Phawker

You Report, We Decide

News, Media, Politics, Music, Culture, Gossip, In The 215 And The Great Beyond

Media Matters To NY Times’ David Brooks: What Part of SANTORUM SUCKS COCK IN HELL Don’t You Understand?

Now that we have your attention, what Media Matters actually said was:

NY Times‘ Brooks lauded Santorum’s anti-poverty work, ignored his charity-related controversies:

Summary: In a recent column, David Brooks wrote that if Sen.santorum_thumb.png Rick Santorum loses his Pennsylvania Senate seat, it’s “probably good news in Pennsylvania’s bobo suburbs” but “certainly bad for poor people around the world.” Brooks, however, did not mention the controversy surrounding Santorum’s own charity, or his attacks on prominent international humanitarian groups.

Media Matters: Making Media Matter Since A Coupla Years Ago
Attytood: Bono Is Wrong-O, Seriously Santorum Sucks You-Know-What In H-E-Double-Toothpick

[Digg] [del.icio.us] [StumbleUpon] [Google] [Facebook] [Reddit] [Technorati] [Slashdot]

One Response to “Media Matters To NY Times’ David Brooks: What Part of SANTORUM SUCKS COCK IN HELL Don’t You Understand?”

  1. Phawker » Blog Archive » GAYBO: First We Take Santorum; Joan Collins At The Forrest; Woody’s For Sale? Says:

    […] It’s Election Eve 2006 and I’m just up to my ears in excitement! Now, remember to stick to the plan: First we take Santorum, then the rest of The GOP in 2008. The Hillary/Obama ticket is gonna rock those Republican bitches into the next decade! You may ask, is the world ready for a dyke and a black man? HELLS YES! If the last eight years has proven anything it is this: You simply cannot drop the soap in front of a Republican. It’s too risky. Republicans are just too unstable, too many are just barely holding their gay in check. There was this gal I work with we’ll call Ruffhouse who was angry that Phawker would picture a Senator with the words I EAT COCK. I think he’s fair game for this kind of thing. His obsession with homosexuals borders on the pathological and my gaydar says possible repressed gay tendencies that he’s buried in Catholicism and hidden with prolific procreation. We all know that it is entirely possible for a possibly-gay man to sire that big a brood if he puts his closeted-mind to it. I plan on celebrating the end of the “dog-on-man sex era” with a nice martini, maybe at Bump. Come on around and introduce yourself. Bring your drapery swatches for The Congressional overhaul. It’ll be as much fun as Cyndi Lauper in the 80’s! […]

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Via BuzzFeed