are a dung beetle.
You have constructed quite a fantasy world for yourself Kelley.
Kelly PLZ Face Reality Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Dear Psycho:
What you can’t seem to get in your head is that the binding effect of the CA $7.9 million theft judgment against you is that all claims that Cohen had, and that you had but failed to assert as a cross-complaint, that arise out of your former business relationship have been conclusively adjudicated.
That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.
You denying that Cohen was the victim of your wrongdoing is like OJ denying, in the face of the $40 million judgment to the contrary, that he killed his ex-wife.
It’s over, Psycho. You lost. Get over it.
Cohen landed on his feet and his career is bigger and better than ever.
You hit the skids, are homeless and are mentally disturbed, and psycho with nothing, because unlike Cohen and despite your extraordinary human potential even after 5 years you have been unable to pivot away from your adversity and move on to positive endeavors.
You are pathetic and mean spirited and we ALL wish you would just crawl into a hole and disappear, because you have nothing positive or constructive to offer–only negative, harmful energy.
I do feel sorry for your sons, sister, mother and other relatives whom you have publicly shamed by revealing your familial connection to them but not for you.
Everybody knows everyone on you email spam list laughs or cringes or both when their inbox starts filling up with your latest rants about Suzanne Walsh or Kelley Green or this blogger or that person. But they do not care about you and never will. You have become a caricature of your self.
Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.
Therefore, the biggest joke of all is that joke that you have played on yourself through your constant self-negitive publicity machine.
Likewise, who would want to hire a business manager or even an assistant with a history of turning just about everyone you get mad at (including a former employer) into the IRS and every law enforcment agency that will listen–not to mention an adjudicated thief and self deluded psycho.
Kelly Green Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Sydney and Susanne, you are so right. Lynch is always the victim. However, her family doesn’t see her as a victim; in fact, they’re communicating with the “terrorists”. And never once has Lynch received any kind of support or encouragement from anyone. She’d have to post it on her blog. She can’t help herself. As a matter of fact, we know the only people she’s heard from are Bill Pavlic, Bill Frayeh, Gianelli, Alan Jackson, and Colleen Chenney—and each one has asked her to remove them from her mailing list. And as her past history indicates, she has or will become viscious toward each one. They, too, are now “thugs”. They’ve told her to stop spamming them. Whenever she does get a response she posts it—she can’t help herself. All we “insane thugs” need to see that others have responded to her (thus feeding her immense ego). In regards to an email she spammed to AC360, she received a standard response from the show—and ever since she’s deluded herself into thinking he believes and supports her and her lies. It’s time to be honest: Kelley Lynch and the truth are not accquainted—they don’t even reside on the same planet. Lynch has not a single supporter.
Now, we know how Lynch will respond to this: we don’t know what we’re talking about, yada yada yada.
At one time, Lynch insisted Boies Schiller told her she had at least a $20M claim against Cohen. Yeah, right. Sure they said that. Not even B/S could afford to walk away from that settlement. Now if B/S did truthfully tell Lynch of that claim, there must have been a string attached. Of course, B/S would require Lynch to be clean, sane, and sober. Yet, not even the prospect of $20M is enough for Lynch to get (and stay) clean, sane, and sober. Afterall, B/S would require daily drug tests and proof of psych treatment. Is it really any wonder that her family is doing nothing to help her?
Kelly Green Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:09 am
Who in her right mind routinely signs correspondence to lawyers she’s never met “love”?
Ah, Lynch’s cyberterrorism continues. Where to begin…let’s see, at least twice you’ve instructed Phawker to save my IP address–let all in cyberspace know how those subpoenas are coming. Since you are living in a shelter, you can’t begin to pay for the subpoena service you’re going to need. I PROMISE you, if I’m served a subpoena I will report to court (thou you will, by law, have to pay for my travel and lodging) and MY ATTORNEY WILL IMMEDIATELY ASK THE JUDGE TO ORDER YOU TO SUBMIT TO A 5150 HEARING. ANY THE JUDGE WILL GRANT MY REQUEST–and your website will be all the proof I need. Apparently, none of you family or friends care enough about you to force you to get psych help–so I guess I, A TOTAL STRANGER, will be the one person to force the issue.
You’ve recently made reference to the need to subpeona a communiqe between you sister and Gianelli. It’s interesting that your family is now reaching out to those you claim terrorize them. As ususal, you are the only person who is a threat to your family.
On your webite you’ve gone to great pains to tell everyone that you want your family and the Feds to testify via telephone. Why don’t you want your family in the courtroom with you? Most families make a point of attending–you know they make sure you get your hair done and get you a new dress–inotherwords, they go out of their way to make their loved one is cleaned up so they appear credible. Again, why don’t you want them at your side?
I’m sure it won’t be long before, once again, Google shuts down you website. Perhaps Blogonaut will report you for theft. Once again, you have stolen from Blogonaut–and thanks to your links, this time, without any doubt, you’ve made a deliberate attempt to hijack his website. You seem to think that as long as you cite the source, it’s ok to steal things from other website and post that material on your sites. Well it’s not ok. It’s not ok to steal from Blogonaut; it’s not ok to steal from Phawker; and it’s not ok to steal from The New York Times. You’ve committed theft–copywrite infringement–theft of copywrited material. You have a narcissistic need for others to respond to you; however, you don’t have the guts or courage to open you websites to comments. You have a need to engage others but you don’t have the guts to do it on your turf.
How does that old adage go, “Once a thief….”
Kelly Green Says:
November 22nd, 2009 at 7:23 pm
I have questioned your sanity; however, I never believed you to be stupid. I was wrong.
It’s time for you to take other posters seriously. It’s time for you to be concerned about your family–think about how much your actions are going to cost them. Can they afford to pay for your actions?
Kelly Green Says:
November 22nd, 2009 at 2:23 am
Bravo to Mr. Gianelli and Blogonaut! Finally someone is putting the skids to this cyberterrorist. Since she always threatens to, someday, sue most of us and she spams most of those she intends to sue, could her email bullying be construed as witness intimidation? Oh, well, I’m sure until she reaches her next destination, she’ll be quiet—she has a pattern of fleeing to other locations and re-establishing her cyberterrorism.
I know the holidays are approaching. However, I’m truly, truly saddened that, as of yet, no one in her life cares about her enough or loves her enough to get her psychiatric help. From experience, I know it’s neither easy nor pleasant to insist a loved one get psychiatric care—but it must be done. I sure Kelley’s family would prefer to be involved in anything but this situation. Joan, Karen, David, and Rutger it’s now time for you to step-up and commence the actions that will ensure Kelley gets the help she so desperately needs. It won’t be easy (perhaps the SOH will assist you) but you and everyone in cyberspace know it must be done. If you are unable to do so, perhaps once she settles in her next location total strangers will step-up-to-the-plate and begin Chapter 51 proceedings (5150). Clearly, the time has come for you to insist Kelley get professional help.
Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
November 20th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
To cut to the chase:
1. Kelley Lynch ha already sent over 400 emails to the IRS, the Justice Department, state attorney’s general, local DA’s, Treasury Agent Kelley Sopko, governors, mayors, media outlets and a hundred other email recipients falsely accusing me of “cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation”, and other serious felony crimes.
2. She started doing this because she hijacked a blog that I am counsel for, Blogonaut, posted 60+ items falsely accusing various persons of serious crimes (manufacturing meth, child molestation, tax fraud, and other crimes) and was then banned from the blog. I then addressed Kelley Lynch’s emails and attempted comments on the blog that she had apprised high profile attorney Bruce Cutler of the situation and had asked him to look into suing Blogonaut.
I sent Cutler a letter, he immediately phoned me, and we thereafter had several cordial telephone conversations wherein Cutler made it clear that he did not represent Lynch, he did not know Lynch, he had never even spoken to or written Lynch, but that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him 10 to 20 very long harassing voice messages for him EVERY DAY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, and that Mr. Cutler regarded Kelley Lynch as the “worst telephone stalker I have ever encountered”. Cutler also told me that Lynch had been sending him hundreds of very long (50+ page) unsolicited and ranting faxes daily for several months until his office complained to her then employer, who stopped the faxes from Lynch’s workplace.
3. Kelley Lynch cc’d Blogonaut with scores of emails to high profile security consultant to Phil Spector Bill Pavelic, including a very disturbing email wherein Lynch, in the conversational style of old, good friends, asked that he assemble a team of investigators to investigate me, several Cohen attorneys, and man other persons. I emailed Bill Pavelic who informed me that he had absolutely no association with Kelley Lynch “who is obviously a very disturbed woman”.
4. I emailed Treasury Agent Sopko, who called me back to advise that I should not be concerned with the scores of emails by Kelley Lynch to her demanding my arrest and prosecution because no reasonable person would regard Kelley Lynch as credible.
5. I have been in touch with an FBI agent who told me I had nothing to fear from Ms. Lynch’s many reports to the FBI because Lynch was a “classic 5150” (cop talk for nut job).
6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.
7. Kelley Lynch is a very sick and disturbed person, who in the past 48 hours has sent me and/or the blog I represent over 50 emails, several to her own family members (including her sister and son) cc to me, stating that her family members support her internet activities 100%, and that her eldest son (Rutger) is “eager” to join in a lawsuit against me, Blogonaut, and others. It is Lynch who involved her family in this very public slow motion meltdown hers, and not me or my client.
8. We were advised by the Treasury Department and the FBI to simply ignore Kelley Lynch, but enough is enough.
Personally, I have had it up to here, and will no longer remain silent about this internet and spam email bully—as mentally disturbed as she obviously is.
–Stephen R. Gianelli
415.929.5130
Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
November 19, 2009
Dear Kelley Lynch:
As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist slandering Blogonaut, this office, and any other persons affiliated with us, on the internet, including but not limited to your blogs, or otherwise.
If you fail to so desist, I will be suing you, David McCourt, Karen McCourt, Rutger Penick, and all other persons whom you have claimed to Blogonaut in writing have aided and encouraged you to pursue this course of action.
Please govern yourself accordingly.
By email, we are so informing David, Karen, and Rudger.
This office is well aware of your current whereabouts in California, and is fully prepared to sue you, Rutger, Karen and David forthwith, should you post a single additional disparaging comment about Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, including the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
Stephen R. Gianelli
PO Box 475013
San Francisco, California 94147
(415) 929-5130
CC; Karen McCourt, David McCourt, Rudger Penick
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
When you arrive in California late tomorrow to visit your son Rutger courtesy of a bus ticket provided by the Star of Hope and stop by to report us to your local police department please be sure to mention that you have outstanding warrants for your arrest and to give the nice officer the contact information for our attorney, Stephen R. Gianelli, who would be happy to fill the officer in on your activities and current legal status.
Please do mention your arrest record in Los Angeles, California and Bounder Colorado and how all of this is pursuant to a grand conspiracy against you because you have been “targeted” to discredit you as a witness to Leonard Cohen’s “tax fraud” that you reported five years ago (with no prosecution).
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
Novmber 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
PS: do not forget to mention to then nice officer your claim that you were “kidnapped” by the LAPD and taken to a psychiatric facility against your will (Killer King), your previously published belief that LA Swat was there to “murder” you to silence you, as well as your claim that the LAPD then falsified its report as well as the Killer King records in order to “discredit” you as a witness against Cohen—all aid the “set up” of Phil Spector on murder charges. Please do also mention that this is only one of two involuntary psychiatric commitments that you have suffered.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
“Witness tampering” is a legal term of art that excludes blog comments.
One can only wonder if KL’s life is in order, and she has the “full support” of her family in Texas, who she is leaving Texas for another state on the eve of the Thanksgiving and christmas Hollidays.
As for the “crimianl attorney” that Lynch is keeping apprised of this matter in connection with her desire to sue Cohen,–for that KL will need a civil litigation attorney, and moreover an attorney with the ability to trun back time to before Lynch’s statute of limitations to sue Cohen expired.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Kelley, anyone who has read your various twisted blogs knows that you will post anything resembling a reply from anyone, yet you have never posted any communications from Steven Segal, “Rinpoche”, Phil Spector, Oliver Stone, or any of your other “friends”. Nor has anyone on your spam email list ever replied to you except to ask that they be dropped from the list.
This is quite a fantasy life you have concocted for yourself, but you have long ago burned any bridges you had in Los Angeles, you have now fled from Boulder, and you now live in a homeless shelter–despite a mother and sister in the area.
And you have been threatening to obtain subpoenas and then to sue every anonymous blog commenter who has dared challenge your posted nonsense for years—but never have and never will. Indeed, you have not even brought action against the persons whose identities you already know (e.g., Cohen).
Who do you think you are fooling?
This really has moved from the bizarre to the pathetic.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
KL loves to post her emails to others and to drop the names of celebrities (Phil Spector, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone) but she has never posted a reply from ANY of these persons to a single email by her–including to her many emails to “Rinpoche”, who she describes as “Steven Segal’s friend and teacher”.
Are these letter from KL to others, famous and otherwise (that are never replied to), supposed to persuade the world that all of these people support her?
Because we all know different.
If KL’s blog posts are any guide, the closest KL has come to an actual reply from anyone except Maurice the homeless guy from Santa Monica is the auto reply she received following her (unanswered) email to Anderson Cooper–which computer generated auto reply KL posted on her blog like it was confirmation of something.
Of course, KL is free to prove all of us wrong by posting a recent reply from Phil Spector, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone, or even “Rinpoche”. But don’t hold your breath.
As with the opinion letters KL is awaiting from the IRS and the Kentucky Secretary of State it ain’t goanna happen.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
PS: Neither Doron Weinberg nor Dennis Riordan have ever replied to one of her hundreds of emails either. Yet she casually cc’s them like they were the best of friends (”all the best, Kelley”) when in fact none of these people give her the time of day.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
As far as I have been able to ascertain, the Kentucky Department of Revenue does not issue advisory tax opinions. If it did, the requesting party would have to be directly involved in an actual, current (prospective) tax situation. If the opinion then issued, the persons directly involved in that tax situation could then rely on the opinion going forward. And if it did, the opinion would be requested through tax professionals from the Kentucky Department of Revenue (not the Secretary of State).
Even where advisory tax opinions can be requested, the agency is under no obligation to issue one.
No taxing authority issues advisory opinions about the alleged past tax fraud of others concerning long defunct business entities. That is not what they are for.
Advisory tax opinions, when issued, are for the purpose of providing guidance to a tax payer who is facing a specific tax situation, going forward. They are not binding on the issuing agency but may protect a party who relies on it from the later assessment of penalties. They are not issued years after a transaction so an obsessed blogger can post them with an “I told you so” comment or about a celebrity’s tax matters to facilitate dogging that celebrity on the internet.
Therefore, if Kelley Lynch is waiting for a “tax opinion” from the State of Kentucky or the IRS regarding one or more Cohen related entities that no longer exist; it is going to be a longer wait than when she was waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler. Because it is NEVER going to happen.
And no KL, this does not mean that people can commit tax fraud. It just means that YOU cannot obtain tax opinions from the IRS or the Kentucky Department of Revenue regarding your allegations of past tax fraud.
That is all.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 11:44 am
Well said Kelly G. and Susanne W.
After 5 years of KL threatening to sue anyone who dares disagree with her, she has become quite boring.
I have no doubt that 5 years from now KL with still be ranting about being in the verge of suing Leonard Cohen and others just has she asserted in 2005 when Cohen first obtained his $7,000,000.00 judgment against her.
It is almost 2010–the 5 year anniversary of KL’s empty threat to sue Cohen and have him prosecuted by the IRS and others.
According to KL there is always something that needs to happen before KL actually files suit. For almost two years she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler”. Then she was waiting to hear from Spector’s legal team. Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)
Don’t go away mad KL, just go away.
Kelly Green Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:14 am
Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?
Now you’ve decided Blogonaut/Gianelli is attacking you on this blog. Let’s be real, Gianelli’s brave enough to use his actual name—he doesn’t have to hide behind a fictional identity. And you’ve sent how many emails to the IRS, FBI, etc, claiming he’s being “mean” to you. Once again, you have no proof it’s Gianelli. Nonetheless, you want the IRS, FBI, etc, investigating Gianelli because “another victim” said something you didn’t like; therefore, it must be Gianelli’s fault.
You continue to attack Lorca Cohen, yet your children remain off-limits. You also make reference to a draft article by Anne Diamond–please provide a citation for Diamond’s published article. You often refer readers to various incantations of your blogs where the reader can peruse Diamond’s article. The problem is that you’re the one who posts the article and the only person who can edit the article is you. One citation to Diamond’s published article, on a website other than yours or a web entry other than one of your many nics, will suffice.
You also make reference to attornies telling you Cohen exposed you to criminal tax fraud. Are you under investigation or criminal indictment by the IRS, FBI, DOJ, homeland security…? Do you intend to “flip” on Cohen for a lighter sentence? Or do you intend to plead guilty and accept the fines and serve a prison sentence? In other words, if Cohen doesn’t go to prison then, the odds are, neither will you. I’m sure somewhere in your mind you’ll twist this into a bribe; afterall, Kelley, everything’s a bribe to you.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 17th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Dear Ms. Lynch:
You have been threating to sue your “enimies” (including Cohen) since at least or May of 2005.
It is quite obvious that you are all show and no go.
You live in a homeless shelter, and not with your mother or sister who live close by in Texas.
It is also obvious from your writings that you are mired in the past and cannot move on.
Sue or don’t sue.
But until then, please STFU.
We all know that if your were going to sue Cohen or others you would have done so already.
No one cares about you any more.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 16th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Dear Ms. Lynch:
Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what you threaten to subpoena.
Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months t
November 29th, 2009 at 5:04 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 1:02:13 AM
Subject: No - where they are slandered, falsely accused, and targeted
To the IRS and FBI,
I have photocopies and want you to take custody of the documents immediately. The agents should bring cameras and videotape the change of command of custody of this evidence. I don’t think calling someone to the witness stand in order for them to “offer” their testimony based on scientific findings is a civil rights violation. I think targeting experts, slandering them, falsely accusing them of stealing evidence (as Dr. Lee has clearly stated in his email to the LA Times), and so forth and so on - is criminal. It also seems to be a civil rights violation.
I could care less about my pronoun usage right now. I’m dealing with an inordinate number of lunatics who have targeted me and intend to correct all grammar, spelling, and punctuation matters before these postings and emails go into legal documents. Scientific findings don’t have civil rights - not when Jackson’s on the case from what I can tell.
Kelly Green Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 3:50 am
OK, it’s late and I ‘m about to pack it in, then I came across this curious tidbit: “This jeopardizes the lives of innocent people, thereby violating their civil rights, in any and all future prosecutions where they are called to the witness stand to offer their testimony based on their scientific findings.”
Just WTF can Lynch be talking about? Other than Lana Clarkson, whose civil rights were violated? Scientific findings don’t have civil rights—do they? Can she possibly be talking about expert witnesses? How is an expert witness’ civil rights violated when he/she testifies? I don’t know that I posted that I have “original” documents but intend to review everything prior to litigating this matter - point by point, blow by blow, word by word.
This person, Kelly Green, is positively deranged.
The IRS and FBI should pay heed to the fact that prison has - again - been raised as an issue by Green.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 3:27 am
For months Lynch has proclaimed she has “original” documents that prove Cohen has defrauded the gov’t. Posters have reminded Lynch that she is under a court order to return those documents to Cohen. All of a sudden, she has only PHOTOCOPIES of the documents—she no longer has the originals. Lynch is a master of cut and paste (just look at any of her posts: she freely takes from other posters and then adds her comments, rinse, repeat, yada yada yada….)
Even though she has mastered cut and paste, she has yet to master pronoun reference: who ever knows to whom Lynch is referring? Should Lynch ever master pronoun reference, she could have a future composing for fantasy website and outlets. Kelley, you are a story-teller. Just a story-teller. Unfortunately, you are unable to separate fact from fantasy.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:22 am
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 1:19:34 AM
Subject: I Want To Know Alan Jackson, Clarkson, and Others Who Are Involved With Gianelli And These Other Bloggers Who Have Targeted Me
For the record, I am going to address any and legal remedies I have with respect to the fact that my children are exposed to this deranged insanity. I will also be addressing the damage this has done to my children, friends, and family members who have read or been exposed to these lies, malicious slander, and fraudulent allegations about providing evidence to the IRS carries a prison term.
When will the IRS and FBI be taking custody of the documents? If I reach Marvin Katz I’ll ask him about IRS policies.
Be clear about this, if the IRS and FBI does not immediately take control of this situation, take custody of these documents, and meet with me, Rutger, interview Ray for his protection, and speak to my family and Douglas Penick, I will litigate these issues. My money’s on the guy who committed criminal tax fraud. I also happen to know Phil Spector incredibly well and know precisely how he feels about Leonard Cohen.
Kelley Lynch
I will address some of these issues tomorrow and will, again, ask the IRS and FBI to take control of the situation as it relates to the threats against me, my family, and Douglas and take custody of the evidence that is clearly now a huge and crucial issue.
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 2:54 am
Becareful what you wish for, Kelley.
I hear the federal prison system has “fabulous” mental health facilities.
Kelly Green Says:
November 24th, 2009 at 3:14 am
Are you asking us to believe the cops have your low-jacked? That cops have nothing better to do so they might as well find where Kelley is so they can bust/harrass somebody?
Kelly Green Says:
November 25th, 2009 at 2:54 am
Be careful what you wish for, Kelley.
Let’s pretend there was criminal tax fraud. Who’s going to jail? The guy who may have committed tax fraud or the woman withholding evidence? The woman who vows to soon begin reviewing more evidence? The woman who’s mastered cut and paste?
The woman who’ll turn over evidence if and when she wants to?
What sort of trouble could that woman be facing? Criminal obstruction of justice. You see, Kelley, your foolish and childish actions have assured Cohen will walk away without paying one thin dime. When Cohen walks away from this, it’ll be because of your actions—you had to squirrel away all the “precious evidence”—everything that could prove he’s guilty. And then the only one who could possibly be facing charges is you: criminal obstruction of justice. (I hear the federal prison system has “fabulous” mental health facilities.) If you’re really lucky maybe you can get into camp cupcake.
——————————————————————————–
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 1:02:13 AM
Subject: No - where they are slandered, falsely accused, and targeted
To the IRS and FBI,
I have photocopies and want you to take custody of the documents immediately. The agents should bring cameras and videotape the change of command of custody of this evidence. I don’t think calling someone to the witness stand in order for them to “offer” their testimony based on scientific findings is a civil rights violation. I think targeting experts, slandering them, falsely accusing them of stealing evidence (as Dr. Lee has clearly stated in his email to the LA Times), and so forth and so on - is criminal. It also seems to be a civil rights violation.
I could care less about my pronoun usage right now. I’m dealing with an inordinate number of lunatics who have targeted me and intend to correct all grammar, spelling, and punctuation matters before these postings and emails go into legal documents. Scientific findings don’t have civil rights - not when Jackson’s on the case from what I can tell.
Kelly Green Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 3:50 am
OK, it’s late and I ‘m about to pack it in, then I came across this curious tidbit: “This jeopardizes the lives of innocent people, thereby violating their civil rights, in any and all future prosecutions where they are called to the witness stand to offer their testimony based on their scientific findings.”
Just WTF can Lynch be talking about? Other than Lana Clarkson, whose civil rights were violated? Scientific findings don’t have civil rights—do they? Can she possibly be talking about expert witnesses? How is an expert witness’ civil rights violated when he/she testifies? I don’t know that I posted that I have “original” documents but intend to review everything prior to litigating this matter - point by point, blow by blow, word by word.
This person, Kelly Green, is positively deranged.
The IRS and FBI should pay heed to the fact that prison has - again - been raised as an issue by Green.
Kelley Lynch
Kelly Green Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 3:27 am
For months Lynch has proclaimed she has “original” documents that prove Cohen has defrauded the gov’t. Posters have reminded Lynch that she is under a court order to return those documents to Cohen. All of a sudden, she has only PHOTOCOPIES of the documents—she no longer has the originals. Lynch is a master of cut and paste (just look at any of her posts: she freely takes from other posters and then adds her comments, rinse, repeat, yada yada yada….)
Even though she has mastered cut and paste, she has yet to master pronoun reference: who ever knows to whom Lynch is referring? Should Lynch ever master pronoun reference, she could have a future composing for fantasy website and outlets. Kelley, you are a story-teller. Just a story-teller. Unfortunately, you are unable to separate fact from fantasy.
November 29th, 2009 at 11:42 am
I can’t believe KL is still stalking and harassing everyone on the net. It is clearly she is a cyber-terrorist who is stalking blogonaut. It’s out of control. She had every blog of her shut down. She started another one http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/. Cyber-terrorist watch dog? Are you kidding me. You are the cyber-terrorist KL. That blog will be shut down too. Enough of you.
November 29th, 2009 at 11:47 am
KL is a pathological liar who stole money from Leonard Cohen. Pay the judgement thief, KL. You have been banned from every site and blogs you rant and raved on. Stop your lies. No one believes you. Oh and those libraries you post from will be told what you are up to. Your days of being a cyber-terrorist are coming to an end. You are in major violation.
November 29th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
We believe that KL is deliberately vague so she can exaggerate the importance of various events–like her alleged “dinner with” Phil Spector over 6 years ago (she does not claim any contact since).
For all we know she was at the same 500 person fundraiser or award dinner and was in the same banquet room as PS six years ago but not even at his table.
She implies that just she and Spector broke bread–but gives no details at all, and won’t even give the date. Instead, she emailed the IRS (and the usual spam list)–copy to us–and said that she is sure that Blogonaut knows when Lana Clarkson died; the “dinner” was shortly after that, so what is the mystery?
She refuses to say where this “dinner” was, what the occasion was, or how many others were there.
Another example is that she will claim she “spoke to” or “communicated with” a certain person, when what she means is that she sent him or her an email or left them a voice message.
If Lynch sends someone enough emails, even if they never respond, she regards that as a “relationship”, so “dear friend” takes on a new meaning.
She also claims to be “friends” with Oliver Stone and with Steven Segal.
November 29th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
I bet she never counts us as “friends” despite the multitude of emails sent and cc’d our way. I wonder how long it’s going to take her to figure out that no one - not the IRS, FBI, DOJ, attorneys, DA’s, governors, and now judges - will even respond to her much less deign to meet with her. Five years and she still doesn’t get it. Perhaps her latest target will be the exception and have her jailed for her activities. Harassment and terrorist threats are considered crimes, are they not Blogonaut? Of course, she will now jump on that and say that we are the ones harassing and threatening. Her lies are getting a little thin and transparent now as desperation begins to take over. It won’t take Judge Katz long to realize he’s been targeted. Perhaps he will be the one to put her away - one can only hope.
November 29th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut-Sydney (also on Blogonaut’s Blog about Phil Spector and me, etc.) - Let’s address your real concerns.
Who cares what you believe about my being vague or not. You do not know me and it is utterly irrelevant. I think it’s important when a man tells you Clarkson shot herself at his home and gives you details that are supported by the forensic science and experts. Why should I “claim” any contact after that date? Brian Bennet, DA’s Office, knows for a fact that Phil Spector and I were in touch after that date. What is your interest in this and what is your point?
Why are you “fishing” for more details relating to my dinner, in Beverly Hills, with Phil Spector after the Clarkson suicide? Cohen is aware that I saw Phillip. Contact his legal counsel, whom you - Gianelli-Blogonaut, have confirmed you communicated with and have him ask Cohen what details he recalls. He clearly understood at that time, and stated, that Phillip and I were friends.
I gave details. Phil Spector and I did not “break bread.” We had dinner and drinks and a delightful evening. He saw Rutger that night. What’s your point? I won’t even give the date. Why don’t you issue a subpoena and ask Phil Spector that question on the witness stand? The IRS might have noticed that you did know the date Clarkson died (the same day - a few years apart - that Rutger lost his fingers which is a ghastly coincidence). You posted that information. I don’t know if I “refuse” to say that. How would you know. You don’t know me and do not speak for me. What are you interested in now - who witnessed that idinner and who else heard what was being said? Phil Spector and I know.
I have no idea what you are talking about re. spoke to or communicated with issues. It’s vague and irrelevant. It is also overly broad and a sweeping generalization. Be specific - give me a name, date, posting time, website, and a quote.
You are receiving emails addressing your lies and malicious slander and attempts to intimidate and threaten me, my family and friends. That is why Nona Banks wrote that she views you as “lunatics.”
I wonder why Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory went into Steven Clark Lindsey’s office to discuss Cohen’s apparent view that I had sex with Oliver Stone? That seems incredibly perverted - to me - particularly as I had just gone to accountants and tax lawyers who confirmed that Cohen “exposed” me to criminal tax fraud and used me as an unwitting adviser. Oliver Stone and Steven Segal will receive subpoenas. Why are you bringing them up? Are you jealous and a Hollywood “wannabe?” Oliver Stone and I were students of His Holiness Kusum Lingpa. Steven Segal and I also had connections with various Tibetans. Does that bother you? I know - you’re obsessed with details of my life although I am a perfect stranger to you.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Correction: Cohen used me as an unwitting pawn although unwitting adviser works as well. The one he would use to take the fall in the event his tax planning and corporate structures drew the unwanted attention of astute IRS agents.
November 29th, 2009 at 4:56 pm
No, I don’t usually count people as friends that I view as terrorist con artists and liars - that includes the people Gianelli-Blogonaut stated he has been in touch with and refers to as my former friends. I have no former friends. I didn’t realize you were on my public emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud, Sydney? Our you posting under a fictitious name?
How can you speak for the IRS, FBI and/or DOJ. As Gianelli-Blogonaut has already spoken for Alan Jackson and Pat Dixon I’m assuming they have some understanding about those statements. Gianelli-Blogonaut ought to study, very carefully, criminal harassment and terrorist threats and/or threats directed at witnesses in a potential (pending) federal criminal prosecution, malicious slander, lies, etc. Every single slanderous allegation now has to be proven in court. That is impossible - for strangers who are lying about me and clearly have “motive.”
Why is Judge Marvin Katz going to be threatened by a phone call from a former employee? Do you know him? That seems absurd. I cannot imagine Marvin Katz (who I want to talk to about the threats being directed at my son Rutger - specifically) concluding that a phone call from a former employer meant that he was being targeted. I’ll let Marvin Katz know that there is tremendous talk about having me committed and using cops to target me. He was a former assistant to the IRS Commissioner and probably understands criminal conduct.
If the truth I am telling (you are lying) is getting thin - explain your obsession with me.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, since you have “silenced” me on your latest public Blog about me and Phil Spector would you like to explain your latest round of lies about me - and your interest in my whereabouts, Rutger, and Bill Pavelic. Bill Pavelic lives in Los Angeles. Bill Pavelic must be out of his mind if he wants to protect you in your attempts to terrorize and/or silence me, my family, and friends. I see most of the usual suspects - participating in an organized campaign of cyber-terrorism with respect to me - are all over your comment section. That’s precisely why you publicly stated you banned me. You lie, slander, maliciously gossip, and attempt to quash freedom of speech and the truth. Your Blog articles about me and comments are evidence of allegations I have repeatedly raised with you. You are aware of that fact. Therefore, evidence of what I believe is criminal conduct (potentially relating to a pending federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen or other matters) is not a copyright issue.
Kelley Lynch
Kelley Lynch
Post a Comment On: Blogonaut
“KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?”
26 Comments -
Anonymous said…
She’s harassing Alan Jackson.
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/2009/07/leonard_cohen_tickets_on_sale.php
November 27, 2009 12:41 PM
sanneka said…
Wonderful Blogonaut, you have been more patient and decent to this woman than anybody could reasonable expect.
Hopefully this blog will finalize Kelley Lynch’s hobby and career as a full time slanderer.
Susanne
November 27, 2009 12:15 PM
Anonymous said…
I’m shocked she is still around and hasn’t been put away. She is a danger to herself and others.
November 27, 2009 12:36 PM
Anonymous said…
Is this her blog again? How come she is able to start another one?
http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/
Isn’t KL the cyberterrorist?
November 27, 2009 12:54 PM
Sydney said…
Heh heh - I wonder how long it will take her to figure out no one is responding to her. If/when she does figure it out, and I’m sure she will eventually, I’ve decided not to directly comment on anything she writes. I will only comment directly to other posters. I’ve surely had my fill of reading what sounds very much like the lunatic ravings heard in lock-down wards of psych units. Hope everyone is enjoying the holiday season.
November 27, 2009 2:21 PM
Sydney said…
Yes, Anonymous 12:54, KL is definitely the cyber-terrorist - probably the worst one ever present. I am grateful that Blogonaut has pulled us away from her grips and gripes. And Sanneka, glad to see you here, too. Maybe if we all ignore her, she’ll go away and find other people to bother.
November 27, 2009 2:25 PM
Blogonaut said…
We appreciate your support, and participation here.
You might find this a “quieter” forum without all the “noise”.
BTW, Lynch wrote us on Thanksgiving to say she was not emailing this blog anymore but did 3 minutes later, and she said the same thing again today, but has since send us at least a half dozen emails.
Our attorney responded, via reply all, to an email quoting one of our Phawker posts as “admitting” that we had threatened KL.
We pointed out that communicating falsely with federal officials is potentially a felony offense, and in our opinion hundreds of false complaints to federal law enforcement that bloggers who simply disagree with her are guilty of “witness tampering” or “cyber-terrorism” qualify as false statements.
November 27, 2009 3:24 PM
Sydney said…
Blogonaut, if KL tries to post here on your site, will you post it or ignore her?
November 27, 2009 4:03 PM
Blogonaut said…
Kelley Lynch has been banned from posting on this site.
She has spewed (and continues to spew) quite enough hate and slander to the few internet outlets that she has left.
November 27, 2009 4:06 PM
Blogonaut said…
Here is Kl’s laters IRS mail received in our in-box just moments ago. (Of course, she cc’d it to here usual spam email list, including federal law enforcment, govenors, attorneys, media, and many others:
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
“What happens if these aren’t false allegations? Is there a downside for me then? See the obsessed wacked out nut’s latest bullshit below.
“Please send an IRS agent and FBI agent to mee me, Rutger, interview Ray, and to phone my parents, Karen, David, and Douglas. I don’t want to see a post like Sean Ogden’s in the future where my kids seem to have been pushed over the edge about this “fucking trial.” That’s why I would never in a million years want a reward. There is no money on earth that can address what is going on here.
“All the best,
Kelley”
November 27, 2009 4:40 PM
Sydney said…
She won’t accept a reward?? A REWARD??? For what? Setting a record for alienating more people on-line than anyone ever has before?? Thanks for the up-date; and also, thank you for not allowing free access to KL. I wonder how she’ll feed her psychosis now.
November 27, 2009 7:00 PM
Blogonaut said…
We think that she means she will not accept a reward from the IRS, but it is not explicit what she means.
November 27, 2009 8:17 PM
Anonymous said…
Kelley Lynch is now bragging on Phawker that she is going to contact a federal judge, who she says is a close friend:
“I am calling a friend of mine this week. His name is Marvin Katz and he is a federal judge in Philadelphia. I helped him settle his Mother’s estate when I was quite young and know him quite well.”
This could get interesting if she gets ahold of Judge Katz’s email address.
November 28, 2009 10:45 AM
Anonymous said…
Dear November 27, 2009 12:36 PM:
Unfortunately, her family humors and ignores her, so she is not even aware that she has a problem.
If things get difficult for her in one part of the country, she picks up and moves to another.
November 28, 2009 10:47 AM
Anonymous said…
Hon. Marvin Katz
Current: Judge, Federal DistrictCourt, Eastern District of Pennslyvania
Position:
Senior Judge, since August 26, 1997
Education:
Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, 1954
LL.B., Bachelor of Law
LR: Note and Comment Editor, Yale Law Journal
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1951
B.A., Bachelor of Arts
Affiliations:
Philadelphia Bar Association, Member
Pennsylvania Bar Association, Member
American Bar Association, Member
Past Positions:
Mesirov, Gelman, Jaffe, Cramer & Jamieson, Philadelphia, Counsel and Partner in Law, 1981 - 1983
Special Partner in Law, 1981
Internal Revenue Service, Assistant to the Commissioner, 1977 - 1981
Partner in Law, 1962 - 1977
Private Practice, 1954 - 1977
Hon. Francis X. McClanaghan, Court of Common Pleas, Law Clerk, 1959 - 1960
Associate in Law, 1954 - 1959
Fraternities/Sororities:
Phi Beta Kappa
Yes indeed, November 28, 2009 10:45AM, this could get interesting if she starts spamming Katz with her bizare nonsense.
November 28, 2009 11:02 AM
Blogonaut said…
Dear Kelley Lynch:
You have your chronology wrong.
We returned from Europe in May of 2009 and received an email from Leonard Cohen’s counsel bringing to our attention scores of posts by you on Blogonaut accusing Mr. Cohen of serious crimes without foundation.
We stated searching through our various PRO-Phil Spector posts your comments were posted on, and we discovered that you had hijacked our blog—meaning that the comments and discussions on our blog had become about you, your complaints, your problems, your life, and not the topic of the posts. None of the other commenters supported you, and this was on a very PRO-Spector website.
In addition, we also discovered that you were rude and threatening to other commenters and had slandered other named persons, including accusing one man of being a manufacturer of methamphetamine and accusing others of being child molesters. You had also threatened to have Bruce Cutler and the IRS “investigate” the true identities of the commenters posting on Blogonaut that took you to task.
We started searching for and deleting your posts but this proved too time consuming. We were required to delete entire blog posts (which were all highly favorable to Phillip Spector) to remove your scores of posts.
You then kept posting post after post.
We then had to enable comment moderation (which we had never done before) to prevent you from posting your slander in the future. (Sorry, but calling a person a “child molester” who has never been convicted as such on our blog is unacceptable.)
We posted a comment on the welcoming page of our blog informing our readers that “due to a persistent spammer, we were required to enable comment moderation”. You were not identified by name. (We experienced a sharp drop off in comments that persists to this day.)
You then sent us a dozen attempted posts threatening to sue us and also started posting libelous material about us on your two blogs, including the “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch” blog.
When our attorney was required to write to you, you then started libeling him by name on your two blogs—and we mean scores of posts.
You then started writing emails to the IRS, Justice Department, governors, police departments, prosecutors, media outlets, and scores of other persons cc’d accusing us and out attorney of obstruction of justice witness tampering, of being “gay”, and having a thing for Leonard Cohen, etc.
It was only then that we looked further into you and started drafting an investigative piece on who you are and what is your complaint against Leonard Cohen. We contacted you for comment on the piece and incorporated your comments into the piece.
See here: http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/06/leonard-cohen-harasser-undeterred-by-79.html
If you had not hijacked out blog and then refused to take no for an answer when you were banned, and then began disparaging us on your blogs, we would have never written a single word mentioning you by name on Blogonaut or any other site.
You hijack every discussion board, blog, and on-line forum that will accept your comments, the other commenters take you to task, and you respond with insults, reports to the IRS/Justice Department for “witness tampering” and threats of litigation.
The last comment thread you hijacked before Phawker was on the Hartford Currant. The thread became completely about you, and ultimately the administrators pulled the plug.
Get your chronology straight Kelley Lynch.
Your bannage from Blogonaut preceded the article about you and so did your slander campaign against this blog and our attorney.
You embroiled us in this slow motion and very public psychological meltdown of yours and if you had never hijacked our blog comments we would not even know you exist. You did this long before we wrote a single word about you.
November 28, 2009 2:42 PM
Sydney said…
Can’t wait to see what she says to Judge Katz. I do suspect if she does, she will only get away with it a few times before he takes action against her. And the beat goes on…
November 28, 2009 3:37 PM
kellygreen said…
As usual, I’m late for the party.
Well, this clears up everything. According to Lynch, she and Spector are in this together—sit down and brace yourselves for this—because “after all, Rutger lost his fingers the same day (a few years apart) that Clarkson shot herself at Spector’s house and their karma is clearly intertwined.” Yes, that clears up everything!
But how does Cohen fit into the equation? Oh, that’s right—it’s Cohen’s fault Rutger lost his fingers and it’s Cohen’s fault that Spector had a gun in his home.
November 28, 2009 3:35 PM
Blogonaut said…
Kelley Lynch has a strange pathology for sure + a freak show/train wreck quality that is at once arresting as it is horrifying.
Quite a piece of work.
November 28, 2009 5:03 PM
Sydney said…
And don’t forget kellygreen, it’s Cohen’s fault that she stole all that money from him. It’s also Cohen’s fault that she keeps getting banned from numerous blogs; also his fault she keeps getting arrested; his fault again that no one in the IRS and FBI responds to her displays of madness; and, once more, his fault she wanders from homeless shelter to homeless shelter. Wonder how long it’s been since she has lived in the real world?
November 28, 2009 4:05 PM
Anonymous said…
Where is KL posting from 24/7 if she is residing in homeless shelters?
November 29, 2009 7:25 AM
Anonymous said…
KL should rename her blog: Stalking Blogonaut. WTH! That whole disgusting blog is her trying to harass you along with everyone else. I just can’t believe no one has cut her off. She’s the cyber-terrorist, not a watch dog. I’m reporting her blog as much as I can to get it shut down.
November 29, 2009 7:55 AM
Anonymous said…
Thanks Sydney. I’m sure her blog will be shut down again. It’s just a matter of time.
November 29, 2009 7:15 AM
Anonymous said…
KL lied? Shock! not
November 29, 2009 7:18 AM
Blogonaut said…
November 29, 2009 7:25 AM:
Kelley Lynch recently copied us with separate emails to her son Rutger Penick and to her sister Kathy Lynch announcing she was leaving Houston with a bus ticket provided by her homeless shelter. (Houston apparently has a program to send its homeless to other locales if they can be “reunited” with a family member.)
As soon as we put 2 + 2 together, Lynch sent us an email denying “for the record” that she had left Houston—which sounded like she knew she goofed and revealed clues to her destination/whereabouts and was backpedaling.
Combined with Phawker comments that Lynch just now removed documents from her son Rutger’s storage room, and intended to meet with the IRS/FBI AND Rutger, our educated guess is that she is staying with her son in California—but we don’t really know.
Judging from the 24/7 posts it is clear that whoever Lynch is currently staying with is someone with an internet connection and that she is no longer blogging from a public library.
November 29, 2009 8:35 AM
Blogonaut said…
We have 32 fresh emails from KL in our inbox—all sent between 6:00 pm yesterday and 9:57 am this morning—so KL continues to bounce off of the walls.
Among other things, she has announced to the IRS that she is going to contact federal district court judge Marvin Katz—who she refers to as “Marvin”.
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
“I know Marvin and I am calling him this week. I cannot imagine Marvin Katz thinking this was frivolous or funny.
“All the best,
Kelley?
Lynch is also spamming high profile defense consultant Bill Pavelic again, grinding him for writing me that he has nothing to do with Lynch and stating what we all know (that KL is a disturbed woman) and is requesting that Pavelic drop by to talk to Rutger to see how stressed he is.
Therefore, it is now confirmed that Kelley Lynch is now living with her son Rutger Penick in Los Angeles. (No wonder Rutger is stressed! Yikes!)
Lynch also writes to the IRS and the FBI to say:
“[Blogonaut] is bringing the threat of “prison” to Rutger’s attention - intentionally and willfully. I want the IRS and FBI to collect the evidence in my possession. It is not in Rutger’s possession and these threats are escalating…. has targeted my family - and in particular Rutger. I want IRS and FBI agents to meet with me, Rutger, and to interview Ray immediately - for our safety. I want IRS and FBI agents to call my sister, her husband, and Douglas Penick. “
KL also writes to the IRS to deny that she is “harassing” Alan Jackson—CC (of course) to Alan Jackson!
November 29, 2009 10:27 AM
Leave your comment
https://free.megaproxy.com/go/_mp_framed?blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com
November 29th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
P.S. Ray the deranged comment that I am harassing Alan Jackson. Perhaps, as a govenment lawyer, he should have read the letter (you linked the comment to on Gianelli-Blogonaut) again and review the legal issues I’ve raised. I thought he was an up and coming prosecutor? Why, then, would he view deadly serious legal issues as harassment - including my letter to him (that’s the only thing I could find relating to Alan Jackson on the Nashville link). - other people see the issues. They also see that I have been targeted by lunatics and liars - quite a number who seem to have “motive” that they think they’re going to disguise as “copyright issues.”
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
I have been away for 24 hours and it took me one hour to just skim through the latest of Kelley Lynch’s rantings, mostly repeats.
It is interesting to see how Lynch, when she is confronted with a lie, she elegantly skates right through that , like when for months one of her favorite phrases was that “Blogonaut had offered to put her in touch with Leonard Cohen who would help her get her life and her children back, all she had to do was lie”, since she was confronted with that obvious lie, the phrase has not appeared-
Also the “fact” that she had all that evidence to nail Leonard Cohen on tax fraud is now “phot-copies” and what was the mentioning of the moving truck removing boxes that has now “vanished”? Did I misunderstand or is that the “evidence” that has “vanished”?.
Kelley Lynch has repeatedly announced that she has “reported” Leonard Cohen, Stephen Gianelly and I believe others inculding casual bloggers on various forums, to authorities for criminal conducts and want them to be investigated, arrested and put in prison, just for disagreeing with her, but a blogger who mentioned that her son who she herself(Lynch) stated was hiding personal documents belonging to Leonard Cohen, could possible be prosecuted and jailed for that offense, was accused of “threatening her son with jail”.
My very personal opinion of Kelley Lynch is that she suffers from a typical case of “jilted lovers syndrom”.
I believe that after the Cohen-DeMornay break up, Lynch’s greatest hope and wish was that she would be Cohen’s next and last “first lady”, when that did not happend and Cohen chose beautiful Anjani Thomas and started (in Lynch’s own words) lavishing expensive gifts on Anjani) Lynch got furious and decided to help herself to Cohen’s money. When Cohen then dumped Lynch, not only as his private (and maybe occasional sexual partner), but also as his bussiness partner, fired her and sued her, I think Lynch was publically humiliated and lost what was left of her probably already fragile mind, and she decieded to devote the rest of her life on destroying Cohen no matter what the price, she would destroy her parents, her friends, Cohen’s child and her own children to get revenge. She would, as Blogonaut stated, also involve Phil Spector and his family, and give the impression that she was a “dear” friend and that she was willing to “give her life to rescue Phil” and then in return hope he will show his appeciation by joning her in a suit to destroy Cohen.
Phil Spector may be released, but that will have nothing to do with Kelley Lynch or Leonard Cohen, or he may spend the rest of his life in jail, that will also have nothing to do with Lynch or Cohen.
In the past two years Leonard Cohen’s life has sky rocketed, he has performed all over the world with ravenous reviews, his respect and admiration has been documented by his “cult victim fans”, by royalty in England, Scandinavia Monaco and Spain, by musical colleagues like Lou Reed, Bruce Springstein, You-Two(Bono) and politicians like Hillary Clinton and Al Gore, but more importan by his friends and his children (including his alleged “abused) Daugther who have traveled with him on most of his extended tour. Cohen has also made more money than ever before in his career, and if he has ever had any issues with i.e. the IRS, there is no reason to believe that those issues have not been resolved a long time ago.
On the other hand Kelley Lynch’s life has spiraled downwards at a very scary speed. She has reduced herself to a homeless cyber-stalker and more important to a selfish and abusive mother.
Lynch has made several “threats” to write an “ugly and disgusting” book about Leonard Cohen. I suggest that Blogonaut or somebody else write a book describing the complete and total meltdown and self-destruction of Kelley Lynch.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; billpavelic@aol.com; Dale.Kelley@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 1:43:00 PM
Subject: Re: Gianelli-Jackson Are Copied In Here Because Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Maliciously Targeting Me And It Relates To The Phil Spector Matter, Cohen, et al.
To the IRS and FBI,
How long do you intend to let this go on? Is there some crime in my contacting a man I used to work for who happens to be a federal judge now? Yes, I called him Marvin. Why would a perfect stranger be interested in who I am contacting and my whereabouts? Does that make any common sense to you at all? How about the continued fixation on my whereabouts and Rutger who now continues to be referred to on Blogonaut’s Blog. I do not want my son targeted. Why is the IRS and FBI doing absolutely nothing about this.
As for Bill Pavelic, he’s copied in here and should address Gianelli-Blogonaut’s allegation. Am I “spamming” Bill Pavelic? Maybe Phil Spector would like to weigh in on this issue. Bill Pavelic’s name is being used by lunatics who are now targeting Rutger and have implied that my family could have accidents and/or that I could be targeted by cops and/or be committed. Bill Pavelic thinks that’s acceptable? Why would Pavelic write Blogonaut-Gianelli that I am a disturbed woman. That is a lie although this scenario is gravely disturbing. I can assure you, based on an email I received this morning, I am not the only individual who finds this gravely disturbing. How does my suggesting that Bill Pavelic, who apparently lives in Los Angeles, drop by to see how stressed Rutger is (his allegations about me are now being publicly tossed around by people who have targeted Rutger) conclude that I am in Los Angeles and what is this lunatic’s continued interest in my actions. He has already publicly lied that I was/am in Mexico.
The scenario with Alan Jackson is “cute” for Gianelli-Blogonaut. I can assure you it’s deadly serious for Phil Spector and me. The IRS and FBI can determine, independently of the malicious lies, whether I am harassing Alan Jackson - a preposterous notion. Am I also having “sexual fantasies” about him? No I am not. These men apparently think all women are whores. Perhaps they should take a good hard look in the mirror.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut said…
We have 32 fresh emails from KL in our inbox—all sent between 6:00 pm yesterday and 9:57 am this morning—so KL continues to bounce off of the walls.
Among other things, she has announced to the IRS that she is going to contact federal district court judge Marvin Katz—who she refers to as “Marvin”.
“To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
“I know Marvin and I am calling him this week. I cannot imagine Marvin Katz thinking this was frivolous or funny.
“All the best,
Kelley?
Lynch is also spamming high profile defense consultant Bill Pavelic again, grinding him for writing me that he has nothing to do with Lynch and stating what we all know (that KL is a disturbed woman) and is requesting that Pavelic drop by to talk to Rutger to see how stressed he is.
Therefore, it is now confirmed that Kelley Lynch is now living with her son Rutger Penick in Los Angeles. (No wonder Rutger is stressed! Yikes!)
Lynch also writes to the IRS and the FBI to say:
“[Blogonaut] is bringing the threat of “prison” to Rutger’s attention - intentionally and willfully. I want the IRS and FBI to collect the evidence in my possession. It is not in Rutger’s possession and these threats are escalating…. has targeted my family - and in particular Rutger. I want IRS and FBI agents to meet with me, Rutger, and to interview Ray immediately - for our safety. I want IRS and FBI agents to call my sister, her husband, and Douglas Penick. “
KL also writes to the IRS to deny that she is “harassing” Alan Jackson—CC (of course) to Alan Jackson!
November 29, 2009 10:27 AM
November 29th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
Lynch, if you don’t want strangers to comment on who you are writing to or on your children, then please stop announcing thir names on public blogs
November 29th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Oh, Susanne, she can’t help announcing her family and children’s names and email addresses on-line. Cohen is making her do it. Or is it Blogonaut? Or Alan Jackson? Or Bill Pavelic? Or Blogonaut? Or Stephen Gianelli? Or KellyGreen? Or you? Or me? I know one of these made her do it. She can’t possibly be personally responsible for anything going on in her life. She’s the victim, right? Everyone in the world is making her do all these things, right? She’s an innocent, right? Butter wouldn’t melt in her mouth, right? Poor dear Kelley. No one to turn to but folks on the internet who she doesn’t know and who only know about her what she has posted on numerous sites, including her own blogs. Gosh, such a poor, down-trodden victim. Don’t you all feel sorry for her? Anyone??? Guess not…
November 29th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
I see you remain fixated, Walsh. Most people who are not wouldn’t spend an hour (probably more) to skim through all the latest of my postings. They are not mostly repeats - unless I’m addressing redundant garbage lies and/or malicious gossip.
Gianelli-Blogonaut did offer to put me in touch with Cohen. I will not paraphrase that exact quote he posted on his Blog but it contained references to Cohen being willing to help me. Unless Gianelli-Blogonaut posts that thread of comments there is no need to speculate. The comments were captured by me.
How would you understand anything about evidence, Walsh? I see Cohen’s extremely upset about the evidence the IRS has. Nothing, unfortunately, for him vanished - except perhaps some documents (including mine) illegally seized by the LA Sheriff’s Department.
Who precisely would possibly prosecute Rutger? Cohen’s not a prosecutor, is he? The IRS wouldn’t prosecute Rutger in order to sabotage their own possibly pending future criminal prosecution of Cohen, would they? So who has the power and motive to target an innocent young man, who has been through an unbelievable ordeal, with the power to criminally prosecute someone - apparently in California? Would that be the Los Angeles District Attorney or the Attorney General of California? Is there a matter pending before them? Then they shouldn’t witness intimidate, retaliate, or threaten them. Be clear about this, Walsh - my son was threatened with prison. There is a difference between prison and jail.
My personal opinion of you is that you wish you had been Cohen’s lover and you’re jealous. That doesn’t necessarily explain your obsession with me, Phil Spector,
and Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud Matter. I won’t even address the DeMornay Thomas trash - it sounds like something out of a perverted romance novel.
You sure have a lot of thoughts on someone you don’t know - me. Leonard Cohen, Steven Clark Lindsey, and others destroyed my life and targeted my famil. Period. Cohen, from my perspective, destroyed himself - with his greed, disdain for ordinary income and gift taxes, elaborate corporate structures, the allegations
raised by Freda Guttman about his daughter - I notice Cohen’s not targeting Freda Guttman which is quite bizarre, and his good rock ‘n roll comments about Phil Spector. He probably wouldn’t have had a career otherwise - I noticed, repeatedly, that the journalists wanted to talk about Phil Spector and I know Cohen likes to carefully craft and embellish his “stories.”
Yes, someone who knows both of us (to some degree), witnessed Cohen bad-mouthing Suzanne Vega behind her back (and found that shocking apparently - and wondered why Vega would be touting him as a brilliant artist after listening to him), commented that Cohen’s being feted by the press and I ended up with my life destroyed in a homeless shelter. She understands artists, artist management, publishing, administering publishing, and his motive from what I can tell.
I guess the tax fraud I brought to the attention of the IRS in 2005 was resolved long ago and they didn’t bother mentioning it to me or informing me that their case was closed.
I have not threatened to write a book. I have begun writing a book on Leonard Cohen. I have never stated it would be “ugly and disgusting” so why are you quoting me? If it’s ugly and disgusting that’s because it’s about Cohen and that’s how I view him and the fact that he has destroyed my life, targeted my children, and may have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s matter. Either he testified or he didn’t. When someone figures it out and can testify to that - post the comment here and the transcript. I suggest Gianelli-Blogonaut find an attorney to represent him because I am convinced he has engaged in criminal conduct - including lying to FBI Agent Wynar who has a lot of nerve slandering me, a perfect stranger, and exposing that insanity to my family and friends - since Gianelli-Blogonaut’s flaunting his comments on the public worldwide iweb.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 2:21:17 PM
Subject: Re: Gianelli-Jackson Are Copied In Here Because Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Maliciously Targeting Me And It Relates To The Phil Spector Matter, Cohen, et al.
For the record. The IRS and FBI should determine when I became a public figure and why I have been forced to comment publicly.
Kelley Lynch
For the record:
Susanne Walsh Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
Lynch, if you don’t want strangers to comment on who you are writing to or on your children, then please stop announcing thir names on public blogs
Sydney Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Oh, Susanne, she can’t help announcing her family and children’s names and email addresses on-line. Cohen is making her do it. Or is it Blogonaut? Or Alan Jackson? Or Bill Pavelic? Or Blogonaut? Or Stephen Gianelli? Or KellyGreen? Or you? Or me? I know one of these made her do it. She can’t possibly be personally responsible for anything going on in her life. She’s the victim, right? Everyone in the world is making her do all these things, right? She’s an innocent, right? Butter wouldn’t melt in her mouth, right? Poor dear Kelley. No one to turn to but folks on the internet who she doesn’t know and who only know about her what she has posted on numerous sites, including her own blogs. Gosh, such a poor, down-trodden victim. Don’t you all feel sorry for her? Anyone??? Guess not…
November 29th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
More Deranged Posts From The Cyber-Terrorists - Re. Former President Bill Clinton and Ron Burkle
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
date Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:44 PM
subject More Deranged Posts From The Cyber-Terrorists - Re. Former President Bill Clinton and Ron Burkle
To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the FBI,
This email addresses the latest round of Kelly Green’s on Phawker.com. I wanted to touch on the issue with former President Clinton and Ron Burkle in particular. This story is vulgar.
I attempted to drag Ron Burkle’s friend (former President of the Unites Bill Clinton) into this. That is a lie. Former President Bill Clinton has nothing, whatsoever, to do with this situation - although I realize his relationship with Ron Burkle is frequently a point of interest for the news media. Green’s a liar - it’s not “priceless” - Green’s completely transparent from my perspective. For the record, I have never stated that I know former President Clinton. I do not. I have never stated that I have an established relationship with a “Clinton” employee who foolish sent photos. I do not know and have never met, knowingly, any of former President Clinton’s employees. And no employee sent me photographs. Green’s a liar and has embellished a story and twisted facts. I have no idea if Cohen knows former President Clinton. Maybe his pal Al Gore introduced them.
Right, the U.S. federal government - according to Green - is wasting tax dollars so you can indulge me in my fantasies which hopefully do not include non-existent sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon and Alan Jackson. Lindsey shouldn’t have started his fraudulent/perjured custody matter and dragged Ron Burkle, Dr. Dre, and others into this situation. The entire custody file - including the ex parte hearing that may have details re. the King Drew/Phil Spector scenario from May 25, 2005, will be handed over to the IRS, the DOJ, the Treasury, the FBI, and Phil Spector via his attorneys. When Ray is 18 he will receive the entire file on his birthday. He will then know for a fact that his father is a fraud liar who destroyed his life using Robert Kory’s Declaration (coercion) and Superfon’s lies. In the meantime, the federal government and Phil Spector’s attorneys should feel free to use whatever they feel is relevant in that file and simply redact information that could potentially embarrass my son. His father should have thought about that prior to inserting himself into Cohen’s tax fraud matter and the Phil Spector murder trial that I view as a set up.
To the IRS/FBI - Green is yet again raising issues about forcing me to attend a Chapter 51 hearing (1051) and be forced into treatment. Does Green work for the KGB. I’ve already established that she’s a liar. What does it mean “before you push a federal agency too far?” From my perspective, that would be Green, Gianelli-Blogonaut, and others who have targeted me and my family.
Agent Wynar/FBI told Kelly Green that he no longer believes the crap. Does Green know Agent Wynar? It writes as if it does. I have no idea, as I’ve said, who the rogue agent is or what that means. Is the IRS and/or FBI aware of any rogue agents in their midst? You might want to double check.
Kelly Green hopes I call my good friend. Why? Why does Kelly Green care who I call? Why would Marvin Katz view my voice messages or our conversation as receiving lunatic messages from me? Any thoughts on that matter - stated, clearly, for the record by Kelly Green. Marvin Katz will then call upon ALL his available resources and begin the process to get me the psychiatric help I need. This is a nearly direct quote publicly stated by Kelly Green about me, a perfect stranger, and Marvin Katz.
I have never accused Gianelli-Blogonaut of murder.
Green apparently studied the romance dictionary and now writes fancifully.
The masculine female is going to “pack it in.”
Kelley Lynch
http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-214598
November 29th, 2009 at 7:10 pm
Oh, KellyGreen, now you’ve done it. She’s reporting you to the IRS and the FBI. Are you shaking in your boots yet? No? Why not girl? They’re going to come and take you away based on Kelley Lynch’s word in yet another maniac rant! Are you sure you’re not shaking? No? Good.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
“Reporting” Green to the IRS and FBI or documenting - for the IRS and FBI - the lies and malicious gossip on this and other Blogs about me. I remain unconvinced, at this time, that Green is a woman. No one ever asked the IRS and FBI or anyone else to come and take Kelly Green away. I personally feel they should review her posts, determine why she has written these posts - many of which contain veiled and not so veiled threats, were her affiliation with Gianelli-Blogonaut (and other posters and/or parties involved in the matters being addressed here) in order to determine whether or not she and/or other parties should be investigated and/or prosecuted in what appears to be an organized campaign of cyber-terrorism meant to silence me and undermine as a potential witness in a possible/pending federal criminal prosecution or prosecutions. You yourselves continue to refer to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Agent Sopko, and Agent Wynar.
For the most part, Sydney - as usual, your rant is irrelevant and gratuitous. Clearly that is my opinion. You probably think you’re being cute.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Nah, I don’t think I’m cute. I know I am. But that’s beside the point. Kelly Lynch is a non-stop source for idiocy, insanity, delusion, sociopathy, child abuse, elder abuse (her poor mother must be so mortified by her behavior), stalking, harassment of public officials, slander, libel - umm does that about cover it? Probably not, but it will do for now.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
You ask what the “affiliation” among commenters in this site (other than you) is?
There is an old Arab proverb: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
As we told someone in September of 2009:
“There is an old Arab proverb: The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Thanks to Kelley Lynch I now have a lot of new ‘friends’ :).”
November 29th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
Vulgar, crass, and mindless might apply as well. Why are you, a person dead set on maliciously gossiping and lying about me, beside the point. I’ll just document the rest of your lies and lunacy for the record. I don’t see any reason to engage in utterly mindless banter. I am monitoring this Blog for malicious gossip and lies - after allm my family has been targeted and (from my perspective) accidents have been raised as a possibility.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ? ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
dbergman@bergman-law.com,
“Hoffman, Rand” ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com
date Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 4:26 PM
subject Re: Addressing Malicious Lies and Slander, Etc. on Phawker, Blogonaut
To the IRS Commisisoner’s Staff and the FBI,
Do you understand how “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” applies to Gianelli-Blogonaut’s lies, slander, malicious gossip, targeting of my family, and so forth and so on? I think this post is meant to deflect away from the issues I view as criminal and serve as a red herring - as in “who was he talking to in September 2009?” Then again, it might be worth looking into. Hard to say - why speculate?
In any event, it’s an irrelevant post so I’m just documenting it for the record.
ALl the best,
Kelley
November 29th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
Visit Paul Huebl’s Crime, Guns, and Videotape. Great articles on Phil Spector and his matters. I believe the DA has been all over that site - can’t testify to that, however.
http://www.crimefilenews.com/search?q=phil+spector
November 29th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Kelley Says: Dear IRS “it’s an irrelevant post so I’m just documenting it for the record.”
You are documenting “irrelevancies” for the record by sending emails to the United States Government?
In any event, the “association” among those you attack is easily understandable and a matter of common sense, since we all have a common foe—you.
As Danny Glover’s character said in the movie Silverado: “[Ms. Lynch], you have a lot to learn about human nature”.
If you go after people, threaten to report them to the IRS or the FBI or to have them investigated or prosecuted or threaten to sue them, or slander them—let alone do all of the above in scores (in some cases hundreds) of emails—the objects of your animus are a. going to consider you an enemy and b. feel a certain simpatico with those who feel similarly victimized.
Beyond that, your whole shtick is so objectively over-the-top offensive, irrational and exasperating that it is only natural that a consensus against your point of view will (and always does) develop on every internet forum on which you post and ever will post—whether it is the Hartford Currant, Phawker, Court TV forums, or any number of other blogs that have basically drummed you out.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Sydney, you’re not Michelle Blaine or affiliated with Michelle Blaine, by any chance, are you? You remind me of her and her vile Blog that others have commented on - because it is so viciously vindictive and repulsive about Phil and Rachelle Spector. Fortunately, it is now private. That’s the best way to protect hateful speech.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
from Kelley Lynch
to doronweinberg ,
Dennis ,
STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
“*irs. commissioner” ,
ASKDOJ ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
cc Jewel of Activity
date Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:42 PM
subject Re: Is Sydney - On Phawler.com and Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Law Blog Michelle Blaine Or Affiliated with Blaine?
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 6:42 PM (0 minutes ago)
cc: IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, and the DEA
- Hide quoted text -
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
I think this needs to be looked into. I captured Blaine’s comments and Blog “articles” about me and she is a vile and apparently vindictive person. She too understands; the enemy of my enemy is my friend. That is not necessarily true and one should not rely on that. Criminals, when backed into a corner, divide and turn on one another. Blogonaut-Gianelli, as you know, posted a comment about that and a conversation he had with someone in September 2009. Clearly, whether he is playing a game and toying with me now or not, that needs to be looked into. There is nothing innocent, whatsoever, about the activity on the worldwide Blog as it relates to the organized campaign of cyber-terrorism meant to silence and terrorize me, members of my family - including my sons, and Douglas Penick and possibly others.
Are these people actually going to run around slandering, maligning, and casting doubt on men like Ron Burkle, Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Dr. Dre, and others who have either witnessed something or many things; were dragged into this by Lindsey and/or Cohen; attempted to help me - as was the case with Steven Segal; and/or was used as some type of negotiating chip when Lindsey/Bergman were fraudulently attempting to use a threat of jail against me - and, from what Avery Cooper told me, force me into a deal using that threat.
These people are one-trick ponies. Look at the tactics on Phawker.com - particularly as they relate to Kelly Green. They are precisely the same tactics used against Phil and Rachelle Spector. In other words, it is a smear campaign. Unfortunately, for them, everything relevant they have stated publicly is a lie, malicious gossip, slander, and meant to undermine my credibility as a witness. They are aware that I intend to litigate matters. I have made this perfectly clear and Gianelli-Blogonaut threatened me with a lawsuit. Therefore, they know for a fact that I am a potential witness for myself and my children. I am in disbelief that I am now addressing - with Kelly Green (who threatened Rutger with prison - make no mistakes about that and it is going to be held responsible for that threat) - her preposterous allegation that the federal agencies copied in on my public emails documenting the destruction of my life are merely engaged in some mindless fantasy of mine. There are lies on Phawker.com stating that I have turned on Agent Sopko. I have not but, trust me, that was and remains Gianelli-Blogonaut’s goal once he realized he could get the FBI and/or Treasury to divulge information about a pending federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen and possibly others. This is what I believe and these are logical and sound conclusions to draw. That then goes to motive - as in, what is Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive? It has been stated publicly that if someone was attempting to sabotage a federal prosecution they would have to have a stake in it. First of all, I am not convinced that is true. Obstruction of justice is nothing other than obstruction of justice - even if you are merely a deranged madman attempting to derail a federal prosecution because your nuts. It is more serious when it is a government matter because taxpayer’s money is being spent on the investigations, prosecutions, etc. The question is really - what would make someone like Gianelli-Blogonaut, a lawyer in California, go to such lengths to lie about me, maliciously gossip and slander me, target me and my children, engage it what definitely appears to be witness tampering, witness harassment, witness intimidation, witness retaliation, criminal harassment, criminal stalking, cyber-stalking, cyber-terrorism, obstruction of justice, and in order to derail and/or sabotage a federal prosecution. When you ask that question you must remind yourself that he has communicated with Cohen’s legal council; contacted the FBI in Oakland; apparently - according to Joff Belark and perhaps himself - to say I was spamming Agent Sopko/the Treasury (which is utterly absurd); emailed Agent Sopko; has communicated with Alan Jackson; made public representations about Pat Dixon that relate to me; is publicly accusing me of “harassing” Alan Jackson (which is preposterous and shameless); contacted Investigator Frayeh; is now demeaning Agent Sopko and referring to her as my “pet;” and appears to be challenging the federal authorities to charge and prosecute him. He is, essentially, toying with a deadly serious matter and/or matters from my perspective. He and Joff Belark, his lying thug reporter (who may be disguising his identity), have posted on Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog that is affiliated with Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations. I was informed, and at this time it is hearsay, that Sprocket’s Blog is the mouthpiece for Donna Clarkson and Juror #9 appeared to be on that Blog at some point before the verdict was rendered. Michelle Blaine blatantly and publicly thanked Gianelli-Blogonaut for targeting my email accounts and Blogs. She has since taken her mControl Blog private which is precisely how hateful speech should be handled - privately with people who have like minds and similar motive. Gianelli-Blogonaut called Bruce Cutler and I believe that was an attempt to determine what his connection is to Phil Spector at this (or that) moment in time. That is not normal behavior. That is obsessive behavior and I “appear” to be at the heart of it. As someone pointed out, I am addressing with these Blog posters (who descended on me with respect to Phawker.com and not the other way around; and have now resorted to another Blog where I have been banned so they can cheerfully and pathetically trash me and target my children - using Bill Pavelic’s name to assist them with their insanity) Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen, deadly serious legal and probably criminal matters that involve a number of parties and agencies, etc., and I am stuck in the middle The possibility that I am a “prominent government witness” potentially has been raised as has a viable possibility that the IRS will prosecute Leonard Cohen and others for tax fraud and other criminal conduct.
After you have reminded yourself of these things - including the fact that Nat McBride received a death threat after she posted a Petition supporting Phillip’s innocent and emails criminally impersonating Bruce Cutler (for which I have been blamed and will demand a Department of Justice investigation into that matter - absolutely) - ask yourself this: what is Gianelli-Blogonaut’s true motive? Is he attempting to derail an IRS prosecution? Is he attempting to undermine Phil Spector’s appeal? Is he attempting to derail a possible federal investigation into Phil Spector’s matter that I am convinced is a set up?
The man is obsessed with me and he knows for a fact that I have contacted him, time and time again, in order to address his lies, malicious gossip, slander, the targeting of my children, and other issues I view as deadly serious matters. They are not, as he lamely suggests, spam and no decent person in their right mind would conclude they were. A decent human being, Nona Banks, rightly concluded that I have been targeted by lunatics. That is correct. Lunatics and liars - with motive.
Thank you.
Love,
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Sydney, you’re not Michelle Blaine or affiliated with Michelle Blaine, by any chance, are you? You remind me of her and her vile Blog that others have commented on - because it is so viciously vindictive and repulsive about Phil and Rachelle Spector. Fortunately, it is now private. That’s the best way to protect hateful speech.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Correction: One Gianelli realized he could not get these agencies to divulge information. He has now publicly noted that he is aware of their policies. These are my extremely personal views on Gianelli-Blogonaut and the legal issues I believe he should be facing - and, with respect to me, will be facing in a court of law.
November 29th, 2009 at 11:19 pm
Gianelli-Blogonaut, I am not document “irrelevancies” for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Sopko-Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan and/or others. You are in no position, whatsoever, to state publicly what is relevant to me or the other recipients of my emails - although you may speak for Alan Jackson. I do not know. You publicly spoke on behalf of Pat Dixon with respect to me so I am unclear about your relationship and/or communications with the Los Angeles District Attorney.
Call Agent Wynar/FBI and tell him to provide you with a letter confirming that he has slandered me, stated that I am a classic 5150 candidate, and confirmed that I am not a credible person and/or witness. Unless you can provide me with proof of these allegations do not address them with me again. I know for a fact that you and others on this Blog, your Gianelli-Blogonaut Law Blog, Blaine’s mControl Blog, and other internet sites are liars. You do not know me. I am a stranger and yet you have targeted me. The issues relate specifically to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s murder trial that I personally am convinced is a set up. I am also convinced that the federal government should investigate this egregious situation. Clearly these are not irrelevant issues. They are extremely serious matters.
How would you know what the United States Government considers irrelevant? Are you speaking for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, the Treasury - or are you speaking for Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and that “gang’ at the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office. I am assuming you are speaking for the federal government. What authority do you have to speak for a representative of the federal government and publicly state what is irrelevant to them. Supply me with a name, badge and/or employee number, contact information, and a direct quote. Your sweeping generalizations and lunatic remarks are indeed tiresome, tedious, and monotonous but I intend to address every malicious lie, when possible. I am a Mother, daughter, sister, friend, and my family, children, and friends have been targeted. They have been targeted by malicious liars and lunatics - such as yourself, an absolute stranger with apparent motive.
Apparently nothing I have written here is easily discernible and/or understandable for you and this malicious crowd. Case closed. I have stated the truth. Know that and know I will address these issues legally. Thank you for confirming that the posters on this Blog, your Blog, and elsewhere have a common foe - me, an absolute stranger. That confirms that I am the victim of liars and cyber-terrorists, etc.
As Phil Spector said “You must think you’re talking to someone who gives a shit.”
You don’t know what I need to learn or don’t need to learn. You do not and will never know me. I am an absolute stranger and view you as a maniacal lunatic with motive who has targeted my children, parents, sister and her husband, and Douglas Penick.
I am documenting every single utterance you and other malicious liars post about me - for the IRS and FBI. They, in turn, can determine if they feel an investigation and/or prosecution is warranted. I am not threatening to litigate. I intend to litigate these issues with you and that’s all you should be concerned about. I personally wouldn’t have set out to maliciously lie and undermine someone I didn’t know and that’s why I view you as dangerously unstable. I am incapable of having someone investigated by the IRS and/or FBI. I am convinced that I have raised credible issues that warrant investigations. The IRS, FBI, and others are the authorities and they - not I - will determine that. Are you so delusional that you are convinced I am the Commissioner and/or Director of one of these agencies or have a boyfriend at one who is appeasing me? That’s how utterly absurd you and your fellow posters sound. I reported extremely serious tax fraud to the IRS regarding Leonard Cohen. The penalties and interest are inconceivable to most people - approximately $30 million as of the fall of 2004. I have supplied them with an abundance of evidence in an extremely timely manner and the IRS knows this. What happens with the evidence that caused Rutger to be threatened with prison is no longer anyone’s business but mine, the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others that I may privately decide to divulge that information to. It is now a dead issue. I have documented, in emails, the destruction of my life and what I have been forced to undergo since refusing to meet with Cohen, his adviser Richard Westin, and hand over the corporate books and records so they could unravel Traditional Holdings, LLC, Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., and LC Investments, LLC. I do not know what else they had “planned” or who else was involved. I was offered 50% community property - presumably to lie and say Cohen was defrauded. My children’s lives have been destroyed and we have lost everything. That does not make me a liar. To the contrary.
I will ask the IRS and Treasury to review this post of yours and, in particular, this comment. I would like to know if they see a threat and/or veiled threat. It sounds like witness retaliation, to me, and I want to know their opinion on the matter.
“If you go after people, threaten to report them to the IRS or the FBI or to have them investigated or prosecuted or threaten to sue them, or slander them—let alone do all of the above in scores (in some cases hundreds) of emails—the objects of your animus are a. going to consider you an enemy and b. feel a certain simpatico with those who feel similarly victimized.”
No one has been victimized by me. You have victimized and trapped yourselves. Because you are liars behaving like lunatics with an absolute stranger.
I will note, for the IRS, FBI, Treasury, DOJ, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and possibly others, that you have publicly declared that you and the other malicious lying posters view my attempts to address the truth enemy activity. I get that - loud and clear. I will take precautions accordingly.
I don’t have a shtick. You came onto this Blog after me. Not the other way around, liar. For the record, I emailed the Hartford Courant, repeatedly, asking them to take down the slanderous comment section that related to me and unless you have formal confirmation declaring otherwise I will assume you are lying. That’s the best thing to assume with liars - that they are always lying. In that way, when they tell the truth - on occasion - one can be pleasantly surprised and have hope for mankind. For now, I’ll view every word you utter as a lie about me - because, for the most part, they are. I’ll advise the IRS and FBI, etc., that I was targeted on Court TV. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.
Kelley Lynch
November 29th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 7:24:40 PM
Subject: FBI
To the FBI,
I have publicly asked Gianelli-Blogonaut to contact Agent Wynar/FBI and ask him to confirm the slanderous statements he has made with respect to me in writing and then Gianelli-Blogonaut can post that for everyone to see.
Thank you.
Kelley Lynch
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 7:22:53 PM
Subject: cc: IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Agent Sopko, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan - My Response To Gianelli’s Latest Lies & Garbage
Forgive the typos, spelling errors, grammar, and punctuation. I do not have time to focus on those issues right now. This is an unbelievable assault on me and Gianelli is clear: it is witness retaliation. Read his last post (below) and draw your own conclusions - please note his preposterous conclusion that I run some federal agency.
Kelley
Kelley Lynch Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:19 pm
Correction: documenting irrelevancies.
November 29th, 2009 at 11:49 pm
For the record, Leonard Cohen defrauded me of 15% of the intellectual property and appears to have ensnared me in some type of major shame. He perjured himself in LA Superior Court when he said I was a trustee - constructive or otherwise. I was not and the corporate books and records (the indexes of which are filed with my Motion to Quash his insanity in Boulder, Colorado) prove that. I was not a partner on LC Investments, LLC. I was issued illegal K1s - directly to the IRS, bypassing me, and in the State of Kentucky. They are filed with my Motion to Quash. I am absolutely entitled to a complete and proper forensic accounting and will ask the IRS to undertake that accounting, using former Moss Adams due diligence accountings as evidence, since Cohen has gone to such grave extremes to prevent me from having one undertaken. Cohen was so desperate he had his lawyer file a Declaration in my son’s custody matter - after my son “witnessed” a conversation about tax fraud, missing state tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. Lindsey asked my son to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory while I was en route to Killer King being questioned about Phil Spector. Neal Greenberg raised, on record, the fact that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested - I believe that would have been when SWAT descended on May 25, 2005. They are well aware that I did not have a hostage and I am aware that they looked like deranged madmen. Leonard Cohen’s actions speak for themselves, will be addressed - by me, and these issues will be litigated. Please do not concern yourselves with my so-called statute of limitation issues. Fraud tolls the statute and I am waiting for the Opinions of the IRS and the State of Kentucky and information regarding the King Drew situation, the SWAT incident, and other matters. A wall of deadly silence is not a means to force the statutes. Neither is fraud and/or perjury.
Kelley Lynch
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 7:42:01 PM
Subject: IRS and FBI : Alan Jackson, Would You Hit Reply All And Confirm That You Personally Believe I Am Harassing You And Explain Your Position
To the IRS and FBI,
I am in major violation of what? That sounds like a threat. Take it however you want but that’s how I personally perceive it. I am stalking and harassing no one. I have asked, in the subject line of this email, that Alan Jackson - who knows how to email me - hit reply all and confirm that he personally feels I am harassing me and supports that allegation that was made on Blogonaut’s Law Blog and possibly Phawker’s Blog. I am stalking and harassing everyone on the net and yet Phawker’s Blog is evidence that cyber-terrorists descended on me with the motive to maliciously undermine my credibility and reputation while targeting my children, family members, and others. I am not stalking Blogonaut-Gianelli. He is a bald-faced liar and I have advised him that I will absolutely address every single lie he utters. Why should this man be permitted to absolutely trash me publicly and attempt to state that I have no recourse re. slander, defamation, and libel. The man does not know me. I am an absolute stranger who he - and others - have targeted and now view as an “enemy.” That sounds fairly heavy to me.
Why will Phawker’s Blog be shut down? What gives these terrorists the right to subvert freedom of speech with their lies, threats, malicious gossip, and threats, etc? What gives them the right to essentially subvert the Constitution of the United States of America - particularly when they descended on me with respect to Phawker.com. That is clearly laid out in the comment section of the article I responded to regarding Leonard Cohen. Leonard Cohen is, no doubt, involved with this activity. His legal counsel communicated with Gianelli-Blogonaut. I believe the IRS, FBI, and others should subpoena all communications between Gianelli-Blogonaut, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers, my so-called former friends and/or associates, the District Attorney of Los Angeles Office, Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and determine the identity of posters such as Kelly Green, KLisacyberstalker, Joff Belark, Sydney, and others who appear to be willfully participating in a campaign of cyber-terrorism meant to terrorize and silence me, my family, and friends. It is outlandish and malicious conduct.
The libraries I post from will be told what I am up to. These people are desperate and their attempts to silence me are extensive and astounding. I do believe I, and my family, need protection from them.
Kelley Lynch
KLisacyberstalker Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:42 am
I can’t believe KL is still stalking and harassing everyone on the net. It is clearly she is a cyber-terrorist who is stalking blogonaut. It’s out of control. She had every blog of her shut down. She started another one http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/.Cyber-terrorist watch dog? Are you kidding me. You are the cyber-terrorist KL. That blog will be shut down too. Enough of you.
KL is a cyberstalker Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:47 am
KL is a pathological liar who stole money from Leonard Cohen. Pay the judgement thief, KL. You have been banned from every site and blogs you rant and raved on. Stop your lies. No one believes you. Oh and those libraries you post from will be told what you are up to. Your days of being a cyber-terrorist are coming to an end. You are in major violation.
November 29th, 2009 at 11:53 pm
Correction: Cohen ensnared me in some type of major sham. Major shame works also. He has no shame and he has no conscience. I am well aware of this and I would assume Phil Spector is also.
November 30th, 2009 at 12:25 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 8:24:11 PM
Subject: Re: IRS and FBI : Alan Jackson, Would You Hit Reply All And Confirm That You Personally Believe I Am Harassing You And Explain Your Position
To the IRS and FBI,
Who is “Another Kelley Lynch victim” and why is it publicly monitoring/stalking me? Cohen’s a real laugh a minute - he was supposed to repay his loans (from Traditional Holdings, Inc. - which now stand at $8 million and there is a 1099 to prove that - and/or waste, distributions, transaction fees, etc. - his) at 6% interest within three years. Those loans, raised by Robert Kory in a letter and/or email to DiMascio & Berardo (when he asked if I would “forgive” them - they were real in 2004 so what happened), were taken in 2001, 2002, and 2003. It is now 2009. Does the IRS think three years have now passed and does the IRS think these loans should be repaid. I want the IRS Opinion on these issues. Cohen and/or his lawyers (and others who are publicly addressing his fraudulent judgment) is fastidious about the details regarding a default judgment he obtained based on fraudulent allegations, bald-faced lies (I was not a trustee - constructive or otherwise; the judgment appears to prove that I was defrauded), and perjured allegations and accusations. Why should I pay interest on his lies, fraud, and perjury? Any thoughts on that particular legal issue? I am telling you - Cohen thought he could make money off of his fraud. I literally believe that. Robert Kory told me, at our luncheon, that they intended to go “after” every single one of Cohen’s advisers. He told the waitress that we were there discussing a divorce and tax consequences. This is a repeated theme with Cohen and Kory - it, no doubt, relates to the offer of “50% community property.” Cohen had completed recording “Dear Heather.” The record would have sold. He has publishing income and I should, according to what his lawyer wrote about Old Ideas, LLC - which I am convinced needs to be invested, own 15% of the publishing that was assigned to that entity. It appeared in the liner notes. That was the intention and that was the agreement. Those original liner notes (I do not know if they were changed) were delivered to Sony and, in turn, they paid Leonard Cohen $1 million advance. I received a commission. Cohen refuses to address the 1099 and I absolutely view that as a gift now because he has gone to such great lengths to avoid discussing this with me or permitting his lawyers and/or representatives to address it with me. As of approximately October 21, 2004, Stuart Fried of Grubman, Indursky advised me that Sony/ATV made an offer on certain intellectual property. I own 15% of the intellectual property - including, but perhaps not limited to, record royalties, publishing royalties, performance royalties, and book publishing. Cohen and his lawyers are in possession of those assignments. Those are the assignments I discussed with John Maunts of the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet who advised me to put them in a safety deposit box. They should be in the possesion, as well, of the Grubman, Indursky firm and Richard Westin and probably others. I do not recall if I was able to provide these to the IRS because of the absolute non-stop insanity I have been dealing with since I switched accountants, was sent to tax lawyers, and they confirmed that I had been exposed to criminal tax fraud and used as an unwitting pawn. This is what I suspected. In any event, Cohen’s attention to his fraud, perjury, and lies is astounding. Are we now to believe that Robert Kory is not representing him and these are not the absolute actions of the master of disguise and fraud - Leonard Norman Cohen? Did Robert Kory, without Cohen’s authorization, file a Declaration in Ray’s custody matter? If so, why did he mention that he and Cohen did not want to be identified - in a legal document that is absolutely an IRS matter. The custody matter was meant to crush and destroy me and coerce me into some type of deal that I continue to believe was and is illegal. I believe the mediation was illegal. Why? Because it was meant to deceive the Internal Revenue Service, the State of Kentucky, and - no doubt - others. This was never meant to be brought to the attention of the Internal Revenue Service. The words “danger” and “peril” appear in certain documents - including an email of Richard Westin’s after I advised him that I no longer wanted to work with Leonard Cohen. He had to remain silent or he would be in peril. What does that mean to the IRS. What does it mean to the IRS when Cohen’s tax lawyer writes and says “Cohen’s level of borrowing is dangerous to the structure?” Why use the word “dangerous?”
Pay careful attention to these words: “mismanagement of Cohen’s estate.” I figured this out ages ago. Cohen and/or Kory are attempting to prove that this was estate planning and I was a trustee. His Last Will and Testament has nothing, whatsoever, to do with Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC and/or Traditional Holdings, LLC - which Cohen fully understood bypassed the estate and I understood that was intentional. Cohen chose not to have his children as beneficiaries. I did not understand that. There are emails documenting the questions Richard Westin answered. I believe the IRS is in possession of that email where Richard Westin addresses beneficiaries, ownership percentages, etc. I recall sitting with Cohen at a computer addressing these issues in an email and/or fax. I would assume Westin held onto that. You saw in the letter I requested from Richard Westin - addressing these structures - that he states this is Cohen’s estate planning. That is the first time I saw or heard that reference. You should have seen Westin’s concern for Cohen’s gift taxes. I know that Richard Westin attempted to address gift taxes and I know Ken Cleveland did. It is Cohen that did not want to pay gift taxes. This is why I do not want to blame his advisers in a blanket manner. Not every issue Richard Westin addressed was and/or is suspect. Why he engaged in this conduct is inconceivable to me. This is a rotten legal strategy and I saw it coming a million miles away. It is not valid, it is not rational, and - no doubt - it is illegal to claim that someone who is no longer a trustee of your estate was not an owner and/or partner on entities that really have nothing to do with Cohen’s death or estate - unless you’re talking about valuing your share at the time of your death or something like that.
I mismanaged nothing. Cohen is and will always be a malicious liar. He is the thief. The corporate books and documents prove this. You do not win when you have lied, committed fraud, and perjured yourself and submitted fraudulent documents to a court. That is a very interesting issue here. People do not seem to care that he has stolen from me and destroyed my life and targeted my family because of his wrongdoing. They seem to think his celebrity excuses and/or forgives his conduct. It does not. Everyone should be held to the same standard and the same laws.
Why doesn’t Leonard Cohen live in Canada? Why did he abandon his green card after Marty Machat’s death? Why did he obtain a new green card in 1991? The IRS and/or Immigration can review what occurred. What are the various social security numbers that caused Burt Goldstein alarm when I mentioned that I was providing evidence to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff? Why was Ed Dean concerned about assigning personal service contracts to Cohen’s Sabbath Day and Cohen Family Remainder Trusts. I had nothing to do with the creation of those entities but that was a very real issue. Ed Dean understood this - I am Cohen’s worst nightmare. Apparently he did not understand this: he is mine.
This person feels sad for me. No it does not. It is a liar defending Cohen’s fraud.
All the best,
Kelley
P.S. It is too late for nothing. They are fools, rotten lawyers, and lousy logicians.
Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
November 13th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
As usual, Kelley Lynch is calling the kettle black.
BTW Kelley Green, Lynch owes Cohen $7.6 million PLUS annual interest thereon at the CA judgment rate of 10% per annum from the date of entry of the judgment (May of 2005) until paid. This binding and enforceable CA judgment is premised on the Cohen complaint against her alleging civil theft and mismanagement of Cohen’s estate.
Kelley Green is correct about one thing: It is years too late for Lynch to set aside the CA judgment or to sue Cohen for anything arising out of their former business relationship.
Kelley Lynch lives in a homeless shelter by night and blogs about ancient history (her grievances against Cohen) from the Houston Public Library by day.
Since Lynch has family in Texas (a mother and a sister) one can draw their own conclusions as to why Lynch is living in a shelter and not with family.
Lynch’s inability or unwillingness to move forward with her life is sad really, and I might feel sorry for her if she was not so malicious and mean spirited.
November 30th, 2009 at 12:27 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 8:26:05 PM
Subject: Re: IRS and FBI : Alan Jackson, Would You Hit Reply All And Confirm That You Personally Believe I Am Harassing You And Explain Your Position
Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,
Alan Jackson has not advised me, in response to my inquiry and request for an explanation, that i am harassing him.
Do you think Cohen will ever move forward and take responsibility for his actions and his good rock ‘n roll stories and lies?
Love,
Kelley
November 30th, 2009 at 12:35 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 8:33:26 PM
Subject: Re: IRS and FBI : Alan Jackson, Would You Hit Reply All And Confirm That You Personally Believe I Am Harassing You And Explain Your Position
To the IRS,
What have Cohen’s loans now become? Are they bad debts that I can deduct from my tax returns - which definitely need to be addressed by an accountant. Perhaps the IRS Commissioner’s Staff could sit down with me and do my final tax returns with respect to the insanity known as Leonard Norman Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud. Dale Burgess told me that without Traditional Holdings, LLC I would have owed nothing with respect to 2001 - which was and remains the reason I switched accountants. The date of the tax notice will prove Cohen’s sole motive and will reveal the identity of “the informant” - it’s me. I don’t know if you agree but I would like your opinion.
All the best,
Kelley
November 30th, 2009 at 12:39 am
Ms. Lynch:
Do you see anything inconsistent with requesting protection from the IRS at the same time you are (once again) identifying yourself as an “informant” to alleged tax fraud on the world-wide-web?
November 30th, 2009 at 12:40 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com
Cc: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 8:38:46 PM
Subject: Re: IRS and FBI : Alan Jackson, Would You Hit Reply All And Confirm That You Personally Believe I Am Harassing You And Explain Your Position
To the IRS and/or FBI,
If someone has committed a crime do I have the right to report that crime, request an investigation, and expect - if it is determined that a crime or crimes have been committed - that it will be prosecuted? Or, should I assume that if I report a crime, request an investigation that determines criminal conduct warrants a prosecution, is that a threat? That seems to be Gianelli/Blogonaut’s legal rationale - set forth in the excerpt of his post on Phawker.com directly below. If you believe crimes are being committed is it a “threat” to report them? Is it illegal to report criminal activity to the authorities or should I send up smoke signals?
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 29th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
If you go after people, threaten to report them to the IRS or the FBI or to have them investigated or prosecute
November 30th, 2009 at 12:44 am
Gianelli-Blogonaut, is there a reason you and your gang of terrorists are so interested in protecting people that are criminals and victimizing their victims? I think it is consistent to report criminal tax fraud, identify myself as the individual that reported it, address the word “informant” that Cohen threw around in 2004 (which you probably were not “privy” to since you don’t know me and didn’t know him then), and ask for protection from the IRS and FBI. Why - do you think I should be subjected to retaliation because I am the witness that reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal? Should I be the subject of a smear campaign and your malicious lies and slander? Should my children be targeted? I have nothing to hide. I am merely surrounded by frauds, liars, and people I view as criminals with real motive. Be clear about that. Your logic is deranged and confirms that you have a bizarre line of thinking. We’re not in the Sopranos or a movie, Liar.
Kelley Lynch
Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
November 30th, 2009 at 12:39 am
Ms. Lynch:
Do you see anything inconsistent with requesting protection from the IRS at the same time you are (once again) identifying yourself as an “informant” to alleged tax fraud on the world-wide-web?
November 30th, 2009 at 1:04 am
From: Kelley Lynch
To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; robert.macmillan@gmail.com; moseszzz@mztv.com; dbergman@bergman-law.com; rand.hoffman@umusic.com
Cc: STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 9:02:39 PM
Subject: Re: IRS and FBI : Alan Jackson, Would You Hit Reply All And Confirm That You Personally Believe I Am Harassing You And Explain Your Position
To the IRS and FBI,
Can you follow Gianelli-Blogonaut’s latest line of thinking, if you can call it that? I am the individual that reported the tax fraud. I am the individual that was told this was my option. I am convinced that the IRS is the only authority who could “amend” those tax returns. Cohen is the individual who used the word “informant” and, trust me, he knew precisely what that word meant. He is a word-smith. That is his craft and the crafts his words, phrases, and stories very very carefully. I believe Gianelli-Blogonaut is attempting to prove that the fact that Cohen appears to have committed criminal tax fraud is fine. The problem, as he and others see it, is that I reported it and am a witness to much of what has happened and provided the IRS, and others, with evidence supporting the allegations - that were made by Dale Burgess and DiMascio & Berardo so Cohen should understand that I am not the one that made allegations of criminal tax fraud. I suspected tax fraud. It did not occur to me that it was criminal. I did not realize the depth or breadth of it. I did not realize much of anything until I reviewed certain documents and evidence - that relates to corporate entities I am either an owner of, partner on, or was used as an unwitting pawn for Cohen’s selfish means. That is my position. That is what happened. I will not change my mind - ever. It is the truth.
These lunatics think it is fine to target me because I reported criminal conduct to federal agencies. The issue of reporting crimes has risen time and again for me. I am not going to sit there and listen to someone talk about a murder the Dallas FBI is apparently investigating and keep my mouth shut. That is dangerous information and someone died. I have no vow to conceal information in what I was told is a criminal investigation by the FBI. Michael understands that I conveyed his comments to the DOJ and others. We all understand that the situation is a dangerous situation and you understand that I am concerned about Michael’s safety and, of course, his brother. We all know people have to take responsibility for their actions. That is all. There is nothing more and nothing less. I was told by Sergeant Joe/LAPD that LAPD hid evidence that relates to the Biggie Smalls “wrongful death” matter. I believe he used the word “murder.” That evidence is, according to Sergeant Joe/LAPD, a car and possibly a gun or a weapon wrapped in something. That was shocking information and that may explain why I cannot specifically recall every detail. I have an excellent memory. My family and a former family member know Dr. Dre and his family. Do people expect me to conceal that information and hold it secret and then live with myself? Christopher Wallace was someone’s son, husband, father, and friend - including a man that witnessed his murder. That man is a friend and partner of Ron Burkle’s - Sean Comb’s. These are terrible matters. I did not ask to be exposed to this information. I was. I conveyed the information to the appropriate authorities. It is not as though I am running around “reporting” potheads. One matter relates to the Dallas FBI, the Aryan Nation, meth labs - as Gianelli-Blogonaut has stated on more than one occasions (he’s now defending a man that Michael himself is scared to death of and from what I can tell, rightly so, and it is a tricky situation that requires careful careful thinking and strategies and I believe Michael will help the Dallas FBI if approached properly and decently … it is that simple), a cartel possibly, and a murder the Dallas FBI was and/or is investigating. Why is Gianelli-Blogonaut commenting on that matter in a contrary and snide way? Is it a game? It sounded terribly dangerous to me and it is the reason for one of my calls to a Duty Agent at the Denver FBI. It was not and will never be a local law enforcement issue from what I could tell. Fortunately, nothing ever arose but I was not going to end up in possession of anything that I consider criminal. Why would I want to? I have lived an honest and decent life and I am a Mother who has been targeted. That’s not a crime. Condoning criminal conduct is a crime from my perspective. I have been exposed to a tremendous amount of dangerous information and, actually, to dangerous scenarios and people I viewed as relatively dangerous people - when I ended up homeless. I also ended up exposed to wonderful people including my friend Country.
Why should I be forced to hide out? What right does anyone have to tell me that I cannot acknowledge the fact that I informed the IRS that I was exposed to criminal tax fraud - as confirmed by Dale Burgess and DiMascio & Berardo - relating to Leonard Cohen and to provide evidence in support of those allegations? What right does that give these lunatics to target me, my friends, and family members. I feel like I’m in some “mob” story where people are being advised to go into the witness protection program. Or “enroll.” Maybe the “feds’ would like to enroll in that “program.” I don’t. I’ll probably end up meeting Sammy Gravano and hearing one more rotten and dangerous story that I will be forced to “report” to my government.
I believe there is a way for my family to remain safe while at the same time I acknowledge that I did inform the IRS of the allegations that were confirmed for me. It does not seem that complicated to me. At the heart of that matter will be investigations, charges, and prosecutions. People who have done nothing usually do not behave in a desperate manner. Strangers and anonymous people with motive threatening me and my family publicly may. I do not intend to speculate and should not be asked to.
Please