Phawker

You Report, We Decide

News, Media, Politics, Music, Culture, Gossip, In The 215 And The Great Beyond

MAILBAG: “Leonard Cohen Is Not A ‘Great Man'”

leonardcohen1969sepia_1.jpg

DEAR PHAWKER:

Leonard Cohen is not a great man. He appears to have committed criminal tax fraud that I reported to the IRS, probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury, defrauded me of millions, and seems to think it’s acceptable to lie in every courtroom he shows up in. There is nothing great about a calculated fraud liar. I am praying that Phil Spector nails him on his probable perjury and I personally will be litigating my own situation against him in the not too distant future. While journalists may be awed by a man who also appears to have a pattern of stealing from his advisers (Marty Machat comes to mind) ordinary folks are not impressed with his involvement with the destruction of my life. I’m not particularly impressed by his lawyer’s Declaration in my young son’s custody matter (which I view as coercion, witness tampering, an attempt to obstruct justice, etc.) and I found it truly deranged that he went into my young son’s father’s office to “allege” that I had sex with Oliver Stone. This just confirmed, to me, that Cohen is obsessed with me and keenly interested in my sex life. I never had sex with Oliver Stone and I was not Leonard Cohen’s lover. He is merely a pathelogical liar who believes Phil Spector and I will take the fall for him.

Kelley Lynch [former manager of Leonard Cohen]

http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/2009/09/kelleys-final-version-letter-to-alan.html

***

DEAR PHAWKER,

To those of you who have not yet been “lucky” enough to meet Kelley Lynch on the internet, you are hereby warned that she is a very disturbed woman so filled with hate and desire for revenge that I believe she can be dangerous to anyone who gets involved with her and her crazy rantings.

Ms. Lynch was indeed Leonard Cohen’s personal manager for several years. However, a few years ago Leonard Cohen discovered that Ms. Lynch had stolen and mismanaged his entire savings. Cohen fired her, sued her and won a kelley-lynch-et-leonard-cohen.jpgjudgement of $7.9 million. However, Ms. Lynch vanished and never made an attempt to pay back the money she stole from the old poet, instead she (from where ever she was hiding) started to harass Mr. Cohen and his lawyer (E-mails and phonecalls). In 2008 Leonard Cohen obtained a restraining order against Ms. Lynch, which she accepted, but she then started a vicious hate campaign against Leonard Cohen by targeting every newspaper/magazine forum and blog who would bring a favorable review of a performance. Ms Lynch has in the most disgusting manner slandered and lied about Mr. Cohen and his family; she has accused him of every crime in the book from tax fraud, thief, child molester, perjurer and much more. Any blogger who will respond and disagree or object to her brutal attacks, she will verbally abuse and often threaten to “report” to the Department of Justice or even at one point to “Department of Crimes against Humanity” in Haag, for making her look and sound “not credible” and for obstructing justice. She will also turn things around and play the “Victim”, accusing all who in a disagreeable way replies to her postings, that we are “l stupid, insane liers that are cyberstalking and harassing her, her children and parents and destroying her life.

In the past few years Ms. Lynch has sent several hundred E-mails to the IRS and other public offices and demanded that they investigate and punish Leonard Cohen and everybody she believes are in conspiracy with him to destroy her life. For several years she has “been waiting” for Bruce Cutler or some other high profile lawyer from Phil Spector’s legal team” to knock on her door and take her law suit against Cohen and others.

Ms. Lynch has been banned from practically every blog and forum she has posted on as most of the blogs she has established herself have been removed for “Slanderous and hateful content”.

It should be noted that Leonard Cohen has never been arrested, charged or prosecuted for any wrong doing as well as he has never responded to Ms. Lynch’s slanderous hate campaign, and since the legal matters were finalized he has never publicly spoken of Ms. Lynch or her bertrayals.

Sincerely
Susanne Walsh

 ***

THE CANADIAN ENCYCLOPEDIA: TAKE AN ICONIC ARTIST, mix in missing millions, hints of tantric sex, a lawsuit replete with other salacious details, and a ruptured relationship with a long-time, trusted associate, and you’ve got the makings of a Hollywood blockbuster. Except in the case of Leonard COHEN, it’s a true tale, with the bizarre twist of a Tibetan Buddhist suing a Zen Buddhist, Cohen. For the 70-year-old poet, singer and songwriter, it’s a nasty, rapidly escalating legal battle that on the one hand accuses him of conspiracy and extortion, and on the other has him accusing both his highly trusted personal manager and long-time financial adviser – the Tibetan Buddhist – of gross mismanagement of his financial affairs. The case exposes not only private details of Cohen’s finances, but also a dramatic tale of betrayal.

The conflict, which Cohen and others have tried to keep out of public view, has left him virtually broke – he’s had to leonard_cohen_im_your_man_1.jpgtake out a mortgage on his house to pay legal costs – and facing a multi-million-dollar tax bill. […] The conflict was triggered last fall when Cohen was tipped off by an insider that a lot of money was missing from his accounts. All that remained of his retirement savings was the $150,000, funds that today he can’t get at as a result of the tangled legal web he finds himself in. Greenberg’s suit portrays the soulful songwriter as an artist who paid little attention to his financial affairs and so was easily duped by a conniving personal manager. Cohen says he tried quietly, and confidentially, to find out from his various managers where the money had gone. Cohen calls the case “a tragedy,” suggesting he was exploited by trusted advisers. He uses words like “greed, concealment, and reckless disregard,” and says firmly he did nothing wrong. “I can assure you, within reason, I took every precaution except to question the fidelity of my closest associates.”

UNTIL COHEN fired her last fall, Kelley Lynch had been his personal manager for almost 17 years. Back in 1988, she’d been working as an assistant to his then-manager, who died that year. Because she was knowledgeable about Cohen’s business affairs and recording contracts, he had her take over. Over the years, the two developed a personal and professional relationship. Fifteen years ago, they had a brief affair. “It was a casual sexual arrangement. It was mutually enjoyed and terminated,” he says. “I never spent the night.” The end of the affair didn’t affect their bond. “We were very, very close friends,” Cohen says today. “I liked her immensely. Our families were close – she was helpful when I was raising my daughter; I employed her father.” He even named her in his living will, giving her the power to decide, in certain circumstances, if he would live or die. He handed her vast powers of attorney. He trusted her implicitly. And he believed the relationship was mutual. MORE

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

2,004 Responses to “MAILBAG: “Leonard Cohen Is Not A ‘Great Man'””

  1. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Dear Blogger
    To those of you who have not yet been “lucky” enough to meet Kelley Lynch on the internet, you are hereby warned that she is a very disturbed woman so filled with hate and desire for revenge that I believe she can be dangerous to anyone who gets involved with her and her crazy rantings.
    Ms. Lynch was indeed Leonard Cohen’s personal manager for several years. However, a few years ago Leonard Cohen discovered that Ms. Lynch had stolen and mismanaged his entire savings. Cohen fired her, sued her and won a judgement of $7.9 million. However, Ms. Lynch vanished and never made an attempt to pay back the money she stole from the old poet, instead she (from where ever she was hiding) started to harass Mr. Cohen and his lawyer (E-mails and phonecalls). In 2008 Leonard Cohen obtained a restraining order against Ms. Lynch, which she accepted, but she then started a vicious hate campaign against Leonard Cohen by targeting every newspaper/magazine forum and blog who would bring a favorable review of a performance. Ms Lynch has in the most disgusting manner slandered and lied about Mr. Cohen and his family; she has accused him of every crime in the book from tax fraud, thief, child molester, perjurer and much more. Any blogger who will respond and disagree or object to her brutal attacks, she will verbally abuse and often threaten to “report” to the Department of Justice or even at one point to “Department of Crimes against Humanity” in Haag, for making her look and sound “not credible” and for obstructing justice. She will also turn things around and play the “Victim”, accusing all who in a disagreeable way replies to her postings, that we are “l stupid, insane liers that are cyberstalking and harassing her, her children and parents and destroying her life.
    In the past few years Ms. Lynch has sent several hundred E-mails to the IRS and other public offices and demanded that they investigate and punish Leonard Cohen and everybody she believes are in conspiracy with him to destroy her life. For several years she has “been waiting” for Bruce Cutler or some other high profile lawyer from Phil Spector’s legal team” to knock on her door and take her law suit against Cohen and others.
    Ms. Lynch has been banned from practically every blog and forum she has posted on as most of the blogs she has established herself have been removed for “Slanderous and hateful content”.
    It should be noted that Leonard Cohen has never been arrested, charged or prosecuted for any wrong doing as well as he has never responded to Ms. Lynch’s slanderous hate campaign, and since the legal matters were finalized he has never publicly spoken of Ms. Lynch or her bertrayals.
    Sincerely
    Susanne Walsh

  2. Kelley Lynch Says:

    To Phawker,

    Thank you for supporting freedom of speech. Susanne Walsh has written me, privately, that she does not know Leonard Cohen and feels she can speak on behalf of Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and the Treasury Department based on intuition. It would seem to me that if one were using true intuition one might assume the IRS is actually interested in criminal tax fraud with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million. One might also wonder why Agent Sopko/Treasury flew into California to meet with me and referred me to Agent Luis Tejeda/IRS Fraud Unit/Los Angeles with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, and reported to the IRS.

    I feel I have a right to publicly defend myself. Leonard Cohen, and others, have slandered me, maligned me, and have targeted my children.

    Leonard Cohen did not discover anything having to do with his so-called finances (managed by Neal Greenberg) in the fall of 2004. He discovered that I switched accountants and was told that I should see lawyers due to the fact that Cohen had involved me – unknowingly – in fraud on various entities. Walsh has not reviewed the evidence (corporate books, stock certificates, notarized documents, memorandums, deal memos, emails, etc.) that I have shared with the IRS and therefore cannot address criminal tax fraud. I tend to doubt she is a tax lawyer in any event. Cohen did not fire me. Cohen wanted me to meet with him and his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, to unravel the work they did relating to Traditional Holdings, LLC and LC Investments, LLC – and possibly other entities. I refused and my lawyer wrote Westin asking him, as the architect of Traditional Holdings, LLC, to explain the structure and my tax liability. This is where things escallated but I was not “fired” and I did not steal. Cohen owes me millions and is well aware that he compensated me with 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. which owned all intellectual property. Cohen sued me because I went to the IRS. I refused to participate in that lawsuit because I felt (and continue to believe) that the suit was nothing other than an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and criminal conduct. Cohen didn’t “win” a judgment. He perjured himself and lied when he said I was a trustee – constructive or otherwise. I have requested, from the IRS, an Opinion Letter on this issue and others and will respond to Cohen’s lawsuit once I have the IRS and State of Kentucky’s Opinions. It would be impossible to respond, otherwise, because I am not a tax lawyer and what has been done is incredibly complex. Cohen’s own accountant told me it reminded him of Enron.

    Cohen obtained a fraudulent restraining order against me after Ann Diamond made it clear, in writing, that Freda Guttman told her that Lorca Cohen informed her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. And, Ann Diamond wrote a draft article fo Rolling Stone emphasizing the facts of this matter and what has happened to my life. This caused Cohen, via Kory, to threaten her. Shortly thereafter (to my shock and amazement) Cohen took out a fraudulent restraining order against me – which was, essentially, a way to prevent me from communicating with Robert Kory: about the illegal K1s I was issued, my intellectual property that has been stolen, a 1099 I never received (on monies I now view as a gift because no one will address them), Kory’s Declaration in my young son’s custody matter (witness tampering), and other “tax matters.”

    I did not vanish but Walsh, as usual, likes to perpetrate lies and shows up on other Blogs that are dead set on undermining my credibility – essentially witness tampering and attempting to obstruct justice. These Blogs include Blogonaut and Michelle Blaine’s mControl. Blogonaut even offered to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen and appeared to state that Cohen was willing to help me and I could have my former life back – including my children.

    I have never harassed Cohen or his lawyer. The truth is not a hate campaign. It is merely the truth although people, including Cohen and Kory, have gone to extreme lengths to silence me. I didn’t “target” newspapers, etc. I began responding to articles, etc. when I noticed that I was slandered or lied about. That seems reasonable. I have never slandered and/or lied about Cohen and/or his family.

    My advisers, DiMascio and Berardo and Dale Burgess told me that Cohen had committed criminal tax fraud and exposed me to it. Dale Burgess asked me to inform the IRS and Treasury that he would testify to the fact that Cohen offered me 50% community property – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers which is preposterous. Cohen’s disdain for “ordinary income taxes” is quite possibly unprecedented.

    Let me repeat this statement: Freda Guttman told Ann Diamond, a former friend of Cohen’s, that Lorca Cohen told her classmates (or friends) at Concordia that her father molested her. I have this in writing from Ms. Diamond.

    I have written to the Hague about a number of issues – including the fact that I believe the human rights violations in Tibet are egregious. My teachers and friends live there and continue to live in unconscionable circumstances. Every Tibetan friend I have has had a relative murdered or imprisoned. I have no idea why feeling compassionate for the Tibetan people would be viewed as crazy. Ignoring devastating civil rights violations is crazy to me. I can assure you that I didn’t write the Hague about Cohen. That’s another absolutely absurd statement.

    I am not playing the victim. My life has been destroyed because I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and because I am a friend of Phil Spector’s. I am also firmly convinced that Leonard Cohen perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury and only a fool would believe that Mr. Spector will not attack that situation legally.

    For the record, my Mother told me she is convinced that these maniacs will target her which is unconscionable to me. Both of my children have already been targeted.

    Perhaps Susanne Walsh is a “secret IRS Agent” and knows what is going on with the IRS internally. It is conceivable, I suppose, that she has insider information.

    I have never used the word “punish” when writing to any agency or anyone else about Leonard Cohen. I have stated, quite clearly, that I believe he should be investigated, charged, arrested, and tried for what I am convinced are crimes.

    I am not waiting for Bruce Cutler or some other high profile lawyer from Phil Spector’s legal team to knock on my door. I am, however, waiting to speak with Phil Spector directly and if anyone thinks we aren’t going to speak they are delusional and do not know either Mr. Spector or myself.

    I have not been banned from Blogs – other than Blogonaut’s, Michelle Blaine’s (which was a vile and malicious site that seemed dead set on villifying Phil Spector for personal reasons), and perhaps others that I am unaware of. My content is not slanderous and hateful. It is the truth although the conduct on the part of many has been hateful – at best.

    Cohen has recently spoken about the situation with me publicly – in a televised interview in Finland. Apparently this isn’t a spiritual exercise. That, to me, is merely further evidence of Cohen’s nauseatingly carefully crafted comments – tailor made for the news media.

    The legal matters are not finalized and I do not believe California is the jurisdiction where I will file my suit against Cohen. I cannot imagine how a California Court would have jurisdiction over a Kentucky and Delaware entity. Fortunately, I’m not taking legal advice from the idiots and liars following me around the internet in an attempt to silence me. It is no doubt timed to coincide with Phil Spector’s appeal. The stakes are high when a legend has been “framed” by a District Attorney. That may be why so many people are wondering why the “prosecutor” hasn’t been arrested yet.

    Kelley Lynch

  3. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Dear Phawker
    I will not comment on Kelley Lynch’s perception of the truth, readers may make up their own minds.
    I will however correct some statements by Ms. Lynch that I know as facts.
    Kelly Lynch “Cohen has recently spoken about the situation with me publicly in a televised interview in Finland”
    The interview with Leonard Cohen, Anjani Thomas and Al Gore was televised on March 30, 2007 (more than 2 ½ years ago,) and it was in Norway. Leonard Cohen was asked about “the situation” and he briefly touched on the facts that he has lost his savings, but he did not elaborate and did not mention the name Kelley Lynch.
    Kelley Lynch states that she “has not been banned from forums or blogs. That is NOT true, at least two of her own blogs have been removed by Google for hateful and slanderous content and many of her postings have been removed by various newspapers, most recently on October 26, 2009 by “Creative Loafing.com” in connection with a review of Leonard Cohen’s concert at The Fox.
    Administrater of the blog says:
    NOTE: A grand total of 3 comments were removed from the thread below because they were posted by a troll, and as such are a clear violation of our comments policy. That is all.
    A comment on the thread posted by “Truth to be told”
    “Ms. Lynch is a known cyber-stalker, who posts similar comments widely across the webb. Very sad.”

    Sincerely
    Susanne Walsh

  4. Kelley Lynch Says:

    In refutation of Susanne Walsh’s latest round of lies: Walsh stated that Cohen had not spoken publicly against me since the legal issues between us were resolved. They have not been resolved and he gave this interview in Finland after he filed his bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached. If Leonard Cohen thinks allegations of criminal tax fraud and perjry in the Phil Spector matter (and elsewhere) are “pesky details” that, to me, is evidence that he is not thinking correctly. Cohen didn’t lose his savings. He has said that he lost his retirement. Unfortunately, the “private annuity” (which, I assume, is the retirement fund he has referred to publicly) was “extinguished” on the tax return by his tax lawyer. Richard Westin emailed me that he only represented Leonard Cohen and not me. The promissory note I invested in Traditional Holdings, LLC with was also extinguished. The income from the sale to Sony was not reported on the tax returns. All of this was done, ostensibly, in order to roll Traditional Holdings back into LC Investments, LLC. Sometime after I refused to meet with Cohen in the fall of 2004, refused to accept 50% community property as part of what I viewed as an illegal deal, I was issued illegal K1s on LC Investments, LLC. This was brought to my attention by the IRS. There are no partnership documents in place on this entity and it is – no doubt – illegal. Cohen borrowed millions against his so-called “retirement” account and was supposed to repay them at 6% interest within three years. Walsh has no idea what she is talking about and I think it’s safe to assume that she has not reviewed the corporate books, records, stock certificates, and other evidence I have supplied the IRS and others with. I also tend to doubt she is a forensic accountant. Cohen’s forensic accountant, Kevin Prins – Moss Adams, determined that a tremendous amount of back-up documentation (including asset valuations re. my share of intellectual property, etc.) was missing. My accountant, after meeting with him, put that in a fax to my lawyers. That document has now been made a matter of public record and is attached – with other evidence – to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order in Boulder, Colorado. When people heard that Cohen flew into Boulder to lie further they thought it was evidence that he is “insane.” The indexes of the corporate books and records are also filed as evidence and there are no documents proving that I own 99.5% of LC Investments, LLC – which is precisely what two K1s and a cover letter provided to the State of Kentucky prove.

    I believe I am the victim of cyber-terrorism. I personally removed my Blog (philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com) after capturing truly malicious comments. I have notified Google that my other Blogs and email accounts were targeted by cyber-terrorists (including Michelle Blaine, Blogonaut, Gianelli, Belark, and others) and will subpoena that information at a later date in time. I notified the Hartford Courant of the slander on their Blog – via emails – and asked them to remove the comments. They were removed and until I subpoena that information I do not know if they were removed based on my request or not.

    I have no idea about “CreativeLoafing.com” but will look into this as well and have brought it to the attention of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and the Treasury Department. I would like to know who “Truth to be told” is and believe this campaign of cyber-terrorism is meant to silence me. There is evidence, with Boies Schiller, that Cohen and Kory planned to silence me, terrorize me, and crush me – particularly if I spoke the truth about Cohen.

    This situation is not “very sad.” It is pathetic. In Cohen’s Norwegian interview he notes that the situation with me is a “pesky detail.” There is nothing “pesky” about deadly serious allegations of criminal tax fraud, perjury in a murder trial, etc. I have no idea what Walsh’s motive is but she seems intent on involving herself in this matter. She continues to refer to my children who have been highly traumatized by this ordeal. My younger son, as I have stated, witnessed a conversation between me and Robert Kory about Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; my intellectual property that was stolen by Cohen; the missing state tax returns; and their threats. At this moment in time, Cohen and Kory began “encouraing” my younger son’s father to take my son away from me. This is witness tampering and I took shorthand notes of my son’s comments and memories about the meeting he witnessed between me and Robert Kory and have conveyed them – with his permission – to the IRS.

    Kelley Lynch

  5. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    Sadly, Ms. Walsh speaks the truth, Kelley Lynch does not.

    Kelley Lynch is currently living in a homeless shelter in the Houston Texas area where she blogs her hate filled diatribes to all who will listen from a nearby branch of the public library.

    Kelley Lynch has written hundreds, if not thousands, of emails, all copied the IRS, Justice Department, governors, prosecutors, and others (you name it), accusing me (and other bloggers who dared to disagree with her) of being a criminal, being guilty of “obstruction of justice”, cyber stalking, cyber terrorism, etc. and then posted these rambling and insane emails on her various blogs–many of which have been taken down by Google as Ms. Walsh claims.

    Kelley Lynch’s current financial, legal, and custody problems stem from a series of unfortunate ethical, lifestyle, and substance abuse choices that were are Lynch’s responsibility and no one else’s.

    Incidentally, Lynch stalked Phil Spector attorney Bruce Cutler for years by leaving him 10-20 long rambling and unwanted voice messages on his office phone a day, and Spector’s high profile investigator also went public, stated that Lynch is seriously disturbed, and that he has nothing to do with her. Nor is there any proof that Leonard Cohen even testified before Phil Spector’s grand jury—let alone falsely. Certainly neither Lynch nor Cohen testified in either of Phil Spector’s criminal trials.

    Curiously, Lynch—who claims to be a “dear friend” of Spector’s—did not attend a single day of either of Spector’s two criminal trials to show moral support either.

    At this point Lynch is just another tragically obsessed, rambling and semi-coherent homeless person with a sob story who is no closer to getting help for herself and thereby reuniting with her children and family members.

  6. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Kelley Lynch states that she is not slandering Leonard Cohen, because she is “telling the truth” , and the truth is not slander.
    Now the truth can be several things, the factual truth and the perceived truth, there is Kelley Lynch’s truth and Leonard Cohen’s truth and if they believe in a God there is the truth they will have to face on “judgement day”, but the only truth that really matters in the eyes of the world, is the what the legal system has determined to be the truth, and that is that Kelley Lynch has stolen or defrauded Leonard Cohen of millions of dollars.
    Unless, or untill , Kelley Lynch has filed and won a counter suit, all her accusations and alegations of Leonard Cohens “crimes” WILL be slander and lies.
    If Kelley Lynch really has all that evidence and proof of Leonard Cohen’s “crimes” as she claims, it should be “a piece of cake” for her to get Leonard Cohen put behind bars and get all the “millions” back, she claims he owes her, but writing about it on the web is not the way to do it.
    Regarding the “Cyberstalking”. Kelley Lynch cyberstalk innocent reporters and journalist who are doing their job of reporting and reviewing a performance by Leonard Cohen, and then barge in and overtake the forum with all her private problems of hate, that has nothing to do with the performance.
    All blog-owners and administrators have the right to deceide which comments and posts they will accept. Most have a policy of not accepting “Personal, defamitory, slanderous attacks” and faul language. It is safe to say that Ms. Lynch ignore these rules. Therefore most of her comments, posts and blogs gets deleted or removed, not because Leonard Cohen, Robert Cory or anybody else wants to “silence” her.
    As for me mentioning her children, it is only because Ms. Lynch constantly try to get sympathy by mentioning that her children and her elderly parents are being targeted by “bloggers”. We do not target her family. Kelley Lynch subjects her family to unbelivable embarressment and humiliation by her bizare behavior.
    Susanne Walsh

  7. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Susanne Walsh does not speak the truth. She views this situation, from what I can tell, as entertainment. Walsh is also a bald-faced liar. My older son wants to join me in a lawsuit against Cohen, Lindsey, and others, for the destruction of our lives. He has witnessed much of what has occurred and knows for a fact that he was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my former house to Cohen/Kory while I was being taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector. Cohen’s actions are indeed ugly and hateful.

    I am assuming that the other Kelley Lynch “victim” is Blogonaut/Gianelli who seems to have lied to Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland about the fact that I am or was spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the Treasury Department. It seems preposterous to assume that Agent Sopko, who I met, is unable to speak for herself. Lying to the FBI is criminal and I believe this should be pursued. I also believe Blogonaut/Gianelli’s “motive” should be investigated – including “its” attempt to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen – who, apparently – would be willing to help me. All I would have to do, as usual, is lie. Cohen should have realized, when I declined his offer of 50% community property, that I would not lie for him.

    I have no idea why this individual is dead set on posting my whereabouts and these are not diatribes. I am presently working on my book entitled “Merry Christmas To The Denver FBI” which will include more information on Leonard Cohen, his tax fraud (that I was told is criminal), and – hopefully – an interview with Phil Spector on Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury.

    I have been documenting the destruction of my life for quite a long time now – for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others. I am presently waiting for an IRS Opinion Letter on various matters – including why Cohen led me to believe that there was a “private annuity obligation” when it had been extinguished from the tax return; whether or not his loans from Traditional Holdings, LLC need to be repaid and why they were “dangerous” to the structure; and where the IRS thinks my share of intellectual property is – Cohen’s own accountant believed, as did mine, that it was still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Once I have the Opinion Letter I will speak to the criminal attorney I am presently consultnig about filing my lawsuit – against Cohen – in the proper venue. He – not I and not cyber-terrorists – will determine what the proper jurisdiction is.

    I have no substance abuse issues and Blogonaut/Gianelli will be able to prove this – and their other absurd lies – when hell freezes over.

    Bruce Cutler will have to take the stand and comment, for himself, about my telephone messages and the faxes he received, a letter from my son’s school that was mailed to him, and why his investigator – Dale Kelly – met with me in Santa Monica. Phil Spector can address Bill Pavelic’s public comments. I have nothing further to say about Bill Pavelic but assume his allegations that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaliation for the OJ trial are true. Whether or not Cohen testified in Phil Spector’s grand jury, as Mick Brown/UK Telegraph advised me, is well known to Phil Spector and Cohen makes an “appearance” in the District Attorney’s Motion In Limine. There should also be some type of report from the day the detectives I met rolled by Cohen’s house to interview him about his comments, to the news media, over the years. Those are Cohen’s “good rock ‘n roll stories” as he told the detectives.

    Fortunately, as Investigator Frayeh, and I discussed I did not testify in Phillip’s trial. I also did not drag myself into it. An anonymous tip was placed – to the DA by a woman – about my friendship with Mr. Spector. That’s right – I did not attend the shameless, horrifying set up of Mr. Phil Spector. Attending a fraudulent public circus is not the only way to show one’s support for Mr. Spector. Blogonaut/Gianelli cannot speak for Phil Spector although “it” does speak for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Agent Wynar – FBI Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, and others.

    People reading my emails have no difficulty, whatsoever, following them. As my friend Terre Roche understood: there’s something wrong with the fact that Cohen’s being feted in the news media while I ended up in a homeless shelter. Apparently this is something for a man who has defrauded me of millions to be proud of.

    I am very close with my parents and children. My Mother is encouraging me to write a book and I intend to do that.

    Cyber-stalkers Blogonaut and Walsh, who continues to write me, cannot prevent “Merry Christmas to the Denver FBI” from coming out. I think publishers will be most interested in this scandalous, salacious story.

    Trust me – Cohen and Kory want to silence me. They’re perjury, fraud, and shameful restraining orders are evidence of this. The good news – Phil Spector has not been accused of being Cohen’s “lover.”

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. It’s not my job to put Cohen behind bars. I think it will be easy for Phil Spector to prove Cohen perjured himself in his grand jury.

    P.P.S. Certain “innocent journalists” – such as Larry Rohter/NY Times have actually asked me to call them. Let me quote my former lawyer, Michael Taitelman: when there’s a “he said/she said story” – you go to the corporate bokos and records. Please refer to the corporate indexes I filed with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s insanity with the Boulder Municipal Court. They prove I did not own LC Investments, LLC but was illegally issued K1s by Leonard Cohen.

  8. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Bruce Cutler can talk to my Mother about the fact that she, and others, hoped I would marry him. Last I heard my sex life was not anyone’s business. Please see my letter to Phil Spector’s prosecutor which addresses the fact that William Frayeh, an investigator on the Phil Spector matter, told me Pat Dixon was good looking. He also emailed me that he had passed my letter onto the parties I asked him to: District Attorney Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, and Truc Do. Investigator Frayeh did not think the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury were playing games. I have also contacted the DEA to request an independent investigation into Clarkson’s “suicide” at Phil Spector’s house. They investigated Anna Nicole Smith and Heath Ledger’s deaths and other people’s lives did not appear to be in danger in those incidents.

    cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com

  9. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.P.S. Perhaps Blogonaut-Gianelli shouldn’t be so proud/amused by the fact that “it” has lied to the FBI in Oakland. Last I heard lying to the FBI was a crime. In this instance, it is clearly a joke and I think it’s safe to say that the FBI has a far greater tolerance for people who lie to them and waste their resources than I have … IF they believe it is acceptable and IF they do not intend to investigate these matters. I remain unconvinced that everyone at the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and/or the Treasury are stupid mindless idiots. I am convinced that Gianelli/Blogonaut think they are.

  10. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Kelley Lynch’s “Friend” thinks there is something wrong with the fact that Leonard Cohen is being feted in the news media, while Kelley Lynch ended up in a homeless shelter.
    Some may find it strange that the “alleged” fraud is hiding out in various corners of the country, spending her life writing hateful slander about the person she defrauded, while the victim is working an unbelivable scedule so he can enjoy the retirement he had planned several years ago.
    What is right with this picture is, that in spite of Ms. Lynch’s effort to smear Leonard Cohen’s reputation, she herself may be the most disliked and disrespected person in Cyber-world, while Leonard Cohen has gained more than “Obama-like” popularity and respect worldwide. It just shows that bad things come to bad people and good things to good people after all.
    Some may also wonder where “The Millions of dollars” Ms. Lynch claims Leonard Cohen stole or defrauded her of, came from? Unless Ms. Lynch wrote and performed some Eminem kind of pop song that nobody knows about, it seems that “The Millions of Dollars” must have come from Leonard Cohen’s “Pornographic Imagery interwoven with biblical references”, that she never liked and made no sense to her (as Ms. Lynch stated elsewhere).
    Susanne Walsh

  11. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Dear Phawker,

    I have been forced to block Susanne Walsh from my email account. She decided to review my Blog and felt sympathy about my foot, staph infection, etc.

    As the Director of the Star of Hope noted (after reviewing some of the “insanity”) – everyone knows where you are. He then wondered about my safety. I assured him that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury, Agent Wynar – the FBI, and many others know very well where I am. I am not hiding out and that is another lie by a woman I do not know. I am not spending my life writing hateful slander about Cohen. I am telling the truth and he has stolen millions from me. I just wrote the State of Kentucky this morning about the Opinion Letter I am awaiting from them. I am also awaiting an Opinion Letter from the IRS. I have no interest, whatsoever, in Walsh’s theories – because she does not know me, did not know Cohen when I worked as his personal manager, does not have the corporate books, records, etc. and is dead set apparently on slandering me in order to help out her idol. That’s questionable motive from my perspective and nothing about criminal tax fraud, perjury, etc. is “intuition.” It’s usually quite black and white.

    Leonard Cohen’s daughter – not I – aopears to have told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. That was repeated by Freda Guttman to Ann Diamond. Cohen himself was very very concerned about this allegation. Perhaps Ms. Walsh should write Cohen’s daughter and admonish her.

    I don’t think I’m all that disliked in the cyber-world. The people I know who have read some of the garbage on the internet (about me) really have no idea who Cohen is and wonder why the IRS hasn’t prosecuted him yet.

    I also find Walsh’s attempts to excuse Cohen from all wrong-doing (including stealing from me) pathetic.

    Beyond that I can’t follow her insaned logic. Eminem wrote “Puke.” I dedicated it to Phil Spector’s prosecutor Pat Dixon.

    If I follow Walsh’s logic I have to conclude that it’s fine for Cohen to steal from his advisers, possibly molest his daughter (according to what Guttman said), destroy people, commit fraud and perjury (probably in Phil Spector’s matter), and if you get away with it you’re a good person. That tells me that Walsh is completely out of her mind.

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. For the record, Cohen did not plan his retirement when I worked for him until the fall of 2004. He planned to tour again. He just needs these little garbage stories for the news media: ie., Phil Spector and guns; DeMornay and the hand that rocked the cradle headlines; and, this. Of course, I know Cohen well and realize that he felt Sony gypped him when he sold them his publishing. I think the letter I have from Marty Machat to Irving Trust proves that Cohen has a pattern of “defrauding” and “stealing” from his advisers.

    P.P.S. Walsh is involved with a popularity contest from what I can tell. I’m waiting to speak to Phil Spector and will respond legally when the criminal attorney I am consulting decides I should move legally.

    fromKelley Lynch to”Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,doronweinberg ,Dennis ,”*irs. commissioner” ,ASKDOJ ,Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,Robert MacMillan ,”Lee K. Alpert” ,Thaye Dorje ,”YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,”m.j. smith” ,moseszzz@mztv.com,gail.hance@ky.gov,dbergman@bergman-law.com,”Hoffman, Rand” ,wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,lwieseltier@tnr.com,Paul Burger Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM

    State of Kentucky – Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC

    Ms. Chaney,

    I would like to know who I contact with respect to the Opinion Letter I would like from the State of Kentucky. I would appreciate you or Gail Hance’s response.There are quite a number of issues I need addressed and they include (but are certainly not limited to):

    1) The position Leonard Cohen has taken with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC. I would like to know if the State of Kentucky thinks that I was a trustee rather than owner/shareholder and, if so, who I should report “fraud” to since I would clearly have been defrauded should this be the case.

    2) Why does the State of Kentucky feel Traditional Holdings, LLC was formed in Kentucky? Leonard Cohen’s tax lawyer, Richard Westin, resides there but he is not and was not my representative, registered agent, etc.

    3) Who is receiving any notices from the State of Kentucky? Richard Westin, who appears to have made some “out of court” settlement with Cohen, refuses to communicate with me and – as the 99.5% owner of Traditional Holdings, LLC – I happen to think he may have engaged in mail fraud.

    4) If there was no business purpose what is the State of Kentucky’s position with respect to the entity itself. Why was it formed and why did it exist?

    5) Cohen has gone to great lengths to prove that he didn’t have a retirement account known as a private annuity obligation. What is the State of Kentucky’s position with respect to the fact that Cohen extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return. Richard Westin worked for Cohen and all work he did would have been on behalf of Cohen – clearly.

    6) What is the State of Kentucky’s position with respect to LC Investments, LLC? K1s were issued for that entity in Kentucky. Neither Dale Burgess, my former accountant, or I thought that was a mistake and Cohen’s adviser – Robert Kory – told mine that they intended to roll Traditional Holdings, LLC back into LC Investments, LLC.

    7) Are State taxes due? And, if so, what is the amount of the taxes together with penalties and interest. My advisers felt there were approximately $10 million in penalties & interest due with respect to Cohen’s fraud on three entities but I don’t believe they addressed state and/or local taxes.I would like an Opinion Letter on these issues and would appreciate being directed to the proper authority.Thank you.

    All the best,

    Kelley Lynch

    cc: Doron Weinberg, Esquire and Dennis Riordan, Esquire

  12. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Phawker, if I were Cohen’s lawyer I would actually contact Walsh and ask her to stop. I can assure you that this fanatical fan is not doing him any favors. In fact, I met a journalist in Montreal who was literally in shock after meeting some of his fans. Cohen refers to them as his “constituents.” And then there’s “Blogonaut’s Blog.” The man, Stephen Gianelli, is actually a lawyer. He thinks it’s just fine to contact the FBI in Oakland and lie that I have spammed the Treasury Department. In most realms this ends up with eye rolling and usually a reference to wasted taxpayer’s dollars. He even called the District Attorney’s investigator on Phil Spector’s matter, William Frayeh, to confirm that Investigator Frayeh said the prosecutor (Pat Dixon) on Phillip’s murder trial was good looking. In other words, I am dealing with nuts as my Mother pointed out. Ms. Walsh apparently does not have a life and finds this situation entertaining. My son, Rutger, just told me that he holds Leonard Cohen responsible for the loss of his fingers. Why? Because he would have been in college had Cohen, Lindsey, and others (no doubt the District Attorney) decided to target me and destroy my life. In any event, I have never seen so many liars and idiots in my life. Ms. Walsh, who lives in Denmark, thinks she can intuitively speak on behalf of federal agencies. Can you speak on behalf of Phil Spector? No she can not. I know Phil Spector and I can assure you that he’s not taking Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury lightly. No one intelligent is actually.

  13. Susanne Walsh Says:

    No matter how Kelley Lynch presents her case, no matter how talentless, pornographic and senseless she (and Phil Spector) think Leonard Cohen is, it is his talent of writing, producing and performing that has made “The Millions”. Without his talents there would be no Millions for anybody to “steal”
    Leonard Cohen’s hands may have “rocked DeMornay’s cradle” , but it seems that Ms, Lynch is biting that same hand who fed her and her family very well for many years (even if we do not consider the millions she stole from him.)
    If Kelley Lynch is not “hiding out” and has so many supporters and important “friends” (including Phil Spector) it makes one wonder why someone could not lend her a few bucks to get out of the homeless shelter and/or stay with her family.
    Leonard Cohen lives a VERY public life, everybody knows where he is and what kind of money he is making (including The IRS), believe me they will get any money owed to them, no they are not stupid.
    And oh Ms. Lynch, I do have a very good life. I do like Leonard Cohen, but I am not a “fanatic fan”. Not that it matters, I do not have a problem with Cohen Ms. Lynch does.
    Susanne Walsh

  14. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Phawker,

    Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal is not actually a fan issue. It also does not have anything to do with whether or not Cohen has talent. I personally do not believe he has talent and I happen to think he’s a plagarist who carefully studies the Bible, men like St. John of the Cross, folk songs, etc. That is my personal opinion.

    Regardless of how Cohen made money that does not give him the right to steal from people like Marty Machat, Bob Johnston, or myself. I was compensated with shares of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. (15% – all intellectual property including record contracts, book publishing, etc. were assigned to that entity and Cohen fully understand that) because 1) Cohen wanted to compensate me for my hard work over the years; and 2) Cohen didn’t feel he had fully compensated me as his personal manager for a number of years – while I worked as his personal manager. This is not an issue that Susanne Walsh can weigh in on and her logic is preposterous.

    I fed my family. I worked for a living and Leonard Cohen did not do me a favor by paying me properly for my services – as his personal manager. Walsh may have dedicated approximately 20 years of her life to Cohen for free but that wasn’t my arrangement with this man.

    Have you heard of slander laws? Walsh has not. She has no evidence, no facts, etc. I do and have filed some of that against Cohen in my Motion to Quash his absolutely outrageous and fraudulent restraining order that was an attempt to stop Ann Diamond from publishing an article with Rolling Stone about me, him, etc. and because he does not want to hand over a complete and proper forensic accounting or explain his lawyer’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter, illegal K1s, etc.

    Ms. Walsh conveniently overlooks the fact that Cohen offered me 50% community property – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers. It’s not a convenient “item” for the liars and cult victims who will not silence me – ever.

    No one has to lend me a few bucks. As the attorney I am consulting understands – Cohen owes me millions. That attorney has evidence – the same evidence I sent the IRS, DOJ, State of Kentucky, and others. This took is inconvenient for Ms. Walsh.

    I agree about this – the IRS is not stupid. I spoke to someone at the State of Kentucky who also wasn’t stupid and he told me the IRS will probably go back to 1977 or the time he obtained his first green card in the United States and the penalties and interest will be unremitting. The tax fraud follows him from adviser to adviser.

    I do not believe Ms. Walsh has a life. She is on my Blog constantly and has inserted herself into this situation. She has slandered me on Blogonaut’s Blog and the Hartford Courant’s site. I wrote the Hartford Courant and asked them to pull the slanderous comments. I intend to sue Blogonaut, Stephen Gianelli, Joff Belark, Michelle Blaine, and all the others who think it’s acceptable to lie and slander others.

    Trust me – Phil Spector would help me if he could. His ex-wife (the Mother of his children) told me (after I called her about the King Drew nightmare) to call Phillip and ask him to lend me money for a custody lawyer. He is a very dear friend of mine and Walsh cannot speak for Mr. Spector. I can say this – Phil Spector is not taking Leonard Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury lightly. It’s a deadly serious matter and Walsh is a joke.

    Kelley Lynch

  15. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, I am not in “hiding” and Susanne Walsh may want to hire an attorney. I’ll speak to Phil Spector about this issue when I am able to do so. I am tired of this woman dragging my family into this situation and telling me what she thinks my children and/or parents and sister think. In fact, I think when I sue Cohen for slander I’ll include Walsh in that suit. That’s probably the best way to handle it. It starts, as usual, with his lies and then the maniacs rush in. That would include Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut, Joff Belark, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket, Mick Brown, and the other liars all over Phil Spector’s story and mine.

    One must wonder why Cohen hasn’t asked his lawyer to rein in Walsh – particularly as Walsh has now “admitted” (publicly) that the IRS is not stupid. She has also, previously, spoken for them as have Stephen Gianelli and others. That, to me, is stupid. It’s right up there with lying to the FBI.

    Phil Spector was set up. It’s a deadly serious matter. Cohen probably perjured himself in that matter. One can assume that it is an extremely serious issue. Apparently not for Cohen – he had his advisers in touch (or visa versa) with Blogonaut who wanted to put me in touch with Cohen. Leonard Cohen, from my perspective, is a sick individual. The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office should also charge him with perjury. Then again, they probably don’t want to undermine their “witness” who showed up in their legal documents re. Phil Spector.

    Leonard Cohen does not lead a very public life. That’s a ridiculous statement. The “fanatic fan” has no idea what she’s talking about. Obviously.

    Kelley Lynch

  16. Kelly Green Says:

    Once again, Kelley Lynch has hijacked a blog! Ms. Lynch insists she has documents proving Cohen owes the IRS millions of dollars–perhaps as much as $10M. What we don’t know is when, or if, she’ll give the original documents to the IRS. Kelley, the IRS rewards “whistle blowers” with a percentage of the money recovered. Let’s say Cohen owes $10M–and let’s say the IRS would reward you with 10%–that’s $1M; however, in order for you to be a believable “whistle blower” you must let the IRS do its job–and you must quit expounding about Cohen’s alleged crimes via the internet. $1M is a lot of money, and I’m sure it would really help you and your family.

    Ms. Lynch also makes reference to Cohen offering her community property–50% of everything. How could Cohen offer her anything? She robbed him blind. She also makes reference to Cohen victimizing Marty Machat and Bob Johnston. Why haven’t we heard from their representatives? Perhaps they don’t believe they’ve been victimized.

    Ms. Lynch insists Cohen has destroyed her family–targeted her children and parents; however, it’s really Lynch who has set out to slander and destroy the life of Lorca Cohen, and yes, Ms. Lynch, it is a matter of character–YOUR character.

    On another blog, Lynch annouced she was going to law school in September. I had such high hopes for her. Unfortunately, she’s not attending law chool–but most likely went to a law school for some free advice. I cannot help but wonder if the legal advice she’s getting is from an L1–but that’s not possible. For even an L1 will tell her the case with Cohen has been litigated–it’s OVER and done with; there will be no “do over”. The courts do not allow venue shopping. In addition, Kelley Lynch owes Leonard Cohen at least $6M.

  17. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Leonard Cohen lead a public life in the sense that everybody who are interested , including the IRS, will know how to get in touch with him.
    Even if Kelley Lynch spend the rest of her life writing her perception of the “truth” on internet Forums and Blogs, the fact still remains that a court of law has determined that she stole millions of dollars from Leonard Cohen, and unless she files, and more important WIN, a suit that proves otherwise all her threats to sue Cohen and everybody who doubt her “truth” will be nothing but hot air, and all her accusations and allegations will remain lies and slander.
    I am sure Ms. Lynch is aware that she can make her Blog “private” so that only she can read it.
    Susanne Walsh

  18. Kelley Lynch Says:

    The only fact that remains about Cohen’s lawsuit is that it was bogus and entirely based on fraud and perjury. There is no law in the United States of America that permits someone to go into court, lie, commit fraud and perjury, and win. That is impossible. Furthermore, I do not believe California had jurisdiction over what is probably a federal matter (as in the IRS) or over entities that were formed in other states. Clearly, Walsh cannot address these issues and wants to overlook things like Cohen’s offer – to me – of 50% community property, etc. Walsh is well aware that I intend to file lawsuits and she should know that I have asked the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the State of Kentucky to supply me with Opinion Letters regarding the corporate structures, tax returns, tax planning, ownership interest, etc. Until I have expert opinions from authorities on this matter it would be impossible for me to respond. One cannot guess about extraordinarily complex tax issues.

    My accusations are not lies and slander and never will be – whether I go into court and discuss them, merely think about them, or write them down somewhere. They are the truth and nothing Walsh or anyone else says can change that.

    Walsh is free to read my Blog whenever she wants. Her attention to this matter is what I find bizarre. I am a stranger to her. She does not appear to know Cohen and definitely did not know him for the 20 some years I worked with him. And, she has not examined the corporate books, records, stock certificates, or evidence I have and that has been supplied to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others.

    Leonard Cohen does not lead a public life. He lives a private life and he lives a devious and deceitful life. Betsy Superfon, who was negotiating for him on my behalf (without my knowledge or consent) told me he told her this: he was remorseful, terrified, and I am the love of his life. I was not, however, his lover and Walsh can never comment on that. Furthermore, she was not at the recording sessions with Mr. Phil Spector. Hal Blaine, who has publicly noted that he never saw Mr. Spector with a gun in the studio in 37 years, Danny and David Kessel, and others were. I can assure you that Cohen was only too happy to have his daughter join me and Phillip at the Bel Air Hotel one evening and was intrigued when he heard I was meeting with Mr. Spector after the Clarkson incident. At that time, Mr. Spector told me what the forensic science concluded: Clarkson shot herself – she was dancing around in his foyer, waving a gun around, and singing “Da Doo Run Run.”

    My son Rutger emailed me yesterday. I forwarded that email to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Investigator William Frayeh, and others. He confirmed, again, that on May 25, 2005 while I was being taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector he was asked – by Steven Clark Lindsey – to go into Robert Kory’s office and sign documents relating to the transfer and/or sale of my house to Leonard Cohen. I lost custody of my son while at King Drew and Robert Kory’s Declaration was filed in that matter. Robert Kory does not and did not know my son. He met him once – when Ray witnessed a conversation (between me and Kory) with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal, missing state tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen – by Cohen, and their threats. That is obviously witness tampering, obstruction of justice, etc.

    Betsy Superfon also told me this – Cohen would have been only too happy to compensate me with my 99.5% share of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% share of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Walsh cannot address the corporate documents. Agent Bill Betzer/IRS, however, was able to determine my rightful ownership interest in these entities and that would be precisely 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. which contains all intellectual property including book publishing, recording contracts, etc. Leonard Cohen dictated the wording in the Minute books that confirmed my compensation of 15% of the intellectual property and he understood, all too well, that the transfer was “non-revocable.”

    Suzanne Walsh is a gossip who knows nothing whatsoever about what happened – in particular with respect to tax issues, corporate structures, or my compensation. Beyond that, these issues are none of her business.

    Kelley Lynch
    cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com

  19. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch is right about one thing. I do not know her, neither does anybody else she comes in contact with via her vicious slander on the internet. All we see is a disturbed woman who got cought stealing her boss’s money and did not have the stamina and courage to stay around for the law suit against her, but psstt vanished, never came up with any defense for herself, maybe because she knew there were no money left in Cohen’s account. Now she knows there are plenty of money, and NOW she wants to make a suit and “defend” herself, with a lot of imaginary accusations like tax fraud. perjurer and child molester, all gossip and speculations, which I believe is also all lies and slander, but good luck to Ms. Lynch for trying, I am convinced she will never sue anybody and will never win anything, she will just have to find a job or blame somebody else for her problems
    Susanne Walsh .

  20. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Susanne Walsh, as usual, speaks for everyone. I sincerely doubt she speaks for Phil Spector’s lawyers, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan, however and they might want to address her “intuitive” comments.

    Ms. Walsh appears to be the disturbed and obsessed individual. That is all I see when I see her posts and the emails she has sent me.

    Leonard Cohen was never my “boss.” I worked as his personal manager for nearly 18 years. I stole nothing. After receiving a tax notice relating to my 2001 tax returns I changed accountants who sent me to tax lawyers. They concluded that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and exposed me to that fraud. They advised me that a deal could not be made once fraud was brought to my attention – although the offer of 50% community property must have interested them since they were being paid.

    Susanne Walsh is well aware that I refused to participate in Cohen’s lawsuit although I was around for it and spoke to his lawyers about the fact that I was not served the suit. She apparently does not understand the legal concept of due diligence. I hardly vanished but Walsh is a drama queen from what I’ve read on the internet. She is also, clearly, a liar. The reason I refused to participate in Cohen’s lawsuit is because I went to the IRS, reported his tax fraud that I was told is criminal, and felt the lawsuit was nothing other than a desperate attempt to cover up tax fraud and criminal conduct – including Kory’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter.

    I have said the same thing for nearly five years now. No amount of money is going to change the facts or the evidence. There are corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, emails, etc. that prove my ownership interest in companies and I believe Cohen personally has proven that he defrauded me.

    With respect to the allegation of child molestation – Ms. Walsh should contact Lorca Cohen. According to Freda Guttman (and Cohen himself brought this to my attention) Lorca Cohen is the one that told classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. This pre-dated the fall of 2004 when I refused to meet with Cohen and his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, to unravel the companies they created solely for Cohen’s benefit. I have given the IRS Commissioner’s Staff the passwords to my AOL email accounts. Perhaps they’ve seen the emails between me and my former brother-in-law, Van Penick. Van is an attorney who Cohen asked me to approach about various matters including the fact that Freda Guttman told Ann Diamond the story about Lorca Cohen being molested by her father. Ann Diamond sent me an email confirming this story which I passed onto Phil Spector’s legal team, the Department of Justice, and the IRS Commissioner’s Staff.

    Susanne Walsh may believe whatever she wants to believe. It is irrelevant if she thinks I will or will not sue anyone. It is preposterous to believe that Phil Spector will not pursue the allegations that Leonard Cohen committed perjury in his grand jury. Fortunately, an attorney and friend of mine understood this – if Phillip can prove this the charges and both verdicts have to be vacated and thrown out. That’s incredibly heavy.

    It seems time for Ms. Walsh to get a job. I, at least, am part of this story. She is merely lying for no reason whatsoever – except for the probable fact that she’s some type of truly obsessive fan and not a particularly stable individual.

    Kelley Lynch

  21. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yeah, yeah. yeah The same old story from Ms. Lynch
    Sue the World and win, and we will believe her phony sob stories.
    I do have a job, I do have a home and I do have my children with me.
    I have never stolen from anybody.
    And Ms. Lynch has no idea if I have spoken with Lorca Cohen or what the truth is, she is just gossipping and slandering as usual
    Susanne Walsh

  22. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I know this. Susanne Walsh did not know Cohen for the approximately 20 years I knew and worked for him. It is shocking, to me, that Cohen and his advisers are permitting this woman go lie and gossip on the internet.

    I don’t care if Walsh has spoken to Lorca Cohen. That is not the point I intended to make. She shouldn’t lie and accuse me of raising those allegations. That was my point.

    I have never stolen from anyone and find it preposterous that Susanne Walsh thinks it is acceptable to speak for Phil Spector’s legal team – particularly when we are talking about deadly serious allegations of perjury in Phillip’s grand jury. That, of course, relates to Leonard Cohen.

    This is a game for Ms. Walsh. It probably turns her on.

    Kelley Lynch

  23. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. This is probably the only way Walsh can get close to a celebrity. Leonard Cohen himself didn’t want his “fans” showing up at his house. Walsh herself is explanation. I can just see Walsh going up to Lorca Cohen and discussing whether or not she told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her.

  24. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch is a pathetic and sad case.
    I have not lied about Cohen so why should his “legal team” object?
    Kelley Lynch has absolutely no idea who I am and who I know and how I know them, and I do not feel it is any of her bussiness.
    So I sign out now from this discussion-
    Find somebody else to abuse Ms. Lynch.
    Susanne Walsh

  25. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Because I intend to sue Leonard Cohen and will address the issues of Walsh’s harassment, cyber-terrorism, slander, etc. in that suit. I have no idea who Walsh is. She is correct about that. I do not care about her – at all. She is the one who has involved herself in my business. Susanne Walsh is a truly twisted woman. She has even emailed me when she sympathizes with me.

    If I were Cohen’s personal manager at this time – I would have already contacted Walsh. After all, I know the truth of this story and I know for a fact that Cohen is a liar, fraud, and has more than likely perjured himself in Phil Spector’s murder trial. I also think Walsh is insane for speaking on behalf of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury. It is preposterous. It is also ludicrous to assume that they are copied in on my emails for any reason other than the fact that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that is criminal; began emailing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff evidence as soon as I had an email address; and went to the Department of Justice when I realized corrupt government and corrupt law enforcement were all over this story.

    Obviously these are deadly serious issues for people other than Susanne Walsh and her pals at Blogonaut.

    I don’t think anyone should put money on the possibility that I will not litigate these issues with Cohen and others. I have asked Phil Spector to join me in my suit against the District Attorney of Los Angeles. Please see Mr. Spector’s statement below. I think he’s clear about his innocence and the fact that he views Alan Jackson as the murderer.

    I have also asked the DEA and Immigration to investigate Clarkson’s suicide. After all, in the other deaths (Anna Nicole Smith, Heath Ledger, and Michael Jackson) there wasn’t a victim. In this case, it is clear that Mr. Spector is the victim and could have been shot. Immigration, of course, should investigate the driver who changed his story 8 times and apparently perjured himself 4 times in Immigration documents. Clearly these are serious issues and one would assume that the DEA and Immigration should take them seriously – particularly as the District Attorney of Los Angeles appears to have witnessed tampered when “they” asked Immigration for a green card on behalf of DeSouza. That, to me, is unconscionable. My friend, His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, was returning to the United States while terribly ill and even on his death bed. Why? Because he was told he had to spend at least six months a year in the United States. He wanted to honor the laws of this country.

    Kelley Lynch

  26. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Immigration should also investigate how Cohen abandoned a green cardi n 1988 and why he obtained a new one in 1991. Social Security should investigate why he had more than one social security number. His former accountant, Burt Goldstein, seemed to take the IRS Commissioner’s Staff seriously.

  27. Susanne Walsh Says:

    In my first response to Kelley Lynch’s post on Phawker’s “Leonard Cohen is not a great man”, I stated that Kelley Lynch is a disturbed woman with a hateful desire for revenge on Leonard Cohen, and that she threaten every person who disagree with her, of suing them.
    If anybody have followed this thread (which I doubt), they will know I spoke the truth. and if Kelley Lynch has the ability to know the difference between truth and lies she will know it too (perhaps that is why she seems even more desperate and aggressive than usual).
    However, Ms. Lynch’s constant repeated ranting is getting boring (even as “entertainment”). Ms. Lynch is welcome to write about me (and others) and threaten to sue (laugh) whomever she wishes, and I may even read it if I am VERY bored, but I will no longer respond to her insane and incoherent rambling on this site.
    I have just one request to Ms. Lynch: PLEASE STOP sending me private E-mails.
    Susanne Walsh

  28. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Susanne Walsh cannot stop herself. This tells me that she is an unstable human being who is entertaining herself with the suffering of others. Susanne Walsh has no idea who I am. I do not know her and that is precisely why Ms. Walsh appears to me to be a dangerously unstable “fan” who has inserted herself into a situation that she knows nothing about. I have said, repeatedly, that I am suing Leonard Cohen. When I do I will raise issues having to do with the harassment I am receiving by people – such as Walsh, Blogonaut/Gianneli, Blaine, et al. – who have taken up his fraudulent cause.

    How would anyone, who has not reviewed the evidence or witnessed what I have witnessed, know if Walsh is lying or telling the truth. How would Walsh? She has spoken, on behalf of various federal agencies, based on intuition. I met with the Treasury Agencies and did what I was told – reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to Agent Luis Tejeda/IRS Fraud Unit in Los Angeles. Since everyone is so curious about the IRS and what may be pending – I intend to subopena the IRS Commissioner himself and Agent Tejeda to the witness stand to explain that. It is really quite simple. At that time, when they testify, they can explain to everyone what they have been doing and why I have been slandered in the meantime. They can also explain why my fictional sex life has become an issue. Oliver Stone himself can explain why Cohen/Kory went into Lindsey’s office – after I switched accountants, hired lawyers, and was told Cohen committed tax fraud – that I had sex with Mr. Stone.

    If I am so boring why has Ms. Walsh taken the position that she will follow me around the internet? Do you think I actually care if some nut cult victim fan doesn’t believe I intend to sue or thinks, for one moment, that Phil Spector is not going to attach Cohen’s probable perjury in his grand jury. The notion is positively deranged.

    This is the second time Walsh has stated that she won’t respond and is bowing out of the situation. She, as well as others, cannot contain or control themselves. They are obsessive maniacs.

    Ms. Walsh has received emails from me (with the IRS, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others copied in) because she continues to email me and I don’t want anyone to deny later that I didn’t bring the truth to their attention. Ms. Walsh recently contacted me to offer her sympathy for the fact that I developed a staph infection that nearly required a surgeon to amputate my foot.

    I have the ability to see right through truth and lies, slander, defamation, libel, and threats. I also happen to see right through Leonard Norman Cohen who appears to have a history of tax fraud in two countries and attempted to have Phil Spector and I take the fall for him.

    Hopefully Susanne Walsh will find another hobby to engage in. Her cyber-stalking and slander is truly nauseating.

    All the best,
    Kelley Lynch

  29. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    As usual, Kelley Lynch is calling the kettle black.

    BTW Kelley Green, Lynch owes Cohen $7.6 million PLUS annual interest thereon at the CA judgment rate of 10% per annum from the date of entry of the judgment (May of 2005) until paid. This binding and enforceable CA judgment is premised on the Cohen complaint against her alleging civil theft and mismanagement of Cohen’s estate.

    Kelley Green is correct about one thing: It is years too late for Lynch to set aside the CA judgment or to sue Cohen for anything arising out of their former business relationship.

    Kelley Lynch lives in a homeless shelter by night and blogs about ancient history (her grievances against Cohen) from the Houston Public Library by day.

    Since Lynch has family in Texas (a mother and a sister) one can draw their own conclusions as to why Lynch is living in a shelter and not with family.

    Lynch’s inability or unwillingness to move forward with her life is sad really, and I might feel sorry for her if she was not so malicious and mean spirited.

  30. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut/Gianelli, I will send your posting to the FBI – who is now copied in on my emails. I owe Cohen nothing and am waiting for Opinion Letters from the State of Kentucky and IRS. I just received one email from the State of Kentucky advising me that on the face of it I was a member of Traditional Holdings, LLC. As you probably know that does not make me a trustee. Nothing is binding about fraud, perjury, obstruction of justice, blackmail, coercion, etc. – apart from the criminal conduct that Boies Schiller felt I should record when meeting with Kory because, they felt, I was being asked to engage in criminal conduct.

    I don’t think it’s years too late for anything and until I have the facts, opinions of experts at the IRS, State of Kentucky, etc., I am not in a position to respond to Cohen’s fraud. I suppose Phil Spector is going to let go of his “ancient history” with Cohen when it is overwhelmingly apparent to me (if Mick Brown/UK Telegraph did not lie when he emailed me that Cohen testified against Mr. Spector in his grand jury) that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phillip’s grand jury. One has to be brain dead to assume that Mr. Spector will not attack that perjury – particularly given Cohen’s “pattern” of perjuring himself in court rooms around America.

    No one can draw any conclusions about why I am not living with my parents and sister – who I am in contact with – particularly some wacked out nut who has inserted himself into the Phil Spector murder trial, accused me of having sexual fantasies about a man I believe set up Phil Spector (his prosecutor – Pat Dixon), encouraged me to contact Cohen who is willing to help me, and who has lied to the FBI in Denver. Hopefully, it didn’t take Agent Wynar/FBI Oakland more than five minutes to investigate whether or not I was spamming Agent Sopko-Treasury Agent because I don’t think the FBI should have wasted more taxpayer dollars than necessary to prove that Gianelli/Blogonaut have attempted to obstruct justice and drag them into Cohen’s insane attempts to cover up what appears to be a lifetime history of tax fraud.

    Kelley Lynch

    cc: FBI Washington, IRS Commissiioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire – via email

  31. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Blogonaut/Gianelli’s “obsession” with me and my whereabouts is of great import to me. The spokesperson for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan strikes again!

  32. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Re: Kelly Green’s Garbage Post

    Have I hijacked a blog? I tend to doubt it. Publicly refuting lies is not hijacking. You, Walsh, Gianelli, Blogonaut, Blaine, Sprocket, etc., have attempted to silence me and prevent me from speaking truthfully.

    I have documents supporting my allegations that Cohen committed tax fraud. I was told, by DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess, that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud. I was told that Cohen exposed me to criminal tax fraud and I absolutely believe this. I also believe that Cohen has a lifelong history of tax fraud in the U.S. and Canada and am convinced that the IRS should review all of Cohen’s tax returns, etc., from the moment he received the 1977 tax memo telling him he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had residences – including the U.S. – but cautioning him not to have a green card. I also believe Immigration should investigate why he abandoned that green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and obtained a new green card in 1991. And, I absolutely believe the Social Security Administration should investigate his numerous social security numbers. I have provided the IRS, and others, with a tremendous amount of evidence – including corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, attorney/client privileged communications, my email passwords and authorization to review all emails in my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com accounts – and, in particular, all emails between me, Leonard Cohen, and his advisers. Richard Westin’s emails should have proved enlightening to the IRS – particularly those advising me that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a real entity with a real annuity obligation after Westin, on Cohen’s behalf, had already extinguished the annuity obligation. The IRS is obviously aware of the documents I have given them and Agent Sopko – Treasury confirmed that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading my emails. Many of those emails contained attachments (ie., evidence) including confirmation that Greenberg and Westin took the position that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” to the structure and the IRS might want to take a look at other tax issues related to Cohen. Kory himself wrote me that the IRS would demand answers, re. Cohen’s taxes, going back many years and also inquired, in writing, if I would forgive Cohen’s loans from Traditional Holdings, LLC. He also confirmed that he didn’t want to contact the IRS with respect to any of the Traditional Holdings, LLC tax returns – in case it alerted the IRS to some of the shenanigans.

    Actually, DiMascio & Berardo told me the penalties and interest on Cohen’s tax fraud as of 2004 came to approximately $10 million. They also told me similar amounts were due with respect to two other entities and the State of Kentucky thought the IRS would go back years – so, who knows, perhaps the tax hit will be enormous. I am waiting to hear back from the State of Kentucky with respect to the missing state tax returns (and “pending” taxes) that I discussed with Kory the day my son and I stopped into discuss that, Cohen’s tax fraud, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats – that I discussed with the Treasury Agents as well as my conviction that Kory’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter arose from Cohen’s tax fraud. I am also convinced it is evidence of witness tampering, etc.

    I do not view myself as a whistle blower and am not interested in any possible IRS reward as I confirmed for Agent Betzer/IRS (who is the one that told me to contact the IRS’ Fraud Unit) and the Treasury Agents. I am uninterested in receiving any type of reward for doing what I believe was the correct and legal thing to do. The IRS may be doing it’s job. Who knows what they have “pending” and I intend to doubt that Gianelli/Blogonaut is a secret IRS Agent spilling the beans. Well, since Cohen owes me millions that will ultimately help me and my family because I intend to use that to hire an attorney with. As Boies Schiller told me – inform your lawyer that Cohen owes you millions and you want them to help you take down another Hollywood fraud. Boies Schiller reviewed three large boxes of evidence that I sent them. Much of this was sent to the IRS as well. I advised Mr. Rob Watts/State of Kentucky that I would be more than happy to share anything, with him, that I sent the IRS. I’ll take my own attorney’s advice and will quit expounding about Cohen’s activities when either hell freezes over or he confesses to his wrong-doing.

    Dale Burgess, who was present when Kory offered me 50% community property on behalf of Cohen, can take the stand and explain that offer. I will explain (and have to the IRS and others) that Kory advised me (and others) that he had extraordinary negotiating powers. I didn’t rob Cohen blind and that’s why he offered me 50% community property – presumably to lie to the IRS and others and say he was defrauded by his advisers. As I’ve repeatedly stated – this is a criminal tax fraud matter and his bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials was a red herring and attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and criminal conduct.

    Marty Machat died in 1988 and may not know that he was victimized. Bob Johnston can speak for himself. I will give Mr. Johnston a copy of Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting his and Mr. Machat’s final payment for their 15% shares of Stranger Music, Inc. Steven Machat is already aware that Boies Schiller is in possession of this letter.

    Please see Freda Guttman re. her allegations (to Ann Diamond) that Lorca Cohen told her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her. It’s either true or a matter of her character. I already know she is willing to lie and perjure herself for her father. I have, after all, witnessed many things with respect to Lorca Cohen and intend to address her in my lawsuits. I a speaking the truth and I think Robert Kory’s Declaration is evidence that Cohen targeted my children. There are also allegations about Rutger that I would like Edward Johnson and Anthony Elie, and others, to address on the stand. Saba Candarsky as well as he was present for Cohen’s insanity after I refused to meet with him, hand over the corporate books and records, and unravel his creative entities and tax planning.
    Cohen has no character.

    I’ll go to law school whenever I feel like going to law school. This is clearly no one’s business. Neither is my fictional sex life but I will subpoena Oliver Stone to the witness stand. I would like to hear Mr. Stone’s position on why Cohen dragged him into this situation – by going into my young son’s father’s office and telling him that I had sex with Oliver Stone. Clearly that is not a defense to tax fraud but may prove that Cohen was a jealous and perverted man who was obsessed with me. He has lied when he said we were lovers. We were not and that allegation makes my blood curdle and skin crawl.

    I didn’t go to the law school for legal advice but I have spoken with attorneys and continue to keep a criminal attorney apprised of all the slander, etc. taking place on the internet. Actually none of the attorneys I’ve spoken with agrees that my cases with Cohen are over. I’ll leave it at that because I’ve spoken with them and now precisely what they thought. Last I heard, the Courts were under the impression that perjury was a crime so perhaps some Court will be interested in Cohen’s fraud and perjury. I believe Phil Spector will attack Cohen’s perjury in his grand jury – if Mick Brown was correct when he wrote me that Cohen testified before Phillip’s grand jury. And I believe David Moorhead who told me that Phillip had no choice but to attack that testimony. If Mr. Spector prevails (which I think is almost a sure bet) – Mr. Moorhead felt the charges would have to be vacated. That might be truly amazing.

    Kelley Lynch

  33. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Phawker,

    Please note. I will be forced to request IP information re. my “victim” and Kelly Green. This is the position the liars have put others in – including parties that respect freedom of speech.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    P.S. The IRS was copied in on my emails with Steven Machat. It certainly appeared, to me, that Steven Machat felt Cohen had stolen from his father. Bob Johnston can and should speak for himself.

  34. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what you threaten to subpoena.

    Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months to file.

    I am at the end of very only line of persons whom you threaten to sue, you have been making these threats for years, you are quite obviusly not well, and you can place your nonsense threats where the moon don’t shine, because everything I have posted here true as a matter of public record.

  35. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Nice language. My emails are not incoherent and I know this for a fact. People who are reading them have said they are quite coherent, straightforward, and easy to understand. I am not threatening to sue. I intend to sue. If you want to underestimate me – be my guest. A subpoena is not a threat and I would hope that you, as a lawyer (Blogonaut/Gianelli), would understand that this is a legal tool.

    My legal team is my business. Perhaps it would take you a taem of 10 attorneys and 10 paralegals to sort through it all. I have a very good grip on my legal issues.

    You are at the top of my list for people who I believe have obstructed justice and attempted to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen – who is willing to help me. As usuual, I merely have to lie to the IRS and others. My friend, an attorney, nailed this one early on and felt that until the IRS issued a subpoena I would be open to bribery – by Cohen, Lindsey, their legal representatives, and others. I am assuming you are Blogonaut/Gianelli who Investigator Bill Frayeh (District Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles) seemed to believe was a “shady character.” I have no idea what Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland thinks but hopefully it took him precisely 2 minutes to figure out that you lied to him when you advised him that I am spamming Agent Sopko/Treasury Department. Agent Sopko seemed like a great big girl to me. In fact, she was able to call me in California; put herself on an airplane from Washington; call me to confirm that she would meet me at Edie Lamm’s house; find Ms. Lamm’s house; have a meeting with me; email me Agent Tejeda’s information at the IRS in Los Angeles; call me back after my first contact with Agent Tejeda; and call you. That tells me that she can also read and knows precisely why I am writing her. I have said it countless times: I am documenting the destruction of my life for the IRS and others since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS. I know to arrogant idiots the sum of $30 million is nothing but in the real world it’s huge. People are telling me precisely how corrupt they think Los Angeles is and everyone I’ve spoken with believes Phil Spector was framed and Leonard Cohen, if he did appear in Phillip’s grand jury – as Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me, should be held responsible for that perjury. They think I was dragged to Killer King (and the entire file is falsified) to 1) determine what else I knew about Phil Spector; and 2) to prevent me from serving as a credible witness for the IRS and other agencies.

    As I have also stated I am waiting for the IRS and State of Kentucky to issue Opinion Letters. When they do and I am clear about their position on these companies and the fraud, I will proceed to litigate my issues with Leonard Cohen.

    I have not threatened you. I believe the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI should investigate and charge you – if you are indeed Gianelli/Blogonaut. I also believe they should investigate why Joff Belark targeted me, lied about me, and targeted my son who is also a witnes.

    I am very well. You, however, are a moron. Every word I have uttered and written is the truth. Every word you have uttered, and written, is a lie. Hire 10 lawyers and 100 paralegals and get their consensus on fraud, slander, defamation, libel, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness retaliation, and whatever the hell it means when you align yourself with “Prosecutor Alan Jackson” who probably has “motive” to undermine me “as a witness.”

    Please do not speak for the IRS, DOJ, Department of Justice, and/or FBI unless you write me at odzerchenma3@gmail.com on official letterhead. For the record, I know for a fact that you do not speak for Phil Spector or his legal team. That would include Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan who have must think you are an absolutely wacked out deranged nut. I know that’s what my Mother thinks. She also thinks Bruce Cutler nailed you.

    Kelley Lynch
    cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com

    cc: IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury, the FBI, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire

    NOTE: I’ll send this to you Gianelli/Blogonaut via email with the above individuals/agencies copied in. They can read for themselves that you don’t give a “rat’s ass” that they’re copied in. I would imagine that they already figured this out.

  36. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch

    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    “attorney. general” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    becknerm ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    michelleblaine@gmail.com,
    sprocket.trials@gmail.com,

    Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM

    Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    The individual who doesn’t give a rat’s ass would need 10 attorneys and 10 paralegals to sort through this. That’s fairly clear to me. How about you? It can’t figure out that every word I have uttered and written is the truth and is standing on lies that I intend to attack in court. It speaks for my sister and brother-in-law, and Rutger, who are copied in on this email. It feels comfortable threatening me and slandering me and upsetting my children. That’s all I need to know about “it.” I think Agent Wynar/FBI, if he is intelligent at all, can figure out that I did not “spam” Agent Sopko/Treasury. I know if I was a Special Agent with the FBI it would have taken me one email or one phone call. And, if I were you, I would know that it doesn’t have the authority – legal or otherwise – to speak for Phil Spector or you.

    Thank you.

    Love,
    Kelley

    – Hide quoted text –
    On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Sopko, and the FBI,

    I want you to understand that “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” (self-proclaimed liar, actually, who is – no doubt the man who sounds like he crawled out of a crypt: Gianelli/Blogonaut) is stating, unequivocally, that “nobody gives a rat’s ass who” I “copy in” on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS.

    It seemed, from my conversation with Agent Sopko and her partner, that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading my emails. In fact, I was told that many people were reading them. Yes, it seems to be complicated but I have faith that intelligent people in federal agencies can figure out what ordinary folks are able to understand: that Leonard Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, appears to have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s matter, and the District Attorney probably had the power and motive to take me to Killer King. Chris at Homeland Security certainly seemed to understand that the District Attorney and/or the Govenor’s Office could conceivably be involved with much of what was taking place.

    Blogonaut/Gianelli, if they wrote the posting below, should not be at the bottom of anyone’s list. It appears to be connected, somehow, to Phil Spector’s prosecutor; lied to the FBI; and actually called Investigator William Frayeh. He publicly stated that he was in touch with Cohen’s legal team and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is willing to help me. All I have to do, apparently, to get my life and children back is lie. That’s precisely what Mark Smith, my friend who is a Securities lawyer, told me. He didn’t think my story was incoherent but he did think Cohen, et al., would attempt to bribe me further.

    Everything the individual writes about me is a lie so that says something about its intelligence. It has none. Anyway, I have already stated that I believe “it” should be investigated and don’t feel the need to repeat that ad nauseum. Either the IRS, and other agencies (ie., Agent Wynar who does indeed have my sympathethies if he had to talk to this crackhead from “The Crypt”), get it or they don’t. It’s that simple. The arrogance is inconceivable. So is the stupidity. Let’s revisit Yongzin Rinpoche’s conclusion about what has gone down here and why: arrogance, greed, and – of course, stupidity.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    “Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what you threaten to subpoena.

    Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months to file.
    I am at the end of very only line of persons whom you threaten to sue, you have been making these threats for years, you are quite obviusly not well, and you can place your nonsense threats where the moon don’t shine, because everything I have posted here true as a matter of public record.”

    fromKelley Lynch
    todoronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
    Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM

    Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    November 16th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    Nobody gives a rat’s ass who you “copy in” on your incoherent rant emails or what you threaten to do, who you threaten to sue, and what
    you threaten to subpoena.

    Indeed, for you to carry through with your 2008 threats alone would take a team of 10 paralegals and 10 attorneys several months to file.
    I am at the end of very only line of persons whom you threaten to sue, you have been making these threats for years, you are quite obviusly not well, and you can place your nonsense threats where the moon don’t shine, because everything I have posted here true as a matter of public record.

    Kelley Lynch Says:

    November 17th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Nice language. My emails are not incoherent and I know this for a fact. People who are reading them have said they are quite coherent, straightforward, and easy to understand. I am not threatening to sue. I intend to sue. If you want to underestimate me – be my guest. A subpoena is not a threat and I would hope that you, as a lawyer (Blogonaut/Gianelli), would understand that this is a legal tool.

    My legal team is my business. Perhaps it would take you a taem of 10 attorneys and 10 paralegals to sort through it all. I have a very good grip on my legal issues.

    You are at the top of my list for people who I believe have obstructed justice and attempted to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen – who is willing to help me. As usuual, I merely have to lie to the IRS and others. My friend, an attorney, nailed this one early on and felt that until the IRS issued a subpoena I would be open to bribery – by Cohen, Lindsey, their legal representatives, and others. I am assuming you are Blogonaut/Gianelli who Investigator Bill Frayeh (District Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles) seemed to believe was a “shady character.” I have no idea what Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland thinks but hopefully it took him precisely 2 minutes to figure out that you lied to him when you advised him that I am spamming Agent Sopko/Treasury Department. Agent Sopko seemed like a great big girl to me. In fact, she was able to call me in California; put herself on an airplane from Washington; call me to confirm that she would meet me at Edie Lamm’s house; find Ms. Lamm’s house; have a meeting with me; email me Agent Tejeda’s information at the IRS in Los Angeles; call me back after my first contact with Agent Tejeda; and call you. That tells me that she can also read and knows precisely why I am writing her. I have said it countless times: I am documenting the destruction of my life for the IRS and others since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS. I know to arrogant idiots the sum of $30 million is nothing but in the real world it’s huge. People are telling me precisely how corrupt they think Los Angeles is and everyone I’ve spoken with believes Phil Spector was framed and Leonard Cohen, if he did appear in Phillip’s grand jury – as Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me, should be held responsible for that perjury. They think I was dragged to Killer King (and the entire file is falsified) to 1) determine what else I knew about Phil Spector; and 2) to prevent me from serving as a credible witness for the IRS and other agencies.

    As I have also stated I am waiting for the IRS and State of Kentucky to issue Opinion Letters. When they do and I am clear about their position on these companies and the fraud, I will proceed to litigate my issues with Leonard Cohen.

    I have not threatened you. I believe the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI should investigate and charge you – if you are indeed Gianelli/Blogonaut. I also believe they should investigate why Joff Belark targeted me, lied about me, and targeted my son who is also a witnes.

    I am very well. You, however, are a moron. Every word I have uttered and written is the truth. Every word you have uttered, and written, is a lie. Hire 10 lawyers and 100 paralegals and get their consensus on fraud, slander, defamation, libel, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness retaliation, and whatever the hell it means when you align yourself with “Prosecutor Alan Jackson” who probably has “motive” to undermine me “as a witness.”

    Please do not speak for the IRS, DOJ, Department of Justice, and/or FBI unless you write me at odzerchenma3@gmail.com on official letterhead. For the record, I know for a fact that you do not speak for Phil Spector or his legal team. That would include Bruce Cutler,

    Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan who must think you are an absolutely wacked out deranged nut. I know that’s what my Mother thinks. She also thinks Bruce Cutler nailed you.

    Kelley Lynch
    cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com

    cc: IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury, the FBI, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire

    NOTE: I’ll send this to you Gianelli/Blogonaut via email with the above individuals/agencies copied in. They can read for themselves that you don’t give a “rat’s ass” that they’re copied in. I would imagine that they already figured this out.

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-210610

  37. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    You have been threating to sue your “enimies” (including Cohen) since at least or May of 2005.

    It is quite obvious that you are all show and no go.

    You live in a homeless shelter, and not with your mother or sister who live close by in Texas.

    It is also obvious from your writings that you are mired in the past and cannot move on.

    Sue or don’t sue.

    But until then, please STFU.

    We all know that if your were going to sue Cohen or others you would have done so already.

    No one cares about you any more.

  38. Kelly Green Says:

    Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?

    Now you’ve decided Blogonaut/Gianelli is attacking you on this blog. Let’s be real, Gianelli’s brave enough to use his actual name—he doesn’t have to hide behind a fictional identity. And you’ve sent how many emails to the IRS, FBI, etc, claiming he’s being “mean” to you. Once again, you have no proof it’s Gianelli. Nonetheless, you want the IRS, FBI, etc, investigating Gianelli because “another victim” said something you didn’t like; therefore, it must be Gianelli’s fault.

    You continue to attack Lorca Cohen, yet your children remain off-limits. You also make reference to a draft article by Anne Diamond–please provide a citation for Diamond’s published article. You often refer readers to various incantations of your blogs where the reader can peruse Diamond’s article. The problem is that you’re the one who posts the article and the only person who can edit the article is you. One citation to Diamond’s published article, on a website other than yours or a web entry other than one of your many nics, will suffice.

    You also make reference to attornies telling you Cohen exposed you to criminal tax fraud. Are you under investigation or criminal indictment by the IRS, FBI, DOJ, homeland security…? Do you intend to “flip” on Cohen for a lighter sentence? Or do you intend to plead guilty and accept the fines and serve a prison sentence? In other words, if Cohen doesn’t go to prison then, the odds are, neither will you. I’m sure somewhere in your mind you’ll twist this into a bribe; afterall, Kelley, everything’s a bribe to you.

  39. Susanne Walsh Says:

    As far as I can see the only “truth” spoken by Kelley Lynch is that “I can’t help myself”. I just have a few more things to say in this debate, although Kelly Green really said it all very clear and precise.
    It seems Ms. Lynch is getting more and more irrational, abusive and desperate, probably because nobody gives her any attention anymore, blogs and forums obviously refuse to print her lies and slander and therefore nobody respond to her outrageous outbursts, which again means her life is now completely emty.
    Kelley Lynch accuses Leonard Cohen of being a pervert for writing erotic lyrics, That is not perverted, but writing on public internet sites mean and cruel gossip about a young woman (just because she hates her Father), keep on bringing up alleged “accusations” of she herself having sex with different famous men (i.e. Steven Segal and Oliver Stone), and her sexual fantasies about high profile lawers, that Ms. Lynch is perverted and sick, and NO I am NOT speaking for any of these men, but I would imagine that all of them (including Cohen) would prefer a “Hiroshima” to have any kind of relationship with Ms. Lynch.
    Kelley Lynch is “Threatening” to sue hundreds of people from Leonard Cohen, several investigators down to ordinary bloggers who disagree with her lies, her reason for that is that “we” are trying to obstruct justice and make her look “not credible”. Here are a few different reasons to why Kelley Lynch does not appear credible:
    Leonard Cohen commited tax fraud “That I was told is criminal”
    “(Some) Investigators are criminal assholes”
    Cohen has “probably” commited perjury in Phil Spector trial
    Cohen has “Probably” molested his child
    Male bloggers who objects to her lies are “possible” gay
    Female bloggers are “obsessive cult fans”
    It is Cohens fault that she lives in a homeless shelter and that her son lost his finger.
    “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is “probably” identical with Gianelli/Blogonaut.

    All these and many more speculative “enemies” are being slandered and abused by Ms. Lynch.
    Ms. Lynch has previously stated that “if she was Leonard Cohen’s legal advisor, she would ask me to stop defending him, since I am not helping him”. Well, Leonard Cohen does not need my defense or help to show the world how he is as a person, a writer, a performer, a Father, a friend and an employer. His loyal family, friends, band members, critics and fans speaks clearly of that. However, if I was Phil Spector’s advisor I would clearly advise Ms. Lynch to stop “defending” him and claiming to be his “dear friend”, if we are to believe the old saying “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”, and if Phil Spector’s credibility is equal to Ms. Lynch’s it just does not look good for poor old Phil.
    Susanne Walsh

  40. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    Well said Kelly G. and Susanne W.

    After 5 years of KL threatening to sue anyone who dares disagree with her, she has become quite boring.

    I have no doubt that 5 years from now KL with still be ranting about being in the verge of suing Leonard Cohen and others just has she asserted in 2005 when Cohen first obtained his $7,000,000.00 judgment against her.

    It is almost 2010–the 5 year anniversary of KL’s empty threat to sue Cohen and have him prosecuted by the IRS and others.

    According to KL there is always something that needs to happen before KL actually files suit. For almost two years she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler”. Then she was waiting to hear from Spector’s legal team. Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)

    Don’t go away mad KL, just go away.

  41. Kelley Lynch Says:

    If I’ve become so boring why are you following me around the internet and defending someone like Leonard Cohen?

    I have made no threat to have Cohen prosecuted by the IRS. I do not work for the IRS and I do not command the IRS around – nor do I speak for the IRS, DOJ, Treasury or the FBI. I also don’t draw conclusions, without facts, about what they are doing, aren’t doing, or what they consider a pending matter or criminal conduct. I reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud to the IRS. I contacted the FBI because activity was crossing state borders and, from what I have witnessed, it is official misconduct involving government, law enforcement, and – of course, Leonard Cohen and others. I contacted the DOJ when I realized law enforcement was playing games with me. That’s a direct quote – from law enforcement. Agent Kelly Sopko/Treasury Department contacted me and we met. I contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS in Los Angeles and reported Cohen’s tax fraud to him. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff – and others – with a tremendous amount of evidence relating to Cohen’s tax fraud, social security numbers, off-shore accounts, 1977 tax memo advising him that he didn’t have to pay taxes anywhere – but cautioning him not to have a green card, his abandoned green card, his various social security numbers, and – of course – his disdain for ordinary income taxes and these sham corporations. The IRS advised me that Cohen issued illegal K1s to me from LC Investments, LLC.

    I am not waiting for Bruce Cutler and I think your call to Bruce Cutler was a desperate attempt to determine whether or not Bruce Cutler is still involved with Phil Spector. I am not waiting to hear from Phil Spector’s legal team. I am copying Phil Spector’s legal team in on my emails – together with quite a number of government agencies and others.

    I actually have spoken with numerous people in the State of Kentucky – including Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet and Mr. Rob Watts – Fraud/State of Kentucky who asked me to put my complaint in writing because these issues are complex. I recently received an email from the State of Kentucky directing me to the appropriate parties regarding some of my allegations. The IRS, not Blogonaut-Gianelli, will advise me – in the Opinion Letter I have requested – whether or not Traditional Holdings, LLC is a “long defunct business entity” or a sham company meant to deceive the IRS in order for Leonard Cohen to avoid paying ordinary income taxes.

    Blogonaut-Gianelli, lying to the FBI is a crime and everyone has figured out that I am not spamming the Treasury. This really does provoke eye-rolling and, of course, comments about wasting taxpayer’s dollars. Agent Wynar, of course, should have been able to figure this out and he does indeed have my sympathies because you sound like you crawled out of a crypt. I can assure you, knowing Phil Spector, that he will want to know why you called Bruce Cutler about me, why you have lied to the FBI about me, why you have gone to such lengths to undermine my credibility and slander me, why you contacted Investigator Frayeh (an investigator on his matter) about me, why you were in touch with Cohen’s legal advisers and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who was (according to you) apparently willing to help me – all I had to do was lie (as usual – I have already turned down Cohen’s offer of 50% community property, etc.), and why you are all over his matter.

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. Everything Walsh says is gratuitous and I am convinced that she is an unstable cult victim of Leonard Cohen’s and seeks his attention.

  42. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch to”*irs. commissioner” ,attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,”Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,ASKDOJ ,Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,Blogonaut Law-Blog ,STEPHEN GIANELLI ,Joff Belark ,doronweinberg ,Dennis ,Thaye Dorje ,”YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,Robert MacMillan ,”Lee K. Alpert” ,Teresa Low ,PIU ,MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,Governor.ritter@state.co.us,governor@governor.ca.gov,”attorney. general” ,stan.garnett@gmail.com,gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,becknerm ,”Hank, Larry” ,”John Hall, Chief of Police” ,”m.j. smith” ,moseszzz@mztv.com,Duane ,”Hoffman, Rand” ,lwieseltier@tnr.com,mayor@cityofhouston.net,Mick Brown

    Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21 AM

    Mick Brown – UK Telegraph

    Hello Mick,

    People seem to think you’re a liar. Cohen even shows up in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine. Anyway, “Kelly Green” is obviously not a brain surgeon.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says: November 18th, 2009 at 3:14 am Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-211011

  43. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown

    Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM

    Hello Colleen,

    John Maunts and Rob Watts did not sound like complete idiots – as Blogonaut/Gianelli appears to be suggesting. I am awaiting an Opinion Letter from the State of Kentucky and the IRS. I suppose you can commit criminal tax fraud in the State of Kentucky if the company is now defunct. The company was administratively dissolved and, in a Special Meeting I called (properly notifying Cohen as an attorney advised me to do), it is dissolved. I also filed final returns with the IRS so nothing else could be done in my name. But that doesn’t address the illegal K1s issued – by LC Investments, LLC – in the State of Kentucky and other questions.

    Perhaps the State of Kentucky would like to explain the comments – below. It seems to indicate that committing tax fraud, not filing state tax returns, defrauding the State of Kentucky, committing mail fraud, having no business purpose, issuing illegal K1s, etc. is just fine – in Kentucky. Anyway, this is a game for these individuals and Gianelli/Blogonaut has lied to the FBI, inserted himself into Cohen’s tax fraud and the Phil Spector matter, and seems highly unstable – to me.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-211019

  44. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    As far as I have been able to ascertain, the Kentucky Department of Revenue does not issue advisory tax opinions. If it did, the requesting party would have to be directly involved in an actual, current (prospective) tax situation. If the opinion then issued, the persons directly involved in that tax situation could then rely on the opinion going forward. And if it did, the opinion would be requested through tax professionals from the Kentucky Department of Revenue (not the Secretary of State).

    Even where advisory tax opinions can be requested, the agency is under no obligation to issue one.

    No taxing authority issues advisory opinions about the alleged past tax fraud of others concerning long defunct business entities. That is not what they are for.

    Advisory tax opinions, when issued, are for the purpose of providing guidance to a tax payer who is facing a specific tax situation, going forward. They are not binding on the issuing agency but may protect a party who relies on it from the later assessment of penalties. They are not issued years after a transaction so an obsessed blogger can post them with an “I told you so” comment or about a celebrity’s tax matters to facilitate dogging that celebrity on the internet.

    Therefore, if Kelley Lynch is waiting for a “tax opinion” from the State of Kentucky or the IRS regarding one or more Cohen related entities that no longer exist; it is going to be a longer wait than when she was waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler. Because it is NEVER going to happen.

    And no KL, this does not mean that people can commit tax fraud. It just means that YOU cannot obtain tax opinions from the IRS or the Kentucky Department of Revenue regarding your allegations of past tax fraud.

    That is all.

  45. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Setting the record straight:

    fromKelley Lynch
    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com

    Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:08 AM

    Doron Weinberg, Esquire and Dennis Riordan, Esquire

    Good Morning Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Blogonaut/Gianelli cannot control himself/itself. This is a game for him and he thinks lying to the FBI, contacting Bruce Cutler and Investigator Frayeh, and slandering me is not problematic. He is wrong. These are very sick, sadistic, twisted and unstable people who have targeted my children.

    Love,
    Kelley

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 11:59 am
    If I’ve become so boring why are you following me around the internet and defending someone like Leonard Cohen?
    I have made no threat to have Cohen prosecuted by the IRS. I do not work for the IRS and I do not command the IRS around – nor do I speak for the IRS, DOJ, Treasury or the FBI. I also don’t draw conclusions, without facts, about what they are doing, aren’t doing, or what they consider a pending matter or criminal conduct. I reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud to the IRS. I contacted the FBI because activity was crossing state borders and, from what I have witnessed, it is official misconduct involving government, law enforcement, and – of course, Leonard Cohen and others. I contacted the DOJ when I realized law enforcement was playing games with me. That’s a direct quote – from law enforcement. Agent Kelly Sopko/Treasury Department contacted me and we met. I contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS in Los Angeles and reported Cohen’s tax fraud to him. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff – and others – with a tremendous amount of evidence relating to Cohen’s tax fraud, social security numbers, off-shore accounts, 1977 tax memo advising him that he didn’t have to pay taxes anywhere – but cautioning him not to have a green card, his abandoned green card, his various social security numbers, and – of course – his disdain for ordinary income taxes and these sham corporations. The IRS advised me that Cohen issued illegal K1s to me from LC Investments, LLC.
    I am not waiting for Bruce Cutler and I think your call to Bruce Cutler was a desperate attempt to determine whether or not Bruce Cutler is still involved with Phil Spector. I am not waiting to hear from Phil Spector’s legal team. I am copying Phil Spector’s legal team in on my emails – together with quite a number of government agencies and others.
    I actually have spoken with numerous people in the State of Kentucky – including Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet and Mr. Rob Watts – Fraud/State of Kentucky who asked me to put my complaint in writing because these issues are complex. I recently received an email from the State of Kentucky directing me to the appropriate parties regarding some of my allegations. The IRS, not Blogonaut-Gianelli, will advise me – in the Opinion Letter I have requested – whether or not Traditional Holdings, LLC is a “long defunct business entity” or a sham company meant to deceive the IRS in order for Leonard Cohen to avoid paying ordinary income taxes.
    Blogonaut-Gianelli, lying to the FBI is a crime and everyone has figured out that I am not spamming the Treasury. This really does provoke eye-rolling and, of course, comments about wasting taxpayer’s dollars. Agent Wynar, of course, should have been able to figure this out and he does indeed have my sympathies because you sound like you crawled out of a crypt. I can assure you, knowing Phil Spector, that he will want to know why you called Bruce Cutler about me, why you have lied to the FBI about me, why you have gone to such lengths to undermine my credibility and slander me, why you contacted Investigator Frayeh (an investigator on his matter) about me, why you were in touch with Cohen’s legal advisers and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who was (according to you) apparently willing to help me – all I had to do was lie (as usual – I have already turned down Cohen’s offer of 50% community property, etc.), and why you are all over his matter.
    Kelley Lynch
    P.S. Everything Walsh says is gratuitous and I am convinced that she is an unstable cult victim of Leonard Cohen’s and seeks his attention.

    Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 11:44 am
    Well said Kelly G. and Susanne W.
    After 5 years of KL threatening to sue anyone who dares disagree with her, she has become quite boring.
    I have no doubt that 5 years from now KL with still be ranting about being in the verge of suing Leonard Cohen and others just has she asserted in 2005 when Cohen first obtained his $7,000,000.00 judgment against her.
    It is almost 2010–the 5 year anniversary of KL’s empty threat to sue Cohen and have him prosecuted by the IRS and others.
    According to KL there is always something that needs to happen before KL actually files suit. For almost two years she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler”. Then she was waiting to hear from Spector’s legal team. Now KL is waiting to receive a tax opinion from the State of Kentucky about a long defunct business entity with whom she no longer has any connection that she requested by leaving an e-mail message for the Kentucky Secretary of State through a public website. (I am sure Kentucky is getting right on that!)
    Don’t go away mad KL, just go away.
    Kelly Green Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 3:14 am
    Let’s see: now you’re saying Leonard Cohen MAY have testified during Phil Spector’s grand jury hearing. You don’t have proof that he did? You can’t provide one citation that Cohen testified? You want Spector’s legal team to use Cohen’s “perjured” testimony in Spector’s appeal? And your, “well, maybe, but I’m not really sure Cohen even testified—but if Cohen would have testified he would have offered “perjured” testimony; therefore, based on Cohen’s potential “perjured” testimony the state of California should spring Spector from prison.” Are you serious?
    Now you’ve decided Blogonaut/Gianelli is attacking you on this blog. Let’s be real, Gianelli’s brave enough to use his actual name—he doesn’t have to hide behind a fictional identity. And you’ve sent how many emails to the IRS, FBI, etc, claiming he’s being “mean” to you. Once again, you have no proof it’s Gianelli. Nonetheless, you want the IRS, FBI, etc, investigating Gianelli because “another victim” said something you didn’t like; therefore, it must be Gianelli’s fault.
    You continue to attack Lorca Cohen, yet your children remain off-limits. You also make reference to a draft article by Anne Diamond–please provide a citation for Diamond’s published article. You often refer readers to various incantations of your blogs where the reader can peruse Diamond’s article. The problem is that you’re the one who posts the article and the only person who can edit the article is you. One citation to Diamond’s published article, on a website other than yours or a web entry other than one of your many nics, will suffice.
    You also make reference to attornies telling you Cohen exposed you to criminal tax fraud. Are you under investigation or criminal indictment by the IRS, FBI, DOJ, homeland security…? Do you intend to “flip” on Cohen for a lighter sentence? Or do you intend to plead guilty and accept the fines and serve a prison sentence? In other words, if Cohen doesn’t go to prison then, the odds are, neither will you. I’m sure somewhere in your mind you’ll twist this into a bribe; afterall, Kelley, everything’s a bribe to you.
    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 9:23 am
    As far as I can see the only “truth” spoken by Kelley Lynch is that “I can’t help myself”. I just have a few more things to say in this debate, although Kelly Green really said it all very clear and precise.
    It seems Ms. Lynch is getting more and more irrational, abusive and desperate, probably because nobody gives her any attention anymore, blogs and forums obviously refuse to print her lies and slander and therefore nobody respond to her outrageous outbursts, which again means her life is now completely emty.
    Kelley Lynch accuses Leonard Cohen of being a pervert for writing erotic lyrics, That is not perverted, but writing on public internet sites mean and cruel gossip about a young woman (just because she hates her Father), keep on bringing up alleged “accusations” of she herself having sex with different famous men (i.e. Steven Segal and Oliver Stone), and her sexual fantasies about high profile lawers, that Ms. Lynch is perverted and sick, and NO I am NOT speaking for any of these men, but I would imagine that all of them (including Cohen) would prefer a “Hiroshima” to have any kind of relationship with Ms. Lynch.
    Kelley Lynch is “Threatening” to sue hundreds of people from Leonard Cohen, several investigators down to ordinary bloggers who disagree with her lies, her reason for that is that “we” are trying to obstruct justice and make her look “not credible”. Here are a few different reasons to why Kelley Lynch does not appear credible:
    Leonard Cohen commited tax fraud “That I was told is criminal”
    “(Some) Investigators are criminal assholes”
    Cohen has “probably” commited perjury in Phil Spector trial
    Cohen has “Probably” molested his child
    Male bloggers who objects to her lies are “possible” gay
    Female bloggers are “obsessive cult fans”
    It is Cohens fault that she lives in a homeless shelter and that her son lost his finger.
    “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is “probably” identical with Gianelli/Blogonaut.
    All these and many more speculative “enemies” are being slandered and abused by Ms. Lynch.
    Ms. Lynch has previously stated that “if she was Leonard Cohen’s legal advisor, she would ask me to stop defending him, since I am not helping him”. Well, Leonard Cohen does not need my defense or help to show the world how he is as a person, a writer, a performer, a Father, a friend and an employer. His loyal family, friends, band members, critics and fans speaks clearly of that. However, if I was Phil Spector’s advisor I would clearly advise Ms. Lynch to stop “defending” him and claiming to be his “dear friend”, if we are to believe the old saying “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”, and if Phil Spector’s credibility is equal to Ms. Lynch’s it just does not look good for poor old Phil.
    Susanne Walsh\

    Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Here are my comments re. Susanne Walsh’s latest round of insane rants, for the record.

    Love,
    Kelley

    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    As far as I can see the only “truth” spoken by Kelley Lynch is that “I can’t help myself”. I just have a few more things to say in this debate, although Kelly Green really said it all very clear and precise.

    It seems Ms. Lynch is getting more and more irrational, abusive and desperate, probably because nobody gives her any attention anymore, blogs and forums obviously refuse to print her lies and slander and therefore nobody respond to her outrageous outbursts, which again means her life is now completely emty.

    Clearly Walsh – Cohen’s obvious cult victim and #1 fan – is becoming frustrated because their attempts to silence me are not working. Of course, this woman does not know me, has not reviewed the evidence, has not witnessed what I’ve witnessed, and did not know Cohen for the entire 20 years I worked with him. She probably hopes this is a way to ingratiate herself with him – which is truly pathetic.

    Kelley Lynch accuses Leonard Cohen of being a pervert for writing erotic lyrics,

    It’s interesting to note, at this point, that a young woman who Cohen hired from Kelly Services felt she was being asked to read “porn” when we were working on Stranger Music (the book). Phillip told me he couldn’t stand Cohen’s porn lyrics. Paul Burger pointed out that Cohen’s psalms were cold.

    That is not perverted, but writing on public internet sites mean and cruel gossip about a young woman (just because she hates her Father),

    I have no idea if Lorca Cohen hates her father and I have never made that allegation. Walsh seemed to indicate that she addressed this issue with Lorca Cohen. The appropriate party to address Lorca Cohen’s allegations with is Freda Guttman.

    keep on bringing up alleged “accusations” of she herself having sex with different famous men (i.e. Steven Segal and Oliver Stone),

    I have never been accused, from what I can tell, of having sex with Steven Segal. I was accused – by Cohen (went he went into my young son’s father’s office with Kory) of having sex with Oliver Stone. Oliver Stone personally should address that allegation and may wonder why he has been dragged into this insanity.

    and her sexual fantasies about high profile lawers, that Ms. Lynch is perverted and sick, and NO I am NOT speaking for any of these men, but I would imagine that all of them (including Cohen) would prefer a “Hiroshima” to have any kind of relationship with Ms. Lynch.

    Cohen’s the one that has lied to the news media by telling them that we were lovers so clearly he likes that idea – although it’s a lie.

    Kelley Lynch is “Threatening” to sue hundreds of people from Leonard Cohen, several investigators down to ordinary bloggers who disagree with her lies, her reason for that is that “we” are trying to obstruct justice and make her look “not credible”.

    I have no intention of suing ordinary bloggers. That’s preposterous.
    Here are a few different reasons to why Kelley Lynch does not appear credible:
    Leonard Cohen commited tax fraud “That I was told is criminal”

    Only the IRS and State of Kentucky know if the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud are credible – Walsh clearly does not.

    “(Some) Investigators are criminal assholes”

    I have no doubt that this is true. Perhaps Phil Spector would like to weigh in on this issue.

    Cohen has “probably” commited perjury in Phil Spector trial

    The detectives Steve Cron and I met at Cohen’s house should be called to the witness stand to “discuss” the fact that Cohen told them his comments to the news media, over the years, about Phil Spector were good rock ‘n roll comments. Cohen definitely appears in the prosecutor’s Motion in Limine. I have no idea why Mick Brown would lie and tell me that Cohen testified against Phillip in his grand jury but I know this – I worked with Cohen for approximately 20 years and he never once told me that Phillip held a gun on him. He definitely told me that he hated his vocals. I know how seriously he takes his vocals – particularly if someone “drowns” them in the production.

    Cohen has “Probably” molested his child

    See Freda Guttman.

    Male bloggers who objects to her lies are “possible” gay

    Gratuitous and stupid.

    Female bloggers are “obsessive cult fans”

    I was referring to Walsh personally. She appears to be an obsessive cult “victim” attempting to impress Cohen. Who knows, however, she may just be deranged.
    It is Cohens fault that she lives in a homeless shelter and that her son lost his finger.

    Rutger and I agree on this one. Lindsey has liability as well.

    “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is “probably” identical with Gianelli/Blogonaut.

    That can be determined via a subpoena. I thought Gianelli/Blogonaut was being brave and publicly posting about me. It’s now hiding behind a screen name?
    All these and many more speculative “enemies” are being slandered and abused by Ms. Lynch.

    Ms. Lynch has previously stated that “if she was Leonard Cohen’s legal advisor, she would ask me to stop defending him, since I am not helping him”.

    True understatement. I also would have advised him to go into the IRS with me – if he really was defrauded by his advisers.

    Well, Leonard Cohen does not need my defense or help to show the world how he is as a person, a writer, a performer, a Father, a friend and an employer. His loyal family, friends, band members, critics and fans speaks clearly of that.
    Especially his family members, girlfriend, and friends who are on his payroll.
    However, if I was Phil Spector’s advisor I would clearly advise Ms. Lynch to stop “defending” him and claiming to be his “dear friend”, if we are to believe the old saying “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”, and if Phil Spector’s credibility is equal to Ms. Lynch’s it just does not look good for poor old Phil.

    Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan, heed Walsh’s advice at your own risk. She now feels sorry for “poor old Phil” apparently. The woman is clearly nuts.

    Susanne Walsh

    For the record.

  46. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch

    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    susanne walsh

    Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM

    Hello Rinpoche,

    Since you’re Steven Segal’s teacher and my friend I think you are well aware that I never had sex with Steven either. My sex life is truly fascinating for these maniacs – fictional but fascinating. Who knows – maybe Steven himself would like to address this particular issue.

    Thank you, Rinpoche.

    Love,
    Kelley

  47. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    KL loves to post her emails to others and to drop the names of celebrities (Phil Spector, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone) but she has never posted a reply from ANY of these persons to a single email by her–including to her many emails to “Rinpoche”, who she describes as “Steven Segal’s friend and teacher”.

    Are these letter from KL to others, famous and otherwise (that are never replied to), supposed to persuade the world that all of these people support her?

    Because we all know different.

    If KL’s blog posts are any guide, the closest KL has come to an actual reply from anyone except Maurice the homeless guy from Santa Monica is the auto reply she received following her (unanswered) email to Anderson Cooper–which computer generated auto reply KL posted on her blog like it was confirmation of something.

    Of course, KL is free to prove all of us wrong by posting a recent reply from Phil Spector, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone, or even “Rinpoche”. But don’t hold your breath.

    As with the opinion letters KL is awaiting from the IRS and the Kentucky Secretary of State it ain’t goanna happen.

  48. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    PS: Neither Doron Weinberg nor Dennis Riordan have ever replied to one of her hundreds of emails either. Yet she casually cc’s them like they were the best of friends (“all the best, Kelley”) when in fact none of these people give her the time of day.

  49. Kelley Lynch Says:

    There will be no further discussion about my fictional sex life. Oliver Stone and Steven Segal can take the witness stand and address these allegations personally. I did not drag these men into this situation, although Steven Segal has been quite helpful, but one can safely assume that someone like Oliver Stone might want to know why Leonard Cohen went into my young son’s father’s office and told him that we had sex.

    Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche is Steven Segal’s teacher. Steven Segal is well aware of this. We were also students of His Holiness Penor Rinpoche who I frequently visited at Steven’s house. I have no idea what point “Another Victim” is making here – but he has made this point to me: it is Gianelli/Blogonaut because I just wrote Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche about this and here it is posting lies and insanity again.

    I see – Blogonaut/Gianelli now speaks for Oliver Stone and Steven Segal. I do not and that’s why I want them personally to address these allegations.

    I’ll send Blogonaut/Gianelli the latest email I received from Colleen Chaney/State of Kentucky. I happen to love Maurice and have no idea why his homeless status is such an issue for this individual. He also seems quite fixated on Anderson Cooper.

    I suppose Blogonaut thinks that my teachers are not copied in on my emails really, aren’t paying attention, and are uninterested in what’s happening to me. That’s a very foolish position to take.

    Blogonaut/Gianelli/Kelley Lynch’s Victim continues to speak for the IRS and now the State of Kentucky – proving to me that they do not care about criminal tax fraud. That’s fine. My legal position has nothing to do with theirs. Mine is the mere fact that I had the audacity to report Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, to the IRS and he, Lindsey, and others, decided to destroy my life. The IRS, DOJ, Treasury, FBI, and others should definitely investigate who dragged me to Killer King and falsified the file. Other people understand this all too well. They also understand that the people targeting me on the internet are nuts and insane.

    Kelley Lynch

  50. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan should also speak for themselves. I know one of them may have waved to Blogonaut/Gianelli but I remain unconvinced that “it” speaks for them.

    Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    November 18th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
    PS: Neither Doron Weinberg nor Dennis Riordan have ever replied to one of her hundreds of emails either. Yet she casually cc’s them like they were the best of friends (”all the best, Kelley”) when in fact none of these people give her the time of day.

  51. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch

    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    susanne walsh

    anderson.cooper@cnn.com

    Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Why is Blogonaut-Gianelli-and my so-called victim stating – on behalf of the IRS – that I will not receive the Opinion Letter I have requested? How does it know what I will or will not receive from the IRS?

    And now “it” seems to know Oliver Stone and Steven Segal and may actually be speaking for my teachers some of whom are also Steven’s teachers.

    Steven Segal was quite helpful, to me, with one particular situation that arose with respect to this ordeal and it absolutely concerns the IRS. In fact, I discussed this with the Treasury Agents and it is and always will be psychotic. Steven knows this – he even phoned his attorney.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    – Hide quoted text –
    On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    Hello,

    I assume my so-called “victim” speaks for the State of Kentucky now. Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche is indeed Steven Segal’s teacher and friend – as was His Holiness Penor Rinpoche. I can assure you that I would not post a “reply” from my teachers, Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Phil Spector or his legal team on a public blog in order to refute Blahgonut’s insanity. It knows different. It apparently now knows Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, and Phil Spector.

    For some reason this fool seems obsessed with Anderson Cooper.

    Well, it has insider information – apparently – from the IRS and State of Kentucky that I won’t be receiving Opinion Letters. It looks like someone authorized him to publicly state that it “ain’t gonna happen.” If I have to subopena these Opinion Letters I am “gonna” have them.

    I think it’s safe to say that Doron Weinberg has replied to my emails. We’ll leave it at that.

    Not sure where we’re going here but let’s watch what unfolds with the man I think may have crawled out of a crypt – literally.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  52. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Considering all the vulgar and defamatory nametags Kelley Lynch put on her “enimies”, I guess I should be gratefull that all I am is an “unstable cult fan”. I guess I can live with that.
    I wrote that Kelley Lynch writes vicious gossip about Lorca Cohen because she (Kelley Lynch, not Lorca,) hates Cohen.
    Only one person has EVER mentioned relationships between Kelley Lynch and Oliver Stone and Steven Segal, and that is KELLEY LYNCH, why would anybody else care.
    I have no idea who “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is, but my infamous intuitions tells me that it is NOT Gianelli/Blogonaut. As Kelly Green stated, he was never afraid of stating his real name, and although Kelley Lynch absolutely abused him and his forum, I am sure he never perceived himself as a “victim”.
    Susanne Walsh

  53. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    susanne walsh

    ccdbergman@bergman-law.com

    dateWed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Let me set the record straight regarding Walsh’s further lies.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Susanne Walsh Says:

    November 18th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
    Considering all the vulgar and defamatory nametags Kelley Lynch put on her “enimies”, I guess I should be gratefull that all I am is an “unstable cult fan”. I guess I can live with that.

    There is nothing vulgar and/or defamatory about what I’ve written although this story is ugly and malicious.

    I wrote that Kelley Lynch writes vicious gossip about Lorca Cohen because she (Kelley Lynch, not Lorca,) hates Cohen.

    I could care less about Leonard Cohen. He became increasingly greedy; badmouthed many people (such as Leanne Ungar and Sharon Robinson, etc.); seemed sneaky with respect to his finances; and the situation with his corporations and disdain for ordinary income taxes was unbelievable. I understand why he did not go to the IRS with me.

    Only one person has EVER mentioned relationships between Kelley Lynch and Oliver Stone and Steven Segal, and that is KELLEY LYNCH, why would anybody else care.

    This is a lie. Steven Clark Lindsey told me and emailed me that Cohen and his lawyer (who he described as vicious) came into his office and told him that I had sex with Oliver Stone and Richard Rutowski, a very dear friend of mine who was one of the producers of “Natural Born Killers” and who is a devoted student of His Holiness Thinley Norbu’s Father. Richard was also Oliver Stone’s best friend. Walsh cannot possibly know any of this but she is merely lying and, I believe, highly unstable. If no one cares why do they keep writing about them? In any event, I believe Oliver Stone and Steven Segal are both aware that they will be taking the witness stand in this matter.

    I have no idea who “Another Kelley Lynch Victim” is, but my infamous intuitions tells me that it is NOT Gianelli/Blogonaut. As Kelly Green stated, he was never afraid of stating his real name, and although Kelley Lynch absolutely abused him and his forum, I am sure he never perceived himself as a “victim”.
    Susanne Walsh

    Fine, it’s not Gianelli/Blogonaut. I can’t imagine who it is but intend to subpoena that information so it can hide for now.

  54. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Whatever happend between Ms. Lynch, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone and who-ever in her private life is her bussiness, and NO, I do not know what happend, but I know the only one who has ever written about these people on the internet is Kelley Lynch, she likes people to believe that she was involved with all these famous people, and maybe she was, but that time is over and nobody cares how important they are or what they produced.
    Ms. Lynch wrote me (yet another private mail) that she is leaving Texas, because she fears for her safety from the “Maniacs” who are targeting her. Well I hope she will find a safe place and stop writing garbage on the web, then she will be safe. Maybe finding a job to support herself and keep her busy instead of spending her life harassing blog-readers, would be a good idea.
    Susanne Walsh

  55. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, let’s be clear. When Leonard Cohen goes into my son’s father’s office and accuses me of having sex with Oliver Stone and others – in an attempt to apparently dissuade me from going to the IRS and stirring up Steven Clark Lindsey it’s relevant. You do not know what happened – and that includes with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I don’t care what people believe about who I was involved with. Are you speaking, again, on behalf of people you do not know?

    I didn’t write you a private email. I wrote you so that later no one has any deniability about their lies and slander because I have set the record straight point by point – ad nauseum. I am not leaving Texas because I fear for my safety. I said, and let me quote, the Director of the Star of Hope asked me if I was concerned about my safety. He said nothing about “maniacs” targeting me.

    What is your point – I am not safe until I am silenced? It is not going to happen.

    Kelley Lynch

  56. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch

    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    susanne walsh

    ccdbergman@bergman-law.com

    Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM

    To the DOJ and FBI,

    It’s clear: if I’m silent, I’m safe.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    I hardly think these emails are “private.” After all, the IRS is not my penpal. The DOJ of not my penpal. And neither is the Treasury and/or the FBI. Do you see where I wrote Walsh that I am leaving Texas because I fear for my safety from the maniacs who are targeting me? It’s clear – if they can silence me, however, I’m “safe.” Very sinister way of viewing things actually.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    “Ms. Lynch wrote me (yet another private mail) that she is leaving Texas, because she fears for her safety from the “Maniacs” who are targeting her. Well I hope she will find a safe place and stop writing garbage on the web, then she will be safe.” – Susanne Walsh

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
    Walsh, let’s be clear. When Leonard Cohen goes into my son’s father’s office and accuses me of having sex with Oliver Stone and others – in an attempt to apparently dissuade me from going to the IRS and stirring up Steven Clark Lindsey it’s relevant. You do not know what happened – and that includes with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I don’t care what people believe about who I was involved with. Are you speaking, again, on behalf of people you do not know?
    I didn’t write you a private email. I wrote you so that later no one has any deniability about their lies and slander because I have set the record straight point by point – ad nauseum. I am not leaving Texas because I fear for my safety. I said, and let me quote, the Director of the Star of Hope asked me if I was concerned about my safety. He said nothing about “maniacs” targeting me.
    What is your point – I am not safe until I am silenced? It is not going to happen.

    Kelley Lynch

    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
    Whatever happend between Ms. Lynch, Steven Segal, Oliver Stone and who-ever in her private life is her bussiness, and NO, I do not know what happend, but I know the only one who has ever written about these people on the internet is Kelley Lynch, she likes people to believe that she was involved with all these famous people, and maybe she was, but that time is over and nobody cares how important they are or what they produced.

    Ms. Lynch wrote me (yet another private mail) that she is leaving Texas, because she fears for her safety from the “Maniacs” who are targeting her. Well I hope she will find a safe place and stop writing garbage on the web, then she will be safe. Maybe finding a job to support herself and keep her busy instead of spending her life harassing blog-readers, would be a good idea.
    Susanne Walsh

  57. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, the only famous person who has public lied and accused me of being his lover is Leonard Norman Cohen.

  58. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    Kelley, anyone who has read your various twisted blogs knows that you will post anything resembling a reply from anyone, yet you have never posted any communications from Steven Segal, “Rinpoche”, Phil Spector, Oliver Stone, or any of your other “friends”. Nor has anyone on your spam email list ever replied to you except to ask that they be dropped from the list.

    This is quite a fantasy life you have concocted for yourself, but you have long ago burned any bridges you had in Los Angeles, you have now fled from Boulder, and you now live in a homeless shelter–despite a mother and sister in the area.

    And you have been threatening to obtain subpoenas and then to sue every anonymous blog commenter who has dared challenge your posted nonsense for years—but never have and never will. Indeed, you have not even brought action against the persons whose identities you already know (e.g., Cohen).

    Who do you think you are fooling?

    This really has moved from the bizarre to the pathetic.

  59. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yes, and the only person who in public has mentioned famous people being involved with Kelley Lynch, is Kelley Lynch.
    In the past hour I have received 6 private E-mails from Kelley Lynch, mostly copies of mails send to IRS, and other public offices and “sweet” letters to her various “Holy Men” asking them to pray for her safety from the “Maniacs”. I hope
    The “Holy Men” will pray that Ms. Lynch will stop writing all her private grievances and hate on the internet, that will stop everybody from “targeting” her and her children, that does not mean that anybody wants to “silence” her, just don’t air all your dirty laundry on the web.
    Susanne Walsh

  60. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, see if you can follow this logic – you’ve been copied in on my emails to the IRS and others (documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud I was told is criminal) because you’re lying about me and I am correcting the lies, slander, misinformation, etc.

    Good. We’re clear – Cohen the perverted fraud lied and said we were lovers.

    Gratuitous remarks, of course, about great Tibetan lamas. Cohen, himself, was Joshu Sasaki’s emissary to the 16th Gyalwa Karmapa. The 17th Karmapa is copied in on the emails and, no doubt, understands corrupt governments and corrupt law enforcement.

    I see – are my children still open to being targeted. If I’m not silenced my children are targeted? Fascinating. That’s precisely what I concluded.

    Your are now removed from my emails – to the IRS (and others – DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Phil Spector’s legal team, etc.)

    Kelley Lynch

  61. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch I do follow your logic, I am not lying about you, you know it and everybody else knows it, you destroyed your life and nobody else.
    Nobody is targeting you and your children, you are the one writing all details of your own and your childrens most private lives on the internet, you are an ABUSIVE MOTHER, and your children should not live with you. Keep your private stuff private, hire a lawyer and sue whomever you want, but don’t expect sympathy with all this garbage.
    Really what have you gained in the two years of exposing your and your childrens private lives to “The World”?? Not one blogger or reader has sympathized with you or agreed with you in anything you have said, you have just made yourself look more and more unstable and wacky and lost all credibility.
    So what if Cohen said “you were lovers” 20 years ago, maybe he meant it as a compliment, but get over it.
    Susanne Walsh

  62. Susanne Walsh Says:

    PS. Thank you for removing me from your E-mail list
    Susanne Walsh

  63. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Ms. Walsh, you were merely being copied in because I intend to prove that you – and others – are liars. It’s very very simple. You, on the other hand, have proven (to my satisfaction) that I (and my children) have been targeted and will continue to be targeted until I am silenced. That will be when hell freezes over. In the meantime, continue on with your attempts to impress the man who thinks he was my lover and who I know is a pathelogical liar, calculated fraud, and definitely a jealous pervert.

    Kelley Lynch

  64. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Kelley Lynch has been threatening to sue us since we were required to ban her from commenting on our site after we returned from a hiatus on Crete in May of 2009 to learn that Lynch had hijacked several comments sections following several Phil Spector retrial related posts, and posted scores of defamatory items that we subsequently deleted.

    This was well before we ever mentioned the name “Kelley Lynch” in print.

    Things went downhill from there. Our attorney wrote to Ms. Lynch, and then she started spamming our attorney.

    But since Ms. Lynch was threatening to retain Bruce Cutler to take legal action against us, our attorney contacted Mr. Cutler who called him back immediately to advise that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him a dozen unwanted and unsolicited voice messages for two years and that he regarded her as a telephone stalker—thus ending Lynch’s “I am waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler” gambit.

    More recently, we reached out to a Phil Spector security consultant (Bill Pavelic) that Lynch was also touting as a “friend” in hundreds of posted (on her blog) emails cc’d to this high profile person, and he replied that he has noting to do with Ms. Lynch, who is obviously a “very disturbed woman”.

    Our attorney also had an extended telephone conversation with a Treasury Agent who is also prominently listed as a cc recipient on the hundreds of rant emails posted on Lynch’s blog (and also the email posted above) who assured our attorney that we had noting to fear from the IRS as a result of any Lynch related accusations because Lynch is not credible.

    In 2005, after Cohen obtained a civil harassment restraining order against Lynch and was preparing to take enforcement action against Lynch, she fled to Boulder Colorado, where (according to her) she was frequently arrested.

    Cohen obtained a civil harassment restraining order against Lynch in Boulder, Colorado, in 2008, and repeating her earlier pattern, Lynch initially fled to New Jersey to avoid repercussions, then returned to Colorado, then fled to Houston Texas (after calling police to report the young couple who had taken her into their home for alleged drug abuse).

    Kelley Lynch is currently living in a homeless shelter in Houston Texas not far her mother’s residence and the residence of her sister and brother-in-law.

    She blogs her hate filled emails and blog posts from a certain branch of the Huston Public Library.

    Lynch, for all of her hate filled posts about this blog, is on our blog almost every day blogging from that Huston Public Library branch (which we have not named) that has an IP address of 66.60.241.7.

    Lynch was on our site reading various posts today, November 17, 2009, in fact, reading two different Blogonaut posts covering the Phil Spector appeal.

    Lynch has been publicly defaming this blog and our attorney for many months, and the only reason that we have not sued Lynch for libel is that she is impecunious and leads a transient lifestyle.

    –Blogonaut Law Blog

  65. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yes OK Ms. Lynch.. I received your E-mails on my private E-mail address which means it is private mails.
    You Ms. Lynch and ONLY you are targeting your children, no normal people would want to cause pain to their own or to other peoples children, but you Ms. Lynch obviously have no problems with that.
    Susanne Walsh

  66. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Actually you are lying about me. Since you don’t know me, didn’t know Cohen in the 20 years I worked with him (as a personal manager), and have not reviewed the evidence I’ve sent to the IRS and others, one has to assume that you are merely a cult victim attempting to ingratiate yourself with Leonard Cohen.

    People have targeted me and my children. I’ll give you one example: Leonard Cohen’s very own lawyer (for lack of a better word and/or description), Robert Kory, filed a Declaration in my son’s custody matter. That is an attempt to obstruct justice, coerce me into an illegal deal, and – of course – it is witness tampering. Why is it witness tampering, Ms. Walsh? Let me lead you through this very very simply – because my son “witnessed” a conversation between me and Kory about criminal tax fraud (Cohen’s); the missing tax returns (State of Kentucky and probably elsewhere); my intellectual property that Cohen stole (from Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. – I have the corporate books, records, stock certificates, and Cohen’s notarized signature to prove this); and their lame threats.

    You are lying again. I am not an abusive Mother and my chlidren know this. In fact, my older son is really eager for me to begin my legal proceedings and wants to join me in those. You do, however, seem to be a bit hysterical now. My children should decide who they want to live with – not you, a mere stranger and Cohen’s #1 fan.

    I can assure you that I’m not looking for sympathy on the internet. I am, however, documenting all the slander, lies, defamation, etc.

    Well, given the fact that everyone I have spoken with believes Phil Spector was framed and Cohen has committed criminal tax fraud and should be prosecuted, one can assume that the blog readers are mindless idiots. Either that – or just stupid.

    Cohen didn’t say we were lovers 20 years ago. In fact, he pin-pointed to the precise time when I happened to work for Phil Spector. That would be the same time that a witness in Phillip’s matter (Diane Ogden), who has since died of a drug overdose (another matter the DEA should look into probably), said she did. This allegation also proves that Leonard Cohen is, as I’ve stated, a pathelogical liar. You seem to come up with endless excuses. If you want to be Cohen’s lover – be my guest. That thought makes me want to “Puke.”

    Let’s revisit Eminem’s song “Puke.” Somehow, Eminem personally summed up my exact feelings about Leonard Cohen although he dedicated the live MTV version (with the references to “dry humping” to Mariah Carey. I also dedicated to Spector prosecutor Pat Dixon who I wouldn’t have sex with if my life depended on it or if he were the last man on the planet. Blogonaut/Gianelli might though.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AmCIryu6Q&feature=related

    Kelley Lynch

  67. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch, all your dwelling on sex, seems to indicate that You , not I, are the frustrated one. Try to find a cute guy, maybe that will relax you a bit
    Susanne Walsh

  68. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gratuitous, lame, boring …

  69. Susanne Walsh Says:

    OK Ms. Lynch, sorry I bored you, anyway it is late night in Denmark now, so sweet dreams to you (or whatever you want to do with the rest of your day)
    By the way I have now received 14 E-mails from you, I guess you forgot to take me off your list??
    Susanne Walsh

  70. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Since Ms. Lynch is fond of publishing her hundreds of monthly emails to her various spam victims on various internet sites, here is our response to Kelley Lynch’s 12th email of today:

    November 18, 2009

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    We do not understand why you are copying this blog with personal correspondence that you have sent to your son, sister, and brother-in-law–or at all–since you represented to us on September 3, 2009 that you would be dropping us from your email list—per your agreement with an investigator with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.

    Your emails (a dozen today) are unwanted spam. Clearly you are a very disturbed woman.

    This blog was required to ban you from commenting as a result of your habit of posting slanderous material about various persons.

    As you have recently advised us, you have been reduced to living in a homeless shelter despite living near your mother, sister and brother-in-law–who obviously are as tired of your daily drama as are we–to the point that they have (apparently) washed their hands of you.

    We are sorry that you have decided not to seek psychiatric help but at this point it’s not our problem.

    It was very cleaver of the City of Houston to provide you with a bus ticket our of their jurisdiction.

    If only we could do the same.

    What a shame that you have not sought help and that as a result instead of spending the Holliday’s with family, you are moving on, alone, once again to another state.

    Please do not contact this blog, our attorney, or anyone else affiliated with us again. We are quite confident that your mother, son and sister are not thrilled about your copying your emails to them to us and the rest of your spam email list (including the IRS, Justice Department, etc. etc.) either.

    –Blogonaut Law Blog

  71. Sydney Says:

    KELLY – GIVE IT A REST ALREADY. YOU ARE GETTING NOWHERE AND YOU WILL GET NOWHERE IN THE FUTURE UNTIL YOU STOP ABUSING YOURSELF AND YOUR CHILDREN AND GET THE PROFESSIONAL PSYCHIATRIC HELP YOU SO DESPERATELY NEED. There now, that feels better. Kelly, I swore I would not respond to any of these continuing rants of yours against people you don’t even know, but it is impossible when I see you hijack every web site that mentions Leonard Cohen. The only person you rant and slander and libel that you know is LC. All these folks you cc don’t know you any more than they know the Easter Bunny – which bespeaks the childishness of your rants. Give the world a break, would you? No one has done anything to you that you have not brought on yourself. Surely someone at that shelter you live in can refer you to someone for psychiatric help.

  72. Kelly Green Says:

    Oh for the love of God, is there no one on this planet who cares about or loves Kelley Lynch enough to get her professional help?

  73. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Kelly Green, my thoughts exactly.
    It may be possible that Kelley Lynch’s family is afraid that she will have a complete meltdown or even worse, turn her rage towards them, if they confront her with her emotional and mental state.
    Kelley Lynch’s narcissism and sense of self-importance is so enormous, which is a clear indication of mental disturbance. She truely believes that public internet forums exists only for her, a place where she has the right to express all her hate and to lie, slander and threaten people she know as well as many she does not know, but anybody who gives her a response she does not like, should be reported to the IRS, The FBI and the DOJ.
    Susanne Walsh

  74. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch

    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    mpduke1@msn.com

    ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
    Kelley Lynch

    Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    To the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and the Treasury,

    I would like to take this time to thank each of “you” for accomodating my little federal prank. It’s very sportsmanlike of you. I realize that the federal government is extremely busy and, therefore, I feel especially fortunate that I’ve been able to connect with truly “fun” agencies in a meaningful way.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    Good Morning Gentle Men,

    Please see my comments – in red – below re. the latest bout of public lunacy.

    Thank you.

    Love,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    Hello Bill,

    Excuse me for contacting you again. I trust you’re well and I trust you know that I intend to nail this lunatic. Every word Gianelli, who spoke with you, has said (about me) is a lie. It certainly is keenly interested in me. Obsessed might be a better word. It’s communications with “Jackson” are, of course, of the utmost interest to me – and, no doubt, Phil Spector. If the FBI thinks it’s ok for Gianelli-Blogonaut to lie to them that’s just fine with me.

    In any event, Bill, I think my sister and brother-in-law who are copied in here can speak for themselves and I can assure you that Gianelli-Blogonaut does not speak for them. It speaks for everyone else, however. That includes, but is not limited to, the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, FBI, Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Bruce Cutler.

    Thanks for noting that you didn’t think I was involved with a federal prank. I didn’t think so either, Bill. I thought I was targeted by lunatics after reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into Phil Spector’s insanity. Since you know Brian Bennett you must know that someone (a woman) placed an anonymous tip about Phil Spector and my friendship to the District Attorney’s office. These incidents (the tax fraud/murder trial) have exposed me to truly unstable individuals. Shady hardly beings to describe it.

    My Mother is elderly, concerned that my children could commit suicide if they read what is being written, and is concerned that these people will target her and my Father. So ask yourself this, Bill – should I sit by silently and let cyber-terrorists and thug liars target my family? Reporting tax fraud to the IRS is extremely dangerous. That’s why intelligent individuals are concerned about my safety.

    Have a good day.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the Federal Bureau of Investigation,

    The man who has lied to you is having a blast, apparently, posting about me, monitoring my actions, and boasting that I am being investigated. Why don’t you write me and explain why I am being investigated and why reporting criminal tax fraud, documenting the destruction of my life, and correcting lies and slander is spam.

    While I await your answer please see my comments re. Blogonaut’s post and others on Phawker.com. Sydney, who also posts, on Blogonaut’s site seems positively hysterical from my perspective. Why should I continue to be victimized by madmen and women who are aware that the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI are copied in and are writing about this fact. I absolutely believe I have been exposed to truly unstable people due to the fact that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and was dragged into Phil Spector’s murder trial that is clearly a set up. If every single person I speak with understand this and five of the greatest forensic scientists in America have concluded that Clarkson shot herself than the citizens of the United States should pray that the FBI figured it out also.

    These people have now crossed the line. I am not an abusive Mother and I am sick of their lies about me and my family. If the FBI thinks it is acceptable that they have been lied to – by Gianelli-Blogonaut – that’s your business and that’s your problem.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Since Ms. Lynch is fond of publishing her hundreds of monthly emails to her various spam victims on various internet sites, here is our response to Kelley

    Lynch’s 12th email of today:
    November 18, 2009

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    We do not understand why you are copying this blog with personal correspondence that you have sent to your son, sister, and brother-in-law–or at all–since you represented to us on September 3, 2009 that you would be dropping us from your email list—per your agreement with an investigator with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.
    I don’t understand why the FBI thinks it’s acceptable that you have lied to them. I personally believe it’s a crime and know people have gone to prison for this. I also don’t understand why you contacted Investigator William Frayeh/Investigator in the Phil Spector matter, or were in touch with Cohen’s legal team and attempted to put me in touch with Cohen. If you don’t understand that I am documenting everything and correcting/addressing malicious lies and slander then you don’t understand english.

    I had no such agreement with Investigator Frayeh of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office.

    Your emails (a dozen today) are unwanted spam. Clearly you are a very disturbed woman.

    My emails are not spam although the truth may be unwanted when people like you lie to the FBI and intentionally slander and malign me.

    This blog was required to ban you from commenting as a result of your habit of posting slanderous material about various persons.

    You banned me because your reporter Joff Belark wrote one long lie disguised as an article and I adamently set out to correct those lies.

    As you have recently advised us, you have been reduced to living in a homeless shelter despite living near your mother, sister and brother-in-law–who obviously are as tired of your daily drama as are we–to the point that they have (apparently) washed their hands of you.

    I don’t know if I believe you have properly characterized the fact that I “advised” you that I have been “reduced” to living in a homeless shelter. What’s your point? Do you know my Mother, sister, or brother-in-law and how can you speak for them? They have not washed their hands of me and you are nothing other than a pathetic liar.

    We are sorry that you have decided not to seek psychiatric help but at this point it’s not our problem.

    I don’t need psychiatric help but I think your actual problems are criminal in nature.

    It was very cleaver of the City of Houston to provide you with a bus ticket our of their jurisdiction.

    This is another lie as I have already explained to you. The City of Houston has not provided me with a bus ticket.

    If only we could do the same.

    What a shame that you have not sought help and that as a result instead of spending the Holliday’s with family, you are moving on, alone, once again to another state.

    How would you know where I am spending the holidays?
    Please do not contact this blog, our attorney, or anyone else affiliated with us again. We are quite confident that your mother, son and sister are not thrilled about your copying your emails to them to us and the rest of your spam email list (including the IRS, Justice Department, etc. etc.) either.

    Why would you assume that I am spamming the IRS, DOJ, and others. They are well aware that I have reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and provided them with substantial evidence of this allegation – including my emails with Cohen, Westin, Greenberg, all the advisers, etc.
    –Blogonaut Law Blog

    Sydney, who does not know me, seems highly unstable and hysterical. Someone at the Shelter – the Director – thought my safety was of the utmost concern. My Mother thought that people like this are deranged and could target me.

    Sydney Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
    KELLY – GIVE IT A REST ALREADY. YOU ARE GETTING NOWHERE AND YOU WILL GET NOWHERE IN THE FUTURE UNTIL YOU STOP ABUSING YOURSELF AND YOUR CHILDREN AND GET THE PROFESSIONAL PSYCHIATRIC HELP YOU SO DESPERATELY NEED. There now, that feels better. Kelly, I swore I would not respond to any of these continuing rants of yours against people you don’t even know, but it is impossible when I see you hijack every web site that mentions Leonard Cohen. The only person you rant and slander and libel that you know is LC. All these folks you cc don’t know you any more than they know the Easter Bunny – which bespeaks the childishness of your rants. Give the world a break, would you? No one has done anything to you that you have not brought on yourself. Surely someone at that shelter you live in can refer you to someone for psychiatric help.

    Stupid.

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 1:24 am

    Oh for the love of God, is there no one on this planet who cares about or loves Kelley Lynch enough to get her professional help?

    My family, who all know Leonard Cohen, are probably aware that this is what some of his fans are like. They are actually concerned (afraid perhaps) that these fans will target them. At least Walsh is aware that the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury are copied in on my emails – documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s criminal tax fraud. Fortunately, the federal agencies I’ve copied in were all game and playing along with my little “prank.” Very accomodating of them.

    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 5:49 am

    Kelly Green, my thoughts exactly.

    It may be possible that Kelley Lynch’s family is afraid that she will have a complete meltdown or even worse, turn her rage towards them, if they confront her with her emotional and mental state.

    Kelley Lynch’s narcissism and sense of self-importance is so enormous, which is a clear indication of mental disturbance. She truely believes that public internet forums exists only for her, a place where she has the right to express all her hate and to lie, slander and threaten people she know as well as many she does not know, but anybody who gives her a response she does not like, should be reported to the IRS, The FBI and the DOJ.
    Susanne Walsh

  75. Sydney Says:

    You are both right, of course Kelly and Susanne. It seems that Kelley has burned all her bridges behind her and there is no longer anyone who will take her under their wing to get her the help she so desperately needs. It is normal for a person suffering from mental illness to believe everyone is out to get her, that everyone is lying about her and that everyone is against her. It’s called denial and is very difficult to break through. I’ve tried in the past to reach out to Kelley via email, but I was left with a response right out of the DSM-IV (the diagnostic manual for psychiatric disorders), and finally told her I was done with her. Lucky for me she dropped me from her rant-list. She did seem to calm down for a short time, but now she is back armed to the teeth with paranoia, hatefulness and unbridled rage at the people she knows only on the net, and her nagging self-pity presented to all those poor government officials, attorney’s and of course Blogonaut. I cannot understand why she is not being forced into a psych unit for at least the 72 hour hold that a Chapter 52 committal would require. Well, I guess I will now go back on her list of enemies but that is something I have no control over. Kelley, despite the threats you hear in everyone’s comments, there are people who do care what happens to you and we truly hope you will get some help. At least go for an evaluation so you can prove us wrong, if in fact we are.

  76. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    mpduke1@msn.com

    ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
    Kelley Lynch ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark

    Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM

    cc: Blogonaut, Gianelli, and Belark

    For the record.

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the Mayor of Houston,

    Just trapping Blogonaut, and others, in their lies, slander, defamation, etc. For the record, the City of Houston is not supplying me with a bus ticket or any other type of ticket for transportation related to my next trip.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  77. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    mpduke1@msn.com

    ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
    Kelley Lynch

    Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM

    Karen and David,

    Please see Sydney’s note below. Now these are the types of lunatics I have been exposed to. Clearly I haven’t burned my bridges with you or my family. Lindsey destroyed Ray’s life and I think it’s safe to say that he’s garbage, a pathelogical liar, and abusive man. I don’t believe everyone is out to get me. I know for a fact that strangers are lying about me and slandering me on the internet. Why would Sydney, who is lying about me, try to reach out to me and why would I respond? I see Sydney’s not “done” with me yet. I never had Sydney on any rant list so apparently it has delusions of grandeur. All the poor government officials. That’s truly an amazing statement. I see attempting to force me into a psychiatric ward is being publicly discussed. This is a recurring theme in this matter – in fact, as you know, Lindsey even wanted me committed so he could have access to my photo albums. Quite a sick, twisted man but we know that. Sydney, who I don’t know, thinks it’s my enemy. This is really quite pathetic. Perhaps Sydney is an ego-maniac who thinks it is at the center of Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s set up.

    Rutger knows where I need to go for help – to the criminal attorney I am keeping closely apprised of every single thing that’s unfold. Then again, Rutger’s brilliant and these nuts are mere lunatics and unstable individuals who have targeted me and appear obsessed with me.

    Love,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Agent Sopko,

    Please see my comments below. Sydney has posted on Blogonaut’s site and does not know me – at all. This has become a truly sick situation.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Sydney Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
    You are both right, of course Kelly and Susanne. It seems that Kelley has burned all her bridges behind her and there is no longer anyone who will take her under their wing to get her the help she so desperately needs. It is normal for a person suffering from mental illness to believe everyone is out to get her, that everyone is lying about her and that everyone is against her. It’s called denial and is very difficult to break through. I’ve tried in the past to reach out to Kelley via email, but I was left with a response right out of the DSM-IV (the diagnostic manual for psychiatric disorders), and finally told her I was done with her. Lucky for me she dropped me from her rant-list. She did seem to calm down for a short time, but now she is back armed to the teeth with paranoia, hatefulness and unbridled rage at the people she knows only on the net, and her nagging self-pity presented to all those poor government officials, attorney’s and of course Blogonaut. I cannot understand why she is not being forced into a psych unit for at least the 72 hour hold that a Chapter 52 committal would require. Well, I guess I will now go back on her list of enemies but that is something I have no control over. Kelley, despite the threats you hear in everyone’s comments, there are people who do care what happens to you and we truly hope you will get some help. At least go for an evaluation so you can prove us wrong, if in fact we are.

  78. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch

    to”*irs. commissioner” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    “Chaney, Colleen (SOS)” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Duane ,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net,
    Mick Brown ,
    mpduke1@msn.com

    ccdbergman@bergman-law.com,
    Kelley Lynch

    Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM

    P.S. I’m going to have a word with Rutger’s attorneys about this situation. It’s probably affected him.

  79. Sydney Says:

    I rest my case…

  80. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, you have no case. You are lying about me. You sound like a lunatic and you have no idea what you are talking about. A friend of mine just wrote me with his insights into what is going on here. I think the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury should take him seriously. I have the full support of my parents, sister, her husband, and my older son. My younger son’s life has been destroyed. His father has a pattern of taking children away from their mothers. We know him. You do not. He, not I, had the vicodin, ambien, etc. addiction. Your interest in me is truly sick. I am a stranger. My attorney will rest my case. His/her name will be revealed when he/she advises me to do so. In the meantime, underestimate me and assume I’m bluffing. I will, on the other hand, document the slander, malice, defamation, etc. – all of which I view as “witness tampering” particularly when it’s intentional: think Gianelli/Blogonaut.

    Kelley Lynch

  81. Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:

    “Witness tampering” is a legal term of art that excludes blog comments.

    One can only wonder if KL’s life is in order, and she has the “full support” of her family in Texas, who she is leaving Texas for another state on the eve of the Thanksgiving and christmas Hollidays.

    As for the “crimianl attorney” that Lynch is keeping apprised of this matter in connection with her desire to sue Cohen,–for that KL will need a civil litigation attorney, and moreover an attorney with the ability to trun back time to before Lynch’s statute of limitations to sue Cohen expired.

  82. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,

    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    dateThu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:14 PM
    subjectKelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles, Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and others – professionally and individually
    mailed-bygmail.com

    hide details 1:14 PM (1 hour ago)

    Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Alan Jackson is copied in on my emails. I do believe that Phillip will join me in a lawsuit against these maniacs. They ought to take a good hard look in the mirror so they can see what other people see: a bunch of corrupt government officials who framed Phil Spector. That’s how credible I am. Every single person I’ve spoken to believes this. It also happens to be true so it’s particularly unreal.

    I want to know what Blogonaut-Gianelli’s connection is to the Los Angeles District Attorney, Alan Jackson personally, Leonard Cohen’s advisers, and – of course – the Clarkson family. All of these parties – and Cohen, Lindsey, their advisers, et al. – have “motive.”

    Love,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the FBI,

    I would assume that Cooley & Gang kept the recording of the woman that left an anonymous tip about my friendship with Phil Spector. If not – they destroyed “evidence” which the Duty Agent in Denver told me is criminal.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    Alan Jackson and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office – including Steve Cooley,

    Take a look at the lunatic cyber-terrorists who are dead set on slandering me and undermining my credibility. Unfortunately, they are all liars. Someone dragged me into the Phil Spector murder trial and I personally believe that someone is Leonard Cohen – although Brian Bennett told me it was an anonymous tip placed by a woman to the District Attorney. Hopefully, you’ve saved that recording because I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko – the Treasury Department, Phil Spector and his legal team to listen to it. Blogonaut, who you were in touch with, continues to monitor my whereabouts. A friend of mine just pointed out that the people on these Blogs (and emailing me) know far too much about me.

    Leonard Cohen appears to have committed criminal tax fraud. He is and will always be a pathelogical liar and calculated fraud. If he was your witness in a grand jury against Phil Spector that is your problem. My problem: that my parents and children have been dragged into this and targeted. If you think I believe that you care about Lana Clarkson you better get real. I think you are some of the biggest criminals in the United States of America. I think you are corrupt. I think you set up an innocent man. I think you intentionally maligned and slandered Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, Dr. James Pex, and Dr. Vincent DeMaio and I think you have to be hitting the crack pipe if you actually believe that five of the greatest forensic scientists in America would all take the witness stand and lie. It – and you – insults the intelligence.

    Perhaps major federal agencies are involved in a prank here. And perhaps they are not. I believe you, Cohen, Lindsey, and others, have exposed me to dangerously unstable people and I believe some of those people (Stephen Gianelli – who wanted to know if Investigator Frayeh told me Dixon’s good looking) have “motive.” I know for a fact he lied to the FBI and I happen to be convinced that this is a crime.

    For the record, I don’t have sexual fantasies about men like Dixon who I think has engaged in a set up. Are we clear?

    If Blogonaut-Gianelli found a sympathetic ear with you, Jackson, then you are totally out of your mind.

    I believe that you have exposed me and my family (including my children) to these lunatics. And, I intend to send Phil Spector my letter to you (Jackson) and I doubt he’ll find it all that funny. After all, he knows he’s innocent: he witnessed Clarkson shoot herself at his house. I think the DEA should investigate that and I think they should investigate Ogden’s death. That was also drug related and it’s at the heart of your “media circus” and legal farce.

    Kelley Lynch

    cc: Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko – the Treasury Department

    80 Responses to “MAILBAG: “Leonard Cohen Is Not A ‘Great Man’””

  83. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, if you think this is a “game” for Phil Spector then you do not know Phil Spector. You definitely don’t know me.

    Kelley Lynch
    cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
    dumpstevecooley.blogspot.com

  84. Kelley Lynch Says:

    From: Kelley Lynch

    To: “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , joffbelark@gmail.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, mpduke1@msn.com, “karen@mccourt.org” , “david@mccourt.org”

    Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 8:54 PM

    Hello,

    I continue to assume that “Another Kelley Lynch victim” is someone either affiliated with Gianelli-Blogonaut or IS Gianelli-Blogonaut. It now weighs in on witness tampering. I can assure you that I don’t think an inanimate object – say a Blog – witness tampered. I am saying that Gianelli-Blogonaut and others do.

    I see the lunatic is very very focused on my holiday activities. Who I spend the holidays with is my business and not the business of strangers who engage in cyber-terrorism and are monitoring my activities. And most certainly not lunatics and criminals that “lie” to the FBI and speak for so many federal agencies and Phil Spector’s legal team and former attorney.

    Actually, I was told I need a litigator and I am consulting a litigator. Fraud tolls the statute and until the IRS and State of Kentucky give me the Opinion Letters I have requested and some investigations are done – into things like whether or not Cohen, Lindsey, et al. conspired to have me falsely arrested and issues relating to Killer King, etc. – I don’t think I should be put in the legal position of having to guess. I was also told the key issue here is jurisdiction which I will leave to my extremely competent criminal attorney who understands that I am dealing with criminal issues. The FBI Duty Agent in Denver appeared to understand this when we discussed witness and evidence tampering. Apart from the evidence I filed with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s Fraud in Boulder I have a policy: do not touch evidence. Dan Scheid, Greenberg’s lawyer, has already informed me that they have evidence that relates to Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Steven Clark Lindsey and Betsy Superfon.

    I don’t think “witness tampering” is really an art. I think it’s a crime that carries prison terms.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Another Kelley Lynch victim Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    “Witness tampering” is a legal term of art that excludes blog comments.

    One can only wonder if KL’s life is in order, and she has the “full support” of her family in Texas, who she is leaving Texas for another state on the eve of the Thanksgiving and christmas Hollidays.

    As for the “crimianl attorney” that Lynch is keeping apprised of this matter in connection with her desire to sue Cohen,–for that KL will need a civil litigation attorney, and moreover an attorney with the ability to trun back time

  85. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli/Blogonaut,

    I intend to file a complaint with the police department in the State I am visiting in the near future. It will state that I believe you are criminally harassing my son and cyber-stalking me, monitoring my activities, etc. I will explain that you are also witness tampering, etc. Assume I’m bluffing.

    Kelley Lynch

  86. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    When you arrive in California late tomorrow to visit your son Rutger courtesy of a bus ticket provided by the Star of Hope and stop by to report us to your local police department please be sure to mention that you have outstanding warrants for your arrest and to give the nice officer the contact information for our attorney, Stephen R. Gianelli, who would be happy to fill the officer in on your activities and current legal status.

    Please do mention your arrest record in Los Angeles, California and Bounder Colorado and how all of this is pursuant to a grand conspiracy against you because you have been “targeted” to discredit you as a witness to Leonard Cohen’s “tax fraud” that you reported five years ago (with no prosecution).

  87. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    PS: do not forget to mention to then nice officer your claim that you were “kidnapped” by the LAPD and taken to a psychiatric facility against your will (Killer King), your previously published belief that LA Swat was there to “murder” you to silence you, as well as your claim that the LAPD then falsified its report as well as the Killer King records in order to “discredit” you as a witness against Cohen—all aid the “set up” of Phil Spector on murder charges. Please do also mention that this is only one of two involuntary psychiatric commitments that you have suffered.

  88. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, how many more years are you going to waste repeating the same tired nonsense and threats? No one would have anything to say to you if you did not continually post accusations, threaten to report, and subpoena everyone who comments on your postings, or dared to disagree with you. If you don’t want people to post comments about and to you, then stop posting these things on the internet. It is really very simple. Stop writing all the tired accusations, and no one will write to you. Show us a retainer agreement with an attorney, show us responses from any of the law enforcement agencies you send mass-mailings to, show us one iota of proof of all the manifestations of evil you say are conspiring against you. When you do any of those things, I believe no one will bother you anymore. I certainly won’t.

  89. Stephen R. Gianelli Says:

    November 19, 2009

    Dear Kelley Lynch:

    As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.

    You are hereby requested to cease and desist slandering Blogonaut, this office, and any other persons affiliated with us, on the internet, including but not limited to your blogs, or otherwise.

    If you fail to so desist, I will be suing you, David McCourt, Karen McCourt, Rutger Penick, and all other persons whom you have claimed to Blogonaut in writing have aided and encouraged you to pursue this course of action.

    Please govern yourself accordingly.

    By email, we are so informing David, Karen, and Rudger.

    This office is well aware of your current whereabouts in California, and is fully prepared to sue you, Rutger, Karen and David forthwith, should you post a single additional disparaging comment about Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, including the undersigned.

    Very truly yours,

    Stephen R. Gianelli
    PO Box 475013
    San Francisco, California 94147

    (415) 929-5130

    CC; Karen McCourt, David McCourt, Rudger Penick

  90. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut – what’s your interest in my whereabouts and why are you emailing my son Rutger your threats and lies? I could care less about a smoking and camping warrant. The “homeless court” would have thrown them out. Believe me – when I arrive at my destination I’m taking your postings/emails into law enforcement (probably the FBI) and asking them to investigate why you are harassing and stalking me.

    Kelley Lynch

  91. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    todoronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net

    cc”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

    Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM

    To the Houston FBI,

    I am presently in Houston, Texas. This man, Gianelli/Blogonaut, is dead set on monitoring my actions, harassing me and my son, threatening me and my son, slandering me, lying about me, etc. I am leaving Texas and intend to make an appointment and sit down with an FBI agent when I reach my destination. Please see pertinent documents at my cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com Blog. This relates to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and the Phil Spector murder trial set up and I can assure you it’s deadly serious. Gianelli-Blogonaut has already lied to Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland.

    Trust me – this individual has “motive.” He has also been in contact with Investigator Frayeh who was an investigator in the Phil Spector matter. And, he has been in touch with Leonard Cohen’s legal team.

    Kelley Lynch

    http://cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/pertinent-documents-for-fawning.html

  92. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    todoronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net

    cc”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

    dateFri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM
    subjectRe: Houston FBI
    mailed-bygmail.com

    hide details 11:05 AM (0 minutes ago)

    To the Houston FBI,

    I was held hostage by a SWAT Team (comprised of LAPD and Inglewood PD). They told my son they were going to shoot me. Apparenty my dog was my “hostage” and they were taking precautions. Chris/Homeland Security told me that it was entirely possible that the District Attorney or the Governor’s Office was behind some of this. People do conclude that the District Attorney had the power and motive to have me taken to Killer King – after all, I was questioned about Phil Spector en route and the entire file is falsified. This is a game for Gianelli/Blogonaut and he has apparenty concluded that Agent Wynar is an idiot who works at an agency called Full Blown Insanity. I have not claimed that LAPD falsified the Killer King report. I have asked, repeatedly, that this situation be investigated. While I was being taken to Killer King, my son Rutger (who just confirmed this in writing, again, by email that I sent to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury) was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory. He was asked to do this by my young son’s father who coordinated a custody matter. Leonard Cohen’s lawyer filed a “Declaration” in that matter – as did Betsy Superfon. There is evidence in Boulder, Colorado that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested. And that brings me to why I initially contacted the FBI in Denver; because there is evidence of criminal witness tampering in Boulder, Colorado. They advised me to go into the FBI in Los Angeles – which I did. Then, because activity on the part of law enforcement was crossing state line I began calling the FBI in Denver. The Duty Agent I’m not arguing with apparently doesn’t think LAPD was behind Officer Storbeck’s rolling into Deneuve Construction where I worked. I think they were involved because I had just left a message for “Officer Hampton” (one of the officers who took me to Killer King) and “Officer Garrin” was incredibly pissed off.\

    The other “involuntary commitment” happened because – and this is documented – I mentioned the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Fortunately, when UCLA Harbor realized I called Steven Segal they released me. It’s a Hollywood story.

    All the best,
    Kelley Lynch

    November 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

  93. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    todoronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Joff Belark ,
    mayor@cityofhouston.net

    cc”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    karen@mccourt.org,
    david@mccourt.org,
    mpduke1@msn.com

    dateFri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:11 AM
    subjectCorrecting Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Public Lies, Slander, and Evidence of Cyber-Terrorism, Stalking, Etc.
    mailed-bygmail.com

    hide details 11:11 AM (1 minute ago)

    To the Houston FBI,

    Here’s what I also know – Gianelli is Blogonaut and, therefore, based on this letter he appears to be a schizophrenic. My Mother thinks he is truly unstable and that I have now been exposed to dangerously unstable people. I am not in California. If you would like to meet me at the Star of Hope – they have been advised that they may divulge the fact that I am staying there to the FBI. Gianelli-Blogonaut has no idea where I intend to go but I intend to go into the FBI immediately. I want to sit down with an Agent and review the posts and emails I have received. I think Rutger should go into the FBI in Los Angeles on his end, as well.

    As the Duty Agent in Denver noted; the activity connected to these matters is taking place all across the country.

    Gianelli-Blogonaut has also threatened my sister and her husband.

    All the best,
    Kelley Lynch

    Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
    November 19, 2009
    Dear Kelley Lynch:
    As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.

  94. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, I think Cohen has wasted unbelievable government resources – attempting to cover up his tax fraud that I was told is criminal and reported. Gianelli/Blogonaut clearly has serious motive to undermine me, slander me, obstruct justice, witness tamper, threaten me and my family – including my son Rutger. This shameless thug should definitely be investigated and prosecuted. That is my personal opinion and I could care less if he’s a licensed attorney. He should also be disbarred based upon what I’ve witnessed. And, he continues to raise Alan Jackson as an issue. What is he – Jackson’s protector?

    I intend to go into the FBI when I arrive at my destination and will sit down and discuss Gianelli-Blogonaut’s emails, posts, lie disguised as an article, and possible motive.

    Kelley Lynch

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Investigator William Frayeh
    To: “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, joffbelark@gmail.com
    Cc: “doronweinberg” , “Dennis” , “ASKDOJ” , “*irs. commissioner” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “Jewel of Activity” , “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Joff Belark” , mayor@cityofhouston.net, “Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, mpduke1@msn.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, teresa.low@doj.ca.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, pio@lapd.lacity.org, oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org, chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, governor@governor.ca.gov, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Duane” , rand.hoffman@umusic.com, lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 5:29 PM

    Hello Investigator Frayeh,

    As I explained to you, I am addressing all the lies, slander, fraud, etc. circulating about me on the internet and – in particular – being set forth in emails, on Blogs, etc. by Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut who phoned you to determine whether or not you made an off-the-cuff remark about Dixon being good looking. Somehow that turned into my having a sexual fantasy about a man I do not know, could care less about, and who I happen to think set up my friend Phil Spector. That’s a very very twisted allegation. I don’t believe my allegations are false. As I said to you, I think these are felonies. This man is monitoring my actions and is attempting to threaten my son Rutger and my sister and her husband. My Mother was concerned these maniacs and lunatics would also target them.

    Every single word uttered and written by this man, about me, is a lie. I have now contacted – via email – the Houston FBI. I am in Texas – not California – but clearly Gianelli-Blogonaut has motive to monitor my actions. He has lied to Agent Wynar/FBI in Oakland. He has been in touch with Cohen’s legal team and offered to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen and stated that Cohen would be willing to help me. In fact, I can get my life back – including my children. Alan Jackson, as you and I discussed, contacted Gianelli-Blogonaut. That is an incredibly serious matter to me and one can safely assume that it is an incredibly serious matter for Phil Spector.

    This man has no decency. He has no boundaries. He is arrogant. He is a liar. I advised Agent Wynar last night that I believe he should be arrested. That is putting it mildly. My friends think the FBI should seize his and Jackson’s computers.

    The reason you are copied in on this email is because you and I did not have an agreement that I would stop writing Gianelli/Blogonaut, stop correcting the lies and slander, or that I should stop emailing Jackson. You advised me to remove Jackson from my emails for ten days. And, you suggested that I ignore Gianelli/Blogonaut. Would you, as I asked Agent Wynar, permit this individual to lie about you, your children, contact the Boulder Police Department about your son’s email, threaten your sister and her husband, urge LAPD and Boulder PD to arrest and/or target me further, and then sit back and do nothing? I find it impossible to believe that any human being, any parent, any daughter or son, would sit by idly while terrorists attempt to destroy their lives and their credibility – while targeting their children and family members.

    This man is twisted. He is sadistic. And, trust me, he has motive.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
    Subject: Re: You are now in Sunnyvale, CA
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “Rutger Penick”
    Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 5:03 PM

    November 20, 2009

    Ms: Lynch:

    The undersigned has been subjected to more slander from you that anyone should be required to endure.

    When you represented in September that you would stop sending emails to us and Mr. Jackson, Blogonaut deleted 4 posts and stopped posting about you.

    Your emails stopped until a couple days ago, but you continued to disparage the undersigned and Blogonaut on your two twisted blogs with dozens of additional posts falsely accusing licensed attorneys of various felony offenses.

    This is called libel per se, meaning that the plaintiff need not prove economic loss to prevail and to recover general and punitive damages.

    I know that you do not care if you are sued—you have an unpaid $9,000,000.00 judgment against you and have violated several restraining orders in multiple instances, so one more lawsuit is not going to be of concern to you.

    But it will concern Karen Lynch, David McCourt, and your eldest son—all of whom you have stated in writing have been supporting and encouraging your Internet activities—because if another word is posted about either Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, I will be suing not only you, but also Karen, David, and your son and we can let the court sort out whether you told the truth by claiming they have aided and abetted your serial libel.

    In the meantime, we have nothing more to say to you and we will not respond to any more of your pathological communications.

    If you care at all about Karen, David, and your son, you will cease and desist.

    –Stephen R. Gianelli

  95. Stephen R. Gianelli Says:

    To cut to the chase:

    1. Kelley Lynch ha already sent over 400 emails to the IRS, the Justice Department, state attorney’s general, local DA’s, Treasury Agent Kelley Sopko, governors, mayors, media outlets and a hundred other email recipients falsely accusing me of “cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation”, and other serious felony crimes.

    2. She started doing this because she hijacked a blog that I am counsel for, Blogonaut, posted 60+ items falsely accusing various persons of serious crimes (manufacturing meth, child molestation, tax fraud, and other crimes) and was then banned from the blog. I then addressed Kelley Lynch’s emails and attempted comments on the blog that she had apprised high profile attorney Bruce Cutler of the situation and had asked him to look into suing Blogonaut.

    I sent Cutler a letter, he immediately phoned me, and we thereafter had several cordial telephone conversations wherein Cutler made it clear that he did not represent Lynch, he did not know Lynch, he had never even spoken to or written Lynch, but that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him 10 to 20 very long harassing voice messages for him EVERY DAY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, and that Mr. Cutler regarded Kelley Lynch as the “worst telephone stalker I have ever encountered”. Cutler also told me that Lynch had been sending him hundreds of very long (50+ page) unsolicited and ranting faxes daily for several months until his office complained to her then employer, who stopped the faxes from Lynch’s workplace.

    3. Kelley Lynch cc’d Blogonaut with scores of emails to high profile security consultant to Phil Spector Bill Pavelic, including a very disturbing email wherein Lynch, in the conversational style of old, good friends, asked that he assemble a team of investigators to investigate me, several Cohen attorneys, and man other persons. I emailed Bill Pavelic who informed me that he had absolutely no association with Kelley Lynch “who is obviously a very disturbed woman”.

    4. I emailed Treasury Agent Sopko, who called me back to advise that I should not be concerned with the scores of emails by Kelley Lynch to her demanding my arrest and prosecution because no reasonable person would regard Kelley Lynch as credible.

    5. I have been in touch with an FBI agent who told me I had nothing to fear from Ms. Lynch’s many reports to the FBI because Lynch was a “classic 5150” (cop talk for nut job).

    6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.

    7. Kelley Lynch is a very sick and disturbed person, who in the past 48 hours has sent me and/or the blog I represent over 50 emails, several to her own family members (including her sister and son) cc to me, stating that her family members support her internet activities 100%, and that her eldest son (Rutger) is “eager” to join in a lawsuit against me, Blogonaut, and others. It is Lynch who involved her family in this very public slow motion meltdown hers, and not me or my client.

    8. We were advised by the Treasury Department and the FBI to simply ignore Kelley Lynch, but enough is enough.

    Personally, I have had it up to here, and will no longer remain silent about this internet and spam email bully—as mentally disturbed as she obviously is.

    –Stephen R. Gianelli
    415.929.5130

  96. Sydney Says:

    Thank you for taking the time and energy needed to hopefully thrust some reality into Kelley and her madness-fed emails and blog posts. I’ve noticed since your previous post that her blog has pretty much been silent and she hasn’t posted anything more here either. Of course, this isn’t the first time she’s been silenced by threats of repercussions, but perhaps this one will stop her, or at least, if someone in her family realizes how deep she is in this crap, they will find a way to stop her. At any rate, I’m glad to see you will not take anymore of this nonsense.

    Kelley, if you’re reading this (and I’m sure you are) this is your chance to back out gracefully, and then do something that will enable you to re-build your life. I think you have hit your bottom, and if you are willing to let go of the past, the only way you can go is up.

  97. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Like Sidney I feel great sympathy and respect for Stephen Gianelli, he has certainly been very patient and forgiving and it is very understandable that he now feels enough is enough.
    Sadly I don’t share Sidney’s optimism that this warning will deter Kelley Lynch from further harassment and slander of Mr. Gianelli, Mr. Cohen and others. I believe her illsness is so advanced that she can understand no other reasoning but her own. I believe the only thing that can save Kelley (and her victims) is a major intervention involving her family, mental health care professionals and possible law enforcement.
    I truely hope her family has enough love and courage to initiate such and intervention.
    Susanne

  98. Kelly Green Says:

    Bravo to Mr. Gianelli and Blogonaut! Finally someone is putting the skids to this cyberterrorist. Since she always threatens to, someday, sue most of us and she spams most of those she intends to sue, could her email bullying be construed as witness intimidation? Oh, well, I’m sure until she reaches her next destination, she’ll be quiet—she has a pattern of fleeing to other locations and re-establishing her cyberterrorism.

    I know the holidays are approaching. However, I’m truly, truly saddened that, as of yet, no one in her life cares about her enough or loves her enough to get her psychiatric help. From experience, I know it’s neither easy nor pleasant to insist a loved one get psychiatric care—but it must be done. I sure Kelley’s family would prefer to be involved in anything but this situation. Joan, Karen, David, and Rutger it’s now time for you to step-up and commence the actions that will ensure Kelley gets the help she so desperately needs. It won’t be easy (perhaps the SOH will assist you) but you and everyone in cyberspace know it must be done. If you are unable to do so, perhaps once she settles in her next location total strangers will step-up-to-the-plate and begin Chapter 51 proceedings (5150). Clearly, the time has come for you to insist Kelley get professional help.

  99. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I will respond to any legal complaint and intend to subpoena Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Agent Wynar – FBI, Agent Sopko – Treasury, Agent Tejeda – IRS Los Angeles, and – of course – Leonard Cohen.

    My son didn’t say he wants to join me in a suit against Blogonaut. He wants to join me in a lawsuit against other parties that he has been damaged by. He can speak to his own attorneys about any damages that may have arisen due to the communications he has received from Gianelli-Blogonaut.

    I have just left a message for Agent Wynar/FBI Oakland with respect to Gianelli’s public allegations. With respect to Agent Sopko-Treasury: she can speak for herself and the Treasury. She cannot speak for me and she most certainly cannot speak for Phil Spector.

    Put your money where your mouth is Gianelli and file your legal complaint and email it to me. I will accept service via email and I will absolutely see you in court and will absolutely subpoena the individuals I have listed above and others.

    My family thinks you are completely out of your mind.

    With respect to Susanne Walsh and Sydney – please continue to speak to one another. Perhaps – you two who do not know me at all – can appear in court as his witnesses.

    Kelley Lynch

  100. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, my sister and her husband did not write and ask me to cease anything. I have spoken with Rutger and Gianelli is misrepresenting him – as usual. I don’t know Bill Pavelic and am uninterested in what he has to say. He worked for Phil Spector and Phillip is my friend. Bill Pavelic was his investigator. With respect to Bruce Cutler – he can take the stand for himself and testify that Gianelli has accurate represented their conversations. I will ask Phil Spector to invoke that privilege.

    Joff Belark, Gianelli’s lying “reporter,” wrote to say I’m in Sunnyvale, California. That is – as usual – a lie.

    Kelley Lynch

  101. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianneli,

    Just to correct a few more lies. Karen and David McCourt have never advised me, nor have I confirmed this for you, that they support any internet activity of mine.

    I continue to personally believe that you have engaged in cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation,” and a coercive attempt to put me in touch with Leonard Cohen who you stated was willing to help me.

    I did not hijack your Blog. I posted positive remarks about Phil Spector and the truth about Leonard Cohen. I also attempted to respond to Joff Belark’s lie disguised as an article. It is slander and nothing else. Freda Guttman repeated Lorca Cohen’s accusations that her father molested her. My friend Michael confirmed that the FBI in Dallas was investigating his uncle for possible connections to meth labs. Michael himself write me and the DOJ was copied in that his uncle is extremely dangerous and the FBI was already investigating his connection to a possible murder. What is frivolous about that and what would you know about that?

    Bruce Cutler, as I’ve said, was Phil Spector’s attorney. I intend to print this Blog’s comments – yours in particular – out and mail them with a letter to Phil Spector. He can address anything that has to do with Bruce Cutler and me – including your deranged letter to him which I view as your attempt to further insert yourself into his matter. Your call to Investigator Frayeh is evidence of that as well. And then there are your communications with Cohen’s advisers. Clearly these are serious issues. Bruce Cutler did not send a complaint to my employer about my faxes. I received a note from his office and he was not a complaint. I have a copy of that and will file that in response to any legal complaint I receive from you or my own complaint that I will file against you.

    Bill Pavelic does not know me. “Disturbed” hardly begins to describe how I feel about the targeting of my children.

    Sopko has no legal right to discuss my views on anything. She can speak for herself and I will speak for myself. I continue to believe your actions with respect to me should be investigated and no one on earth will convince me otherwise.

    I will subpoena the conversation you had with Agent Wynar to confirm this. Agent Wynar might be a nut job if he said this and doesn’t see right through you.

    I don’t know if you are sick and disturbed or merely a criminal.

    Maybe the Treasury and FBI can tell Phil Spector that he shouldn’t investigate why you contacted Investigator Frayeh who was an investigator in his “murder” trial since they have plenty to say on so many matters.

    You are going to prove every single allegation you have raised, Gianelli, and if you think I won’t respond to any legal complaint, subpoena the parties I’ve listed above and possibly others, then you don’t know me. I will also demand a jury trial.

    Kelley Lynch

  102. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, I am a little surprised that you are not taking the current issues more seriously. Baiting someone to sue you for libel is a very foolish thing to do. If you think Mr. Gianelli is joking about this situation you are very, very mistaken. The more posts from you denigrating him and/or Blogonaut, the more evidence he/they have to present at Court. This is a serious situation and you need to heed the warnings you have been given about your behavior. You will not get served this suit be email, you will be personally served. You cannot run and hide from this as you have done in the past when faced with legal consequences for your behavior and actions. Do keep in mind that your son, sister and brother-in-lay will be co-defendants in this suit and if you do not show, they will have to pay for your activities. Your present postings contain lies about all this – i.e, you saying you don’t know Bill Pavelic. Your past postings prove that to be a lie. And this is not the only lie you have told for the past several years. I cannot speak for Susanne Walsh nor for Kelly Green, but I can speak for myself. If Mr. Gianelli sees any way I can be of service in his suit against you, I will be happy to do so. The gig is up Kelley. It’s payback time. Your silence from this point on is the only option you have if you want to avoid public exposure of your hatefulness and self-absorbed rantings. If you will not withdraw because of the penalties you will face, at least think about your family members and the penalties they will face because of you.

  103. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, save it for someone who cares – like Gianelli.

    Kelley Lynch

  104. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli,

    File the legal complaint. I look forward to my legal response and calling Cohen to the stand. It shouldn’t be hard to subpoena Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan – they’re in the Bay Area. I think I’ll also subpoena Dale Burgess who knows that Cohen offered me 50% community property – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers. A laughable notion based upon his disdain for ordinary income taxes – and that’s before we get into his hatred of “gift taxes.” Put your money where your mouth is: write your complaint, file it, and post it here. I’ll respond and will subpoena the individuals I’ve mentioned. Agent Wynar can explain his comments to you.

    My son, sister, and brother-in-law haven’t said anything about Gianelli so it might be hard to sue them for anything. Rutger did, however, write Gianelli that he thought he was threatening him. I’ll ask Rutger’s attorneys to take a look at Gianelli’s postings and threats.

    I’m not baiting anyone and speaking the truth is not libel. You, on the other hand, have lied and slandered me and we will see who prevails in court.

    Kelley Lynch

  105. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Gianelli, call up the Dallas FBI and have a laugh over Michael’s uncle. Maybe you can insert yourself into that situation also.

  106. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, Sydney, I don’t know Bill Pavelic. He sent me some emails – a couple about Phil Spector, one about some utterly abusive situation with a Swedish woman and the Los Angeles District Attorney (that he called more profound than Phillip’s set up) and some others. So, I’m not lying. I don’t know him. He has said the same.

    I am noting, Sydney, that you are threatening my family members.

    Why continue with the banter. Gianelli should file his lawsuit and I will respond. That’s what the justice system is for. Gianelli is going to prove that he is a pathelogical liar who has inserted himself into Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal and the Phil Spector trial. I also intend to subpoena Investigator Frayeh. Gianelli should know that I can subpoena people – that is my legal right. He cannot, in court, speak for Wynar, the FBI, Sopko, or the Treasury. That is hearsay. These people will be forced to testify and explain their comments. It’s that simple.

    I want to go over Cohen’s residence issues with him on the stand in the Lynch and Gianelli matter. I want to be certain he’s actually a resident – since he abandoned a green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and obtained a new one in 1991. Also, because issues with perjury are serious and possible prior bad acts I want to review his numerous social security issues. He shouldn’t have any difficulty remembering his residence issues and how he filed tax returns with the green card he abandoned. I don’t think these are issues you can address, Sydney and I personally think you are a seriously unstable person.

    Kelley Lynch

    Fifth Amendment Rights of Resident and Non-Resident Aliens
    Resident Aliens. A resident alien enjoys the rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment that would be afforded any citizen and a resident alien may invoke these rights in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory. Among the rights bestowed under the Fifth Amendment is the right to refuse to give any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used.” United States. v. Balsys, 524 U.S. 666 (1998); Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 444-45 (1972) Kwong Hat Chew v. Colding 344 U.S. 590 (1953).

  107. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, who cares if I am personally served the lawsuit. What is that – a threat? I will personally respond to the lawsuit and I will subpoena people – including Agent Wynar to explain his comments. It’s very straightforward Sydney. How could you be of any help to Gianelli? You don’t know me and you are lying about me, gossiping, and you appear to be threatening me and my family? Stop gossiping and tell Gianelli to file his Complaint. I will respond. I will request a jury trial. I will subpoena the people I have noted above. And I definitely will appear in Court. I understand how the legal system works and Gianelli, you, and others, are not my judge and jury. The judge and jury will be the judge and jury. The trial lawyer, Gianelli, should understand this. He should also understand slander but apparently doesn’t. That’s not my problem. A jury will decide the issues – based on evidence and witness testimony. Not you. Not Gianelli. And not the “feds.” Kelley Lynch

  108. Kelley Lynch Says:

    http://law.jrank.org/pages/10304/Sixth-Amendment-Compulsory-Process-Favorable-Witnesses.html

  109. Kelly Green Says:

    I have questioned your sanity; however, I never believed you to be stupid. I was wrong.

    It’s time for you to take other posters seriously. It’s time for you to be concerned about your family–think about how much your actions are going to cost them. Can they afford to pay for your actions?

  110. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, who cares what you’ve questioned. You do not know me and you have not reviewed the evidence I sent to the IRS and others. You do not have the corporate books, records, notarized documents, etc. and you probably do not know Cohen. I do and I know what I’ve witnessed for approximately 20 years. That includes his utter disdain for ordinary income taxes, the laws of this country, and – obviously – perjury. Someone was horrified this morning when they heard how he targeted me and my children and noted that he is a con artist. That sums him up perfectly.

    I am not taking you seriously. I don’t know you and I could care less about you. I am merely noting that you continue to threaten my family and I have asked Phawker to maintain copies of all IP addresses. That is very very straightforward. I am going into Court and if they are named – sobeit. I will address that with the Court and I will have my sister and brother-in-law on the phone. Gianelli should be well aware that the Court can include people in trials and hearings telephonically. I am taking his threat to litigate this seriously and actually look forward to responding to his garbage, lies, and slander – in the proper venue. He should take this seriously – the fact that I intend to subpoena Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler (telephonically), Phil Spector (telephonically), Agent Wynar-FBI, Agent Sopko-Treasury (telephonically), Agent Tejeda-IRS (telephonically), and of course – Cohen. I would prefer him to attend telephonically (as I requested when I noticed him properly of the Special Meeting of Traditional Holdings, LLC which he chose not to attend and did not provide evidence of his investment in that entity … because it doesn’t exist), and others.

    You’re right. I’m not stupid. I also don’t have “motive.”

    I want the Court to pay particular attention to the threats being issued against my son, Rutger. And, of course, a jury. It horrifies ordinary human beings but then so does this entire situation.

    Kelley Lynch

  111. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, like Kelly Green, I never thought of you as a stupid person. That has all changed, however. No one on this blog or any of the multiple other blogs you post your nonsense to has ever threatened you or anyone in your family. All the threats have been made by YOU. Anyone who disagrees with you gets threatened. Anyone who posts a comment disputing your slanderous comments gets threatened. The list goes on ad nauseam. I thought you were an intelligent woman who simply got into some trouble and as a result, made some bad choices by taking your emotion-based delusions to the internet. Not anymore. If indeed you were once an intelligent, functioning adult, you are no longer that person. I feel sorry for you; I also feel sorry for your sons and your sister and brother-in-law, but mostly I feel sorry for your mother. I can only imagine how ashamed and embarrassed she must be to have her daughter toss everything she ever taught her about honor, dignity and truth get thrown in the garbage like you have done to her. Shame on you Kelley Lynch, shame on you.

  112. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, how do you reconcile your statements about my family (threats actually) with Blogonaut/Gianelli’s who seem to be one and the same. Are you saying you have legal issues with me. I tend to doubt that unless a court thinks they can tell me that I am not permitted to perceive people who act like thug morons as just that. Maybe the thought police can declare my perceptions illegal. Perhaps, as well, Gianelli would like to post my sister’s letter which I intend to subpoena from him since I didn’t receive one. I saw Rutger’s – he asked Gianelli/Blogonaut to stop contacting him and noted that he felt he was being “threatened.”

    Kelley Lynch

    6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.

  113. Kelley Lynch Says:

    If you feel sorry for my Mother then you will understand that she thinks you are insane and unstable people who are targeting her family. I think what people understand is that I am an intelligent woman who made the “unfortunate” decision to report Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS, supplied the IRS with evidence, and made some decisions based on the fact that DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess confirmed what I suspected – that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and “exposed” me to it. This is so easy for everyone I speak with to follow. I understand that Cohen’s fans and people with motive or an interest in preserving his credibility don’t want to acknowledge this.

    Since you don’t know my family would you mind refraining from speaking on their behalf. Your intuitive statements made on behalf of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan might be acceptable – to them – but I know my family and know how they feel. I might note, at this point, that they also happen to know Cohen. In fact, my Mother sees right through him.

    Kelley Lynch

    I thought you were an intelligent woman who simply got into some trouble and as a result, made some bad choices by taking your emotion-based delusions to the internet.

  114. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Of course, I also wasn’t in Sunnyvale, California and, of course, can also prove this. I never said it was a federal crime to threaten litigation. I said I think Gianelli, Blogonaut, and others have engaged in what I personally believe is obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness intimidation, witness retaliation, harassment, cyber-stalking, stalking, etc. I also happen to believe Gianelli-Blogonaut made a coercive offer to put me in touch with Cohen who was apparently willing to help me. He only has to pay me what he owes me. That too is very very straightforward. The assets were valued by Moss Adams numerous times so the forensic accounting I have requested shouldn’t be that difficult. Zia Modabber didn’t even think it would be that expensive. Zia Modabber, an attorney I met with, understood this: artist management partings are like divorces. And that’s probably why Cohen likes it when people say I am a whore, alcoholic, drug addict, etc. Perhaps he should take a good hard look in the mirror and check out what’s reflected back. This is truly becoming a “we see right through you but you don’t think we do” situation. The fact that Cohen, a Canadian, decided to live in the United States appears to be a dead giveaway as to his tax fraud. The fact that Cohen has affiliated himself with all of you – and in particular “Gianelli” – is further evidence to me that the man is positively insane and deranged. Then again, there’s “Kory” – a laughable excuse for a lawyer. As someone said: “Does Cohen actually pay for his legal advice?” I know he didn’t pay Peter Lopez the $90,000 he owed him for the CAK bond deal that so concerned Robert Kory. Kelley Lynch

    from Joff Belark
    to Kelley Lynch
    date Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:32 AM
    subject Re: IRS Commissioner’s Staff – “to protect his assets from the taxman!!!”
    mailed-by gmail.com
    signed-by gmail.com
    hide details Nov 20 (2 days ago)
    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    It is not strange at all.

    Every time you send someone an email, the Internet Protocol address (“IP” address) of the computer that you sent the email from, and the location of that IP address can be quite easily retrieved with the use of the right software. Every computer has one, and the IP address is unique.

    By way of illustration and example, the header from this email was analyzed with the result below:

    Analysis:

    Return-Path:
    Received: from web43407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (web43407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [68.180.198.211]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id 7si5118647iwn.76.2009.11.20.09.59.11; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:59:12 -0800 (PST)
    Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com designates 68.180.198.211 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.180.198.211;
    Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com designates 68.180.198.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
    Received: (qmail 90889 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2009 17:59:11 -0000
    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258739951; bh=dOTmpEnG2i6XcaueUxfquYVK1AMub8ssAleVoO1SLWg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QQN9b5xjIMNShpzfmIPYnHUnh+zzOrtg7hcgdZ1lkm1rutJGk/E3sN17npgIF6pPDmj4TCX4QTCP1YX/3/DY52IPrpoWGi/CiymNwmx0CiF4FjTU9sf+7BqGea0+xnALTrvz60WuHzvxXLGyE6Qpxtgl04yMJMt7Xo72v2MXI+c=
    DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iQOwGv/Z9rluu7xZxhPNz9ekXMU9rvH9Kxz5KWMQiSRyjkoPUtElvaNL9ZgdsK32sLj11R7G2Akr8UblZodvWwRfBinru0tFMAtqqsAb6qmYiAIAU61qpdWNQIfJg5iiOUcbYf+k9qVH6+EsxLKm74XH4qOSSm5oG8gMyWdfNgk=;
    Message-ID:
    X-YMail-OSG: SR5bV0MVM1nTpN71u.SIXpnTntQ1rCIXD5Lbbo0ZWBr6udG92OVVB8IrnCPwiZeozXLfwPVGByvk4tKDFLTfnQ8E919lDhtWzG1t3znGSl_HeUfqOLMl9.epAqdOq_vx5YLH8khI8EPv671aAPsqWCC3asmdIj9B75F3HwnzvwcQ3PxcmO_JYhs2SDJXLqUPPvMleN7GsIoH.VvlWWUzoOnhRcjlQHnO9vaiQcyKAw3q7TgbFmN4naBh4CKVHffvpm3IwW1MpYryWOCk8SV0oa1J_SNpVS41UNHs21ek0gbk4zzt6h8v99CA4WzFfvoP_48fDaoiBK4F7r3sejtnd.IQS1iAAUrZzcfY7A–
    Received: from [68.142.215.21] by web43407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:59:10 PST
    X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
    Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:59:10 -0800 (PST)
    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – Gianelli\’s Definitely Threatening My Family
    To: STEPHEN GIANELLI , blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, joffbelark@gmail.com
    Cc: doronweinberg , Dennis , ASKDOJ , \”*irs. commissioner\” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Jewel of Activity , Blogonaut Law-Blog , STEPHEN GIANELLI , Joff Belark , mayor@cityofhouston.net, \”Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov\” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, karen@mccourt.org, david@mccourt.org, mpduke1@msn.com, dbergman@bergman-law.com, teresa.low@doj.ca.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, pio@lapd.lacity.org, oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org, chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, governor@governor.ca.gov, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, becknerm , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, Maurice Smith , moseszzz@mztv.com, Duane , rand.hoffman@umusic.com, lwieseltier@tnr.com
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\”0-1401337968-1258739950=:88881\”

    Source:
    The source host name is “r1.ycpi.mud.yahoo.net” and the source IP address is 68.142.215.21.

    Geo-Location Information

    Country
    United States
    State/Region
    CA
    City
    Sunnyvale
    Postal Code
    94089
    Latitude
    37.4249
    Longitude
    -122.0074
    Area Code
    408

    One can then easily look up further information about the subject computer’s IP address:

    68.142.215.22 – Geo Information
    IP Address
    68.142.215.22
    Host
    r2.ycpi.mud.yahoo.net
    Location
    US, United States
    City
    Sunnyvale, CA 94089
    Organization
    Inktomi Corporation
    ISP
    Inktomi Corporation
    AS Number
    AS14780

    At the request of our attorney I am not going to be responding to further emails. However, if you do not wish to be “tracked” then you should stop sending emails to persons whom you do now wish to know your whereabouts.

    And BTW, if it was a federal crime for an attorney to threaten litigation, there would be no lawyers. A comforting thought to some, perhaps, but hardly the law.

    All the best,

    JB

  115. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. I think Belark, proving himself to be a moron, found Inktomi. I’m very happy to see that Belark continues to view my emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others as a joke and a game.

  116. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, don’t you think that if your accusations of “taxfraudthatIwastoldiscriminal” was in any way seen as having any merit that the IRS would have taken action by now? It has been a number of years and yet, no charges, no investigation, no nothing from the IRS. Doesn’t any of that sink into your brain? Now, I know I’m repeating what numerous people have stated numerous times over the past several years, but won’t you please just look into this? Your accusations have no merit – not to the IRS, the Treasury, the DOJ, the FBI, and the numerous others you constantly bother with your mass mailings. Give it up already – the world is tired of you. It’s time to re-embrace life, get your head screwed on straight, and get a grip. Enough already…

  117. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Not necessarily. In fact, a number of excellent attorneys have informed me that one issue with the IRS is that they are slow. In fact, that has been the main issue certain attorneys have raised. So no – this does not prove that the IRS views Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal) as meritless. How would you know that there is no investigation? Do you work for the IRS? This is precisely what I want Agent Tejeda to address on the witness stand. Can he publicly discuss a pending IRS matter or investigation prior to it being made public and/or a complaint filed in court. That should be a very simple question for Agent Tejeda to respond to. I also want to ask him if the IRS takes allegations of criminal tax fraud with penalties & interest in the vicinity of $30 million lightly, etc. I won’t look into your scenario. I intend to look into mine.

    I see you are now speaking, publicly, on behalf of the IRS, the Treasury, the DOJ, and the FBI and I find that unacceptable and unwise. Nevertheless, that is their business – not mine. How can you say that my accusations have no merit to these agencies? Would you like to give me the agent’s name and badge number who told you this?

    My head is screwed on straight. I know this bothers Cohen’s fan club and other people with motive to keep him credible and to crucify Phil Spector. It’s obvious. Please only speak for yourself. I think it’s rather imprudent to speak for others.

    Kelley Lynch

  118. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli, since you’ve decided to publicly post on Phawker about me I want you to be clear about this – anything you put in the mail that contains one lie about me or any type of fraudulent information at all will promptly be reported to the U.S. Postal Inspector. You are grandstanding, you are a liar, and you have slandered me and I will prove this in a court of law. You and your cyber-terrorist support group should understand this – I look forward to meeting you in court and my ultimate goal will be to see you disbarred for what you have done here – particularly as I personally am convinced that you have targeted my son Rutger who has lost his fingers and been through an unconscionable ordeal.

    Kelley Lynch

  119. Kelley Lynch Says:

    And Ms. Green, I intend to subpoena Dale Burgess. He was my accountant, who is in the Bay Area, and he witnessed the offer of 50% community property that Robert Kory, who had extraordinary negotiating power (according to Robert Kory) on behalf of Leonard Cohen. Dale Burgess can also explain to Gianelli, on the stand, why he felt there was fraud on all of Cohen’s “entities,” why he didn’t believe I was a partner on LC Investments, LLC, why he believes the assets are still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., and why he believed Criminal Intelligence of the IRS should be involved in Cohen’s tax fraud matter, and why he felt I should be in the witness protection program. He can also explain why he wanted me to advise the IRS and Treasury that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud. What they can explain to the IRS is why they wanted me to make a deal with Cohen. If you’re not a tax lawyer you might want to consult one before you post another lame, bogus remark. Kelley Lynch

  120. Kelley Lynch Says:

    From: Kelley Lynch

    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
    Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 4:00 AM

    Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    I intend to report anyone who uses the U.S. mail to fraudulent target me (via lawsuits or whatever) to the Postal Inspector – that includes Gianelli. I also intend to subpoena any and all communications (emails, etc.) between Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark and Alan Jackson, the District Attorney’s Office, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers.

    Love,
    Kelley

  121. Kelly Green Says:

    Who in her right mind routinely signs correspondence to lawyers she’s never met “love”?

    Ah, Lynch’s cyberterrorism continues. Where to begin…let’s see, at least twice you’ve instructed Phawker to save my IP address–let all in cyberspace know how those subpoenas are coming. Since you are living in a shelter, you can’t begin to pay for the subpoena service you’re going to need. I PROMISE you, if I’m served a subpoena I will report to court (thou you will, by law, have to pay for my travel and lodging) and MY ATTORNEY WILL IMMEDIATELY ASK THE JUDGE TO ORDER YOU TO SUBMIT TO A 5150 HEARING. ANY THE JUDGE WILL GRANT MY REQUEST–and your website will be all the proof I need. Apparently, none of you family or friends care enough about you to force you to get psych help–so I guess I, A TOTAL STRANGER, will be the one person to force the issue.

    You’ve recently made reference to the need to subpeona a communiqe between you sister and Gianelli. It’s interesting that your family is now reaching out to those you claim terrorize them. As ususal, you are the only person who is a threat to your family.

    On your webite you’ve gone to great pains to tell everyone that you want your family and the Feds to testify via telephone. Why don’t you want your family in the courtroom with you? Most families make a point of attending–you know they make sure you get your hair done and get you a new dress–inotherwords, they go out of their way to make their loved one is cleaned up so they appear credible. Again, why don’t you want them at your side?

    I’m sure it won’t be long before, once again, Google shuts down you website. Perhaps Blogonaut will report you for theft. Once again, you have stolen from Blogonaut–and thanks to your links, this time, without any doubt, you’ve made a deliberate attempt to hijack his website. You seem to think that as long as you cite the source, it’s ok to steal things from other website and post that material on your sites. Well it’s not ok. It’s not ok to steal from Blogonaut; it’s not ok to steal from Phawker; and it’s not ok to steal from The New York Times. You’ve committed theft–copywrite infringement–theft of copywrited material. You have a narcissistic need for others to respond to you; however, you don’t have the guts or courage to open you websites to comments. You have a need to engage others but you don’t have the guts to do it on your turf.

    How does that old adage go, “Once a thief….”

  122. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, you are always full of excuses for your behavior, and I’m quite sure you will be full of excuses when the time comes for all your subpoenas to be served on people. You won’t be in court to defend your unspeakable behavior and there will be no subpoenas served on your behalf. That’s because you have no case against anyone. And even if you did, you don’t have the resources to get those subpoenas served nor to pay for transportation for the people to come testify. You are a pathetic and sorry excuse for a woman, a mother, a sister and a daughter. Of course you want all those people to testify by phone – because you know good and well they won’t come to court and say what your delusions tell you they ought to say. You don’t mind exposing your entire family to embarrassment and shame, but I believe they have a serious problem with causing themselves any more shame. Give it up Kelley. Now that someone has finally decided to take action against you, do yourself a favor and be quiet. Every word you post anywhere on the internet will be used against you. Hopefully, as Kelly Green has said, someone will find enough love or caring in his/her heart to force a Chapter 51 action on you.

  123. Susanne Walsh Says:

    In Kelley Lynch’s limited univers exist only two types of people: The perpetrators and the victims. In spite of the fact that she herself initiated this ongoing bizarre discussion on various internet blogs, where she in an unusual mean-spirited and cruel way has made accusations and allegations about many people, she consider herself and her family the “victims”.
    The “perpetrators are of couse Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Stephan Gianelli, Joff Belark and several casual bloggers who objects to her attacks, lies and slander. “We” are, in Ms. Lynch’s own words, criminals, thugs, maniacs, insane, stupid, hysterical, liars, slanderers, perjurers and much more.
    The people Ms. Lynch considers sane, normal, ordinary, truthful, are her Mother, David, Karen, Rutger, Steven Segal, Philip Spector (and one of P.S.’s X-wives also a “dear friend”) Ann Diamond (whose slanderous gossip she continuously repeats), her “spiritual teachers and advisors” and of course “all the people who knows that Leonard Cohen is a dangerous, mean, talentless phony criminal”. She claims that all these people KNOW she (Lynch) is telling the truth and support her internet bullying.
    Now what I find interesting is that in the several months I have been following this “ping-pong game” on the internet and read literally hundreds of postings disagreeing with Ms. Lynch perception of the truth, and have defended Leonard Cohen, Stephen Gianelli and others who have been brutally abused, but I have not seen one single post or mail condoning, supporting or defending Kelley Lynch and her behavior.
    Ms. Lynch where are all these “sane, normal” people who support you and believe in you? Why are they not coming forward and defending you and your credibility?
    NOT ONE SINGLE SUPPORTER Ms. Lynch, doesn’t that indicate that you are pretty much alone in this battle?
    Susanne

  124. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydey, I am not full of excuses. I am merely addressing lies, slander, defamation, libel, and fraud. What excuse will I need when Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Treasury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Phi Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Dale Burgess, Cohen, and possibly others. You are really underestimating me if you think I won’t be in court to respond to Gianeli/Blogonaut’s garbage lies. Assume what you will. How can you speak for my parents or children? You have no idea who we are. Agent Wynar-FBI Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Dale Burgess are all in the Bay Area so it will be quite easy for them to make their way to court. We are living in an age when court’s are quite comfortable with telephonic hearings/trials.

    I think they will come to court because they will have to answer a subpoena. They are going o testify in response to what is currently Gianelli-Blogonaut’s hearsay allegations. I could care less if Gianelli files a suit against me. In fact, I look foward to it. Every word he has spoken, written, communicated is a lie. His and your threats will not silence me.

    You have it correct – everthing being said on the internet is going to be raised as an issue in a court of law. That includes your inssane Chapter 51 action. Who is going to force me into that position? Not Steven Clark Lindsey. He is already so far in over his head that one can safely assume he has no way out. He inserted himself into Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal and the Phil Spector st up and he is backed intoa corner.

    If Agent Wynar actually said I am a classic 5150 candidate he should hire a personal attorney to represent him and he should be forced to undergo psychiatric evaluations. Perhaps an expert would like to explain how Wynar, a total stranger, drew his conclusions. I intend to find out why he is gossiping about me with parties who definitely seem to have motive to undermine me and what FBI policy permits him to slander me.

    Kelley Lynch

  125. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh – let me address your lies. I am documenting them for the reasons Green noted above. They are going to be raised in court and they have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This may be impossible – given the fact that you, Green, Blogonaut, Gianelli, Blaine, and other cyber-terrorists do not know me or my family at al. I did not initiate the slander and lies about me on the internet. That honor goes to Leonard Cohen and Steven Clark Lindsey. I think it’s safe to say that Gianelli, Kory, and Belark have participated. I am not convinced you are not a criminal to me, Ms. Walsh. I have advised you that I believe you are a cult victim and an idiotic moron. I am, however, convinced that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, Gianelli, and Belark have engaged in criminal conduct including, but not limited to, obtruction of justice, witness tampering, witness inimidation, witness retaliation, coercion, blackmail, bribery, harassment, perjury, fraud, collusion, intentional torts, slander, cyber-terrorism, stalking, harassment, and some form of terrorism and – probably – much more. I happen to know for a fact that they are liars. I don’t know if they’re hysterical but if this isn’t a prank they should, at the very least, be concerned that serious-minded intelligent people are witnessing this insanity.

    I don’t know that I’ve engaged in any “conversation” about the sanity o my Mother, sister, her husband, my son, Phil Spector, Janis Zavala Spector, or Steven Segal but now that you mention it – yes, I think they are sane. I can’t really address Ann Diamond’s sanity. I don’t know her personally but the article she wrote was highly readable and essentially factual. Her tales of Cohen targeting her, slandering her, and attempting to destroy her life, and what she thinks Cohen is capable of rang true. I have forwarded those emails to the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and – of course – Phil Spector’s legal team. It’s safe to say that Cohen – who has destroyed my life because I had the audacity to report his tax fraud that I was told is criminal, probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury (and makes an appearance in prosecution documents), and targeted my children and parents, is dangerous, unstable, and capable of anything.

    Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche are inconceivably great teachers.

    I have not and do not speak for others and have not “claimed” who knows what. That would be speculative and irrelevant in a court of law – unless you’re engaged in the Phil Spector matter where gossip and hearsay has somehow become fact

    Why should people support me on the internet? People will come forward when I file my lawsuits. That will be when the attorney I am consulting decides. At that time – they will come forward to testify in the proper venue – a court of law. No. This does not indicate that I am alone in my battles. It indicates that I’m on the front line, taking the direct hits, and some cowards are hiding while other brave people are witnessing this deranged and malicious scenario. Your capital letters underscore nothing other than your stupidity.

    Kelley Lynch

  126. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, is this now a legal issue – how I sign my letters?

    I have not instructed Phawker to do anything. I have emailed Phawker requesting that they maintain all IP address information relating to this Blog’s comments in connection with me, the Leonard Cohen Criminal Tax Fraud Matter, and the Phil Spector set up. I did not instruct them to “save” your IP address, Ms. Green. I did not specify names. How I handle a subpoena is not your business and all this talk about Gianelli’s garbage suit is tedious. He should file the lawsuit and put his money where his mouth is. I think we’ve addressed this point ad nauseum. I have no idea why you are talking about your lawyer but perhaps you have delusions of grandeur and believe you are relevant. You have no idea what the judge will or will not grant but your arrogance is coming across loud and clear. A judge and jury may wonder why a total stranger has inserted itself into this mater. My sister didn’t write Gianelli and/or me and I want to force the issue in court to prove that Gianelli, as usual, is lying.

    I didn’t say I don’t want my family in the court room, did I? I have merely noted who I intend to subpoena. I’ll be sure to instruct “the feds” to have their hair done, dress nicely, and to be sure to bring snacks and iPods for the boring downtime.

    I’ll note for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Google’s legal team that my Blogs and email accounts may targeted in the not too distant future. I have stolen from Blogonaut? How? I thought it was a Blog parading as Stephen Gianelli, an attorney. I have no idea what you are talking about with respect to Gianelli’s Blogonaut Blog. Is your legal position that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark’s “slander” about me and others is now a copyright issue? That’s fairly amusing and preposterous. Phawker can speak for itself. In the meantime, I will post your slanderous comments on my Blog and email them to the recipients on my public emails that document the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Yes, once a thief always a thief – that’s probably why Cohen stole from Marty Machat, Bob Johnston and me, defrauded the U.S. government, State of Kentucky, and others. That is not just my personal opinion. It is supported by evidence.

    Kelley Lynch

  127. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelley Lynch says:
    frombillpavelic@aim.com
    toodzerchenma@gmail.com
    dateThu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM
    subjectRe: Moses Znaimer
    mailed-byaim.com
    hide details 1:27 PM (21 hours ago) Reply

    PHIL SHOULD BE VERY APPRECIATIVE OF YOUR TENACIOUS WORK IN HIS MATTER. HIS PROLIFIC PERSONALITY, NO MATTER HOW TASTELESS TO SOME , SHOULD NOT BE USED AS A VEHICLE TO CONVICT AN INNOCENT MAN. I AM CONVINCED IF HE WAS NOT PHIL SPECTOR THIS CASE WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN FILED.
    RESPECTFULLY,
    BILL PAVELIC

  128. Kelly Green Says:

    Sydney and Susanne, you are so right. Lynch is always the victim. However, her family doesn’t see her as a victim; in fact, they’re communicating with the “terrorists”. And never once has Lynch received any kind of support or encouragement from anyone. She’d have to post it on her blog. She can’t help herself. As a matter of fact, we know the only people she’s heard from are Bill Pavlic, Bill Frayeh, Gianelli, Alan Jackson, and Colleen Chenney—and each one has asked her to remove them from her mailing list. And as her past history indicates, she has or will become viscious toward each one. They, too, are now “thugs”. They’ve told her to stop spamming them. Whenever she does get a response she posts it—she can’t help herself. All we “insane thugs” need to see that others have responded to her (thus feeding her immense ego). In regards to an email she spammed to AC360, she received a standard response from the show—and ever since she’s deluded herself into thinking he believes and supports her and her lies. It’s time to be honest: Kelley Lynch and the truth are not accquainted—they don’t even reside on the same planet. Lynch has not a single supporter.

    Now, we know how Lynch will respond to this: we don’t know what we’re talking about, yada yada yada.

    At one time, Lynch insisted Boies Schiller told her she had at least a $20M claim against Cohen. Yeah, right. Sure they said that. Not even B/S could afford to walk away from that settlement. Now if B/S did truthfully tell Lynch of that claim, there must have been a string attached. Of course, B/S would require Lynch to be clean, sane, and sober. Yet, not even the prospect of $20M is enough for Lynch to get (and stay) clean, sane, and sober. Afterall, B/S would require daily drug tests and proof of psych treatment. Is it really any wonder that her family is doing nothing to help her?

  129. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch
    You keep referring to me as a “Cohen cult victim fan”. It coming from you I assume it is meant to be an insult, well I don’t take it that way. I have also met some of the real hard core Cohen fans, and although I agree that some of them are a bit over the top in their love and admiration for Cohen and his work, they are all very kind, loving and intelligent people, but they are much too busy to plan (and make money) for their next trip somewhere in the world to see and hear their Idol, to have time and interest in writing and reading on blogs.
    If you have any idea of where Esbjerg, Denmark is located, you will also know that the distance to Leonard Cohen’s homes in Los Angeles, Montreal, or Hydra is a bit too much for me “dropping by” for a casual chat with Leonard or Lorca. I do not need any of those tactics to show my support for Leonard Cohen.
    You say that you are looking forward to your day in court with Cohen, Gianelli and others, well I am sure you will get your wish and you may very possible end up in jail, (NO it is NOT a threat, just common sense) and maybe that is your wish too, then you do not need to run from one homeless shelter to another.
    Have you ever contemplated getting a job and supporting yourself?. Oh No, sorry, who will hire a pathalogical liar and thief on the verge of complete insanity?. I guess you will just have to keep on slandering people and hope for free room and board for a l o n g time.
    Susanne

  130. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelly Green, how would you know who I am or am not communicating with? You yourself have acknowledged that you are an absolute stranger. Your conduct confirms what I – and my Mother – believe: that this situation has exposed to unstable people. You know nothing about who I have heard from as a “fact” and you should research the definition of fact.

    Colleen Chaney’s email is enclosed (below). It does not say that she wants me to remove her from my emails. She is addressing, in the attachment, very serious issues regarding tax fraud, mail faud, etc. and telling me to whom I address those issues with in Kentucky (ie., the Attorney General and Kentucky Revenue Cabinet).

    I have not become vcious to any of these individuals and that includes Alan Jackson. I addressed, in writing, the fact that he was in contact with Gianelli-Blogonut and issues relating to Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s set up). Not one of them mentined spam or the fact that they believed I was spammng them. If you have evidence proving otherwise – post it here publicly.

    I have never stated that I believe Anderson Cooper or AC360 supported me or my positions. I noted that Anderson Cooper asked Scott Rabb/Esquire if Phil Spector thought he was “framed” and thought that was an intelligent and astute question. Since the forensic science concludes that Clarkson shot herself it is also a question that investigators should be asking themselves. Anderson Cooper and/orAC 360 have never advised me that I have spammed them. Did they communicate this with you?

    I am intimately acquainted with the truth. You, however, are a stranger who is lying abut me and my family (who absolutely support me and you cannot say otherwise) and your motives are suspect, sinister, and abnormal.

    Boies Schiller said $15 million and that was before the destruction of my life and they didn’t have complete asset valuations. Boies Schiller represented Neal Greenberg so they weren’t given the oppotunity to walk away from the type of money I am owed – which is not a settlement. I wouldn’t use them in any event. Good point – I think they wanted me to protect Neal Greenberg who I believed help Cohen create his tax fraud. I don’t have drug or substance abuse issues and people making these allegations will never be able to prove this. How can you, a total stranger, make that allegation? You cannot.

    Kelley Lynch

    fromChaney, Colleen (SOS)
    toKelley Lynch

    dateThu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
    subjectRE: State of Kentucky – Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
    mailed-byky.gov

    hide details Nov 12 (11 days ago)

    Please see the attached response to your November 09, 2009 email. Please let me know if you need further assistance.

    Sincerely,
    Colleen

    Colleen B. Chaney
    Director of Corporations and Legislative Programs
    Office of Secretary of State Trey Grayson
    The Capitol Building
    700 Capital Ave., Suite 152
    Frankfort, KY 40601
    502-564-3490 (office)
    502-564-5687 (fax)

    Letter regarding Traditional Holdings LLC.pdf
    167K View Download

  131. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Mon, 11/23/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: David Boies – Boies Schiller
    To: dboies@bsfllp.com, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, anderson.cooper@cnn.com, colleen.chaney@ky.gov, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
    Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 7:08 PM

    David Boies,

    Why don’t you take a look at the insanity I am dealing with on the internet. You’re a lawyer. Why do you think total strangers want to have me committed and are calling me a drug addict? How do you think this makes my children feel? This is what Cohen’s tax fraud has exposed me to. Do you think Colleen Chaney asked me to remove her? You can read – see her email to me below.

    I intend to subpoena you to to the stand and will ask you who, in the City of LA, you think – as I was told by Posel, will take the fall for what happened to me and why. Also why your firm emailed me to have Brian Bennett wire me when I went to meet with Robert Kory because I was being asked to participate in criminal activity at our luncheon. Your employee was privy to the details and assured me that recording Kory would not be a set up.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 23rd, 2009 at 2:50 pm
    Kelly Green, how would you know who I am or am not communicating with? You yourself have acknowledged that you are an absolute stranger. Your conduct confirms what I – and my Mother – believe: that this situation has exposed to unstable people. You know nothing about who I have heard from as a “fact” and you should research the definition of fact.
    Colleen Chaney’s email is enclosed (below). It does not say that she wants me to remove her from my emails. She is addressing, in the attachment, very serious issues regarding tax fraud, mail faud, etc. and telling me to whom I address those issues with in Kentucky (ie., the Attorney General and Kentucky Revenue Cabinet).
    I have not become vcious to any of these individuals and that includes Alan Jackson. I addressed, in writing, the fact that he was in contact with Gianelli-Blogonut and issues relating to Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal and Phil Spector’s set up). Not one of them mentined spam or the fact that they believed I was spammng them. If you have evidence proving otherwise – post it here publicly.
    I have never stated that I believe Anderson Cooper or AC360 supported me or my positions. I noted that Anderson Cooper asked Scott Rabb/Esquire if Phil Spector thought he was “framed” and thought that was an intelligent and astute question. Since the forensic science concludes that Clarkson shot herself it is also a question that investigators should be asking themselves. Anderson Cooper and/orAC 360 have never advised me that I have spammed them. Did they communicate this with you?
    I am intimately acquainted with the truth. You, however, are a stranger who is lying abut me and my family (who absolutely support me and you cannot say otherwise) and your motives are suspect, sinister, and abnormal.
    Boies Schiller said $15 million and that was before the destruction of my life and they didn’t have complete asset valuations. Boies Schiller represented Neal Greenberg so they weren’t given the oppotunity to walk away from the type of money I am owed – which is not a settlement. I wouldn’t use them in any event. Good point – I think they wanted me to protect Neal Greenberg who I believed help Cohen create his tax fraud. I don’t have drug or substance abuse issues and people making these allegations will never be able to prove this. How can you, a total stranger, make that allegation? You cannot.
    Kelley Lynch
    fromChaney, Colleen (SOS)
    toKelley Lynch
    dateThu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
    subjectRE: State of Kentucky – Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
    mailed-byky.gov
    hide details Nov 12 (11 days ago)
    Please see the attached response to your November 09, 2009 email. Please let me know if you need further assistance.
    Sincerely,
    Colleen
    Colleen B. Chaney
    Director of Corporations and Legislative Programs
    Office of Secretary of State Trey Grayson
    The Capitol Building
    700 Capital Ave., Suite 152
    Frankfort, KY 40601
    502-564-3490 (office)
    502-564-5687 (fax)
    Letter regarding Traditional Holdings LLC.pdf
    167K View Download

  132. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Actually, Walsh, it’s meant as a compliment. I wouldn’t want to insult polite company – if that exists on this Blog – with my actual thought about you and what is going on here. A bit over the top hardly begins to describe hard-core Cohen fans and, having worked as Cohen’s personal manager for approximtely 18 years, I think I’m in a better position than you to address that matter. I am not going to dscuss whether or not Cohen’s fans are kind and loving. That has nothing to do with the slander, lies and threats I am addressing on this Blog

    What’s your point here, Walsh – that you are merely obsessed with me?

    You think I’ll end up in jail, do you? I think Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Rice, Bergman, Gianelli, Belark, and others should end up in prison. You’re just stating that I should be in jail based on intuition, right? Not the evidence that I have sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury, the State of Kentucky, Phil Spector, and others. Just your intuition and the fact that you personally believe Cohen is a good person.

    Good point. I’ve thought the same – that the slander and lies being publicly spewed on these sites affects my job possibilities. That is precisely what damages will address. Fortunately, intuition is not a viable legal defense and I have repeatedly corrected the lies, slander, etc. so no one is going to be able to say they relied on any lie in good faith. I have also pointed people, like the lawyer Stephen Gianelli and his reporter Joff Belark, to evidence I publicly filed against Cohen in Boulder with my Motion to Quash. Therefore, they are not going to have deniability as to the facts either.

    Kelley Lynch

    Have you ever contemplated getting a job and supporting yourself?. Oh No, sorry, who will hire a pathalogical liar and thief on the verge of complete insanity?. I guess you will just have to keep on slandering people and hope for free room and board for a l o n g time.
    Susanne

  133. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelley Lynch Says:

    November 23rd, 2009 at 3:12 pm
    Actually, Walsh, it’s meant as a compliment. I wouldn’t want to insult polite company – if that exists on this Blog – with my actual thought about you and what is going on here. A bit over the top hardly begins to describe hard-core Cohen fans and, having worked as Cohen’s personal manager for approximtely 18 years, I think I’m in a better position than you to address that matter. I am not going to dscuss whether or not Cohen’s fans are kind and loving. That has nothing to do with the slander, lies and threats I am addressing on this Blog

    What’s your point here, Walsh – that you are merely obsessed with me?

    You think I’ll end up in jail, do you? I think Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Rice, Bergman, Gianelli, Belark, and others should end up in prison. You’re just stating that I should be in jail based on intuition, right? Not the evidence that I have sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury, the State of Kentucky, Phil Spector, and others. Just your intuition and the fact that you personally believe Cohen is a good person.

    Good point. I’ve thought the same – that the slander and lies being publicly spewed on these sites affects my job possibilities. That is precisely what damages will address. Fortunately, intuition is not a viable legal defense and I have repeatedly corrected the lies, slander, etc. so no one is going to be able to say they relied on any lie in good faith. I have also pointed people, like the lawyer Stephen Gianelli and his reporter Joff Belark, to evidence I publicly filed against Cohen in Boulder with my Motion to Quash. Therefore, they are not going to have deniability as to the facts either. Beyond that, Cohen owes me millions and my children and parents would not be suffering economically if he had not stolen from me. Then there’s Ray’s alleged father: who should have repaid me rather than inserting himself into this matter as well. I discussed the custody matter with the Treasuy Agents and no one is going to be able to explain away Robert Kory’s Declaration in that so called custody matter. He did not know my son and it’s clear evidence of witness tampering with a minor.

    Kelley Lynch

  134. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Kelley. No I am not obsessed with you, but I am intrigued with what make a person like you tick.
    Yes, I agree that all this internet hoolabahloo probably have hurt your chances of getting employment, but I do not believe it is because of Cohen’s or Lindsey’s or others suits against you, I believe it is your own conducts and presentation of yourself on the internet that has destroyed your credibility and put a huge negative on your qualifications as a trusted employer, so maybe slandering and suing people will be the only career you will have from now on, I guess that is your own choise
    Susanne

  135. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, what is driving me right now is the fact that Cohen targeted my elderly parents and children. Any decent parent can and does understand this. The activity is continuing on the internet and the comments on this Blog are evidence of that. Gianelli-Blogonaut has threatened to sue Rutger who has done nothing but perceived Gianelli-Blogonaut’s remarks as a threat.

    I disagree. Cohen basically released a press release and, if you read his intervew with Brian Johnson, clearly stated that he was not accusing me of theft. He also mentioned the tax hit.

    Actually, I worked for Deneuve Construction who saw what was going on with the internet slander, asked me why I ever associated with people like Lindsey and Cohen, and determined I was the victim of filthy lawyering so clearly they didn’t find me untrustworthy but saw through the lies. The Southards, who I worked for, and who have known me since I was a teenager also saw through the situation and reviewed some of the evidence, had me speak to their attorneys, and understood – after listening to Ray’s abusive father – that he is not a man but a twisted person who plays mind-games with his son.

    As I’ve stated, and you have not reviewed the evidence or witnessed what I and others have – I am telling the truth. You are merely gossiping, lying, and slandering me. What you believe is irrelevant to me. You will not be on a jury.

    I realize that you’re intrigued. Obsessed also. Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive is more sinister – particularly as he was communicating with Cohen’s advisers, prosecutor Alan Jackson, and is a “lawyer” who as lied to the FBI and understands – all to well – concepts like slander. But, it’s a game – for him. For me – it’s deadly serious. The IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury can entertain themselves with men like Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, et al. who definitely thinks this is a “federal prank.”

    Kelley Lynch

  136. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, just out of curiosity, you don’t hit the crack pipe, do you? Your illogical and irrational fascination with the destruction of my life and your creepy intuitions indicate some type of disorder. Also, the fact that you intuitively speak for United State federal agencies and Phil Spector’s legal team, without shame, is definitely worth noting.

    Kelley Lynch

  137. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, since you’re so intrgued with Cohen’s Tax Fraud matter what do you have to say about this statement in Bian Johnson’s article. I had no idea this was the reason Cohen hired Greenberg – to “protect” him from an “upfront tax hit.” There are seious tax issues associated with this statement. What’s your intuition tell you – from an IRS standpoint? Can you legally avoid paying taxes by using scam entiities and deceving the IRS?

    From the first sale, about $5 million was transferred to trusts that Greenberg had been enlisted to manage and that would protect Cohen from an upfront tax hit …

    Greenberg is correct about this although I don’t know what “dangers” he is referring to. I know I gave the IRS evidence that Greenberg and Westin (in writing) felt that Cohen’s level of borrowing – from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” to the structure itself. Any comments on that? Let’s address the facts and evdence rather than the ruse slander, etc.

    Would you like to expound on Cohen’s own statement – made to Brian Johnson and published – that he was not accusing me of theft? This is a very straightforward and crystal clear statement so I’m not certain how it has become twisted. As you know, I have been accused of theft on this Blog and yet Cohen himself publicly declared that he was not/is not accusing me of theft.

    “I’m not accusing her of theft,” he says of Lynch.

    I look forward to hearing your “insights” into why Cohen stated publicly that he is not accusing me of theft – particularly as you mentioned “jail.”

    Kelley Lynch

  138. Kelley Lynch Says:

    The Greenberg remark is as follows. Let me know what “dangers” you think he’s talking about. Not only did Cohen sign off on Traditional Holdings, he named the entity, the documnts are notarized, and I asked for and received an Indemnity Agreement.

    Greenberg alleges that Cohen, well aware of the structure and its dangers, signed off on it.

  139. Kelly PLZ Face Reality Says:

    Dear Psycho:

    What you can’t seem to get in your head is that the binding effect of the CA $7.9 million theft judgment against you is that all claims that Cohen had, and that you had but failed to assert as a cross-complaint, that arise out of your former business relationship have been conclusively adjudicated.

    That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.

    You denying that Cohen was the victim of your wrongdoing is like OJ denying, in the face of the $40 million judgment to the contrary, that he killed his ex-wife.

    It’s over, Psycho. You lost. Get over it.

    Cohen landed on his feet and his career is bigger and better than ever.

    You hit the skids, are homeless and are mentally disturbed, and psycho with nothing, because unlike Cohen and despite your extraordinary human potential even after 5 years you have been unable to pivot away from your adversity and move on to positive endeavors.

    You are pathetic and mean spirited and we ALL wish you would just crawl into a hole and disappear, because you have nothing positive or constructive to offer–only negative, harmful energy.

    I do feel sorry for your sons, sister, mother and other relatives whom you have publicly shamed by revealing your familial connection to them but not for you.

    Everybody knows everyone on you email spam list laughs or cringes or both when their inbox starts filling up with your latest rants about Suzanne Walsh or Kelley Green or this blogger or that person. But they do not care about you and never will. You have become a caricature of your self.

    Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.

    Therefore, the biggest joke of all is that joke that you have played on yourself through your constant self-negitive publicity machine.

    Likewise, who would want to hire a business manager or even an assistant with a history of turning just about everyone you get mad at (including a former employer) into the IRS and every law enforcment agency that will listen–not to mention an adjudicated thief and self deluded psycho.

  140. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I see we’re dissembling.

    There is no binding judgment. You cannot go into court, lie, commit perjury, and prevail. These are crimes and Cohen should obviously be prosecuted. You also cannot illegally make someone a partner on a corporation (LC Investments, LLC) and steal from people. I did not fail to assert a cross complaint. I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and believe his bogus lawsuit wih fraudulent financials attached is evidence of his attempts to obstruct justice and to cover up criminal conduct and criminal tax fraud. The lawsuit has nothing to do with the entities raised and I remain unconvinced that a California Court had jurisdiction I am also not convinced that Cohen is actually a resident – based on the fact that he abandoned a green card and obtained a new one after Marty Machat’s death although he has held himself out to be one. The attorneys I’ve spoken with disagree with your legal analysis and never once mentioned your lame attempt to turn Cohen’s garbage into a catch-all lawsuit.

    Cohen told a reporter he was not accusing me of theft. Trust me – that matters. Are you speaking for the IRS again? How do you know that nothing I told the IRS will have any effect? What if the IRS prosecutes Cohen for criminal tax fraud and takes the position that I was used as an unwitting pawn and all Cohen’s activity – including his fraud in Boulder – are evidence of the lengths he’s gone to obstruct justice, witness tamper, and silence me? That’s a distinct possibility. Whether or not I asked that the fraudulent restraining order be made permanent does not address Cohen’s perjury in his Declaration.

    I don’t think the OJ matter has any similarities to Cohen’s tax fraud – but Bill Pavelic has stated publicly that LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set up him, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden – in retaliation for the OJ trial so that’s quite heavy as it relates to Phil Spector.

    I will continue to address all slander and lies.

    Why? They know Cohen, know what he’s capable of, and believe I have been targeted by nuts an liars on the internet.

    I think Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissoner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury, the FBI, and others (like Ron Burkle) should tesify to whether or not they think they’re on a “spam list and cring when their email boxes fill up.

    Walsh and Green are certainly obsessive about someone they don’t know or care about. They don’t know me.

    Well, I’m not about to start arguing whether the IRS and/or DOJ can prosecute Cohen and I know for a fact that you do not speak for them. If you are, however, an IRS or DOJ agent, please post your official position on this Blog using your oficial email address as evidence of your employment with these agencies. The IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI can decide if federal crimes have been committed. I happen to personally believe they have been committed and no one can covince me otherwise. Why would the IRS be laughed out of court? Whenever I talk to anyone they ask why Cohen isn’t in prison and believe Phil Spector was framed. If I am a potential prominent government witness then that would mean that there’s a “pending” matter, wouldn’t it?

    I wasn’t Cohen’s business manager and Brian Johnsn was clear that I was Cohen’s personal manager. Cohen himself was clear about this and should review the Declaration he filed in District Court in the failed CAK bond deal that concerned Robert Kory.

    I realize that turning a former partner into the IRS created problems for me and ths could and has affected my ability to work. Thank you for pointing this out. Cohen was not my employer and that is why I received 1099s every year. Why he refused to give me one for 2004 is unbeknownst to me but the IRS should investigate that and I view my commissions for that year as a gift due to his refusal to 1099 me as he had in the past.

    Cohen himsef has said he was not accusing me of theft so let’s let his own words speak for themselves. To do otherwise is preposterous and sheer lunacy.

    I see that you understand, all to well, that I am a highly credible witness – as many people have pointed out. In fact, what they are now pointing out is the fact tha Cohen so viciously targeted me, destroyed my life, and all he is left with is his evil mess. They feel this way about Phil Spector’s prosecutors also.

    I will pass your posting onto the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI. I think detemining who has motive to slander and undermine my credibility with such a vengeance is a key issue.

    Kelley Lynch

  141. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Leonard Cohen to Brian Johnson re. Kelley Lynch

    “I’m not accusing her of theft,” he says of Lynch.

  142. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids. I know how upsetting that is to Cohen, Lindsey, the District Attorney, Alan Jackson, et al.

  143. Kelley--Give us a break Says:

    “Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids.” Huh?

    Obviously, we have a different yard stick for rock bottom. (For me morphing into a homeless ranting nutcase would be the skids, especially if I formerly lived in a $3 million home with a pool in a nice part of Los Angeles, had two wonderful kids, was a business manager for a well known music figure, negotiated multi-million dollar deals, and made seven figures in a single year.

    Perhaps I can put it in terms that you might understand: Compared to Leonard Cohen you are a dung beetle.

    You have constructed quite a fantasy world for yourself Kelley.

  144. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject:
    To: “*irs. commissioner” , “ASKDOJ” , Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “doronweinberg” , “Dennis”

    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, “U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission” , “USCISWebmaster” , billpavelic@aol.com

    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 2:45 AM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Please review the posting below carefuly. Apparently “Kelly PLZ Face Reality” understands that I am a potental “prominent government witness.” I think it’s obvious that this is witness tampering and it’s a game. The game seems to be to have the IRS laughed out of Court. I think this is an unbelievably blatant posting and the person who posted it is ubelievably crass, arrogant, and aggressive. I have been exposed to highly suspect individuals since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS which, no doubt, jeopardizes my job possiblities because they are dead set on slandering me and undermining my credibiity and because potential employers probably would not like to hear that someone reported criminal tax fraud – or anything – to the IRS. This underscores my position that reporting tax fraud is dangerous – from many perspectives. They, of course, continue to speak for each of the federal agencies copied in here and for you, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan.

    The OJ comment is interesting – particularly in light of Bll Pavelic’s allegations that he, Dr Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaiation for the OJ trial. Perhaps it was just Freudian.

    In any event, I a concerned about my children being exposed to these maniacs – in particular, Rutger, who has been targeted already.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    cc: Phil Spector

    Kelly PLZ Face Reality Says:
    November 23rd, 2009 at 8:42 pm
    Dear Psycho:
    What you can’t seem to get in your head is that the binding effect of the CA $7.9 million theft judgment against you is that all claims that Cohen had, and that you had but failed to assert as a cross-complaint, that arise out of your former business relationship have been conclusively adjudicated.
    That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.
    You denying that Cohen was the victim of your wrongdoing is like OJ denying, in the face of the $40 million judgment to the contrary, that he killed his ex-wife.
    It’s over, Psycho. You lost. Get over it.
    Cohen landed on his feet and his career is bigger and better than ever.
    You hit the skids, are homeless and are mentally disturbed, and psycho with nothing, because unlike Cohen and despite your extraordinary human potential even after 5 years you have been unable to pivot away from your adversity and move on to positive endeavors.
    You are pathetic and mean spirited and we ALL wish you would just crawl into a hole and disappear, because you have nothing positive or constructive to offer–only negative, harmful energy.
    I do feel sorry for your sons, sister, mother and other relatives whom you have publicly shamed by revealing your familial connection to them but not for you.
    Everybody knows everyone on you email spam list laughs or cringes or both when their inbox starts filling up with your latest rants about Suzanne Walsh or Kelley Green or this blogger or that person. But they do not care about you and never will. You have become a caricature of your self.
    Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.
    Therefore, the biggest joke of all is that joke that you have played on yourself through your constant self-negitive publicity machine.
    Likewise, who would want to hire a business manager or even an assistant with a history of turning just about everyone you get mad at (including a former employer) into the IRS and every law enforcment agency that will listen–not to mention an adjudicated thief and self deluded psycho.

  145. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Robert Kory “himself,” the self-proclaimed “tax jock,” even wrote me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to matters going back many years. Perhaps Kelly PLZ Face Reality Says should speak to Kory personally. He can explain to “it” why he told me that there was fraud on every entity, the holding periods were illegal, and advised me that I had a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers. Of course, Mike Taitelman will have to testify to the fact that Kory personally told him that if I said/did what he/Cohen wanted they would say I was a pawn. Otherwise, they would say I orchestrated this insane mess. We’ll also have to find out what Cohen’s legal team and other advisers were doing. They didn’t appear to me to be rogues. I actually am about to review a tremendous amount of evidence that was in storage. I want to send the IRS Commisioner’s Staff the balance of paperwork – some of which they don’t have yet. It ould break my heart to see them laughed out of Court – particularly after Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Superfon, and others, have gone to such great lengths to silence me and destroy my life. I also want to get my hair done nicely – just in case the IRS calls its potential “prominent government witness.” Most people like the way I dress but I’ll probably need a few new outfits.

  146. Kelly Green Says:

    Well, well, well…call me suprised. You’ve failed to post all the emails from those I listed. Without a doubt, Kelley, you’ve got the best “selective” memory around—and it won’t hold you in good stead with the courts.

    Kelley, you’re the LAST person on earth who should be questioning whether others engage in intoxicating or illegal substances; afterall, you’re the one with a CRIMINAL HISTORY of substance abuse and associated violent crimes.

  147. Kelly Green Says:

    Talk about selective reasoning:
    “The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.” (posted by Kelly PLZ)

    Do you honestly believe Kelly PLZ said or implied that you’d be a “prominent government witness”? You think that’s a compliment? A recognition for all you’ve suffered? If you truly believe you’ll be a prominent witness in any criminal case brought by the gov’t, then you’re really delusional. No one has anything to fear if you’re going to be the “prominent witness” against them.

  148. Kelly Green Says:

    Just out of curiosity, Kelley, why didn’t your advisors report “Cohen’s taxfraudIwastoldwascriminal”?

    Additionally, no one responding to your delusional and slanerdous postings is witness tampering or practicing witness intimidation. See, for us to be engaged in tampering and intimidation, we’d have to have a stake in the outcome. We don’t. No one in cyberspace is trying to silence you; however, you continue to bully us in hopes we’ll go away—how’s that working for you?

  149. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelly Green, don’t hold your breath. I won’t be posting anything you’ve asked for and last I checked you were’t my King and I was not your subject – although I realize I am the subject of your obsesion and fixation.

    I see that you really don’t know me. I have no history, whatsoever, of illegal substance abuse and I do not have a criiminal history. Just ran into some real rotten, corrupt cops and government officials who have no qualms – whatsoever -lying their asses off on the witness stand. I noticed that jurors happen to see rght through this … particularly when judges and other conflicted municipal employees (say in Boulder, Colorado) suppress facts and information from jurors who requested them.

    I think I’ll be just fne in court. Fortunately, since you’re a stranger who does not know me you won’t be there. I also tend to doubt that the IRS, if there is a “pending matter” where I mght be a “prominent government witness” (who you and others are dead set on slandering), will be laughed out of Court. That being said, the same is not true for the people that I feel have “motive” to undermine my credibility. As I have stated ad nauseum , you cannot undermine people with lis.

    Perhaps you are thinking of Leonard Cohen when talking about someone with a history of illegal substance abuse – which he has discussed in the press. And then there’s his abuse of prescription meth – and his carefully crafted and nauseating story to the pharmacologist that he wasn’t going to “knock over a gas station” to get meth. I don’t know if he has a violent history but Ann Diamond did send me some fascinating emails and did think Cohen had a history of aggression and was literally capable of “murder.” Please contact Ann Diamond directly for further details into the “man” Freda Guttman told her molested his daughter – according to his daughter.

    Please keep in mind that you cannot simply lie about people and slander me publcly by stating that I have “a criminal history of substance abuse associated with violent crimes” when I do not. But, I realize this is a game and I am well aware that people posting here are convinced that the IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and FBI ae engaged in a federal prank I know someone who is not engaged in a federal or state prank. That is Phil Spector who witnessed a woman shoot herself at his house and is now sitting in prison because, according to Phillip, Steve Cooley has to flee the jurisdiction for Sacramento. Somehow I am not convinced that he will meet his goals but I realize that people – including the feds – should be very careful with Steve Cooley and his gang of merry thugs. In fact, Im praying for the DEA – I wouldn’t want to read that (like Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden) LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set them up also. With this “Hollywood” crowd anything could happen.

    For the record, I now think you have crossed the proverbial line and should begin gathering evidence and witnesses to support your position that I have a substance abuse and/or criminal history. That needs to be proven. And, that will happen when hell freezes over. I will, however, bring this to the attention of the Department of Justice because Boulder PD is all over this story and their activities need to be investigated. People frequenty call for investigations but most people -unlike Gianelli – do not lie to the FBI or attempt to coerce me into what would probably have been an illegal deal with Cohen. That’s his idea of “helping” me. I know – I see right through him.

    Kelley Lynch
    A Stranger to Kelly Green

  150. Sydney Says:

    To “Kelley PLZ Face Reality” – I bow to your superior knowledge and understanding of this psycho. I try to be optimistic about people, but this Kelley Lynch person has presented herself as someone who is truly evil. She is so consumed by hate that she is no longer a person who becomes evil but she is now only evil through and through. The person she once may have been no longer exists.
    And Kelley, you can say anything you want about anyone; just understand that in doing so, you leave yourself wide open to repercussions. And by the way, what happened to the letter from Colleen Chaney from Kentucky? All you did was post her address. Are we supposed to believe that because you posted her address that she actually wrote to you and supported (read abetted) your cyber terrorism? You named your blog appropriately because you truly a cyber terrorist. I eagerly await your court hearings when you attempt to defend yourself against a lawsuit; I also eagerly await that one fine day when you get all your self-perceived enemies in criminal court to answer your so-called charges against them. It will be quite entertaining to watch you self-destruct either by actually opening your mouth and speaking, or when you oh-so-predictably don’t show up. Your entertainment value is diminishing. Get a job, get a new hobby and then get a life. The one you think you’re living died years ago.
    Oh, and I’m not threatening you – I’m just telling you the truth.

  151. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelly Green, how do you know te IRS would be laughed out of court in “any case premised in any way” on my “testimony” where I was figured as a “prominent government witness.” Perhaps the IRS would like to weigh in on your comments. And, I might point out that while you are slandering me and attempting to undermine me as a potential witness (with the full knowledge and awareness that I may be a “prominent government witness”) you have stated that you do not know me and I am a stranger to you. Therefore, your motive is more than suspect.

    Yes, I honestly believe that Kelly PLZ not only implied but understands that I may e a “prominent government witness” in a pending matter. No, I don’t think that’s a compliment. I think it’s a statement of fact. Actually, let’s stick to what was said – here it is verbatim:

    ‘Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness. ”

    This is written in plain English and what it says is that Cohen cannot be prosecuted using my testimony because people are dead set on undermining my credibility as “prominent government witness.” I have not filed one false complaint with anyone and repeat – evey word I have uttered/written is the truth and backed up by evidence I’ve sent to the IRS and others. Furthermore, it clearly states that the IRS will be laughed out of court on any case premised in any way on my testimony which goes to “motive.” If no one has anything to fear if I was going to be a “prominent witness against them” why would they go to such lengths to lie about me, slander me, and witness tamper? Someone (or many someones) apparently view me as a credible witness and a viable threat in any pending criminal prosecution. That’s clear as a bell to me.

    Dale Burgess, my former accountant, asked me to convey to the IRS and Treasury – on his behalf (immediately following my meeting with the Treasury Agents) that he would testify to the fact that Cohen offered me 50% community property and my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud. Dale Burgess also felt that Criminal Intelligence of the IRS should be involved here or was involved here. Furthermore, he advised me that once I took the allegations to a field office (like Agent Tejeda’s) it would take time. Since he was an IRS Agent Iwill assume he knows what he is doing.

    You and others seem to be responding plenty. In fact, you don’t seem to be able to control yourselves and I now believe you and others on this Blog are acting recklessly and making huge mistakes and admissions. You have witnessed nothing. I do not know you and you have acknowledged that so don’t insult my intelligence with your nonsensical statements and rants.

    That’s a fascinating sentiment: “For us t be engaged in tampering and intimidation, we’d have to have a stake in the outcome.” I am unconvinced of that legal position and no one on earth would go to the trouble of lying about someone they admit is a stranger or slandering them for no reason whatsoever.
    It is also entirely possible that you and others posting on this Blog have “a stake in the outcome.” That is far more plausible.

    Actually, let’s not get insane. You and others have followed me around the internet and Michelle Blaine herself thanked Blogonaut for also targeting me, my Blogs, and emails.

    It’s not working for me at all but perhaps the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan are buying it.

    Kelley Lynch

  152. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, do you mean the superior knowledge that caused Kelly PLZ Face Reality to confirm that I am potentially a “prominent government witness” and the goal here is to undermine the IRS? I’m not convinced that’s actually superior knowledge and understanding but it may be criminal. The IRS would know for certain.

    I understand your threats that if I speak, Sydney, you and others will continue to lie, slander me, and attempt to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent government witness.” So, I’m clear about the repercussions.

    I posted Colleen Chaney’s email. I followed her instructions and contacted the Attorney General of Kentucky and the Revenue Cabinet regarding the various issues. Believe whatever you want about Colleen Chaney’s email to me who did write to me and sent an attachment.

    Leonard Cohen and his lawyers – and Gianelli, no doubt – assume I won’t show up. They are dead wrong. From here on out, I will show up anywhere they file anything. I just didn’t participate in Cohen’s garbage lawsuit that I view as an attempt to obstruct justice or Neal Greenberg’s companion suit that I believe proves collusion. In other words, people shouldn’t be foolish enough to assume that I won’t appear in Court. I will.

    Thank goodness my former life that included Cohen and Lindsey died. I was tired being surrounded by lying con artists. I have a life and a very very interesting witness sitting right here with me who knows me – and all the parties involved here (for the most part) exceedingly well. He’s not fooled by this either and doesn’t think I’m engaged in a federal prank. He, Yongzin Rinpoche, and others think people are attempting to scare and intimidate me. That is not going to happen and they are not going to undermine me with lies. Perhaps Cohen (and others) should get a real attorney now.

    Kelley Lynch

  153. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Here you go Sydney. Why don’t you read Colleen Chaney’s email to me again. Sorry I can’t post the attachment which gave me instructons on who to contact with respect to my various questions. That would be the Attorney General of Kentucky and the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet. Colleen Chaney’s contact information is enclosed. Feel free to write her since you’ve inserted yourself into this matter.

    Kelley Lynch

    fromChaney, Colleen (SOS)
    toKelley Lynch

    dateThu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
    subjectRE: State of Kentucky – Traditional Holdings, LLC, LC Investments, LLC
    mailed-byky.gov

    hide details Nov 12 (11 days ago)

    Please see the attached response to your November 09, 2009 email. Please let me know if you need further assistance.

    Sincerely,
    Colleen

    Colleen B. Chaney
    Director of Corporations and Legislative Programs
    Office of Secretary of State Trey Grayson
    The Capitol Building
    700 Capital Ave., Suite 152
    Frankfort, KY 40601
    502-564-3490 (office)
    502-564-5687 (fax)

    Letter regarding Traditional Holdings LLC.pdf
    167K View Download

  154. Sydney Says:

    blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Boooooring. Same words every post, every day, every blog site. Not a trace of truth or sanity among them. Time to retire Kelley. You’ve lost your edge. Your attempt to twist the words of one poster into something s/he did not say is just more of the same old BS you’ve been posting for years. If you don’t want people responding to your postings, then stay off the internet. Take care of your private business the old fashioned way – privately. You have shown yourself to be the most useless piece of flesh imaginable and your overabundance of evil puts you on a fast track to hell. Perhaps you can join up with OJ and rehash how victimized you are. I’m sure he’ll be a sympathetic listener.

  155. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, all she’s saying is that she attached a response to your November 9, 2009. What the hell is that supposed to prove? You are such a liar and a POS. Hope God forgives you Kelley Lynch because I doubt anyone in this life will. You are a pathetic liar, fraud, cheat, thief, manipulator and viciously evil person. What an absolute loser you are.

  156. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, I would hate to twist the words of one poster so let me just post them again here:

    ‘Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness. ”

    I am aware that you are attempting to silence me hence statements like “If you don’t want people responding to your postings, then stay off the internet.” The response is – no, I will not stay off the internet. Whenever and wherever I find malicious lies and calculated slander I will respond, correct the lies and slander, and state the truth. This is a very straightforward concept. There is nothing private about criminal tax fraud or a murder trial set up.

    The OJ remarks are gratuitous. Every time OJ is raised I think of Bill Pavelic’s allegations that LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit set up him, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden in retaliation for the OJ trial. Leonard Cohen was not murdered and is not dead in any event so your remarks about OJ are over the top and irrational.

    I know what Colleen Chaney’s saying. She responded to my letter. I can’t follow your line of reasoning. How does Colleen Chaney’s letter to me end up with your telling me that you hope God forgives me. I am not a pathetic liar, fraud, cheat, thief, manipulator and viciously evil person but I realize I am a viable threat and credible witness.

    Let’s end with a quote of Leonard Cohen’s. Why not let the master’s words speak for themselves. They speak volumes – particularly when taken in the context of the massive tax hit he was attempting to avoid. He probably could have avoided the penalties and interest if his disdain for ordinary income taxes wasn’t unprecedented from what I witnessed.

    Kelley Lynch

    “I’m not accusing her of theft,” he says of Lynch.

  157. Kelly Green Says:

    Kelley, those with mug shots have a criminal history!

  158. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. The OJ comments make me think of Donna Cllarkson. I know she wants what OJ was forced to pay. Unfortunately, the forensic science proved – in this matter – that Lana Clarkson shot herself. Sydney, you seem so vicious and angry. Are you seeing a therapist? Calling a perfect stranger a piece of shit and having such an obvious interest in a perfect stranger. Leonard Cohen himself has stated publicly that he was not accusing me of theft. Are you attempting to threaten me with something Leonard Cohen himself has made quite clear is not an issue. His theft of my intellectual property is, however, a very serious issue. I’ve emailed Phawker that they should not destroy IP address information – particularly now that it’s clear that you are all “tampering” with a potential “prominent government witness” and attempting to undermine a possibly pending IRS prosecution which I would assume is criminal.

    Kelley Lynch

  159. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Saw that one coming Ms. Green and, therefore, reminded the Department of Justice that Boulder PD needs to be investigated. The FBI in Denver understood that something was criminal connected with Officer Storbeck coming into Deneuve Construction after my conversation with Officer Garrin of LAPD – after all, why would they send me to the Boulder District Attorney and the Attorney General of Colorado? Who released the “mug shot” also needs to be investigated particularly as it was part of Joff Belark’s slanderous lie disguised as an article after he targeted me. I copied the IRS Commissioner’s Staff on his initial contacts with me – as well as others. Anything else you want to rehash?

    Kelley Lynch

  160. Kelly Green Says:

    You’re not going to ever prosecute anyone in a criminal court. As big as your ego is and as deluded as you are, nothing will change that. You can huff, and puff, and try to blow down a courthouse, but no prosecuter will ever take you seriously. The best you can ever hope for is a civil trial—and during a civil trial the jury will laugh at you. Don’t you get it—no judge is ever going to allow you the opportunity to persue any type of trial. WTH, show up at a courthouse, demand to see a judge or prosecuter–in minutes you’ll be ordered held for a 5150 hearing.

  161. Kelly Green Says:

    Are you asking us to believe the cops have your low-jacked? That cops have nothing better to do so they might as well find where Kelley is so they can bust/harrass somebody?

  162. Kelly Green Says:

    First, mug shots are part of a criminals record and those are considered open records—meaning if someone asks for them, the cops MUST provide them.

    Second, I have never said and I will never say that the gov’t considers you a prominent witness—that’s your fantasy: not actuality.

    Finally, you really want us to believe the Browne family and the Clarkson family want money. NO, they want their daughters back. Thanks to your good friend Phil Spector (who even you acknowledge you met only a few times) that will never happen. Just out of curiosity, if Drs. Lee and Baden were so crucial to Spector’s case, why didn’t they testify during the 2nd trial?

  163. Kelley Lynch Says:

    There are no cops here with us – are there Ms. Green? The Boulder issue is behind us and it was a misdemeanor that needs to be investigated. That’s when I’ll call my witness – the owner of Juanita’s. After all, his manager stated – for the record – in a court of law that Boulder PD did not want me in Juanita’s. Apparently Boulder PD didn’t have all that much to do since they inserted themselves into Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud matter and the Phil Spector murder trial. I also did notice, and it is on my Blog presently, that Gianelli-Blogonaut “urged” LAPD and Boulder PD to target me and Joff Belark attempted to do something with Boulder PD when he sent Rutger’s email to them.

    That’s right Green, I’m not a U.S. Prosecutor and I’m not going to prosecute anyone in a criminal court. But it is entirely possible, and you are well aware of this as are the other posters here (in particular the one that stated I am conceivably a “prominent government witness”), that the IRS is going to prosecute Leonard Cohen for his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. The only people that think this is a federal prank are the same people who are shamelessly attempting to undermine my credibility and who are lying about me and slandering me. The jury in Boulder wasn’t laughing and I believe they understood what had happened to a great extent which is precisely why they asked when the “trespassing” charges were brought – eight months after I witnessed a man with his penis out in front of a child and attempted to find a police officer. And, after the initial hearing in the matter that the City Attorney’s office miscommunicated with me about and told me someone would return my call to reschedule the hearing. That’s one hell of a miscommunication, isn’t it?

    Do you speak for everyone – including all judges? I doubt it.

    Gratuitous banter. I see everyone freaked out after the potential “prominent government witness” tampering was confirmed and cannot be retracted and has absolutely been emailed to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. They all understood that I knew Boulder PD was going to be raised as an issue tonight well in advance of that happening. That’s because I see right through you. I know this pisses you off but it’s the truth. And now you sound like morons attempting to forget what is posted above but I captured that and the entire content of this Blog and will continue to do so. After all, I’m documenting the destruction of my life, slander, etc., that arose solely due to the fact that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud and was dragged into the Phil Spector insanity.

    Kelley Lynch

  164. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yes, Ms. Lynch I am aware that Leonard Cohen stated that “he did not accuse you of theft” he also stated that because of concern and loyalty towards you and your family, he initially did not want to sue you, that he could live without the money, he justed wanted to see the books and know where the money had gone. I believe he is still waiting for that. He also said he was hurt and disappointed in you, but bore no ill feelings towards you. He did make a comment once, to a reporter, that he and you had a “brief sexual relationship 20 years ago” (the reporter used the word “lovers” Cohen did not), but with that one exception he has never publically spoken of your sex-life, as he has never spoken of your alcohol/drug use or your mental or emotional state, he has never attackt your character or accused you of ,or insinuated, that you were a bad or abuse parent, he has never spoken of you, your children or your parents in a derogatory or defamatory way.
    All this speaks in Leonard Cohen’s favor, not in yours Ms. Lynch.
    Again-again and again, your life was NOT destroyed, your job options were not reduced and you did not get harassed and slandered “solely because of the facts that you reported Cohen’s tax fraud” or got involved with the Phil Spector case. You have destroyed your own, your children’s and possible your parents lives, first by your dishonesty (call it theft or any other word) later and perhaps more important with your very public exposure of your private life, your hate and your relentless slander of various people.
    Susanne

  165. Webber Says:

    Colleen Chaney did not “respond” to Kelley Lynch’s email–except to blow her off.

    See this KL email to Chaney agreeing to drop Chaney from KL’s spam email list:

    “On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
    Chaney, Colleen (SOS) to me Hello Colleen, Thank you for the attached which I am sharing with Mr. Weinberg, Mr. Riordan, the IRS, DOJ, Agent Sopko and others. I now understand why Leonard Cohen, Richard Westin, Neal Greenberg, and others, felt comfortable committing what I was told is criminal tax fraud and setting up sham entities, etc. On the fact of it, from my perspective, it looks as though many people should be in prison. I’ll remove you from my emails. Someone in Kentucky is going to come up with answers. I don’t intend to spend the rest of my life contacting federael and state agencies. I’m beginning to wonder why we actually have them. Thank you,Kelley Lynch”

    Kelley, your nose is growing, again.

  166. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “Kelly Green, how do you know te IRS would be laughed out of court in “any case premised in any way” on my “testimony” where I was figured as a “prominent government witness.”

    Ms. Lynch:

    It is common sense, which is something you quite obviously lack.

    >How many people do you know (other than you) that have reported hundreds of others to the IRS, Justice Department, and others, based on their blog comments?

    >How many people do you know (other than you) that CC the IRS and a hundred others when they email their sister or son?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that send as many as 14 emails A DAY to the IRS, and have sent the IRS several THOUSAND emails in the last seversal years?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that write several emails a day for over a year to the same two high profile attorneys who they have never met or talked to, and who do not reply?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that have a $9 million dollar judgment and two harassment restraining orders against them or have been taken against their will to a psychiatric facility?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that share ALL of the above attributes?

    Does any of this behavior seem remotely normal to you?

    No wonder you fancy yourself to be a credible witness. In your world up is down and down is up.

  167. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli/Blogonaut,

    Rather than harass me why don’t you file a lawsuit and handle this in the proper venue. Following me around the internet, slandering me, offering to communicate with Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers on my behalf, lying to Agent Wynar/FBI, and making a joke out of the IRS matter (that I believe is probably real) is what I believe needs to be investigated. No stranger would have Joff Belark target me, post lies and slander about me on the internet, target my son and attempt to intimidate him, and go to these lengths for no reason whatsoever. Furthermore, your contacts with Alan Jackson need to be explored and the fact that you called Investigator William Frayeh – on the Phil Spector matter – is clearly a serious issue. I can assure you that Phil Spector does not view that as frivolous or superfluous activity. He is, after all, in prison and there is evidence that Lana Clarkson shot herself.

    Trust me – I don’t lack common sense but the fact that someone posted on this Blog last night that I may be a prominent government witness and the IRS will be laughed out of court is a very very egregious matter. In other words, it basically proves witness tampering.

    I have no idea who has reported anyone to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury. Write them directly and ask. I have not reported hundreds of people to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury. Be clear about that. I reported Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, law enforcement and government misconduct, and have asked that certain parties – such as yourself – be investigated because I believe your goal is to undermine my credibility as a potential witness. I have stated this ad nauseum.

    Since you are a complete stranger to me I don’t you are in a position to command me to answer anything. Write the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and/or Treasury and ask them how many people copy them in on emails documenting the destruction of their lives – for reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into the Phil Spector murder trial that appears to be a set up. You like to quote Bill Pavelic. Therefore, you must believe he is credible. Bill Pavelic has alleged that he, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery Homicide Unit in retaliation for the OJ trial. That is an incredibly heavy scenario.

    The IRS can determine what they think about my emails. You do not work for the IRS; you do not speak for the IRS; you do not know what the IRS is or is not doing with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud; but you are all over Leonard Cohen’s story and have contacted or been contacted by his advisers. In any event, your are not the IRS and what I am doing with the IRS is none of your business although you certainly seem to have inserted yourself into this situation for reasons that are beyond my ability to understand – including having Joff Belark target me and write a long lie disguised as an article. You have also asked LAPD and Boulder PD to target me and your “reporter,” Joff Belark, sent my son’s email (dictated by Douglas Penick) in response to your intimidation tactics with him to the Boulder Police Department. What parent wouldn’t take that type of activity seriously? Do you want to explain that to me? I do see that you are unbelievably focused on my communications with the IRS who I don’t think will be laughed out of court. I have directed you and your reporter, Joff Belark, to credible evidence filed against Leonard Cohen with my Motion to Quash his garbage attempt to silence me after Ann Diamond posted her draft article for Rolling Stone about me on the internet. Ms. Diamond’s allegations that Cohen molested his daughter (according to Freda Guttman) seemed to inform his fraudulent restraining order and activity that crossed state borders.

    What is this – a survey? File your complaint. This is frivolous. It harassment. And, I am convinced you are witness tampering and attempting to obstruct justice, etc. No one can ever convince me otherwise.

    I may not have met Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan but I can assure you that i know Phil Spector. These are his attorneys. I was dragged into his matter and told, by a District Attorney investigator, that I was probably a witness. What high profile attorney would take that lightly? None. How would you know if they communicate with me? You don’t know me and apparently don’t know them – even one of them has waved to you.

    I have a judgment against me because Cohen could not force me into an illegal deal – including an offer of 50% community property presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers. Robert Kory himself confirmed that there is fraud on every entity, the holding periods are illegal, and I have a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers. Cohen himself advised Brian Johnson, a reporter, that he was not accusing me of theft. He was, however, concerned about the massive tax hit. I think you can read – although I realize you like to ignore the facts. With respect to the psychiatric unit, this story scares ordinary individuals. I was dragged to King Drew, questioned about Phil Spector, and the entire file was falsified. Investigator John Thompson/District Attorney’s Office did not seem to take this story as a frivolous matter. Nor did he seem to think the presence of Inglewood PD at my home, the day SWAT descended, was a frivolous matter. There is evidence with Neal Greenberg and/or his lawyers, in Boulder, Colorado, that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested. As coincidence would have it, a custody matter was coordinated while I was at King Drew and Leonard Cohen’s lawyer and Betsy Superfon filed Declarations. Of course, Kory doesn’t know my son but my son “witnessed” a conversation between me and about Cohen’s tax fraud, the state tax returns that were missing, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. That is witness tampering, from my perspective, and the custody matter appears to be an attempt to obstruct justice and coerce or crush me into an illegal deal with Cohen. Intelligent human beings believe the FBI should investigate the King Drew matter. You can think whatever you like. You can also lie to Agent Wynar/FBI and quote him until the cows come home. Until Agent Wynar takes the witness stand and testifies under oath I’m not interested in hearsay. I would assume there are recordings of your conversations with him. Go into Court, file your complaint, stop harassing me and attempting to undermine my credibility, and I will – in turn – subpoena Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Treasury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Phil Spector, and Cohen. I can assure you that I will appear in court. I did not file an appearance in Cohen’s matter because I was not served the lawsuit, discussed this with Edelman and Kory, and the entire matter is fraudulent. I was not and never will be a trustee – constructive or otherwise. Please refer to the indexes of the corporate books and records with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and LC Investments, LLC that are filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder. You will also note that I was not a partner on LC Investments, LLC and, therefore, it is my firm position that Leonard Cohen himself issued illegal K1s to me.

    The fraudulent restraining orders were meant to silence me. Period. They are garbage and that is precisely why I told Sergeant Fernandez to throw Cohen’s in the trash and asked him if everyone in the State of California was assisting Cohen with his tax fraud.

    Actually, what doesn’t seem normal to me is to have people like you, Belark, Blaine, Sprocket, Sydney, Kelly Green, Susanne Walsh and others, utterly fixated on me – an absolute stranger – and playing games with a situation that includes major federal agencies. You have mentioned the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury many many times. Is your position that they are engaged in a federal prank here? Why don’t you address that issue? I reported tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I provided the IRS with a tremendous amount of evidence via email. I provided the iRS with my email passwords so they could review all emails between me, Cohen, his advisers, and others in order to make an independent determination as to what happened. Other people feel that the IRS is going to prosecute Leonard Cohen and there is a pending matter. They believe I am a potential witness for the government. They are wondering why Leonard Cohen isn’t in prison. Meanwhile, you have decided to target me and play games with me. You have also threatened my sister, her husband, and my son. I have noted this for the federal agencies and Phil Spector’s legal team who are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS, State of Kentucky, and others, and being dragged into the Phil Spector murder trial that does indeed seem to be a set up.

    Let’s revisit what was posted here last night. Who said I was a potential prominent government witness and stated that the IRS would be laughed out of court?

    Posted by Kelley PLZ:

    “Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”

    I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people – including you – understand that I am. That explains your motive in targeting me, lying about, slandering me, attempting to intimidate me, threatening me and my family, and so forth and so on. I continue to maintain that the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team should investigate your role here and subpoena all communications between you, the District of Los Angeles of Los Angeles and/or Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers, and others.

    Kelley Lynch

  168. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people – including you – understand that I am.”

    Uh, actually no we do not. We were conveying exactly the opposite understanding.

    Any pathology that would allow you to read our above post and come away with that conclusion is truly amazing.

    As we said, in your mind, up is down and down is up.

    Now if you will excuse us, we are late for a meeting with our other co-conspirators Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD.

  169. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, it’s time to put up or shut up. Your tiresome bad-mouthing, accusations, threats, libel, slander and unbelievably perverse distortions of the truth are getting you nowhere except perhaps another trip to a psych hospital. You have zero credibility, zero proof of anyones’ misconduct, zero legal counsel, zero support from anyone, and that is never going to change. No matter how you distort what others say to and about you, you can’t make it anything but the truth. Here’s the deal – either file your bogus lawsuit, or shut the hell up. I believe you are in your mid-fifties, Kelley Lynch; and while that is a bit early for senile dementia and/or Alzheimer’s to set in, it is sounding more and more that you are afflicted with one and/or the other. Even the criminally insane follow a certain path of logic. You do not. Not now, not ever. Not in the past and certainly not in the future unless you get some serious help. God help your children and your mother, because it is well past the time when He could help you.

  170. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, who cares about the photograph? It is none of your business and I can assure you that I will and have addressed Boulder PD. It proves nothing whatsoever re. Leonard Cohen because I reported his tax fraud well in advance of being targeted by certain individuals.

    Let’s look at the posting from last night. It’s on this Blog and anyone can read it and determine who posted it.

    “Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”

    I have no idea who the Browne family is but read that Donna Clarkson wants the same amount that OJ paid the Goldman family. Their daughter should not have been abusing drugs and drinking and she should not have shot herself. This is what the forensic science concluded. I have never said I only met Phil Spector a few times. I have known Phillip since I was 24 approximately. I am now 52. I worked for Phil Spector. I spent a great deal of time with Phil Spector. I know Janis Zavala Spector. She is also my friend. I know Phillip’s children – including Phillip, Jr. who died at the age of 11. Your interest in me – a perfect stranger – and Phil Spector is utterly fascinating and probably not a coincidence. The Clarkson family should sit down with Dr. Lee, Dr. Baden, Dr. Spitz, Dr. Pex, and Dr. DeMaio in an attempt to understand that their daughter shot herself and an innocent man is in prison. Attempting to take Mr. Spector’s liberties from him and his assets. Who knpws why Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden didn’t testify? Maybe it relates to Bill Pavelic’s extremely public allegations that they were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit. Your buddy, Blogonaut-Gianelli, quotes Bill Pavelic so apparently thinks he’s credible.

    http://guiltyofincompetence.com/lapd-hunt-for-dr-henry-lee-dr-michael-baden-b-pavelic-t99.html

    I think the attempts to glamorize Lana Clarkson, who mixed vicodin and alcohol, is dangerous. I have asked the DEA to investigate her death and Diane Ogden’s death. They have investigated other high profile matters such as Anna Nicole Smith’s death, Heath Ledger’s death, and Michael Jackson’s death. Since an innocent man is sitting in prison who witnessed a woman shot herself at his house one would think this is a serious matter for the DEA others particularly since prescription drug abuse if out of control in the United States. I have witnessed the affects of drugs like methadone, vicodin, fentanyl, etc. on people and it turns them into monsters. They do not know what they are doing at times and it is dangerous to both themselves and others. Period. Why the District Attorney has attempted to glamorize Clarkson is beyond my ability to comprehend. I also believe Baby Doll Gibson should explain why she went into Court in an attempt to testify that Clarkson was a prostitute who played with guns. Clearly that is relevant in this matter. Attempting to turn a suicide into a homicide is very dangerous business. There are teenagers that pay attention to what is going on in Hollywood. These drugs are glamorized and this lifestyle is glamorized. I am a Mother and find that conduct unconscionable. Please see Dr. Lee’s email to the LA Times. There apparently was no fingernail – which isn’t all that hard to figure out. What’s hard to figure out is why so many people and agencies are involved in the set up of Phil Spector and why you and others are dead set on undermining my credibility. It has been clearly stated on this Blog that I am potentially a potential “prominent government witness.” I do not believe, for a moment, that the IRS would be laughed out of court in any pending Leonard Cohen tax prosecution. I think jurors would understand that I am being targeted by cyber-terrorists who have motive to slander and trash me – including, but not limited to, Stephen Gianelli, Blogonaut, Joff Belark, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket (who I was told is the mouthpiece for Donna Clarkson), and others. Gianelli/Blogonaut has communicated with Cohen and/or his advisers; lied to Agent Wynar of the FBI; communicated with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson; contacted Invesetigator William Frayeh (an investigator on the Phil Spector matter) and is extremely interested in the IRS. That’s why I believe he phoned Agent Wynar and lied with him to begin with. I am convinced it was an attempt, as was his email to Agent Sopko/Treasury Department, to determine what they have pending with respect to Leonard Cohen. Please keep in mind that Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector in his grand jury. If that was the case, and I believe it probably was, I am convinced that Cohen perjured himself. I, after all, met the detectives who visited Cohen about Phil Spector. At that time, Cohen confirmed for them that his comments about Phil Spector – over the years to the news media – were good rock ‘n roll comments. The detectives were apparently surprised that his comments were 30 years old. Cohen does absolutely make an appearance in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine so one can safely assume that this is not a game. It’s certainly not a game for Phil Spector.

    How do you know what the Clarkson family wants? Do you know them? You don’t know me and have stated that – publicly – for the record.

    “Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”

    I have also asked Immigration to investigate why Leonard Cohen abandoned his green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988; why he would obtain a new green card in 1991; and, why DeSouza has not been deported. I have also asked if the District Attorney’s attempts to keep DeSouza in the country can be construed as “witness tampering.”

    Kelley Lynch

  171. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I have also asked Immigration to investigate why Leonard Cohen abandoned his green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988; why he would obtain a new green card in 1991; and, why DeSouza has not been deported. I have also asked if the District Attorney’s attempts to keep DeSouza in the country can be construed as “witness tampering.””

    And you wonder why others think you not credible?

    Oh, we forgot. Everyone except for posters on THIS blog thinks you are completely credible. The involuntary psychiatric commitments (plural), the $9 million judgment, the two civil harassment restraining orders, your daily emails to the IRS–all normal signs of a credible witness.

    Prosecutions by the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury and Justice Department expected ANY MOMENT!

  172. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Text of statement from Dr Henry Lee:

    Dr. Henry Lee is currently traveling abroad on a lecture tour in Italy. He has made the following statement regarding the recent slanderous and incorrect news reports of him removing and withholding evidence related to the Spector case. “1. Numerous police officers, detectives, crime scene investigators and forensic scientists from The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and L.A. Coroner’s Office conducted detailed searches of a small area in the foyer of Mr. Spector’s house on February 3rd and 4th, 2003, for about 38 hours. It is impossible for that large of a group to have missed a fingernail or a tooth. Dr. Michael Baden and I arrived at Mr. Spector’s house at approximately 9:00 pm on February 4, 2003, after the police had left and released the scene. 2. One prosecution witness, a former L.A. detective, accused me of finding a red-colored fingernail and putting that nail in my handkerchief. A second witness said Dr. Baden and Sara Caplan found a tooth and took it from the scene. Sara Caplan said that I found a white-colored object, similar to a fingernail-size object, and subsequently placed that object in a test tube. There are obvious and major discrepancies related to conflicting observations among the witnesses. In addition, there is no evidence that anyone involved in this case lost a fingernail. Lana Clarkson only has a small chip on one of her cream-colored, acrylic artificial fingernails. The minute size of a potential chip and the color of her actual nails are completely different than what the witness said about the alleged fingernail located at the scene. 3. As I stated several times before, I did not find a fingernail nor did I take any fingernail-like material from the scene. What I found was two small bundles of white thread-like fibers imbedded in blood. These two pieces of fiber were documented in my notes and photographed before and after collection. The materials were packaged, labeled and sealed in an evidence bag. Copies of my notes and photographs were sent and reviewed by four sets of defense lawyers and members of The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office over the past four years. What I have collected, the so-called “evidence” from a “released scene” has also been turned over to The L.A. County Sheriff’s Crime Laboratory for examination. My original notes, photographs and even the negatives were all given to the L.A. District Attorney’s Office. There is no basis whatsoever for anyone to accuse me or Dr. Baden of concealing evidence in this case. 4. I do not know why my Chinese accent has become an issue in this case. I am proud of my heritage and certainly see no relevance between it and the matter at hand. I have always believed that our justice system is committed to seeking the truth and all of the relevant facts. The fact remains clear that there was no fingernail at the scene. It is clear the motive for this slanderous attack is a tactic to kill the messenger before the message is delivered. I have all the documentation and records pertaining to what I did and what I collected at the scene. If necessary, I can and will make it public to protect my good name and my professional reputation. I have also contacted my personal attorneys to look into the legal issues regarding these unjustified, slanderous, false accusations, and the damage that I will likely incur as a result of these unjust misrepresentations.”

  173. Sydney Says:

    blah, blah, blah, blah, blah…

  174. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, everyone in America should now commit criminal tax fraud; abandon green cards; have off-shore accounts; obtain numerous social security numbers; and avoid living in Canada because there are tax and residence issues there as well. Why should Immigration take the fact that DeSouza perjured himself in Immigration documents lightly? Other people are deported for Immigration fraud. Cohen appears to have abandoned his green card and obtained a new green card because – according to what he told me – he had tax issues. I have provided the IRS with information relating to this and they can clearly speak to Immigration, review his residence history, and review how he filed his tax returns. One such document was a 1977 tax memo prepared for Leonard Cohen personally. That memo advised Cohen that he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had a residence (mentioning the U.S., Canada, and Greece) but cautioning him not to have a green card. That is the green card I believe he abandoned after Marty Machat’s death. Herschel Weinberg represented him at that time and there were serious concerns about tax issues, contracts assigned to certain entities – that related to record royalties and Sony, off-shore accounts, his numerous social security cards, and of course the green card he abandoned and re-obtained in 1991. Let me quote my former brother-in-law, Van Penick, who is an attorney in Canada; there’s no good news residence/tax wise in Canada “either.” Cohen had me speak to Van about his residence issues in Canada and Van determined that he had all the badges of a resident – including, but not limited to, residences, temple membership, and bank accounts.

    I see that you are obsessed and fixated on the IRS matter with respect to Cohen and my credibility as a witness.

    I see you continue to speak for the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury, and Justice Department. How about Agent Wynar-FBI. Do you speak for him as well? I know you lied to him and I believe lying to the FBI is criminal. I also think it’s rather strange that someone who doesn’t know me, but had his reporter contact me, went to the FBI about me to begin with – in an attempt to advise the FBI that I was spamming the Treasury Department. I hope the FBI has concluded it’s investigation into the Treasury Department and, specifically, why Agent Sopko-Treasury advised me to take my allegations of Cohen’s criminal tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS in Los Angeles.

    When will you be filing your lawsuit against me? I want to subpoena Agent Sopko-Treasury, Agent Tejeda-IRS, Agent Wynar-FBI, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler, Phil Spector, and Cohen. Believe me – I will respond to your complaint and will appear in court.

    Kelley Lynch

    “Prosecutions by the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury and Justice Department expected ANY MOMENT!” – Blogonaut continues to play games with federal agencies and now seems to think the State of Kentucky has joined the federal government in their “prank.”

  175. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut-Gianelli,

    Your meeting should be fascinating – with Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD should be fascinating. I’ve brought this to the attention of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Sopko-Treasury, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan. It’s amazing, to me, that you think Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, and/or Dennis Riordan would take this lightly. Your posts speak for themselves. Thanks for bringing up “Bird.” I didn’t overlook its vicious, malicious posts.

    Who cares what you say about me. You don’t know me but have targeted me and participated in cyber-terrorism and, in my mind, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness intimidation, witness retaliation, threats, etc. I am obviously entitled to my opinion that you have engaged in criminal conduct. Whether the federal agencies I have contacted feel the same way is something only they can know. I don’t speak for them. I realize you do, however, although you do not work for them and seem to think this is a game and/or a prank.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    “I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people – including you – understand that I am.”

    Uh, actually no we do not. We were conveying exactly the opposite understanding.

    Any pathology that would allow you to read our above post and come away with that conclusion is truly amazing.

    As we said, in your mind, up is down and down is up.

    Now if you will excuse us, we are late for a meeting with our other co-conspirators Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD.

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-212844

  176. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch if you wish to gain some kind of credibility, you will have to speak the truth al least sometimes. You say you have not reported ordinary bloggers to the IRS, DOJ,FBI, etc. Just in the past week I have received 16 mails in my private mailbox,from you, all cc’s to IRS, DOJ, FBI, Weinberg, Riordan and others, regarding my posts on Phawker, and that is from someone you clearly do not know, just a casual blogger, right?
    Do you have any evidence that all these public offices and lawyers ever receive your crazy mails? they may just have blocked your mails from their mailbox. You obviously have never received any replies.
    Do you have any evidence that, if Leonard Cohen did have a “tax-problem” that this has not been paid off a long time ago? and maybe just he did not feel it was needed to inform you about it?
    You keep on bringing up that “Blogonaut” offered to get you in touch with Leonard Cohen, “who would be willing to help you get your life and your children back, all you had to do in return was lie” . I am not speaking for Blogonaut, and they are ofcourse welcome to correct me if I am wrong, but the only thing I have ever read on Blogonaut in connection with “Cohen being willing to help you” was several months ago, when we all felt a bit sorry for you, and Blogonaut said that they felt many of your old friends in Los Angeles would be willing to help you, and maybe even Leonard Cohen would be willing to help you, if you were willing to get som help with your various problems.
    You indeed seems to have a very selective memory and presentation of the truth and facts.
    Susanne

  177. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Trust me, Walsh, I’m not interested in you.

    Kelley Lynch

  178. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh,

    If Cohen is so willing to help me why doesn’t he undertake to have a complete and proper forensic accounting done – that includes my assets that he has stolen from me. Cohen and his lawyers have the corporate books, records, stock certificates, etc. relating to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., etc. It would be immensely helpful if he paid me what he owes me. I don’t have any problems so I don’t need help with anything. Not to worry – I’m surrounded by excellent witnesses and have been so the slanderous allegations and lies won’t hold water.

    Kelley Lynch

    You keep on bringing up that “Blogonaut” offered to get you in touch with Leonard Cohen, “who would be willing to help you get your life and your children back, all you had to do in return was lie” . I am not speaking for Blogonaut, and they are ofcourse welcome to correct me if I am wrong, but the only thing I have ever read on Blogonaut in connection with “Cohen being willing to help you” was several months ago, when we all felt a bit sorry for you, and Blogonaut said that they felt many of your old friends in Los Angeles would be willing to help you, and maybe even Leonard Cohen would be willing to help you, if you were willing to get som help with your various problems.

    Y

  179. Kelley Lynch Says:

    An Open Letter From Phil Spector To A Good Friend.
    Sunday July 26th

    Steven,

    I had no voice the day I was sentenced in court on May 30th 2009 due to throat papalomas I had removed 3-days earlier on the 27th.of May. It left me with no voice. I was indeed very upset because when I was asked to address the court, I could not speak for I had no voice. What I wanted to say follows: Be it known that I, Phillip Spector had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the death of Lana Clarkson. And irrefutable science and five of the greatest, most famous forensic scientists all swore under oath that Ms. Clarkson died of a self inflicted gun shot wound, a suicide. They swore by irrefutable science. And while juries and judges lie and make mistakes, science and DNA do not. When their scientific findings and words were ignored is a mystery to me, and hopefully will not be ignored by the appellate court. And I shall return.

    But let it also be known that there IS a murderer in the court room and it is NOT Phil Spector, it is Alan Jackson. During the trial he murdered the truth, ,he murdered the constitution, he murdered the law, and he murdered my reputation, and he should not go unpunished for his dastardly deeds. He used his five little “groupies” women, one of whom recently overdosed and died from drugs, and could not be here to testify to slander and lie about me, and victimize me so that he could get his conviction without any scientific proof whatsoever. That’s because he had none. He lied and cheated and double crossed that before along with his cohort Truc Doe whenever they got to it, yes my friends, HE is the real murderer. But, what goes around comes around. And the appellate court will see through his chicanery and smoke and mirrors, and false law and overturn my conviction, and then I will be back stronger than ever, a free man as I should be. Until then, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

    Steven, I would like this published verbatim from the beginning of this letter to the end. And tell Chris Paven to also put it on my website.

    Thanks, Phillip

  180. Kelley Lynch Says:

    The two have already clashed, with Mr Cutler accusing Mr Jackson of “smirking and giggling like a little girl” when the deputy district attorney complained to Judge Larry Fidler about Mr Cutler’s abrasive style. He added that calling Mr Jackson “girly” was “not sexist. I’m quoting the governor of California”.

  181. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, the reason you have received emails from me is 1) you contact me from time to time – including to offer me your sympathies – by email; and 2) you are lying and slandering me and I am correcting those lies and slander. I’ve been clear about this. I will continue to address all lies and slander.

    Kelley Lynch

  182. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelley’s Email to Chief Mark Beckner – Boulder PD

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Chief Mark Beckner – Boulder PD
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 7:03 PM

    Hello Mark,

    Are your officers, who targeted me, meeting with Gianelli-Blogonaut who seems to have been communicating with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson and was in touch with Cohen’s legal team and is dead set on slandering me. Of course, Boulder PD is being used to undermine my credibility. That’s why I went to trial and that’s why I will continue to litigate my so-called matters with Boulder PD who is all over this story.

    Any thoughts on why Officer Storbeck rolled into Deneuve Construction? The Denver FBI thought the Boulder DA and/or Attorney General of Colorado (both copied in here) should investigate this matter. I thought the timing was interesting – I just hung up with “Officer Garrin” of LAPD after attempting to leave a message for “Officer Maurice Hampton” LAPD who – together with Erma Oppenhein – took me to King Drew and questioned me about Phil Spector.

    As Chief of Police, do you think Phil Spector thinks this is a laughing matter? Blogonaut-Gianelli does. And, of course, Joff Belark thought it was appropriate to send Rutger’s email to Boulder PD. Therefore, Boulder PD is all over this story, has been asked to target me and my son, and has been used to intimidate my son – someone I (and David Moorhead) view as a “material witness.” Of course, Phawker’s Blog contains interesting comments about the IRS being laughed out of Court because they are dead set on undermining me as a potential “prominent government witness.” I would assume you realize that witness tampering, etc., is criminal.

    Kelley Lynch

  183. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yeah Lynch and how is that working for you??? The more you try to be “clear” the more you discredit yourself and make yourself look stupid and insane.
    I did not say Leonard Cohen had offered to help you, Blogonaut said that he “may want to help you if you got some help” all the other things you claimed “was said” you made up yourself.

  184. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, I am clear on who said what. Blogonaut stated publicly that he had been in touch with Cohen’s legal team and/or advisers. He mentioned Robert Kory and Michelle Blaine. He wrote that Cohen would probably be willing to help me and that he, Blogonaut, could arrange that. This is how I interpreted his comments. All I had to do was lie. This is what I was asked to do before – lie and say Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. I am clear about your statements. They are posted on this Blog and need no edification. Are you now legally representing Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut. If so, read up on the laws re. lying to the FBI to begin with.

  185. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yes, I believe he said that Cohen would probably be willing to help you (along with several other old friends, if you got help) As I remenber he said nothing about arranging that help, and absolutely not that the condition was that you would lie. That, Ms. Lynch is a lie.

  186. Sydney Says:

    blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Same story, same accusations, same twisted words from the same twisted mind for, what, 5 years now. No logic, no trace of clear mindedness, no supportive comments, no sign of intelligent thought, no one responds to her 1,000 or so emails all over the country, no attempts to get a job, no let-up in her delusional accusations, no follow-through on threats of criminal prosecution. No nothing – NO NOTHING from a know-nothing woman who would rather spend every day and every night displaying her psychosis on-line instead of getting a job and supporting herself. Gee, what a concept – support herself instead of living off the tax-payers dollar and sucking up public resources that could be used for those who are truly in need and not just too lazy to support herself. Again, Kelley Lynch, you are a loser with no apparent interest nor cognizance of what a normal person does but instead lives off the public dole and threatens anyone who challenges her. Loser, loser, loser, loser, loser.

  187. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I don’t need help and have plenty of witnesses to this fact. Perhaps Cohen, if he thinks I need help, needs some himself. As you have read, he has a history of substance abuse, failed relationships, has taken psychiatric medications, used prescription meth (he loved this story about telling his pharmacologist that he wasn’t going to knock over a bank), and drank substantial amounts – of expensive wines (including Chateau Latour) nightly. I have not seen Leonard Cohen since October 2004 so he probably wouldn’t even recognize me. He also does not know the people I have spent time with since refusing to meet with him and his advisers – to unravel the corporate entities that he and his advisers created for his benefit. My young son’s father hasn’t seen me since Rutger and I appeared in Court to witness the sham custody matter that I view as an attempt to obstruct justice and Robert Kory’s Declaration is, to me, evidence of witness tampering with my minor son and a coercive attempt to crush me into a deal. After all, Kory does not know my younger son who asked me to tell Kory to “go fuck himself” after he witnessed our conversation about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats.

    Why would someone like Cohen, who has gone to such lengths to silence me and who destroyed my life and targeted my children and elderly parents, now want to help me? Any thoughts, Ms. Walsh?

    Kelley Lynch

  188. Kelley Lynch Says:

    You’re wrong, Ms. Walsh. Blogonaut offered to put me in touch with Cohen. I captured that remark made on his public Blog.

    Kelley Lynch

  189. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Did you also capture that “the condition for Blogonaut to put you in touch with Cohen was you you had to lie”?? or did you make that up yourself?
    Cohen has not targeted you and your children or parents, neither have the bloggers on the internet. You have created this situation for yourself.
    Oh what a language for a young boy to have (your son) I wonder where he could have learned that??? not from his “intelligent, credible, sane Mother, right?

  190. Kelley Lynch Says:

    That’s correct Sydney – the same story and the same accusations. These are not twisted words. They are true words backed up and supported by real evidence that I provided the IRS, Phil Spector’s legal team, and others – with respect to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. I have been telling this story for approximately 5 years. In fact, after receiving an email from the IRS website I began emailing evidence to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Substantial evidence. Some of that is now public record – attached to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s attempt to silence me in Boulder, Colorado proving to me, and others, that he is truly insane.

    I have absolute evidence, as well, of my attempts to find work and you will be surprised. In fact, I could probably compete for a Guinness Book of World Records title. I’ve documented my job search – since being “wrongfully terminated” by Cohen after I refused to hand over the corporate books, records, notarized documents, stock certificates, etc. and refusing to meet with him and his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, to unravel their creative tax planning and sham structures. I chose, instead, to follow Dale Burgess’ advise and sought legal advice from tax lawyers who confirmed, ultimately, that Cohen had used me as an unwitting pawn; noted in writing that all facts prove that I repeatedly attempted to determine the facts and whether or not something was wrong with the entities, etc.; and told me Cohen “exposed” me to criminal tax fraud. Since you don’t know me and have not reviewed the evidence I sent the IRS you really cannot comment on Leonard Cohen’s Tax Fraud Matter. You are, however, slandering me and lying about me which is quite bizarre given the fact that we are complete strangers and you do not know me.

    I have never threatened criminal prosecution. That would be difficult for me to threaten since I’m not a U.S. Prosecutor. I have asked for investigations into certain matters – including Gianelli-Blogonaut’s lies to Agent Wynar/FBI Oakland and want an investigation into whether or not he has attempted to obstruct justice, coerce me into what I believe would be an illegal deal with Cohen, and has witness tampered, etc. I know I am the victim of cyber-terrorism and, clearly, believe that and other issues need investigating.

    I do not live off taxpayer dollars but paid enough in taxes, over the years, to collect food stamps for a few months. I also paid the IRS approximately $165,000 in taxes on an entity that Cohen appears to have fraudulent attempted to prove I did not own. I want to know whether or not Judge Ken Freeman reviewed the corporate books and records and, if not, how he determined I was a trustee which I was not.

    Sydney, you’re not in third grade are you?

    Kelley Lynch

    Sydney Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
    blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
    Loser, loser, loser, loser, loser.

  191. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, I captured the comments. Why paraphrase. Gianelli-Blogonaut’s comments on Blogonaut’s Blog speak for themselves. I think I was and am being asked to lie. I have no issues, whatsoever, with substance abuse and therefore seeking help for issues I don’t have in order to have Leonard Cohen “help” me is lunacy.

    Cohen has indeed targeted me and my children. Explain Robert Kory’s Declaration in Ray’s custody matter – that arose after Ray witnessed a conversation between me and Kory re. Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that Cohen stole, and their threats. I thought Ray’s language was dead on – tell him to go fuck himself. That’s precisely what I thought. I think he learned it because he’s brilliant and saw right through his father’s insanity and understood what was going on. He also witneessed the conversation that amazed Boies Schiller. And, of course, he knows his father and understands that he is an abusive and malicious man who was just waiting to take him away from me. Why? According to Ray – because his father understood how close we were and, of course, “money.” That makes me think of his father calling Rutger as I was being taken to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector. Lindsey wanted Rutger to go in and sign documents transferring my house to Cohen/Kory. Douglas Penick, Rutger’s Father, can confirm this as Rutger immediately phoned him. Lindsey has not paid me what he owes me and his own son feared I would be murdered when I ended up homeless so this tells me that his father is capable of anything. In fact, I know he is and witnessed his vicodin abuse, gambling habit, vicious and abusive parenting, and the fact that he was hysterical about losing the publishing that included songs written by Mike Elizondo for Dr. Dre, Eminem, 50 Cent, and others.

    Kelley Lynch

    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
    Did you also capture that “the condition for Blogonaut to put you in touch with Cohen was you you had to lie”?? or did you make that up yourself?
    Cohen has not targeted you and your children or parents, neither have the bloggers on the internet. You have created this situation for yourself.
    Oh what a language for a young boy to have (your son) I wonder where he could have learned that??? not from his “intelligent, credible, sane Mother, right?

  192. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    We have never stated that we had been “in touch” with Robert Kory or Michelle Blaine.

    In approximately June of 2009 and after we heard from your former LA friends who urged us to consider that Lynch was a good person but simply had a serious substance abuse problem, we speculated (in the comments) that perhaps your ex-husband or Cohen might help you with the expenses of rehab.

    Hours later you assured us that you had no friends in LA–that your former friends were all addicts and worse.

    You later tried to spin this well meaning compasionate comment as a “bribe” to drop the (nonexistant) federal tax case.

    You read what you want to read and hear waht you want to hear.

  193. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Let me just clarify some further misinformatoin and/or lies. I formerly lived in a house valued at approximately $1.8 million and intend to sue Cohen, Lindsey, and others for the damage to my family. We lost our house solely because I refused to make what I was told would have been an illegal deal with Cohen. Period. Lindsey, who owes me money as well, inserted himself into this situation and is going to be held accountable. His son, and others, are already well aware of what this abusive and vicious man is capable of.

    I was Cohen’s personal manager for approximately 18 years. I was never his business manager. Rich Feldstein, however, was his business manager and Cohen’s letter to him in response to Rich Feldstein’s interest in meeting him face to face and advising him to pay estimated taxes is not to be believed. He had bookkeepers and was well aware of his financial situation. He had investors – Dean Witter and Neal Greenberg/Agile Group who handled his investments and as Cohen himself said was the guardian of the assets that Cohen and others wasted and permitted to be wasted. I made a substantial commission on the sale of certain assets. I would have made more had Cohen not insisted on a stock deal – based on his utter and absolute disdain for ordinary income taxes. Other years, I didn’t make all that much so let’s not over-glamorize the situation. I also worked incredibly hard and have been credited with reviving Cohen’s career. He himself, in Billboard Magazine, called me a blessing to him and his family.

    It’s Cohen who is in a fantasy world if he thinks Phil Spector and I are taking responsibility for his wrong-doing (civil or criminal).

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelley–Give us a break Says:
    November 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
    “Sorry, I didn’t hit the skids.” Huh?

    Obviously, we have a different yard stick for rock bottom. (For me morphing into a homeless ranting nutcase would be the skids, especially if I formerly lived in a $3 million home with a pool in a nice part of Los Angeles, had two wonderful kids, was a business manager for a well known music figure, negotiated multi-million dollar deals, and made seven figures in a single year.

    Perhaps I can put it in terms that you might understand: Compared to Leonard Cohen you are a dung beetle.

    You have constructed quite a fantasy world for yourself Kelley.

  194. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “We lost our house solely because I refused to make what I was told would have been an illegal deal with Cohen. Period.”

    Interesting.

    So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?

  195. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut-Gianelli, I was under the impression that you publicly stated that you were in touch with Cohen’s advisers and mentioned Kory and Rice. I captured all the comments and postings on your Blog that related to me so I will review them. Your words will and do speak for themselves. Michelle Blaine publicly thanked you on her Blog for targeting my Blogs and email accounts and you have publicly posted on her mControl Blog – as did Belark – which I also captured. Are you saying you didn’t?

    Why keep my former friends mysterious? I have no former friends in Los Angeles. I was surrounded by certain con artists who I have discarded. I assume you are not referring to Ron Burkle who is copied in on all my public emails. I can assure you that Mr. Burkle is a brilliant man and does not view my emails as spam and I can assure you that you do not speak for Mr. Burkle. I haven’t seen any former friends in Los Angeles – con artists as well – and, therefore, no one can address who or what I am. They certainly cannot say I have substance abuse issues because I do not and even if hell froze over you could not prove that. This is why I have, to a great extent, attempted to address your lies, slander, calculated comments, etc. – that would include Joff Belark’s lie about me disguised as an article.

    You absolutely stated that you were in touch with Cohen’s advisers and you publicly stated that you were not in touch with Steven Clark Lindsey who would have already helped me and, therefore, his insane excuse (if that’s what he intends to say) that he wanted Rutger to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory (while I was en route to Killer King being question about Phil Spector) is deranged and delusional. You did not state that Cohen and/or Lindsey would help with rehab costs/expenses. You are now embellishing your comments. Why you are so interested in me or helping me is bizarre, however, since we do not know one another.

    Some of the con artists who inserted themselves into Cohen’s tax fraud matter and the Phil Spector set up were absolutely addicted to vicodin, etc.

    I was offered 50% community property and Dale Burgess will testify to this fact – by Robert Kory on behalf of Leonard Cohen – presumably, according to my lawyers, to lie and say Cohen was defrauded. Has Cohen suddenly decided to take the blame for his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. If so – tell him to publicly make that statement and he can help me by repaying me what he owes me and has stolen from me. Agent Bill Betzer/IRS thought he owed me 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.

    How do you know that there is a non-existent tax matter? Do you work for the IRS or has the IRS confirmed this for you? I remain mystified by the fact that you feel so comfortable speaking on behalf of the IRS but, then again, you have no qualms – whatsoever – slandering and lying about a total stranger. And, you and your “reporter,” Joff Belark, intentionally overlooked the evidence I directed you to. That would be the evidence I have filed (so far) against Cohen with my Motion to Quash his garbage attempts to silence me in Boulder Municipal Court. And yes, I asked that that garbage restraining order meant to silence me be made permanent. I also advised the Court that Cohen’s entire Declaration is perjured – as is the process server’s Affidavit. As a lawyer, are you taking the position that perjury in a court of law is acceptable? Since I am convinced Cohen also perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury I would say he has a pattern of lying in court and to a grand jury. Of course, that is based on Mick Brown’s email to me advising me that he received a package with the grand jury testimony from Phil Spector’s grand jury and Cohen testified in that matter. He also appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine which is strange since he advised the detectives Steve Cron and I met that his comments (to the news media over the years about Mr. Spector) were good rock ‘n roll comments. No doubt Mr. Spector can subpoena the detectives notes and reports.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
    We have never stated that we had been “in touch” with Robert Kory or Michelle Blaine.

    In approximately June of 2009 and after we heard from your former LA friends who urged us to consider that Lynch was a good person but simply had a serious substance abuse problem, we speculated (in the comments) that perhaps your ex-husband or Cohen might help you with the expenses of rehab.

    Hours later you assured us that you had no friends in LA–that your former friends were all addicts and worse.

    You later tried to spin this well meaning compasionate comment as a “bribe” to drop the (nonexistant) federal tax case.

    You read what you want to read and hear waht you want to hear.

  196. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, of course it was ultimately do to the fact that I couldn’t make my mortgage payments but Cohen owes me millions and has stolen my intellectual property and shares of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Have you had a chance to review the corporate indexes? Had I made the illegal deal Cohen wanted me to make, and accepted the offer of 50% community property, I wouldn’t have lost my house – now would I? When you file your lawsuit against me I intend to call Dale Burgess to the witness stand who asked me to confirm for the IRS and Treasury Agents that he witnessed this offer and wanted me to be sure to confirm for them that my lawyers understood this was “criminal tax fraud.” I’m not sure why he wanted me to tell the IRS and Treasury Agents that my lawyers understood it was “criminal tax fraud” but I’m assuming it’s because they wanted to figure in a settlement amount (with Cohen) re. my “exposure” to criminal tax fraud after they told me that once fraud is brought to your attention you cannot make a deal. In fact, they told me I had two choices: amend the tax returns and/or report the fraud to the IRS. I reported the fraud to the IRS because of the complicated structures and tax issues and because I did not trust anyone to amend them. I have now filed final tax returns and am awaiting Opinion Letters from the State of Kentucky and IRS. Since other citizens request and receive Opinion Letters I can’t imagine why the State of Kentucky and/or IRS would discriminate against me even if I am a potential “prominent government witness” and the IRS could be laughed out of court if the attempts to slander and undermine my credibility work. They won’t. I’m telling the truth and you and others – including Cohen – are lying.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
    “We lost our house solely because I refused to make what I was told would have been an illegal deal with Cohen. Period.”

    Interesting.

    So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?

  197. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.

    2. We know that no federal tax charges have beed filed against
    Cohen because we subscribe to Pacer.

    3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense. You are a loon, and only the loon does not know it.

    4. So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?

    E-A-R-T-H T-O K-E-L-L-E-Y L-Y-N-C-H:

    When you stop paying your mortagage, the lender (who was not Cohen) forecloses. It is not the dog’s fault, your ex-husbands fault or Cohen’s fault.

  198. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I also intend to hold Cohen, Lindsey, and others responsible for the phantom taxes that have apparently arisen from the foreclosure on my house. Gianelli-Blogonaut are you sure you’re a lawyer? It’s hard to imagine a lawyer who doesn’t understand slander, defamation, libel, corporate structures, fraud, etc. Then again, you may have some ulterior motive and you were in touch with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson and have lied to Agent Wynar-FBI. Agent Wynar-FBI is going to have to take the witness stand and swear to the hearsay you have repeated on this Blog and elsewhere. Either that – or I will prove that you have perjured yourself because, at that time, we will be in court. So – either you lied to the FBI or Agent Wynar has liability issues and has slandered me although he doesn’t know me. It’s quite straightforward.

    Kelley Lynch

  199. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    I’m not an idiot so I think we’re finished with the mortage foreclosure issue. Why it interests you remains bizarre, however. Strangers are not usually this fixated or obsessed on people they’ve never met and don’t know.

    Who is appreciative that you are speaking up in the face of my emails? Alan Jackson – the Spector prosecutor who was in touch with you and may have found a sympathetic ear with you because you are dead set on slandering me and undermining my credibility – possibly as a potential “prominent government witness” as someone pointed out on this Blog last night.

    I also know that no federal charges have been filed against Cohen. I do not know that there is nothing pending, however, and I have repeatedly stated that you cannot possibly know that either although you have publicly proclaimed otherwise.

    It is laughable, to me, that a trial lawyer with thirty some years experience would engage in slander, defamation, and cyber-terrorism targeted at an absolute stranger.

    I see you’re attempting to keep Steven Clark Lindsey credible. Good luck. You’ll need it.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
    1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.

    2. We know that no federal tax charges have beed filed against
    Cohen because we subscribe to Pacer.

    3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense. You are a loon, and only the loon does not know it.

    4. So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?

    E-A-R-T-H T-O K-E-L-L-E-Y L-Y-N-C-H:

    When you stop paying your mortagage, the lender (who was not Cohen) forecloses. It is not the dog’s fault, your ex-husbands fault or Cohen’s fault.

  200. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli – Blogonaut, are you willing to take the stand and testify to this in a court of law? How could you possibly know this? Did Agent Sopko or Agent Wynar confirm this for you? I know that’s why you contacted them. That’s my conclusion anyway. Kelley Lynch

    We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you

  201. Kelley Lynch Says:

    On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: IRS Commissioner’s Staff
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 8:58 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me? Did Agent Sopko or Agent Wynar confirm this for him? This is precisely why I concluded that Gianelli-Blogonaut lied to Agent Wynar and contacted Agent Sopko. This is not mindless, innocent activity. And, how does Gianelli-Blogonaut know that persons on my emails documenting the destruction of my life are “appreciative for speaking up” but it doesn’t mean that were “in touch.” Gianelli-Blogonaut must be referring to Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, and perhaps Steven Clark Lindsey. I would say that I have a real liar on my hands – a real liar with motive.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.

  202. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli, you’re not reading Alan Jackson’s mind again, are you?

    Kelley Lynch

  203. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    KELLEY LYNCH ASKS:

    “How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me?”

    1. With Kelley Lynch as the whistle blower, it s simply a matter of common sense.

    2. The fact that over four years later no criminal charges have been filed (all the more so, with each and every passing day) also adds to our hypothesis.

    3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.

  204. Stephen R. Gianelli Says:

    “Gianelli, you’re not reading Alan Jackson’s mind again, are you?”

    One does not require the ability to read minds to predict your future.

  205. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: I Think I’ve Recognized The Federal Government’s Oracle
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 9:25 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,

    I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week – which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. I was told, in writing, that his penalties and interest as of October 2004 were somewhere in the vicinity of approximately $10 million with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC and that similar amounts were accruing with respect to LC Investments, LLC and Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. That does not take into account, from what I recall, the missing state tax returns and/or missing taxes due the State of Kentucky. I am also curious to hear the State of Kentucky’s position on LC Investments, LLC and specifically with respect to the illegal K1s issued by LC Investments, LLC in Kentucky. I filed a Motion to Quash Cohen’s garbage insanity meant to silence me in Boulder, Colorado. I attached evidence with that Motion – including correspondence from Richard Westin, the corporate indexes, and my lawyers legal interpretation of the legal issues between me and Cohen which is adequate for now. You might also want to review Dale Burgess’ fax to my lawyers advising them of the assets, etc., Kevin Prins/Moss Adams informed Mr. Burgess were missing from the fraudulent “ledger” Cohen attached to his bogus lawsuit against me in Los Angeles, California. I would also like the IRS and State of Kentucky’s Opinion on whether or not you view me as a trustee – constructive or otherwise. I did not view myself as a trustee and that is not supported by the corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, attorney/client memorandums, etc.

    I would also like to know how Stephen Gianelli-Blogonaut is able to factually state what the federal government or State of Kentucky is or is not doing. How would he know? I continue to maintain that he lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury in order to determine if there is a federal criminal matter “pending” and whether or not I am a potential prominent government witness who he is clearly “tampering” with in a blatant attempt to undermine my credibility as a witness even though I am a strange to him.

    All the best,
    Kelley Lynch

    That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho (gratuitous) blog or claim in your nut-job (gratuitous) emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.

    Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-212934

  206. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, Why is it a matter of common sense that you know for a fact that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me? That does not make any sense – common or otherwise. You do not know me and neither do the people slandering me on this and other Blogs so it would be impossible for you to say anything about me as a “whistle blower” or potential “prominent government witness” although you do seem dead set on slandering me and attempting to undermine my credibility as a witness. Of course, that will be impossible based on lies and you – a lawyer – know that you must prove your statements and allegations in court. You must also realize that the statements you have repeated of Agent Wynar’s and Agent Sopko’s are as of this moment in time hearsay. They themselves will have to take the stand – as will Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan – all of whom you have previously spoken on behalf of publicly.

    You did not say that your position that there will be no federal prosecution of Cohen was a hypothesis. See your own comment below. Thank you for confirming that you understand I am a whistle blower although I think of myself as a citizen who reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud. Your obsession with Cohen’s tax fraud and undermining my credibility is incredibly bizarre and one must question your “motive.”

    Kelley Lynch

    3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense.

    3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.

  207. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    You forgot to address the how you know that “many other persons” on my email list (documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into the Phil Spector matter that is clearly a set up) “are appreciative for speaking up” if you weren’t in touch with them. I assume you mean Alan Jackson and Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers since those are the parties I felt you were somehow in touch with. I think it’s obvious that I can and intend to subpoena all email communications between you and these parties and intelligent people have stated that “the feds” (as your crowd likes to call them) should seize your computer and Alan Jackson’s computer – probably others as well … say Robert Kory’s for instance.

    Kelley Lynch

    1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.

  208. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Alan Jackson – How Does Blogonaut-Gianelli Know These Things?

    Reply

    from Kelley Lynch
    to ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane
    date Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:42 PM
    subject Alan Jackson – How Does Blogonaut-Gianelli Know These Things?
    mailed-by gmail.com
    hide details 1:42 PM (1 minute ago)
    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    You forgot to address the how you know that “many other persons” on my email list (documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal and being dragged into the Phil Spector matter that is clearly a set up) “are appreciative for speaking up” if you weren’t in touch with them. I assume you mean Alan Jackson and Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers since those are the parties I felt you were somehow in touch with. I think it’s obvious that I can and intend to subpoena all email communications between you and these parties and intelligent people have stated that “the feds” (as your crowd likes to call them) should seize your computer and Alan Jackson’s computer – probably others as well … say Robert Kory’s for instance.

    Kelley Lynch

    1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-212954

  209. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,

    “I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week – which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”

    Good luck, Ms. Lynch. Haaaaha whoooooo whoooo, hahaheeeeee, hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Please contact this blog IMMEDIATELY upon ANY response from the IRS or the State of Kentucky expressly stating that Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted, in which event we will hurl ourselves, en masse, from the 17th floor of our building, because the world will surely be coming to an end at that point.

    “I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud.”

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

    You are so very amusing, Ms. Lynch, however unwittingly.

    But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.

    Ergo, unless you read about us and Cohen in the papers in the next few days or weeks, it is you that is, quite possibly, a looooon.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  210. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    It is unconscionable that you think tampering with what is clearly a potential federal criminal prosecution and a potential prominent government witness is a game and a joke. You are a lawyer and an officer of the court and cannot deny that you understand the laws relating to obstruction of justice, witness tampering, etc. It is nauseating to see you state, publicly, that if I am correct the IRS would be “darned annoyed” at your “witness tampering” and would charge everyone concerned. That is precisely what I have been saying and what I believe.

    I’m glad you think Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million is literally a laughing matter.

    Why would I have to read about this iin the paper in the next few days or weeks? Do you control when the IRS, or any other agency or individual, has to act – particularly in a high profile federal criminal prosecution with the set up of an innocent man involved? That is not amusing and I can assure you that Phil Spector wouldn’t find it amusing. Do you think the venerable Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan would? Go ahead – speak for them. Set the record straight on behalf of Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan.

    I think there is something seriously wrong with you and I know that you are an unstable, arrogant liar with motive. You have proven this to me – time and time again.

    Kelley Lynch

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: Kelley Questions Gianelli-Blogonaut About Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, et al.
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 9:55 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    This person is clearly unstable and deranged. Are you darned annoyed with Gianelli-Blogonaut’s obvious witness tampering? It is impossible to explain this away as frivolity and Gianelli-Blogonaut is a lawyer. The IRS would charge everyone if they believed this is witness tampering. That is precisely what I believe. Why? Because it’s a serious matter and criminal conduct. Look at Blogonaut-Gianelli’s latest posting. It is shameless and it is very very twisted and sadistic. In any event, Blogonaut-Gianelli is having a grand old time with Cohen’s tax fraud matter that I was told is criminal and the ongoing attempts to slander me and undermine my credibility as a potential prominent government whistle. He himself confirmed that I am a “whistle blower” and there are legal protections in place for whistle blowers although the District Attorney, Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Rice, Bergman, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Belark, Blaine, and others could care less.

    I am convinced that this is major witness tampering and Gianelli-Blogonaut should be prosecuted for federal crimes including, but not limited to, witness tampering. That is my personal opinion and while Gianelli-Blogonaut freely and publicly speaks on behalf of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce, Cutler and others, I do not. It’s preposterous and outrageous and possibly criminal conduct.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
    “To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,

    “I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week – which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”

    Good luck, Ms. Lynch. Haaaaha whoooooo whoooo, hahaheeeeee, hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Please contact this blog IMMEDIATELY upon ANY response from the IRS or the State of Kentucky expressly stating that Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted, in which event we will hurl ourselves, en masse, from the 17th floor of our building, because the world will surely be coming to an end at that point.

    “I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud.”

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

    You are so very amusing, Ms. Lynch, however unwittingly.

    But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.

    Ergo, unless you read about us and Cohen in the papers in the next few days or weeks, it is you that is, quite possibly, a looooon.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  211. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    PS:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  212. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    You’re not hitting the white wine by any chance, are you? It’s hard to believe that a lawyer with thirty years trial experience would behave like this.

    Kelley Lynch

  213. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Kelley Lynch said:

    “To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    This person is clearly unstable and deranged. Are you darned annoyed with Gianelli-Blogonaut’s obvious witness tampering? It is impossible to explain this away as frivolity and Gianelli-Blogonaut is a lawyer. The IRS would charge everyone if they believed this is witness tampering. That is precisely what I believe. Why? Because it’s a serious matter and criminal conduct.”

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA—WHOOOOOWHOWHOHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

  214. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: Stunning Arrogance
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com

    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:18 PM

    Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Is this nut really a trial lawyer? He is “proudly” witness tampering and challenging the IRS to charge him from what I can tell.

    Love,
    Kelley

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: Stunning Arrogance
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, “attorney. general” , attorney.general@ag.ky.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, “becknerm” , stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “LarryHank” , “Chief of PoliceJohn Hall” , “m.j. smith” , rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, “Robert MacMillan” , moseszzz@mztv.com, “Jewel of Activity” , “Thaye Dorje” , “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” , “RandHoffman” , lwieseltier@tnr.com
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:17 PM

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
    PS:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    You’re not hitting the white wine by any chance, are you? It’s hard to believe that a lawyer with thirty years trial experience would behave like this.

    Kelley Lynch

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23

  215. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    ps:

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAWhooowhoooooHAAAAAA!!!!!

  216. Kelly Lynch Says:

    They’re coming to take me away, HA HA
    They’re coming to take me away, HO HO HEE HEE HA HA
    To the funny farm
    Where life is beautiful all the time
    And I’ll be happy to see
    Those nice, young men
    In their clean, white coats
    And they’re coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

    You thought it was a joke
    And so you laughed
    You laughed when I had said
    That losing you would make me flip my lid
    Right. . .

    You know you laughed, I heard you laugh
    You laughed, you laughed and laughed
    And then you left
    But now you know I’m utterly mad!

  217. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    No, noone could possibly see the humor in Kelley Lynch’s assertions. HAAAHooooHaaaHAHAHA!!!!!!

    “To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,

    I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week – which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”

    HA-Haaaa–whowhoooo-Haaaaa!!!!

    Dear Kelley Lynch:

    We will get right on that…HAHAHAHAWhoooohwhooooHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  218. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Stephen Gianelli – Blogonaut: Witness Tampering, Etc.
    To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:38 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
    Proving, time and time again, that this is a game for him.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
    ps:

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAWhooowhoooooHAAAAAA!!!!!

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
    When you arrive in California late tomorrow to visit your son Rutger courtesy of a bus ticket provided by the Star of Hope and stop by to report us to your local police department please be sure to mention that you have outstanding warrants for your arrest and to give the nice officer the contact information for our attorney, Stephen R. Gianelli, who would be happy to fill the officer in on your activities and current legal status.

    Please do mention your arrest record in Los Angeles, California and Bounder Colorado and how all of this is pursuant to a grand conspiracy against you because you have been “targeted” to discredit you as a witness to Leonard Cohen’s “tax fraud” that you reported five years ago (with no prosecution).

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
    PS: do not forget to mention to then nice officer your claim that you were “kidnapped” by the LAPD and taken to a psychiatric facility against your will (Killer King), your previously published belief that LA Swat was there to “murder” you to silence you, as well as your claim that the LAPD then falsified its report as well as the Killer King records in order to “discredit” you as a witness against Cohen—all aid the “set up” of Phil Spector on murder charges. Please do also mention that this is only one of two involuntary psychiatric commitments that you have suffered.

    Law Blog Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
    Since Ms. Lynch is fond of publishing her hundreds of monthly emails to her various spam victims on various internet sites, here is our response to Kelley Lynch’s 12th email of today:

    November 18, 2009

    Dear Ms. Lynch:

    We do not understand why you are copying this blog with personal correspondence that you have sent to your son, sister, and brother-in-law–or at all–since you represented to us on September 3, 2009 that you would be dropping us from your email list—per your agreement with an investigator with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.

    Your emails (a dozen today) are unwanted spam. Clearly you are a very disturbed woman.

    This blog was required to ban you from commenting as a result of your habit of posting slanderous material about various persons.

    As you have recently advised us, you have been reduced to living in a homeless shelter despite living near your mother, sister and brother-in-law–who obviously are as tired of your daily drama as are we–to the point that they have (apparently) washed their hands of you.

    We are sorry that you have decided not to seek psychiatric help but at this point it’s not our problem.

    It was very cleaver of the City of Houston to provide you with a bus ticket our of their jurisdiction.

    If only we could do the same.

    What a shame that you have not sought help and that as a result instead of spending the Holliday’s with family, you are moving on, alone, once again to another state.

    Please do not contact this blog, our attorney, or anyone else affiliated with us again. We are quite confident that your mother, son and sister are not thrilled about your copying your emails to them to us and the rest of your spam email list (including the IRS, Justice Department, etc. etc.) either.

    –Blogonaut Law Blog

    Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    November 19, 2009

    Dear Kelley Lynch:

    As you know, I am the attorney for the Blogonaut Law Blog.

    You are hereby requested to cease and desist slandering Blogonaut, this office, and any other persons affiliated with us, on the internet, including but not limited to your blogs, or otherwise.

    If you fail to so desist, I will be suing you, David McCourt, Karen McCourt, Rutger Penick, and all other persons whom you have claimed to Blogonaut in writing have aided and encouraged you to pursue this course of action.

    Please govern yourself accordingly.

    By email, we are so informing David, Karen, and Rudger.

    This office is well aware of your current whereabouts in California, and is fully prepared to sue you, Rutger, Karen and David forthwith, should you post a single additional disparaging comment about Blogonaut or anyone affiliated with it, including the undersigned.

    Very truly yours,

    Stephen R. Gianelli
    PO Box 475013
    San Francisco, California 94147

    (415) 929-5130

    CC; Karen McCourt, David McCourt, Rudger Penick

    Stephen R. Gianelli Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    To cut to the chase:

    1. Kelley Lynch ha already sent over 400 emails to the IRS, the Justice Department, state attorney’s general, local DA’s, Treasury Agent Kelley Sopko, governors, mayors, media outlets and a hundred other email recipients falsely accusing me of “cyber-terrorism”, stalking, “witness tampering”, “witness intimidation”, and other serious felony crimes.

    2. She started doing this because she hijacked a blog that I am counsel for, Blogonaut, posted 60+ items falsely accusing various persons of serious crimes (manufacturing meth, child molestation, tax fraud, and other crimes) and was then banned from the blog. I then addressed Kelley Lynch’s emails and attempted comments on the blog that she had apprised high profile attorney Bruce Cutler of the situation and had asked him to look into suing Blogonaut.

    I sent Cutler a letter, he immediately phoned me, and we thereafter had several cordial telephone conversations wherein Cutler made it clear that he did not represent Lynch, he did not know Lynch, he had never even spoken to or written Lynch, but that Kelley Lynch had been leaving him 10 to 20 very long harassing voice messages for him EVERY DAY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, and that Mr. Cutler regarded Kelley Lynch as the “worst telephone stalker I have ever encountered”. Cutler also told me that Lynch had been sending him hundreds of very long (50+ page) unsolicited and ranting faxes daily for several months until his office complained to her then employer, who stopped the faxes from Lynch’s workplace.

    3. Kelley Lynch cc’d Blogonaut with scores of emails to high profile security consultant to Phil Spector Bill Pavelic, including a very disturbing email wherein Lynch, in the conversational style of old, good friends, asked that he assemble a team of investigators to investigate me, several Cohen attorneys, and man other persons. I emailed Bill Pavelic who informed me that he had absolutely no association with Kelley Lynch “who is obviously a very disturbed woman”.

    4. I emailed Treasury Agent Sopko, who called me back to advise that I should not be concerned with the scores of emails by Kelley Lynch to her demanding my arrest and prosecution because no reasonable person would regard Kelley Lynch as credible.

    5. I have been in touch with an FBI agent who told me I had nothing to fear from Ms. Lynch’s many reports to the FBI because Lynch was a “classic 5150” (cop talk for nut job).

    6. Lynch’s sister, Karen Lynch, and Lynch’s eldest son, have written to Lynch asking her to stop what she is doing and to cease involving them. Therefore, they have nothing to fear from this office. In fact, they have my profound sympathies.

    7. Kelley Lynch is a very sick and disturbed person, who in the past 48 hours has sent me and/or the blog I represent over 50 emails, several to her own family members (including her sister and son) cc to me, stating that her family members support her internet activities 100%, and that her eldest son (Rutger) is “eager” to join in a lawsuit against me, Blogonaut, and others. It is Lynch who involved her family in this very public slow motion meltdown hers, and not me or my client.

    8. We were advised by the Treasury Department and the FBI to simply ignore Kelley Lynch, but enough is enough.

    Personally, I have had it up to here, and will no longer remain silent about this internet and spam email bully—as mentally disturbed as she obviously is.

    –Stephen R. Gianelli
    415.929.5130

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    “Kelly Green, how do you know te IRS would be laughed out of court in “any case premised in any way” on my “testimony” where I was figured as a “prominent government witness.”

    Ms. Lynch:

    It is common sense, which is something you quite obviously lack.

    >How many people do you know (other than you) that have reported hundreds of others to the IRS, Justice Department, and others, based on their blog comments?

    >How many people do you know (other than you) that CC the IRS and a hundred others when they email their sister or son?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that send as many as 14 emails A DAY to the IRS, and have sent the IRS several THOUSAND emails in the last seversal years?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that write several emails a day for over a year to the same two high profile attorneys who they have never met or talked to, and who do not reply?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that have a $9 million dollar judgment and two harassment restraining orders against them or have been taken against their will to a psychiatric facility?

    > How many people do you know (other than you) that share ALL of the above attributes?

    Does any of this behavior seem remotely normal to you?

    No wonder you fancy yourself to be a credible witness. In your world up is down and down is up.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    “I have never said I fancy myself as a credible witness but apparently many people – including you – understand that I am.”

    Uh, actually no we do not. We were conveying exactly the opposite understanding.

    Any pathology that would allow you to read our above post and come away with that conclusion is truly amazing.

    As we said, in your mind, up is down and down is up.

    Now if you will excuse us, we are late for a meeting with our other co-conspirators Alan Jackson, “Bird”, Leonard Cohen, the LAPD SWAT, Sprocket, and the Boulder PD.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    “I have also asked Immigration to investigate why Leonard Cohen abandoned his green card after Marty Machat’s death in 1988; why he would obtain a new green card in 1991; and, why DeSouza has not been deported. I have also asked if the District Attorney’s attempts to keep DeSouza in the country can be construed as “witness tampering.””

    And you wonder why others think you not credible?

    Oh, we forgot. Everyone except for posters on THIS blog thinks you are completely credible. The involuntary psychiatric commitments (plural), the $9 million judgment, the two civil harassment restraining orders, your daily emails to the IRS–all normal signs of a credible witness.

    Prosecutions by the IRS, Kentucky Attorney General, the INS, Treasury and Justice Department expected ANY MOMENT!

    November 24th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
    1. Many other persons on your spam email list are appreciative for speaking up in the face of your threats. That does not mean we are “in touch”.

    2. We know that no federal tax charges have beed filed against
    Cohen because we subscribe to Pacer.

    3. We know that no fedral criminal prosecution willa EVER be filed as a result of any report by you based on our 32 years experience as criminal defense attorneys and based on simple commen sense. You are a loon, and only the loon does not know it.

    4. So the foreclosure had nothing to do with failing to make the mortgage payments, then?

    E-A-R-T-H T-O K-E-L-L-E-Y L-Y-N-C-H:

    When you stop paying your mortagage, the lender (who was not Cohen) forecloses. It is not the dog’s fault, your ex-husbands fault or Cohen’s fault. Law Law Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    We have never stated that we had been “in touch” with Robert Kory or Michelle Blaine.

    In approximately June of 2009 and after we heard from your former LA friends who urged us to consider that Lynch was a good person but simply had a serious substance abuse problem, we speculated (in the comments) that perhaps your ex-husband or Cohen might help you with the expenses of rehab.

    Hours later you assured us that you had no friends in LA–that your former friends were all addicts and worse.

    You later tried to spin this well meaning compasionate comment as a “bribe” to drop the (nonexistant) federal tax case.

    You read what you want to read and hear waht you want to hear.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    KELLEY LYNCH ASKS:

    “How does Gianelli-Blogonaut know, for a fact, that “no federal criminal prosecution willa (sic) EVER be filed as a result of any report” by me?”

    1. With Kelley Lynch as the whistle blower, it s simply a matter of common sense.

    2. The fact that over four years later no criminal charges have been filed (all the more so, with each and every passing day) also adds to our hypothesis.

    3. One can never predict the future, but as sure as we are that in the morning the sun will rise, no way will Leonard Cohen ever be prosecuted as a result of any communications from, or allegations by, Kelley Lynch.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    “To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,

    “I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week – which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”

    Good luck, Ms. Lynch. Haaaaha whoooooo whoooo, hahaheeeeee, hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Please contact this blog IMMEDIATELY upon ANY response from the IRS or the State of Kentucky expressly stating that Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted, in which event we will hurl ourselves, en masse, from the 17th floor of our building, because the world will surely be coming to an end at that point.

    “I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud.”

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

    You are so very amusing, Ms. Lynch, however unwittingly.

    But think of it this way. If your life view was correct, the IRS would be darned annoyed at our “witness tampering”, not to mention would charge everyone concerned tout de suite.

    Ergo, unless you read about us and Cohen in the papers in the next few days or weeks, it is you that is, quite possibly, a looooon.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  219. Kelley Lynch Says:

    from Kelley Lynch
    to ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane
    date Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:40 PM
    subject Re: Alan Jackson – Read Through Phawker’s Blog: It’s A Fascinating Study of Witness Tampering, Phil Spector’s Set Up, And Cohen’s Tax Fraud I Was Told Is Criminal
    mailed-by gmail.com
    Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
    hide details 2:40 PM (0 minutes ago)
    To the District Attorney’s Office,

    He’s all yours.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Stephen Gianelli – Blogonaut: Witness Tampering, Etc.
    To: *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:38 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
    Proving, time and time again, that this is a game for him.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
    ps:

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAWhooowhoooooHAAAAAA!!!!!

  220. Kelley Lynch Says:

    There’s very little humor in obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
    No, noone could possibly see the humor in Kelley Lynch’s assertions. HAAAHooooHaaaHAHAHA!!!!!!

    “To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Attorney General of the State of Kentucky,

    I have requested Opinion Letters with respect to this complex matter that I believe I have accurately documented. I have also provided you with substantial evidence and will begin reviewing additional evidence this week – which I intend to forward to you as some of it may not have been emailed as attachments previously. I want to be absolutely certain that everyone is in receipt of all evidence necessary to review Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.”

    HA-Haaaa–whowhoooo-Haaaaa!!!!

    Dear Kelley Lynch:

    We will get right on that…HAHAHAHAWhoooohwhooooHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  221. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. You are now “pretending” you’re the IRS and State of Kentucky? You’re quite sick and sadistic really.

  222. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject:
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:44 PM

    HAhaaaaawHOOOOWHOOOHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    Have us prosecuted?

    Very funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

  223. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:45 PM

    hahahahahawHOOOOOOOWHOOOOhAAAAhA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  224. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    HaHaHawhawaaaaWhohooohahaaaaheeeeehahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!

    Yes, we are unncle sugar now, HEEEEEEEhawhawheeeeheeehoooohoooHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

    Yea, you have it right Kelley, by your command Los Angeles prosecutor Alan Jackson will be invesigated by the INS for “witness tampering”, Cohen will bre prosecuted for “tax fraud”, and this blog will be charged with “cyber-terrorism”, “witness tempering”, and other crimes, and you, KELLEY LYNCH, are an “important” government witness.

    HAHAHAHAHAWhoooooHoooooHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    No, you are not a nut case…

    HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

  225. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli – Blogonaut,

    Sounds about right. Phillip did mention, on public tv, that DeSouza was here illegally and should have been deported. Leslie Abramson seemed to understand the implications. Hopefully, everyone at Immigration’s not stupid.

    I never said I’m an important government witness but did email the IRS Commissioner’s Staff last night’s posting about the fact that they will be laughed out of Court and the possibility that I’m a prominent government witness. That will be my honor.

    Continue to underestimate me, “nut.”

    Kelley Lynch

  226. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    I have no idea if I’m an “important government witness” as you have clearly stated – publicly.

    Let’s have a listen to Dave Matthews.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/davematthewsband?blend=1&ob=4

    I see Immigration is a central issue. I thought the same. In fact, I thought – if Immigration doesn’t do something with respect to DeSouza Phillip is being unduly prejudiced and discriminated against. Most people in DeSouza’s position would have been deported by now. Instead, the District Attorney – from my perspective – has exposed Immigration to extremely serious legal liability. I personally believe Phillip should subpoena Immigration to the witness stand. Who needs federal enemies or unneeded issues? I do not believe, for a moment, that everyone at Immigration is stupid and have seen them in action myself. One thing I noticed – they know liars.

    Kelley Lynch

  227. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Ode to Kelley Lynch:

    Remember Leonard when you ran away
    And I got on my knees
    And begged you not to leave
    Because I’d go berserk?
    Well. . .

    You left me anyhow, and then you sued
    And then the days got worse and worse
    And now you see I’ve gone
    Completely out of my mind, living in a shelter by day
    Blogging by night
    Or vice versa
    And. . .

    They’re coming to take me away, HA HA
    They’re coming to take me away, HAHA, Whooohooo
    To the funny farm
    Where life is beautiful all the time
    And I’ll be happy to see
    Those nice, young men
    In their clean, white coats
    And they’re coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

    You thought it was a joke
    And so you laughed
    You laughed when I had said that the IRS should prosecute you
    That losing you, lover, would make me flip my lid
    Right. . .

    You know you laughed, I heard you laugh
    You laughed, you laughed and laughed
    And then you left, and now you’re rich, so filthy rich
    But now you know I’m utterly mad!
    And. . .

    They’re coming to take me away, HA HA
    They’re coming to take me away, HAHA, Whooohooo
    To the happy home
    With trees and flowers and chirping birds
    And basket weavers who sit and smile
    And twiddle their thumbs and toes
    And they’re coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

  228. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Hopefully, Gianelli, you will be taken away in handcuffs.

    Kelley Lynch

  229. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, Leonard Cohen was never my lover. Gianelli, however, has clearly flipped his lid.

  230. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    You make us laugh Kelley Lynch.

    Ha-haaa!

  231. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I’m an “important government witness””

    hahahahahaha!!!!!

  232. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Dear Agent Sopko:

    Please arrest Blogonaut immediately…Alana Jackson, others too….

    HAhahahaWHOOOOOhahaha!

    Get it, Please arrest Blogonaut immediately….HAHAHAHAHA!!!

  233. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “For the record, Leonard Cohen was never my lover”

    hahahahahahahawhaaaawha!!!

  234. Sydney Says:

    What does Phillip Spector’s legal status have to do with Kelley Lynch and her insufferable, ego-centric and maniacal rantings about everything but the truth? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. She may have met him in passing at one point in her life; however, if she were truly an important “witness” for the defense, she would have been called to testify in both his trials; and she wasn’t. As a matter of fact, she would never be considered a credible witness for anything, anytime, in any matter. Kelley, you think like a broken record stuck by a crack in the vinyl. You repeat everything over and over again so many times that you are now identified by key phrases – IandmychildrenandmymotherhavebeentargetedbecauseIreportedLeonardCohenfortax fraudthatIwastoldcriminal;PhillipSpectorwassetupbytheLAPDandtheDistrictAttorney;IambeingtargetedbytheLAPDandBoulderPolicefortryingtoreportLeonardCohenthatIwastoldiscriminal…. And on, and on, and on, and on ad nauseam. You are a tired, old and demented poor excuse for a woman and a mother. What a role model you are for your poor children. And save us the crap about Rutger supporting you. You are simply full of crap and need to be put away somewhere to prevent you from further damaging anyone, including yourself.

  235. Kelly Green Says:

    OK, Kelley, we get it—reading comprehension is NOT your forte.

    But I love this: Kelly Lynch/intellectual property—now that’s a classic oxymoron.

  236. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    But sydney:

    Kelley Lynch is also FUNNNNNY!

    She now demands that the INS investigate Alan Jackson, and wants Treasury to arrest us for “witness tampering”.

    HAHAHAHAHooooohoohawhahahaha!!!!!!

    We have not laughed so hard in years.

    We are also sure that the IRS, Treasury, and Justice is having a good laugh as well.

  237. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Poor Phillip. The IRS, DOJ, Immigration, DEA, Etc. should stand firmly behind all of you while an innocent man rots in prison.

    Sydney Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
    What does Phillip Spector’s legal status have to do with Kelley Lynch and her insufferable, ego-centric and maniacal rantings about everything but the truth? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. She may have met him in passing at one point in her life; however, if she were truly an important “witness” for the defense, she would have been called to testify in both his trials; and she wasn’t. As a matter of fact, she would never be considered a credible witness for anything, anytime, in any matter. Kelley, you think like a broken record stuck by a crack in the vinyl. You repeat everything over and over again so many times that you are now identified by key phrases – IandmychildrenandmymotherhavebeentargetedbecauseIreportedLeonardCohenfortax fraudthatIwastoldcriminal;PhillipSpectorwassetupbytheLAPDandtheDistrictAttorney;IambeingtargetedbytheLAPDandBoulderPolicefortryingtoreportLeonardCohenthatIwastoldiscriminal…. And on, and on, and on, and on ad nauseam. You are a tired, old and demented poor excuse for a woman and a mother. What a role model you are for your poor children. And save us the crap about Rutger supporting you. You are simply full of crap and need to be put away somewhere to prevent you from further damaging anyone, including yourself.

  238. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut/Gianelli – Why would the IRS, Treasury, and Justice be having a good laugh over criminal tax fraud, the destruction of lives, a murder trial set up, immigration fraud, and other crimes? I can understand how “the feds” might have a sense of humor but I tend to doubt they’re cracking up over criminal conduct. Then again, you seem to be their oracle so you might know for certain. You seem to speak for them and are apparently challenging them on the witness tampering issue – which is quite sick actually.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
    But sydney:

    Kelley Lynch is also FUNNNNNY!

    She now demands that the INS investigate Alan Jackson, and wants Treasury to arrest us for “witness tampering”.

    HAHAHAHAHooooohoohawhahahaha!!!!!!

    We have not laughed so hard in years.

    We are also sure that the IRS, Treasury, and Justice is having a good laugh as well.

  239. Kelly Green Says:

    Kelley, you attack others and demand to know why others are speaking for the IRS, FBI, judges, etc. Why do you speak for Phil Spector and his lawyers? Why do you speak for Steven Segal, Oliver Stone, and Ron Burkle?

    Just how is Spector “being unduly prejudiced and discriminated against” if DeSouza isn’t deported? And just how has the DA “exposed Immigration to extremely serious legal liability”?

    In many of your rants, you go on and on and on insisting the DEA investigate, well, just about anyone who’s ever said anything you didn’t like. Sure, we’re all on drugs. Oh wait—didn’t you demand the DEA investigate your doctors when they would NOT give you drugs? Given your record for invoking the name of the DEA and demanding investigations, what medical professional in his/her right mind would give you anything stronger than an unmedicated bandaid?

  240. Kelley Lynch Says:

    And on, and on, and on, and on ad nauseam. You are a tired, old and demented poor excuse for a woman and a mother. What a role model you are for your poor children. And save us the crap about Rutger supporting you. You are simply full of crap and need to be put away somewhere to prevent you from further damaging anyone, including yourself.

    I haven’t said anything about Rutger supporting me. What’s the interest in Rutger? Intimidation? Witness tampering? Witness retaliation? Harassment?

    I see I am a very threatening and credible individual but I won’t be going anywhere and cannot be silenced – hence my emails documenting the destruction of my life copied to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Treasury, FBI, and of course , the Department of Justice since law enforcement told me they were playing a game with me. Direct quote – attributed to Santa Monica PD.

    Not sure why we’re so focused on whether or not I’m a “credible witness” and/or possible “prominent government witness.” Perhaps Gianelli-Blogonaut can send me more emails insulting the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – attempting to bait them and insulting them. I thought lying to the FBI was bad enough but throwing “witness tampering” in their face and publicly declaring that they are having a good time as well (at my expense) is really over the top and probably further evidence of criminal conduct including criminal harassment and criminal stalking.

    Kelley Lynch

  241. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut’s real thoughts on the Phil Spector set up:

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 8:10 pm
    You make us laugh Kelley Lynch.

    Ha-haaa!

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
    “I’m an “important government witness””

    hahahahahaha!!!!!

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
    Dear Agent Sopko:

    Please arrest Blogonaut immediately…Alana Jackson, others too….

    HAhahahaWHOOOOOhahaha!

    Get it, Please arrest Blogonaut immediately….HAHAHAHAHA!!!

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 24th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
    “For the record, Leonard Cohen was never my lover”

    hahahahahahahawhaaaawha!!!

  242. Kelly Green Says:

    Becareful what you wish for, Kelley.

    Let’s pretend there was criminal tax fraud. Who’s going to jail? The guy who may have committed tax fraud or the woman withholding evidence? The woman who vows to soon begin reviewing more evidence? The woman who’s mastered cut and paste? The woman who’ll turn over evidence if and when she wants to?

    What sort of trouble could that woman be facing? Criminal obstruction of justice. You see, Kelley, your foolish and childish actions have assured Cohen will walk away without paying one thin dime. When Cohen walks away from this, it’ll be because of your actions—you had to squirrel away all the “precious evidence”—everything that could prove he’s guilty. And then the only one who could possibly be facing charges is you: criminal obstruction of justice. (I hear the federal prison system has “fabulous” mental health facilities.) If you’re really lucky maybe you can get into camp cupcake.

  243. Kelley Lynch Says:

    The IRS Commissoiner’s Staff, the Treasury agents I met with, and Agent Tejeda/IRS are all aware that there was a tremendous amount of evidence in Rutger’s storage. I now have that evidence and the time to review it. I will be forwarding all of it to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the State of Kentucky, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan. Anyone interested in reviewing the documents should subpoena it from one of these agencies/parties because I will not be keeping copies. I do not have a storage facility and cannot take responsibility for keeping extremely serious evidence safe. We don’t have to “pretend” this is criminal tax fraud. I was told it is criminal tax fraud. Dale Burgess worked for the IRS and seems to know what he was doing and how the IRS works.

    Since the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and FBI are well aware that I have evidence which was in Rutger’s storage I tend to doubt this is obstruction of justice. Destroying evidence, which occurred, probably is criminal however. Cohen grabbed evidence illegally from what I can tell. Raoul Felder told me the Sheriff’s Department’s invasion of my home was probably illegal. I believed Mr. Felder who is an excellent attorney and understands the law. I phoned him, and spoke with him, the moment Sergeant Fernandez showed up to take the documents I was sending the IRS Commissioner’s Staff (with Cohen and his legal team’s full knowledge and awareness). Cohen has apparently attempted to obstruct justice, if I follow your logic and apply your rationale, by seizing documents that are indeed evidence and relate to his various social security numbers, immigration issues, tax fraud, off-shore accounts, etc. In any event, the remainder of the evidence is now being sent to the federal agencies that Blogonaut-Gianelli is insulting – about witness tampering, etc.

    Green, since you don’t know me and have not reviewed the evidence, etc. what’s your motive for attempting to undermine me – an absolute stranger? Sydney’s on Blogonaut’s Blog about Phil Spector so I’m clear about “its” motive.

    Kelley Lynch

  244. Kelly Green Says:

    The time has come to officially throw the bullshit flag regarding your trip to “Killer King”.

    Let’s review the reasons for the excursion: while you knew your home was surround by SWAT, you decided to exit your home while dressed in a bikini (and escorting your dog); when you were ordered to stop, you jumped into your swimming pool. It’s fortunate neither you nor your dog were shot. Your actions, and your actions alone, caused your committed time out at “Killer King”. I understand the conditions at “Killer King” were deplorable; however, the conditions at “Killer King” didn’t cause your committment—your actions did.

    Now here’s where the bullshit flag gets thrown. I’ve got a great life, and I’ve always had the means so I could do anything I wanted. I had the luxury of working as a career ‘medic for 20 years. In those 20 years, I transported at least a thousand 5150 patients. Do you still maintain the cops grilled you for information on Phil Spector? Kelley, no public safety official ever engages a 5150 patient in a conversation. We don’t have to. See every 5150 patient has something to offer—in order to avoid the committment they will say anything. The cops didn’t grill you about Spector—you offered the Spector information because you thought it would get you out of a stay at “Killer King”. You tried to “trade up”. In other words, Kelley, you foolishly thought your info would get you a free pass.

    How did that work for you?

  245. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, I have attacked no one. I have documented in emails the destruction of my life and attempted to correct the misinformation and slander on the internet – including this Blog. Is that a defense? YGianelli-Blogonaut is speaking for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, Bruce Cutler and others because I have spoken about Phil Spector? I most certainly do not speak for Ron Burkle, Oliver Stone, or Steven Segal. They will, however, be called to testify in various matters. Ron Burkle has witnessed this situation since 2005. Oliver Stone was dragged into this by Leonard Cohen who accused me of having sex with him – apparently as some defense to criminal tax fraud allegations. I called Steven Segal from UCLA Harbor when issues about the “IRS” arose. I also phoned Agent Bill Betzer from UCLA Harbor.

    Let’s take the ‘prior bad acts” law. DeSouza has apparently perjured himself four times in Immigration documents. This is relevant. Furthermore, Immigration does deport people who commit fraud in Immigration documents and it is of interest, to me, that DeSouza has not been deported. The District Attorney’s communications with Immigration, on behalf of DeSouza, are evidence of their attempts to tamper with a witness who apparently changed his story approximately eight times. In other words, DeSouza has a history of criminal conduct, motive to lie, and is not a credible witness. I think the District Attorney has exposed Immigration to legal liability but that’s for Phil Spector to say for certain. He did raise this as an issue on television. I’m sure we will see what unfolds, legally, with respect to DeSouza’s perjury issues and Immigration.

    That’s not true. I don’t like what you are saying or the fact that a mere stranger has motive to slander me and undermine my credibility but I haven’t asked the DEA to investigate you or anyone else for that matter. Forensic science concluded that Clarkson – who mixed vicodin and alcohol – shot herself. The DEA is an independent agency who should review the forensic science and other evidence. Since Clarkson died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound the DEA should investigate whether or not Phil Spector’s life was in danger. This is far more serious than the deaths of Anna Nicole Smith or Heath Ledger because Mr. Spector could have been shot. Diane Ogden’s death of a drug overdose is extremely relevant. She looked high on the witness stand and appeared to be having delusions that there was a “dead girl here” when, in fact, she was not present when Clarkson shot herself.

    The DEA can investigate anything about me and my drug history. I personally would invite that. They should feel free to speak to people that know me personally and they should feel free to review all my Brent Air Pharmacy statements and prescriptions. My personal doctor, Dr. Trabulus, was fastidious about giving prescriptions and I only had medication for asthma and my heart condition. I will be more than happy to give the DEA all my medical records without a subpoena. In fact, I would welcome that. They should also feel free to look at my bank statements – which were illegally seized by Cohen’s lawyers and, therefore, available free of charge I would imagine.

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S.

  246. Kelly Green Says:

    First, I am a sane and rational woman—and you know nothing about sane and rational logic and behavior; therefore, if you want to apply rationale, apply your own twisted logic. You do not speak for me.

    Now that I think about, you DONOT have evidence. You may report you have documents, but evidence needs to be given to law enforcers in a timely manner: 5 years is not timely. Well, I’m sure Cohen will be grateful you’ve held his documents in your son’s storgage unit (is there no one you won’t sell-out? Your own son). Everyday you keep the precious documents and don’t turn them over to the feds is another day Cohen gets away with the tax fraud you were told was criminal.

  247. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, the entire Killer King file is falsified. It is Kelly Annette Lynch and not me. The file relates to a 19 year old woman. It is not my social security number, date of birth, religion, place of birth, or my social security number. It is, however, my address and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number. The fact that you are raising it as an issue proves, absolutely – to me, that this was an attempt to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent government witness” for the IRS in any pending matter related to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. That is precisely why I believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team should investigate why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector while Rutger was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Leonard Cohen/Robert Kory – by Steven Clark Lindsey who coordinated a custody matter at the same time and filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that matter. Of course, my younger son witnessed a conversation with Kory about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. The Killer King situation and report cannot be explained.

    I was in a bikini because I didn’t realize SWAT would show up. Did the SWAT team roll by because I was in a bikini? This has been suggested. In fact, someone thought SWAT rolled by for a date. I was never ordered to do anything – whatsoever. Good point – an officer told Rutger that both I and my dog would be shot. They also told Rutger that my dog was my hostage and they were taking precautions. Unfortunately, Steven Clark Lindsey was witnessed lying to SWAT and my young son was at the bottom of the hill with Cloris Leachman. There were quite a number of witnesses present for that incident. Dr. D’Angelo did not agree with LAPD so LAPD has very very serious legal issues. My actions did not cause the SWAT team to descend on my home and there is evidence with Neal Greenberg’s lawyers in Colorado that Leonard Cohen, Steven Clark Lindsey, Robert Kory, and Betsy Superfon “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. That is now evidence in a court of law. “The feds” also understand the conditions were deplorable at Killer King. They shut the place down. Steve Cooley must understand, from his office’s Internal Memorandum, that there were serious issues with Killer King as well – including the fact that his Deputy District Attorney questioned the credibility of Luis Pena and felt he would lie and/or cover up for political reasons and/or job security. Pena was the coroner in the Phil Spector matter who testified that he could not disregard the possibility that Clarkson shot herself. I wasn’t committed. I was released.

    The cops didn’t grill me about Phil Spector. The cops questioned me about Phil Spector. I guess things were different this time for “public safety” officials and that is an incredibly sweeping statement that I tend to doubt you could prove. It is, no doubt, speculative and really quite superfluous. Actually I didn’t say anything. I asked if I would be in danger and was told, by Erma Oppenhein “this will be good for you.” I refused to speak to the medical personnel at Killer King and that is reflected in the Killer King documents. They lacked any authorization, whatsoever, to treat me. I offered nothing about Phil Spector. I think you’ve watched too much CSI or cop shows – ie., “trade up.” You’re not law enforcement or the District Attorney, are you? I didn’t need a free pass. Dr. D’Angelo didn’t agree with the police officers and promptly released me. The three hour ride to Killer King was a bit bizarre given the fact that UCLA was 8 minutes away.

    Kelley Lynch

    The cops didn’t grill you about Spector—you offered the Spector information because you thought it would get you out of a stay at “Killer King”. You tried to “trade up”. In other words, Kelley, you foolishly thought your info would get you a free pass.

    How did that work for you?

  248. Kelly Green Says:

    Whether or not Lana Clarkson took perscription vicodin did not endanger Spector’s life—the gun HE foolishly kept in a drawer endangered Lana Clarkson’s life—he killed her.

    What gives you the authority to decide if Diane Ogden looked high or was delusional while testifying? Neither of us was present in the courtroom; although I did watch her testimony on tv and she neither appeared high or delusional.

  249. Kelley Lynch Says:

    What’s rational about a person slandering and attacking me who does not know me? What’s rational about your obsession/fixation with me, Phil Spector, and Cohen? You are right about that – I do not speak for you. I do, however, question your motives.

    Think what you like. I have evidence and I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff with ample evidence regarding Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Please email the IRS Commissioner’s Staff directly with your concerns about evidence. I spoke to the Treasury agents about this and brought it up with Agent Tejeda/IRS. Does evidence need to be given to law enforcement in a timely manner? How about the evidence Cohen illegally seized that was being sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff? Has that been sent to the IRS? If I wanted to sell anyone out I would have accepted Cohen’s offer of 50% community property – presumably to lie to the IRS and testify that his advisers defrauded him. That’s not what I witnessed so this is evidence that I sold out no one. Please speak to the “feds” about the evidence. Here are their email addresses. I sent the evidence to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff at *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov. Contact them if you would like to review it.

    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.go

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. And I was also told, by Dale Burgess, that Criminal Intelligence of the IRS should be involved here and that the IRS should be aware that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud.

  250. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Actually, Bill Pavelic emailed me that Jay Romaine could have testified that the gun Clarkson shot herself with was not his. I believe I have heard other statements that the gun was not Phillip’s. I think the fact that a woman shot herself in Phil Spector’s house – after mixing vicodin and alcohol – is evidence that Clarkson endangered Phil Spector’s life. Additionally, she could have shot him. People who abuse prescription drugs frequently, when high, do not think correctly. Phil Spector didn’t kill Clarkson. She shot herself. That’s why Dr. Lee and Dr. Baden had to be set up – by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit (according to Bill Pavelic). Their message might have driven this point home to the jury. And that’s precisely why I believe the DOJ, FBI, and DEA should speak to Dr. Lee, Dr. Baden, Dr. Spitz, Dr. Pex, and Dr. DeMaio. These agencies should understand forensic science – that concluded this was a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

    I have no authority. I just thought Ogden looked high on the stand. She also appeared to be preening for the judge. Please see the Bruce Cutler smack down. In any event, Ogden did die of a drug overdose so it’s not a stretch to conclude that she was high on the witness stand, is it?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bOk_TWMQjY

    I see – you thought Ogden seemed normal? Then where was the dead girl “here” that she was talking about and why did she have to be “told” to tell the truth?

    Kelley Lynch

    What gives you the authority to decide if Diane Ogden looked high or was delusional while testifying? Neither of us was present in the courtroom; although I did watch her testimony on tv and she neither appeared high or delusional.

  251. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Ogden also stated that she worked for Phil Spector in 1988 and 1989 when I did. That came as a complete surprise to me. I never spoke to her and his calls were forwarded to my house all day every day. I did speak with Janis Zavala Spector frequently though.

  252. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Wed, 11/25/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Garrison Courtney – DEA
    To: “Blogonaut Law-Blog” , doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ikeitel@abkco.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, moseszzz@mztv.com
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, “Kelley Lynch” , washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov
    Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 8:03 AM

    Hello Mr. Courtney,

    Perhaps the DEA would like to review what’s going on with Phawker.com. There is unbelievable interest in Phil Spector’s matter, Clarkson’s suicide, and – of course – Leonard Cohen’s criminal tax fraud. Blogonaut-Gianelli is happily witness tampering, lying to the FBI, and insulting “the feds.”

    All the best,
    Kelley

  253. Kelley Lynch Says:

    http://www.spike.com/blog/dea-premiere/64236

    Garrison Courtney DEA 202-307-2402 Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov

  254. Kelly Green Says:

    I’ve never watch CSI and since watching old re-runs of CAR 54, I haven’t watched cop shows. And I’m no fan of cops.

    It’s fascinating you report in regards to questions about Spector: “Actually I didn’t say anything.” So you’re saying you NEVER said anything to the cops about Spector while you were enroute to “Killer King”? Well, if you didn’t say anything about Spector, how could you be a potential witness at his trial?

    Next time you encounter a cop, firefighter or EMT, ask them when was the last time they engaged a 5150 patient in conversation. You’ll hear groans and chuckles.

  255. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, what is your point? I didn’t think you were a forensic expert. The Phil Spector murder trial, that I am convinced was a set up, was not a “tv show” although I realize (and was told by the DA’s Office) that Alan Jackson was on tv. Perhaps that’s how my Mother noticed that he was a “big phoney.”

    That’s right. I didn’t answer any questions Erma Oppenhein asked me about Phil Spector and guns. I have no idea how I was a “probable witness” in the Phil Spector matter. John Thompson, however, will receive a subpoena and can explain why he told me that. I personally didn’t understand how I could be a witness in Phillip’s set up because I didn’t see Clarkson shoot herself. Phillip did and told me that it was devastating to witness – as one might imagine.

    I know how a cop will respond when I discuss being taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Officer Garrin called Boulder PD and sent them into Deneuve Construction. That prompted the FBI in Denver to advise me to contact the District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General of Colorado in order to have an investigation done. I did and will subpoena Mary Lacy – former Boulder DA, Chief Mark Beckner, and others to the stand. Be clear about that. That’s why they’re copied in on my emails documenting the fact that corrupt law enforcement and corrupt government officials are all over this story and that’s precisely why I contacted the “FBI.” I did not, however, lie to them. Gianelli did. Proudly apparently.

    Kelley Lynch

  256. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Garrin wasn’t chuckling. He was aggressiveand unprofessional and that’s why I asked him if he thought he was in a detective show. I also filed a complaint about him with LAPD’s Internal Affairs.

  257. Kelly Green Says:

    Regarding evidence being turned over in a timely manner: It’s called the statute of limitations. In regards to criminal matters, and with the exception of murder, the gov’t can only prosecute a crime within somany years after the crime ocurred; in regards to civil torts, a plaintiff can only sue a defendant within so many years – intentional tort (generally 2 years tho sometimes 3 years). Because all the things you want to litigate were intentional torts, the 2 year period has expired; therefore, you will be unable to sue anyone.

    Regarding Diane Ogden, I never said she seemed normal; I said she didn’t appear high or delusional.

  258. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, please contact the IRS Commissioner’s Staff directly. I would assume that they understand statutes as they relate to criminal tax fraud. They must also understand how evidence is to be handled and processed. I am glad you realize there are intentional torts here. I am completely uninterested in your legal opinions and suggest you review RICO and its statutes and discovery periods. Here’s a hint: Cohen’s fraudulent judgment, based on perjury, was entered in May 2006. Now – count four years.

    Call Ogden abnormal or whatever you like. She appeared to me personally to be high, delusional, and confused. She did die of a drug overdose so she could very well have been high on the witness stand. Most “addicts” need their meds.

  259. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Of course I can’t reasonably discover if the IRS believes Cohen committed criminal tax fraud until I have their Opinion or they file a Complaint.

    Many people are mistaken that civil RICO claims are not subject to a statute of limitations. True, Congress failed to include a statute of limitations when it passed the RICO Act, but the United States Supreme Court has remedied that oversight and imposed a four-year statute of limitations on all civil RICO claims.

  260. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.P.S. This is why I’m waiting for Opinion Letters from the IRS and State of Kentucky. No reasonable person could be asked to “guess” about these complex structures, corporate shams, and egregious tax fraud.

    a four-year statute of limitations on all civil RICO claims. Civil Rico’s statute of limitations begins to run when the victim discovers or reasonably should have discovered its injury. Many people also believe that the statute of limitations is reset every time a new criminal act is committed – this is not true. Once a victim is aware or should be aware of its injury, the victim has four years to discover the remaining elements of its claim and bring suit. A victim cannot sit on its rights and refrain from filing suit in the face of known injuries. That being said, however, there are several equitable doctrines that may toll or suspend the running of the statute of limitations. If a defendant fraudulently conceals facts that are essential to the victim’s ability to purse its rights, the running of the statute of limitations may be tolled. In addition, acts of duress, such as “if you sue me, I’ll kill you,” may toll the running of the statute of limitations. All tolling doctrines are based upon whether it is fair, under the circumstances, to bar the victim’s claims on the basis of the running of the statute of limitations. Also, if a defendant engages in a new pattern of rackeeting, that causes new and independent injuries, a new limitations period may apply to those new and independent injuries.

  261. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Please note: I need a complete and proper forensic accounting and believe Cohen and his advisers are engaging in “fraudulent concealment.’ Clearly I can’t file suit until I have this information which is why Cohen’s garbage perjured fraudulent restraining order, meant to silence me, is nothing other than an IRS matter and also obstruction of justice because I would like the IRS to have that “evidence.” Cohen and his lawyers should be in possession of the Moss Adams due dilgence with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and the intellectual property. CAK undertook due diligence – as did the Grubman Indursky firm.

  262. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Ms. Green, what’s your position on Cohen withholding “evidence’ – ie., the complete and proper forensic accounting I have repeatedly requested and would like to provide the IRS with? You seem to be an “evidence’ expert. Please do study up on RICO – civil and criminal. Kelley Lynch

  263. Kelly Green Says:

    Yes, I do agree that some people who abuse perscription drugs, and when high, may not act normally. When alive, a cop can detect whether a suspect is high with the single flicker of flashlight—that’s why cops approach stopped cars with their flashlight in hand.

    You make reference to those who could have testified on Spector’s behalf but didn’t. Why didn’t Dr Lee testify? For God’s sake, he’s Dr frickin Lee–his reputation would have survived and any jury would believe him. Why didn’t Dr Baden testify at the second trial? By the time PS2 came around Baden’s wife was long gone; undoubtedly, Baden could define the phrase conflict of interest by PS2. Why didn’t John Thompson testify? Give us a break; if all these people had proof of Spector’s innocence, why didn’t they testify. Are you asking us to believe Spector sits in prison because others were too afraid to testify? Dr Pex testified—and during his testimony the judged had to dismiss the jury and advise Pex of his Miranda rights–Pex perjured himself. Eventhough the judge Mirandized Pex, Pex continued to testify.

  264. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I see – cops can detect whether someone’s high with a single flicker of a flashlight. They’re see-in-the-dark opthamologists, right? I’m not convinced a jury would buy that but I understand that they also frequently misperceive “bulges” as guns. They usually approach cars with their hand on their guns.

    You should write Dr. Lee directly and ask him why. Dr. Lee stated publicly that he might take legal action so we have to see what he decides to do. I can’t imagine him permitting Alan Jackson and others to destroy his reputation and falsely accuse him of crimes like obstruction of justice. That’s a preposterous notion – particularly given his spotless career history. Please write Dr. Baden directly. I cannot answer that. I did find his “Ah Ha” moment revealing. Why would there be a conflict with Dr. Baden and Linda Kenny Baden? That’s preposterous. They are consummate professionals and forensic experts from what I can tel. I have no idea why Investigator John Thompson didn’t testify. He probably didn’t know Phil Spector or witness Clarkson shoot herself.

    No. I think Phil Spector’s sitting in prison because he was demonized by gossip and hearsay and highly embellished stories told by witnesses I did not find credible in the least. I believe the jurors wilfully overlooked evidence and have heard that some of them (Juror #9 in the first trial, for instance, with respect to Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations site) they were all over the internet. That’s hearsay but I’m certain it can be investigated and I have no doubt that it will be investigated by Mr. Spector, his legal team, and investigators. I think the incident with Dr. Pex should be investigated by the DOJ and FBI because it appeared to be a “terrorist threat” and unconscionable. Dr. Pex’s response was dead on.

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. For someone slandering and trashing me, a total stranger, you certainly are knowledgeable about the Phil Spector murder trial. Why aren’t you familiar with the forensic science?

  265. Kelly Green Says:

    Well, if you didn’t see Diane Ogden’s testimony ( in person or on tv), how could she appear “to be high, delusional, and confused?” You report “she did die of a drug overdose so she could very well have been high on the witness stand.” Sure she was.

    Cohen doesn’t have to provide you with a forensic accounting, proper or otherwise. You don’t work for him anymore. You stole everything of his you could get your hands on; and yet, he’s never had you arrested for anything. Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.

  266. Kelly Green Says:

    Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.

  267. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, see Bruce Cutler’s so-called smack down. Ogden appears to be high. That is my personal opinion and the end of that discussion. It’s relative and subjective and you cannot change my mind. The news media reported that Ogden died of a drug overdose and Phil Spector confirmed this. Do you have evidence proving that she wasn’t hight? I doubt it. Therefore, it will always be in question.

    Cohen does have to provide me with a complete and proper forensic accountant. He perjured himself in his legal bullshit in Los Angeles and attached an incomplete and bogus “ledger” which was documented by Dale Burgess after meeting with Cohen’s own accountant – Kevin Prins/Moss Adams – who advised what assets were missing from the accounting. I stole absolutely nothing and Cohen publicly stated that he was not accusing me of theft. He did steal my intellectual property and the corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents prove this. What evidence have you reviewed – or are you relying on fraud and hearsay? Perhaps someone can arrest Cohen for stealing from me. I will note this as a “threat.” Cohen’s attorney can argue whatever he wants. After witnessing these legal antics Cohen should seriously consider proper representation. Most of the evidence was given to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff in 2005 and none of it was altered. Forensic science can prove that as can notarized documents. Other parties were and are in possession of much of this evidence – including Boies Schiller. It was also reviewed by Bert Deixler. How wiould you know what every judge will do? Not every judge is in the District Attorney’s pocket – which is apparently what’s going on with Larry Fidler who appeared to throw two trials for the prosecution. Let’s discuss his insane jury instructions. They caused the jurors to change their minds and they were withdrawn. What do you think Dennis Riordan’s position will be on that matter? No one will ever know if the verdict would have been “not guilty.”

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. Your slander is becoming increasingly aggressive.

    Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.

  268. Kelly Green Says:

    Well, Kelley, Spector’s forensic science was laughable. Neither jury bought into it. It really is time for you to let go of PS1. It was a hung jury—and Spector remained free for an extra year. It’s outrageous of you to speculate that the jurors from either trial (specifically juror #9 from PS1) were perusing the internet while serving jury duty. If you had the tiniest speck of eveidence to prove that true, you would have posted it on some website—you wouldn’t be able to help yourself.

    Make no mistake, I have neither slandered or trashed you. Your actions speak for themselves.

    You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.

  269. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, I’m not having a “cop” argument with you. That’s correct – I’m not a junkie-addict expert. Never claimed to be. Don’t like to be around them. I’ve noticed they can become monsters and don’t think correctly. The DEA may be experts on junkies and addicts though.

    If a cop approaches me with a flashlight he better be on the phone with his lawyer. I view this as a very serious threat and will bring this to the attention of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury. Corrupt law enforcement is all over this story. In any event, I don’t do drugs so the cops will have trouble setting me up.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
    Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.

  270. Kelly Green Says:

    OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?

    There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.

  271. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, you don’t have any “corrupt cops” on your payroll that would like to use a “flashlight” on me, do you?

    I don’t think Mr. Spector’s forensic science was laughable and that’s why Jackson had to attack the scientists personally. No one believes five expert forensic scientists lied. We don’t know what the verdict would have been. Fidler’s jury instructions essentially juror tampered and changed their minds. I can speculate about anything I want. I think Juror #9 was communicating with Alan Jackson and concluded that based on the speed with which he connected with him immediately following the trial. Paul Huebl, an investigator who attended the trial, thought Juror #9 was on Sprocket’s Blog. Please see his Blog for further details. Phil Spector has extraordinary lawyers and investigators. I have no doubt that he will investigate whether the jurors were perusing the internet. He couldn’t ignore this possibility.

    Make no mistake – you have slandered me and your words are now public and will be used in a court of law. Assume anything you want to the contrary. Your interest in Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s trial, and me comes across loud and clear and seems to indicate “motive.” Motive to undermine me as a potential government witness or any type of witness at all.

    You’re on the internet. What is this – do as I say, not as I do?

    I think we’ll leave the gratuitous Thanksgiving garbage as it is – preposterous after what you have attempted to do to me.

    Kelley Lynch

    You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.

  272. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, go prepare your Thanksgiving dinner and sign off as you advised me you were doing. I’m merely documenting the public slander, etc. that I think is definitely witness tampering.

    I’m not offering Cohen legal advice. No one is apparently. How can you be positive about anything with respect to Cohen? Did he personally tell you this or have his adviser confirm that Cohen will never take legal advice from me – particularly given the fact that I am not offering it. I hope he ends up in prison – how’s that? He committed what I was told is criminal tax fraud and detroyed my life. I’m positive of that. So are others and they think it’s sick, twisted, and unconscionable. Hopefully he hasn’t altered evidence. He’s certainly done everything else humanly possible in his attempts to cover up his criminal conduct. That is and will always be my personal opinion.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
    OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?

    There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.

  273. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, I don’t decide on topics or subjects. I’m merely documenting all the slander, defamation, libel and the great attention to Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s murder trial, and the destruction of my life – by absolute strangers who seem dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential government witness or any type of witness in the matters we are “discussing.”

    Kelley Lynch

  274. Kelley Lynch Says:

    By the way, Green, accusing me of altering documents is something you are going to now have to prove.

    Kelley Lynch

  275. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Cohen is going to say I stole documents? He and his lawyer are well aware that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff has been copied in on my emails – documenting the destruction of my life since reporting his tax fraud I was told is criminal – since 2005. They are aware that evidence was sent to the IRS, State of Kentucky, and others. They have been advised to obtain this evidence from the IRS. They are aware that Boies Schiller was in possession of three boxes of evidence. I permitted them to review that evidence and assume they have kept copies. After Cohen’s lawyer issues a subpoena to the IRS we can discuss which documents – specifically – were altered. Providing the IRS with evidence of criminal tax fraud is not “theft” but it sounds like Kory logic. Anyway, Cohen should keep Kory. The altered document argument should prove fascinating.

    Kelley Lynch

    Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.

  276. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I think an obvious question will be: how do you know what Cohen’s lawyer will argue and that he will argue that the documents were stolen and altered. I see the “tax jock” is thinking out the defense.

    Kelley Lynch

  277. Kelley Lynch Says:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:57:45 AM
    Subject: Re: The Tax Jock’s Defense: She Altered All The Documents … Including Those With All The Advisers

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Ok. Let’s “pretend” there’s criminal tax fraud with respect to Cohen. Why not? This is so insane.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Let’s pretend there was criminal tax fraud

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:54:30 AM
    Subject: The Tax Jock’s Defense: She Altered All The Documents … Including Those With All The Advisers

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:46 am
    I think an obvious question will be: how do you know what Cohen’s lawyer will argue and that he will argue that the documents were stolen and altered. I see the “tax jock” is thinking out the defense.

    Kelley Lynch

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:52:06 AM
    Subject: Re: What Legal Advice?

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:43 am
    Cohen is going to say I stole documents? He and his lawyer are well aware that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff has been copied in on my emails – documenting the destruction of my life since reporting his tax fraud I was told is criminal – since 2005. They are aware that evidence was sent to the IRS, State of Kentucky, and others. They have been advised to obtain this evidence from the IRS. They are aware that Boies Schiller was in possession of three boxes of evidence. I permitted them to review that evidence and assume they have kept copies. After Cohen’s lawyer issues a subpoena to the IRS we can discuss which documents – specifically – were altered. Providing the IRS with evidence of criminal tax fraud is not “theft” but it sounds like Kory logic. Anyway, Cohen should keep Kory. The altered document argument should prove fascinating.

    Kelley Lynch

    Cohen’s attorney will argue all the “precious evidence” you had sitting in storage units is really nothing more than documents you stole and altered. And every judge will agree. Yet you, foolishly, believe Cohen committed RICO violations.

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:44:56 AM
    Subject: Re: What Legal Advice?

    From: Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:36 am
    By the way, Green, accusing me of altering documents is something you are going to now have to prove.

    Kelley Lynch Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:43:52 AM
    Subject: What Legal Advice?

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:35 am
    For the record, I don’t decide on topics or subjects. I’m merely documenting all the slander, defamation, libel and the great attention to Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s murder trial, and the destruction of my life – by absolute strangers who seem dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential government witness or any type of witness in the matters we are “discussing.”

    Kelley Lynch

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:39:34 AM
    Subject: The Altered Documents Argument Should Be Good

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:31 am
    Green, go prepare your Thanksgiving dinner and sign off as you advised me you were doing. I’m merely documenting the public slander, etc. that I think is definitely witness tampering.

    I’m not offering Cohen legal advice. No one is apparently. How can you be positive about anything with respect to Cohen? Did he personally tell you this or have his adviser confirm that Cohen will never take legal advice from me – particularly given the fact that I am not offering it. I hope he ends up in prison – how’s that? He committed what I was told is criminal tax fraud and detroyed my life. I’m positive of that. So are others and they think it’s sick, twisted, and unconscionable. Hopefully he hasn’t altered evidence. He’s certainly done everything else humanly possible in his attempts to cover up his criminal conduct. That is and will always be my personal opinion.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
    OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?

    There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:35:38 AM
    Subject:

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:16 am
    Well, Kelley, Spector’s forensic science was laughable. Neither jury bought into it. It really is time for you to let go of PS1. It was a hung jury—and Spector remained free for an extra year. It’s outrageous of you to speculate that the jurors from either trial (specifically juror #9 from PS1) were perusing the internet while serving jury duty. If you had the tiniest speck of eveidence to prove that true, you would have posted it on some website—you wouldn’t be able to help yourself.

    Make no mistake, I have neither slandered or trashed you. Your actions speak for themselves.

    You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:19 am
    Green, I’m not having a “cop” argument with you. That’s correct – I’m not a junkie-addict expert. Never claimed to be. Don’t like to be around them. I’ve noticed they can become monsters and don’t think correctly. The DEA may be experts on junkies and addicts though.

    If a cop approaches me with a flashlight he better be on the phone with his lawyer. I view this as a very serious threat and will bring this to the attention of Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury. Corrupt law enforcement is all over this story. In any event, I don’t do drugs so the cops will have trouble setting me up.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
    Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 am
    OK, please elaborate on the following: why does Kelley Lynch, and Kelley Lynch alone get to decide when discussion on a topic/subject concludes?

    There’s not a lot of things in life of which I’m positive; however, I’m positive Cohen will never take legal advice from you.

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 5:26 am
    Green, you don’t have any “corrupt cops” on your payroll that would like to use a “flashlight” on me, do you?

    I don’t think Mr. Spector’s forensic science was laughable and that’s why Jackson had to attack the scientists personally. No one believes five expert forensic scientists lied. We don’t know what the verdict would have been. Fidler’s jury instructions essentially juror tampered and changed their minds. I can speculate about anything I want. I think Juror #9 was communicating with Alan Jackson and concluded that based on the speed with which he connected with him immediately following the trial. Paul Huebl, an investigator who attended the trial, thought Juror #9 was on Sprocket’s Blog. Please see his Blog for further details. Phil Spector has extraordinary lawyers and investigators. I have no doubt that he will investigate whether the jurors were perusing the internet. He couldn’t ignore this possibility.

    Make no mistake – you have slandered me and your words are now public and will be used in a court of law. Assume anything you want to the contrary. Your interest in Cohen’s tax fraud, Phillip’s trial, and me comes across loud and clear and seems to indicate “motive.” Motive to undermine me as a potential government witness or any type of witness at all.

    You’re on the internet. What is this – do as I say, not as I do?

    I think we’ll leave the gratuitous Thanksgiving garbage as it is – preposterous after what you have attempted to do to me.

    Kelley Lynch

    You need to get a hobby, Kelley. It’s late and your starting to bore me with your continued repetition. I’m having 24 guests for Thanksgiving holiday and the first will arrive within 12 hours; therefore, I’m off. I do hope you and yours have a good holiday.

  278. Kelley Lynch Says:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; welcomingflowers@yahoo.com; 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com; bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:59:26 AM
    Subject: Cohen and Kory Have Been Advised To Subpoena All Evidence From The IRS

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    I believe I have been clear about this.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  279. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Fortunately, the documents are largely supported by the corporate indexes. Unfortunately, for Mr. Illiterate they are not “altered.”

    Kelley Lynch

  280. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Ms. Lynch
    Leonard Cohen is an entertainer, when we enter a site on the internet to read a review of an entertainer, we do not expect to read some crazy lunatic crap about that person written by a disgruntled former employer, “lover” or whatever.
    You write inappropriate stuff in inappropriate places on the web, you spill out all your private grievances including your financial problems, various sexual fantasies, your homeless situation, your children’s involvement in your pathetic situation, your children’s and sibling’s names, your friendship with a convicted killer, you write horrible, cruel peronal things about the entertainer in question and his family, and then you get furious when readers and bloggers disagree with you and argues with your craziness, accuses us of being on drugs and having “motives for disputing your accusations because (your words) “Why should strangers be interested in Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud and Phil Spector’s murder trial”. Most of us are not interested, but you barge in on places where you have no bussiness with your nonsense.
    What did you expect Ms. Lynch? That people who read your rantings will respond with “Oh thank you so much Ms. Lynch for enlightening us and telling us the truth about Leonard Cohen, you sound so credible and sane and we absolutely believe that you have been victimized by this horrible man, and yes it really does sound like Phil Spector is innocent and it is probably Leonard Cohens fault that he is rotting in jail, and yes it is absolutely Leonard Cohen fault that you live in a homeless shelter and that your son lost his finger. Let us all join you in your effort to get this man arrested and destroy his life the way he has destroyed yours”
    Well it should have entered your mind by now that that will NEVER happend, you will NEVER get anybody to “see it your way, you will never succeed in what you call “correcting slander and lies and undermining your credibility” by lying and slandering others.
    Whatever deserved or undeserved, the fact is that you lost your job, your house, your money and the lifestyle you had become accustomed to, but you know what? The same thing has happend to a lot of other people all over the world in the last few years. People cope with it in different ways, but most sane and normal people will start to rebuild their lives and go on. Not Kelley Lynch, she decided five years ago that she was going to dedicate the rest of her life to being a victim, to just let herself go to the dogs (and bring her family down with her) and blame everybody else for her missery.
    I believe the internet has several support groups and blogs for fired or displaced managers. You should check them out, they will be more suitable for you than entertainment blogs and you may find more sympathy and understanding there.
    Susanne

  281. Susanne Walsh Says:

    To Phawker, Sidney, Kelly Green, “Blogonaut”
    My best wishes for a Happy Thanksgiving.
    Susanne

  282. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, you are a sad and pathetic joke. You contradict yourself over and over and over again. You write the same words every time you post and not one person has ever responded to support you. Doesn’t that tell you something? The only responses you get are from people who see through your lies, slander and libel and confront you on your own criminal behavior. You don’t have any evidence about anything. If you did, you would already have been to court and had your trial. Five years of public slander and libel have not gotten you one iota of retribution. Five years of “poor me”; five years of being obsessed with Leonard Cohen; five years of wasting every single day, all day, on web-sites making threats, and besieging others with unwanted emails; and five years of making a fool of yourself. Now you have involved your son by announcing that all your so-called evidence is being stored in his storage unit. Real nice, Kelley. What kind of mother would incriminate her own son? An abusive one would; a mother who does not love her son would. What a waste of flesh you are, Kelley Lynch. You can’t go any lower than this. Shame on you Kelley Lynch. Shame on you.

  283. Sydney Says:

    Thanks, Susanne. Happy Thanksgiving to you also. I know what I’d be most thankful for, but that’s not going to happen.

  284. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yes Sidney I know, me too

  285. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh and Sydney, your Thanksgiving greetings to one another are nauseatingly touching – particularly in the context of a murder trial set up, criminal tax fraud, and the destruction of my life. That’s right, Sydney, I write the same words over and over – and, I will point out again, am merely correcting all of the lies on this Blog – and others. How could a stranger see through anything particularly when they have not reviewed the evidence in what I am now referring to as the “Leonard Cohen Criminal Tax Fraud Matter.” I haven’t committed any crimes but do wonder why Cohen hasn’t been arrested and prosecuted for his obvious crimes. That would include – criminal tax fraud (that was confirmed by my professional advisers), perjury, theft, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, wiitness intimidation, witness retaliation, fraud, intentional torts, and it goes on and on – from my perspective. As I like to say – he’s one hell of a “folksinger.’ I’m not obsessed with Cohen. I could care less about Cohen as I have said repeatedly. What I am focused on are his actions – visa vis me and my family members – including children. I think there’s ample evidence, right here on this Blog, that I have been besieged – by strangers keenly interested in Phil Spector’s matter, Cohen’s tax fraud matter, and – apparently – witness tampering with a potential government witness and seeing that the IRS is potentially laughed out of Court. I think people have every right to insult the IRS but I do not think they have a right to undermine or obstruct a potential criminal prosecution. There is nothing funny about that – particularly after what has gone on here.

    Just because you just learned that there “was” evidence in Rutger’s storage space does not mean that this hasn’t been addressed for a number of years publicly. Agent Sopko-Treasury and Agent Tejeda-IRS are well aware of this. The IRS is well aware of this. I brought it to the attention of Phil Spector and his legal team – after all, it appears that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phillip’s grand jury and he now has a “pattern” of perjury, obstruction of justice, etc., from what I can tell. In fact, if he merely “lied” to the detectives I met at his house that is obstruction of justice in a murder trial and no small matter. But that’s not the case if Mick Brown was correct when he emailed me that Cohen testified in Phil Spector’s grand jury. He changed his story – unless the District Attorney was attempting to prove that the stories about Phillip were good rock ‘n roll comments/stories – which they were. Many, many people have made careers and money using Phil Spector and the de riguer “gun” story. Fortunately, Marky Ramone corrected the fabricated and embellished stories about Phillip and rightly pointed out that George Brand would have had the gun as he would have served as Phillip’s body guard. The same would be true for Jay Romaine, former LAPD Homicide Detective, who apparently (according to Bill Pavelic) could have testified that the gun was not Phil Spector’s.

    I am reviewing the evidence now so Rutger is no longer involved with the situation. If anyone wants to subpoena it they should contact the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. I have also mailed evidence to the IRS Commissoiner’s Staff and Agent Sopko and her partner confirmed that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff received what I mailed them and were reviewing my emails. Apparently a number of people are “reading” them. I’m assuming they are not illiterate and I am assuming that Cohen’s defense will be that he is illiterate. I’ve also included Agent Tejeda’s phone number. For all those interested in any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen for his tax fraud (that I was told is criminal) please contact Agent Tejeda directly.

    Internal Revenue Service
    1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20224

    Agent Luis Tejeda
    300 N. Los Angeles Street
    MS 4040
    Los Angeles, CA 90012
    (213) 576-3797

    My son has now been incriminated because he stored documents for me – with everyone’s knowledge, awareness, and understanding. I believe Cohen’s legal advisers are well aware of this also and they have absolutely been told that they should subpoena all evidence from the IRS.

    Sydney, head back over to Blogonaut’s Phil Spector Appeal Watch and post some more nonsense there.

    Kelley Lynch

    Sydney Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 11:56 am
    Kelley, you are a sad and pathetic joke. You contradict yourself over and over and over again. You write the same words every time you post and not one person has ever responded to support you. Doesn’t that tell you something? The only responses you get are from people who see through your lies, slander and libel and confront you on your own criminal behavior. You don’t have any evidence about anything. If you did, you would already have been to court and had your trial. Five years of public slander and libel have not gotten you one iota of retribution. Five years of “poor me”; five years of being obsessed with Leonard Cohen; five years of wasting every single day, all day, on web-sites making threats, and besieging others with unwanted emails; and five years of making a fool of yourself. Now you have involved your son by announcing that all your so-called evidence is being stored in his storage unit. Real nice, Kelley. What kind of mother would incriminate her own son? An abusive one would; a mother who does not love her son would. What a waste of flesh you are, Kelley Lynch. You can’t go any lower than this. Shame on you Kelley Lynch. Shame on you.

  286. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Re: Kelley Lynch’s admission that Cohen’s corporate “indexes” are stored in Lynch’s son Rutger Penick’s storage room

    Prior to Kelley Lynch’s eviction from her Los Angeles home, Cohen’s attorneys served Lynch with a COURT ORDER commanding Lynch to turn over to Cohen all of Cohen’s corporate books and records.

    The Los Angeles police did the actual searching and box after box of Leonard Cohen’s property was recovered from Lynch’s home—including Cohen’s passport. (The home was so unkempt with and unsanitary the police had to wear rubber gloves to search.)

    Lynch was very angry and hostile, screaming that the many boxes recovered were “evidence”.

    If in fact Kelley Lynch (as seh admits here) failed to turn over to Cohen all of the books and records pertaining to Cohen’s business affairs, Kelley Lynch is in violation of yet another court order—and so is Rutger Penick if he is concealing those records for her.

    It would appear that Kelley Lynch has once again opened her mouth and inserted her foot.

    PS Happy Thanks Giving to all.

  287. Sydney Says:

    And she just digs herself in deeper and deeper and deeper. You’re right, Blogonaut, this has become funny. She has gotten so bizarre that all one can do is laugh. I’ve never encountered someone so hell-bent on self-destruction before. Reason and logic are so foreign to her, she can’t see the damage she’s doing to herself. Sooner or later this will end up in court (probably at a sanity hearing) and then there will be concrete proof of all her lies, slander and libel. In the meantime, Happy Thanksgiving Blogonaut.

    Happy Thanksgiving to you too, Kelley. You really should look around yourself and see if there is anything left of your life to be thankful for.

  288. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Leonard Cohen’s an entertainer? That’s rich. I passed up a first class trip to Paris just to avoid watching him play. Of course, he couldn’t stop talking about all the dignitaries that came to see him. The best thing to do at a Leonard Cohen concert, as Peter Lubin – Giant Merchandising, and I discussed was to go out to dinner. Which is precisely what we did.

    Walsh, look at the heading on this Blog thread. It is not dedicated to Cohen’s “entertainment” and there has been nothing entertaining about the targeting of my family and destruction of my life. This Blog’s thread is entitled “Leonard Cohen Is Not A Great Man.” Therefore, my comments are utterly in context and appropriate.

    I was not Cohen’s employee. And I certainly was not this creep’s lover. I can assure you that I don’t have sexual fantasies about men like “Pat Dixon” who I view as a criminal that helped set Phil Spector up. Are we clear about that? Blogonaut-Gianelli may have sexual fantasies about Dixon and he may want to hang around with him and other prosecutors but I would rather die personally. If Pat Dixon believes I have sexual fantasies about him then I have successfully proven that Pat Dixon is delusional and deranged – and really creepy and nasty.

    Excuse me for raising the “homeless” issue. Had Cohen paid me what he owed me and not stolen millions from me (“the intellectual property”) I wouldn’t have to bore you with my “homeless” tales. If this is all so monotonous and tedious for you, Walsh, why are you so obsessed and fixated on me. I noticed you were on my Blog twice already this morning. Perhaps you feel like you are a celebrity and this is your moment to shine.

    Cohen’s lawyer filed a Declaration in my son’s custody matter. Cohen targeted Rutger and my parents. Cohen should be held accountable for his actions – including his tax fraud that I was TOLD is criminal which may explain why the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and the FBI are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life. Nothing else would explain that. I have no friends or acquaintances at these agencies and I am certain there are intelligent people who know how to ask someone they feel is behaving frivolously or inappropriately to cease and desist – that would include Agent Sopko who is still copied in and has not (as Joff Belark wrote me) advised me to stop writing her. Any logical and/or rational person can conclude that there will probably be a federal criminal prosecution.

    I have not accused you of being on drugs. Do not attempt to twist my words. I asked you if you hit the crack pipe and everytime I read your comments and other comments – specifically the insanity with Gianelli-Blogonaut here and via emails to me yesterday – I am wondering if he, you, and others are unstable and/or on drugs. If not, this is a game of witness tampering and it is deadly serious and shameless. Blogonaut-Gianelli (who, based on his postings from Blogonaut vs. Gianelli, appears to be “schizophrenic) appears to be baiting and taunting the IRS, Department of Justice, and others. I continue to believe that he should be investigated and that is final. His communications with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson absolutely demand an investigation and their computers should be seized – in order to confirm how extensively they were communicating and whether or not Gianelli-Blogonaut did indeed find a sympathetic ear with Jackson by intentionally trashing me, slandering me, and attempting to undermine me as a potential prominent government witness. Jackson, a government prosecutor, should understand “witness tampering” better than anyone but he’s not involved with the law. He has engaged in a set up of an innocent man and I want to know if he was involved in having me taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Of course, I want to know who falsified the entire Killer King report. Everyone would want to know this and to say otherwise is absurd. In fact, it freaks people out and horrifies people who are not playing a game but are firmly grounded in reality and have a healthy appreciation that government corruption exists – as does police misconduct and corruption. Please take a look at the FBI’s website. They address official misconduct and the serious ramifications of corrupt officials.

    I can assure you that I didn’t barge in on this Blog. I read the article on Phawker and addressed certain issues in that article. Phawker posted my response and has clearly stated on their Blog that they respect freedom of speech. My comments to this Blog were attacked, immediately, by you – Walsh, Another Kelly Lynch Victim, more of your posts Walsh, Kelly Green, Blogonaut Law Blog, Stephen R. Gianelli (immediately threatening my son, sister, and brother-in-law with retaliation), Sydney, Kelly PLZ Face Reality (who understands I am a potential prominent government witness and seems dead set on attempting to have the IRS laughed out of Court in a deadly serious criminal tax fraud matter where countless government resources have been wasted), Kelly Give Us A Break, and Webber. Unfortunately, people cannot seem to spell my name.

    People are free to disagree with me. The only reason I am posting here or communicating with any of you is because you are liars and I am addressing your lies, slander, defamation, libel, and worse.

    You have repeatedly targeted me and you descended. It didn’t happen the other way around although I have posted my views on Phil Spector which seriously disturbs people.

    It is irrelevant to me what you believe. I believe you are either idiots or criminals. And that’s putting my personal opinions mildly. Gianelli-Blogonaut writing me “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” on this Blog and via emails is seriously disturbed activity.

    I never said it was Leonard Cohen’s fault that Phillip is rotting in prison – innocent. I said that if Mick Brown/UK Telegraph told me the truth when he wrote and said Cohen testified in Phillip’s grand jury that it’s probably perjury. He did, after all, tell the detectives (and me for approximately 20 years) that his comments were good rock ‘n roll comments and he hated his vocals. Cohen didn’t taser Phillip a number of times and he is not the District Attorney with the power, resources, and motive to “nail” an innocent celebrity. It’s an LA Sport.

    My son’s friends think Rutger lost his fingers because of the situation we found ourselves in. He would have been in college. Cohen and Lindsey owe me a tremendous amount of money and I personally hold them responsible for this. They can think what they like. I know them and they are both con artists and liars.

    You, Walsh, do not speak for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Treasury and, therefore, you cannot say whether or not Cohen will be prosecuted. It is preposterous and absurd to think otherwise. Everyone I talk to thinks Cohen should be prosecuted and Phil Spector’s innocent but please think otherwise if you so choose. I don’t just call this correcting lies and slander. That is what I’m doing. I am not interested in communicating with a bunch of maniacs for fun.

    I didn’t hvae to lose my house, lifestyle or – most importantly – custody of my son. All I had to do was accept Cohen’s offer of 50% community property (please keep in mind that Dale Burgess witnessed this offer and asked me to inform the IRS and Treasury that he will testify to that fact … I called him immediately after the Treasury agents left because we discussed this) – presumably to lie and say Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. A preposterous, absurd, ridiculous, and delusional position. I am also convinced there may be insurance fraud or an attempt to defraud an insurance company here. Sure, Walsh: a sane person whose life has been targeted and whose children’s lives were destroyed and who were targeted would just ignore this and light a joint and go on their merry delusoinal way.

    I decided in the fall of 2004 that I was going to pay all the taxes Dale Burgess told me I owed and report Cohen’s tax fraud that I was TOLD is criminal to the IRS. The moment my lawyer’s advised me that they wanted to figure in a settlement amount for my “exposure” to criminal tax fraud was the moment I realized that not only was this criminal there appeared to be some type of plan and or people had conspired to keep this from coming to the attention of the IRS. After all, Boies Scihller and others advised me that only 1% of these types of situations are brought to the attention of the IRS. I understand why and so do others – most people have advised me that I should have taken the millions I was offered, made a deal, and lived my comfortable existence with my wonderful children. Cohen, Lindsey, and others had different plans for me – including, according to Neal Greenberg’s lawsuit in Denver, conspiring to have me falsely arrested. That refers to the SWAT/Killer King incident and that, as I’ve stated, relates to Phil Spector. Obviously, this will be a key issue for Mr. Spector but one step at a time. He has the set up to deal with first and probably has to address bond. Clearly he’s not dangerous and his neighbor, who felt he was set up, is sad that Mr. Spector is in prison and not producing music as he should be. Phil Spector should be a free man. Period.

    I can assure you that I’m not “blaming” everybody for my misery and that’s a gratuitious remark – as are so many of the comments here.

    I believe I have consulted with a criminal attorney who I am keeping closely apprised of everything that is unfolding. He is a RICO expert and a litigator and that is precisely what I need.

    I can assure you that I’m not looking for sympathy here and that’s quite a twisted point of view. I have stated, for the record, that I am correcting misinformation, lies, slander, fraudulent allegatoins, etc. – and that would include the allegation raised last night that I altered documents. That will have to be proven in a court of law now. To think otherwise is foolish and truly sophomoric.

    Kelley Lynch

    “That means no matter what Cohen did or did not say to a reporter, or what you told the IRS, or attached to your motion to reconsider the Colorado restraining order you agreed to, or post on your psycho blog or claim in your nut-job emails, Cohen’s $7.9 million judgment and all factual findings that underpin it are conclusive, binding and legally deemed to be true.”

    “Nor can Cohen ever be prosecuted using your testimony because you have tainted yourself with a paper trail to law enforcement of hundreds of demonstrably false complaints that others—not just Cohen—are allegedly constantly committing federal crimes with you as the “victim”. The IRS would be laughed out of court in any case premised in any way on your testimony or where you figured as a prominent government witness.”

    Quotations posted by Kelly PLZ Face Reality

  289. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut/Gianelli, for a lawyer you certainly do not pay attention to details. The corporate indexes were emailed to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff in 2005. They were filed as attachments to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s garbage attempt to silence me. I have stated, very clearly, that I am now reviewing the documents and there is no need to discuss where I previously stored them. Cohen had the Sheriff’s Department invade my house and the Document Request that I declined to answer (instead choosing to inform the IRS Commissioner’s Staff that I would send everything to them) addressed documents relating to Cohen’s numerous social security numbers, green card insanity, off-shore accounts, gifts to Dominique Issermann from the off-shore accounts. I never heard from Cohen after the Sheriff’s invasion that Raoul Felder told me was probably illegal – with respect to documents so this is obviously a moot point. Cohen can and should contact the IRS Commissioner’s Staff if he and/or his legal team want to review what I’ve sent them. My email accounts have been targeted and shut down so I cannot even say, with any degree of certainty, what the IRS may now be reviewing. I know the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading certain documents but I’m not sure I can say that they were reviewing evidence with an eye towards a federal criminal prosecution. Maybe they’re just bored and need something to read. That’s your position, right?

    The Los Angeles police did not search my house and I do not recall letters from Bob Dylan as has been publicly stated on the internet. Bob Dylan should personally address that matter. The Sheriff’s Department seized documents – including mine relating to Traditional Holdings, LLC, Blue Mist Touring Company, etc. and hopefully they have proper legal representation – particularly as Raoul Felder, an excellent attorney, felt the search and seizure was probably “illegal.” The police did not wear rubber gloves to search and Sergeant Fernandez should speak for himself. Have you been in touch with him? I did ask him if the State of California was assisting Cohen with his tax fraud. I suppose if you think a “flood” is unkempt then there was a section of my home that flooded and I did have to move papers/evidence (for the IRS). It was not unsanitary. They also were not, as Fernandez publicly informed me, on private property.

    Actually, for the first time in my life I called someone a “cunt.” That someone is Michelle Rice who Chad Knaak thought was attempting to intimidate me. Chad didn’t think it worked. He witnesed the situation. I also called Agent Betzer/IRS to explain what was going on – as I did previously and following that. I don’t recall screaming. I thought Fernandez was a shameless madman who was upsetting my son and other teenagers – including Katie whose Mother had just been “murdered.” Real nice job. Someone’s got to do it. There’s always some shameless thug willing to intimidate innocent people so the system works well for the criminals. Ultimately, Fernandez advised me that he didn’t see the “gigalo” Cohen accused me of having.

    I failed to turn over nothing. The Sheriff’s Department searched my house and they took what they felt belonged to Cohen. Cohen never followed up to say anything else was missing and I own 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC, 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., and was illegally “given” 99.5% of LC Investments, LLC. Cohen, through Greenberg, Glusker, was given copies of the Traditional Holdings, LLC and Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. corporate books and the original LC Investments, LLC corporate books. I didn’t pay my lawyers to index the documents for Cohen but I see that the greedy illterate folksinger from hell still hates legal fees.

    I am noting your allegation about Rutger. Nothing was concealed and if you think I won’t address this in court, and attempt to have you disbarred, you truly are as deranged and unstable as I think you are. Your lunacy yesterday speaks for itself.

    Au contrare, Blogonaut-Gianelli, it is you who have backed yourself into a legal positoin that I feel you will never recover from. You are clearly witness tampering, all over the Cohen matter and defending him and you did state publicly that you were in touch with his advisers, intent on lying about me and slandering me, undermining my credibility as a witness, all over Phil Spector’s matter, and were communicating – at least once – with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson which I can assure you Phil Spector is taking seriously. You’re a lawyer, right. Do you actually believe that Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan aren’t interested in your lies to the FBI, call to Investigator William Frayeh about his remark that Pat Dixon was “good looking,” attempts to have LAPD and Boulder PD target me again, intimidation and threats with respect to my son Rutger (who David Moorhead thought was a “material witness” for Phil Spector), and – most importantly – your communication or communications with Alan Jackson. Investigator Frayeh did advise me that he thought you found a sympathetic ear with Jackson – as did I.

    Don’t drink too much wine. It might make you sloppy. You don’t pay attention to detail in any event and your arrogance prevents you from seeing your glaring crimes. These are my personal, unshakeable positions and thoughts. I am also convinced that you should be charged, arrested, and prosecuted for the reasons I have previously stated. Call Agent Wynar/FBI and quote me. I’ve already let him know how I feel.

    Kelley Lynch

  290. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, there is nothing funny about this situation. Blogonaut-Gianelli’s emails to me yesterday were forwarded to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – as were the comments on this Blog which include threats (veiled and not so veiled) against me and my son who is a witness. There is nothing bizarre about me. And now that I understand, and it has been clearly set forth on this Blog, that people are having fun tampering with a potential “prominent government witness” and attempting to undermine any pending IRS prosecution of Cohen and others, I no longer have to question motive. It’s been clearly stated.

    I will end up in court and it will not be at a sanity hearing. Gianelli-Blogonaut, after yesterday’s postings and emails to me, might want to seek help for himself.

    This Blog contains concrete proof and evidence of all of your lies, slander, and libel. That’s why I am here correcting it and documenting it.

    I have plenty to be thankful. This year I’ll give thanks for the fact that I will never have to be in the presence of Leonard Cohen or Steven Clark Lindsey again in my lifetime. If we’re in court together I will ask the court to separate us based on what they have done to my life, my children’s lives, and my parent’s lives. I will also give thanks for the fact that Rutger is a wonderful young man and supportive – who has been through an unconscionable ordeal, lost his fingers, and has risen to the challenge of moving on with his life – while being threatened and retaliated against because he is absolutely a witness.

    Kelley Lynch

  291. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Ha! You never cease to amaze and to amuse us Kelley Lynch.

    You just posted (above), just hours ago, that the corporate indexes were in your son’s storage.

    We were simply pointing out that if that is true you are in violation of the court order served on you at your Los Angeles residence. and as you well know, the Los Angeles Superior Court judgment that Cohen obtained against you in May of 2005 expressly finds that you have no equitable ownership interest in any of the Cohen related entities you reference. This judgment was characterized in 2008 by a Colorado federal court judge as a “final and binding” adjudication of Cohen’s exclusive ownership of those entities and that any interest that you had was simply to hold Cohen’s interest as a “trustee”.

    And no, Ms. Lynch, we do not mean “trustee” in the formal sense, but in the sense that anyone who holds property as the agent of another is a “trustee”.

    I realize that you disagree with these findings and the money judgment against you. However, that case has been finally adjudicated, and from a legal standpoint final and binding on you.

    BTW, Raoul Felder is a divorce lawyer, and in any event off the cuff opinions of attorneys that you talked to in passing (which you love to twist to suit your purposes) is hardly a definitive legal opinion.

    Last, stating opinions on a public bulletin board concerning a discussion you publicly initiated and obviously relish is not federal crime, and none of the federal law enforcement authorities you reference care a wit about your ridiculous accusations of “witness tampering”, “obstruction of justice” and “cyber-terrorism” that you serially spew forth against all who post opinions different than yours. We know, we have talked to two of them, including your Agent Sopko.

  292. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, you’re not threatening and attempting to intimidate Rutger because Steven Clark Lindsey asked him to go into Kory’s office and sign documents transferring my house to Cohen/Kory, are you? Since you’re a lawyer you have to admit that Phil Spector and his legal team are interested in this situation. After all, as this conversation was taking place I was being taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. I know you like to avoid this part of the story – and everything that is relevant, factual, and true. That is precisely why I am convinced that you are willfully and gleefully witness tampering, etc., lying to the FBI, and attempting to sabatoge a possible pending federal criminal prosecution of Cohen for his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. As you yourself wrote yesterday – this might annoy the IRS who might, in turn, prosecute you and others for what you are engaged in. That confirms that it is intentional.

    Kelley Lynch

  293. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    I know you are gleefully enjoying yourself – witness tampering, lying about me, slandering me, attempting to undermine a potential “prominent government witness,” lying to Agent Wynar-FBI, attempting to determine – through Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko – if there actually is a federal prosecution against Cohen pending, attempting to intimidate and threaten my son, and – obviously – attempting to sabatoge any pending IRS matter. I’ve noted, for the record, your gleeful, psychotic posts and emails to me from yesterday.

    Show me the quote where I said the corporate indexes were in my son’s storage and I’ll concede the point. The corporate indexes are attached to my Motion to Quash Cohen’s garbage attempt to silence me in Boulder, Colorado and I brought this to Joff Belark and your attention prior to the appearance of the lie disguised as an article was “published” on your Blog – with the intent to slander me and undermine my character (no doubt as a “witness”).

    Why are you pointing this out to me? Point it out to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. You have their email and have contacted Agent Sopko personally – apparently to advise her that I’m spamming her which she has not advised me. Cohen perjured himself and I have stated very clearly my legal position. I am also consulting with a criminal attorney and litigator and will follow his legal advice – not yours particularly as I personally am convinced that you are engaged in criminal conduct and your motive is overwhelmingly obvious. I wasn’t a trustee so it would be impossible for me to hold anything as a trustee. Pesky detail, I know. In any event, I have asked the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the State of Kentucky for their Opinions on these and other issues and have absolutely no interest, whatsoever, in your opinion. Not one other attorney, and I’ve spoken with great attorneys, have advised me that Cohen’s default judgment was binding. They were, however, extremely interested in the jurisdiction, perjury, fact that I was not served, and the fraud. Perjury and fraud are binding on the perpetrator. In this instance, and probably Phil Spector’s grand jury, that would be Leonard Cohen – the folksinger from hell.

    I didn’t talk to Raoul Felder in passing. Sergeant Fernandez witnessed that conversation and I have twisted nothing. I think Raoul Felder is actually a constitutional scholar and was friends with his brother, Doc Pomus, because of Phillip. I see you think you’re an actual lawyer but men like Raoul Felder are merely divorce lawyers. That tells me, as usual, that you are an arrogant idiot. Raoul Felder told me that the seizure of documents was probably illegal. Boies Schiller seemed to believe the same and documents were filed against Cohen to that effect. My own attorney will address that issue and you can analyze his arguments at that time.

    Witness tampering is a federal crime. I have said enough about this issue and am not interested in your excuses. I believe you have motive and I believe you are dead set on undermining me as a potential government witness and sabataging any pending IRS prosecution of Cohen. It’s very very obvious and very very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Tresaury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper? Your conversations with Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar become increasingly elaborate. How would you know what federal agencies feel? You do not speak for them – although I know you think you do.

    You’re fighting a losing battle. Just a head’s up.

    Kelley Lynch

  294. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Kelley Lynch you are not correcting any misinformation, lies, slander or fraudulent allegations etc. in your postings, you are just reinforcing your own lies, slander, misinformation and fraudulent allegations.
    There are people who spend their entire life hoping they will be multy-millionaires playing Lotteries, they have a better chance than you have in getting Leonard Cohen in and Phil Spector out of prison.
    Yes, I do check your nutty blog, just keep in mind, when it is morning in your world it is almost night in mine.

  295. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, Agent Sopko is not my own. I realize this is really a dig at Agent Sopko – even if she and Agent Wynar don’t.

    Kelley Lynch

    We know, we have talked to two of them, including your Agent Sopko.

  296. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, I can assure you that you do not speak for me. You may intuitively speak for the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan but do not speak for me or assume anything. I am correcting lies and misinformation and slander. You have not reviewed any evidence and have no idea what you are talking about. The allegations I have raised against Cohen are, unfortunately, not fraudulent. Were they – I would have taken the 50% community property and moved on with my life.

    Do I look like Dennis Riordan? Phil Spector is represented by one of the greatest appellate lawyers in this country – who, I might add, is copied in on my emails. Wouldn’t it be frivolous of Mr. Riordan to overlook what is going on here since he is defending Phil Spector. It is Dennis Riordan, at this point, who will assist Mr. Spector in being released from prison and I absolutely believe the Appeals Court should release Mr. Spector on bond promptly. I also believe they should understand this is a political matter and Mr. Spector was set up. If they don’t understand that they have no right to be on the bench.

    I know, Walsh, you’re obsessed and fixated with my story, Cohen’s tax fraud, and Phillip’s set up. You are an individual who entertains themselves with other people’s suffering. No doubt your children, if you have any, are proud of that quality. It’s shameless.

    Kelley Lynch

  297. Susanne Walsh Says:

    I will just join Blogonaut’s HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HAPPY THANKSGIVING

  298. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, would you elaborate upon your comments about Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar? They specifically told you that they felt the allegations of witness tampering and obstructoin of justice were “ridiculous” and they didn’t care about them, right? I never said posting on a public Blog/bulletin was a federal crime.

    Kelley Lynch

  299. Sydney Says:

    True or False:
    – Kelley Lynch was not Leonard Cohen’s employee;
    – Kelley Lynch posted no sexual fantasies about Bruce Cutler, Pat Dixon, etc.;
    – Leonard Cohen owes Kelley Lynch money;
    – Leonard Cohen targeted her sons and parents;
    – Kelley Lynch is a prominent government witness;
    – None of the above.

    Kelley, what “witness” are all of us tampering with? You are a witness only to your own hateful and evil life. How does Rutger’s severed finger keep him from being in college? It’s more likely he isn’t in college because his nut-case mother can’t sign for the student loans he needs due to her chronic unemployment, lack of legal address, and overall insanity.
    Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies.

  300. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelley Lynch was not Cohen’s employee. I was his personal manager and received a 1099.

    I posted no sexual fantasies, whatsoever, about Pat Dixon who I think is repulsive and refuse to discuss Bruce Cutler any longer. He is past history and if he has abandoned Phillip and decided to behave frivolously when an innocent man is rotting in prison that is a choice and decision that Bruce Cutler will have to live with.

    Leonard Cohen owes me millions. Gianelli-Blogonaut’s probably clear that the corporate indexes are filed in Bouder Municipal Court. Perhaps he can review that evidence, as Boies Schiller did, and determine that Cohen owes me millions. He will also be able to conclude that I wasn’t a trustee and – being a lawyer – will understand that perjury is criminal and not an acceptable basis for a fraudulent judgement.

    Leonard Cohen targeted me, my sons, and parents. See Robert Kory’s Declaration in my young son’s custody matter. It’s evidence of witness tampering with a minor and coercion, etc.

    Write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and ask them if I’m a prominent government witness – potentially. Only they can answer that question as it would relate to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.

    Rutger is in college and is not up for discussion. He would have been in college full time and probably out of Los Angeles. He, instead, had to find work to support himself – which is not essentially bad. That’s just not what I planned for him – prior to Cohen’s targeting and destroying our lives.

    Every word I have uttered is the truth. Head back over to Blogonaut’s Blog, Sydney, and post some more remarks about Phil Spector.

    Kelley Lynch

  301. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Sidney, my “intuition” tells me that the “reason Rutger lost his finger” is that if Kelley Lynch had been able to continue to siphon money from Cohen’s accounts, she and her cildren would still be living the “high life-style”, Rutger would be in college and not packing meat, and therefore not lost his finger. Is that so hard to understand?

  302. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, how do you know what the IRS has pending and whether or not they consider me a potential witness? Would you like to explain that?

    Kelley Lynch

  303. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, you have no intuition. You are nothing more and nothing less than a pathelogical liar who has targeted a stranger. Rutger actually lost his fingers because Whole Foods didn’t train him and the safety guard was removed. You don’t need “intuition” to tell you this. OSHA told me this – there’s probably criminal neglience involved and I can assure you that this is an incredibly horrendous situation. I think you are sadistic and sick. I didn’t siphon money from Cohen’s accounts. I will not discuss this any further and you have no evidence to support your lies. None whatsoever. I didn’t live a high lifestyle. I actually lived a relatively modest lifestyle so stop talking about things you do not know about – like me, an absolute stranger, or the reasons you intuitively believe are why Rutger lost his fingers. Rutger is in college and working. He wasn’t packing meat. You are just lying and making it up as you go along. You did get the logic that follows – if Rutger had been in college he wouldn’t have lost his fingers because he wouldn’t have been working at Whole Foods in Brentwood. I know tihs for a fact because I am his Mother and know where I planned to send him to school. I also know my son. Now back away from my son you twisted maniac.

    Kelley Lynch

  304. Sydney Says:

    Makes perfect sense to me, Susanne. And Kelley, if Rutger is not up for discussion why do you keep throwing his name around in your rants? Why did you bring your children into all this in the first place? None of this concerns your children or your parents or your sister’s family at all, except for the fact that you keep tossing their names into the fray. You are a liar. Always have been, and always will be. If any of the charges, threats and/or accusations you have made had any merit, someone somewhere would have taken action a long time ago. If you want to document all these issues, why not give us all a break and just put it in a journal. That way no one can dispute you; no one can criticize you; no one can call you out on your blatant lies and misrepresentations. You’re just another liar in the world. Nothing more.

  305. Kelley Lynch Says:

    fromKelley Lynch
    todoronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com”

    ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    susanne walsh

    dateWed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM
    subjectRe:
    mailed-bygmail.com
    Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
    hide details 11:40 AM (0 minutes ago)

    P.S. Why don’t you review the corporate indexes. You can determine that Cohen perjured himself when he said I was a trustee, has a pattern of perjury, and illegally issued me the K1s also attached to my Motion to Quash his bullshit attempts to silence me. Also, check out Dale Burgess’ fax. Imagine what the assets that are missing from the “ledger” are worth – that’s right, Jackson, millions. Let me know if you can’t figure out why Boies Schiller wanted Brian Bennett to wire me when I met with Kory. I figured it out. So did Superfon who told me the type of deal Cohen was offering me was “illegal.” I knew that and that is precisely why I asked her to have Kory fax it to me. Let me quote him – he couldn’t; it wasn’t the type of deal that can be faxed. I’ve never heard of that type of deal and I’ve been involved with countless negotiations. Walsh, Gianelli, etc. are pigs, liars, and vicious. I am convinced that the District Attorney has exposed me to these maniacs and a jury is going to see who I believe you are associated with.
    – Hide quoted text –

    On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    Jackson,

    Do you see the crowd defending Cohen? Decent people will understand the cruelty of targeting Rutger and this insanity with Walsh, Gianelli, etc.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelley Lynch
    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
    Sidney, my “intuition” tells me that the “reason Rutger lost his finger” is that if Kelley Lynch had been able to continue to siphon money from Cohen’s accounts, she and her cildren would still be living the “high life-style”, Rutger would be in college and not packing meat, and therefore not lost his finger. Is that so hard to understand?

  306. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “It’s very obvious and very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Treasury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper?”

    In so many words, yes.

    But it is also a matter of common sense that joining in an internet chat board discussion initiated by the alleged “victim” and posting opinions that her alleged civil lawsuits are not viable and the poster is not credible is not a federal crime, let alone “witness tampering”. (Nor, BTW, is giving testimony in a paternity, or any other, matter.)

    Agent Sopko also told us that a reasonable person would not find you credible so we would not be too concerned about your disparaging blog posts and your threats of criminal prosecution.

    We say “your” agent Sopko because she is the person at the Department of the Treasury that you write daily (sometimes 10 times daily) to demand the prosecution of just about everyone who annoys you on the internet.

  307. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I didn’t live a high lifestyle.”

    Excuse us, Ms. Lynch, it must have been someone else with the $70,000 balance on their Neiman Marcus account and who owned (among other luxuries) a $30,000 Hermès Birkin bag.

    And it must have been someone else who posted above as Kelley Lynch to admit to living in a $1.8 MILLION home with a pool in an exclusive Los Angeles neighborhood.

    For give us, but that fact that you believe that a $1.8 million home is not that extravagant PROVES that you were indeed living la dolce vita.

    You see, Ms. Lynch we do pay attention to “details”—and we remember them too.

  308. Kelley Lynch Says:

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:20:18 PM
    Subject: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    Agent Sopko,

    I want you to read Blogonaut-Gianelli’s public post from Phawker.com (and below). You told Gianelli-Blogonaut thta “a reasonable person would not find” me “credible” so “Blogonaut-Gianelli” should “not be too concerned about” my posts. Right, Agent Sopko? This is, no doubt, verbatim. The Treasury, according to Gianelli-Blogonaut, told him in so many words (which I would like him to repeat verbatim in quotes), that the Treasury does ont believe he is attempting to obstruct justice or witness tampering? Would you mind confirming that for me. There is nothing on Phawker’s Blog or in Gianelli-Blogonaut’s action that can be construed as “common sense.” I did not initiate a “chat room.” I responded to an article Phawker posted about Cohen where I believed I was slandered. Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh (all affiliated with Blogonaut’s garbage site) and others descended and targeted me and have lied and slandered me. I suppose you support that also, correct? I haven’t said that what Gianelli-Blogonaut is now defining as a “federal crime” is a federal crime. He is twisting the words – clearly documented on this Blog – and putting words in my mouth. I have no idea what his stupid remark about giving testimony in a paternity matter has to do with anything.

    Perhaps you would also like to explain, for me, how I could threaten criminal prosecution. Do you see me working for the IRS, DOJ, FBI and/or Treasury as a prosecutor? Am I a attorney? Then how could I threaten criminal prosecution? I have reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud and absolutely believe Gianelli-Blogonaut is willfully witness tampering, threatening my son, monitoring my actions, stalking, participating in cyber-terrorism, retaliating against witnesses, raising false allegations about me, accusing me and Rutger of things we have not done, etc.

    I have never frivolously requested an investigation into anyone who annoys me. I think Susanne Walsh is a complete lunatic and malicious woman but am convinced that she is merely a Cohen cult victim and her opinions do not interest me. Her vicious comments about Rutger prove, to me, that I am dealing with people who behave unconscionable and are capable of anything. I, do, however, think Kelly Green, Another Kelly Lynch Victim, and others on Phawker’s Blog should be investigated. Not because they annoy me. Because I believe they have motive to undermine a potential “prominent government witness” and sabatage a pending IRS criminal prosecution. I am assuming, based on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s remarks, that the Treasury is now attempting to undermine any potential IRS matter – as is Agent Wynar/FBI who seems to have told Gianelli-Blogonaut that I am a 5150 candidate and will have to testify to that on the stand and back it up with facts which isn’t going to happen.

    Kelley Lynch

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:08:44 PM
    Subject:

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
    “It’s very obvious and very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Treasury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper?”

    In so many words, yes.

    But it is also a matter of common sense that joining in an internet chat board discussion initiated by the alleged “victim” and posting opinions that her alleged civil lawsuits are not viable and the poster is not credible is not a federal crime, let alone “witness tampering”. (Nor, BTW, is giving testimony in a paternity, or any other, matter.)

    Agent Sopko also told us that a reasonable person would not find you credible so we would not be too concerned about your disparaging blog posts and your threats of criminal prosecution.

    We say “your” agent Sopko because she is the person at the Department of the Treasury that you write daily (sometimes 10 times daily) to demand the prosecution of just about everyone who annoys you on the internet.

  309. Kelley Lynch Says:

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:25:48 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Blogonaut-Gianelli is interested in my Neiman’s account. Why? Am I married to this deranged madman? I never owned a Hermes Birkin bag and I have never in my life paid anything like that for a handbag. It is an absurd and preposterous allegation and it is a lie. Of course, as usual, Gianelli-Blogonaut will never be able to prove that lie. In any event, the burden of proof is now on Gianelli-Blogonaut. This will be an impossible feat for this liar to prove.

    Actually, the Governor lived on Mandeville Canyon Road and the homes are often priced between $25-30 million. I bought my house for approximately $700,000 which was a steal. My Father and I almost single-handledly renovated the house. It was worth $1.8 million when I lost it due to various unfortunate circumstances – including the fact that the potential buyer wanted to give me $200,000 in cash (and an apartment) under the table and did not want to have a written agreement. I did not trust that type of deal although I was assured by him and Wendi Knaak that it was a valid deal. I believe I said my lifestyle was modest. My home was modest. The property values are high.

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, as always, does not pay attention to details.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
    “I didn’t live a high lifestyle.”

    Excuse us, Ms. Lynch, it must have been someone else with the $70,000 balance on their Neiman Marcus account and who owned (among other luxuries) a $30,000 Hermès Birkin bag.

    And it must have been someone else who posted above as Kelley Lynch to admit to living in a $1.8 MILLION home with a pool in an exclusive Los Angeles neighborhood.

    For give us, but that fact that you believe that a $1.8 million home is not that extravagant PROVES that you were indeed living la dolce vita.

    You see, Ms. Lynch we do pay attention to “details”—and we remember them too.

  310. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    OOOOH–You have reported us for the sixth hundredth time[?] to Agent Sopko.

    We are shaking in our boots, ooooooh!

    Ps: Kelley Lynch: You serially threaten criminal prosecution by posting and CCing your victims with threats to report their alleged “cimes” to the “feds” (aa you like o put it), and by posting and copying your victims with emails to Agent Sopko (and many other law enforcers) askiing that your victims be “investigated”. “arrested”, and “prosecued” by the United States.

  311. Kelley Lynch Says:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:32:35 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Gianelli-Blogonaut and the liars are never going to prove that I owned a $30,000 Birkin bag or a $1,000 Birkin bag for that matter. They must have me confused with Paris Hilton or Anjani Thomas. I suppose Gianelli-Blogonaut is confusing this with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg that she spent $30,000 at Neiman Marcus. She thought that’s where this garbage gossip arose from.

    My house was modest and guess who is a witness to that fact? Phil Spector. Phillip, however, happened to like my house very very much although it certainly wasn’t as large and/or as glamorous and my neighbors – Susan Lord and Steven Segal. I closed my retirement account, paid the taxes on my IRA withdrawal, and put a downpayment on a very nice, very simple house that was Rutger, Ray and my home.

    Are they attempting to turn me into a Hollywood starlett type? I didn’t even go out and no one will ever be able to prove that I did – except for lunches with Cohen or my Mother; shopping or the doctor’s office with the children; carpooling; volunteer work; and – of course – the House of Blues and the restaurant with Harry Dean Stanton with Phillip. I also attended some Grammy parties – on official business because I do not like large events and am not particularly social. His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, Yongzin Rinpoche, Choegon Rinpoche, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, Lingtrul Rinpoche, Chagdud Rinpoche, and many other lamas would frequently visit me and oftentimes stay with me – for months at a time. Yongzin Rinpoche actually lived in my small guest house for a while. And, of course, Gesar Mukpo (my nephew through marriage to Douglas Penick – who was married to Trungpa Rinpoche’s sister-in-law regardless of what Bergman was attempting to prove in Court – that Gesar’s not my nephew) lived with me on Keniston Avenue and Mandeville Canyon.

    I’m clear about Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive, are you?

    Love,
    Kelley

  312. Kelley Lynch Says:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:39:20 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    To the IRS Commissoiner,

    Cohen did “give” Anjani Thomas her house. Of course, he bought it (and Adam Cohen’s gift house) with assets owned by Traditional Holdings, LLC that he has not – as yet – repaid with 6% interest. He also gave Anjani Thomas an $18,000 baby grand piano and an incredibly expensive garden and other things that are technically gifts – including cash. Trust me – he was well aware of gift taxes. His disdain for them was right up there with his disdain for ordinary income taxes.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  313. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Uh, Ms: Lynch: there are purchase records and other proof involved.

    Let’s just say that 1. Your Neiman Marcus account records speak for iteself and 2. You were the best accessorized person to habitually sleep on the beach in Santa Monica following the eviction from your luxury home.

    Nor (we note) do you deny owing a Birkin bag, nor is there any such thing as a Birkin bag priced under $30,000. (They never go on sale, and there is a long waiting list.)

  314. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, you’ve lied about the Birkin bag. I never owned one and never would actually. I preferred more reasonable designers – such as Michael Kors. You must have this story confused with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg she spent $30,000 at Neiman’s. My house was modest and my lifestyle was modest.

    I haven’t “reported” you to Agent Sopko. I’ve asked her to confirm and validate your comments about what she told you. I have already asked the IRS, DOJ, Tresaury, and FBI to investigate whether or not you are attempting to obstruct justice, sabatage an IRS criminal prosecution (that may be pending), witness tampering, etc. Whether they do is up to them.

    I know you think this is fun and exciting – inserting yourself into a deadly serious tax matter and Phil Spector’s set up; insulting federal agents; lying to the FBI; contacting Investigator Frayeh; etc. Your emails and posts of yesterday are evidence that you are arrogant, harassing me, and out of your mind from what I can tell.

    I cannot threaten criminal prosecution. I am not a criminal prosecutor or attorney as I’ve repeatedly stated. The “feds” should know, better than I, what is and/or is not a crime. I do not, however, refer to the parties copied in as “the feds” because I am not crass and I am not playing deadly games with them. You are not my victim. You had Joff Belark target me and he wrote one long lie that you posted as an article. No one forced you to descend onto this Blog and lie about me publicly, slander me, threaten my son, and raise fraudulent allegations. You yourself came to this Blog and, from my perspective, your sole motive is to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent goverment witness” and to sabatage any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others. That’s my opinion. I have no idea how the “United States” investigates, arrests, and prosecutes anyone. I asked the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury to investigate you. Whether or not they arrest and prosecute you, Cohen, and others remains to be seen.

    Kelley Lynch

  315. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    PS: The gifts that a husband (according to you) may have gifted to his wife, have nothing to do with your false statements published here that we have, in part, refuted, including your denial that you were living a life of luxury.

    Who cares gifts Leonard Cohen has bestowed on others. He is not the one denying la dolce vita.

  316. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, there are purchase records and I can assure you that my credit card records are none of your business or anyone else’s for that matter. There is, however, no proof that I bought a $30,000 Birkin bag because I did not.

    Let’s say that you can never subpoena my Neiman Marcus records because you don’t know me and are now, an absolute stranger, interested in my credit card records. Ok. How would you konw how I looked in Santa Monica or how I accessorized myself? I know Peter/Jacob Falconey – who impersonated a federal agent – was stalking me there and reported one incident to Santa Monica PD. The field report of that incident exists.

    I absolutely deny ever owning a Birkin bag. I just googled Birkin bag and immediately turned up three under $30,000.

    Kelley Lynch

    Hermes Birkin bag
    $2,750.00 new – eCRATER – vivelarose
    Parchemin Clemence & Gold 35cm Hermes Birkin Bag
    $15,403.70 new – eCRATER …
    Hermes Tan Gold 35CM Birkin Bag Togo Leather
    $1,350.00 new – Sacs En Ligne

    How To Buy A Birkin Bag

  317. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I cannot threaten criminal prosecution.”

    And yet you have, daily.

    And yet there are torts and crimes that are premised on private individuals threatening criminal prosecution, notably, the crime of extortion.

    By your logic, the crime of extortion does not exist. Nor does the civil right of action against an extortionist.

  318. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I have no idea what you are talking about.

    The IRS cares about gift taxes, don’t they? Has anyone else in America paid gift taxes? Then why should Leonard Cohen buy Anjani Thomas and his son houses, give them gifts of well over $11,000 a year, and gift others – including Joshu Sasaki Roshi $500,000 in stock, and not have to pay gift taxes. By the way, Kory told the holding periods were illegal and I think there is an issue with the gift of stock to the Mt. Baldy Zen Center from L.C. Stranger Music, Inc. Fortunately, I wasn’t a partner or owner on that entity and this was clearly a gift from Cohen. This is when the IRS audits began. They continued through the $1 million deposit that Cohen took as a loan and the IRS Agent was right on when he questioned Richard Westin’s evasiveness and sent Sony an unreal document request so no one is going to tell me that every IRS Agent is a McDonald’s worker or the IRS doesn’t think there are credible tax issues at hand – as they relate to Cohen. Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, understood there were. and the IRS is in receipt of those memos from Westin which include possible aggressive defenses to IRS prosecutions from what I could tell.

    I didn’t live a life of luxury. Period. You are a liar.

    Kelley Lynch

  319. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli/Blogonaut – you are a liar. I cannot threaten criminal prosecution. I have asked the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury to investigate certain issues – including whether or not you have attempted to obstruct justice, witness tampered, etc. I have been clear about this and the “discussion” is now boring. Go back and read my remarks. They are clear.

    Have I, notably, stated that there are crimes premised on private individuals – notably, “the crime of extortion.” Thanks for pointing that out. I thought Cohen and Kory engaged in extortion – and that explains Kory’s Declaration in my son’s custody matter. So does witness tampering with a minor.

    The crime of extortion exists. Save your legal bullshit for someone like Alan Jackson. I have worked for and with great attorneys – including men who have gone onto become federal judges. I have never in my life heard such garbage legal interpretations as yours in my life. You are talking to yourself. Perhaps you should phone Kory up and give him some tips. He can use them. My lawyers wrote me that he didn’t have a handle on Cohen’s tax issues and was basically afraid to even request copies – from the IRS – of the Traditional Holdings, LLC tax returns. Are you clear about that?

    Kelley Lynch

  320. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I have no idea what you are talking about.”

    We think that you do, Kelley Lynch. You have theatened to have us prosecuted hundreds of times.

    And yet, we remain AT LARGE and UNCHARGED!

    Regarding your new (after 5 years) allegation that Cohen failed to pay gift taxes when due, I might be a tad skeptical–given the large axe you have to grind.

    Besides, the two have been married for years.

  321. Kelley Lynch Says:

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko,

    Extortion does seem to be criminal. Neal Greenberg raised extortion as an issue in his “companion piece” to Cohen’s bogus lawsuit – I believe they were planned lawsuits. In any event, I am unclear on how Greenberg could raise extortion as a civil matter when, in fact, it is a criminal matter. I know this – when you’re offered 50% community property presumably to lie and say someone who committed criminal tax fraud was defrauded by his advisers (and potentially helping to implicate parties who may be innocent and deserve an opportunity to explain their actions in court) you are being asked to engage in criminal conduct. I also believe the custody matter was used as a coercive weapon meant to crush me. Cohen and Lindsey understood, all too well, precisely how close Ray and I were. And, of course, it was blackmail.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extortion

  322. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli/Blogonaut, where’s your lawsuit that you threatened me, my sister, brother-in-law, and Rutger with. I’ve already informed you that I will subpoena Agent Wynar/FBI, Agent Sopko/Tresaury, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and Cohen to the stand. Obviously Courts permit telephonic testimony. My friend just participated in a trial. She’s in Texas and the trial was in Michigan so this is common practice and I personally have participated in a telephonic hearing.

    I’ve requested investigations – including into your conduct. You pay attention to details (but lie) so you should understand this.

    How quaint – you have remained at large and uncharged. Write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko – Treasury Department. You’re copied in on my emails addressing this latest round of lies and slander. Ask them why you are at large and unchaged? Confirm for them that I think you are tampering with a potential prominent government witness and attempting to help sabatage a potential federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others. Tell them I am convinced of this.

    These allegatoins aren’t new. You haven’t been copied in on all my emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff so you don’t know what you’re talking about as usual. In fact, you don’t seem to have a real handle on any of the very real and credible issues. Anyway, I thought gift taxes weren’t relative with respect to Cohen. What’s that – Cohen’s defense? That I have an axe to grind. I reported his tax fraud that I was told is criminal, provided the IRS with evidence, and documented some of what I witnessed.

    Who has been married for years? Leonard Cohen and Anjani Thomas are not married. It will, however, be interesting to note for jurors that Cohen offered me 50% community property and yet holds himself out as a man in a relationship with Anjani Thomas. His conversations about my fictional sex life with Oliver Stone ought to drive this point home: that he was and is obsessed with me and he was and is jealous. I know this for a fact. I had to live with it for nearly 20 years.

    Kelley Lynch

    “Besides, the two have been married for years.”

  323. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “Are you clear about that?”

    What we are clear about is that until you hijacked our blog, we did not even know you existed, but when we banned you (and before we published the TRUTHFUL AND BALANCED article about you, we were require to educate ourselves about you.

    And we now know plenty—including that you are stone crazy.

    Moreover, we have not talked to EVERYONE you formerly touted as friends or protectors but we have communicated with Bruce Cutler (thinks you are a stalker), Agent Sopko (thinks you are not credible), Bill Pavelic (thinks you are a “very disturbed woman) and others.

    We did not ask for this spat, but you insisted on dragging us into your psychosis, and here we are.

  324. Sydney Says:

    ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Kelley, you are too much. I get it now. You’ve just been stringing us along all this time, telling us the most outlandish stories just to make us laugh. You’ve succeeded quite well. And to think at one time I actually felt sorry for you. And now, in your 4:55 comment, your jealousy of other people in Leonard Cohen’s life might have been better taken care of than you. And who the heck needs a $1,000 purse? Jealousy is a vicious and evil demon for a person to carry around. Poor, poor Kelley, that weight is getting too heavy, isn’t it. Poor Kelley, nobody loves her, everybody hates her, so she’s gonna eat some woooorrmms.

  325. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 13:31
    asuntoRe: I Think We’ve Put The Birkin Bag Price Issue To Rest
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 13:31 (0 minutos antes)

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Gianelli-Blogonaut’s now interested in Cohen’s gift taxes. This situation became so preposterous. You really should call Van Penick to the stand. He must have thought Cohen was a maniac after receiving calls about residence/tax issues in Canada, having sex with the 15 year old nanny (Cohen was worried about criminal prosecution – Van told me there are no statutes relating to this in Canada), Lorca Cohen’s allegations that he molested her (on Ann Diamond’s public Blog), and the insanity with the gift taxes and the U.S. tax credit for a donation of his work to the University of Toronto’s rare book library. Reeve Chudd, who wants to remain in the dark (I intend to blindside him personally …), emailed me and said he wasn’t an alchemist. It was absurd. Hopefully you’ve reviewed all my emails. Please do use any that you feel are appropriate or irrelevant should you pursue a cirminal prosecution of Cohen. Hopefully, Gianelli and others won’t be able to successfully sabatage any pending or potential prosecution although I am convinced that’s part of the goal and “motive.”

    All the best,
    Kelley

  326. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Alan Jackson Responder |Kelley Lynch para doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., STEPHEN, Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, ajackson
    mostrar detalles 13:35 (2 minutos antes)

    deKelley Lynch
    paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org

    ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 13:35
    asuntoAlan Jackson
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 13:35 (2 minutos antes)

    Here you go Jackson. See if you can follow along. I’m not the Hollywood type and can assure you and the thugs who set Phillip up that I did not live a glamorous life and didn’t have a Birkin bag. Put all your so-called investigators on it. Bennett saw my house. And has my letter from Phil Spector. It’s not yours. Take note of that point and threatening me isn’t the way to respond to a return of evidence request. Evidence of nothing because I didn’t witness Clarkson shoot herself. Phillip did and said it was devastating. Be clear about that – you have set up a man that witnessed a woman shoot herself.

    Kelley Lynch

    2009/11/25 Kelley Lynch

    Correction: Appropriate or relevant.

  327. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    What we are clear on is that KL lived in a multi-million pool house (albeit where the pool was filthy Petri-dish, and there were open and unsanitary food containers everywhere), that KL had a $30,000 Birkin bag, spent $10,000 a month at her pharmacy, had a $70,000 balance luxury department store account, received a seven figure (almost $2 M) commission from Cohen before she was foreclosed on, and led, by any objective measure a lux lifestyle.

  328. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “Gianelli-Blogonaut’s now interested in Cohen’s gift taxes.”

    Excuse us, but YOU just brought this issue up, five years after you reported Cohen to the IRS–apparently out of desperation that he might no be prosecuted per your revenge fantasies.

  329. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org

    ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 13:43
    asuntoRe: FBI
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 13:43 (0 minutos antes)

    P.S. My next door neighbors on Mandeville said they wouldn’t permit the Chief of Police on their property after the SWAT incident. The police were also on their property – endangering my neighbors as well as me, Rutger, and his friends which is outrageous.
    – Ocultar texto citado –

    2009/11/25 Kelley Lynch

    To the FBI,

    I called the Denver FBI when I was “threatened” by this thug’s colleague for simply requesting that they return my letter from Phil Spector. I have no idea what the Duty Agent that day thought was going on but I know what I heard and I was threatened with “arrest.” That is a terrorist threat and the Attorney General’s office told me – in no uncertain terms – that their threats to arrest me (she was addressing Marco) were viable. Fortunately, Rockaway Police Department seemed to understand that Marco’s conduct was criminal. His “Merry Christmas” to the Denver FBI remark was outrageous and snide, vicious, etc. He pretends he’s Julia’s assistant and is a true thug. He is apparently part of Cooley’s own office. I have no idea what the New Jersey FBI Duty Agent thought I was talking about. He could only hear every third word but was extremely professional.

    I have been threatened, on Phawker’s Blog, by Kelly Green with possible further targeting by cops with flashlights. After what I’ve gone through and Gianelli’s urging of LAPD and Boulder PD to further target me I take that very very seriously.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  330. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, Let me set the record straight – again. I did not have a pool house. I’ve already stated the amount I paid for my house. What are you now alleging? That I invested well? The pool was perfectly clean and I personally know how to shock a pool. You are a liar who have never been to my house. There is a video of my house – with the Sheriff’s Department – that I will review with my attorney but my house was well maintained and you, as usual, are a liar. Beyond that, it is evidence of nothing except your unbelievable interest in a stranger’s life.

    I have stated, for the record, that I never owned a $30,000 Birkin bag and find it repulsive that someone would spend that much on a handbag. I did not spend $10,000 a month at the pharmacy but Steven Clark Lindsey did charge approximately $2000 worth of cipro on my account after 9/11 without my permision. He frequently did this. Cohen, on the other hand, offered me $10,000 walking around money – after I refused to meet with him and hand over the corporate books prior to giving my attorneys copies and around the time Kory – on behalf of Cohen – offered me 50% community property presumably to lie to the IRS and others that he was defrauded by his advisers. Men like Alan Grubman, who personally met with Cohen about the sale of certain assets to Sony, might not appreciate being accused of defrauding Cohen. I was told Cohen was going “after” every one of his advisers. You are going to be called to the witness stand to explain who has told you so much about my personal finances and what your particular interest in my former finances is. I received approximately $1 milloin from Cohen as a commisison and, believe me, I earned every penny of that commisison. I did not, however, receive a 1099 and will view that as a gift. Cohen can pay the gift tax on that gift because his adviser, Richard Westin, was going to recharacterize the nature of certain distributions, etc., from Traditoinal Holdings, LLC. I have no idea what that means and would like the IRS’ Opinion on that matter – obviously. Let me be clear – I did not make a $2 million commisison. That is also a lie. I invested in my card company that Cohen so loved and wanted to help me with. I did not live a luxurious life. I lived a very decent life and educated my children well – in private school and by hiring tutors for my older son who was home-schooled. I also helped lesser advantaged children with tuition, camp fees, tutoring, and so forth and so on. You are and always will be a liar who has targeted me, has motive, and is a liar.

    Kelley Lynch

  331. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “I have been threatened, on Phawker’s Blog, by Kelly Green with possible further targeting by cops with flashlights.”

    HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

    You have quite an imagination KL, but blog posts in response to an on-line discussion that YOU initiated and obviously relesh is not criminal. Nor would a reasonable person reading this blog conclude that you have been “threatened”.

    BTW, how is your request to Agent Sopko several months ago to induct you into the fedral witness protection program going? Any word?

    Like, anyone would have known that you reported Cohen for “tax fraud” if you had not published that fact on then internet?

    As if you would not be protected if you really were a witness to a real prosecution (and not just a prosecution that you have CONCOCTED in your own mind)?

    HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

    ****NUT CASE ALERT ****

  332. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli- Blogonaut, there is no excuse for you. I brought it up to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department ages ago. You weren’t copied in on those emails and are not privy to all my communications with the IRS, Treasury, FBI, or DOJ. You are clearly interested in Cohen’s gift taxes. You addressed them. You just continue to lie. I brought it up as evidence that he has a pattern of intentionally defrauding the U.S. government. I am not bound to any immoral notions that he or you have about protecting criminals. What’s your point? He does or doesn’t owe gift taxes?

    Kelley Lynch

  333. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “Gianelli- Blogonaut, there is no excuse for you. I brought it up to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department ages ago.”

    And yet we roam free.

    Our point is that you are so hell bent on having your perceived enemies prosecuted that you will say anything, not to mention your mention (for the first time this week) of alleged gift tax violations smacks of desperation that the man you hate will not be prosecuted by the IRS.

    ****NUT CASE ALERT****

  334. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    ****NUT CASE ALERT****

  335. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    HaHaHaHahaaaaWhooooowhoooohahaha!

  336. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, please review Kelly Green’s remark – directly above – about cops with flashlights. She cautioned me. I brought it to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko – Treasury. Here’s the post. The federal agencies I’ve sent this post to can make their own determination as to whether or not it’s a thinly veiled threat.

    How would you know what a reasonable person would conclude?

    I didn’t ask Agent Sopko to “induct” me into the witness protection program. Dale Burgess, my former accountant who witnessed a great deal with Cohen, Kory, and others, felt I should be in the witness protection program. Director Black/Star of Hope questioned my safety. These are reasonable and intelligent people. I see it’s a game for you – as usual.

    I could care less if people would or wouldn’t have known that I reported Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal to the IRS and others. Cohen gave an interview to Brian Johnson and stated publicly what his motive was – his massive tax hit. As you know, he also stated publicly that he was not accusing me of theft.

    I suppose I should be protected. Why don’t you write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko as my safety is continually raised as a serious concern. In fact, people have been remarking that they think I’m blessed because I’m still alive. They felt that the people behind (or on) the SWAT incident or who took me to Killer King were deadly serious about causing me harm. Fortunately, I feel well protected. I am, of course, concerned about the safety of both my sons. My friend, John Barry, thought LAPD would attempt to murder me if I testified in court against them. Many people are concerned. I, personally, do not cave into terrorists.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 5:05 am
    Apparently, you don’t know as much about junkies and addicts as you profess. No, cops aren’t see-in-thedark optometrists–when a person is high and a flashlight is shined in his eyes, the whites of his eyes twitch. So if a cop approaches you will a flashlight, Kelley, don’t look up.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
    “I have been threatened, on Phawker’s Blog, by Kelly Green with possible further targeting by cops with flashlights.”

    HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

    You have quite an imagination KL, but blog posts in response to an on-line discussion that YOU initiated and obviously relesh is not criminal. Nor would a reasonable person reading this blog conclude that you have been “threatened”.

    BTW, how is your request to Agent Sopko several months ago to induct you into the fedral witness protection program going? Any word?

    Like, anyone would have known that you reported Cohen for “tax fraud” if you had not published that fact on then internet?

    As if you would not be protected if you really were a witness to a real prosecution (and not just a prosecution that you have CONCOCTED in your own mind)?

    HAHAAAAWHAHAHAHAWOOOOOHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

    ****NUT CASE ALERT ****

  337. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Ms. Lynch, we care not what you think because you are a nut case, everone you email knows you are a nut case, an no one you threaten will ever be prosecuted.

  338. Sydney Says:

    Ah, older son Rutger was home-schooled – that’s why he couldn’t get into college. Ignorance breeds ignorance. Kelley, are you aware that some of the symptoms of Alzheimer’s is repetition of comments, short term memory dysfunction, distortion of the facts and lack of time awareness. It’s been 5 years Kelley. More than enough time for all these federal and state agencies to have taken action against all the people you are going to sue and subpoena. Not one word of yours even comes close to the truth. You can twist and turn, wiggle and waggle, jump up and down and this will never change. The only reason none of these agencies have taken any action is because there is no cause to, probable or otherwise.

  339. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org

    ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:16
    asuntoRe: Gianelli-Blogonaut Is Dangerously Unstable
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 14:16 (0 minutos antes)

    To the FBI and DOJ,

    One must ask why he is so focused on me, monitoring my activity and whereabouts, threatening my son, sister, and brother-in-law, sending me obviously harassing and disturbing emails, and utterly fixated on me, Cohen’s tax fraud and Phil Spector’s set up. This is the man that Alan Jackson contacted. Did you have an opportunity to take a look at Michelle Blaine’s vile Blog. She thanked Blogonaut for targeting my email accounts and Blogs. I am not threatening Gianelli-Blogonaut. I am asking you to investigate him. This is not normal behavior and it crosses any concept of decency. He is dead set on slandering me and lying about me. I remain convinced that he is witness tampering and his motive and goal is to undermine me as a credible potential prominent government witness and to sabatage any potential and/or pending federal prosecution of Cohen. That’s probably why Investigator Frayeh thought this maniac found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson. I think that sums things up perfectly and – voila – William Frayeh is off the Spector matter. Fortunately, Investigator Frayeh saw through Gianelli-Blogonaut and informed me that he is a shady character. I think that’s true understatement.

    Agent Wynar is absolutely going to take the stand to testify about his conversations with Gianelli. I am assuming there are tape recordings of those conversations as well. I want the jury to hear precisely what unfolded and what was said. Gianelli lied to the FBI and he contacted Agent Sopko? Why? Because he is attempting to determine if Leonard Cohen will be prosecuted. It’s dead obvious if you’re paying attention to the details and have a knack for seeing through liars and their lies.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
    Ms. Lynch, we care not what you think because you are a nut case, everone you email knows you are a nut case, an no one you threaten will ever be prosecuted.

  340. Sydney Says:

    I agree, Blogonaut, she’s a nut case – through and through. I hope all the law enforcement agencies and agents she sends multiple emails to are at least getting a good belly-laugh about her. She certainly has earned it.

  341. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Actually, Sydney from Blogonaut’s Phil Spector Section, Rutger was home-schooled with tutors who were teachers at private schools in the Los Angeles area – such as Marymount, The Brentwood School, and even professors from UCLA. He received a very good education. Furthermore, his Father – Douglas Penick, graduated Princeton and is a brilliant man who assisted with Rutger’s education. Rutger is in school.

    You are now calling a perfect stranger, my son, ignorant. This proves to me that you are cruel and dead set on slandering me and Rutger. It is unconscionable conduct.

    You have raised one crucial point: I’ve been documenting the destruction of my life for five years because details (names, dates, places, incidents, etc.) are difficult to recall. I thought it would be best to have a record of everything – accurately reflecting what was happening as it happened. Thanks for pointing that out.

    Every single word I have spoken and written about these matters is the truth. Actually, I heard that Srocket of Trials & Tribulations twists all the facts in the Phil Spector matter. She’s apparently the mouthpiece for “Donna Clarkson” who seems to have money as her motive for attempting to turn her daughter’s suicide into a homicide. That’s a hell of a “concept.”

    I’ll let the federal agencies copied in on my emails know that you have publicly stated, for the record, that “The only reason none of these agencies have taken any action is because there is no cause to, probable or otherwise.” Apparently you are now their spokesperson.

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. By the way, Rutger is briliant and an unpeachable witness. I know this is disturbing.

  342. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org

    ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:24
    asuntoRe: Sydney – From Blogonaut’s Blog – Attempts To Undermine Rutger (A Material Witness)
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 14:24 (0 minutos antes)

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and Agent Sopko,

    Are you getting (at least) a “good belly-laugh” out of the destruction of my life, targeting of my family, and Sydney’s attack on my son Rutger who has been through an unconscionable ordeal?

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Sydney Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
    I agree, Blogonaut, she’s a nut case – through and through. I hope all the law enforcement agencies and agents she sends multiple emails to are at least getting a good belly-laugh about her. She certainly has earned it.

  343. Kelley Lynch Says:

    William Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
    RecibidosX

    Responder |Kelley Lynch para doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., STEPHEN, Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, ajackson, wfrayeh, billpavelic
    mostrar detalles 14:28 (0 minutos antes)

    deKelley Lynch
    paradoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org

    ccajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:28
    asuntoWilliam Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 14:28 (0 minutos antes)

    Hello Investigator Frayeh and Bill,

    I thought you might get a real laugh out of the fact that Rutger is now being attacked and trashed on Phawker.com. Take a look at the criminals that I believe are somehow affiliated with Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, the Clarkson family, and others. Hope you get a good belly laugh.

    You’re only on this email. I think I am communicating perfectly well with the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan on my own.

    Gianelli’s being harassing me via emails and is so interested in my finances, Cohen’s gift taxes, and dead set on slandering me, lying about me, etc.

    This is your buddy, right Bill?

    Kelley

  344. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:39
    asuntoRe: William Frayeh and Bill Pavelic
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 14:39 (0 minutos antes)

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    You have been emailing me for two days. I have sent those emails to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Agent Wynar, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan. You are harassing me, targeting me on Blogs (such as Phawker.com right now), threatening my son, monitoring my activities, lying about me, etc. I can assure you that this is not spam. I don’t know what your “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” emails are but I viewed them as evidence that you are unstable, deeply disturbed, and harassing me. Stop lying about me, stop targeting me on the internet, stop attempting to undermine my credibility and I will stop communicating with you completely. Are we clear?

    Kelley Lynch

    2009/11/25 STEPHEN GIANELLI
    – Ocultar texto citado –

    Ms. Lynch:

    I have asked you repeatedly to stop spamming this address with your inappropriatre and obviosuly desturbed emails, as have many of the other email spam victims cced with your email. Enough already!

  345. Sydney Says:

    BWAAHAAHHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHAHA. Tooooo much…

  346. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:43
    asuntoRe: cc: IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan Re: Gianelli/Blogonaut
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 14:43 (0 minutos antes)

    To the IRS Commisisioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Agent Sopko – the Treasury, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Here’s an email I just received from Stephen Gianelli on my twiggy.ahmadinejad@yahoo.com account. Apparently he can’t make up his mind. I didn’t have a Birkin bag and am not disclosing any personal information to this maniac. It’s none of his business.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
    To: Kelley Lynch
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 2:21:32 PM
    Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim

    Ok, then what did youn pay for you Birken bag adn what do you claim your NM high balance was?

  347. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Kelley Lynch email in out inbox 29 minutes ago:

    “To the FBI and DOJ,

    “Would you please review all the posts on Phawker.com. Gianelli, who does not know me but is fixated on me and clearly stalking me and monitoring my actions, seems to have gone off the deep end again. This is quite unnerving actually. He sees the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko copied in and must understand (being a lawyer) that this is a deadly serious matter – including the fact that Phil Spector was obviously set up.

    “All the best,
    “Kelley”

    Is this woman priceless or what?

    Earth to Ms. Lynch:

    One does not email the Federal Bureau of Investigating and the Internal Revenue Service and ask them to review all of the posts on some blog, unless the asker is a NUT JOB.

  348. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “You have been emailing me for two days.”

    Quite the contrary, Ms. Lynch.

    This blog has recieved 30 emails from you in the last 24 hours.

    We have replied, mainly with laughter, to a half dozen of those emails.

    Once again, you twist the truth to your own ends.

  349. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
    RecibidosX

    Responder |Kelley Lynch para STEPHEN, ajackson, doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, wfrayeh, billpavelic
    mostrar detalles 14:53 (2 minutos antes)

    deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 14:53
    asuntoLet’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 14:53 (2 minutos antes)

    To the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Agent Sopko – the Treasury, Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Here are some of the emails Gianelli-Blogonaut sent me yesterday. This is the man writing me about Birkin bags I never owned, my Neiman’s account (remember – he doesn’t know me), and “spam.” I am actually concerned about his obsession with and fixation on me and my family. I am extremely concerned about this.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    — On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:36 AM

    HAHAHAHA, oh my gawd, it hurts, hshahsahahahsaha!!!!!

    Kelley Lynch you make everyone laugh so hard……hahahahaha!

    — On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject: Re:
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:12 AM

    Hawhahaaawhooohwoo*gasp*hahahaha!!!

    — On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:11 AM

    “positively”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HaHaHaHaaaaHawwhooowhohahaha!!!
    — On Wed, 11/25/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject: Re: Attention: FBI cc: Alan Jackson
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:08 AM

    HahawhaaaaawheeeeeWhooowhoooHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!
    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject: Re: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury – Gianelli’s Definitely Threatening My Family
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:45 PM

    hahahahahawHOOOOOOOWHOOOOhAAAAhA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    — On Tue, 11/24/09, Blogonaut Law-Blog wrote:

    From: Blogonaut Law-Blog
    Subject:
    To: “Kelley Lynch”
    Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:44 PM

    HAhaaaaawHOOOOWHOOOHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    Have us prosecuted?

    Very funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

  350. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Quite the contrary? Then what are the emails of yours that I’ve just posted (above)? You are being copied in because you are not going to have deniability at some future date. You are attempting to undermine my credibility. I believe there is a possible pending federal matter relating to Cohen and I believe that explains why the IRS, DOJ, FBI and Agent Sopko – Treasury are copied in on my emails. I believe I am a potential prominent government witness. I believe you are intentionally witness tampering. I believe you are attempting to sabatage a pending IRS matter. I believe you are dangerous unstable and obsessed with me. And, I know for a fact that you are a pathelogical liar.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
    “You have been emailing me for two days.”

    Quite the contrary, Ms. Lynch.

    This blog has recieved 30 emails from you in the last 24 hours.

    We have replied, mainly with laughter, to a half dozen of those emails.

    Once again, you twist the truth to your own ends.

  351. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    I’m emailing the IRS and FBI and have asked them to review this Blog and – in particular – your posts. They have email addresses and that is one way to communicate with the IRS and FBI. For the record, it’s the Federal Bureau of Investigation – not the Bureau of Investigating although I think it’s clear that you should be investigated. Of course, I can’t prosecute you or threaten prosecution because I’m not a federal prosecutor or attorney. If I were I can assure you that you would end up in prison. No doubt about that. I’d be doing the Cal State Bar Crowd and the United States of America a favor. Think of it as a “compassionate” act.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
    Kelley Lynch email in out inbox 29 minutes ago:

    “To the FBI and DOJ,

    “Would you please review all the posts on Phawker.com. Gianelli, who does not know me but is fixated on me and clearly stalking me and monitoring my actions, seems to have gone off the deep end again. This is quite unnerving actually. He sees the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko copied in and must understand (being a lawyer) that this is a deadly serious matter – including the fact that Phil Spector was obviously set up.

    “All the best,
    “Kelley”

    Is this woman priceless or what?

    Earth to Ms. Lynch:

    One does not email the Federal Bureau of Investigating and the Internal Revenue Service and ask them to review all of the posts on some blog, unless the asker is a NUT JOB.

  352. Sydney Says:

    Da-doo-dum-dum-dum-da-doo-dum-dum……………..

  353. Kelley Lynch Says:

    deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
    asuntoRe: Quite The Contrary Writes Blogonaut-Gianelli Who I View As A Pathelogical Liar And Criminal
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 15:11 (0 minutos antes)

    P.S. I’m assuming “Blogonaut” is his alter-ego but I’m not an FBI profiler. I do, however, see right through this “asshole.” Pardon my french! He cannot contain or control himself.

  354. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Fair Enough? Responder |Kelley Lynch para STEPHEN, ajackson, doronweinberg, Dennis, *IRS.Commissio., ASKDOJ, Kelly.Sopko, washington.fie., Blogonaut, Jewel, Thaye, bhakhatulku, rbyucaipa, Robert, moseszzz, smith, Duane, becknerm, Governor.ritter, attorney.gener., gordonj, lhank, wfrayeh, billpavelic
    mostrar detalles 15:24 (0 minutos antes)

    deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov

    ccdoronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com

    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:24
    asuntoFair Enough?
    enviado porgmail.com

    ocultar detalles 15:24 (0 minutos antes)

    To All The Federal Pranksters Copied In On My Emails,

    Fair enough? You tell him when he’ll be charged and/or prosecuted. I knew there was a good reason why I didn’t follow through with law school. Gianelli should be stapled to that statement as “Exhibit A.” Jackson and his “hairdo” can be “Exhibit B.”

    All the best,
    Kelley

    2009/11/25 Kelley Lynch

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    Why put a time limit on it? Is there a rush to be indicted? You are lying about me and you are not going to deny the fact (at a later date and/or time) that I didn’t do everything humanly possible to set the record straight. You have also threatened my son Rutger and I find that unconscionable. I realize this is a game for you but I’m deadly serious. Write your buddy, Bill Pavelic, who is copied in on this email and about to be removed. Tell him I said – if you want to associate with these thugs you should rot in hell.

    Fine. You haven’t been charged. I can’t speak for federal agencies. Maybe they think you’re behavior – including yesterday’s emails – are perfectly normal. I think they are indicative of the fact that you are dangerously unstable and obsessed with me.

    I’m not focused on time frames. I’m focused on the truth, the facts, and the destruction of my children’s lives. I’m focused on the fact that Rutger has been attacked by “Sydney” who is posting on Phawker.com and your Blog. This isn’t a game and all bets are off. Think of this as pot limit and I’m all in. You’re bluffing. I’m deadly serious. I want you in prison and think you should be. You are playing a game and attempting to sabatage or derail a possible IRS prosecution of Cohen. That’s my personal opinion.

    Agent Sopko can say whatever she wants. Let me assure you of this – Kelly Sopko does not and never will represent me. That’s a direct quote, right: Sopko told you verbatim: “I have nothing to fear.” Sounds like one hell of a conversation. Were you asking her if you were going to be charged or prosecuted?

    Write the people you call “the feds” and ask them for a deadline. You’re playing games with them. I’m not playing games.

    Kelley Lynch

    deSTEPHEN GIANELLI
    paraKelley Lynch
    cc*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
    fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
    asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
    enviado porgmail.com
    firmado porgmail.com
    ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)

    Fair enough Kelley Lynch.

    And can we further agree that if no one affiliated with the Blogonaut.Law.Blog, including the undersigned, is thereafter charged or incited for “witness tampering” , within say, 30 days, then you will stop harassing us?
    In reality, you have made these same allegations on multiple occasions to the FBI, Justice, Agent Sokpo, the IRS, and many others, for over 6 months and we remain uncharged.

    So at what point in time without criminal charges against is are you willing to concede that we are blameless?

    I mean, Agent Sokpo, already told me I have nothing to fear, but by what date are you willing to concede that no federal prosecution is forthcoming?

    Please give us a drop-dead date to calender.

  355. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    OK, we will play, your imagined protector Agent Sopko will decide if posting contrary opinions to yours on a public internet discussion which you initiated is “witness tampering”. Please do let us know of Agent Sopko’s take, will you?

    Because she has already told us that we have nothing to worry about.

    Ms. Lynch, the fact that you believe that the federal employees that you spam daily think you are anything but a stand-out nut case in a government that constantly receives nut case emails is terribly sad, but it is time that you faced facts.

  356. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    PS Kelley Lynch:

    the email header info you pubished, includng “deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI” and “fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
    asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
    enviado porgmail.com
    firmado porgmail.com
    ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)”

    would indicate that you have left Ca and are now in MX.

  357. Sydney Says:

    Good catch Blogonaut. I was wondering why everything was in Spanish. I was hoping that perhaps she had fled to Cuba – you know, somewhere that her freedom to post lies and other nonsense on the internet would be severely restricted.

  358. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.

    We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.

    But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.

    Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.

    Very sick, very pathological.
    Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.

    We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.

    But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.

    Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.

    Very sick, very pathological, very sad.

  359. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, Sopko is not my protector. She is an ordinary human being who should be ashamed of herself and her rotten ordinary position in life.

    Keley Lynch
    http://www.karmapa-issue.org

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
    OK, we will play, your imagined protector Agent Sopko will decide if posting contrary opinions to yours on a public internet discussion which you initiated is “witness tampering”. Please do let us know of Agent Sopko’s take, will you?

    Because she has already told us that we have nothing to worry about.

    Ms. Lynch, the fact that you believe that the federal employees that you spam daily think you are anything but a stand-out nut case in a government that constantly receives nut case emails is terribly sad, but it is time that you faced facts.

  360. Kelley Lynch Says:

    It would indicate nothing, asshole.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
    PS Kelley Lynch:

    the email header info you pubished, includng “deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI” and “fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
    asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
    enviado porgmail.com
    firmado porgmail.com
    ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)”

    would indicate that you have left Ca and are now in MX.

  361. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Am I? How would you know about space, “ASSHOLE?”

    WoW! – you “talked” to the FBI. How impressive. I’ve talked to them also. Who is my “pet” IRS agent that you are attempting to undermine? Maybe the IRS should weigh in on the Karmapa. Really. They’re so all-mighty. They should decide who the real Karmapa is. I know I’m real impressed with Commissioner Doug Shulman who runs one rotten and psychotic “organization.” Shulman should understand this – he is no one. Nothing. His position is temporary and his focus is ordinary and relative.

    Fuck you asshole. I hope you rot in prison.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 25th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
    Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.

    We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.

    But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.

    Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.

    Very sick, very pathological.
    Regardless of Kelley Lynch’s venue, she is running out of room to delude herself–even with her vast capacity to do so.

    We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.

    But we have responded to several emails from “Señoría” Kelley of today cc to the IRS, repeating what common sense informs: Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.

    Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.

    Very sick, very pathological, very sad.

  362. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Give me my pet’s name and badge number, asshole.

    We have talked to the FBI and with Ms. Lynch’s pet IRS agent, and she is not considered credible–no surprises there.

  363. Kelley Lynch Says:

    http://www.karmapaissue.org

    I know Gianelli – the “men” dealing with the politics of China, India, Tibet, Bhutan, Taiwan, etc. are fucking stupid idiots right? Fine. You understand space. They understand assholes and corruption. I have no doubt that they are SO IMPRESSED that you actually talked to my pet IRS agent. You didn’t fuck him also, did you? God. I hope my pet isn’t “gay.”

  364. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Whatever. Pavelic worked for Phil Spector. What is he now – your claim to fame?

    Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.

  365. Kelley Lynch Says:

    And the mob leader attorney, Bruce Cutler, doesn’t like. Whatever. Bruce Cutler is so much better and so much more intelligent than I am. I did not, however, trade Phil Spector’s soul so that I could be really high profile mob leader lawyer. Did I? Bruce Cutler is a traitor. My friend is rottting in prison. Phillip is innocent and Cutler is talking to you about my sexual fantasies. That’s fine. Cutler shold do whatever the hell he wants. I’m fighting like hell for my friend’s life. I will die for Phil Spector. He has been rendered unrecognizable and I could not live with myself if I didn’t stand my ground and stand up against the criminals who set him up. If law enforcement or government wants to target me – know this: I will die and I will reincarnate and I will focus on you for eternity. Take that to your grave. I do not want to live in a country where innocent people rot in prison so people have careers. If you do – sobiet. I also am really uninterested in getting the FBI’s autopgraph. His Holiness Kusum Llingpa predicted the terrorist attack that took out the space shuttle. The FBI can spend an eternity investigating that. Fortunately, they cannot dissect His Holiness. He is dead and his brilliance was inconceivable. He spent 20 years in a prison in Tibet because he refused to turn on the Lord Buddha. He was tortured; dragged behind a truck; hung out in a blizzard; tortured .. and, he is one of the bravest men on this earth. Your crowd – including Jackson – are haridressers compared to His Holiness.

    Kelley Lynch

  366. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    We just recieved this email from KL:

    “Karmapa Khenno,

    “Good evening, Your Holness. Did you know that Agent Kelly Sopko was a dharmapala? I had no idea. What’s her place on the lineage tree? Did you notice that Gianelli copied Rutger in on certain emails.

    “I no longer “cling” – as the great “Dzogchen Master Blogonut” put it to any illusions about Bruce Cutler. I have concluded that Bruce Cutler abandoned Phillip. He is a frivolous man – interested in mob leaders. That’s another game we’re playing in America. John Gotti, Jr. is on trial for the 4th time and the jury is dead-locked. We are under attack by Al Qaeda and the “feds” are focused on some insanity with John Gotti, Jr. No one can figure out the issues. It may be that he quit “the mob” – a really degenerate term for “Italian Americans.” There is something wrong here. There is something wrong with the government’s focus. All His Holiness Kusum Lingpa worried about were extremist Muslims. And yet – our government has endless resources to spend targeting one man who may or may not have murdered someone. We don’t know. We, the ordinary folks, can’t figure out what he’s being charged with.

    “Are you my victim, Karmapa? Am I your stalker?

    “Please give my love and respect to Sharmapa and Jigme Rinpoche. Thank you for protecting me through “prayer” something Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley, Truc Do, Leonard Cohen, Steve Lindsey, and others will never understand. That’s their karma, Karmapa. May they rot in hell.

    “Love,
    “Kelley

    “P.S. Just watched your enthronement. Cannot believe that the 16th Karmapa’s attendant was murdered. Anything for politics, money, and fame, Karmapa. Ordinary men and their ordinary corrupt tendencies. See Gianelli’s email below. XXOO”

    We rest our case.

    –Blogonaut

  367. Sydney Says:

    So much violence for a self-proclaimed Buddhist. Careful there, Kelley, your true colors are coming out loud and clear. Crazy, violent, delusional. What’s wrong Kelley, reality starting to sink in? Truth starting to cut through your BS? Keep it up. It won’t be long before someone has the good sense to lock you up somewhere and throw away the key until sanity overtakes you.

  368. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    BTW, Sydney, between 12:01 am and 5:51pm today this blog received 51 emails from Kelley Lynch–all cced to scores of others. (Oh, yea, that’s “normal” behavior.)

    Generally, when Lynch is cornered with facts and logic, she resorts to sending emails to her “holly men” which are couched in eastern jargon but convey hate and envy. She talks the talk but does not walk the walk.

    Lynch used to hang with some of this crowd through 2005–but she has never published a response to any of her emails, only her one-sided emails to others, cc’d to us, the IRS, Sopko, scores of others, as if to say, “see, I know these important people, I am not a loon”.

    We are not buying it and the IRS does not care.

    Game, set, match.

  369. Sydney Says:

    Too bad none of those people care enough about her to risk involvement in her on-going acid trip. You know, she really doesn’t need real friends when she has so many she can fantasize about. She’s a poser…

  370. Kelly Green Says:

    Good God, Kelley. If you thought I was threatening you with cops with flashlights you’re more insane and hopeless than even I thought possible.

    Someones been watching too much “In Plain Sight” if she thinks the feds will enroll her in the witness protection program. Hmm, perhaps all we can do is hope. Remember the first rule in witness protection is you give up all your prior life: all your contacts, your family, co-workers, advisors, enemies. You’re expected to get a job and be a sane, rational, and productive member of society. Most likely those you’d have to give up would be extatic. You’d just go away—never to be heard from again. Damn, perhaps we should petition the feds to get you in witness protection. Imagine an internet free of Kelley Lynch! One more thing. Care to guess how many 5150 patients claim to be in the witness protection program and how many demand the gov’t put them in witness protection?

  371. Sydney Says:

    One can only hope, Kelly Green. What a miracle to view a web site covering Leonard Cohen and not be deluged with threats and bullshit from Kelley. I think you’re right, she does watch too much TV. Perhaps her current location in Mexico will find her at least a bit restricted when it comes to internet access. Again, one can only hope. Can you believe the crap she’s posting to Blogonaut? If she keeps posting stuff like that, the cops will come and take her away, and it would be good riddance to bad trash.

  372. Kelly Green Says:

    Ok, Kelley, what’s the real reason you left the USA? Too much pressure?

    Do you think any of us are suprised you turned on Agent Sopko? Just out of curiosity, are you related to former Sen Joseph McCarthy? He had an enemies list, too. You should google his name and find out how well his evilness worked for him.

  373. Kelly Green Says:

    And what the hell does Junior Gotti have to do with Leonard Cohen? How dare you slur Italian Americans. You should be ashamed of yourself; however, you’re a sociopath and sociopaths don’t have the ability to experience shame.

  374. Sydney Says:

    Kelley slurs anyone she can think of, whether she knows them or not. Next, we’ll see Gotti’s lawyers being cc’d on her rants. I’m sure they’ll run right out to assist her (sarcasm dripping all over the place), just like Phil Spector’s lawyers are beating a path to her door. And you are absolutely right about sociopaths – no conscience, no shame, no notice of any wrongdoing, everything is everybody’s fault, victimized by society, blah, blah, blah.

  375. Kelly Green Says:

    Wanna bet her reason for leaving the US is cuz she and her “precious evidence” are no longer safe here. That’s right, Kelley, you’re going to save the US from Leonard Cohen and his fans.

    As for the rest of us, we can only hope when she tries to re-enter the US her name pops up on some homeland security screen—and she’s held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI. While I’m not a fan of the Patriot Act, hopefully uncle sam will just make her disappear so she can’t be a threat to anyone.

    Kelley, why do we never see your “Holiness” (and I do mean that respectfully) teacher/friends rsponses to you email? Have they ever replied? I wonder, cuz you just can’t help yourself and you know you’d have to post them.

    To my fellow posters, Happy Thanksgiving!

  376. Kelley Lynch Says:

    What’s the matter, Gianelli-Blogonuat? You don’t like the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa?

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
    We just recieved this email from KL:

    “Karmapa Khenno,

    “Good evening, Your Holness. Did you know that Agent Kelly Sopko was a dharmapala? I had no idea. What’s her place on the lineage tree? Did you notice that Gianelli copied Rutger in on certain emails.

    “I no longer “cling” – as the great “Dzogchen Master Blogonut” put it to any illusions about Bruce Cutler. I have concluded that Bruce Cutler abandoned Phillip. He is a frivolous man – interested in mob leaders. That’s another game we’re playing in America. John Gotti, Jr. is on trial for the 4th time and the jury is dead-locked. We are under attack by Al Qaeda and the “feds” are focused on some insanity with John Gotti, Jr. No one can figure out the issues. It may be that he quit “the mob” – a really degenerate term for “Italian Americans.” There is something wrong here. There is something wrong with the government’s focus. All His Holiness Kusum Lingpa worried about were extremist Muslims. And yet – our government has endless resources to spend targeting one man who may or may not have murdered someone. We don’t know. We, the ordinary folks, can’t figure out what he’s being charged with.

    “Are you my victim, Karmapa? Am I your stalker?

    “Please give my love and respect to Sharmapa and Jigme Rinpoche. Thank you for protecting me through “prayer” something Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley, Truc Do, Leonard Cohen, Steve Lindsey, and others will never understand. That’s their karma, Karmapa. May they rot in hell.

    “Love,
    “Kelley

    “P.S. Just watched your enthronement. Cannot believe that the 16th Karmapa’s attendant was murdered. Anything for politics, money, and fame, Karmapa. Ordinary men and their ordinary corrupt tendencies. See Gianelli’s email below. XXOO”

    We rest our case.

    –Blogonaut

  377. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sorry I have religious beliefs, Sydney? I know you prefer psycho-babble.Sydney What’s violent about stating, for the record, that Gianelli-Blogonaut is an “asshole?” and requesting the name of my “pet” federal agent – go quote Gianelli-Blogonaut?

    Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 10:29 pm
    So much violence for a self-proclaimed Buddhist. Careful there, Kelley, your true colors are coming out loud and clear. Crazy, violent, delusional. What’s wrong Kelley, reality starting to sink in? Truth starting to cut through your BS? Keep it up. It won’t be long before someone has the good sense to lock you up somewhere and throw away the key until sanity overtakes you.

  378. Kelley Lynch Says:

    By the way, Gianelli-Blogonaut, I received six plus deranged emails from you yesterday and a number of emails today about my non-existent Birkin bag. There’s nothing normal about a pathelogical liar that writes me six letters containing “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” – particularly when you are threatening my son and monitoring my actions. You are, from my perspective, a dangerously unstable individual with “motive.”

    Cornered with facts? If you call your garbage lies “facts.” You wanted to discus a Birkin bag that I never owned. You stated, publicly, that there aren’t any Birkin bags listed under $30,000. I found several. Emailing me about handbags does not seem normal – particularly when you are attempting to undermine my credit as a potential prominent government witness and probably have motive to derail and/or sabatage a potential federal government prosecution of Leonard Cohen.

    Are you an atheist, Gianelli-Blogonaut? What’s wrong with “holy men” like the 14th Sharmapa. I see – you, a perfect stranger, know that I “used to hang with some of the crowd” that now has Situ Rinpoche on lock down in India – viewed, by the Indian government, as a national security threat. I had no idea “Sopko” was in the same league as the Karmapa and Sharmapa. I guess your name-dropping of “Agent Sopko” and other pet agents is your way of saying “Hey Look, I’m screwing around with federal agents. They’re real stupid. I’m blatantly witness tampering and no one cares.” Evidence that you may be criminally insane.

    IRS Spokesperson Stephen Gianelli-Blogonaut states his case.

  379. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Too bad the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 14th Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche have to witness people talking about my pet federal agents in a potential federal criminal prosecution. Sydney speaks for these men – who it doesn’t know either. Yes, I’m fantasizing about four great Tibetan lamas who are witnessing utter insanity. I don’t really have to fantasize about their perceptions, however – His Holiness Kusum Lingpa told me that Cohen is “an asshole who is going to hell.”

    I thought I was a homeless loser. Now I’m’ a poser because I have religious beliefs? Sorry, I forgot I was documenting the postings of criminal atheists.

  380. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelly Green, your posting about cops and flashlights is on this Blog. Thanks for warning me not to look up. I didn’t realize they would be targeting me.

    And that someone is you.

    The feds won’t be “enrolling me” in the Sammy Gravano protection system. I’ll take my chances in the real world. Why would “the feds” and my own “pet agent” want to “enroll” me in the witness protection program if there’s no pending federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Norman Cohen? I didn’t realize they had such vast resources to waste – although I know Cohen probably thinks they’re all have a merry time with this “prank” we’re all engaged in. Actually, Rule #1 – do not deal drugs when you are in the federal witness protection program. Gravano forgot this rule and must have also thought that he had some “federal pets.”

    While you focus on the witness protection program – I’ll fantasize about the people I think should bei in prison. Phil Spector’s prosecutors are on that list. I’m not sure Alan Jackson will be permitted to bring his “hair dresser” along, however. Maybe he’ll have a “mob boyfriend” and then he and Brian Bennett can discuss, ad nauseum, whether or not Philllip’s girlfriend was a “mob waitress.” I know Brian Bennett personally raised this as an issue.

  381. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Let me reiterate – Cohen is one hell of a “folk singer.” I wonder why he doesn’t live in Canada?

  382. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Actually, I thought Blogonaut turned on Agent Sopko – who is now apparently my “pet” federal agent.

    Green, you are going to have to prove I left the U.S. This reminds me of a conversation I had with Cohen the day he wanted me to go into Greenberg, Glusker and sign a settlement agreement. I didn’t realize Houston was in another country. Didn’t Gianelli-Blogonaut track me to the Star of Hope? He seemed to track yahoo to Sunnyvale, California.

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 1:41 am
    Ok, Kelley, what’s the real reason you left the USA? Too much pressure?

    Do you think any of us are suprised you turned on Agent Sopko? Just out of curiosity, are you related to former Sen Joseph McCarthy? He had an enemies list, too. You should google his name and find out how well his evilness worked for him.

  383. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I can’t imagine what John Gotti, Jr. would have in common with Cohen except that Cohen loves “the mob” and loves to talk about the “fact” (according to him) that Suzanne Elrod’s family was in the Jewish mafia. I guess you didn’t realize that Cohen loves “the mob.” I am an Italian American.

  384. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, am I now in Mexico? Actually I can’t believe the six emails I posted on this Blog – that I received from Gianelli-Blogonaut yesterday. And then there are the others and today’s emails about a Birkin handbag I never owned. Apparently Gianelli-Blogonaut spoke with Sergeant Fernandez and other members of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department who illegally invaded my house. I know I refused to let Michelle Rice in so I’m assuming his “gossip” about my former house came from them.

    Sydney Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 1:31 am
    One can only hope, Kelly Green. What a miracle to view a web site covering Leonard Cohen and not be deluged with threats and bullshit from Kelley. I think you’re right, she does watch too much TV. Perhaps her current location in Mexico will find her at least a bit restricted when it comes to internet access. Again, one can only hope. Can you believe the crap she’s posting to Blogonaut? If she keeps posting stuff like that, the cops will come and take her away, and it would be good riddance to bad trash.

  385. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I suppose it’s safe to assume that Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan are complete idiots, Sydney – if you insist.

    Sydney Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 2:02 am
    Kelley slurs anyone she can think of, whether she knows them or not. Next, we’ll see Gotti’s lawyers being cc’d on her rants. I’m sure they’ll run right out to assist her (sarcasm dripping all over the place), just like Phil Spector’s lawyers are beating a path to her door. And you are absolutely right about sociopaths – no conscience, no shame, no notice of any wrongdoing, everything is everybody’s fault, victimized by society, blah, blah, blah.

  386. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Do you know why you don’t see people’s emails to me, Green? Because you’re a total stranger who has targeted me. The emails people – like Cohen – really want to see are Richard Westin’s. That was his tax lawyer. Cohen can subpoena them from the IRS. As Cohen himself as brought up in Court repeatedly – my AOL accounts were shut down and I no longer have access to those emails. Hopefully, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Phil Spector reviewed my emails. I did, after all, give them the passwords to tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com. Kory repeatedly mentions this. He seems fixated on it actually.

    Green, you are going to have to prove that I have left the country. No one seems to know who Cohen is in the United States from what I can tell. They do, however, seem to understand that Phil Spector is a legendary record producer whose name sells albums and creates careers – particularly if you throw in the “de riguer” gun story.

    I’m now a threat to the IRS and FBI. I think the IRS and FBI will have to personally address that issue now since I believe you are a liar. But, since you are holding yourself out as a spokesperson for the IRS and FBI you might as well tell the world what else they’re thinking. Why would Uncle Sam want to make me disappear? Am I now in a federal conspiracy? Perhaps Oliver Stone, a friend of mine, can do the movie then. I’ll be sure to ask him to leave your part out.

    Kelly Green Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 3:13 am
    Wanna bet her reason for leaving the US is cuz she and her “precious evidence” are no longer safe here. That’s right, Kelley, you’re going to save the US from Leonard Cohen and his fans.

    As for the rest of us, we can only hope when she tries to re-enter the US her name pops up on some homeland security screen—and she’s held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI. While I’m not a fan of the Patriot Act, hopefully uncle sam will just make her disappear so she can’t be a threat to anyone.

    Kelley, why do we never see your “Holiness” (and I do mean that respectfully) teacher/friends rsponses to you email? Have they ever replied? I wonder, cuz you just can’t help yourself and you know you’d have to post them.

    To my fellow posters, Happy Thanksgiving!

  387. Kelley Lynch Says:

    What’s your point Gianelli-Blogonaut? Let’s stay focused on your psychotic harassment emails to me from yesterday – and today.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
    PS Kelley Lynch:

    the email header info you pubished, includng “deKelley Lynch
    paraSTEPHEN GIANELLI” and “fecha25 de noviembre de 2009 15:11
    asuntoRe: Let’s Take A Good Look At Gianelli-Blogonaut’ss Emails To Me From Yesterday
    enviado porgmail.com
    firmado porgmail.com
    ocultar detalles 15:11 (2 minutos antes)”

    would indicate that you have left Ca and are now in MX.

  388. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, I did not leave the United States and am not in Mexico.

  389. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, read the heading of this Blog. I think it says that Leonard Cohen is not a good man. I suppose that’s some form of coverage for the folk singer from hell. I am not in Mexico but am emailing the IRS and FBI your latest posts about them and my so-called whereabouts.

    Sydney Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 1:31 am
    One can only hope, Kelly Green. What a miracle to view a web site covering Leonard Cohen and not be deluged with threats and bullshit from Kelley. I think you’re right, she does watch too much TV. Perhaps her current location in Mexico will find her at least a bit restricted when it comes to internet access. Again, one can only hope. Can you believe the crap she’s posting to Blogonaut? If she keeps posting stuff like that, the cops will come and take her away, and it would be good riddance to bad trash.

  390. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Bill Pavelic

    Responder

    de Kelley Lynch
    para STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
    cc doronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com
    fecha 26 de noviembre de 2009 01:15
    asunto Bill Pavelic
    enviado por gmail.com
    Siempre se muestran las imágenes de este remitente. No volver a mostrar a partir de ahora
    ocultar detalles 01:15 (0 minutos antes)
    Bill Pavelic,

    You informed Gianelli that I’m a very disturbed woman. How would you know who or what I am? I’ve never met you. The fact that you wrote to this “asshole” is all I need to know about you. Did you also write to Gianelli to explain your public allegations that you, Dr. Lee, and Dr. Baden were set up by LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Unit in Phil Spector’s set up? I mean – after all, Bill – we’re playing big time games here and my sons are literate. I’ll speak to Phillip directly about your email to Gianelli-Blogonaut. I would assume you understand that Phillip will be interested in why Gianelli lied to the FBI about me and phoned Investigator Frayeh.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Blog posts that rebut the opinions of others do not violate federal law, let alone constitute “witness tampering”.

    Kelley Lynch is quite obviously a very disturbed woman–as Bill Pavelic informed us–and she prefers to have no answers so she can carry on with her revenge fantasies indefinitely. Anything but confront reality.

  391. Kelley Lynch Says:

    de Kelley Lynch
    para STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
    cc doronweinberg@aol.com,
    Dennis@riordan-horgan.com,
    *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov,
    ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane ,
    becknerm@bouldercolorado.gov,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    attorney.general@state.co.us,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    lhank@bouldercounty.org,
    wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
    billpavelic@aim.com
    fecha 26 de noviembre de 2009 01:39
    asunto Re: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
    enviado por gmail.com
    Siempre se muestran las imágenes de este remitente. No volver a mostrar a partir de ahora
    ocultar detalles 01:39 (1 minuto antes)
    To the FBI and IRS,

    Why would I be held for being a threat to the IRS and FBI? Is that a game? No. Kelly Green, Gianelli-Blogonaut are not playing a game. They are dead set on undermining my credibility. And Gianelli-Blogonaut has targeted Rutger who was attacked by Sydney today.

    Kelley Lynch

  392. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, “this” is not my sexual fantasy – as you publicly posted Gianelli-Blogonaut. And this is no game. I hate noted that you contacted Rutger today and absolutely view that as a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.

    http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/WuBGzfsExtV/Phil+Spector+Trial+Continues/bUh_gHkRpRs/Pat+Dixon

  393. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Ms: Lynch:

    You sent us 51 emails yesterday and we replied to several.

    Surely this is not “a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.”

    In any event, you have lost this argument as you typically do, with your lack of logic and common sense as well as your signature hyperbole and exaggerated claims of persecution.

  394. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    PS: Spamming this site with 16 posts in a row does not change the fact that you lost the argument, it merely reinforces it.

  395. Sydney Says:

    Blogonaut, I believe she lives to argue. Trouble is, she doesn’t understand even the basics of logical argument. It’s too bad she has no family left who would be willing to spend Thanksgiving with her. Oh, well, the penalty fits the multiple crimes. Kelly Green, that’s a good idea about Homeland Security. If anyone poses a terrorist threat to anyone it’s our dear Kelley. Time to cook for Thanksgiving. Happy Thanksgiving Kelly and Blogonaut.

  396. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I haven’t spammed this site Blogonaut-Gianelli and the site can and should speak for itself. I have emailed them and advised them to maintain the IP address information. Had your crowd not descended I wouldn’t have posted one additional cmoment. However, since I am being slandered, lied about, targeted, and Rutger has now been dragged into it I will address every single fraudulent allegation – regardless of how many posts that requires. This is very very straightforward as are your attempts to witness tamper, undermine my credibility as a witness, and derail any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen. Your attempts to determine what the IRS is doing is dead obvious – hence your call to Agent Wynar where you lied to the FBI that I was “spamming” Agent Sopko (who you are now referring to as my “pet” agent which is pathetic, lame and crass) and email to Agent Sopko. You have publicly stated what they have told you and they will each receive a subpoena and have to take the witness stand and testify to your conversations with them. I would assume the calls with the FBI were recorded because I believe the FBI policy is to record all conversations. That means there will be an accurate recording and transcript reflecting what was actually discussed. I find it somewhat difficult to believe that Agent Wynar would slander me because we are strangers but if he did he will have to take responsibility for that. The same holds true for Agent Sopko who has not asked me to remove her from my emails although Joff Belark suggested in his email to me that she did.

    Contacting Rutger is, to me, evidence that he is also being targeted. Please note: David Moorhead felt he was a material witness for Phil Spector. I know he’s a witness in my future matters. I also happen to believe he is being attacked and threatened – on this Blog and in your emaiils, Joff Belark’s email to him, etc.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 8:14 am
    PS: Spamming this site with 16 posts in a row does not change the fact that you lost the argument, it merely reinforces it.

  397. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, Thank you for confirming that you have received my emails and read my posts addressing your slander, lies, fraudulent allegations, and the lengths you have gone to undermine my credibility. Of course you don’t know me. You have pointed the lengths I, in turn, have had to go to bring the truth to your attention. You should understand how this applies to slander, libel, and defamation laws. You do represent yourself to be a lawyer. No, my emails to you are not a threat, intimidation, or witness tampering. They are addressing those activities that you – and others have engaged in and continue to engage in.

    The argument is not over. It is going to continue in a court of law. I’m documenting evidence of my allegations. I think there is a real possibility that the IRS intends to prosecute Cohen for his tax fraud (I was told is criminal) with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I also happen to believe that’s why they, the FBI, DOJ, and Treasury are copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting the tax fraud – and the conduct of law enforcement and government officials. That prosecution may not be public right now but that does not mean that it’s not pending. I don’t think it’s logical to conclude that the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and/or Treasury are copied in for frivolous reasons. In fact, I think that’s absurd to assume.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 8:09 am
    Ms: Lynch:

    You sent us 51 emails yesterday and we replied to several.

    Surely this is not “a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.”

    In any event, you have lost this argument as you typically do, with your lack of logic and common sense as well as your signature hyperbole and exaggerated claims of persecution.

  398. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney, I know the basics of logical argument – including the Tibetan basics. They are brilliant at debate. One basic fact is your position must be true and factual. Another – you cannot be on every side of every argument.

    How would you know where I am spending Thanksgiving and whether or not I will be with family members? You don’t know me and you don’t know my family.

    Preposterous and gratuitous remark about Homeland Security. It wasn’t a good point on the part of Kelly Green either because I am not and have not recently been in Mexico.

    Kelley Lynch

    Sydney Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am
    Blogonaut, I believe she lives to argue. Trouble is, she doesn’t understand even the basics of logical argument. It’s too bad she has no family left who would be willing to spend Thanksgiving with her. Oh, well, the penalty fits the multiple crimes. Kelly Green, that’s a good idea about Homeland Security. If anyone poses a terrorist threat to anyone it’s our dear Kelley. Time to cook for Thanksgiving. Happy Thanksgiving Kelly and Blogonaut.

  399. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Blogonaut-Gianelli, I don’t think you are in a position to define logical. You have lied to the FBI and I believe you know you are witness tampering and attempting to undermine my credibility as a potential prominent government witness. I don’t see much common sense in that particularly as you are well aware that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Agent Sopko – the Treasury, the DOJ, and FBI are copied in on my emails. Those emails, as you also know, are documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud. I guess Agent Sopko and/or Agent Wynar weren’t able to give you the details you wanted about Cohen’s probable and/or possible pending tax fraud matter. That’s a logical conclusion – based on common sense.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 8:09 am
    Ms: Lynch:

    You sent us 51 emails yesterday and we replied to several.

    Surely this is not “a threat, intimidation tactic, and witness tampering.”

    In any event, you have lost this argument as you typically do, with your lack of logic and common sense as well as your signature hyperbole and exaggerated claims of persecution.

  400. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    On the contrary Ms. Lynch, logic is our game.

    BTW, copying scores of public officials (including the federal employees you mention in your post) does not give your emails any greater credibility nor does it constitute an endorsement by any of them of your wacky views. But somehow you believe that it does. This evinces a logical disconnect.

    A prime example of you logical disconnect is in your letter that formed the basis for this post. You end it by stating that Cohen expects that “Phil Spector and I will take the fall for him.”

    Even if one buys your tripe about Cohen “destroying your life” (we do not) it is hard to see how you have made a case that Phil Spector’s current incarceration on murder charges is in any way related to Leonard Cohen–let alone the claim that Spector “took the fall” for Cohen. Are you saying that Cohen murdered Lana Clarkson or set up Spector to take that “fall”?

    This is about as logical as you pulling the phrase “prominent government witness” from the sentence “No case that featured Lynch as a prominent government witness could go forward because she is not credible” and (as you did several times above) exclaiming “see, you admit that I am a ‘prominent government witness'”. No, the poster said just the opposite.

    Finally, Ms. Lynch, we have now received over 60 emails from you in slightly over 24 hours–literally around the clock.

    It is easy to see why judges in two states issued civil harassment orders against you. You don’t know when to stop, or how much is to much.

    Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

  401. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I don’t believe logic is your strong point but I am aware that this is a game for you.

    I am not attempting to have the federal government, or anyone else, endorse my allegations and/or positions. I am documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud (that I was told is criminal) and being dragged into Phil Spector’s deranged set up. I think I’ve been clear about this and your attempts to twist this is not going to work. That’s why I will address every lie you utter. Here’s what I believe – the federal government, and in particular the IRS, should take allegations of criminal tax fraud supported by evidence and witnesses very very seriously. Are you arguing other – illogically and irrationally? The penalties and interest, on three companies alone, came to approximately $30 million. Cohen himself has raised the “massive tax hit” as a very real issue so what you are saying is truly twisted logic.

    Cohen has apparently perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury (if Mick Brown was correct when he wrote me that Cohen testified against Phillip – reversing his position that his comments about Phillip over the years were good rock ‘n roll stories (and confirmed for the detectives I met). He has publicly slandered me and lied about me. His lawyer filed a Declaration in my son’s custody matter – which is nothing other than witness tampering and an attempt to obstruct justice, coercion, blackmail, etc. My son witnessed a conversation about criminal tax fraud, missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that Cohen “stole” (please refer to the corporate indexes you were interested in the other day), and their threats. Cohen has attempted to protect himself, cover up what I am convinced is criminal activity, and I am convinced he has used the Phil Spector murder trial to do that. It’s not a logical disconnect. People get this – I was probably dragged to King Drew and questioned about Phil Spector (and the entire file was falsified) in order to determine what I knew about Phil Spector and guns and to undermine me as a witness for the IRS, etc. Only the day before the SWAT incident, Kory wrote me about his extensive negotiating powers (keep in mind that I was offered 50% community property in front of witnesses) and raised issues about the IRS demanding information on issues going back many years. It is illogical, therefore, to conclude that there are not tax issues. Furthermore, Kory personally advised my lawyers – who put this in writing – that he didn’t have a handle on the tax issues and was concerned about even requesting copies of the Traditional Holdings tax returns from the IRS. You do not have the evidence I have sent to the IRS and others – including Westin’s memorandums that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings was “dangerous” to the structure and real concern that an “astute agent” would notice a disregard for form and overturn the entity. What does that tell you? You’re a lawyer. Therefore, your position is ludicrous – if not insane.

    I could care less what you do or don’t buy – including your absurd lie that I owned a $30,000 Birkin bag which I did not. I am merely addressing your lies, slander, defamation, and assaults on my reputation. These issues are going to be raised in court and the burden of proof will fall on you. Truth, as you must know, is the defense to slander. You are standing on lies.

    If Cohen perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury then Cohen assisted the District Attorney in obtaining an indictment. He is a very calculated man and an excellent pathelogical liar and his testimony would have carried tremendous weight. Please keep in mind that he has been referred to in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine so he has been used against Phillip publicly in an attempt to gain a conviction.

    How sickening. Cohen didn’t murder Clarkson. She obviously shot herself. You are a sick and twisted individual and I am convinced that you are dangerously unstable although I understand your motive(s). Phil Spector is a genius. He has huge attorneys behind him and they are very very serious men and women. He has five of the greatest forensic scientist in the country on record stating that Clarkson shot herself. I believe the Appeals Court will see right through this situation and reverse the conviction. You yourself have mentioned the insanity with the 1101 evidence issues. And there are many serious issues for an appeal. The venerable Dennis Riordan, as you refer to him, is no doubt preparing a stunning appeal and brilliant document.

    Why shouldn’t I pull the phrase “prominent government witness” out of the sentence you have just quoted? That is precisely what it states. No case that we are aware of publicly is a better way to refer to the potential IRS prosecution of Cohen.

    Who really cares what a bunch of liars with motive conclude? I’m just documenting your lies and slander, addressing them, and setting the record straight.

    Kelley Lynch

    This is about as logical as you pulling the phrase “prominent government witness” from the sentence “No case that featured Lynch as a prominent government witness could go forward because she is not credible” and (as you did several times above) exclaiming “see, you admit that I am a ‘prominent government witness’”. No, the poster said just the opposite.

    Finally, Ms. Lynch, we have now received over 60 emails from you in slightly over 24 hours–literally around the clock.

    It is easy to see why judges in two states issued civil harassment orders against you. You don’t know when to stop, or how much is to much.

    Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

  402. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, I will send you as many emails as need be in order to address your lies and slander. Your emails are evidence of harassment – including the “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” series. Mine are addressing very serious and very real issues.

    I didn’t show up for Cohen’s first fraudulent restraining order matter in Los Angeles because I intend to use that as evidence against him in the future. I showed up in Boulder, Colorado, to nail the fact that I believe Ronald Mitchell was acting in collusion with Cohen and to address the fact that all issues between me and Cohen stem from the fact that I reported his tax fraud that I was told is criminal. There was no need to convert any matter into an IRS matter. The adversarial position I am now in with respect to Cohen is solely due to the fact that I refused to be bribed (50% community property) or coerced (Ray’s custody matter, etc.) into making an illegal deal – presumably in an attempt to have me testify that Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. Cohen has a grave disdain for ordinary tax returns and that’s one of the reasons, from my perspective, that he does not live in Canada where – according to a brilliant attorney (my former brother-in-law) there are serious residence (and tax) issues.

    Civil harassment orders are a dime a dozen. I wouldn’t go near Cohen if he paid me $10 million. The man gives me the creeps and is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency – whatsoever. I know – I worked with him for approximately 20 years.

    Kelley Lynch

    Finally, Ms. Lynch, we have now received over 60 emails from you in slightly over 24 hours–literally around the clock.

    It is easy to see why judges in two states issued civil harassment orders against you. You don’t know when to stop, or how much is to much.

  403. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. That’s why I didn’t attend the meeting Cohen came to at my lawyers offices – with Richard Westin, Riccardo Cestero, Anjani Thomas, and Lorca Cohen. I informed my lawyers that I would never set foot near this maniac again. I am waiting to address everything legally. I will not use rotten legal tactics – such as fraudulent restraining orders in an attempt to silence the truth. I will not have to perjure himself as Cohen has, repeatedly, and I will not target minor children – as Cohen and Kory did when Robert Kory filed a Declaration in Ray’s custody matter in retaliation for the fact that he witnessed a very serious conversation about tax fraud, theft, and threats. I also won’t withhold information and didn’t steal from Cohen. He stole from me and the corporate books, records, notarized documents, stock certificates, and a complete forensic accounting (that I would like to give the IRS) will prove this. I also won’t issue illegal K1s and make someone an illegal partner on any entity but I will prove that this is precisely what Cohen has done. This is how Cohen has decided to address his “massive tax hit” which arose solely due to his grave and utter disdain for ordinary income taxes. His demands that all deals be done as stock deals was preposterous and costly – to him. It also lowered my commission (which you added $1 million to – quite a hefty exaggeration/lie) substantially. And, Cohen, Greenberg, Westin were wrapped in attorney/client privilege – essentially leaving me in the dark.

    I also think the IRS will want to address the $1 million and $7 million 1099s that were issued and then reissued as $0 1099s. I know the Ogden, Utah IRS agent was attempting to address the $1 million deposit that was not a “loan” and audits were beginning to become issues.

    Kelley Lynch

  404. Kelley Lynch Says:

    from Kelley Lynch
    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane
    cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com,
    “Hoffman, Rand”
    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:17 AM
    subject Re: More Lies And Nonsense From Gianelli-Blogonaut, Syndney And The Crowd From Phil Spector’s Appeal Watch On Blogonaut
    mailed-by gmail.com
    hide details 9:17 AM (0 minutes ago)
    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    I wonder why Gianelli-Blogonaut’s so interested in Leonard Cohen’s role in Phillip’s matter. Clearly, if he perjured himself in the grand jury, that opens the indictment up to attack. Obviously, that is a deadly serious issue that people understand. The lies about a Birkin bag, my lifestyle, and the fraudulent restraining orders are not going to change the facts of this situation. I guess the IRS doesn’t want to know why Cohen received $1 million and $7 million 1099s from Sony which were then corrected to $0 1099s. Cohen has now successfully proven – based on fraud and perjury (because I was not a trustee) that these assets were his. He has proven that I was defrauded and this is supported by the corporate documents. Traditional Holdings, LLC has now issued him an $8 million 1099 for all the assets that should have gone into Traditional Holdings, LLC – addressing the income, his loans, distributions (regardless of their nature and/or characterization), and wasted assets including his transaction fees and one payment for the failed CAK bond deal. Cohen himself signed the fax to Greenberg authorizing payment of these transaction fees. I tend to doubt “illiteracy” is a defense – particularly since this man is a writer and the written word is his weapon.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  405. Kelley Lynch Says:

    from Kelley Lynch
    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane
    cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com
    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM
    subject Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
    mailed-by gmail.com
    hide details 9:22 AM (0 minutes ago)
    Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Blogonaut-Gianelli is playing a game with logic – see below. He wants to know if Cohen murdered Lana Clarkson. He is a lame, vicious idiot. Even Boies Schiller understood that Cohen was attempting to blame his civil and/or criminal wrongdoing on me. They made an excellent point – why would Leonard Cohen make Kelley Lynch an enemy? Because of his disdain for ordinary income taxes – that’s why. Otherwise, he would have gone to the IRS with me.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  406. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “Civil harassment orders are a dime a dozen.”

    Really? I don’t have a single acquaintance who has had one issued against them, let alone two.

    Moreover, if what you are saying was true, you would not have telephoned Cohen and left him voice messages when you initially fled to New Jersey after the September, 2008 civil harassment restraining order was issued.

    You are so obsessed with Leonard Cohen that you literally spend 18 hours a day, every day, blogging and sending emails to hundreds of strangers about Cohen—sometimes writing them ten and fifteen times a day.

    And you are so ill that you cannot see that sending someone 60 emails in one day is clearly excessive and over the line into harassment.

    Clearly you cannot help yourself.

    Last, do you see the inconsistency in combining the assertions that “is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency – whatsoever” with the phrase “I worked with him for approximately 20 years”?

    Unless you were utterly desperate for a job, a reasonable person would find it hard to believe that was your opinion of Cohen for the 20 years he employed you as his manager.

    In any event, I am done with this post and it is time for me to drive to our friend’s house in Sonoma for Thanksgiving dinner.

    Adios, Ms. Lynch.

  407. Kelley Lynch Says:

    from Kelley Lynch
    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane
    cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    Mick Brown
    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:36 AM
    subject Re: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
    mailed-by gmail.com
    hide details 9:36 AM (0 minutes ago)
    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    People are overwhelmed when they hear the amounts. This is a game for Gianelli-Blogonaut who appears to be out of touch with reality. What happens if the IRS does endorse my viewpoints or allegations? I don’t see how that is problematic. Many many people are wondering why Cohen hasn’t been arrested and prosecuted. Of course, Phil Spector knows if Cohen testified against him in his grand jury and I have no idea why Mick Brown would just decide to write and lie to me about that. I understand why Sharmapa has serious issues with Mick Brown but to simply make up a story about receiving a packaging containing grand jury testimony seems truly bizarre. Cohen does, however, absolutely appear in at least one public document (Motion in Limine) filed by the prosecutors in Phillip’s matter. There is a reason for that and it will be hard to reconcile with what he told the detectives I met – that his comments about Phillip over the years were good rock ‘n roll comments. It’s interesting that Gianelli-Blogonaut can read but willfully disregards all relevant points – and he’s a self-proclaimed lawyer who I believe should also be disbarred for what is going on here. I also want to know how extensive his contacts with Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen and/or his advisers, and others relevant to my matters are – including Investigator Frayeh. To assume that Phil Spector will not want to know what is going on with Gianelli-Blogonaut with respect to me and specifically as it relates to Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and Investigator Frayeh is absurd and sheer lunacy. Even a school child could understand this.

    Mr. Spector has clearly stated that he was framed. Leonard Cohen appears to be involved in that situation.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    BTW, copying scores of public officials (including the federal employees you mention in your post) does not give your emails any greater credibility nor does it constitute an endorsement by any of them of your wacky views. But somehow you believe that it does. This evinces a logical disconnect.

  408. Kelley Lynch Says:

    from Kelley Lynch
    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
    Robert MacMillan ,
    “Lee K. Alpert” ,
    Thaye Dorje ,
    “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ,
    moseszzz@mztv.com,
    “m.j. smith” ,
    Duane
    cc ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    Jewel of Activity ,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com,
    “Hoffman, Rand” ,
    Teresa Low ,
    PIU ,
    MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
    OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
    chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,
    Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
    governor@governor.ca.gov,
    “attorney. general” ,
    attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
    stan.garnett@gmail.com,
    gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
    becknerm ,
    “Hank, Larry” ,
    “John Hall, Chief of Police” ,
    lwieseltier@tnr.com,
    Mick Brown
    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM
    subject Re: Mark Beckner, Chief of Police, Boulder
    mailed-by gmail.com
    hide details 9:41 AM (0 minutes ago)
    P.P.S. From now on I’ll use “We Tip” dot com.
    – Hide quoted text –

    On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
    P.S. Hang onto Gianelli and/or Belark’s email communication with Boulder PD about Rutger. I definitely intend to subpoena that and if you think otherwise you should speak to an attorney yourself. I will most definitely address the fraudulent restraining order in Boulder and that’s why I appeared and filed a Motion to Quash. I don’t think I am done challenging Cohen’s perjury in his Declaration or the process server’s perjury and other issues – such as “Ronald Mitchell.” Boulder PD wasn’t able to investigate John/Jeff’s public allegations at the Boulder Hostel that he murdered a 15 year old, was he? Klauss, a police officer I volunteered with at the Birds of Prey, thought this was an incredibly serious matter that demanded an investigation because, as he put it, there is no way I personally could determine if it was the truth. His conduct supported the fact that he appeared to be a dangerous man. There are witnesses to this.

    On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
    Hi Mark,

    As Chief of Police of Boulder PD what do you think happens when a “cop” harasses someone who is the victim of a fraudulent restraining order? It exposes them to liability.

    Kelley Lynch

  409. Kelley Lynch Says:

    If you don’t know anyone with a civil restraining order you must not know anyone involved in a marital and/or custody dispute. They are the de riguer rotten legal tactic of the day and I believe they are unconstitutional and will challenge them on that basis. There is a landmark case in New Jersey that has begun to challenge these “pre-crime” crystal ball tactics.

    I didn’t flee to New Jersey.

    I have addressed the reasons for my emails and posts and you have confirmed that you read and understand federal agencies and parties are copied in on my emails which are not harassment. That is not true of emails that are merely meant to harass me – such as “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha” which serve no other purpose. A jury can decide these issues.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
    “Civil harassment orders are a dime a dozen.”

    Really? I don’t have a single acquaintance who has had one issued against them, let alone two.

    Moreover, if what you are saying was true, you would not have telephoned Cohen and left him voice messages when you initially fled to New Jersey after the September, 2008 civil harassment restraining order was issued.

    You are so obsessed with Leonard Cohen that you literally spend 18 hours a day, every day, blogging and sending emails to hundreds of strangers about Cohen—sometimes writing them ten and fifteen times a day.

    And you are so ill that you cannot see that sending someone 60 emails in one day is clearly excessive and over the line into harassment.

    Clearly you cannot help yourself.

    Last, do you see the inconsistency in combining the assertions that “is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency – whatsoever” with the phrase “I worked with him for approximately 20 years”?

    Unless you were utterly desperate for a job, a reasonable person would find it hard to believe that was your opinion of Cohen for the 20 years he employed you as his manager.

    In any event, I am done with this post and it is time for me to drive to our friend’s house in Sonoma for Thanksgiving dinner.

    Adios, Ms. Lynch.

  410. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Why I worked for Cohen is none of your business and not an issue.

    Last, do you see the inconsistency in combining the assertions that “is a cruel and vicious human being with no decency – whatsoever” with the phrase “I worked with him for approximately 20 years”?

    Unless you were utterly desperate for a job, a reasonable person would find it hard to believe that was your opinion of Cohen for the 20 years he employed you as his manager.

  411. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I’ll spend 24 hours a day, if necessary, addressing his lies, slander, fraud, and the fact that he targeted my children and parents and probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s matter. I have credible and extensive evidence of my job searches so I think a jury will understand this. I have no interest, whatsoever, in Cohen. I worked with him for 20 years and remain unimpressed. It was a job. I had two children to support. Not everyone likes the person who they work for. You might tolerate them, however. And, just because someone is a celebrity does not mean that they are a decent human being. Are you speaking for the world now, Gianelli-Blogonaut? When and if someone has asked to be removed from my emails I have done that promptly when possible. Now and then I have inadvertently sent an errant email or failed to remove someone. I then followed up and pointed this out to them or visa versa. I have documented this. What’s really irrational and illogical is your obsession with me, Cohen, and the Phil Spector matter. Your communication with Alan Jackson is of the utmost importance to me – as is your call to Investigator Frayeh. Your lies to the FBI will be explored in a court of law. You have publicly stated what Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko have told you. You have publicly stated what Bruce Cutler, Phil Spector’s former attorney, told you. Why you were contacting these parties, and Cohen’s advisers – as you also publicly stated, is worthy of an investigation. I think Phil Spector will agree and I intend to print this Blog out and mail it to him, together with my letter to Jackson, in Prison. You do not speak for Phil Spector and I doubt he authorized you to speak on behalf of his attorneys, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan, who happen to be brilliant men in thieir own right.

    Kelley Lynch

    You are so obsessed with Leonard Cohen that you literally spend 18 hours a day, every day, blogging and sending emails to hundreds of strangers about Cohen—sometimes writing them ten and fifteen times a day.

  412. Kelley Lynch Says:

    For the record, I type over 100 wpm so I don’t spend 18 hours a day responding to your and others lies and slander.

  413. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Oh please Lynch give us all a break, at least stop sending us unwanted mails to our private E-mail addresses, you have been asked several times NOT to send me mails, I still receive some every day.
    Do you want to hear what I think? No, I din’t think so, but I will tell you anyway.
    I do not think anybody is going to sue you for anything, because what is the point?
    Either you will not show up in court or if you get a judgement against you, you will just ignore it as “Bogus or fraudulent”
    I am absolutely sure you will never sue anybody, and you know it too, you feel some kind of sick “power” with all your threats, don’t you understand that it makes you look like a freaky joke?
    I do not believe , the IRS, DJO, FBI, Riordan or Weinberg or “The Holy men” ever read your millions of mails, I believe they have either blocked your mails or put them on “Auto-delete”, they would not have time to do their work if they had to read all your garbage.
    I also believe that you thrive on these arguments with “us strangers”, why else would you write on public blogs, you can “document the destruction of our life” on private blogs.
    You do not want to hear arguments about your life, your children, your finances “from strangers”, still you expose everything to strangers, what is up with that??
    I also believe that you are absolutely obsessed and in love with Leonard Cohen, and the fact that he chose to be with beautiful woman like Rebecca De Mornay and Anjana Tomas instead of you makes you absolutely furious and therefore you had to find all these reasons to “nail” him. Is that not the real truth Kelley?
    I do not know if Phil Spector killed that woman and neither do you, maybe not even Spector knows, but it has nothing to do with Leonard Cohen, his remarks 30 years ago has nothing to do with why Spector was convicted.
    Please go into your little hole in the wall and write a book or your journal, and let us, who like Leonard Cohen and his work, enjoy that. Your slandering of him is not going to change anybody’s mind about him, on the contrary, anybody who have read your garbage will have even more respect for him than before we had ever heard the name Kelley Lynch, he should be nominated for sainthood being able to be around you for 18 years.
    And oh yes, the way you have dragged your children into this public mess is a disgrace and shamefull, you have to be a very unloving and abusive mother to expose them to this humiliation
    Now enjoy your Thanksgiving
    Susanne

  414. Sydney Says:

    Kelley, the length of time your are on-line with your nonsense rantings is indicated every time you post. Try to pay attention now – each time you post, the date and time of that post is shown. Can”t argue with that. You don’t have any power to secrete those numbers. You don’t seem to get that you leave a paper trail everywhere you go. Like I said earlier, if you don’t want people to comment about your posts, keep a secret journal of all this evidence you’re lying about. You can be assured that no one will bother you under those circumstances. No one will miss you…

  415. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, save the Thanksgiving insults. I am not emailing you at this time but you seem to think it’s acceptable to contact me – via my private email address – when you see fit. I have informed you that I am addressing your lies, slander, and malicious gossip all intended (obviously) to undermine my credibility. I don’t think any intelligent person would fall for the delusional position that I am spamming or harassing any of you. Gianelli-Blogonaut sent me approximately six positively deranged emails that contained various references to “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.” He has now taken to insulting Agent Kelly Sopko of the Treasury Department by calling her my “pet” agent. Your conduct is immature, lame, malicious, and truly astounding. What emails have you received from me today or yesterday? Post the last few public emails you received from me. I have all my emails and they document all communications with you.

    Why would I want to hear what a perfect stranger who has not reviewed evidence thinks? I want to address your lies, gossip, and slander. I will show up in court – do not ever underestimate that. I will write my own legal responses. I will subpoena parties – as I have done in the past. I did not respond to Cohen’s fraudulent lawsuit in Los Angeles because I believed it was an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud as I advised his representatives. I did not appear at his fraudulent restraining order hearing because I wanted to use that as evidence of the tactics being used against me. I showed up at the garbage hearing meant to silence me with respect to the IRS matter (which no one can say with any certainty is or is not pending) and I will show up at every single proceeding from here on out. Underestimate my focus and underestimate my ability to raise funds to attend a hearing anywhere. I also did not participate in Neal Greenberg’s garbage companion suit because I had no interest in the “interpleaded funds” and advised the judge that I would not enter an appearance, that the matter involved criminal tax fraud, and ultimately told him to mail Cohen a check. I will ignore nothing and have ignored nothing. I’ve simply refused to participate in Cohen’s insanity. I would be only too happy to respond to any future garbage involving him, however.

    Who cares if you are “sure” I will never sue anybody. I don’t know that because I intend to sue quite a number of parties. Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken – but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.

    Well, I know for a fact that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff reads my emails because Agent Sopko confirmed this for me in our meeting. Perhaps they are just following what might turn into a Hollywood “blockbuster” as many people have suggested. The IRS caper will be featured in any such story. How would you know if the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Mr. Riordan and Mr. Weinberg (Phil Spector’s attorneys), or various Tibetan lamas (who are my friends and teachers) will ever read or have read my emails. I have now publicly confirmed that Agent Sopko – who is not my “pet” agent and I find that kind of condescending insult offensive for reasons that have nothing to do with Agent Sopko – told me that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff was reading my emails. I was told by her partner that quite a number of people are reading my emails. And, I was told by the Treasury agents that the issues are complicated and was asked to set them forth in writing in a simple manner. I attempted to do that for Mr. Robb Watts/State of Kentucky, who made the same request after we spoke, and believe that letter serves as a basic foundation for understanding these issues. Ann Diamond’s essentially factual article – that needs to be corrected with respect to a number of issues and chronological mistakes – gives a relatively simple overview of the events as they unfolded until a certain point in time. Ms. Diamond wrote that article with the intention of submitting it to Rolling Stone. This apparently upset Cohen who had his lawyers threaten Ms. Diamond and that activity was followed by his flying into Boulder, Colorado – a true act of desperation on his part and evidence, to me, that he is fully aware of his attempts to obstruct justice and the lengths he will go in his attempts to blame his tax fraud on others. Do you have evidence that any of these parties have blocked my emails or have them on auto-delete? You h ave raised the precise issue I have raised – the government resources that have been wasted due to Cohen’s tax fraud and the Phil Spector set up are astounding. If the IRS decides to prosecute Leonard Cohen legal documents have to be prepared and I know for a fact that these are extremely complex tax issues, elaborate corporate scam structures, and truly ugly details. Furthermore, these issues need to be transformed from tax law into dollar amounts. That is a tremendous amount of work and as Gianelli-Blogonaut stated (and is one thing I agree with him about) this would take a team of lawyers and paralegals to deal with. And that does not include the activity that is being expended engaging in what I view as very very serious criminal conduct – including the reality that Phil Spector was set up and the Department of Justice, FBI, and others really should investigate the District Attorney of Los Angeles and other agencies. The bill for that investigation, and any possible prosecutions, should be shared by all the parties with motive who have participated in the Los Angeles “sport” of nailing a celebrity. It’s not all that difficult to read my emails. My friends are and they don’t have any problems, whatsoever, following the logic, story, crimes, and or the fact that federal agencies are copied in and should be undertaking investigations and prosecutions. That translates as: many people in the United States of America are sick of corruption and do not believe that fraudulent celebrities like Leonard Cohen should continue to get away with tax fraud. People are also sick and tired of government corruption and law enforcement misconduct.

    You hold yourself in far too high esteem. I find you boring, tedious, monotonous, vicious, malicious, abusive, sophomoric, mean-spirited, unintelligent, and I view you as people with motive to undermine an innocent woman and her children. I personally view you as a cult victim and have been clear about this. I believe you are entertaining yourself with this situation and it has given you some sense of self-importance and fulfills some vulgar need of yours. I wrote a response to an article that appeared on Phawker’s public Blog. They, in turn, printed that. You and your cyber-terrorist crowd descended on this Blog and I have been clear – I will address every single lie, every instance of slander, defamation and libel, and every single fraudulent allegation. I will ultimately use this in a court of law and the burden at that time will be on the liars and slanderers. Do not consider yourself a party to any lawsuit that I will file. I consider you a moronic idiot.

    Why would anyone want to hear arguments about their life and their children, their finances, etc. from absolute strangers who are in no position – whatsoever – to argue anything including the fact that I did not own a Birkin bag or live a luxurious life. My finances are no one’s business. My children are my business and I am especially focused on any areas where they are threatened, intimidated, harassed, insulted, and/or slandered. I also do not want to hear your views on whether or not I was Cohen’s “love.” You do not know me. You were not there. He is a liar. He can never prove this. It is not a compliment. It is an intentional lie meant to deceive people and terribly calculated. Who cares what you believe? I’m not interested in Leonard Cohen and he can drop dead (literally) for all I care. The best thing that has happened to me was to be forced into a position where I could walk away from him and Steven Clark Lindsey. Who cares if he was with De Morney. They spent nights arguing about me. I know this because Cohen told me this. She was apparently incredibly jealous of me. DeMornay herself told me that she thought Cohen attempted to sabatage our friendship. We were, at one point, friends. I can assure you that I was not and never will be jealous of Rebecca DeMornay. I won’t comment on Anjani Thomas. No. I didn’t report Leonard Cohen to the IRS because I was jealous. I reported hims because I was told, and believe, he committed criminal tax fraud with penalties and interest in the vicinity of $30 million. I do, however, think he was jealous and that’s why he went into Lindsey’s office to profess that I had sex with Oliver Stone and Richard Rutowski. He is a jealous, obsessed pervert.

    I know that Phil Spector didn’t shoot Lana Clarkson and so do some of the major forensic scientists in this country and possibly the world who concluded that Clarkson shot herself. If Cohen perjured himself in Phillip’s grand jury then the issues are related. He appears in the prosecutor’s Motion in Limine. That is not an innocent matter. Find the grand jury testimony and review Cohen’s. Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that he had copies that were mailed him and stated that Cohen testified. I had no reason to believe he lied to me. If Cohen perjured himself it has everything to do with the indictment.

    People have suggested that I write a book about this situation. They have brought up a Hollywood film as well. I am writing a book on Leonard Cohen and my experiences with him. If you choose not to read it I won’t be insulted. I’ll take it as a compliment. Unfortunately, I am telling the truth about Cohen – although I know it is truly ugly and deranged.

    Cohen dragged my children into this – as did Steven Clark Lindsey – when he targeted and slandered Rutger and had his lawyer file a Declaration in my son’s custody matter. His lawyer doesn’t know my son. My son, unfortunately, witnessed a conversation between me and Robert Kory about Cohen’s criminal tax fraud, the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that was stolen, and their threats. You cannot twist those facts. I am not an abusive Mother and this is something that is going to be addressed in Court. Steven Clark Lindsey is an abusive father and Child Services was supposed to send him to anger management. I personally think prison would be a better answer.

    For the record, Betsy Superfon told me that Steven Clark Lindsey took Ray away from me to keep him out of Cohen’s tax fraud matter and intended to give him back at a later date. She also told me there was something in it for him (with Cohen) – like money.

    Kelley Lynch

  416. Kelley Lynch Says:

    What’s wrong, Sydney? Nothing to post about on Blogonaut’s Phil Spector “watch?” Don’t worry – I’m certain Dennis Riordan (who Blogonaut-Gianelli calls “venerable” but also happens to speak for somehow – although he doesn’t know him but Mr. Riordan may have waved to him once) will file a magnificent appeal that many, many attorneys and lay people will want to read and study. I personally look forward to that.

    That’s correct. Each time I post the date and time is shown. Take the total number of words and figure in that I type 100 wpm and you will have the precise time I have spent addressing your lies, slander, defamation, libel, and fraudulent allegations. It’s very very simple math. I am intentionally creating a paper trail that documents precisely what is going on here and on other internet sites and via emails. Pay close attention to that, Sydney. I intend to use these documents in a court of law. I have already advised Phawker that I intend to subpoena the IP address information and have asked them to maintain that information. At that time, I will turn it over to Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agent Sopko – the Treasury, and the news media copied in on my public emails documenting the destruction of my life. I will also subpoena all communications between Gianelli-Blogonaut and the District Attorney of Los Angeles, Alan Jackson, Donna Clarkson and her legal team, Leonard Cohen and his advisers or friends, my so-called former friends, and others. Blogonaut-Gianelli is clear on this and should not attempt to destroy evidence.

    I am writing a book about Leonard Cohen. I am documenting your lies and slander on this Blog. You descended on this site and your motive is clearly to undermine my credibility and attack my children. I see that you’re frustrated that you can’t silence me.

    Kelley Lynch

  417. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Alan Jackson and Gianelli-Blogonaut: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters

    from Kelley Lynch

    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity
    cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Paul Burger ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI ,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM
    subject Alan Jackson and Gianelli-Blogonaut: Do Not Destroy Any
    Communications Relating To These Matters

    cc: Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Agent Sopko – the Treasury Department

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    What’s wrong, Sydney? Nothing to post about on Blogonaut’s Phil Spector “watch?” Don’t worry – I’m certain Dennis Riordan (who Blogonaut-Gianelli calls “venerable” but also happens to speak for somehow – although he doesn’t know him but Mr. Riordan may have waved to him once) will file a magnificent appeal that many, many attorneys and lay people will want to read and study. I personally look forward to that.

    That’s correct. Each time I post the date and time is shown. Take the total number of words and figure in that I type 100 wpm and you will have the precise time I have spent addressing your lies, slander, defamation, libel, and fraudulent allegations. It’s very very simple math. I am intentionally creating a paper trail that documents precisely what is going on here and on other internet sites and via emails. Pay close attention to that, Sydney. I intend to use these documents in a court of law. I have already advised Phawker that I intend to subpoena the IP address information and have asked them to maintain that information. At that time, I will turn it over to Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agent Sopko – the Treasury, and the news media copied in on my public emails documenting the destruction of my life. I will also subpoena all communications between Gianelli-Blogonaut and the District Attorney of Los Angeles, Alan Jackson, Donna Clarkson and her legal team, Leonard Cohen and his advisers or friends, my so-called former friends, and others. Blogonaut-Gianelli is clear on this and should not attempt to destroy evidence.

    I am writing a book about Leonard Cohen. I am documenting your lies and slander on this Blog. You descended on this site and your motive is clearly to undermine my credibility and attack my children. I see that you’re frustrated that you can’t silence me.

    Kelley Lynch

    Sydney Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    Kelley, the length of time your are on-line with your nonsense rantings is indicated every time you post. Try to pay attention now – each time you post, the date and time of that post is shown. Can”t argue with that. You don’t have any power to secrete those numbers. You don’t seem to get that you leave a paper trail everywhere you go. Like I said earlier, if you don’t want people to comment about your posts, keep a secret journal of all this evidence you’re lying about. You can be assured that no one will bother you under those circumstances. No one will miss you…

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-213588

  418. Sydney Says:

    Put up or shut up Kelley.

  419. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney said…
    I have to admire a son who can display emotional detachment and at the same time display unconditional love. This may not be visible to others, but I can relate to his stand on neutrality. He clearly is commenting on the man and not the father; and for that to happen, acceptance of his father right or wrong is the best gift he can give to PS. I don’t pretend to know all the facts or rumors regarding this situation, but I find this letter touching.

    September 10, 2009 11:14 AM

    Sydney said…
    This really illustrates the concept that one can love someone completely, but dislike their behavior or way of life. If people could apply this, I suspect there would be fewer divorces and fewer runaways.

    September 10, 2009 1:30 PM

    Post a Comment On: Blogonaut
    “PHIL SPECTOR SON SAYS HOW HE FEELS ABOUT RACHELLE, BLOGONAUT”
    35 Comments –

    blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com

  420. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Getting anxious, Sydney? You are becoming increasingly aggressive – I note.

    Kelley Lynch

  421. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Well, Sydney, at least you admit that you don’t know any facts. You also have not reviewed the evidence I sent to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Would you like to publicly comment on why Agent Sopko and her partner told me, when we met, that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is reading my emails. That didn’t appear to be a game – to them – from what I could tell. Why would Agent Sopko, Intelligence at the U.S. Treasury Department – fly into Santa Ana, California to meet with me? Why did the Denver Duty Agent tell me to let the IRS take the lead and they would be brought in if there was criminal evidence or witness tampering? Any thoughts on that?

    Kelley Lynch

    P.S. I trust Janis Zavala Spector’s views on what occurred between Phil Spector, Ronnie Spector, and their children. Phil Spector is a wonderful Father. Leonard Cohen himself publicly noted that he was delightful with children. He has a wonderful daughter, Nicole Spector, who is evidence of her parents and how they raised her. And, they had a wonderful son and brother, Phillip, Jr. who I knew and loved. I do know the facts and I know that Phil and Janis Zavala Spector were wonderful to me when I was raising Rutger. I cherish that moment in time. That would have been from 1988-1989 (nearly full time) through around the time that Ray was born in 1992 – and then from time to time thereafter. They remain my dear friends and since you don’t know them you cannot speak for them. Janis Zavala Spector was convinced that Phillip would want to lend me money, if he could, to hire a custody lawyer. She knows him well enough to understand that in the middle of his murder trial insanity he would help another human being.

  422. Susanne Walsh Says:

    Yes, yes dream on Lynch, you will never subponea anybody, never sue anybody, never write a book or movie(Hollywood block buster oh give me a break) nobody cares about you and your twisted mind, and yes just today I receive three of your sick mails, I will return them to you .
    You are truely boring and malicious and plain disturbed, the good thing is that nobody even have to try to undermine your credibility, you do such a great job of that yourself.
    Yes I still believe none of the lawyers or “holy men” or public offices ever read any of your nut mails, I also believe Phil Spector would probably say “Kelley who?” if your name was mentioned to him, and yes I absolutely believe that you are very jeloux of the woman in Leonard Cohen life, you just did not meassure up, and it is to see why.

  423. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    From November 25, 2009 at 3:52 am through this morning, November 26, 2009 at 10:17 am we have now received a cumulative 96 emails from Kelley Lynch. (The emails briefly stopped between 2:01 am and 7:22 am this morning.

    These emails were also copied to the IRS, the Justice Department, agent Sopko, and others.

    This is in addition to the scores of posts on this site during the same time period.

    I would call that obsessed with Leonard Cohen.

    Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.

  424. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, you do not know me; you did not know Leonard Cohen for the 20 years I worked with him; you have not reviewed the evidence; you are not a citizen of the United States; you intuitively spoke for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan. I will indeed subpoena information and I will litigate these issues. I could care less if you or anyone believes that. I have spoken with attorneys about these matters and I am clear on the issues, statutes, laws, etc.

    I am writing a book presently on Leonard Cohen. It is irrelevant to me if you believe that or read it. I have spent nearly 20 years watching and observing this man and I see right through him. I know his children and to say I was “helpful” raising Lorca is true understatement. I fed her. She was at my house every night. I drove her to school. My step-daughter and nephew lived with her. My friends were her friends – for instance, Vajra Rich.

    Publicly post my emails. That will break the argument and will serve as conclusive evidence. I will concede the point when you have successfully proven it.

    How would you know if I’m credible or not? I’m an absolute stranger to you. Cohen himself told Betsy Superfon in the spring of 2005 that I am the love of his life. He also told her he was terrified and remorseful. Care to comment on that?

    Who cares what you believe? I see you are attempting to subtly insult Kyabje Thinley Norbu, the 17th Gyalwa Karmapa, the 14th Sharmapa and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche with your insulting “holy men” remark. I have noted (and captured the comments) that my friends and teachers were slandered on Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog and demeaned on Blogonaut-Gianelli’s Blog. And now you speak for Phil Spector. I think Mr. Spector himself should personally respond. If I need to subponena him (due to the fact that he’s in prison) I will do so.

    I think Leonard Cohen’s a perverted fraud, calculated liar, and talentless creep. I have felt this way for years. He is one of the greediest men I have ever met in my life. He is an ego maniac and control freak who orchestrates everything and is the driving force behind what has unfolded. I would have measured up if he had been able to coerce/bribe/blackmail me into accepting an illegal deal (such as his offer of 50% community property; $10,000/month “walking around money, etc.) and testified (perjured myself actually) that his advisers (some of whom are probably innocent of that allegation but should be permitted to testify to what they witnessed and what they think occurred) defrauded him.

    Do you know Anjani Thomas? I found her boring, talentless, over-inflated, unattractive, annoying, gossipy, uneducated, utterly ambitious, and dull. I know that she was able to get a house out of Cohen really quickly and I would assume that the people I gave my email passwords to (the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, etc.) have read her emails to me and are surprised that they are even together. Witnesses could not believe what she said publicly about Leonard Cohen. But since you probably don’t know her (and didn’t when I knew her) you can’t address these issues, can you? I also think she dresses slutty and think she’s really embarrassing. This is just truthful and I’ll get into more personal details in my book.

    Kelley Lynch

  425. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Actually, my emails to you are addressing your conduct which includes lying about me publicly; following me around the internet (look at the chronology of posts above as evidence of this), slandering me, and attempting to undermine my credibility. It’s bizarre behavior for someone who does not know me and it is utterly obsessive. A jury can and will draw their own conclusions. When you remove all posts about me on Blogonaut’s Blog and immediately cease and desist contacting me by email; contacting my son, sister, and brother-in-law by email, and publicly lying about me I will stop addressing these issues. I have been clear about this.

    You are correct: these emails are addressed to and copied to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko who you have insultingly referred to as my “pet.” What’s your point? That I reported Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and am now documenting the destruction of my life for them and others. They haven’t asked me to remove them from my emails and that includes Agent Kelly Sopko. Why would that be?

    I thought you were going to Sonoma for Thanksgiving – as you publicly noted earlier today? Are you so obsessed with me and this situation that you are at a Thanksgiving celebration with friends and on the internet following this insanity and lying? That’s truly incredible.

    You guarantee me that Leonard Cohen won’t be raised as an issue with Phil Spector? He appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine and I believe Mick Brown was truthful when he told me that Cohen testified against Phillip in the grand jury. Are you now speaking for Phil Spector? You know what Phil Spector plans to do, right? How? You do not know Phil Spector. Chris/Homeland Security (who I spoke with) was able to tell me that he thought the District Attorney and/or Governor’s Office was behind much of what I was going through – that included the SWAT Team and Killer King incident where I was questioned about Phil Spector. That entire file is, as you well know, falsified. Chris was a very professional, highly intelligent, and thoughtful individual and I was very very relieved to note that Homeland Security has employees like this. He was truthful, matter of fact, and seemed to know what he was talking about. You, on the other hand, sound like a pathetic liar who is obsessed with me, the Phil Spector matter, and all over the Cohen tax fraud matter. I’ll quote you to Mr. Spector. As I’ve said I am printing out this Blog and its contents and mailing it to Phillip.

    Kelley Lynch

    Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.

  426. Susanne Walsh Says:

    What happend to the two or three other books you have been threatening to write in the past few months? You better get started if you have to write all these books and movies and sue all these people, how do you have time to sit and “blog” all day

  427. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Obsessed All Right – He’s Weighing In (Apparently From His Friend’s House in Sonoma)

    from Kelley Lynch

    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity

    cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Paul Burger ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com

    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:16 PM
    subject Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Obsessed All Right – He’s Weighing In (Apparently From His Friend’s House in Sonoma)

    Hi Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    I agree with Gianelli-Blogonaut on this point: Phillip is going to win on appeal and that’s why everyone is so focused on me and my public comments. For the record, Gianelli-Blogonaut has publicly stated that Phillip will not address issues relating to me and/or Leonard Cohen in connection with his various matters. That is preposterous and absurd. Then again, Gianelli-Blogonaut is a liar with motive who has lied to the FBI, was in communication with Alan Jackson, was in communication with Leonard Cohen’s advisers, contacted Investigator Frayeh, seems to have information on how Pat Dixon feels about me, contacted Agent Sopko and Agent Wynar – no doubt in an attempt to determine what the IRS has planned in terms of a potential federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen. And, is dead set on undermining my credibility as a potential prominent government witness. Actually – Gianelli-Blogonaut stated that he guarantees I won’t be raised (and neither will Cohen) on appeal. First of all, how would he know. It’s speculative. Gianelli-Blogonaut now speaks for Phil Spector. That’s incredible.

    Love,
    Kelley

    “Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.”

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
    Actually, my emails to you are addressing your conduct which includes lying about me publicly; following me around the internet (look at the chronology of posts above as evidence of this), slandering me, and attempting to undermine my credibility. It’s bizarre behavior for someone who does not know me and it is utterly obsessive. A jury can and will draw their own conclusions. When you remove all posts about me on Blogonaut’s Blog and immediately cease and desist contacting me by email; contacting my son, sister, and brother-in-law by email, and publicly lying about me I will stop addressing these issues. I have been clear about this.

    You are correct: these emails are addressed to and copied to the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko who you have insultingly referred to as my “pet.” What’s your point? That I reported Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and am now documenting the destruction of my life for them and others. They haven’t asked me to remove them from my emails and that includes Agent Kelly Sopko. Why would that be?

    I thought you were going to Sonoma for Thanksgiving – as you publicly noted earlier today? Are you so obsessed with me and this situation that you are at a Thanksgiving celebration with friends and on the internet following this insanity and lying? That’s truly incredible.

    You guarantee me that Leonard Cohen won’t be raised as an issue with Phil Spector? He appears in the prosecution’s Motion in Limine and I believe Mick Brown was truthful when he told me that Cohen testified against Phillip in the grand jury. Are you now speaking for Phil Spector? You know what Phil Spector plans to do, right? How? You do not know Phil Spector. Chris/Homeland Security (who I spoke with) was able to tell me that he thought the District Attorney and/or Governor’s Office was behind much of what I was going through – that included the SWAT Team and Killer King incident where I was questioned about Phil Spector. That entire file is, as you well know, falsified. Chris was a very professional, highly intelligent, and thoughtful individual and I was very very relieved to note that Homeland Security has employees like this. He was truthful, matter of fact, and seemed to know what he was talking about. You, on the other hand, sound like a pathetic liar who is obsessed with me, the Phil Spector matter, and all over the Cohen tax fraud matter. I’ll quote you to Mr. Spector. As I’ve said I am printing out this Blog and its contents and mailing it to Phillip.

    Kelley Lynch

    Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    From November 25, 2009 at 3:52 am through this morning, November 26, 2009 at 10:17 am we have now received a cumulative 96 emails from Kelley Lynch. (The emails briefly stopped between 2:01 am and 7:22 am this morning.

    These emails were also copied to the IRS, the Justice Department, agent Sopko, and others.

    This is in addition to the scores of posts on this site during the same time period.

    I would call that obsessed with Leonard Cohen.

    Yes, Phil Spector is likely (in our opinion) to win a new trial on appeal. But we guarantee you that the words “Leonard Cohen” or “Kelley Lynch” or “set up” will not be in any of Spector’s briefs on appeal.

  428. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Walsh, you haven’t sent me the emails that you allege I copied you in on this morning. I have, however, forwarded this morning’s public emails to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Agent Sopko, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan – with a note that I didn’t think you were copied in but it needs to be double-checked.

    Well, let’s see, Walsh: I raised two children, ran two business, traveled on business, sponsored a Buddhist center for His Holiness Kusum Lingpa (for Oliver Stone), served on the Board of Director’s of two Boards – Orgyen Khachod Ling and Joshu Sasaki Roshi’s Rinzai Jr Board, did volunteer worked, oversaw the education of my children – including the teachers who taught my older son. I was careful to be certain to hire experts in their fields and he received a wonderful, broad, and classical education.

    I am looking for work, monitoring the slander, etc., tending to my life, and writing a book. Is writing a book a “threat?” I don’t need to get started – my book is well underway. I don’t sit and Blog all day and can do several things at once actually. I like to do one thing at a time when it’s extremely important – such as trapping liars.

    Kelley Lynch

    Susanne Walsh Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
    What happend to the two or three other books you have been threatening to write in the past few months? You better get started if you have to write all these books and movies and sue all these people, how do you have time to sit and “blog” all day

  429. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Correction: Oliver Stone and I sponsored Orgyen Khachod Ling for His Holiness Kusum Lingpa.

  430. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Note: It wasn’t 3:52 AM in my time zone. I was sleeping.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
    From November 25, 2009 at 3:52 am through this morning, November 26, 2009 at 10:17 am we have now received a cumulative 96 emails from Kelley Lynch. (The emails briefly stopped between 2:01 am and 7:22 am this morning.

  431. Kelley Lynch Says:

    On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    I used three phones in New Jersey – John Southard’s office phone; my cell phone on John Southard Jr’s account; and, John Southard, Jr’s cell phone.

    Why would I call Cohen from New Jersey when I had already addressed his perjured Declaration and fraudulent matter meant to silence me in my Motion to Quash raising all the issues I felt needed to be raised on the record? Where would Gianelli-Blogonaut get this information from? He has said he hasn’t communicated with Robert Kory and/or Michelle Rice. I also did not “flee” to New Jersey and that is a pompous, intentional remark. John Southard, Sr. gave me money for a plane ticket. They gave me a house to live in and hired me. I left when I thought His Holiness Kusum Lingpa was dying and issues arose with respect to Ray – in a conversation that John Southard, Jr. witnessed. Why would I flee? I was also quite public about my whereabouts.

    Just addressing every single lie and every single issue and allegation Gianelli-Blogonaut (and others) raise and have raised.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
    Moreover, if what you are saying was true, you would not have telephoned Cohen and left him voice messages when you initially fled to New Jersey after the September, 2008 civil harassment restraining order was issued.

  432. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    No matter–the point is that there was only a seven hour break between the emails–which spanned your entire waking hours.

    Nor do you deny sending us 96 emails in that compressed time period.

    That is not the behavior of a well person.

  433. Kelley Lynch Says:

    from Kelley Lynch

    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity

    cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Paul Burger ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI
    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:01 PM
    subject Re: I Don’t Recall Phoning Cohen From New Jersey

    P.S. I am convinced that the fraudulent restraining order matter opened statutes that some parties feel were closed. David Moorhead was convinced, after our discussion, that Robert Kory’s letters to him and Craig Blockwick (as well as Daniel Bergman’s threatening letter to Phil Shull that was sent to the FBI in Denver which caused Phil Shull to determine that I am the victim of “filthy lawyering) opened statutes as well. Gianelli-Blogonaut is clearly an idiot posing as a “lawyer.”

  434. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Keep count of how many emails and posts it has taken me to address your lies, slander, fraud, defamation of character, and attempts to undermine my credibliity as a a potential witness and/or human being and Mother. Pay careful attention to the fact that I am documenting all of your activity and intend to litigate these matters. Assume I won’t. Underestimate me. That is your problem – not mine. You are not going to have an opportunity to state at a later date that the truth was not brought to your attention. It has been, repeatedly – time and time again, ad nauseum. You are willfully overlooking facts, the truth, and you – not I – are harassing and stalking me.

    Stalking a stranger and lying about them publicly is truly abnormal behavior. Insulting Agent Sopko is shameless. Lying to the FBI is criminal. Contacting an investigator on Phil Spector’s matter is sinister. Communicating with Leonard Cohen’s advisers is also sinister. Targeting my son and attempting to intimidate him, my sister, and brother-in-law is outrageous and unconscionable. You are a pathelogical liar and I believe your motive is to derail or obstruct a potential federal criminal prosecution involving Leonard Cohen. Your emails/calls to Agent Wynar and Agent Sopko were, from my perspective, an attempt to determine what the IRS is doing.

    I was told, by Agent Sopko, that one thing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is doing is reading my emails. Were I them – I would charge you, arrest you, and prosecute you. I am, however, not a U.S. prosecutor. I will, nevertheless, litigate the civil issues that have arisen from your outlandish and shameful conduct. Rest assured of that.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
    No matter–the point is that there was only a seven hour break between the emails–which spanned your entire waking hours.

    Nor do you deny sending us 96 emails in that compressed time period.

    That is not the behavior of a well person.

  435. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “Phillip is going to win on appeal and that’s why everyone is so focused on me and my public comments.”

    Ms. Lynch, the only mind in which PS and KL’s legal fortuines are linked is yours.

    We well understand why: Spector has money and a lawyer and you don’t. Naturally, you would like to “share” a lawsuit–because you broke bread with Spector how many times and how many years ago? Such “dear” friends that you did not attend on day of pretrial procedings or of either trial to show your support, even though you were not working at the time?

    Some friend–which her hand out that is.

    You also made an ass out of yourself (again) by insisting to Spector’s FORMER criminal lawyer and his current appellate lawyer that the notion that you and/or Cohen are not a part of Spector’s appeal is “absurd”.

    But it is YOU that is absurd.

    The appeal will be confined to the 4 courners of the trial transcript and will focus primarily on the so called 1101 evidence, and not your nonsense about witness tampering or perjury during the grand jury proceedings.

  436. Kelly Green Says:

    Do you have to think of the bullshit you spew or does it just come to you naturally? Oh, if there were only a pooper scooper law for the internet. Then we could scoop up the crap you spew, put it on the compost heap then spread it in the spring.

    Kelley, the only thing the IRS, FBI, or any other agency will ever share with you is space on this earth—and perhaps they’re unhappy about sharing that much with you!

    Phil Spector doesn’t care a wit what others think of you. Most likely, you’re just providing entertainment—comic relief. The IRS staff reads your emails for entertainment purposes only. No one has to undermine your credibility, Kelley. Congratulations, you’ve done that all by yourself.

    Kelley, all your internet postings and emails indicate just one thing—your descent into utter madness and insanity. You foolishly, foolishly think your story will be a “Hollywood Blockbuster”. How much more embarrassment must you family endure? It’s unfortunate not one person cares about you enough or loves you enough to see to it you get professional help: but even family members have a breaking point.

  437. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Trust me Blogonaut-Gianelli – every word you utter matters because every word you have written about me is a lie and that includes your preposterous allegation to Agent Wynar/FBI that I am spamming Agent Sopko of the Treasury Department. As I said to Agent Wynar – this should have taken him three minutes to investigate and see through. In other words, you lied to the FBI, are no in position whatsoever to speak for Agent Sopko or the other federal agencies copied in on my emails, and that is criminal from what I can tell. But, you’re playing a game You are also in no position whatsoever to state publicly whether there is or is not a pending federal prosecution (relating to Leonard Cohen) or who the IRS and/or others will call as a witness. Furthermore, you have no authority – whatsoever – to speak for Phil Spector. I doubt Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg, and Dennis Riordan want you to speak on their behalf and I doubt they authorized that. As you’re a liar these men and agents will have to take the witness stand to testify to their version of events and can recount the conversations from their perspective. As I’ve stated, the FBI seems to record all conversations.

    Kelley Lynch

    from Kelley Lynch
    to doronweinberg ,
    Dennis ,
    “*irs. commissioner” ,
    ASKDOJ ,
    Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
    washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
    Jewel of Activity

    cc moseszzz@mztv.com,
    Paul Burger ,
    ajackson@da.lacounty.gov,
    dbergman@bergman-law.com,
    Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
    STEPHEN GIANELLI

    date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:12 PM
    subject Re: I Don’t Recall Phoning Cohen From New Jersey

    Agent Sopko,

    This man is positively deranged from what I can tell – but he knows precisely what he is doing and he’s gleefully witness tampering, attempting to obstruct justice, attempting to derail a probable/possible federal prosecution (of Cohen), and obviously stalking me and attempting to monitor my actions and whereabouts. The manaic has publicly stated that I’m in Mexico. You are well aware of where I am and who I am spending Thanksgiving with. Trust me – he emailed you and called Agent Wynar because he wants to know what’s going on with the IRS. That does not explain his contacts with Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, or Investigator Frayeh – now does it?

    All the best,
    Kelley

    On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the FBI and DOJ,

    The man who lied to Agent Wynar and is quoting him publicly is truly unstable – from what I can tell. He is a shameless, arrogant liar and does not know when to quit. I am concerned about his obsession and fixation with and on me, my children, my sister, and her husband. It is absolutely not normal conduct. The man does not know me.

    All the best,
    Kelley

  438. Kelly Green Says:

    “Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken – but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!

    You continue to drag as many people as you possibly can into your litigations issues: you childre, parent, sister; Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Ron Burkle, Mick Brown, David Moorhead, Ronald Mitchell, to name but just a few.

    “Oliver Stone is a friend of mine” Just how do you define the word friend, Kelley? Are your “friends” those to whom you’ve just waved at, those who exist in your fantasy land, imaginary friends, or are your friends those whom would die for you? Common sense would indicates most of your “friends” are, at best, fleeting acquaintances. Most likely, those to whom you refer to as “friends” have no idea who you are other than the psycho who stalks and spams them.

    And just who is David Moorhead. Good lord, Kelley, do you just throw names out there in hopes that others will be impressed? Junior Gotti ring a bell? If Moorhead was an important witness, why didn’t he testify at Spector’s trials?

    Who is Ronald Mitchell and why are you accusing him of murder? Did Mitchell try to help you at one time? Did you then turn on Mitchell and accuse him of murder? A sane person would have figured out that by now the BPD has completed and investigation into your fantasy murder allegations. Has Mitchell been arrested for murder? If Mitchell has not been arrested for murder, then stop with your slanderous and libelous allegations. Why is it necessary for your continuous and unrelenting character assassinations?

  439. Kelly Green Says:

    “Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken – but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!

  440. Kelly Green Says:

    Now, Kelley, this is truly amazing: “I’m not interested in Leonard Cohen and he can drop dead (literally) for all I care.” In light of your statement/pronouncement and if you’re truly not interested in Cohen and you don’t care about Cohen, then why do continue to stalk, harass, and threaten him?

    Wait just a minute. When I questioned your memory of the transport to “Killer King”, you corrected me and informed the blog world that you told the cops nothing. Are you now saying you did answer their questions? Wow, what a difference a day makes. And quit dragging Mick Brown into this. Either Cohen testified before the grand jury or he didn’t—just provide us with proof that he did or didn’t. If Mick Brown sent you emails regarding Cohen’s did he or didn’t he testify, you would have posted them by now. Leave Mick Brown out of this.

    Are you still asking us to believe Cohen offered you 50/50 community property? Try to remember, Kelley, with the exception of Cohen’s ability to perform, you stole every asset he had. Cohen had nothing to split with you. I suppose it’s possible, just possible, Cohen was hoping you would return 50% of what you stole from him.

  441. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I see you’re behaving in your usual crass and aggressive matter, Green. You actually seem more masculine than feminine but who knows for certain. What interest do you have in laws? You are slandering me and lying about me and you do not know me, have no facts – whatsoever (unless you’re Cohen or his advisers), and have not reviewed the evidence I’ve provided the IRS. Clearly you could care less about slander, defamation, libel, fraudulent allegations, and threats. There are laws that address these issues and I will be using those laws.

    Agent Sopko/Treasury Department shared this with me: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff is receiving my emails and letters and reading them. In fact, she informed me (or her partner did) that quite a number of people at the IRS are reading them. In any event, how would you know what the IRS, FBI, or any other agency will or won’t do?

    You’re speaking for Phil Spector now. I don’t think you are authorized to speak for Phil Spector and I think you are a liar. What kind of comic relief does Phil Spector have while in prison? Do you want to explain that to me? This is a crass, vile, and malicious game and I am convinced that you personally have “motive.”

    The IRS Commissioner’s Staff reads my emails for entertainment purposes only. I will quote you to them. In fact, I will share your post with them. Why would the IRS engage in frivolous conduct. That is not a logical, reasonable, or sound conclusion to draw. A logical, reasonable, rational, and sound conclusion to draw is that they took my allegations of Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal (and supported with tremendous evidence and recollections of what had gone one) seriously. Another logical, reasonable, rational, and sound conclusion is that there will be a federal prosecution. In fact, Ed Dean – Cohen’s own lawyer – felt that the IRS (from what I could tell) should go in after certain advisers as well. Dale Burgess, my former accountant and a former IRS agent, was convinced that Criminal Intelligence/IRS should be involved here. He is a witness and has examined a tremendous amount of evidence relative to Cohen’s Tax Fraud Matter. He witnessed Kory’s offer (on behalf of Cohen – to me) of 50% community property, $10,000/month walking around money, etc. and asked me to advise the IRS and Treasury that he would take the stand and testify to this.

    Kelley, all your internet postings and emails indicate just one thing—your descent into utter madness and insanity. You foolishly, foolishly think your story will be a “Hollywood Blockbuster”. How much more embarrassment must you family endure? It’s unfortunate not one person cares about you enough or loves you enough to see to it you get professional help: but even family members have a breaking point.

    If no one has to attempt to undermine my credibility – what are you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh, and others doing on this Blog? You are clearly lying and can never prevail in a court of law.

    Kelley Lynch

  442. Kelly Green Says:

    Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?

    While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!

  443. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Correction, make that 98 emails we received in the last 48 hours–including the last email from KL to the Comissioner of the IRS, agent Sokpo, Alan Jackson, former Spector attorey Weinberg, the Department of Justice–bringing the “important” news that Kelley Lynch disagrees with Kelley Green on Phawker!

  444. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    Oppps–we just deleted 20 emails…..

  445. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, I have said nothing whatsoever about “legal fortunes.” It’s a bizarre concept to me given the circumstances.

    How do you know if I have an attorney or not? You don’t know me. I don’t recall ever breaking bread with Mr. Spector. How would you know? You weren’t there, do not know me, and do not know Phil Spector. Why would I attend what I viewed as a set up? If Phil Spector wanted me there he would have contacted me and I would have been there. I have shown my support for Mr. Spector in other ways and you saw Bill Pavelic’s email to me about my efforts on Mr. Spector’s behalf. Bill Pavelic was Phil Spector’s investigator. You only quote Bill Pavelic and others when it is convenient and in an attempt to support your lies and slander. It’s none of your business who I hire as an attorney or how I pay for an attorney but I know you’re dying to find out.

    Actually, Gianelli-Blogonaut, I didn’t say it was “absurd” if I wasn’t part of an appeal. I’m not an appellate lawyer but Dennis Riordan, who was copied in on that email, is Phil Spector’s appellate lawyer. I believe Phil Spector and I have serious legal issues that will, in time, be raised in a court of law – possibly more than one. I have no idea if they will be raised on appeal. That’s Phil Spector and his lawyer’s business.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
    “Phillip is going to win on appeal and that’s why everyone is so focused on me and my public comments.”

    Ms. Lynch, the only mind in which PS and KL’s legal fortuines are linked is yours.

    We well understand why: Spector has money and a lawyer and you don’t. Naturally, you would like to “share” a lawsuit–because you broke bread with Spector how many times and how many years ago? Such “dear” friends that you did not attend on day of pretrial procedings or of either trial to show your support, even though you were not working at the time?

    I have no interest in your views on Phil Spector’s appeal on any legal issue. I think you’re a liar who has committed federal crimes and no one on earth is going to convince me otherwise. I believe you are intentionally witness tampering and attempting to derail and/or obstruct a possibly pending federal matter relating to Leonard Cohen. I am convinced you lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and I am convinced that you attempted to determine what was going on with Cohen’s tax matter (and the IRS) when you emailed Agent Sopko and contacted Agent Wynar. That does not explain your communications with Alan Jackson, Pat Dixon, and/or Leonard Cohen’s advisers.

    Kelley Lynch
    Some friend–which her hand out that is.

    You also made an ass out of yourself (again) by insisting to Spector’s FORMER criminal lawyer and his current appellate lawyer that the notion that you and/or Cohen are not a part of Spector’s appeal is “absurd”.

    But it is YOU that is absurd.

    The appeal will be confined to the 4 courners of the trial transcript and will focus primarily on the so called 1101 evidence, and not your nonsense about witness tampering or perjury during the grand jury proceedings.

  446. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I tend to doubt that.

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
    Oppps–we just deleted 20 emails…..

  447. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    “If no one has to attempt to undermine my credibility – what are you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh, and others doing on this Blog?”

    We are entertaining ourselves by trying to pin you down logically.

    Nor are we “lying” about the opinions expressed here.

    Nor do we need to “undermine” your credibility–anyone who sends 10 emails a day to the IRS, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and others–including on the subject of who they disagree with on various blogs–has no credibility.

    Everything you have done on-line for years says “nut job”.

  448. Kelley Lynch Says:

    You couldn’t pin me down logically, Gianelli-Blogonaut. You are an arrogant moron. I didn’t say you’re lying about opinions. I said you are lying about me and have targeted my son, sister, and her husband. Reead my posts and emails.

    I can assure you that I’m not emailing the IRS, DOJ, FBI, or Agent Sopko about people who annoy me or disagree wth me. I am emailng them because I believe this is an organized campaign of harassment and cyber-terrorism meant to silence me and undermine my credibility. I personally believe it is who is the laughing stock but happen to remain convinced that you are attempting to derail or obstruct a potential federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen. You are in no postion to say – one way or another – what is pending with the IRS but you have read my emails to them documenting what has gone on since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal.

    Care to explain why you lied to Agent Wynar/FBI and called the FBI about spamming the Treasury when you had Agent Sopko’s email address and contacted her directly? For the record, Agent Sopko has not advised me that I am “spamming” her. I do not know what authority you have to speak on her behalf and/or on behalf of the Treasury.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 6:49 pm
    “If no one has to attempt to undermine my credibility – what are you, Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh, and others doing on this Blog?”

    We are entertaining ourselves by trying to pin you down logically.

    Nor are we “lying” about the opinions expressed here.

    Nor do we need to “undermine” your credibility–anyone who sends 10 emails a day to the IRS, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and others–including on the subject of who they disagree with on various blogs–has no credibility.

    Everything you have done on-line for years says “nut job”.

  449. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S> If verything I’ve done on line for years says “nut job” – why areyou obsessed with me?

  450. Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    One can credibly argue (as we have) that Phillip Spector did not receive a fair trial. One can even credibly argue that Spector is innocent (although clearly the weight of public opinion is clearly to the contrary, and the first argument is likely to be more successful right now that the former one).

    But one cannot credibly argue that Phil Spector was “set up”—let alone for reasons relating to Leonard Cohen or Kelley Lynch. That (among many reasons) is why you have no credibility.

    As to why we care?

    a. You will not leave us alone b. we are facinated and horrified.

  451. Kelley Lynch Says:

    View it as a threat. That’s fine with me. I have every intention of relying on the justice system. Since you don’t know me and are not authorized to speak on my behalf you cannot say otherwise.

    I see right through you and your ongoing not-so-veiled threats.

    Leonard Cohen dragged Oliver Stone into this situation. Make no mistakes about it. Steven Segal is witness to a critical situation that I discussed with the Treasury Agents – as is Agent Bill Betzer. Ron Burkle authorized me to copy him in on my emails. Mr. Burkle is brilliant and has a legal team. I think he knows how to address matters. You obviously do not speak for Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, or Ron Burkle – do you? Mick Brown contacted me and we emailed extensively. He wrote me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector in the grand jury. Mick Brown is a journalist and our communications were not and are not “privileged” or confidetial. Ronald Mitchell inserted himeslf into this matter. His employee, who wtnessed certain things with Mitchell, felt his motive was liability. I think he’s in over his head but we shall see. You forot Dr. Dre and Mike Elizondo – who were dragged into this by Lindsey and Cohen. And, of course, Cloris Leachman who was at the bottom of the hill with my son Ray while Lindsey was witnessed lying to police officers on May 25, 2005. Since I was questioned about Phil Spector en route to King Drew immediately thereafter one can safely assume this is a deadly serious legal matter – particularly as the entire file is falsified. And, of course, while that was taking place Rutger was asked – by Lindsey – to go in and sign over my house to Cohen and/or Kory. Neal Greenberg raised, in his lawsuit against Cohen, this issue: that Cohen, Linsey, Kory, and Superfon “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. Obviously the situation is heavy and was dangerous.

    Figure out who David Moorhead is on your own. I don’t work for you. I am merely documenting your lies, slander, and attacks on my character. The same goes for Ronald Mitchell. Investigate this yourself. Actually, as a number of residents and employees know, John/Jeff alleged that he murdered a 15 year old. A police oficer I volunteered with at the Birds of Prey felt this had to be reported. Why would Mitchell be arrested for murder? He’s not the one who was going aroun saying he murdered someone. John/Jeff, as people witnessed, attempted to assault me and another young woman and was unstable, cheering on “Hitler” in the community rooms, and a real creep. John/Jeff should have thought about his “character” when he told so many people that he murdered a 15-year old. One person was concerned that John/Jeff nearly snapped in their presence. Boulder PD knows he crowd that frequents the Boulder Hostel or should They have a station next door and were there frequently enough.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
    “Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken – but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!

    You continue to drag as many people as you possibly can into your litigations issues: you childre, parent, sister; Oliver Stone, Steven Segal, Ron Burkle, Mick Brown, David Moorhead, Ronald Mitchell, to name but just a few.

    “Oliver Stone is a friend of mine” Just how do you define the word friend, Kelley? Are your “friends” those to whom you’ve just waved at, those who exist in your fantasy land, imaginary friends, or are your friends those whom would die for you? Common sense would indicates most of your “friends” are, at best, fleeting acquaintances. Most likely, those to whom you refer to as “friends” have no idea who you are other than the psycho who stalks and spams them.

    And just who is David Moorhead. Good lord, Kelley, do you just throw names out there in hopes that others will be impressed? Junior Gotti ring a bell? If Moorhead was an important witness, why didn’t he testify at Spector’s trials?

    Who is Ronald Mitchell and why are you accusing him of murder? Did Mitchell try to help you at one time? Did you then turn on Mitchell and accuse him of murder? A sane person would have figured out that by now the BPD has completed and investigation into your fantasy murder allegations. Has Mitchell been arrested for murder? If Mitchell has not been arrested for murder, then stop with your slanderous and libelous allegations. Why is it necessary for your continuous and unrelenting character assassinations?

  452. Kelley Lynch Says:

    How’s Thanksgiving with your friends, Gianelli-Blogonaut? I am completely uninterested in your opinions on Phil Spector’s legal isues. He has been represented by some of the greatest attorneys in this contry – as well as major forensic scientists (who wrote the textbooks in these fields) who concluded that Clarkson shot herself. Fortunately, public opinion does not arise with the Appellate Court but it did help to have so much gossip on the stand about Phillip – and on the internet.

    I think Phil Spector was set up. Many people feel the same way. I could care less what you think. And it appears to be dead obvious. Take a look at Paul Huebl’s Blog.

    No one is forcing you to come onto this Blog, read, and post- and no one is forcing you to lie, slander me, and/or attempt to undermine my credibility.

    Kelley Lynch

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
    One can credibly argue (as we have) that Phillip Spector did not receive a fair trial. One can even credibly argue that Spector is innocent (although clearly the weight of public opinion is clearly to the contrary, and the first argument is likely to be more successful right now that the former one).

    But one cannot credibly argue that Phil Spector was “set up”—let alone for reasons relating to Leonard Cohen or Kelley Lynch. That (among many reasons) is why you have no credibility.

    As to why we care?

    a. You will not leave us alone b. we are facinated and horrified.

  453. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Fascinated and horrified probably sums things up with you. Obsessed also works.

  454. Kelley Lynch Says:

    What order have I given “Alan Jackson” – the man Bruce Cutler called girlie and the man I view as a big phoney, tattle tale, and someone who should be investigated – by the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Immigration, DEA, Phillip’s legal team and possibly ohers.

    For the record, destruction of evidence is criminal. Jackson knows this.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
    Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?

    While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!

  455. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, remove Rutger and my sister and her husband from your emails. Your attempts to intimdate them and threaten them have failed but you are transparent.

    Kelley Lynch

  456. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: Remove Rutger From Your Emails Gianelli-Blogonaut – Alan Jackson Doesn’t Have To Save Evidence … Wouldn’t That Be Criminal?
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “STEPHEN GIANELLI”
    Cc: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, mpduke1@msn.com
    Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:34 PM

    P.S. Rutger has asked him to stop contacting him and to stop threatening him. Gianelli lied about the handbag and has lied non-stop about me. Rutger is aware that I am documenting the lies and slander. It is exhausting but I intend to litigate these issues.

    — On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Remove Rutger From Your Emails Gianelli-Blogonaut – Alan Jackson Doesn’t Have To Save Evidence … Wouldn’t That Be Criminal?
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “STEPHEN GIANELLI”
    Cc: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, mpduke1@msn.com
    Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:32 PM

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Gianelli, from my perspective, is attempting to intimidate Rutger. Kelly Green is now addressing Alan Jackson and possible destruction of evidence.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
    What order have I given “Alan Jackson” – the man Bruce Cutler called girlie and the man I view as a big phoney, tattle tale, and someone who should be investigated – by the IRS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury, Immigration, DEA, Phillip’s legal team and possibly ohers.
    For the record, destruction of evidence is criminal. Jackson knows this.
    Kelley Lynch
    Kelly Green Says:
    November 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
    Why would Alan Jackson or, for that matter, any sane person obey your order: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters. Just who do you think you are?
    While you may be insane, Kelley, you are, nonetheless, entertaining!

    — On Thu, 11/26/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:

    From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
    Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com
    Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 5:00 PM

    You wrote at 7:22 am to say: “I am now removing you from these emails”, but three minutes later you email me again! Do you have any idea how many emails you have sent to this account in the last 30 hours? More than 60!

    Do you know how many times you have written to deny that you ever owned a Birkin bag? Half a dozen.

    Give it a rest, Ms. Lynch. This is civil harassment plain and simple.

    On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    Just want you to be clear that I never owned a Birkin bag. My financial information, past or present, is none of your business.

    Kelley Lynch

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
    To: Kelley Lynch
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 2:21:32 PM
    Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim

    Ok, then what did youn pay for you Birken bag adn what do you claim your NM high balance was?

    On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    To the Department of Justice and FBI,

    Someone was apparently monitoring me in Santa Monica. I don’t think I was accessorized however. According to this nut, Birkin bags are never priced under $30,000 and never go on sale. I just googled them and there are three, listed below, under $30,000.

    You don’t think he’s attempting to witness tamper, do you?

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
    Uh, Ms: Lynch: there are purchase records and other proof involved.
    Let’s just say that 1. Your Neiman Marcus account records speak for iteself and 2. You were the best accessorized person to habitually sleep on the beach in Santa Monica following the eviction from your luxury home.
    Nor (we note) do you deny owing a Birkin bag, nor is there any such thing as a Birkin bag priced under $30,000. (They never go on sale, and there is a long waiting list.)

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
    Gianelli-Blogonaut, there are purchase records and I can assure you that my credit card records are none of your business or anyone else’s for that matter. There is, however, no proof that I bought a $30,000 Birkin bag because I did not.
    Let’s say that you can never subpoena my Neiman Marcus records because you don’t know me and are now, an absolute stranger, interested in my credit card records. Ok. How would you konw how I looked in Santa Monica or how I accessorized myself? I know Peter/Jacob Falconey – who impersonated a federal agent – was stalking me there and reported one incident to Santa Monica PD. The field report of that incident exists.
    I absolutely deny ever owning a Birkin bag. I just googled Birkin bag and immediately turned up three under $30,000.
    Kelley Lynch
    Hermes Birkin bag
    $2,750.00 new – eCRATER – vivelarose
    Parchemin Clemence & Gold 35cm Hermes Birkin Bag
    $15,403.70 new – eCRATER …
    Hermes Tan Gold 35CM Birkin Bag Togo Leather
    $1,350.00 new – Sacs En Ligne
    How To Buy A Birkin Bag

    ——————————————————————————–

    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane

    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:52:52 PM
    Subject: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
    Gianelli-Blogonaut, you’ve lied about the Birkin bag. I never owned one and never would actually. I preferred more reasonable designers – such as Michael Kors. You must have this story confused with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg she spent $30,000 at Neiman’s. My house was modest and my lifestyle was modest.
    I haven’t “reported” you to Agent Sopko. I’ve asked her to confirm and validate your comments about what she told you. I have already asked the IRS, DOJ, Tresaury, and FBI to investigate whether or not you are attempting to obstruct justice, sabatage an IRS criminal prosecution (that may be pending), witness tampering, etc. Whether they do is up to them.
    I know you think this is fun and exciting – inserting yourself into a deadly serious tax matter and Phil Spector’s set up; insulting federal agents; lying to the FBI; contacting Investigator Frayeh; etc. Your emails and posts of yesterday are evidence that you are arrogant, harassing me, and out of your mind from what I can tell.
    I cannot threaten criminal prosecution. I am not a criminal prosecutor or attorney as I’ve repeatedly stated. The “feds” should know, better than I, what is and/or is not a crime. I do not, however, refer to the parties copied in as “the feds” because I am not crass and I am not playing deadly games with them. You are not my victim. You had Joff Belark target me and he wrote one long lie that you posted as an article. No one forced you to descend onto this Blog and lie about me publicly, slander me, threaten my son, and raise fraudulent allegations. You yourself came to this Blog and, from my perspective, your sole motive is to undermine my credibility as a potential “prominent goverment witness” and to sabatage any pending IRS prosecution of Leonard Cohen and others. That’s my opinion. I have no idea how the “United States” investigates, arrests, and prosecutes anyone. I asked the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Treasury to investigate you. Whether or not they arrest and prosecute you, Cohen, and others remains to be seen.
    Kelley Lynch

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:45:56 PM
    Subject: Gianelli The Arrogant Weighs In Again

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
    OOOOH–You have reported us for the sixth hundredth time[?] to Agent Sopko.
    We are shaking in our boots, ooooooh!
    Ps: Kelley Lynch: You serially threaten criminal prosecution by posting and CCing your victims with threats to report their alleged “cimes” to the “feds” (aa you like o put it), and by posting and copying your victims with emails to Agent Sopko (and many other law enforcers) askiing that your victims be “investigated”. “arrested”, and “prosecued” by the United States.

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:43:48 PM
    Subject: Re: Ron’s House In La Jolla Is Drop Dead Gorgeous Also

    P.S. I heard Lindsey’s living nicely in Cold Water Canyon. Not sure where he gets his money. He always borrowed money from me and never repaid it or child support. He did not support his child. He drove a Lexus or Jaguar. I kept my Landcruiser for 10 years until it was fully paid off. Lindsey took it and was going to pay me $14,000 for it. I guess he stole it. I just mentioned to Rutger the other night (who is suffering financially) that Lindsey has my juke box. He stole that also. His gambling habit didn’t help.

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:42:16 PM
    Subject: Ron’s House In La Jolla Is Drop Dead Gorgeous Also

    Hi Thinley Norbu Rinpoche,

    You should see Ron’s house in La Jolla. It’s drop dead gorgeous. Having said that – Ron lives a relatively modest life from what I noticed. I was frequently at his house. His former secret service agent, Frank, didn’t appear to view me as a threat.

    Love,
    Kelley

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:40:59 PM
    Subject: Blogonaut – Ron Burkle Has A $30 Million Dollar House And Great Cars

    Hi Gianelli-Blogonaut,

    Ron Burkle has an amazing and historic house. He knows the property values in the Los Angeles area. And, his son spent countless hours with me and at my modest home.

    You are and always will be a liar who has targeted me. Alan Jackson deserves you and Michelle Blaine.

    Kelley Lynch

    ——————————————————————————–

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:37:15 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    P.S. Lindsey did give me a $1,000 Louis Vuitton backpack that I used for approximately 10 years. And the travel case that I pawned after Cohen and Lindsey destroyed my life because I had the nerve to report Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Patrick at the Santa Monica pawn shop, who noted that Starving Stupids destroyed everything in storage, will recall this. He should also remember that I gave him a Phil Spector jacket which he loved.

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:35:36 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    Hi Agent Sopko,

    I think Birkin bags are tacky. I preferred other less expensive designers. More reasonable bags – maybe $200 or so. I didn’t even own a piece of jewelry worth $30,000 so these people are out of their minds.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:34:43 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    P.S. I hate Birkin bags. They make me think of the billoinare twins who Rutger went to camp with.

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:33:54 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Please review my tax returns. You will note that I withdrew money from my retirement account and paid for my house. I bought my parents condominium with a commissoin I received. I did not do volunteer work for Cohen but felt I was really his slave.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:32:35 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    Hello Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    Gianelli-Blogonaut and the liars are never going to prove that I owned a $30,000 Birkin bag or a $1,000 Birkin bag for that matter. They must have me confused with Paris Hilton or Anjani Thomas. I suppose Gianelli-Blogonaut is confusing this with the fact that Betsy Superfon told Neal Greenberg that she spent $30,000 at Neiman Marcus. She thought that’s where this garbage gossip arose from.

    My house was modest and guess who is a witness to that fact? Phil Spector. Phillip, however, happened to like my house very very much although it certainly wasn’t as large and/or as glamorous and my neighbors – Susan Lord and Steven Segal. I closed my retirement account, paid the taxes on my IRA withdrawal, and put a downpayment on a very nice, very simple house that was Rutger, Ray and my home.

    Are they attempting to turn me into a Hollywood starlett type? I didn’t even go out and no one will ever be able to prove that I did – except for lunches with Cohen or my Mother; shopping or the doctor’s office with the children; carpooling; volunteer work; and – of course – the House of Blues and the restaurant with Harry Dean Stanton with Phillip. I also attended some Grammy parties – on official business because I do not like large events and am not particularly social. His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, Yongzin Rinpoche, Choegon Rinpoche, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, Lingtrul Rinpoche, Chagdud Rinpoche, and many other lamas would frequently visit me and oftentimes stay with me – for months at a time. Yongzin Rinpoche actually lived in my small guest house for a while. And, of course, Gesar Mukpo (my nephew through marriage to Douglas Penick – who was married to Trungpa Rinpoche’s sister-in-law regardless of what Bergman was attempting to prove in Court – that Gesar’s not my nephew) lived with me on Keniston Avenue and Mandeville Canyon.

    I’m clear about Gianelli-Blogonaut’s motive, are you?

    Love,
    Kelley

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Cc: dbergman@bergman-law.com; ajackson@da.lacounty.gov; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:25:48 PM
    Subject: Re: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    To the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,

    Blogonaut-Gianelli is interested in my Neiman’s account. Why? Am I married to this deranged madman? I never owned a Hermes Birkin bag and I have never in my life paid anything like that for a handbag. It is an absurd and preposterous allegation and it is a lie. Of course, as usual, Gianelli-Blogonaut will never be able to prove that lie. In any event, the burden of proof is now on Gianelli-Blogonaut. This will be an impossible feat for this liar to prove.

    Actually, the Governor lived on Mandeville Canyon Road and the homes are often priced between $25-30 million. I bought my house for approximately $700,000 which was a steal. My Father and I almost single-handledly renovated the house. It was worth $1.8 million when I lost it due to various unfortunate circumstances – including the fact that the potential buyer wanted to give me $200,000 in cash (and an apartment) under the table and did not want to have a written agreement. I did not trust that type of deal although I was assured by him and Wendi Knaak that it was a valid deal. I believe I said my lifestyle was modest. My home was modest. The property values are high.

    Gianelli-Blogonaut, as always, does not pay attention to details.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
    “I didn’t live a high lifestyle.”
    Excuse us, Ms. Lynch, it must have been someone else with the $70,000 balance on their Neiman Marcus account and who owned (among other luxuries) a $30,000 Hermès Birkin bag.
    And it must have been someone else who posted above as Kelley Lynch to admit to living in a $1.8 MILLION home with a pool in an exclusive Los Angeles neighborhood.
    For give us, but that fact that you believe that a $1.8 million home is not that extravagant PROVES that you were indeed living la dolce vita.
    You see, Ms. Lynch we do pay attention to “details”—and we remember them too.

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:20:18 PM
    Subject: I Have Not Threatened Gianelli-Blogonaut With Criminal Prosecution – He’s A Liar

    Agent Sopko,

    I want you to read Blogonaut-Gianelli’s public post from Phawker.com (and below). You told Gianelli-Blogonaut thta “a reasonable person would not find” me “credible” so “Blogonaut-Gianelli” should “not be too concerned about” my posts. Right, Agent Sopko? This is, no doubt, verbatim. The Treasury, according to Gianelli-Blogonaut, told him in so many words (which I would like him to repeat verbatim in quotes), that the Treasury does ont believe he is attempting to obstruct justice or witness tampering? Would you mind confirming that for me. There is nothing on Phawker’s Blog or in Gianelli-Blogonaut’s action that can be construed as “common sense.” I did not initiate a “chat room.” I responded to an article Phawker posted about Cohen where I believed I was slandered. Gianelli-Blogonaut, Sydney, Susanne Walsh (all affiliated with Blogonaut’s garbage site) and others descended and targeted me and have lied and slandered me. I suppose you support that also, correct? I haven’t said that what Gianelli-Blogonaut is now defining as a “federal crime” is a federal crime. He is twisting the words – clearly documented on this Blog – and putting words in my mouth. I have no idea what his stupid remark about giving testimony in a paternity matter has to do with anything.

    Perhaps you would also like to explain, for me, how I could threaten criminal prosecution. Do you see me working for the IRS, DOJ, FBI and/or Treasury as a prosecutor? Am I a attorney? Then how could I threaten criminal prosecution? I have reported what I was told is criminal tax fraud and absolutely believe Gianelli-Blogonaut is willfully witness tampering, threatening my son, monitoring my actions, stalking, participating in cyber-terrorism, retaliating against witnesses, raising false allegations about me, accusing me and Rutger of things we have not done, etc.

    I have never frivolously requested an investigation into anyone who annoys me. I think Susanne Walsh is a complete lunatic and malicious woman but am convinced that she is merely a Cohen cult victim and her opinions do not interest me. Her vicious comments about Rutger prove, to me, that I am dealing with people who behave unconscionable and are capable of anything. I, do, however, think Kelly Green, Another Kelly Lynch Victim, and others on Phawker’s Blog should be investigated. Not because they annoy me. Because I believe they have motive to undermine a potential “prominent government witness” and sabatage a pending IRS criminal prosecution. I am assuming, based on Gianelli-Blogonaut’s remarks, that the Treasury is now attempting to undermine any potential IRS matter – as is Agent Wynar/FBI who seems to have told Gianelli-Blogonaut that I am a 5150 candidate and will have to testify to that on the stand and back it up with facts which isn’t going to happen.

    Kelley Lynch

    ——————————————————————————–
    From: Kelley Lynch
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com; Dennis@riordan-horgan.com; *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov; ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; STEPHEN GIANELLI ; Blogonaut Law-Blog ; Jewel of Activity ; Thaye Dorje ; “YesheRimpoche@aol.com” ; rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan ; moseszzz@mztv.com; m.j. smith ; Duane
    Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 12:08:44 PM
    Subject:

    Blogonaut Law Blog Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
    “It’s very obvious and very straightforward. Are you telling me that Agent Sopko has confirmed that the Treasury does not believe you are attempting to obstruct justice or witness tamper?”
    In so many words, yes.
    But it is also a matter of common sense that joining in an internet chat board discussion initiated by the alleged “victim” and posting opinions that her alleged civil lawsuits are not viable and the poster is not credible is not a federal crime, let alone “witness tampering”. (Nor, BTW, is giving testimony in a paternity, or any other, matter.)
    Agent Sopko also told us that a reasonable person would not find you credible so we would not be too concerned about your disparaging blog posts and your threats of criminal prosecution.
    We say “your” agent Sopko because she is the person at the Department of the Treasury that you write daily (sometimes 10 times daily) to demand the prosecution of just about everyone who annoys you on the internet.

  457. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , “STEPHEN GIANELLI”
    Cc: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, blogonaut.law.blog@gmail.com, governor@governor.ca.gov, Governor.ritter@state.co.us, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, “Maurice Smith” , moseszzz@mztv.com, mpduke1@msn.com
    Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:36 PM

    Mr. Weinberg and Mr. Riordan,

    The situation with Gianelli-Blogonaut attempting to threaten and/or intimidate Rutger is outlandish and outrageous.

    Love,
    Kelley

    cc: IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko – Treasury: the man is dangerously obsessed now.

  458. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Make no mistakes about this, Green – the justice system was set up to frame innocent people. You are harassing me and I see right through you.

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
    “Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken – but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass others. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!

  459. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Thu, 11/26/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Rutger -These People Are Now Desperate. Stay Wide Awake About Their Motives
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com, “STEPHEN GIANELLI” , “Blogonaut” , ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
    Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 11:58 PM

    Rutger,

    I am convinced this is criminal harassment. And much much more.

    Love,
    Mother

    — On Thu, 11/26/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:

    From: STEPHEN GIANELLI
    Subject: Re: Gianelli Follows Me Around The Internet, To Phawker’s Blog Specifically In This Instance, And Thinks He’s My Victim
    To: “Kelley Lynch” , “Kelley Lynch” , “Rutger Penick” , info@softwheresolutions.com
    Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 5:00 PM

    You wrote at 7:22 am to say: “I am now removing you from these emails”, but three minutes later you email me again! Do you have any idea how many emails you have sent to this account in the last 30 hours? More than 60!

    Do you know how many times you have written to deny that you ever owned a Birkin bag? Half a dozen.

    Give it a rest, Ms. Lynch. This is civil harassment plain and simple.

  460. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sunday, May 31, 2009
    Phil Spector Was Railroaded In A Legal Outrage

    Los Angeles, CA—Judge Larry Paul Fiddler seemed like such a personable fellow when I met him in San Francisco at a function hosted by the Investigative Reporters and Editors some six years ago. First impressions are sometimes misleading.

    Fidler had the duty to give murder suspects a fair trial under our sacred system of justice. When legendary record producer Phil Spector’s murder case came before Judge Fidler, fairness was replaced by judicial tyranny.

    Fidler consistently ruled for nearly every request by prosecutors while denying nearly everything for Spector’s defense. Fidler was more biased than any judge I’ve seen in some 40 years.

    Fidler was out to prove that a celebrity could get convicted after a stunning series of acquittals of other accused Hollywood notables.

    Fidler was asked repeatedly to recuse himself and when he refused the defense went as far as the Court of Appeals and lost the argument.

    The real abuse of judicial discretion was surrounding the newly revised California’s evidence code 1101B that could allow the introduction of so-called prior bad acts committed by the defendant.

    Fidler allowed a string of women jilted by Spector to come into court and accuse Spector of whatever they wanted. Allegations surfaced that were never reported to police and there was never a prosecution or trial to sort out fact from fiction. The tales were decades old and the women telling them were felons, freeloaders and even sold their stories to the tabloids.

    As for the evidence or rather a lack of it, the jury was allowed to be tainted by a very public hate campaign often centering on the aging Spector or his appearance.

    The case was far more about salacious gossip than facts. The pretty dead woman, Lana Clarkson was painted as saintly or angelic. The truth was that she was a troubled alcohol and drug addicted woman who stole from her friends and lived under a cloud of poverty and depression.

    The prosecutors took steps to cover up Clarkson’s real problems by asking the Los Angeles County Medical Examiners to not conduct the normal psychological autopsy done in such cases. This obstruction of justice was criminal to say the least.

    The prosecution made a, Motion to Fix and Judge Filer sustained that motion. The jury was swayed by the avalanche of what should have been inadmissible garbage rather than evidence. The result was a miscarriage of justice.

    Lana Clarkson died at her own hands while heavily intoxicated.

    Now Phil Spector can watch the Clarkson family loot his estate as he rots in a prison cell for a year or few until his case is reviewed by a higher court.
    Posted by Crimefile at 5/31/2009 09:12:00 AM

    Labels: Crime Courts-justice, Spector

  461. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Tuesday, April 14, 2009
    Spector Verdict Is An Injustice
    Los Angeles, CA—Legendary record producer Phil Spector should have never been arrested. Spector was arrested, tried and put through two trials that were unfair and un-American.

    The most outrageous departure from fairness was the introduction of evidence of some failed relationships spanning 30 years. Recently in California lazy prosecutors created a voter proposition that would allow them to bring up uncharged or proven past allegations. I say lazy because this made convicting people including innocents a lot easier.

    In Spector’s case the allegations were actually outside that proposition that became law. Most states would never allow that kind of gossip to taint a defendant’s trial.

    The accusations against Spector should have stood or fallen on the scientific evidence alone. The jury was heavily influenced by gossip and hate rather than evidence.

    The jury in this high-profile case should have been sequestered because of the media interest and thousands of pages of material posted on the internet most of which is inaccurate or worse. Jurors cannot be trusted to discontinue their Internet use while assigned to their duties. A Google search of Phil Spector and murder provided these results: “Results 1 – 50 of about 431,000 for Phil Spector Murder. (0.34 seconds)”

    Judge Larry Paul Fidler took the prosecution’s side from the very beginning of the case, ruling for them on nearly every point raised during the pendency of the case.

    This kind of injustice rarely gets anyone’s attention until they or a loved one is suddenly on trial.

    I’m confident that Phil Spector’s conviction and sentence will be overturned. I’m not so confident that Phil Spector will survive long enough for the legal reviews of these serious issues.

    In the mean time we can count on Lana Clarkson’s mother to use this conviction to her advantage in a civil court to loot Phil Spector’s sizable estate.

  462. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Thursday, April 09, 2009
    Spector Jury on another misconduct opportunity Holiday!

    Los Angeles, CA—The jury in the retrial of music legend Phil Spector must need more time to catch up on their Internet surfing of Spector related websites. This time it’s a woman juror who reportedly complained of illness and the jury was sent home.

    Reportedly the ill juror will call in the morning and provide an update on her condition. Depending on the report the jury may return to deliberate only for a half day because of Good Friday.

    In any event the jury deliberations will continue on Monday. I know they found the Clarkson family hate blogger’s site, now perhaps they can find mine, for another point of view.

    Update: As of 8:35 AM Friday, the ill juror is on the mend and deliberations will resume at least for a half-day.

  463. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Thursday, April 02, 2009
    The Phil Spector Jury Gets More Time To Engage In Misconduct
    Los Angeles, CA–The Phil Spector murder trial jury returned to a four-day holiday only to deliberate a half day yesterday and they have been released by Judge Larry Paul Fidler until Monday. One juror claims to be ill and instead of replacing him with an alternate juror they have been sent home.

    Will those jurors be able to stay away from the Internet? Will they be able to avoid the loads of published material that has been ruled off limits for the trial? I say there is no chance in Hell that will be the case.

    Judge Fidler is doing all he can to taint this jury into convicting Phil Spector. Letting this jury to avoid timely deliberations can only work against Phil Spector and his right to a fair trial.

  464. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sunday, March 29, 2009
    Lana Clarkson’s Life and Death OnThe Boulevard Of Broken Dreams
    Venice, CA—In a tiny cottage here lived Lana Clarkson. She was a great looking glamorous lady. She sought work as an actress/entertainer with limited success. In Hollywood you either have an agent or you are unemployed. Agents are difficult to obtain even for very talented people. Clarkson needed an agent.

    Lana Clarkson was not particularly talented but talent is not a requirement to make it in this town if you have the looks. There is no formula, but getting famous before your famous helps a lot. Hollywood was the birthplace of the publicity stunt. The trick is to pull one off without getting arrested. Actress and comedienne, Carol Channing was always a champ of the PR stunts.

    Lana Clarkson had one B-movie, starring role and little to brag about or more importantly, pay the rent. I know many like Lana here in L.A. that are emotionally hurting while waiting to fulfill a dream.

    Hollywood is unforgiving about age. For women it is doubly true. Clarkson turned 40, a milestone of old age for any actress. For an actress that has not achieved the desired career it is devastating.

    Clarkson had another problem that destroyed her hope and that was a horrible fall that fractured both of her wrists crippling her for months in the recent time frame before her tragic death.

    Lana became dependent upon pain killers for her emotional pain as well as the physical pain. Alcohol was also a big problem but still Clarkson tried to cope in an untenable situation.

    Clarkson was forced to take a minimum wage job serving the people that she hoped were her peers. The earnings for that job were insufficient to pay for her cottage, a car with insurance, her utilities, food and her Vicadin addiction.

    Clarkson had the looks and appeal to be a great porn star but sidestepped that temptation. That to me shows she was making a better choice.

    Her job as a hostess at the House of Blues put her face to face with aging music legend Phil Spector. Clarkson did not know Phil Spector, but joined him at his home after work. I’m convinced this was an opportunity to supplement her income with a low profile act of prostitution. There’s no question Clarkson needed any money she could get.

    I don’t condemn Clarkson for doing what she had to do in order to try and survive. It should have never been a matter for public consumption. Hollywood is full of part-time hookers that later became stars. Many wanted to be stars but wound up as hookers and porn stars instead.

    There are other unflattering things that came out about Clarkson. She often raided medicine cabinets of her friends in search of drugs for her addiction. She swindled several friends out of as much as $60,000.00 to finance a vanity film she wanted to use as a demo to showcase her act. The demo tape was an entertainment disaster. I’m sure she expected her stalled career to move and she’d pay back her friends in full. It just did not happen.

    Clarkson’s hopes and dreams evaporated. A 40 year old woman with no marketable skills was out of luck and money. That left her even more despondent and hurting. This is incredibly sad but often repeated scenario in Hollywood. If someone could have whispered to Clarkson before she left school, “Lana, don’t quit, stay in school.” Maybe there would have been a much better ending.

    While very drunk in Spector’s home Clarkson found a gun. I’m convinced horseplay began and an accident or suicide resulted. There were no witnesses. People are left to guess, speculate or wonder what really happened.

    Found by police on a sink, were a pair of false eyelashes. On Phil Spector’s Scrotum Saliva belong to Clarkson was found. On one of Clarkson’s breasts Spector’s Saliva was found. This supports the prostitution angle since she was a stranger to Phil Spector.

    Clarkson’s friends and family have been in immense pain. They blame the record producer just because he’s an easy target. The evidence for murder or manslaughter is just not there. Lana Clarkson is not coming back. She’s dead.

    I grieve for Clarkson’s mother and sister. They did not deserve their loss. There is nothing for them to do but move on and make the best of their lives. We are all in this together and none of us will be leaving this world alive.

    I hope people can still smile about some good times with Lana Clarkson. I’m sure there must be some great memories.

    Clarkson should live on in an image she created of the hopeful starlet that had beauty and worth even though she was never properly recognized on the Boulevard of Broken Dreams.

  465. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Monday, September 03, 2007
    The Phil Spector Trial Through The Eyes And Ears Of Linda Deutsch
    In Los Angeles there is the undisputed Queen of court journalism. She is the above all, copiously objective and avoids commentary on the cases she reports. She’s sharp as a tack and fair until it hurts.

    I was blessed to be able to chat with this master wordsmith over a short lunch during the Robert Blake murder trial and learned a bit about Ms. Deutsch. I already knew she has a warehouse full of awards for her writings over the years.

    Ms. Deutsch told me about her policy never to take sides or dare predict the too often unpredictable verdicts of the trials she’s assigned to cover. When you inquire about a story this gal is covering you never have to say, “Just the facts ma’am.”

    Columnists and commentators are the ones that give their opinions to the masses. Reporters on the other hand are given the task to simply report the naked truth. Few reporters can mask their personal opinions and tell it like it is as Linda Deutsch does so well.

    Here is a shot biography of Linda Deutsch:
    Ms. Deutsch has been a special correspondent for the Associated Press in Los Angeles, California since 1967. She has been a journalist for 40 years reporting on many high profile trials including the criminal and civil trial of O.J. Simpson, for which she was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize and awarded the Oliver Gramling award by the Associated Press. Ms. Deutsch covered the trials of Exxon Valdez skipper Joseph Hazelwood, Rodney King, the Menendez brothers, and of Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski. She has also covered Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, the assassination attempts on President Gerald Ford, and the evacuation of Vietnam after the fall of Saigon. She received her bachelor’s degree from Monmouth University in New Jersey. Ms. Deutsch has received many awards including the Missouri School of Journalism’s Honor Medal for Distinguished Service in Journalism and the Society of Professional Journalists’ First Amendment Award.

    For the past four years Linda Deutsch has doggedly covered the Phil Spector case. She has reported on the good, bad and the ugly of this sordid tale. I think this time Ms. Deutsch’s brutal honesty has tipped her hand when She called the case an “intriguing murder mystery”. That tells me above all else, that the state was unable to prove their case

    Here is Linda Deutsch’s wrap story on the end of the evidentiary portion of the Phil Spector murder trial.

  466. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Tuesday, July 17, 2007
    Prosecutor Alan Jackson Is A Jackass
    Irene Elizabeth Laughlin has the unusual alias of “Punkin Pie” She was Lana Clarkson’s very best Friend until her tragic apparent suicide at record producer Phil Spector’s home four years ago.

    Laughlin was called to testify as a defense witness to shed light on Clarkson’s state of mind before her death. Clarkson confided her hopes, dreams and failures, for years along with suicidal thoughts to Laughlin during the period just before her life ended.

    Laughlin has a heavy burden to deal with, and that’s the guilt of perhaps not having done enough to see that Clarkson got help from mental health professionals and instead tried to cheer up her profoundly depressed friend herself. That obviously did not work and Clarkson died.

    Laughlin’s testimony also revealed that the Clarkson family lawyer and others essentially tampered with a witness (Laughlin) in a criminal investigation by telling Laughlin to withhold information about Clarkson’s suicidal thoughts. That may have been what caused the cops to go after Spector since everyone close to Clarkson tried to paint a Clarkson as a happy and hopeful women who’d never kill herself. That effort nearly worked until Laughlin could no longer live with that deception and came clean with Spector’s defense tem after they contacted and interviewed her.

    Was there a motive to place the blame on the wealthy Phil Spector to collect money from him by those trying to cover up Clarkson’s alcoholism, drug use, depression and suicidal remarks? One could also argue that the cover-up was done to protect Clarkson’s public persona and memory.

    Now comes prosecutor Alan Jackson, angry that his case for murder is flushing down the toilet as the truth surfaces during the trial. Jackson spent the day degrading Laughlin and accusing her of making her testimony up for a book deal that never existed. Jackson continually tortured the witness by rubbing her face into her failure to make an effort to notify authorities about Clarkson’s mental state to gain some sort of professional intervention.

    It was laughable when Jackson tried to suggest that a crappy $9.00 an hour job at the House of Blues was somehow a wonderful and uplifting professional move for the 40 year-old Clarkson who spent her entire adult life trying to get her entertainment career of the ground.

    Jackson came off as the Jackass of the trial by his behavior against this grieving witness.

  467. Sydney Says:

    Oh dear, my friends, Kelley seems to be at a loss for words. She is now posting things written 6 or more months ago. Perhaps she will just get tired and go to bed. Perhaps, she will stay there for, say, 6 months and give us all a break.

  468. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Oh Me, Oh My. I’m posting credible and extremely relevant arguments made Paul Huebl – including on entitiled “Alan Jackson’s A Jackass.” I thought Gianelli-Blogonaut might find Paul as convincing as I did.

  469. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Credible and relevant arguments made “by” Paul Hubel. It doesn’t matter that they were made 6 months ago. They are valid. You aren’t being forced to visit this Blog, insult, and slander me, are you Sydney? I thought not.

  470. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Correction: The justice system was not set up to frame innocent people. If Phil Spector is inncent that is a valid basis for arguing that charges should never have been brought, etc. Why should I be careful what I “wsh” for Green – you’re not granting the wishes, are you? You are, however – to me, a moron.

    Kelley Lynch Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
    Make no mistakes about this, Green – the justice system was set up to frame innocent people. You are harassing me and I see right through you.

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
    “Litigating issues and discussing future litigation is not a threat. That’s why we have a justice system which appears to be corrupt and almost completely broken – but it is still there as a tool to achieve justice.” Kelley, of course you use the threat of future litigation to try and get others to stop posting. And to think you’re going to rely on a corrupt and broken justice system. I don’t believe you have any intention of relying on the justice system. What will happen when you don’t get the justice you think you deserve. What will you do then, Kelley. Make no mistake about it, the justice system is not setup so you can continue to harass ot\
    hers. As I’ve said before, be careful what you wish for, Kelley!

  471. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: DOJ – Clarkson Family Lawyern & Witness Tampering
    To: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, lkalpert@alpertbarr.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, “Maurice Smith” , “Duane” , Governor.ritter@state.co.us, governor@governor.ca.gov, attorney.general@state.co.us, stan.garnett@gmail.com, gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov, “becknerm” , lhank@bouldercounty.org, jhall@erieco.gov, teresa.low@doj.ca.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, pio@lapd.lacity.org, oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org, chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 1:22 AM

    To the Department of Justice,

    Do you think this story is ugly and/or vulgar enough? There are public allegatoins that the Clarkson family’s lawyer “tampered” with a witness in a criminal investigation by telling Laughlin to withhold information about Clarkson’s suicidal thoughts. The coroner was apparently told not to investigate this as an accident and not to do a psychological autopsy – which really bothered Paul Huebl. I have never in my life heard of anything like this. There are two suicides, destroyed lives, an innocent man in prison, and so many crimes it is unbelievable. Steve Cooley should be held personally responsible for this insanity, the waste of government resources, and the damage he and his office have done. If you think that this was all done for careers and money and because one man could not pay his taxes it is unbearably shameless.

    I guess Jackson and others think people do not see right through them. They are sadly mistaken and this bullying is outlandish conduct. I want to know if he is connected to it.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Laughlin’s testimony also revealed that the Clarkson family lawyer and others essentially tampered with a witness (Laughlin) in a criminal investigation by telling Laughlin to withhold information about Clarkson’s suicidal thoughts.

  472. Sydney Says:

    Did you catch that, folks? Arguments made 6 months ago relate to LC and PS right here and now. She actually thinks she can out-smart intelligent and well educated people. Blogonaut, she thought you would find the writer convincing – convincing of what? Of course, nothing in those postings relates to anything here on this blog. But that is no surprise coming from Kelley Lynch. And then she asks if I am being forced to visit this blog and insult her. Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.

  473. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Where do you think you are, Sydney – in a circus? The ringleader? Paul Huebl’s articles are very relevant and credible – t Phil Spector. Obviously they have nothng whatsoever to do with Leonard Cohen. Don’t be ridiculously absurd. What intelligent and educated people? No one on this Blog seems exceptionally intelligent or educated. I just posted these articles to Gianelli-Blogonaut can see credible artguemts re. a set up.

    These articles relate to ths BLog. You are all discussing Phil Spector and you personally, Sydney, have posted on Blogonaut’s Blog at least two times abou the Spector matter.

    Don’t insult my intelligence with your moronic rants.

    Kelley Lynch

    Sydney Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
    Did you catch that, folks? Arguments made 6 months ago relate to LC and PS right here and now. She actually thinks she can out-smart intelligent and well educated people. Blogonaut, she thought you would find the writer convincing – convincing of what? Of course, nothing in those postings relates to anything here on this blog. But that is no surprise coming from Kelley Lynch. And then she asks if I am being forced to visit this blog and insult her. Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.

  474. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Take a good hard look in the mirror. You are talking about yourself. You cannot insult me. I think you are moronic, yet crimnal, idiots. I am merely documenting your slander and refuting your attacks.

    Kelley Lynch Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.

  475. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Sydney Says:

    November 26th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    Who can insult this trashy wench? She’s been insulting herself for 5 years now.

  476. Kelley Lynch Says:

    P.S. Yes, let’s take a page from Aan Jackson’s playbook – when you have no argument, no legal positions, no evidence to support your lies and “theories,” call people sluts. Gossip. Lie. Slander. Malign. Defame. Shoot the messenger. Go to the hairdresser.

  477. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Tuesday, May 22, 2007
    Spector’s Limo Driver’s Story Folds…

    Limo driver Adriano DeSouza described the Colt Cobra accurately. He said it was a black gun with brown grips. But it was not in Phil Spector’s hand in this exact pose DeSouza demonstrated in court as he’s claimed. If this Colt Cobra revolver was in Spector’s hand DeSouza would have never even seen the grips.

    This startled limo driver simply assumed the gun was in Spector’s hand. If Adriano DeSouza really believes his own story we can only suspect in all the excitement his assumptions became his own reality.

    When police found Clarkson and the gun this is what they saw. The brown grips are clearly visible on this gun at Clarkson’e feet. It’s uncontested that DeSouza saw Clarkson slumped in the chair as this photo reveals.

  478. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Thursday, April 26, 2007
    Spector Lawyer Guts the Prosecutor
    Left to right Roger Jay Rosen, Phil Spector and Linda Kinney-Baden

    Spector’s lead lawyer, Bruce Cuttler has his brash style but leading the charge in the defense opening statement is Linda Kenney-Baden. Kenney-Baden specializes in forensic evidence matters that will make or break this case. Kenney-Baden shot the prosecutions theory full of holes and promised to deliver a who’s who list of forensic experts that will make it clear to the jury that Lana Clarkson died by her own hand.

    Linda Kenney-Baden is an gifted lawyer, author and happenes to be the wife of leading forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden. So far this attorney has made an impressive splash into Spector’s legal nightmare. Kenney-Baben has the right stuff to satisfy any CSI influenced jury members. She has a knack for explaining complicated scientific evidence with short sentences and simple words.

    Today the tables turned in the Spector trial circus. Folks you heard it from me Phil Spector is going to get his life back.

  479. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I wonder why Dr. James Pex was targeted and acused of perjury?

    Christine said…
    UNBELIEVABLE!!!

    They just went toooooo far, didn’t they? Wow!

    I was thinking this witness was the one who could make or break the case.

    Wonder what dinner is like up at the castle tonight.

    If Court TV had any brains at all they would have put cameras in for this case. It is really a doozy! I can hardly wait to read the full report tonight!

    February 11, 2009 7:09 PM

  480. Kelley Lynch Says:

    — On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch

    Subject: Diane Ogden’s Son

    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:49 AM

    Thinley Norbu Rinpoche, Karmapa, Sharmapa, and Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche,

    Read this. It is horrible and heartbreaking. The devastation of these trials is inconceivable.
    Imagine the pressure on Diane Ogden.

    Love,
    Kelley

    sean ogden said

    July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU

    — On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: I Wonder Who Posted All This Stuff?
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:47 AM

    To the Department of Justice,

    Could Dr. Pex have made or broken the case? There is a reason he was read his rights in the courtroom. Alan Jackson has attempted to undermine and destroy the careers of five major expert scientists. It cannot be that hard to talk to them and Phil Spector’s legal team – including Bruce Cutler.

    Reread Mr. Cutler’s opening argument and Juror #9’s interview on Court TV. A set up hardly begins to describe this ugly, vicious, nasty story.

    How do you force a gun into someone’s mouth? That is absurd.

    I have no doubt that this was intentional and planned. David Moorhead told me this would never have happened in Colorado and was an automatic appeal. Makes one wonder about “federal law.”

    Alan Jackson, lead prosecutor for the state, “cut the defense to the knees” by not bringing in Spector’s own statements during his opening argument. A preposterous, ludicous law – which makes the playing field uneven in favor of the prosecution so probably illegal.

    “But Alan Jackson decided not to even *mention* the statements in opening arguments, a strategy that Cutler found devastating to not only his opening statement, but his entire defense, he told Judge Fidler.”

    “Under California law, statements suspects give to law enforcement are *only* admissible by the prosecution. They are considered “hearsay” if the defense admits them, and that is not allowed. So now Cutler was faced with an opening statement that was wholly un presentable and a case that he needed to entirely overhaul.”

    http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/spector-refresher-opening-statements-and-admissions/

    The internet campaign to demonize Phil Spector and silence people who speak up about him (me, Nat McBride – who received a “death threat”) is unbelievable. And then there are the emails “criminally impersonating” Bruce Cutler. Now, I can assure you that I wouldn’t do this because my friend was on trial and his life is in jeopardy but it demands an investigation.

    Does the Department of Justice understand how Larry Fidler demanded that Phillip take the stand in order to permit Baby Doll Gibson to testify? How is that legal when Phillip has the right to 5th Amendment protection.

    And then there’s this. Nat asked a good question – how do you put a witness on the stand who cannot be cross examined? There are – obviously – two suicides here connected with drugs. One with a gun involved. Paul Huebll’s theory was that Alhambra PD screwed up and that’s where the set up began – they realized they had tasered an innocent man and were exposed to civil liability. Paul Huebl, I might point out, was Chicago PD. He also mentioned that actors play with prop guns and the prop masters repeatedly have to warn the actors about this.

    Judge Fidler throws a bone to the defense. “Without fully ruling, I don’t see why you can’t comment that you would not have questioned the witness this way. Fidler then reminds the people (since they haven’t brought it up yet) about their motion to exclude the defense from bringing into the trial Ms. Ogden’s cause of death. Judge Fidler then says he will approach this, …”working backwards. I won’t rule on that issue of excluding Ms. Ogden’s cause of death because (they) have to wait and see what discovery shows regarding cause of death.”

    Look at Katprint’s comments here. It sounds like intentional jury tampering.

    Katprint: Do you think there’s a fundamental difference between juries in Northern vs. Southern California?

    I fear the jury pool in L.A. is tainted by celebritymania (or as you said, their brains are fried by the sun) if we go by the south’s wrong-headed verdicts in OJ Simpson, Robert Blake, & Spector 1 vs. the north’s conviction of Scott Peterson & Hans Reiser.

    http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/spector-refresher-opening-statements-and-admissions/

    This is horrendous:

    sean ogden said
    July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm
    I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU

    http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/spector-refresher-opening-statements-and-admissions/

    In a July 30 Los Angeles Time story, Harriet Ryan wrote:
    “Ogden died in December of an accidental overdose of a prescription medication.”

    All the best,
    Kelley

    — On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Re: I Wonder Who Posted All This Stuff?
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:29 AM

    Kelley Lynch Says:
    November 27th, 2009 at 12:28 am
    I wonder why Dr. James Pex was targeted and acused of perjury?
    Christine said…
    UNBELIEVABLE!!!
    They just went toooooo far, didn’t they? Wow!
    I was thinking this witness was the one who could make or break the case.
    Wonder what dinner is like up at the castle tonight.
    If Court TV had any brains at all they would have put cameras in for this case. It is really a doozy! I can hardly wait to read the full report tonight!
    February 11, 2009 7:09 PM

    — On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: I Wonder Who Posted All This Stuff?
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:27 AM

    http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2009/02/phil-spector-retrial-jackson-accuses.html

    This sounds like Alan Jackson. I guess he really did think that Dr. Pex could make or break this case.

    Christine said…
    UNBELIEVABLE!!!

    They just went toooooo far, didn’t they? Wow!

    I was thinking this witness was the one who could make or break the case.

    Wonder what dinner is like up at the castle tonight.

    If Court TV had any brains at all they would have put cameras in for this case. It is really a doozy! I can hardly wait to read the full report tonight!

    February 11, 2009 7:09 PM

  481. Kelley Lynch Says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bOk_TWMQjY

    sean ogden said

    July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU

  482. Kelley Lynch Says:

    On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch

    Subject: Garrison Courtney – DEA

    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, “Duane”
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 4:55 AM

    Hello Garrison Courtney,

    Why don’t you take a look at Sean Ogden’s comments about his mother and her death – and slow poisoning. You don’t find this story brutal, do you? I personally think this situation is horrifying – from a human standpoint. There appear to be two suicides and countless devastated lives. There also happen to be a bunch of thugs targeting me on Phawker.com and some of them appear to have real motive.

    All the best,
    Kelley

    Kelley Lynch Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 12:52 am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bOk_TWMQjY

    sean ogden said

    July 16, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I saw my mothers face too days before she died and i could tell she was being poisoned solwley i did not know she was envolved in this fucking trial…and my stepher father put a restrain order on me when i recieved the call from him “YOUR MOTHERS DEAD I SAD WHAT THE FUCK WARE IS MY MOM??? HE SAID YOUR MOM HAD SOME PROBLMES AND THEY WERE BIG ONES AND I NEVER WANT TO SEE YOU EVER AGAIN” I SAID FUCK YOU

  483. Sydney Says:

    Their coming to take you away, ha ha ho ho hee hee
    To the funny farm
    Where life is beautiful all time ha ha ho ho hee hee…

  484. Kelly Green Says:

    Frist things first, no, Kelley, I’m a woman: a woman who likes to watch a good ol’ fashioned train wreck. And you are providing the entertainment.

    Kelley, we know you don’t have an attorney because you keep reminding us—you claim to have advisors, but I don’t believe that either. Any attorney who wants to save his career, and membership in a bar association, will refuse to advise you. Additionally, you’ve stated you intend to represent yourself. Have you ever heard of Susan Polk. Susan, too, descended into utter madness and chose to represent herself: granted her criminal situation was far more serious than your lunacy. However, she did defend herself, and she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Goggle her, read the transcripts—pay careful attention to what she did to her children—then ask yourself as your own attorney, will you fare any better than Susan.

    Just how deep do you intend to drag your children into the mire, Kelley? Let’s see, a judge ordered you to return all the documents you stole to Cohen: you not only refused to return the documents but you also stored the stolen documents in your son’s storage unit. Don’t you get it? Rutger can go to prison for aiding and abetting. Or do you just not care if he goes to prison; after all, mama’s crazy that’s her excuse but the kid’s on his own.

    As if dragging you own children deep into you personal pool of quick sand, now you intend to drag Dian Ogden’s son down with you. Just who the hell do you think you are?

  485. Kelly Green Says:

    I believe it was yesterday, you stated you helped other children with camp fees, tuition, tutors, etc. While it’s admirable you helped those less fortunate, I’m amazed you didn’t establish a college fund for your children. Or did you have an established college fund? If you did have such a fund, did you loot that, too?

    Another thing, did Rutger have your POA when SWAT descended upon you? If he didn’t, then it’s just your fantasy that anyone asked him to sign over your property to Cohen. You are living proof of the old adage: tell yourself something enough times and you’ll start to believe it’s true.

  486. Kelly Green Says:

    Actually, Kelley, the subject header of your email addressed to Alan Jackson reads: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters.

  487. Kelly Green Says:

    Kelley, from whom did you steal your 11/26/09, 8:40 PM, 8:41 PM, 8:42, 8:43 PM, 8:44 PM, 8:46 PM, 8:46PM, 10:02 PM, 10:04 PM, and 11/27/09 12:28 AM postings? Didn’t you steal these posting and published articles from others? There’s nothing to indicate you reprinted any of them with the authors’ permission. Stealing from the AP (your first 8:46 PM) is especially egregious and AP does take criminal and civil action. Let’s not forget, Linda Deutch was Spectors greatest supporter and fan. Linda Deutch never said a bad word about Spector. Oh, I remember, you don’t give a flying fig about other people’s copyrights.

  488. Kelly Green Says:

    As far as your public allegations regarding the Clarkson’s attorney tampering with a witness—well, actually, Kelley, you’re the only person raising that allegation. No credible person has raised that issue.

  489. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, I don’t recall saying I had advisers and that would not be any of your business, would it? I am not here to fulfill your fantasies or satisfy your curiosity. I am on this Blog, now, because a number of people – you included “Kelly Green” – have decided to target, attack, slander, defame, libel, threaten, harass, attempt to intimidate me, etc. Clearly this is a highly organized campaign of cyber-terrorists out to silence me, undermine me demean me, etc. Were it not – you would not be obsessed with me and/or these Blog posts, Cohen’s tax fraud, the Phil Spector matter, or insulting my intelligence with your banal (and frequently aggressive) rants/posts.

    Fortunately, you will not be involved in any relationship I have with my attorney. I will remind you, again, that we not know one another.

    For the record, I don’t care if you’re a man or a woman. It’ your conduct and words I am documenting. Unnterested in your boring and gratuitous madness remarks. How’s this – “ditto.” I will bring your remarks about “prison” to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, FBI, and Treasury. I think you are attempting to intimidate me so that I won’t testify against Leonard Cohen. Seems obvious. I’ll ask “the feds” to “pay careful”attention to your remarks about Susan and prison – also your IP address, real identity, etc.

    My children aren’t involved in this but their lives have been destroyed. What’s your interest in my children – further intimidation and threatening tacics. Try it on your mother. t’s not working with me. I wil advise “the feds” that I believe you are threatening my childen again.

    I din’t steal any dcuments from Cohen. He perjured himself and the Sheriff’s Department illegally seized many many documents – meant for the IRS. The IRS has many many documents and people can subpoena them drectly from the IRS. I own 99.5% of Traditional Holdngs and 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and am entitled to these records. I am also entitled to provide the IRS with evidence supporting the deadly serious allegations of criminal tax fraud. Dicuss all of this with the IRS. I have nothing further to say on the topic and that is most definitely an IRS matter since all documents are now in their possession. Maybe the judge at LA Superior Court who wilfully overlooked corporate records, stock certificates, notarized documents, and the fact that I wasn’t a trustee can comman the IRS and “the feds” around.

    I will bring you threats of Rutger and prison to the attention of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, and Agent Sopko and demand immediate assistance and intervention as your aggression has now increased – as have your threats. Rutger aided and abetted nothing. Go into court and prove that’s where the documents were.

    I understand that my posts defending Phil Spector are disturbing – in particular, the post of Diane Ogden’s son. I have asked the DEA to investigate her death and they should speak directly to her son.

    I think I’m a woman who was dragged into Phil Spector’s matter and had my life destroyed because I reported criminal tax fraud (Cohen’s). Who the hell do you think you are? Sammy Gravano?

    Kelley Lynch

  490. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green, nothing about my personal life, finances, or anything else is your business. Why don’t you establish colege fund for needy children if you find tha so admirable.

    Phil Spector, his legal team, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the DOJ, the FBI, and the Treasury may discuss issues re. SWAT and any possible POA that “Rutger” had. You are a vicious, aggressive individual who is threatening me, threatening my children, and attacking me. I have asked the IRS for immediate protection from you and the others threatening me, have advised them that I believe you are danerously unstabe, and have “motive.”

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 2:47 am
    I believe it was yesterday, you stated you helped other children with camp fees, tuition, tutors, etc. While it’s admirable you helped those less fortunate, I’m amazed you didn’t establish a college fund for your children. Or did you have an established college fund? If you did have such a fund, did you loot that, too?

    Another thing, did Rutger have your POA when SWAT descended upon you? If he didn’t, then it’s just your fantasy that anyone asked him to sign over your property to Cohen. You are living proof of the old adage: tell yourself something enough times and you’ll start to believe it’s true.

  491. Kelly Green Says:

    As usual, Kelley, you are the only one who thinks there’s a remote possibility you could be a helpful witness to anyone. You cherry pick words from the cogent statements of others—and you spin them it into fantasy.

    It’s late, and you are boring. A rational person would be ashamed of herself for taking up so much bandwidth of anothers blog. Again, you seem to think if you keep repeating and reposting others posts and emails, that the repeated postings will make you more credible. They do not, you are not, and you never will be credible. Since 8:40 PM (11/26?09) you stole 10 postings/articles from others. And you posted each one here in hopes others would think you wrote them.

    Since spring 2009, you’ve been repeating the same thing over and over and over again.
    Your repeated responses and repeated postings are like those of a high school student. You remember, the one who always thought she was smarter and more clever than everyone else. And like a petulant highschooler, you foolishly think you wrote one great thesis—and you think you’re soooo much smarter than everyone else. And like a highschooler, you think all you have to do is change a few words–and voila—you have a new, up-to-date paper. It’s not until you get to college and you turn in that same paper, then you learn you’re just not that smart and clever afterall. So, Kelley, it’s time to tell you that you’re not that great or smart, and you need to come up with some new responses.

    It’s time for you to get a new schtick.

  492. Kelly Green Says:

    Yes, Kelley, all the posters on the internet got together and decided that you would the one person to be picked on.

    You can do better than that.

  493. Kelly Green Says:

    At any time, Kelley, you can open your blog so others can post. You choose not to. Why? What are you afraid of?

  494. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Green,

    I know what the “header” – subject line – read on my email to Alan Jackson. I think Jackson, a government lawyer, should be clear not to destroy any evidence whatsoever that relates to his communications with Gianelli-Blogonaut or anyone associated with that Blog and posting on this Blog. That would include Michelle Blaine.

    I figured you, Green, would be weighing in on the postings I used from Paul Huebl’s site. Do you represent Paul, whom Ive spoken with, or have you been contacted by Paul about these posts? If not – mind your own business and I’ll give Paul a head’s up.

    I realize that Linda Deutsch has also come under attack from the anti-Spector camp.

    Actually Paul Huebl raised the issue re. the Clarkson family lawyer and witness tampering. I only posted what he wrote. Please threaten Paul Huebl directly. Paul’s credible. He is an investigator, attended at least one of the trials, was Chicago PD.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 2:48 am
    Actually, Kelley, the subject header of your email addressed to Alan Jackson reads: Do Not Destroy Any Communications Relating To These Matters.

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 2:52 am
    Kelley, from whom did you steal your 11/26/09, 8:40 PM, 8:41 PM, 8:42, 8:43 PM, 8:44 PM, 8:46 PM, 8:46PM, 10:02 PM, 10:04 PM, and 11/27/09 12:28 AM postings? Didn’t you steal these posting and published articles from others? There’s nothing to indicate you reprinted any of them with the authors’ permission. Stealing from the AP (your first 8:46 PM) is especially egregious and AP does take criminal and civil action. Let’s not forget, Linda Deutch was Spectors greatest supporter and fan. Linda Deutch never said a bad word about Spector. Oh, I remember, you don’t give a flying fig about other people’s copyrights.

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 2:53 am
    As far as your public allegations regarding the Clarkson’s attorney tampering with a witness—well, actually, Kelley, you’re the only person raising that allegation. No credible person has raised that issue.

  495. Kelly Green Says:

    I guess all we can do is hope the IRS takes an immediate interest in you and your welfare. Hopefully, they will put you someplace where you will have no internet access, and for the sake of your family, no access to them either. Your family deserves better treatment than they’ve gotten from you. Why does your son always draw the short straw?

  496. Kelly Green Says:

    Well, at least you’ve confirmed you stole 10 articles/postings from others—and you don’t even have the decency to cite the sources. You’ve also confirmed you just don’t give a damn. Oh well, Once a thief…

  497. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelly Green, here is a copy of my email to Paul Huebl regarding all articles I posted here that originally appeared on his Blog. I don’t think you can accuse me of stealing when Paul Huebl has not. He is the one that raised the issue with respect to the Clarkson family’s lawyer and witness tampering. I brought that to te attention of the DOJ and FBI. All posts were borrowed from Paul. I’ll privately discuss any concerns with him drectly – unless you are representing him in some way. Ive asked him to take a look at this Blog and your posts in particular. I’ve spoken with Paul, who raised the allegation that Clarkson family lawyer tampered with a witness, and – trust me – he’s credible. Very very credible. Also, an incredibly decent human being who believes in justice.

    His copyrights are not your concern now are they, Green? Your threats about me an my son are my concern though, aren’t they? In fact, you could wind up in prison for your conduct and actions on this site if I’m not mistaken. Perhaps the DOJ and/or FBI have some thoughts on that. Not everyone is stupid. You are not deceiving everyone. Perhaps your arrogance has realy gone to your head and you can’t really tell that “We see right through you.” No, I will not tell you who “we” is or who represents me. You’ll see us in court. It’s irrelevant whether you believe that. I’m merely docmenting your threats, the issues you are obsessed with, your attacks, your slander, your lies, and the fact that I think you are trash – as evidenced by your crass and vulgar posts. I also think your posts are evidene that you are dangerously unstable and delusonal if you think you are going to threaten me and my children and get away with it legally.

    Over to you, LIAR.

    KeleyLynch

    — On Fri, 11/27/09, Kelley Lynch wrote:

    From: Kelley Lynch
    Subject: Paul Huebl
    To: doronweinberg@aol.com, Dennis@riordan-horgan.com, *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov, Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov
    Cc: ajackson@da.lacounty.gov, welcomingflowers@yahoo.com, 17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com, bhakhatulku@yahoo.com, Garrison.K.Courtney@usdoj.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, rbyucaipa@yahoo.com, robert.macmillan@gmail.com, moseszzz@mztv.com, “Duane” , housedick@gmail.com
    Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 7:28 AM

    Hello Paul,

    I am being accused, now, of stealing your posts about Phil Spector. I posted them on Phawker.com and “Kelly Green” is now incredibly upset and threatening me. It has also threatened my son Rutger with prison – based on the fact that I provided the IRS with documents relating to Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal. Apparently, these articles (of yours) upset people on Phawker.com – as did Diane Ogden’s son’s incredibly tragic posting about his mother’s final days and her slow poisoning. Apparently “Green” – who is a vicious thug and liar targeting me and my children and absolutely obsessed with Phillip’s matter – never heard the allegations you raised on your Blog about the Clarkson family lawyer and witness tampering. I brought it to the attention of the DOJ which is probably what really upset “Green.”

    Take a look at what’s going on with this Blog – it includes criminal harassment, terrorist threats and/or threats, witness tampering, an attempt to derail/obstruct justice with respect to a potential and/or pending federal criminal prosecution, cyber-terrorism, stalking, you-name-it. They sky’s the limit when it comes to this crowd and criminal conduct. The arrogance and their crassness is appalling.

    I trust you’re well.

    http://www.phawker.com/2009/10/23/mailbag-leonard-cohen-is-not-a-great-man/#comment-213821

    All the best,
    Kelley

  498. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Kelly Green,

    I do hope the IRS takes immediate action. The threats and aggression – yours included – are clearly escallating and extend to my children. Don’t worry about how the IRS or others decide to protet me. It is not your business and I do not know you.

    Why are you so obsessed and fixated with Rutger? Because he witnessed SWAT, ws asked to go in and transfer my house to Cohen, and has seen so much during this ordeal? Or, is it due to the fact that an attorney told us he was probably a material “witness” in the Phil Spector matter?

    No I did not confirm any such thing, Green. You are just proving you are a liar. I tend to doubt you represent Paul Huebl. I posted my email to him above. Check out his Blog. I believe there are more Phil Spector related posts. Paul certainly does seem to have a handle on Phillip’s “matter.”

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 3:25 am
    I guess all we can do is hope the IRS takes an immediate interest in you and your welfare. Hopefully, they will put you someplace where you will have no internet access, and for the sake of your family, no access to them either. Your family deserves better treatment than they’ve gotten from you. Why does your son always draw the short straw?

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am
    Well, at least you’ve confirmed you stole 10 articles/postings from others—and you don’t even have the decency to cite the sources. You’ve also confirmed you just don’t give a damn. Oh well, Once a thief…

  499. Kelley Lynch Says:

    Paul Huebl’s Blog – Interesting Articles on the Phil Spector set up. Thanks Paul.

    http://www.crimefilenews.com/2008/05/barack-obama-on-self-defense-and-gun.html

  500. Kelley Lynch Says:

    I’m not afraid of anything – obviously – and I am not going to be silenced on terrorized by brainless, moronic thugs who are engaged in what I beleive is crminal activity that definitely seems to relate to Leonard Cohen’s Criminal Tax Fraud Matter, Phil Spector, and undermining me and me children – as witnesses (in any potential and/or pending federal criminal prosecution of Leonard Cohen or possibly Phil Spector … probably not the appeal, however, as nothing was raised on the “record” about these issues although I did fax the judge and faxed a copy of that commnication to Doron Weinberg).

    I don’t want to open comments on my Blog. How’s that for an answer?

    I don’t think all the posters on the internet got together to target and attack me but I think a well-organized campaign of cyber-terrorism is underway and I believe the motive is to undemine my credibility as a witness, Rutger’s credibility as a witness, to derail/obstruct a possible federal prosecution of Leonard Cohen (surely the L.A. “DA” needs to keep him credible, etc.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 3:18 am
    Yes, Kelley, all the posters on the internet got together and decided that you would the one person to be picked on.

    You can do better than that.

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 3:20 am
    At any time, Kelley, you can open your blog so others can post. You choose not to. Why? What are you afraid of?

  501. Kelley Lynch Says:

    If it’s so boring, Green, why are you so obsessed and fixated with me and these matters? Why are you threatening me, Rutger, and what is the reason for your aggression?

    Actually, I think I’ve been repeating the same thing – with the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others copied in – since 2005. I provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff with tremendous evidence before Cohen’s fraudulent perjured ex parte hearing. That’s why he had one. They understood, because they (Scott Edelman, Ken Doron, Gibson Dumb and Dumber) were copied in on my emails, that I was sending every document and every piece of evidence I had (stored for Cohen for years – Steven Machat even confirmed this … he was there when Cohen came into NYC and knows Cohen advised the to hand over everything to me after Marty Machat’s death and instructed me to take it t my apartment). Get your facts straight. The IRS has been in possession of this evidence since 2005. If you have any issues wth that write the IRS Commissioner’s Staff directly at *IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov. Maybe they can figure out why you are threatenng me and Rutger with prison for evidence I turned over to them.

    Give me a break with your lectures. If you don’t like what I have to say or can’t tiolerate the truth tear yourself away from this Blog and get a life.

    I didn’t hope someone thought I wrote Paul Huebl’s articles/postings. You are an outrageous con artist and calculated liar and terrorist.

    It’s time for you to realize that you are engaging in criminal activity – including threatening me, etc. Thanks for noting that you are an arrogant idiot, however. Point well taken and duly noted.

    It’s time for you to get a lawyer.

    Kelley Lynch

    Kelly Green Says:

    November 27th, 2009 at 3:16 am
    As usual, Kelley, you are the only one who thinks there’s a remote possibility you could be a helpful witness to anyone. You cherry pick words from the cogent statements of others—and you spin them it into fantasy.

    It’s late, and you are boring. A rational person would be ashamed of herself for taking up so much bandwidth of anothers blog. Again, you seem to think if you keep repeating and reposting others posts and emails, that the repeated postings will make you more credible. They do not, you are not, and you never will be credible. Since 8:40 PM (11/26?09) you stole 10 postings/articles from others. And you posted each one here in hopes others would think you wrote them.

    Since spring 2009, you’ve been repeating the same thing over and over and over again.

    Your repeated responses and repeated postings are like those of a high school student. You remember, the one who always thought she was smarter and more clever than everyone else. And like a petulant highschoo